Wondering if I can get a bit more info on kernels. I'm new to it but I wanna flash glitch's new kernel to use with my CM7. Any suggestions or tutorials? Like I said I'm a noob. I already got the kernel cleaner thing but i'm hesitant to try flashing the kernel cause I don't fully understand how to maintain it with voltage control and what not.
Thanks,
Shakeandscream
shakeandscream said:
Wondering if I can get a bit more info on kernels. I'm new to it but I wanna flash glitch's new kernel to use with my CM7. Any suggestions or tutorials? Like I said I'm a noob. I already got the kernel cleaner thing but i'm hesitant to try flashing the kernel cause I don't fully understand how to maintain it with voltage control and what not.
Thanks,
Shakeandscream
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Firstly, we have a Q & A sections please remember that. Secondly, you don't have to maintain anything with either voltage control or pimp my cpu those are only there for further tweaks.
If you want to flash this kernel and be on the safe side just wipe cache, davik cache, voltage settings, to be on the safe side, and then flash Glitch's kernel it's quite simple. You should be up and running after that.
Junkboy0 said:
Firstly, we have a Q & A sections please remember that. Secondly, you don't have to maintain anything with either voltage control or pimp my cpu those are only there for further tweaks.
If you want to flash this kernel and be on the safe side just wipe cache, davik cache, voltage settings, to be on the safe side, and then flash Glitch's kernel it's quite simple. You should be up and running after that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay I flashed it and it seems to be working fine. My phone is smoother as well, and I did install voltage control just in case, but I don't plan on using it.
Also, sorry I keep forgetting we have a Q & A section. I will post any further questions I have there. Thanks a bunch.
I will first politely suggest using the search function, as there are several comprehensive guides available on / related to your question. I also recommend using only the Q&A and (though it's apparently a grey area) General boards for any non-development-related questions. This allows the devs to have a board where they can focus exclusively on their projects. That's a pretty important rule here, so you may get a bit of flak; as a greenhorn myself, my advice to you is to use the dev section as an observational resource until you've gained some experience and comfort with the essentials. In the meantime though, don't hesitate to help the devs by hitting the Thanks button whenever they give you something awesome. That said, check the stickies for this and the other Fascinate boards; they contain the wisdom you seek
EDIT: It's also good practice to actually hit the "submit" button before passing out and going from "potentially helpful" to "redundant echo..."
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Jazz848 said:
I will first politely suggest using the search function, as there are several comprehensive guides available on / related to your question. I also recommend using only the Q&A and (though it's apparently a grey area) General boards for any non-development-related questions. This allows the devs to have a board where they can focus exclusively on their projects. That's a pretty important rule here, so you may get a bit of flak; as a greenhorn myself, my advice to you is to use the dev section as an observational resource until you've gained some experience and comfort with the essentials. In the meantime though, don't hesitate to help the devs by hitting the Thanks button whenever they give you something awesome. That said, check the stickies for this and the other Fascinate boards; they contain the wisdom you seek
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me thinks we only need one person saying "wrong post!" But I have to admit, that was an awesome explanation for n00bs.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Yeah... I MIGHT have passed out for a minute or 50 before hitting "Submit." Obsessive re-writes and / or moderate vodka may not have helped the situation...
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
If you are testing 3rd party kernels I do recommend that you don't save your voltage settings unless they're ultra conservative. In my experience even little changes can cause problems.
Related
Just as the title says...Can we now?
Which problems? This build is the same ED01 build we found a few days ago.
Doubt it will make a huge difference. Its nearly the same as EC01.
Sent from a Limited Edition phone from a Premium app..
Check out evil fascination rom. Pretty nice, based on what I believe to be the same build sent ota tonight. Thats as good as it gets right now imo.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
How about you fix them yourself Or be a little less impatient and a little more grateful of how much work these dudes do for us.
finakechi said:
How about you fix them yourself Or be a little less impatient and a little more grateful of how much work these dudes do for us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's just asking a simple question. No need to answer that way.
