Ok I know this is wrong section but I thought id get more attention brought to the subject if I posted it here,
So im wondering when we are gonna be able to OC past 1.2 cuz the Droid X and the Droid 2 are now OC'ed to 3ghz from what I heard...
Sent from my Galaxy Superbeast using XDA App
According to BGR its rubbish.
http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2010...to-face-melting-2-0ghz/?utm_source=feedburner
That said, there is talk in the Epic forums of the phones hitting 1.4GHz, you might see if you can convince one of the devs from there to send over the code to one of the active vibrant devs.
Also, if you are willing to pay for it, Kingklicks has 1.3GHz version of his kernel.
FYI, saying you are smart enough to know where to post is not going to make posting in the wrong section okay. In fact its just a slap in the face. Rule are rules mate, you are not beyond them. Many of the members here do read General and Q&A, both of which would have been acceptable places for this thread.
Ill look into it, see if they send it over
And I know ur right
Sent from my Galaxy Superbeast using XDA App
is someone actually charging money for a linux kernel?
How do you increase your ghz output?
Lavundra21 said:
How do you increase your ghz output?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More cowbell.
I built a kernel capable of OVER 9000GHz!!!
kingklick's premium kernel allows 1.3ghz
http://kingxklick.com/
you have to subscribe to his premium membership @ $5.50/mo for the kernel and then updates though.
Aka I won't be getting that kernel, paying for a kernel.. Ha
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
if its not stable who gives a whoa.
turbosix said:
kingklick's premium kernel allows 1.3ghz
http://kingxklick.com/
you have to subscribe to his premium membership @ $5.50/mo for the kernel and then updates though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously!? People actually pay that for an extra 100mhz over the FREE modded kernels? That's just ludicrous!
Sent from: my Vibrant juiced with Eugene's 2.2 Froyo JPM
I have a popcorn kernel
What's wrong with charging money for work? It's based on the GPL, he's allowed to charge as long as he's providing his source code to everyone and anyone he distributes the kernel to.
It was 2.5 not 3
http://www.talkandroid.com/18751-dr...mours,+and+Updates)&utm_content=Google+Reader
Sent from my vibrant
mmas0n said:
More cowbell.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome!.... just what I needed at the end of a rough day.... I've got a fever...
But im gonna say this was a hoax cause the devs that said they did it won't release the code.
Sent from my vibrant
freekyfrogy said:
I built a kernel capable of OVER 9000GHz!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fail troll is fail.
NikolaiT said:
Fail troll is fail.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since when are jokes trolling? Or are you joking? I just can't tell anymore...
Well, you can't really tell what's a home and what's tripling on the internet these days, but this is getting off-topic so lets stop.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Anderdroid said:
What's wrong with charging money for work? It's based on the GPL, he's allowed to charge as long as he's providing his source code to everyone and anyone he distributes the kernel to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the people he distributes the kernel to, as well as the source code, have a right with the GPL to redistribute the source code for free as well as being able to share the compiled kernel for free, i believe. does no one just redistribute his kernel?
Related
I know everyone here is waiting for the latest and greatest with froyo release but are there any 2.1 roms in the works?
Also inb4 make your own. I don't know how, I wish I did because I would, I don't know why people are withholding their skills because we don't have 2.2...
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
You're probably about to get flamed for this
But there is work being done, it's just not always visible on this forum. I'd say head over to the irc channel if you're looking for the bleeding edge of development information.
By all means folks don't label me as unapreciative, that's not what I was getting at by any means. I appreciate all the hard work that is being done, I know I myself am by no means helping. Just looking for any info regarding. I like to see what devs can bring to the table and the talent that I wish I had. I'd be more than happy to throw money in the directions of developers, jt and dirrk will soon see some. I can't dev but I do support which is why I asked...
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
dboss713 said:
You're probably about to get flamed for this
But there is work being done, it's just not always visible on this forum. I'd say head over to the irc channel if you're looking for the bleeding edge of development information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are there any good IRC apps?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
I use yaaic yet another android irc client.... Pretty basic and easy. You'll have to make an account on freenode before you can login.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
DigitalDementia said:
Are there any good IRC apps?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Windows: X-chat (the silverx builds are a bit outdated but work fine and are free)
Android: Andchat.
