{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
9100 indicated ram as 837mb，meanwhile 9100G indicated as much as 910mb.
9100G is more faster cos more RAM?
I have 0.91 GB on my 9100
hmm i have 837 mb ram
Got 839mb RAM..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
prodygee said:
I have 0.91 GB on my 9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how to get that? mine 832MB only
I want to buy Samsung Galaxy S2 for christmas three. but i want version with 0.91GB=910MB.. How can i see this?
BlackRainX said:
I want to buy Samsung Galaxy S2 for christmas three. but i want version with 0.91GB=910MB.. How can i see this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's hardly a reasons to buy a phone.
Most likely the I9100G system, hardware or built in software uses less resources or other hardware differ from the I9100. Samsung advertises 1GB ram on these phones, but we know the graphics card uses up memory and the system uses up some too, hence 835mb total usable RAM on mine.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
@ Molitro.. -> If you have a problem with it.. Keep it for you please
@ nicholaschum -> Would like to know why I9100G use less resources -> More Total RAM avaible
Processor and Video Cards are different, Samsung Galaxy S II GT-I9100 is using Samsung own Exynos 4210 SoC CPU and ARM Mali-400 GPU. And GT-I9100G uses Texas Instruments OMAP4430 CPU and PowerVR SGX540 GPU.
This is what I got from Jayce Ooi's website:
Summary
I9100G
Doesn't overheat easily, better battery life.
CPU seems to be capped at 1008 MHz.
Poorer 3D performance.
Can't download apps / games developed for Samsung Galaxy S II I9100 in Samsung Apps / Android Market.
Fonts in PAPAGO! very small.
Not much custom firmware / modification
I9100
Overheat easily, poor battery life on Android 2.3.3. Android 2.3.5 fixed it.
Fully use 1.2 GHz CPU.
Better 3D performance.
Anti-Aliasing (4xAA and 16xAA) support with Chainfire3D Pro .
Lot of custom firmware, kernel, modification, tweaks, etc.
Seems like its the stronger GPU in the I9100 that's eating up the RAM that you're noticing on the photos above.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
nicholaschum said:
Processor and Video Cards are different, Samsung Galaxy S II GT-I9100 is using Samsung own Exynos 4210 SoC CPU and ARM Mali-400 GPU. And GT-I9100G uses Texas Instruments OMAP4430 CPU and PowerVR SGX540 GPU.
This is what I got from Jayce Ooi's website:
Summary
I9100G
Doesn't overheat easily, better battery life.
CPU seems to be capped at 1008 MHz.
Poorer 3D performance.
Can't download apps / games developed for Samsung Galaxy S II I9100 in Samsung Apps / Android Market.
Fonts in PAPAGO! very small.
Not much custom firmware / modification
I9100
Overheat easily, poor battery life on Android 2.3.3. Android 2.3.5 fixed it.
Fully use 1.2 GHz CPU.
Better 3D performance.
Anti-Aliasing (4xAA and 16xAA) support with Chainfire3D Pro .
Lot of custom firmware, kernel, modification, tweaks, etc.
Seems like its the stronger GPU in the I9100 that's eating up the RAM that you're noticing on the photos above.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe there is a direct correlation with what is in bold....
try look at this forum..this one is for G version..=)
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2068824
Related
Look here.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The cpu for the nexus one is insane. I don't care about I/O or anything else but cpu. Is there any way a vibrant (or any other galaxy phone) to match the nexus one in cpu speed? Is it possible without overclocking? If so then how can it be done?
