Hi guys. I have a question for you. I have a Samsung Galaxy S3 on the USCellular and from what i understand the US version came with 2gb of RAM.
When i run benchmarks on the phone with Quadrant Standard or AnTuTu Benchmark and when i go to the info part of the apps. This is what you get.
Total RAM: 1623MB available 419mb <------- Antutu benchmark
Total Memory 1662224kb Free 501520kb Inactive: 136464kb <---------- Quadrant Standard
I was wondering if you could maybe run the same app and find out your details if you have the US version .
I though that the number would be higher . I would love to see what number you get.
Thank you
Well international has 1 GB of ram here is the pic, 780 MB usable , and we have 1.6 GB usable i would not complain.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
jkr500 said:
Hi guys. I have a question for you. I have a Samsung Galaxy S3 on the USCellular and from what i understand the US version came with 2gb of RAM.
When i run benchmarks on the phone with Quadrant Standard or AnTuTu Benchmark and when i go to the info part of the apps. This is what you get.
Total RAM: 1623MB available 419mb <------- Antutu benchmark
Total Memory 1662224kb Free 501520kb Inactive: 136464kb <---------- Quadrant Standard
I was wondering if you could maybe run the same app and find out your details if you have the US version .
I though that the number would be higher . I would love to see what number you get.
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Several 100 mb are dedicated to video memory. Should be 1.62gb left over after video memory is taken
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
thank you guys. i thought that it would show up as 2048 total memory. i wanted to make sure my phone was all good. thank you
jkr500 said:
Hi guys. I have a question for you. I have a Samsung Galaxy S3 on the USCellular and from what i understand the US version came with 2gb of RAM.
When i run benchmarks on the phone with Quadrant Standard or AnTuTu Benchmark and when i go to the info part of the apps. This is what you get.
Total RAM: 1623MB available 419mb <------- Antutu benchmark
Total Memory 1662224kb Free 501520kb Inactive: 136464kb <---------- Quadrant Standard
I was wondering if you could maybe run the same app and find out your details if you have the US version .
I though that the number would be higher . I would love to see what number you get.
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you found a working root method for your us cellular version? I'm curious if any of the existing development will be compatible with the us cell version.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
So far i haven't attempted any root method yet since we don't even have a UScellular section. lol
I might try the version that is for mac and that works for all the major networks.
jkr500 said:
Hi guys. I have a question for you. I have a Samsung Galaxy S3 on the USCellular and from what i understand the US version came with 2gb of RAM.
When i run benchmarks on the phone with Quadrant Standard or AnTuTu Benchmark and when i go to the info part of the apps. This is what you get.
Total RAM: 1623MB available 419mb <------- Antutu benchmark
Total Memory 1662224kb Free 501520kb Inactive: 136464kb <---------- Quadrant Standard
I was wondering if you could maybe run the same app and find out your details if you have the US version .
I though that the number would be higher . I would love to see what number you get.
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on Quad i have total memory 1662224 kb free 101616 inactive 260556. I wonder why so much is inactive, maybe cuz i had power saver on? just turned it off and reran, now it shows... total 1662224 free 98292 inactive 261400. So i turn power saver off, and have more ram inactive????
Related
Supposedly it should have dual channel 32-bit 800Mbps (the same as OMAP4). But apparently utilizing full memory bandwidth might be a bit challenging with ARM Cortex-A9 (at least early revisions). One example is OMAP4: groups.google.com/group/pandaboard/msg/bd03264b6b800900 And another example is here: anandtech.com/show/4225/the-ipad-2-review/4 (just look at the "Stdlib Write" vs. "Stdlib Copy" numbers, somehow "Stdlib Copy" is unexpectedly low for newer iPad 2).
So could anybody from early adopters benchmark memory bandwidth in Exynos based Galaxy S2? It would be very interesting to see the results for memcpy/memset ("Stdlib Copy"/"Stdlib Write"). There are some benchmark applications in Android Market, and one of them which is called "Benchmark" (softweg) seems to be able to provide "Copy memory" statistics.