I second andchat
Sent from my Fascinate - 1.4ghz OC by Dirrk
Specifically a question for developers:
So I'm just curious when do you guys think an ICS custom ROM might be available for our vibrants?
More specifically, has google released enough of the SDK and/or ICS code for someone to actually make a working ICS ROM?
Can't wait to see it in action!
Thanks
Edit: my question really is:
what requirements do developers need to start working on a custom ROM when a new OS is released?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
source hasnt dropped, the sdk is out and someone has it on the nexus s 4g, probably wont see a stable one until cm. also this is the wrong section.
bearsfan85 said:
source hasnt dropped, the sdk is out and someone has it on the nexus s 4g, probably wont see a stable one until cm. also this is the wrong section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool.... thought this question was related to development...thats why i posted here...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
I have ICS on my vibrant now. Real easy to jsut compile your own from the sdk and flash.
Can't get gps working though.
3-4 Months until you have something usable. That is provided the Vibrant still has developers left to work on it. A lot of ppl switched.
beren28 said:
I have ICS on my vibrant now. Real easy to jsut compile your own from the sdk and flash.
Can't get gps working though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure you do.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
beren28 said:
I have ICS on my vibrant now. Real easy to jsut compile your own from the sdk and flash.
Can't get gps working though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[email protected] easy! Anyone anywhere who had working ics on a phone would be on every forum bragging till their head pops off..
There are hundreds of articles that say that google is releasing the source code once "it is officially on devices".
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2395048,00.asp
How long will it take them to have a working rom is another question. The gps issue we have with gingerbread has never been actually fixed, I think it is a driver issue..?
Either way, it all depends, but it IS a valid question once the source is released, until then people are just going to flame your thread.
Silentbtdeadly said:
[email protected] easy! Anyone anywhere who had working ics on a phone would be on every forum bragging till their head pops off..
There are hundreds of articles that say that google is releasing the source code once "it is officially on devices".
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2395048,00.asp
How long will it take them to have a working rom is another question. The gps issue we have with gingerbread has never been actually fixed, I think it is a driver issue..?
Either way, it all depends, but it IS a valid question once the source is released, until then people are just going to flame your thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol....they can flame away... just trying to learn as much as I can about this process ;}
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
djordan79 said:
just trying to learn as much as I can about this process ;}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is your friend.
And regardless if this is a question about development for developers, it's still the wrong section. That is why we have a "Q&A" section for future development or whatever.
djquick said:
Google is your friend.
And regardless if this is a question about development for developers, it's still the wrong section. That is why we have a "Q&A" section for future development or whatever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah... I got that already.... Thanks for repeating what someone else has already said.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
I'm here to help
djordan79 said:
Cool.... thought this question was related to development...thats why i posted here...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, it's still a question, regardless of the content, unless there is a specific development thread about ics, this question belongs in the q&a section, you're not someone special where the rules don't apply.
Secondly, since source for ics hasn't even been released yet (this is the vibrant, so some sdk port won't ever work, regardless of your secret hopes and dreams), and even then, it's gonna take people a bit to get situated with the new code, and get used to the new features, apis, and bugs.
To ask for a timeline for something that's not even out into phones that it's actually built for is kinda insulting to people IMHO.
But, I give it 2-3 months after source drop to get into a basic useable form on the vibrant.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
Guys, I have started working on ICS, should get it booting tonight. Will do some work tomorrow and on weekend.
geoffcorey said:
First of all, it's still a question, regardless of the content, unless there is a specific development thread about ics, this question belongs in the q&a section, you're not someone special where the rules don't apply.
Secondly, since source for ics hasn't even been released yet (this is the vibrant, so some sdk port won't ever work, regardless of your secret hopes and dreams), and even then, it's gonna take people a bit to get situated with the new code, and get used to the new features, apis, and bugs.
To ask for a timeline for something that's not even out into phones that it's actually built for is kinda insulting to people IMHO.
