Soo i happened to change my default launcher to launcher pro instead of sense. The Reslult? most benchmarks i found had a huge improvement, notably cfbench and nenemark. Just thought id pass this along to show those Galaxy SII snobs we can keep up on benchmarks even with a higher resolution
What app did you use to measure? I'd like to try one since I disabled pretty much every non essential package possible and running ADW Ex.
At x33 overclock, I get 13,000+ in CF. I never tried with Sense..
phatmanxxl said:
What app did you use to measure? I'd like to try once since I disabled pretty much every essential package possible and running ADW Ex.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use CFBench Or Nenamark. Ive had good results too from ANTUTU
I got overall 5163, don't know what that means, don't really care lol. Using CF Bench. Right there with the sensation. About 1300 under the SG2
Im sure over clocking and a fresh reboot would give it a significantly higher score.
phatmanxxl said:
I got overall 5163, don't know what that means, don't really care lol. Using CF Bench. Right there with the sensation. About 1300 under the SG2
Im sure over clocking and a fresh reboot would give it a significantly higher score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea Overclocking will put it over the SGII. Ill post a screenie soon
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Take that Samsung
Sent from my GX-9901-DX
Repost as.1st pic was bad
Sent from my GX-9901-DX
tuscani1821 said:
Repost as.1st pic was bad
Sent from my GX-9901-DX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both are bad. Just type the scores.
novanosis85 said:
Both are bad. Just type the scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MY device 12557 , 3303 , 7004
Samsung Galaxy S2 11255, 3234 , 6442
Htc Sensation 9041, 2597 , 5174
EVO3D> All
tuscani1821 said:
MY device 12557 , 3303 , 7004
Samsung Galaxy S2 11255, 3234 , 6442
Htc Sensation 9041, 2597 , 5174
EVO3D> All
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty nice
@op I don't really think throwing a launcher on a heavily bloated UI like sense 3.0 will improve scores that much if any...
But hey I've been wrong before
3D > iClone
nate420 said:
Pretty nice
@op I don't really think throwing a launcher on a heavily bloated UI like sense 3.0 will improve scores that much if any...
But hey I've been wrong before
3D > iClone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well when I look at the running processes sense is not running which I think is why I'm getting better scores
Sent from my GX-9901-DX
tuscani1821 said:
Soo i happened to change my default launcher to launcher pro instead of sense. The Reslult? most benchmarks i found had a huge improvement, notably cfbench and nenemark. Just thought id pass this along to show those Galaxy SII snobs we can keep up on benchmarks even with a higher resolution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
btw... once you have a different launcer installed, you can go into TiBu and freeze (i uninstall) alllll the sense stuff... Not some of the frameworks... But in doing this you get a HUGE memory reduction, as well as sell CPU activity.
Tilde88 said:
btw... once you have a different launcer installed, you can go into TiBu and freeze (i uninstall) alllll the sense stuff... Not some of the frameworks... But in doing this you get a HUGE memory reduction, as well as sell CPU activity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed thanks for the tip. Gonna do that now
Sent from my GX-9901-DX
tuscani1821 said:
Well when I look at the running processes sense is not running which I think is why I'm getting better scores
Sent from my GX-9901-DX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense isn't just the launcher and a few apps
It's almost all in the framework and service.jar file
The notification bar
The app drawer (obviously changed if you have a launcher)
A lot more than you may realize
3D > iClone
tuscani1821 said:
Take that Samsung
Sent from my GX-9901-DX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ma glasses!
I got this with sense. Pretty nice I think.
DDD-EVO
This is true i tried with all three launchers and here is the scores
sense 3.0 =1942
go launcher=2139
launcher pro=2242
Related
i was watching the phonedog.com dogfight between the Gnote and the iP 4s (no surprise the Gnote wins )
anyways, he ran the Quadrant Standard Edition so i went and installed it....his test came out to 2396. i ran the same test and mine came out to 3223. i wonder why there was such a difference? perhaps he hadn't rebooted his in awhile. i have no widgets running, perhaps that is why.
please share yours
~3300 stock, ~3800 overclocked to 1.83GHz
I don't get it. Highest ive gotten so far is like 2745. I have mine rooted with clock mod installed but on stock rom. How are you guys hitting 3,000 e on the stock rom.
Ive done all the clear RAM, reboot, & kill off backround tasks. I need more speeeeeeed! LOL>
nice jjc!
