Does this make any sense? Lol
Im running alien, shouldn't it be faster?
Apparently the ATRIX is better than the phone I have (ATRIX) haha. Irony.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
How you said this doesnt make sense... but are you overclocked? Or have a custom rom?
Was getting 6k on CF Bench with Faux's OC v0.19 @ 1.3GHz
vibrantuser said:
How you said this doesnt make sense... but are you overclocked? Or have a custom rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im running alien, as i stated in my post. which makes no sense cause it has tons of tweaks and stock should be slower. no i am not overclocked, i want my battery to last lol
stratax said:
Does this make any sense? Lol
Im running alien, shouldn't it be faster?
Apparently the ATRIX is better than the phone I have (ATRIX) haha. Irony.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is similar to what I got with alien, build 3. For some reason the java score was always low.
I just asked Faux123 that because of a screenshot he had showing low Java scores and I had seen that all the time too. He said that was because of blur.. and as soon as I benched on cm7 then my scores came back inline.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
IMO CF's benchmark app I'd by far the best on the market atm. I laugh every time I see someone using quadrant on a dual core phone...
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
beatphreek said:
I just asked Faux123 that because of a screenshot he had showing low Java scores and I had seen that all the time too. He said that was because of blur.. and as soon as I benched on cm7 then my scores came back inline.
View attachment 702480
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is awesome, i cant believe its higher than the sgs2!
jug6ernaut said:
IMO CF's benchmark app I'd by far the best on the market atm. I laugh every time I see someone using quadrant on a dual core phone...
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol i know right, when people compare two android phones from quadrant and both of them being dual core is just ignorant xD
Related
Why?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
What do you mean? How high are they overclocking the Nexus S?
Lots of Vibrants are oc'ed to 1400 with good stability.
Bionix-v1.2
Dragon kernel v4 Test4
Androdena theme
jRi0T68 said:
What do you mean? How high are they overclocking the Nexus S?
Lots of Vibrants are oc'ed to 1400 with good stability.
Bionix-v1.2
Dragon kernel v4 Test4
Androdena theme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But all nexus s's are good to overclock
Unlike the vibrant I can't oc
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Have you tried Dragon 4? It was MUCH more stable for me.
Bionix-v1.2
Dragon kernel v4 Test4
Androdena theme
Yes The Team Whiskey-/ Dragon and some of the Eugene kernels can over clock very well I had one 1.45 The problem with o.c is the battery drain
But any of those do well in the over clocking world.
Alanrocks15 said:
But all nexus s's are good to overclock
Unlike the vibrant I can't oc
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure its not all the nexus s.. Some phones can handles better than others...ur just unlucky.get another one
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Alanrocks15 said:
Why?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you touch yourself at night.. lmao I'm sorry I couldn't help it 8P
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
theebest said:
Because you touch yourself at night.. lmao I'm sorry I couldn't help it 8P
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha Family Guy
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
It could just mean that the developers of Nexus S put a higher voltage at the higher clock speed, which also means that it kills your phone faster.
You don't gain something from nothing. Oh and I am not talking about battery life....
dragon 3.6 overckolcked to 1.4 has battery almost as good as stock ! DoW doesent because it overclocks gpu at the same time and this is whats jams your phone when u run graphic benchmark.
bartek25 said:
dragon 3.6 overckolcked to 1.4 has battery almost as good as stock ! DoW doesent because it overclocks gpu at the same time and this is whats jams your phone when u run graphic benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ooohhhh so can they not overclock the gpu?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
dragon kernel . get it
bartek25 said:
dragon kernel . get it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have but I can only run up to 1.28 not 1.4 I know I can run. 1.3 because the dow 1.3 old kernel ran flawless
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Alanrocks15 said:
Why?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A newer device with (in all likelihood...this is a guess based on decades of experience with CPU's) a newer revision stepping of the Hummingbird CPU. CPU/GPU manufacturers are ALWAYS fine tuning their designs, primarily for higher yields and better stability. This plays out predictably in the desktop x86 environment with concepts like speed-binning and overclocking in that arena, so it should come as no surprise that this plays out in other areas as well.
Newer board layout with design experience gleaned from manufacturing a few million Galaxy S devices? Reduced capacitance and resistance issues due to layout changes, altering of support components, changing trace lengths...etc, so on and so forth. All of these things can play out for significant and measurable improvements in stability. Manufacturers learn as they "do", the same as we do.
In other words, there are all sorts of easily plausible reasons why.
These sorts of things all have a significant effect in the desktop/laptop system world, so there is no reason to assume they wouldn't carry over to the smartphone universe.
NOTE: If you have issues with WiFi, IT IS NOT DUE TO THE KERNEL, but due to the ROM you are running.