Yes, it IS true that there probably isn't MUCH of a difference between this and EC01...
However, this is what I was waiting on to update my ROM, personally, so I will be doing this in the next few days. As for what other developers would like to do, that is a personal choice, they may simply not see any reason to and won't.
So besides those like me who make the choice to do anything with it, you probably won't see anything happen. Just keep in mind that just because it is official doesn't really make it any better than what we have at this moment. I haven't explored it yet, but that is my opinion on the matter.
DirgeExtinction said:
He's just asking a simple question. No need to answer that way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When the OP cannot understand simple forum rules I see no reason to censor comments made towards him *edit* unless the intention is to "flame" said user.
This is a question, not a ROM or anything being DEVELOPED and it has no place here.
Now say if this were asked in Q and A I would see your reasoning at being a little harsh.
gkirby11 said:
When the OP cannot understand simple forum rules I see no reason to censor comments made towards him.
This is a question, not a ROM or anything being DEVELOPED and it has no place here.
Now say if this were asked in Q and A I would see no reason to be slightly harsh .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my frozen yogurt filled fascinate
also most people want aosp,cm fixes and this will not help them, the stuff they want fixed is tied to tw which had been stated hundreds of times.
SC2.9.2 Voodoo Eclipse
Something to that effect (Touchwiz source doesn't help AOSP so much) should honestly be stickied to the top of the development forum, although I doubt that would help that much anyway with the type of people who post these threads...
People don't remember how long it took for JT to even get a good Eclair AOSP build working. I think it's somewhat clear that Samsung's releases are not terribly useful for AOSP ROMs.
gkirby11 said:
When the OP cannot understand simple forum rules I see no reason to censor comments made towards him *edit* unless the intention is to "flame" said user.
This is a question, not a ROM or anything being DEVELOPED and it has no place here.
Now say if this were asked in Q and A I would see your reasoning at being a little harsh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I really think that mods should temp-ban these people who just post wherever they want.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
We don't have everything we need from Samsung. Stop asking. It's been said already.
times_infinity said:
We don't have everything we need from Samsung. Stop asking. It's been said already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats all folks!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Sorry I just think it's a little rude to post this in the Development forum is exclamation points and CAPS!!! It came off very "ugh why do these dev roms have so many problems can we just get them fixed? GAWD!"...to me. I am not a developer but I am very aware that it is not nearly as simple to do what they do as some people seem to think. Maybe I over reacted a little, but that type of attitude pisses me off.
Guy can we make little pool. What is best kernel and what version battery wise in your opinion? i m prety sure there is alot of people asking this question. You can just say name of kernel and version. thank you
Send from my SG2-i777 using XDA Premium App
No, try them yourself.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Had you spent a little time searching you would have found this thread already in progress and a number of similar threads already closed.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1511725
Miami_Son said:
Had you spent a little time searching you would have found this thread already in progress and a number of similar threads already closed.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1511725
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya. This thread is gonna get closed. There's really only 2 kernel options so it's not that hard to try them both out.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Its not same. Other thread is more details whats disabled what apps you using and **** i dont care what you use i want to know what version of the kernel seem to be best battery wise. DO NOT post in here unless you posting kernel and version.
Send from my SG2-i777 using XDA Premium App
Go try for yourself ROM 1.1 and wow people are ignorant kernel 2.6.
EDIT: PUTTING HELPFUL STUFF HERE?
Each persons use and what the expect of the phone is different. If you have wakelocks keeping your phone awake due to a rogue app, you will have less of a battery life than others. Asking people what they use is like asking what browser they use. Some might be better than others but it depends on what you like and what you are used to.
Oh and if something makes a difference, look at the amounts of thanks compared to the # of posts... and he even has a "GIVE ME THANKS" sig.... If you have to ASK for thanks, something is wrong with you.
Entropy512s kernel is basically legendary for how good it is. I've read people love 12/8, and 2/07 I believe and a few others. I use his latest.
I've read Siyah is good too, people claim better battery live on 2.6.8 and 2.6.9.