Contrary to quadrant scores (Which aren't everything btw) the 1GHz Galaxy S Hummingbird is a much better processor than the first gen 1GHz Snapdragon that's in the Nexus One. Android 2.2 and the subsequent JIT compiler in it were coded specifically for the Snapdragon, therefore that processor runs the best in 2.2. Now the newest Nexus phone, the Nexus S, has Android 2.3, and Gingerbread and is coded similarly for the Hummingbird. Basically, the Hummingbird is the superior processor, and that is demonstrated in 2.3.
mdof1337 said:
Contrary to quadrant scores (Which aren't everything btw) the 1GHz Galaxy S Hummingbird is a much better processor than the first gen 1GHz Snapdragon that's in the Nexus One. Android 2.2 and the subsequent JIT compiler in it were coded specifically for the Snapdragon, therefore that processor runs the best in 2.2. Now the newest Nexus phone, the Nexus S, has Android 2.3, and Gingerbread and is coded similarly for the Hummingbird. Basically, the Hummingbird is the superior processor, and that is demonstrated in 2.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ he speaks the truth.
Amen
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
mdof1337 said:
Contrary to quadrant scores (Which aren't everything btw) the 1GHz Galaxy S Hummingbird is a much better processor than the first gen 1GHz Snapdragon that's in the Nexus One. Android 2.2 and the subsequent JIT compiler in it were coded specifically for the Snapdragon, therefore that processor runs the best in 2.2. Now the newest Nexus phone, the Nexus S, has Android 2.3, and Gingerbread and is coded similarly for the Hummingbird. Basically, the Hummingbird is the superior processor, and that is demonstrated in 2.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like JIT can still use some improvement. 2.3 running on nexus one is still 40+ mflops in linpack vs 15 on nexus s.
Sent from my Nero powered Vibrant
mdof1337 said:
Contrary to quadrant scores (Which aren't everything btw) the 1GHz Galaxy S Hummingbird is a much better processor than the first gen 1GHz Snapdragon that's in the Nexus One. Android 2.2 and the subsequent JIT compiler in it were coded specifically for the Snapdragon, therefore that processor runs the best in 2.2. Now the newest Nexus phone, the Nexus S, has Android 2.3, and Gingerbread and is coded similarly for the Hummingbird. Basically, the Hummingbird is the superior processor, and that is demonstrated in 2.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the quandrant scores are false?
So what about the 2.2 custom roms we have for the vibrant? Do they have a JIT compiler as well? Why don't they give the vibrant anywhere close to the Nexus one's (which has an inferior processor) cpu speed?
One sure test for the Nexus one is for someone to download and install Droidfish chess program from the market (it's free) and hit analyze. On the vibrant Droidfish reachs 100,000 nps after 50 seconds. I'm curious to what the Nexus one will reach here.
h1a8 said:
So the quandrant scores are false?
So what about the 2.2 custom roms we have for the vibrant? Do they have a JIT compiler as well? Why don't they give the vibrant anywhere close to the Nexus one's (which has an inferior processor) cpu speed?
One sure test for the Nexus one is for someone to download and install Droidfish chess program from the market (it's free) and hit analyze. On the vibrant Droidfish reachs 100,000 nps after 50 seconds. I'm curious to what the Nexus one will reach here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Concerning your statement in bold, you will get different answers depending on who you ask. Some people do not believe in Quadrant or any benchmarking, others think they are very accurate and representative of real world results.
I personally believe Quadrant is an excellent benchmarking tool, it is accurate, and representative of real world results. That is just my opinion, and someone else for sure will disagree.
lqaddict said:
It looks like JIT can still use some improvement. 2.3 running on nexus one is still 40+ mflops in linpack vs 15 on nexus s.
Sent from my Nero powered Vibrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not anymore. New linpacks will max at. 15. Just update and test. You'll see.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Despite both having the same GPU, I have heard that the SGS3 version will be better some how? Higher clock speed?
Can anyone shed some light on this?
otester said:
Despite both having the same GPU, I have heard that the SGS3 version will be better some how? Higher clock speed?
Can anyone shed some light on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also have more cores i believe.
FISKER_Q said:
Also have more cores i believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to this they both have 4 cores.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exynos
otester said:
According to this they both have 4 cores.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exynos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, could've sworn there was a discussion about it having more cores when it was announced, my bad then.
As far as I know the GPU will have higher clock frequency. Also both S2 and S3 have the Quad-Core Mali-400MP.