Vcolassi said:
I don't get it. Highest ive gotten so far is like 2745. I have mine rooted with clock mod installed but on stock rom. How are you guys hitting 3,000 e on the stock rom.
Ive done all the clear RAM, reboot, & kill off backround tasks. I need more speeeeeeed! LOL>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
idk m8. hopefully someone will reply with an idea. i am interested in knowing why we all have diff #'s when we have stock rom.
do you have a widget(s) running?
Rooted, stock, frozen bloat. Fast as hell.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA App
ARTAQaf said:
nice jjc!
idk m8. hopefully someone will reply with an idea. i am interested in knowing why we all have diff #'s when we have stock rom.
do you have a widget(s) running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope no widgets. I'll have to try and freeze some more bloat.
Use setcpu, and use scaling performance so that it's truly running at 1.5GHz. Samsung uses "on-demand" speed scaling, so when you test, there's a chance it might be running at less than 1.5 if it hasn't scaled up to 1.5 yet
I'm running stock ROM (only rooted), CWM b4 recovery, and Da_G overclock kernel
Dont just freeze bloat uninstall it! I never freeze it.
i'm running stock everything except i run an installed Launcher. why would mine be higher than some others? does rooting slow it down?
here is my benchmark.
Using GO launcher, 6 home screens, 11 widgets - WidgetLocker Running in background w/ beautiful widgets.
SauROM w/ DaG kernel overclocked - 1.83 ghz - V6 supercharger script 1000+hp
My setCPU is 1.83 on "performance" setting (yes it makes a difference).
*Also, used RomToolboxPro to change i/o scheduler to Deadline and increase SD read write from 128kb to 3072kb...
Here is mine running Saurom with Da G kernal. Clock is at 1566mhz.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
ARTAQaf said:
i was watching the phonedog.com dogfight between the Gnote and the iP 4s (no surprise the Gnote wins )
anyways, he ran the Quadrant Standard Edition so i went and installed it....his test came out to 2396. i ran the same test and mine came out to 3223. i wonder why there was such a difference? perhaps he hadn't rebooted his in awhile. i have no widgets running, perhaps that is why.
please share yours
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couple things here, and by no means am I an Apple fan to ANY degree, but....
4S is close to year old technology, so comparing it to a brand new superphone like the Note (even the Skyrocket which has been to market for a couple months now) is silly. I generally like Phonedog and was genuinely surprised that guy would even compare the two devices. It sets a really silly precedent because 8 months from now, he'll likely make the same comparison between the Note and the Iphone5 which just might be similarly unfair, in the other direction.
Also, Quadrant is very nearly fraudulent in terms of its usefulness in showing the "actual" speed of a device, in a real-world sense, so I take ANY statement that starts or ends with Quadrant benchmarking with a huge truckload of salt.
Just my take...
-Ryan
borijess said:
Here is mine running Saurom with Da G kernal. Clock is at 1566mhz.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey did you see somewhere on here, there is a guy whos getting 3999? wonder what he has.
CWM b4, Da_G's Oc Kernel, Saurom, and a lot of bloatware uninstall.
CPU set to "Performance" 1.83ghz = 3900.
DA_g kernel, OC to 1.782, on demand, no reset and no ram clear. Wanted to see what it would if i was to do the test in real world situation (like showing off to friends);-)
Sent from a Galaxy far, far away!
Lol...how many benchmark threads are we going to start....I think there are 4 or 5 now
Sent from my SGH-I717R using XDA App
Running saurom with Da G overclocked kernel clocked @ 1.782
Sent from my SGH-I717R using XDA Premium App
3930 at 1.83
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
ARTAQaf said:
nice jjc!
idk m8. hopefully someone will reply with an idea. i am interested in knowing why we all have diff #'s when we have stock rom.
do you have a widget(s) running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have stock at&t note and get 3200-3300. If I don't clear the RAM, i get 2300-2700. So, just got to task manager, ram tab, and clear the memory, then use quadrant.
3203 Stock the way it comes setup.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...GwsMSwxLDIxMiwiY29tLmltYW5naS50ZW1wbGVydW4iXQ..
The only one legit link ^
Yes, Temple Run is finally available for Android.
In case you haven't know what Temple Run is, Temple Run is a simple tilt running based game.
It's a 3D game in which you run from a bunch of monkeys and jump from a temple to a temple.