I wouldn't say either is "best" but I prefer Entropys. It's smooth and comes with CWM verses the, I believe, redpill in Siyah.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Kernel alone has little to do with battery life. There are so many factors affecting battery usage that the premise of your question is worthless and is the reason these kinds of threads get closed. They serve no purpose. As was said, try them for yourself because that's the ONLY way you will find what works best for you, your phone and the way you use it. There are no shortcuts in this regard.
Does anyone have a step by step guide to setup a kernel development environment for the HTC Flyer.
I am new to this and I cannot get the environment setup correctly
Please someone help or does anyone have an image of there dev machine
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Anyone??
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Start searching. If you can't find the info yourself, then you probably aren't going to do much good as a kernel "dev". Also read up on GPL, they are getting stricter about it around here and as such there are rules as to what you can post ROM/kernel wise. I would avoid any kitchens, and do it all from scratch. I'll give you two links though.
Toolchain: https://github.com/DooMLoRD/android_prebuilt_toolchains
Source: http://www.htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
That and a Ubuntu machine are all you need to get going. Just as a warning, takinga image of somebody's dev machine, and then pulling Leedroid's or Doomlord's source code and compiling is not building your own kernel. Start from scratch, google, search, learn and it's going to take a bit. I'd start with adding some extra CPU governor's if I were you, it's the easiest.
Oh and I'd wait more then two hours next time before bumping my own post, also google is a amazing thing. Did you try it.
http://forums.androidcentral.com/ht...how-build-your-own-kernel-package-source.html
Some very nice and helpfull thoughts there.
First steps r always hard. With proper help they can get much easyer. U prolly wouldnt be walking if u wouldnt recive a help from your parents.
Ioiwillioi asked for help. He said he is new in kernel developing. He said he is having some problems with seting up. I am sure he is mature enought he knows for web search.
Not all ppl like to build their knewladge base up from scratch with no help... After all we all benefit on other ppl knewladge and take shortcuts... If u dont feel same then burn all books, cut off internet and do all from scratch.
Google search has some disadvantages as well not onlly Google knows it all syndrome...
Now if u can help him with going faster in proces please do.
Help or stfu?
Fake edit: IoiWilliI that bump... u siriuslly could do it faster lol
ninja edit:
IoiWillloI is Sensles HC rom developer. I seen first post at his early atempts:
"With all due respect, but adding an APK, swapping some files etc., is not an useful contribution for the community. If you really want to add something, work on ICS instead We need more developers on that case, and it would be more useful than 10 HoneyComb ROMs"
Today some belive his rom is best HC rom for Flyer. Gl IoiWillioI with growing in kernel developing skilz.
You seriously think my post is unhelpful? If so I'm more then happy to delete it buddy.
thewadegeek said:
You seriously think my post is unhelpful? If so I'm more then happy to delete it buddy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I appreciate the help wadegeek however you could be a little bit more supportive, so far i have stuck to ROM stuff and even if i do say so myself i have done quite a good job, and i though rather than google it i thought i would ask in the forum that was designed for the device, (in case of any device specific requirements etc) i mean thats just logical thinking :O
I dont think jprednik meant any offense
Also thank you for all of the positive comments and feedback jprednik,
EDIT: Its my post i'll bump when i want to
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
ioiwillioi said:
I appreciate the help wadegeek however you could be a little bit more supportive, so far i have stuck to ROM stuff and even if i do say so myself i have done quite a good job, and i though rather than google it i thought i would ask in the forum that was designed for the device, (in case of any device specific requirements etc) i mean thats just logical thinking :O
I dont think jprednik meant any offense
Also thank you for all of the positive comments and feedback jprednik,
EDIT: Its my post i'll bump when i want to
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am being supportive, I'm just saying if you take some to look it up on your own you'll get to the exact sameplace. Also I believe spamming is against the forum rules, which was why I mentioned the post bumping. It wasn't really needed.