But, I give it 2-3 months after source drop to get into a basic useable form on the vibrant.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude... Really?.... Lol.... Hopes and dreams?.... What?.... Just asking a legit question.... I wasnt demanding a time frame.... Tard
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
djordan79 said:
Dude... Really?.... Lol.... Hopes and dreams?.... What?.... Just asking a legit question.... I wasnt demanding a time frame.... Tard
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, I never said you demanded a a timeline, I said you asked. And the hopes and dreams thing wasn't directly at you, it was directed at all the people who don't finish reading a sentence, and only tale from a sentence what they want and twist everything around (and also takes cares of the stupid "one can hope" comments).
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
geoffcorey said:
First, I never said you demanded a a timeline, I said you asked. And the hopes and dreams thing wasn't directly at you, it was directed at all the people who don't finish reading a sentence, and only tale from a sentence what they want and twist everything around (and also takes cares of the stupid "one can hope" comments).
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok.... Glad you could impart some useful information... Oh wait... Nevermind
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
ali1276 said:
Guys, I have started working on ICS, should get it booting tonight. Will do some work tomorrow and on weekend.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad to hear an good to see your still around
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
If they actually do get an actual ICS rom going on the Vibrant \ i'll install it, regardless of GPS or no, i never use it anywho
Can I cut him? Please?
http://galnetmiui.co.uk/landing/ics-builds/
here's a Vibrant ICS custom ROM i saw on internet
Now that the galnet att miui thread is closed where can we find updates? I am aware that we can go to the galnet site but I only see the I9100, correct me if I'm wrong but we will have problems if we try to flash this version. If we don't get our own version on galnet what needs to be modified from the I9100 version to be compatible with our device. Sorry if it's a dumb question or if it has been answered elsewhere.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Best bet would be to try and get galnet to add support for the att sgs2
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Why are galnet roms not allowed on XDA?
Sent from my páhhōniē
according to the mod who locked the thread said galnet is not allowed on xda. did this group do something?
Lets jump on miui.us forums. Those roms have ota support. The dev seems new though.
Sent from my NookColor using xda premium
http://pastebin.com/kDkd0D0i
Here is something I found on it. Seems like they were asking for donations to get beta releases of their Roms and XDA did not approve...
Mod please reply
I for one would really appreciate a response from a moderator as to why, particularly given the conversation pasted in the above post, why it is that these threads were killed. On the surface, it seems arbitrary and without merit...
Went through other galnet threads that were closed and the reason is that they don't release their source for the rom.
yea they are shady. Good roms but they do not comply to gpl.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
I just got a (pretty quick) response from zelendel:
Galnet has been banned from XDA for breaking mutiple rules.
Check here
http://www.galnetmiui.co.uk/landing...160-XDA-Developers?p=7923&viewfull=1#post7923
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my páhhōniē
what about the non-galnet miui? Is that one okay?
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
quarlow said:
what about the non-galnet miui? Is that one okay?
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That one also got pulled, well for the AT&T version I know it did. I do believe it was something to do with Techn and not to do with MIUI.us
yoderk said:
http://pastebin.com/kDkd0D0i
Here is something I found on it. Seems like they were asking for donations to get beta releases of their Roms and XDA did not approve...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JKAY does that....
dan_maran said:
That one also got pulled, well for the AT&T version I know it did. I do believe it was something to do with Techn and not to do with MIUI.us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But did it get pulled because it was merged with the galnet version, or did it get pulled for other reasons?
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
shoman94 said:
JKAY does that....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah I remember seeing a few devs doing that back in the cappy forum a while back..
Galnet is gone... I'm not sure if we'll see the whole story, but from what I can see, I can say I don't like their attitude. It also looks like this is something that has taken a LONG time to reach finality.
As to why vanilla MIUI might have been pulled - I don't know. I'm fairly certain vanilla MIUI for the I777 was kosher GPL-wise, unless there's another GPL component beyond the kernel in question.
Here, this may enlighten the situation a bit...
zelendel said:
It means that the android kernel is protected by GPL laws. Which means the source code has to be made available. MIUI breaks these laws and refuses to post the source. So all MIUI roms have to have a custom kernel not made by the MIUI team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
zelendel said:
Please use the proper site to talk about this Rom. The galnet site is your best bet as this Rom is not supported on XDA due to GPL violations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
zelendel said:
It is built off of CM. The source has been asked for a few times and they flat out refuse to release the kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So long story short, they violated several rules and GPL laws. They are gone and not coming back.