It's endless and most addictive game ever released.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It lags a bit on Defy, but this is just the first version...
Doesnt lag at all for me
Sent from my MB525 using xda premium
Works fine and awesome game but crashes when I select Run Again for the second time
It lags on my defy as well. Running CM7.2.
Chinu9 said:
Doesnt lag at all for me
Sent from my MB525 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you haven't played it on iPhone....
I measured, on iPhone 4S you get about 70 fps, and the maximum on Android phones is 37fps (on SGS2)...
I believe that the crashing is on GB roms cause on every ICS rom I've tried today it doesnt crash.
awesum njoyed playing on my frnds ipod finaly for droid
mihovil13 said:
Then you haven't played it on iPhone....
I measured, on iPhone 4S you get about 70 fps, and the maximum on Android phones is 37fps (on SGS2)...
I believe that the crashing is on GB roms cause on every ICS rom I've tried today it doesnt crash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have an iphone 3G and i doubt its compatible..well it feels good on my defy..totally playable
Sent from my MB525 using xda premium
30fps is more than fine
Sent from my MB526 using XDA
mihovil13 said:
I measured, on iPhone 4S you get about 70 fps, and the maximum on Android phones is 37fps (on SGS2)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you measured fps in-game?
Well I ran this game on my defy (WIUI at 1 ghz) and it never lagged and not even a single force close
h1manshu said:
How did you measured fps in-game?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've modified the apk, and I was given the instructures by Imangi studios by email what lines should i change to set set_fps=1...then just resigned it and installed...
also, there's a SS from SGS2 from Imangi that shows 37 FPS as max on SGS24G
im running this on MS2 ginger3 with chainfire 3d and no crashing
great fun
mihovil13 said:
I've modified the apk, and I was given the instructures by Imangi studios by email what lines should i change to set set_fps=1...then just resigned it and installed...
also, there's a SS from SGS2 from Imangi that shows 37 FPS as max on SGS24G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You wouldn't be able to share the apk would you?
The lower fps is definitely noticeable on my GNote. ALOT smoother and ALOT more responsive on my iPad. Quite frustrating! Sometimes my gestures don't get recognized, and I die.
Hi score on iPad is around 800K, where as on my Note, I can't even reach 300K! Hope there's an update soon...
It lags on my defy (GGL ROM)
Edit: it works without lag in MIUI/CM7/CM9. So it was GGL ROM which sucked.
Works ok on my defy, withouy any lag or crash. (cm7, oc 1300 mhz)
This game is sooo nice
Works fine in my phone (Defy red lense with CM7 Defy+ Nightly)
It works nice in my defy very smooth no force close 800mhz
Awesome thnx
Sent from my MB526 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
good
very good game!!
no lagg on my Defy (CM7.2)
i recommend this game everybody
Jay-Taicho said:
Hi score on iPad is around 800K, where as on my Note, I can't even reach 300K! Hope there's an update soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never played this game before and heard about it only 20 days ago. Played it and its the best ever game I played on mobile. About the score, just 3 days of playing and my highest score is 1.7 milllion
And yes, I play it on my lovely defy.
hopefully someone can help me understand...i run quadrant and its only showing 1 core...i know the amaze is dual core...how do u manage this?
mylz1122 said:
hopefully someone can help me understand...i run quadrant and its only showing 1 core...i know the amaze is dual core...how do u manage this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the second core is on demand you can use system tuner to force all cores online to get better performance
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my iced out HTC Ruby
mylz1122 said:
hopefully someone can help me understand...i run quadrant and its only showing 1 core...i know the amaze is dual core...how do u manage this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's right (TGamble160 that is) there are some benefits of forcing the second core but it's not the best thing you should do for your device, the second processor is designed to provide loading process but forcing the second core to run all the time can over heat the device and cause damage that can't be repaired.
I actually came here to check out how people felt about the Amaze and to see if it was worth getting but I thought I would throw that bit of information out there because I've already had a device bork out because my neighbor loved the speed and didn't think to turn it off resulting in the burnt out paper weight.
After updating to ICS I noticed that is uses both cores fairly often and seems to be a LOT faster. It's already quick so I dont see a need to force it run both at all times.