Faryaab said:
As far as I know the GPU will have higher clock frequency. Also both S2 and S3 have the Quad-Core Mali-400MP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will largely be the decider on whether I get it or not.
(As I am designing a GPU intensive 3D game).
otester said:
This will largely be the decider on whether I get it or not.
(As I am designing a GPU intensive 3D game).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, S2 had the fastest Mobile GPU and now S3 has the fastest one. So if you really want the best GPU go for the S3 but S2 will also work really well.
Faryaab said:
Well, S2 had the fastest Mobile GPU and now S3 has the fastest one. So if you really want the best GPU go for the S3 but S2 will also work really well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I need some proof though, no one seems to really know for sure, just want to be sure before splashing £500
This seems to explain it:
the main thing is the smaller process node design, the increased memory bandwidth, cleverer memory bandwidth architecture
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung announced that they have switched to high-k materials and metal gates (HKMG) and further claimed it can provide superior performance with less power than conventional poly-Si/SiON used at 45nm. Samsung demonstrated that Exynos 4212 (32nm version) SoC can produce 35% to 50% more horsepower than the older Exynos 4210 (45nm version). So clearly Exynos 4412 quad core wins the “CPU Horsepower” battle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While they haven’t officially announced this yet, I believe the GPU is the same one they promised for the dual core 1.5 Ghz Exynos 4212 chip. They said that GPU had a 50% increase in performance over the current one in the Galaxy S2. This improvement is most likely possible because of the jump from 45nm for the dual core Exynos to the 32nm Exynos 4412 (they used the more efficient transistors to increase performance at the same or lower power consumption).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source
I had the Note which was dualcore Exynos 1.4ghz and same GPU, but 1280x800, it could handle just about all the games thrown at it, ie. RipTide, Asphalt 6. I only felt Mordern Combat 3 could have higher fps, although very smooth and playable.
eksasol said:
I had the Note which was dualcore Exynos 1.4ghz and same GPU, but 1280x800, it could handle just about all the games thrown at it, ie. RipTide, Asphalt 6. I only felt Mordern Combat 3 could have higher fps, although very smooth and playable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the game I'm working on, just tried it on my phone today (haven't tested in a few months) and I have noticed some lagging with the new faster animations.
otester said:
With the game I'm working on, just tried it on my phone today (haven't tested in a few months) and I have noticed some lagging with the new faster animations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is that if you are hardly able to run the game on a Mali-400MP then the game would lag like hell even on T2/T3.
Faryaab said:
The thing is that if you are hardly able to run the game on a Mali-400MP then the game would lag like hell even on T2/T3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
T2/T3?
Also I wouldn't say it hardly runs, minimum of 20FPS, lots of optimizations to be done though such as LOD (basically chops poly count down on far away models).
For lower devices...
Dynamic lighting turned off.
Light maps could be baked into the texture
Normal maps removed.
Specular maps removed.
At the moment it's probably the same or exceeds the quality of Shadowgun THD.
Check available benchmarks .)
You should have looked around more for available benchmarks.
This show clarly that the s3 is much faster than the s2:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
source and source
Hironimo said:
You should have looked around more for available benchmarks.
This show clarly that the s3 is much faster than the s2:
source and source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to know the technical reason, I've already looked at the benchmarks.
otester said:
I wanted to know the technical reason, I've already looked at the benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher clock, optimised drivers, maybe hardware optimisation
Mopral said:
Higher clock, optimised drivers, maybe hardware optimisation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People at the HTC sensation forum extracted Adreno 225 Drivers and used it on their Adreno 220 powered phones and they gained a huge performance boost!
as we know Adreno 225 is Adreno 220 with double the frequency (thanks to that new manufacturing process of the CPU also the GPU still using the same process...)
so can't someone extract the new drivers so everyone with Mali 400 GPU can use it?