Sent from my SCH-R760 using Tapatalk 2
thewadegeek said:
I am being supportive,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you're not. You're being the opposite of supportive.
Its not a step by step, but this thread on the Nook Color 3.0 for ICS Kernel development has some insights into what it takes.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1677219&highlight=kernel
Ok, THIS supportive enough?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748297
And I answered all his questions. Being supportive does not equal babying him(or her...I think your a him).
helpfull
thx and yes i believe thats helpfull and suportive.
thewadegeek said:
Ok, THIS supportive enough?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748297
And I answered all his questions. Being supportive does not equal babying him(or her...I think your a him).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Thanks.
thewadegeek said:
Start searching. If you can't find the info yourself, then you probably aren't going to do much good as a kernel "dev". Also read up on GPL, they are getting stricter about it around here and as such there are rules as to what you can post ROM/kernel wise. I would avoid any kitchens, and do it all from scratch. I'll give you two links though.
Toolchain: https://github.com/DooMLoRD/android_prebuilt_toolchains
Source: http://www.htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
That and a Ubuntu machine are all you need to get going. Just as a warning, takinga image of somebody's dev machine, and then pulling Leedroid's or Doomlord's source code and compiling is not building your own kernel. Start from scratch, google, search, learn and it's going to take a bit. I'd start with adding some extra CPU governor's if I were you, it's the easiest.
Oh and I'd wait more then two hours next time before bumping my own post, also google is a amazing thing. Did you try it.
http://forums.androidcentral.com/ht...how-build-your-own-kernel-package-source.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right another question ,
Once i have the Zimage what do i have to do with it, i know about building it into a boot.img but when i flash my kernel the cpu values etc don't appear to change :/ is it something i need to specify in the .config prior to building or is it something i do in the process of zimage to boot.img ?
That would all be in the config file. Are you using LeeDroid's CPU frequency tables? And if you started your source from scratch, did you add anything to Kconfig? I would really need to take a look at your source, do you have a Github? Or can you post exactly what you changed?
thewadegeek said:
That would all be in the config file. Are you using LeeDroid's CPU frequency tables? And if you started your source from scratch, did you add anything to Kconfig? I would really need to take a look at your source, do you have a Github? Or can you post exactly what you changed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't change the kconfig :/ I can commit it to github later is that any good??
So the kernel compiles fine but there are no options to got about 1495 when trying to OC
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Yep get it into a github and I'll take a look to see if I can help. You will need to make some changes to the different configs though. And out of curiosity, which kernel did you pull your .config from? Or did you use a default from arch/arm/configs?
thewadegeek said:
Yep get it into a github and I'll take a look to see if I can help. You will need to make some changes to the different configs though. And out of curiosity, which kernel did you pull your .config from? Or did you use a default from arch/arm/configs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock HC config and will get it to got hub asap
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Ok, I won't be able to take a serious look until this evening though.
This post I think is going to be quite helpful in my attempt to swing a bat at this dev stuff... thanks for the info folks
if crpalmer's kernel is based of elkay's which is based on dsb9938's and it pulls some source from a few others how do we keep them all straight? is crpalmer's based on the newest revisions of both other kernels? we need a comparison chart containing all the features of each kernel highlighting the differences and similarities of each.
by the wording in crpalmer's thread, assuming it's based on all the recent submits, then it would be the most recent update especially considering it uses linux 3.4.31 when the others use lower versions. (unless there is an even newer one i havn't read yet)
KyJelly69 said:
if crpalmer's kernel is based of elkay's which is based on dsb9938's and it pulls some source from a few others how do we keep them all straight? is crpalmer's based on the newest revisions of both other kernels? we need a comparison chart containing all the features of each kernel highlighting the differences and similarities of each.
by the wording in crpalmer's thread, assuming it's based on all the recent submits, then it would be the most recent update especially considering it uses linux 3.4.31 when the others use lower versions. (unless there is an even newer one i havn't read yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So make a chart then.
beaups said:
So make a chart then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you clearly deserve a ribbon for most helpful.