It didn't get pulled I had the admin removed it because it was to much drama at the time but it looks like I shouldnt have even tho I don't know as much as some ad these other dev, I'll reopen the thread and anyone is more than welcome to Help out with the development of the rom/port.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Red5 said:
Here, this may enlighten the situation a bit...
Reference.
So long story short, they violated several rules and GPL laws. They are gone and not coming back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you saying that as long as the miui rom is packaged with a open source available kernel it can be posted on xda ?
Sent from my sgs2 using Tapatalk.
shoman94 said:
So you saying that as long as the miui rom is packaged with a open source available kernel it can be posted on xda ?
Sent from my sgs2 using Tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, opposite. As long as they are not including the stock MIUI kernel with the rom then they are not breaking any XDA rules. But if you do see a MIUI rom including the stock MIUI kernel, thats where they break rules. There is a stock MIUI kernel built off of CM. The source has been asked for a few times and they flat out refuse to release the kernel source... so the upper staff decided to can the whole thing.
This is a Google+ post asking Samsung to release the source code for the bluetooth/audio/MHL/dock/display devices in our phone. If you're not aware, this code is NOT in the open source kernel. They are modules that load separately. We need this source code to make our phone the PERFECT Android phone. Cyanogenmod Dev Team can do wonders with this code! Please +1 this post or even make your own. We need to Samsung to hear us! Not all of us are programmers (definitely not me), so we need to contribute in other ways!
Jim
OccupySamsung!
I would say that the requested code might have some (if not all) proprietary code and even some "secret" code when it comes to the NHL part for the hdmi encryption...
But I could be completely wrong about that...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Its possible, but any code drop would help. And the encryption you're thinking of would be HDCP and that should be handled by the chipset not the software.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Just sent Samsung mobile USA a message on Facebook about the source code, hope they respond.
Please people, let's get Samsung to recognize us! We need this source to make our phones the best. I know I say that every couple of posts. I just hope that the guy above this post gets lots of 'likes' on his Facebook post to Sammy. Help him out guys/gals!
Jim
I actually once managed to get a message from a guy at Samsung Support telling me to reach out to SamsungJohn for developer needs...
I sent him a pretty nasty message back, going into post-by-post detail of SamsungJohn's complete failure to provide any help whatsoever to the developer community.
I'm seriously thinking that my next device will be a Sony - As much as I hate Sony in general, SE went above and beyond in terms of supporting the Cyanogenmod team, leading to their entire 2011 lineup being almost fully supported by CM. Meanwhile, Samsung sends a few CM team members devices as a publicity stunt and doesn't bother at all to provide any followup support.
Entropy512 said:
I actually once managed to get a message from a guy at Samsung Support telling me to reach out to SamsungJohn for developer needs...
I sent him a pretty nasty message back, going into post-by-post detail of SamsungJohn's complete failure to provide any help whatsoever to the developer community.
I'm seriously thinking that my next device will be a Sony - As much as I hate Sony in general, SE went above and beyond in terms of supporting the Cyanogenmod team, leading to their entire 2011 lineup being almost fully supported by CM. Meanwhile, Samsung sends a few CM team members devices as a publicity stunt and doesn't bother at all to provide any followup support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw the post you are talking about. And I sent a Twitter to SamsungJohn and never heard back. I know I keep talking about this, but something has to be changed. I'm on UnNamedROM right now, and while it's good, it's not CM. Maybe if Sammy releases ICS for the I9100/I777 then they'll release some more code for our phones. Probably don't want CM to show them up on releases. But either way, we need to make Samsung aware of our demands. And Entropy, thank you VERY much for your efforts with NFC, and WiFi tether. It's much appreciated!
Code was already released for S2 international version...see zedomax website.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
SII 2 Envy said:
Code was already released for S2 international version...see zedomax website.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And the significance of that for our i777 would be....?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
SII 2 Envy said:
Code was already released for S2 international version...see zedomax website.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe I missed it. I did a search and came up with nothing.