Because S3's Quad-core GPU frequency is 400MHz. S2 only 275MHz.I am a Chinese grade 9 student andlooking forward to GS III.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
sorry for my bad English. the frequency isthereason that some tablets with realtek rk2918 board(mali400 mp2)'s 3d performance is higher than GS II.because mali400 on rk2918 is400MHz but GS2 only 275MHz.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
Just wonder whether clocking up the GPU might pose heating issues.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Hi guys. I have a question for you. I have a Samsung Galaxy S3 on the USCellular and from what i understand the US version came with 2gb of RAM.
When i run benchmarks on the phone with Quadrant Standard or AnTuTu Benchmark and when i go to the info part of the apps. This is what you get.
Total RAM: 1623MB available 419mb <------- Antutu benchmark
Total Memory 1662224kb Free 501520kb Inactive: 136464kb <---------- Quadrant Standard
I was wondering if you could maybe run the same app and find out your details if you have the US version .
I though that the number would be higher . I would love to see what number you get.
Thank you
Well international has 1 GB of ram here is the pic, 780 MB usable , and we have 1.6 GB usable i would not complain.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
jkr500 said:
Hi guys. I have a question for you. I have a Samsung Galaxy S3 on the USCellular and from what i understand the US version came with 2gb of RAM.
When i run benchmarks on the phone with Quadrant Standard or AnTuTu Benchmark and when i go to the info part of the apps. This is what you get.
Total RAM: 1623MB available 419mb <------- Antutu benchmark
Total Memory 1662224kb Free 501520kb Inactive: 136464kb <---------- Quadrant Standard
I was wondering if you could maybe run the same app and find out your details if you have the US version .
I though that the number would be higher . I would love to see what number you get.
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Several 100 mb are dedicated to video memory. Should be 1.62gb left over after video memory is taken
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
thank you guys. i thought that it would show up as 2048 total memory. i wanted to make sure my phone was all good. thank you
jkr500 said:
Hi guys. I have a question for you. I have a Samsung Galaxy S3 on the USCellular and from what i understand the US version came with 2gb of RAM.
When i run benchmarks on the phone with Quadrant Standard or AnTuTu Benchmark and when i go to the info part of the apps. This is what you get.
Total RAM: 1623MB available 419mb <------- Antutu benchmark
Total Memory 1662224kb Free 501520kb Inactive: 136464kb <---------- Quadrant Standard
I was wondering if you could maybe run the same app and find out your details if you have the US version .
I though that the number would be higher . I would love to see what number you get.
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you found a working root method for your us cellular version? I'm curious if any of the existing development will be compatible with the us cell version.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
So far i haven't attempted any root method yet since we don't even have a UScellular section. lol
I might try the version that is for mac and that works for all the major networks.
jkr500 said:
Hi guys. I have a question for you. I have a Samsung Galaxy S3 on the USCellular and from what i understand the US version came with 2gb of RAM.
When i run benchmarks on the phone with Quadrant Standard or AnTuTu Benchmark and when i go to the info part of the apps. This is what you get.
Total RAM: 1623MB available 419mb <------- Antutu benchmark
Total Memory 1662224kb Free 501520kb Inactive: 136464kb <---------- Quadrant Standard
I was wondering if you could maybe run the same app and find out your details if you have the US version .
I though that the number would be higher . I would love to see what number you get.
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on Quad i have total memory 1662224 kb free 101616 inactive 260556. I wonder why so much is inactive, maybe cuz i had power saver on? just turned it off and reran, now it shows... total 1662224 free 98292 inactive 261400. So i turn power saver off, and have more ram inactive????