If I knew what the differences were, or even how to find all of them, i would. but i sure as hell wouldn't share it with you.
KyJelly69 said:
you clearly deserve a ribbon for most helpful.
If I knew what the differences were, or even how to find all of them, i would. but i sure as hell wouldn't share it with you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's github links for each kernel in the their respective threads. I don't need a chart.
Now that's funny.
Then why are being a trolling ass? This topic obviously has nothing to do with you. This is the HELP section. If you want to be a jerk go do it in the dev section.
Now you get a gold star and your little buddy too.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
KyJelly69 said:
Then why are being a trolling ass? This topic obviously has nothing to do with you. This is the HELP section. If you want to be a jerk go do it in the dev section.
Now you get a gold star and your little buddy too.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody is being a jerk.
How can you come in here and say we "need" a chart? That would be a great way for you to contribute...
Instead, you pop off to the people who gave you the ability to run said custom kernels in the first place.
Nice.
beaups said:
Nobody is being a jerk.
How can you come in here and say we "need" a chart? That would be a great way for you to contribute...
Instead, you pop off to the people who gave you the ability to run said custom kernels in the first place.
Nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sure as hell aren't being very helpful in the help section. All you are doing is being a self-righteous ***** becuase you think i owe you something. That's what donatons are for. If you can't help the people that are asking for it in the help section then shut up and move on.
Saying "we need one" is just another way of asking if there is one. so, for clarity, is there a list of features comparing kernels? Maybe if I get a second between raising a family and curing cancer I'll teach myself github but as of now I don't know how. That's why I posted in the help section. At least I followed the rules and didn't ask in the dev section. Get over yourself.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
beaups said:
So make a chart then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly I was thinking the same thing. Take to bull by the horns OP. Not trying to be an a$$ but we would all have to dig through the information only the developers would really know what the differences are. Do it man!
You just assume I have the time and technical ability to do so. And, I didn't ask anybody to make one, only that we need/is there one.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
FYI, I wrote a high level summary of the differences in my kernel thread.
crpalmer said:
FYI, I wrote a high level summary of the differences in my kernel thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for pointing that out, I had to read through several pages to find it. But I was thinking more of a chart showing who's kernel has which parts from other's kernels. In the end it will probably never happen so at least thank you for that.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
If you're going to post to the forums please keep it respectful with each other.
As others have mentioned everyone should have a link to their github or respective sources in their OPs. Just go there and spend a few minutes browsing their recent activity tabs to see what all they've changed. But, if for some reason they're not providing their source please report the thread for violating GPL.
Thread Closed.
There are a plethora of kernals available for the i9300 but being a bit of a noob I'm wondering what the differences and benifits are in each...coding, features or otherwise?
I have personally being using WanamLite 4.1.2 roms for the past 8months or so, recently updating from LLA Tto MB5. And about two weeks before updating I switched from Siyah 1.8.9 to Boeffla 2.7-2.8 and personally found that battery life was improved. I'm still running Boeffla on MB5 however Wanam has now released his Adam kernal. I know other kernal are available but what are differences as I mentioned above.
Any info would be great guys.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
The differences are:
-battery life (as you've said) for kernels like phenomenal, hydrx-d (for example)
-sound improvements for kernels like boeffla
-speed
various kernels work differently on various sgs3's so just test em and choose which one you like more
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
kernEl
^
^
^
This ^
d4niven said:
There are a plethora of kernals available for the i9300 but being a bit of a noob I'm wondering what the differences and benifits are in each...coding, features or otherwise?
You can only read and try they all tell you what they claim to improve .
Best rom what rom what kernel posts are not allowed .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
Ahh ok I was wondering why I couldn't find much on this topic.
I'm not looking to be told which is the best or any form of heads up between kernals.
It's just often I see 'tweaked'. So I was hoping to find out in what way each kernal is tweaked and how will this affect things.
Just plain facts so people can make up their own mind.