The kernel is now online....sorry, was working on a new server for us, we should have a ROM here soon too.
Features:
Low Power BCM Bluetooth mode
Backported 2.6.38 autogroup
Backported 2.6.38 ck3 patchset
Lagfree governor with fully functioning sysfs
Overclocked to 1.83GHz
Slight under-volting
In-Call recording
Sysfs vdd interface
Properly scales second processor without perflock and using stock mpdecision
Kernel
Z
saved..............
Ziggy's at it again, can't wait till we can test this!
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Already a great start! Just need s-off and ill be happy to give this one a run.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Can't wait for soff. This sounds sweet
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
making me jealous i don't have s-off i even powered off to check again when i saw this post
Ahhhhhhhh....Zigfy no **** brotha LOL....here we go fellas. Were just gettin started. Thanks man. Just made my night
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
how high do you think the vigor can OC to stable??
combatmedic870 said:
how high do you think the vigor can OC to stable??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the most i've seen any msm8660 device overclocked it 1.99 ghz which is what vigor has
JoelZ9614 said:
the most i've seen any msm8660 device overclocked it 1.99 ghz which is what vigor has
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but you guys are awesome! we gotta get 2.0 stable!!!
combatmedic870 said:
but you guys are awesome! we gotta get 2.0 stable!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shouldn't be a problem, I'll start playing some more with it, I'm sure Virus will be happy too, since it's the same processor on the 3D.
Z
ziggy471 said:
Shouldn't be a problem, I'll start playing some more with it, I'm sure Virus will be happy too, since it's the same processor on the 3D.
Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do u got one Zigg? Or are u just Devin for it? Man this a great news!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
ziggy471 said:
Shouldn't be a problem, I'll start playing some more with it, I'm sure Virus will be happy too, since it's the same processor on the 3D.
Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that would be sweet, i read that its only stable to 1.7.....thats what everyone keeps telling me as well. I dont think ive seen a phone yet hit the 2.0 barrier on a dual core!
what are the steps you use on your kernel. I know the stock goes from 1.18 straight to 1.5. did you change that so it atleast has 1.2,1.3 and 1.4? it also goes from 192 straight to 384. do you add a 200 in there at all. I think that would help with power savings. especially when it comes to haves a screen off profile. The phone gets a little laggy when you have it set to just 192mhz for screen off. its better when its 192-384mhz. But having a 290 or something in there would help out im sure and save a little bit of juice due to being able to set it to 192-290 or what not.
just wondering. i thought the stock kernel on the phone was a little odd in them regards. it really likes 1.5 and really hates 192mhz.
Yeah i haven't been able to get the evo 3d s3 to overclock past 1.7 without rebooting.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
fernando sor said:
Yeah i haven't been able to get the evo 3d s3 to overclock past 1.7 without rebooting.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well everyone's device handled the OC differently right? Like I was able to get up to 1.83 with no reboots, where some couldn't get above say 1.7 .....it seems as if some of the devices out there had higher capabilitys than others.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
fernando sor said:
Yeah i haven't been able to get the evo 3d s3 to overclock past 1.7 without rebooting.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
reverepats said:
Well everyone's device handled the OC differently right? Like I was able to get up to 1.83 with no reboots, where some couldn't get above say 1.7 .....it seems as if some of the devices out there had higher capabilitys than others.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It all boils down to voltage, some devices require more voltage than others, some require less. My 3D handles 1.83 all day long, but I had 3D's running at 1.83 LONG before I even had one, remember, I'm on Verizon.
Z
ziggy471 said:
It all boils down to voltage, some devices require more voltage than others, some require less. My 3D handles 1.83 all day long, but I had 3D's running at 1.83 LONG before I even had one, remember, I'm on Verizon.
Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well good to have you on the rezound zigg
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
reverepats said:
Well everyone's device handled the OC differently right? Like I was able to get up to 1.83 with no reboots, where some couldn't get above say 1.7 .....it seems as if some of the devices out there had higher capabilitys than others.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I noticed some stated they could clock to that
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
You would think duel cores would be more overclockable... I can oc my Inc2 to 1.8 all day long and be stable... But I run stock speeds anyways so no biggy, but ill definatly be using zigs kernels in my roms...
Sent from my Htc Rezound using taptalk pro
ziggy471 said:
It all boils down to voltage, some devices require more voltage than others, some require less. My 3D handles 1.83 all day long, but I had 3D's running at 1.83 LONG before I even had one, remember, I'm on Verizon.
Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jeez I didn't even know you were on Verizon the entire time. I thought u were on sprint LOL...ahh well. Pretty stoked about this.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
I'm currently on The Unofficial v1.5 and supposedly it supports overclocking up to 1.9 ghz. Has anyone else using this rom noticed that when you raise the clock speed that high it just reboots constantly? Its supposed to be able to support it, so have I done something wrong?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
I'm currently on The Unofficial v1.5 and supposedly it supports overclocking up to 1.9 ghz. Has anyone else using this rom noticed that when you raise the clock speed that high it just reboots constantly? Its supposed to be able to support it, so have I done something wrong?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most kernels say 1.9 but u should stay at 1.83. 1.9 creates bootloop
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Yes...it does bootloop alot at that speed.. the safest speed is 1.83 or even 1.89 that's plenty of enough speed without any problems...
tmb993 said:
I'm currently on The Unofficial v1.5 and supposedly it supports overclocking up to 1.9 ghz. Has anyone else using this rom noticed that when you raise the clock speed that high it just reboots constantly? Its supposed to be able to support it, so have I done something wrong?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.94 os max speed if u read it says 1.83 stable
sent from team perfections ics rom
The max speed on any device is always unstable. Actually most of the time the top two or three speeds ar always unstable. It also depends on the device too. My Note and your Note may not be stable at the same speed and the rom has nothing to do with it, its the chip in your phone. I remember I had a Touch Pro 2 once that most people could only over clock to 710MHz but a few of us could overclock to 786MHz. I have my Note running pretty stable at 1836 but I have seen some people complaing about bootloops at that speed so it really depends on your device. Remeber when testing out clock speeds make sure that you never check "Apply At Boot" in case the speed is not stable and only check it when you find a stable speed. Her's a video of someone running stable at 1890MHz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4hd5jG1ztc
porkenhimer said:
The max speed on any device is always unstable. Actually most of the time the top two or three speeds ar always unstable. It also depends on the device too. My Note and your Note may not be stable at the same speed and the rom has nothing to do with it, its the chip in your phone. I remember I had a Touch Pro 2 once that most people could only over clock to 710MHz but a few of us could overclock to 786MHz. I have my Note running pretty stable at 1836 but I have seen some people complaing about bootloops at that speed so it really depends on your device. Remeber when testing out clock speeds make sure that you never check "Apply At Boot" in case the speed is not stable and only check it when you find a stable speed. Her's a video of someone running stable at 1890MHz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4hd5jG1ztc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ur right its called a hot reboot
sent from team perfections ics rom
Thanks guys. Been running solid at 1.83 ghz. Min around 702 MHz. Battery lasts almost all day. Anyone found better settings for battery life?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
Thanks guys. Been running solid at 1.83 ghz. Min around 702 MHz. Battery lasts almost all day. Anyone found better settings for battery life?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Leave it at 1.5max and 192min. If you're not doing anything that requires oc'ing, why set it high.
would that cm9 1.5 ?
if so , where are you over clocking from ?
babymatteo said:
Yes. Leave it at 1.5max and 192min. If you're not doing anything that requires oc'ing, why set it high.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It runs sooo much smoother overclocked. But ill try what you said.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
Thanks guys. Been running solid at 1.83 ghz. Min around 702 MHz. Battery lasts almost all day. Anyone found better settings for battery life?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
384 min 1836 max is the best one use lagfree on setcpu
sent from team perfections ics rom
JB calhoun said:
384 min 1836 max is the best one use lagfree on setcpu
sent from team perfections ics rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it true that 384 is the minimum samsungs can run? I used to have my atrix down to 192 and it worked fine (tegra 2)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
erick161 said:
Is it true that 384 is the minimum samsungs can run? I used to have my atrix down to 192 and it worked fine (tegra 2)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it can go down to 192
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Just a tip if you overclock your CPU it will drain the battery life faster keep this in mind.....
The unofficial v1.5 rom came with an OC tool. If I downloaded another one, say SetCPU, will it just override the native tool?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
The unofficial v1.5 rom came with an OC tool. If I downloaded another one, say SetCPU, will it just override the native tool?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know is because i never rooted my device and i know im missing out a ton of features im going to keep stock for a while is because i like how my phone works at the moment.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
animeware said:
I don't know is because i never rooted my device and i know im missing out a ton of features im going to keep stock for a while is because i like how my phone works at the moment.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have no idea and you don't root phones then why are you even here?! Talk about pointless...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Can someone please post their AnTuTu Benchmark score with the HTC DROID DNA? (Stock ROM, not overclocked)
The app was recently updated with new score metrics, but I don't have a DNA here any long to test.
Thanks.
Sent from my Droid DNA
Here's mine.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
20169 (x920e)
Mine was something like 18,500 or around there.