Hey all
Although this device has been out for a few months, I thought I'd still open up a general specifications and design discussion thread. I can see why people needing dual sim support have opted for the Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime, but what do members think of the display with a low ppi and small memory capacity?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Specifications:
Display - TFT, 5.0 inches, 540 x 960 pixels (~220 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410
CPU - Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU - Adreno 306
RAM - 1 GB
Memory - 8 GB
Camera - 8 MP, 3264 x 2448 pixels, autofocus, LED flash
Secondary Camera - 5 MP
Sensors - Accelerometer, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot, Bluetooth v4.0
Battery - 2600 mAh
Dimensions - 144.8 x 72.1 x 8.6 mm
Weight - 156 g
Color Availability - White, Gray, Gold
Source: gsmarena
I'm really confused why in my Galaxy Grand Prime Total RAM that I check using CPU-Z is 884 MB, but in the promotional box or official spesification (like above) it's says that Galaxy Grand Prime has 1 GB RAM? :banghead:
Sent from my SM-G530H using XDA Free mobile app
Rizqan7 said:
I'm really confused why in my Galaxy Grand Prime Total RAM that I check using CPU-Z is 884 MB, but in the promotional box or official spesification (like above) it's says that Galaxy Grand Prime has 1 GB RAM? :banghead:
Sent from my SM-G530H using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The "Lost" memory is allocated to the GPU.
ForumNinja said:
The "Lost" memory is allocated to the GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks a lot, now I understand
Sent from my SM-G530H using XDA Free mobile app
Battery is 2100 Mah CPU-Z source
nice camera quality...very smooth to use...but one thing...samsung should give inbuild office+pdf app also...bcz now a days its very neccesary
does it support 4G? it says LTE so it should, but when I called my sim card network provider , they told me my phone does not support 4g!!
---------- Post added at 08:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 PM ----------
Flamestorm said:
Battery is 2100 Mah CPU-Z source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah same here, I was in shock when I saw it
The 4g depends on the model, there's some lte, some dual sim
Send from Tapatalk
In one week i have SM-G530FZ i can say I am happy with it
only i dont like no support for dlna on video.apk i must install a 3rd party soft like allsare or another video player to see video on my old smart tv
i hope in next update the fix this or any custom rom make it posible
The cricket variant has 1.5 gb of ram.
In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.
Sandi1987 said:
In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CPU and Memory benchmarks depend on the ROM, the number of Apps you've installed, and a lot more factors. Also, this phone is 4.5 years old now, so what more do you expect out of it? Your phone is not dead. Go ahead and try out some custom ROMs, Kernels and MODs for your i9100.
Sandi1987 said:
In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score? Anything above 12000 should be considered alright. I personally get around 15000 on antutu. Perhaps look more at the specs of the cpu and etc to confirm if product is gunuine or not.
gsstudios said:
What's your antutu score? Anything above 12000 should be considered alright. I personally get around 15000 on antutu. Perhaps look more at the specs of the cpu and etc to confirm if product is gunuine or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
12735 (Version 5.1). I tried PassMark PerformanceTest and Quadrant Standard Edition and i got lower Results on the same ROM. Something is wrong with CPU and Memory.
EDIT:
I got Score 13451 in version 5.7, but CPU and Memory Score are too bad.
@Sandi1987
Put your phone in a fridge for 1 hour . Clear recent apps menu and ram and run the test again. Tell us results.
And i'm not joking about 1 hour in fridge.
Wysłane ze Slim-fonika 9.0 powered by Apolo 7.3
In SuperPI i got normal Results (1M) and Games works normally.
Sandi1987 said:
12735 (Version 5.1). I tried PassMark PerformanceTest and Quadrant Standard Edition and i got lower Results on the same ROM. Something is wrong with CPU and Memory.
EDIT:
I got Score 13451 in version 5.7, but CPU and Memory Score are too bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU and memory scores affected by version of android (as well as runtime and etc). Usually stock won't give the best performance, but custom roms usually have more performance. Installing a custom kernel can also boost performance too.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Same Android and AnTuTu version.
I have:
RAM: 970
CPU Integer: 1205
CPU Float-Point: 205
CPU Float-Point Score is so bad.
Why i have lower Scores then on Alcatel Pop C3 with 1300 MHz Dual Core in Benchmarking Software, but Games works normally like always? Android System works fast.
My CPU works only at Max. 800 MHz, not 1200 MHz. This is the reason why i get lower Scores. I Overclock CPU from 1200 MHz to 1400 MHz and it's works only at 800 MHz.
EDIT:
I found the problem. I have Enabled Energy Saver.