Kadin said:
And the significance of that for our i777 would be....?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might help us start to port it to our own device
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA App
SII 2 Envy said:
Code was already released for S2 international version...see zedomax website.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it hasn't been released (except for the GPL kernel source) - nothing ICS-related, none of the audio libraries or anything like that have source code.
zedomax.com has nothing but pages and pages of stupid Top Five posts.
Entropy512 said:
No, it hasn't been released (except for the GPL kernel source) - nothing ICS-related, none of the audio libraries or anything like that have source code.
zedomax.com has nothing but pages and pages of stupid Top Five posts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
galaxys2root.com and YouTube
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
I tried reaching out to samsungjohn, too. Obviously no response.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
If only they would...I'm sure they're planning some event around it.
lol we can only hope.
if crpalmer's kernel is based of elkay's which is based on dsb9938's and it pulls some source from a few others how do we keep them all straight? is crpalmer's based on the newest revisions of both other kernels? we need a comparison chart containing all the features of each kernel highlighting the differences and similarities of each.
by the wording in crpalmer's thread, assuming it's based on all the recent submits, then it would be the most recent update especially considering it uses linux 3.4.31 when the others use lower versions. (unless there is an even newer one i havn't read yet)
KyJelly69 said:
if crpalmer's kernel is based of elkay's which is based on dsb9938's and it pulls some source from a few others how do we keep them all straight? is crpalmer's based on the newest revisions of both other kernels? we need a comparison chart containing all the features of each kernel highlighting the differences and similarities of each.
by the wording in crpalmer's thread, assuming it's based on all the recent submits, then it would be the most recent update especially considering it uses linux 3.4.31 when the others use lower versions. (unless there is an even newer one i havn't read yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So make a chart then.
beaups said:
So make a chart then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you clearly deserve a ribbon for most helpful.
If I knew what the differences were, or even how to find all of them, i would. but i sure as hell wouldn't share it with you.
KyJelly69 said:
you clearly deserve a ribbon for most helpful.
If I knew what the differences were, or even how to find all of them, i would. but i sure as hell wouldn't share it with you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's github links for each kernel in the their respective threads. I don't need a chart.
Now that's funny.
Then why are being a trolling ass? This topic obviously has nothing to do with you. This is the HELP section. If you want to be a jerk go do it in the dev section.
Now you get a gold star and your little buddy too.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
KyJelly69 said:
Then why are being a trolling ass? This topic obviously has nothing to do with you. This is the HELP section. If you want to be a jerk go do it in the dev section.
Now you get a gold star and your little buddy too.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody is being a jerk.
How can you come in here and say we "need" a chart? That would be a great way for you to contribute...
Instead, you pop off to the people who gave you the ability to run said custom kernels in the first place.
Nice.
beaups said:
Nobody is being a jerk.
How can you come in here and say we "need" a chart? That would be a great way for you to contribute...
Instead, you pop off to the people who gave you the ability to run said custom kernels in the first place.
Nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sure as hell aren't being very helpful in the help section. All you are doing is being a self-righteous ***** becuase you think i owe you something. That's what donatons are for. If you can't help the people that are asking for it in the help section then shut up and move on.
Saying "we need one" is just another way of asking if there is one. so, for clarity, is there a list of features comparing kernels? Maybe if I get a second between raising a family and curing cancer I'll teach myself github but as of now I don't know how. That's why I posted in the help section. At least I followed the rules and didn't ask in the dev section. Get over yourself.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
beaups said:
So make a chart then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly I was thinking the same thing. Take to bull by the horns OP. Not trying to be an a$$ but we would all have to dig through the information only the developers would really know what the differences are. Do it man!
You just assume I have the time and technical ability to do so. And, I didn't ask anybody to make one, only that we need/is there one.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
FYI, I wrote a high level summary of the differences in my kernel thread.
crpalmer said:
FYI, I wrote a high level summary of the differences in my kernel thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for pointing that out, I had to read through several pages to find it. But I was thinking more of a chart showing who's kernel has which parts from other's kernels. In the end it will probably never happen so at least thank you for that.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
If you're going to post to the forums please keep it respectful with each other.
As others have mentioned everyone should have a link to their github or respective sources in their OPs. Just go there and spend a few minutes browsing their recent activity tabs to see what all they've changed. But, if for some reason they're not providing their source please report the thread for violating GPL.
Thread Closed.