Lol, and Droidforums mentions the DNA commonly scores between 13-14k.
orangechoochoo said:
Lol, and Droidforums mentions the DNA commonly scores between 13-14k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahah that's what I scored when I multitasked everything I could on my DNA. I'm currently 100% stock and I never see anything lower then 18000 unless I really try.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Mine. Stock non-rooted.
Sent from within using Tapatalk 2
I've never seen above 18,700...how are you guys getting 20k?
croppz said:
I've never seen above 18,700...how are you guys getting 20k?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you on a custom Rom or kernel? I'm still on stock but rooted and am not doing anything special (i.e. not killing any apps before running the benchmark). My score is typically between 19,500 - 20,500. 18,700 is fine though, maybe you have an app that is running on the background slowing things down a bit.
jlevy73 said:
Are you on a custom Rom or kernel? I'm still on stock but rooted and am not doing anything special (i.e. not killing any apps before running the benchmark). My score is typically between 19,500 - 20,500. 18,700 is fine though, maybe you have an app that is running on the background slowing things down a bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, phone is stock not rooted either, probably gonna leave it that way too until I get bored and decide to take the jump and unlock my phone.
I have no issue with the scores I got, just was curious. This phone is still fast as hell.
21k consistently. Custom ROM, stock kernel.
Cubed kernel with Digital dream ROM
9602 - yup I am the slow kid on the block
You must be missing the 1 before the 9.
orangechoochoo said:
You must be missing the 1 before the 9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no I am serious., but I got better score in quadrant. I am using digital dream rom
Do see this. I am not alone http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=36790492
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Thanks everyone for replying, I got enough scores to go by.
I changed from cubed kernel to LK Dna kernel, back to 18k+..
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Running everything stock and haven't hit anything below 20k.
Hi Guys, I was wondering which ROM has the highest benchmark scores?
Or maybe some specific ROM with different Kernel or whatever.
Post your scores and give us your opinions
moodloid said:
Hi Guys, I was wondering which ROM has the highest benchmark scores?
Or maybe some specific ROM with different Kernel or whatever.
Post your scores and give us your opinions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might get an avg...but all ROMs run different on each device...not all boards are equal..
Gil81 said:
You might get an avg...but all ROMs run different on each device...not all boards are equal..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
P4
moodloid said:
P4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I can't even chime in....p4 WiFi....but if you're want to know what I get the best scores with..its 4.2 ROMs...Even though, the 4.3 ROM I'm running now is much faster feeling... I think it has to do with the write spread to sdcard . It test goofy ...and if I'm honest. Its a little slower installing on 4.3. But the ROM itself is much faster.
Benchmarks don't mean anything. If the ROM feels good, then its good.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
eushaun99 said:
Benchmarks don't mean anything. If the ROM feels good, then its good.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My actual experience of any ROM is the benchmark score that I appreciate! For me, 4.3 leaves 4.x.2 way behind in the shade. It does not matter to me what score any benchmark app churns out!
Cheers.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda app-developers app
John Kester said:
My actual experience of any ROM is the benchmark score that I appreciate! For me, 4.3 leaves 4.x.2 way behind in the shade. It does not matter to me what score any benchmark app churns out!
Cheers.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your words confuse me.
First, you said that benchmark scores matter right? Then you said benchmarks doesn't matter? Sorry, my Malaysian English sucks.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
eushaun99 said:
Your words confuse me.
First, you said that benchmark scores matter right? Then you said benchmarks doesn't matter? Sorry, my Malaysian English sucks.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simply put: my benchmark score is my experience of the ROM. If the ROM is fast, smooth and stable like the 4.3 ROMs I have experienced, then I score the ROM high For me it does not matter if an app scores the ROM low. I have therefore scored 4.3 very high. Whether an app scores 4.3 low or not means nothing to me. I DO THE BENCHMARK SCORING FOR MYSELF. Compared to 4.x.2, my benchmark for 4.3 is definitely higher. I am sure you get my drift now.
Cheers.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda app-developers app
John Kester said:
Simply put: my benchmark score is my experience of the ROM. If the ROM is fast, smooth and stable like the 4.3 ROMs I have experienced, then I score the ROM high For me it does not matter if an app scores the ROM low. I have therefore scored 4.3 very high. Whether an app scores 4.3 low or not means nothing to me. I DO THE BENCHMARK SCORING FOR MYSELF. Compared to 4.x.2, my benchmark for 4.3 is definitely higher. I am sure you get my drift now.
Cheers.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I get it now. So basically you have a benchmark software in your head.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
eushaun99 said:
Oh I get it now. So basically you have a benchmark software in your head.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You bet I have!
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda app-developers app
eushaun99 said:
Benchmarks don't mean anything. If the ROM feels good, then its good.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1