[Q] slow 3d test on quadrant after updating to 0.435 - XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

After updating to 0.435 in the first test 3d of quadrant donĀ“t pass of 132 fps an before a have a result of 206 fps.

Related

[Q] why is the Archos 70IT so slow on Quandrant "planet" test?

Hi!
Just run a few times quadrant and even tho the overall 3D score is fine, I wonder why the "planet" bench is so slow on archos tabs?
I have about 10 fps where my HTC desire with a weaker GPU does 40! Other 3D tests are faster than my desire, but this "planet" test...
Do you have the same poor score? Would it be a kernel/driver issue? I was expecting better performances from the GPU. But it's only a bench, and games are running smoothly anyway
I've the same poor score, but it's normal.
The planet test seems to be incompatible to the Archos.
The GPU is very good, like you can see in the other tests.

Comparing Benchmark results for different roms

Hey, guys I just thought it would've been nice if we could compare the Benchmark results for the different roms for the HTC Hero. The best would've been if we could have the scores on a clean rom aka a rom with no apps installed (except the system apps and the Benchmark app of course).
So if you have the time and will, do a quick benchmark before you restore your apps next time you flash a new rom and post the results here Please inform which app you used to test and what CPU frequencies as well
As I'm trying to find the max score for the different roms, you can post your results for ROMs allready listed as well.
Update: If every1 could do Benchmark with max frequence 576 MHz it would've been great, makes it easier to compare
At 576 MHz:
SalsaSense RC1
Linpack single: 2.535
Linpack multi:2.811
Quadrant: 310
Antutu: 806
Floyo 1.4pre1
Linpack single: 4.206
Quadrant: 369
Elelinux GB v2.7
Antutu: 776
Quadrant 359
Linpack single:4.998
Linpack multi: 3.637
Neocore: 49.8
At 710 MHz
Floyo1.4pre1
Linpack single: 5.063
Linpack multi: 4.993
Quadrant: 399
Cronos GB 710 MHz
Quadrant:449
Elelinux GB 2.7 710 MHz
antutu benchmark 863
quadrant 403
linpack single thread 4.74
linpack multi thread 4.604
neocore 52.6
At other:
Floyo 1.4pre1 691 MHz:
Linpack: 4.9
Quadrant: 370
THC Bandit 729.6 MHz:
Quadrant: 308
Neocore: 62.5
Please note that for now some of the results are from clean roms, and others with lots of apps installed. Therefore it doesn't show it the right way. However I hope that we after some time will have all the roms max performance Also note that I haven't done all these tests. I can't guarantee that the numbers here aren't random numbers who popped into someones head, so don't blame me
on my own hatc salsa port i get with :
quadrant 308
neocore (bugged) like 59.3 till 62.5
stroobach said:
on my own hatc salsa port i get with :
quadrant 308
neocore (bugged) like 59.3 till 62.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, what CPU frequencies did you use?
on cronos gingerbread overclock to 710 i got 449 on quadrant
A little update to OP. Sorry to u guys who allready posted, but will mash the thanks button for u
Habarug said:
Thanks, what CPU frequencies did you use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
smartass 176 - 729.6
Elelinux gingerbread
antutu benchmark 776. 863 at 710
quadrant 359 403 at 710
linpack single thread 3.998. 4.74 at 710
linpack multi thread 3.637 4.604 at 710
neocore 49.8. 52.6 at 710

Xperia S low nenamark 2 Score

Hello all,
I own Sony Xperia S rooted Stock ICS 4.0.4
No overclocking. RAM around 220 mb
I read in nenamark 2 web and other site that said SXS in nenamark2 is above 35 fps (37 - 38 fps)
However i only got 29 fps (not even reach 30 fps)
hxxp://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/152/screenshot2012081410161.png/
I play tintin HD and Modern combat 3 (both not cracked), and it stutter.
Is this normal? or my GPU has problem?
Thank you!

new adreno libs for x10i ???