Big help...I must say the more I have this phone the more I like it...super fast and smooth...I'm running the new revolution ice and its smooth as butter...
tgamble160 said:
the second core is on demand you can use system tuner to force all cores online to get better performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you force the 2nd core in System tuner?
ce3jay said:
how do you force the 2nd core in System tuner?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first you must have root....in sytem tuner select cpu option....then boot setting...then force all cpus....works like a dream
if you set system tuner to on demand it does not overheat the phone it still slows the processors when not being used but has them both ready for when they are needed. i keep both online on demand and my phone runs awesome! no overheating and still great battery life. however i set it to performance and the phone is blazing fast but does get warm and battery is gone in a flash.
tgamble160 said:
if you set system tuner to on demand it does not overheat the phone it still slows the processors when not being used but has them both ready for when they are needed. i keep both online on demand and my phone runs awesome! no overheating and still great battery life. however i set it to performance and the phone is blazing fast but does get warm and battery is gone in a flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does setcpu have the same capability as system tuner? I mean forcing the 2nd cpu to run?
mylz1122 said:
first you must have root....in sytem tuner select cpu option....then boot setting...then force all cpus....works like a dream
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh thats where the setting is. I must have overlooked the options last time. Thanks button clicked for ya =)
edit:
Is it also possible to change the min/max of the 2nd core? cpu0 is at 192mhz, while the 2nd core stays at the default 384mhz even with the slider all the way down. thanks.
bangsters said:
does setcpu have the same capability as system tuner? I mean forcing the 2nd cpu to run?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it does not that I know of. I always used setcpu on my g2x never saw the option to force both
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
IMG]http://img.tapatalk.com/d03628c4-e8a2-ec3b.jpg[/IMG]
System tuner is better and for those of you wondering about ics running both cores...
Sent from my iced out HTC Ruby
sdsa
glacierguy said:
IMG]http://img.tapatalk.com/d03628c4-e8a2-ec3b.jpg[/IMG]
System tuner is better and for those of you wondering about ics running both cores...
Sent from my iced out HTC Ruby
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS doesn't run on both cores? So why the f*** has htc given dual core system in it?
I am rooting and forcing them both.
imran1000 said:
ICS doesn't run on both cores? So why the f*** has htc given dual core system in it?
I am rooting and forcing them both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read the thread completely? The second core is used when needed. Otherwise single core is used to save battery.
imran1000 said:
ICS doesn't run on both cores? So why the f*** has htc given dual core system in it?
I am rooting and forcing them both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reviving a thread so old that u quoted GlacierGuy who doesnt even exist any more LMFAO
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
I found my old galaxy S last night and thought I would run a quick benchmark using Quadrant against my galaxy S2. As you would expect the S2 overal beat the S1... apart from 3D performance. It was only a few marks faster but the S1 did out perform. This was noticeable on the gpu section where they is a planet revolving around the frame rate was almost double that of the s2. Both phones are running ginger bread 2.3.5 @ stock
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
First of all, look at all the things you have running in the background on the S2.
Second thing, you're probably running the android 4 optimized version of quadrant on the s2 and the old gb version on the s1.
Install the newest on both. Reboot them both. Test then.
If you still have problems go into settings->applications->running and see what's slowing down your phone.
It's propably because the software runs more efficient on the S1.
Also who cares about benchmarks anyways? There aren't any apps out there for the S2 which have good graphics or bring the processors to its limits. Name me one which does that.
Ive now come to the conclusion the quadrant simply is **** :d
ics 3D perf gone up but 2d dropped dramatically obviously far too software limited.
My goodness that notification bar is packed
same here my eyes were on the noti bar ,,its full.
victorator said:
First of all, look at all the things you have running in the background on the S2.
Second thing, you're probably running the android 4 optimized version of quadrant on the s2 and the old gb version on the s1.
Install the newest on both. Reboot them both. Test then.
If you still have problems go into settings->applications->running and see what's slowing down your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow the replies are either fanboyism or just honest ignorance and mistakes.
First of all he is running the same current version on both.
All those things running in the background are actually on the S1 not the S2...
Frozenthunder said:
It's propably because the software runs more efficient on the S1.
Also who cares about benchmarks anyways? There aren't any apps out there for the S2 which have good graphics or bring the processors to its limits. Name me one which does that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not just quadrant standard that shows this. I have consistently been dissapointed with the SGS2 3d perf in general.
Name one?
Jet car stunts runs worse on the SGS2 and looks worse than on the SGS1.
The SGS2 refresh rate is also lower making games run worse.