Thought it would be good to have a centralised location for a discussion that covers this.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
It's worth having a really in depth look at the kernel threads, and following links to ie. Governors explained, and stuff like that, it takes a while to get to grips with it, but then half the fun is going through the learning process, finding the facts, building the picture, gaining understanding, the main point to note I'd that most custom kernels come with fully functioning and optimized default set up, so you don't need to do anything initially giving you tinge to figure out how all the functions effect performance.
As always reading lots is the key
d4niven said:
A
Just plain facts so people can make up their own mind.
Thought it would be good to have a centralised location for a discussion that covers this.
We have had that and it just gets into a my kernel is bigger then your kernel post .
Good idea then PM a mod and put it to them .
I will give my opinion none is better they are all much the same performance wise on SGS3 .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
slaphead20 said:
It's worth having a really in depth look at the kernel threads, and following links to ie. Governors explained, and stuff like that, it takes a while to get to grips with it, but then half the fun is going through the learning process, finding the facts, building the picture, gaining understanding, the main point to note I'd that most custom kernels come with fully functioning and optimized default set up, so you don't need to do anything initially giving you tinge to figure out how all the functions effect performance.
As always reading lots is the key
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JJEgan said:
d4niven said:
A
Just plain facts so people can make up their own mind.
Thought it would be good to have a centralised location for a discussion that covers this.
We have had that and it just gets into a my kernel is bigger then your kernel post .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been reading the kernal posts for a bit now but the definition of tweaks etc seemed a bit vague.
Regarding the governors I agree, I had read up on these when i had my i9100. And currently trying pegasusq speedmod on the s3 to see how that pans out. Cheers though I'll read up on these a little more.
I thought the moderators would of kept the post in check to stop the whole competition scenario.
Was only hoping for an explanation and as I said some facts, thinking it would of been good for the forum and useful for other i9300 owners.
Cheers though
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
d4niven said:
JJEgan said:
I've been reading the kernal posts for a bit now but the definition of tweaks etc seemed a bit vague.
Regarding the governors I agree, I had read up on these when i had my i9100. And currently trying pegasusq speedmod on the s3 to see how that pans out. Cheers though I'll read up on these a little more.
I thought the moderators would of kept the post in check to stop the whole competition scenario.
Was only hoping for an explanation and as I said some facts, thinking it would of been good for the forum and useful for other i9300 owners.
Cheers though
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest if you want stuff explaining then most people would, if willing, go of and link you to threads or copy paste stuff, the best thing is read the last 20 pages of each thread, gives a good idea of performance/stability etc
The moderators simply don't have time to wipe everyone's bums and owing to the over proliferation of adolescent hormones and board room egos here, these threads always go badly wrong!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the users of this forum followed the rules then their would be room for such a kernel thread providing someone is willing to update it daily .
However as users do not follow the rules the forum is a clogged up mess .
Guess how many multiple what kernel posts would still be posted after such as topic was stickied many many as many users prefer to post instead of read sadly .
But as i said PM a dev with your idea .
jje
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
Not being a dev myself. My idea was to have a centralised location, here, where the kernal dev's could state exactly what they had tweaked and possibly what the benefits are.
So many kernals seem to offer the same features, but nothing really gets down to the nity grity.
:thumbup: Slaphead, in hindsight I can totally see where your coming from and why this wouldn't work => end up in a cat fight over why things are good and why they're bad / who's right and who's wrong.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
again, kernEl.
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
Glebun said:
again, kernEl.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..wasted on me. I don't get the kernEl chat...someone care to explain lol
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
it's kernel, not kernal.
Glebun said:
it's kernel, not kernal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
There was me thinking there some running joke going there
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
d4niven said:
Haha
There was me thinking there some running joke going there
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was......your spelling just teasing, for some reason when people misspell kernel like that, it always gets dived on! Don't take it personally
slaphead20 said:
There was......your spelling just teasing, for some reason when people misspell kernel like that, it always gets dived on! Don't take it personally
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair do's.
I can can be rather pedantic at myself at times ...especially if it's a recurring thing
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2