Hi everyone , I have a question are there any new drivers for aderno for x10i ? actually i have Wolfbreak Xperia DooMKernel and i Antutu benchmark shows score in 2D - 219 in 3D - 226 ;/ my old x8 shows better score, whats wrong? which have best performance?
habinek said:
Hi everyone , I have a question are there any new drivers for aderno for x10i ? actually i have Wolfbreak Xperia DooMKernel and i Antutu benchmark shows score in 2D - 219 in 3D - 226 ;/ my old x8 shows better score, whats wrong? which have best performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah , x8 is a little better in 2D ,3D tests because of lower LCD resolution comparing to x10
If you're on an ics rom you can install new qualcomm libs, it increased my 2d score two times higher & 3d score increased about 5 percent
Tip: update your antutu app cause whole scoring system has been changed
#sorry for my English
Sent from my BEAST, I mean X8
thanks i have the lastest version of antutu , but maybe i change rom
jay-z-s said:
If you're on an ics rom you can install new qualcomm libs, it increased my 2d score two times higher & 3d score increased about 5 percent
Tip: update your antutu app cause whole scoring system has been changed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been musing over this for some time.
I have an XPERIA X10i using Standard GB 2.3.3, DooMKernel v6 (O/C 1113-1152MHz) and an XPERIA S feature pack.
With a heavily tweaked build.prop with hardware acceleration set. video.accelerate.hw=1 etc, etc.
My X10i GB 2.3.3 AnTuTu v3.0.3 gives:
2D Graphics: 236
3D Graphics: 469
NenaMark2: 8.4fps
Epic Citadel Benchmark: 11.2fps @854x480 on performance
Yes, it wouldn't really be playable on an XPERIA X10i but the benchmark does have it's uses given the graphics environment
and besides, it looks pretty while benchmarking even with the major lag/freezes... .
My X10i JB 4.1.2 AnTuTu v3.0.3 gives:
2D Graphics: 265
3D Graphics: 764
NenaMark2: 11fps
Epic Citadel Benchmark: ????
Now the Jelly Bean v4.1.2 Graphics figures imply a marked improvement and one would expect this to translate into improvements in video and gaming. However this is not the case for the video tests I have done, as I have not been able to enable HW acceleration using BSPlayer and/or MX Player Pro in the Jelly Bean build(s) I have tested.
Viewing a 720p mkv video in JB 4.1.2 on an XPERIA X10i lags terribly and only uses SW encoding.
If I understand this correctly, this means writing a new set of Adreno 200 GPU drivers (please correct me if I'm wrong)
This may be beyond the scope of developers based on time, effort and benefits/return when there are other/bigger fish to fry.
At the moment on GB 2.3.3, I can watch a 720p mkv 6ch (approx 25fps) movie streamed from my NAS with HW/HW+ acceleration without problems and only the VERY slightest lag every now and then... sometimes not at all.. Push that out to 1080i/1080p and it hangs or resets the video player or just doesn't play
So with the information and current knowledge I have, I seem to be restricted to GB 2.3.3 for GPU HW support and watching videos/TV at 720p.
If we could get HW acceleration working with JB 4.1.2 on an XPERIA X10i.. well, I'd go off like a frog in a sock
With 'ICS ROM' on an X10i, does that give us GPU HW acceleration with the Adreno 200????????
Or are we just falling back on SW encoding???
Update: I just found this bit of info which does imply there is HW acceleration available with the Adreno 200 ICS ROM ... somewhere.
Forums - QSD 8250, Adreno 200 hardware-related proprietary libraries for hardware graphics acceleration
There is also reference to JB 4.1 in the Adreno 2xx driver sections, so this does bode well for JB 4.1 development on the XPERIA X10i... one hopes.
Hardware coding/decoding doesn't work on ics ,job that's why video recording , or video playback is lagging or even not working.
Qualcomm should release the source codes for ics,jb . They didn't released it & I don't think they will release in future.
-3D & 2D works & is accelerated in ics ,thats the reason of higher benchmark results
Sent from my BEAST, I mean X8

[Q] Fps uncap

hey everybody,
I'm a bit of a noob and i got a few questions...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1192867
there are screenshots in that thread that show that our X10 can get +- 50fps. But i never got that much .
I'm now on feralab V23 and with antutu i get scores of 2000 and a maximum of 19/20 fps.
I made screenshots from Antutu and Quadrant.
A friend of mine has a samsung galaxy gio. which has the same gpu the "Adreno 200".
(http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=2964&idPhone2=3741)
but his scores whith Antutu are over 4000 and mine are 2000.
So my question is , HOW is this possible why do whe have a cap on our fps?
maybe the i can finally have peace whith it.
thanks!!!!!
I get 54FPS on 2D graphics on GB 2.3.3 with DoomKernel v6
I can play a 720p .mkv (H264,AC3) video using BSPlayer or MX Player Pro with HW acceleration without any real noticeable lag (GB 2.3.3)
I can get an Antutu score of 4550 on CM10(JB 4.1.2) for XPERIA X10i, but this comes without 2D Adreno graphics HW acceleration and thus the 2D FPS are reduced to 43FPS and 720p videos are not really watchable.
If 2D hardware drivers are ever made available for the Adreno 200 on higher Android versions of the OS on the XPERIA X10i then we're really onto a winner.
FeraLab V22 and V23 only returns a high score using AnTuTu 3.0.3
Benchmarks for GB 2.3.3 and DoomKernel V6
ow wow!
really?... so i'm doing some terribly wrong then :silly:
well thanks for the reply!!!

Categories

Resources