IF you look at sysetm information, CUBE MAPS and CROSSBAR COMBINED not supported on the SGS2. Everything supported on the SGS1.
Personal experience, a lot of 3D games run much nicer and look nicer on the SGS1.
Really disappointed withe SGS2 screen and 3D perf.
The SGS 2 has a Mali gpu, while the SGS 1 has a PowerVR gpu. Theoretically SGS 2 should be faster but because of architecture differences it may behave worse under conditions that favour the PowerVR. I have not had problems with my SGS 2 being slow but I have not played really demanding games yet.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
DramatikBeats said:
My goodness that notification bar is packed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's because that phone hasn't been switched on for a ages and it also has no Sim so when I turned it on things like Ebay spring up with old messages
Sent from my GT-I9100P using XDA
Emexrulsier said:
It's because that phone hasn't been switched on for a ages and it also has no Sim so when I turned it on things like Ebay spring up with old messages
Sent from my GT-I9100P using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for benchmark u can try Antutu app over Qadrant app since it gives more accurate results over and above Quadrant one
is normal to have such a low number in my verizon lg g3. g2 below lg?I tested 3 times
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
sorry for my language
Mine scores a 35453. I notice your battery is at 19%, do you have battery saver enabled? That would be my bet as to the discrepancy.
CapitanFantasma said:
is normal to have such a low number in my verizon lg g3. g2 below lg?I tested 3 times
sorry for my language
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm also getting slow scores such as yourself. I figured I should be getting 35k+ but nope only 30k. Be sure to update this thread of you get it figured out.
Thanks
samg77 said:
I'm also getting slow scores such as yourself. I figured I should be getting 35k+ but nope only 30k. Be sure to update this thread of you get it figured out.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What widgets and apps do you still have running in the background? That affects performance. I have bloat disabled and I can routinely get 35K and above. Highest score was 37K.
Benchmarks mean nothing if you don't know the exact state of the device.
I just tested mine and got 34222 as my score. Still a little slower than my HTC One M8.
the G3 throttles back really easily. Unless it's been sitting idle for a while or you've disabled throttling, you won't get 35k+. see this
steelersmb said:
I just tested mine and got 34222 as my score. Still a little slower than my HTC One M8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about what I just got with Dalvik, but only 28,213 with ART enabled.
Did a factory restore just for kicks.
Quadrant Standard 13918
Antutu 25554
After about 3 mins in the fridge....
Quadrant 23926
Antutu 35001
Temp throttling holds true......
New update
Stock g3 non rooted
Mine is 28459. All bloatware is disabled. My device was fully charged. All apps except Nova launcher are greenified.
Sent from my Rooted VS985
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There we go, finally optimized for the G3.
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What xposed tweaks are these?
Can we revisit this thread...I've been jumping back and forth between my G2 and G3 and in every day use, I find the G2 to be much snappier. Of course I'm running XDABEBB on my G2 and stock rooted on my G3...but the G2 is noticeably quicker. It looks like the benchmarks are showing that the performance of the G3 is being hampered by something. What am I missing here? While I like the G3, I can't figure out why it performs worse than the G2.
ouch1976 said:
Can we revisit this thread...I've been jumping back and forth between my G2 and G3 and in every day use, I find the G2 to be much snappier. Of course I'm running XDABEBB on my G2 and stock rooted on my G3...but the G2 is noticeably quicker. It looks like the benchmarks are showing that the performance of the G3 is being hampered by something. What am I missing here? While I like the G3, I can't figure out why it performs worse than the G2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The display. Same 801 processor having to push that many more pixels. Although, I recall watching a video of the G3 Alpha(I think it's called Alpha, it's the G3 variant with an 805) and it didn't perform all that much better than the non 805 G3.
EvoRocker said:
The display. Same 801 processor having to push that many more pixels. Although, I recall watching a video of the G3 Alpha(I think it's called Alpha, it's the G3 variant with an 805) and it didn't perform all that much better than the non 805 G3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Newer, faster clocked chip with another gig of ram...I would happily sacrifice some pixels for a quicker experience...it reminds me of the Asus Transformer Prime vs the Transformer Infinity...the older version was better in my opinion...
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm getting in the 40K-42K range also.
Not sure what the G2 gets in this benchmark.
it would be nice if you guys could edit the img out of your replies.
really sux scrolling through this huge ass screen shot repeatedly.
thanks