I'm going to make a decision whether to buy this phone based on this information
Thanks.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
What did the ipad get?
ice_coffee said:
What did the ipad get?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's difficult to compare results of different tests even if they attempt to measure the same thing. But the whole point is that "Stdlib Copy (single-threaded scalar)" benchmark regressed from 740.6 MB/s to 522.0 MB/s in iPad2 when compared to the original iPad according to the data from Anand's article that I linked.
According to the data provided by Intratech (thanks a lot!) Galaxy S2 shows throughput ~700MB/s for memory copy performance in this particular 'Benchmark' program from the Android Market. And on my Galaxy Tab (Hummingbird, Cortex-A8) the same test program shows ~560MB/s. Looks like Exynos is at least somewhat better than Hummingbird, which is very encouraging, considering the troubles encountered by the other vendors. Here is one more link for OMAP4 - computerarch.com/log/2011/03/01/pandaboard/
And this particular benchmark program is not a perfect one. On Galaxy Tab, I can get better memory bandwidth for memory copy by using NEON instructions and boost it to something like ~670MB/s (up from ~560MB/s shown by the benchmark). Which additionally shows that the results from different tests may vary a bit and it's better to run the same test program when comparing different hardware. Also memory latency for random memory accesses is quite important and I don't know any existing test in Android Marked which could benchmark it, but I hope that Samsung also managed this right
With all that said, such low level benchmarks cover only a single aspect of system performance. And good memory bandwidth is important only for certain types of applications. I was just curious whether Exynos could possibly have any memory bandwidth issues or not.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
9100 indicated ram as 837mb，meanwhile 9100G indicated as much as 910mb.
9100G is more faster cos more RAM?
I have 0.91 GB on my 9100
hmm i have 837 mb ram
Got 839mb RAM..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
prodygee said:
I have 0.91 GB on my 9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how to get that? mine 832MB only
I want to buy Samsung Galaxy S2 for christmas three. but i want version with 0.91GB=910MB.. How can i see this?
BlackRainX said:
I want to buy Samsung Galaxy S2 for christmas three. but i want version with 0.91GB=910MB.. How can i see this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's hardly a reasons to buy a phone.
Most likely the I9100G system, hardware or built in software uses less resources or other hardware differ from the I9100. Samsung advertises 1GB ram on these phones, but we know the graphics card uses up memory and the system uses up some too, hence 835mb total usable RAM on mine.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
@ Molitro.. -> If you have a problem with it.. Keep it for you please
@ nicholaschum -> Would like to know why I9100G use less resources -> More Total RAM avaible
Processor and Video Cards are different, Samsung Galaxy S II GT-I9100 is using Samsung own Exynos 4210 SoC CPU and ARM Mali-400 GPU. And GT-I9100G uses Texas Instruments OMAP4430 CPU and PowerVR SGX540 GPU.
This is what I got from Jayce Ooi's website:
Summary
I9100G
Doesn't overheat easily, better battery life.
CPU seems to be capped at 1008 MHz.
Poorer 3D performance.
Can't download apps / games developed for Samsung Galaxy S II I9100 in Samsung Apps / Android Market.
Fonts in PAPAGO! very small.
Not much custom firmware / modification
I9100
Overheat easily, poor battery life on Android 2.3.3. Android 2.3.5 fixed it.
Fully use 1.2 GHz CPU.
Better 3D performance.
Anti-Aliasing (4xAA and 16xAA) support with Chainfire3D Pro .
Lot of custom firmware, kernel, modification, tweaks, etc.
Seems like its the stronger GPU in the I9100 that's eating up the RAM that you're noticing on the photos above.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
nicholaschum said:
Processor and Video Cards are different, Samsung Galaxy S II GT-I9100 is using Samsung own Exynos 4210 SoC CPU and ARM Mali-400 GPU. And GT-I9100G uses Texas Instruments OMAP4430 CPU and PowerVR SGX540 GPU.
This is what I got from Jayce Ooi's website:
Summary
I9100G
Doesn't overheat easily, better battery life.
CPU seems to be capped at 1008 MHz.
Poorer 3D performance.
Can't download apps / games developed for Samsung Galaxy S II I9100 in Samsung Apps / Android Market.
Fonts in PAPAGO! very small.
Not much custom firmware / modification
I9100
Overheat easily, poor battery life on Android 2.3.3. Android 2.3.5 fixed it.
Fully use 1.2 GHz CPU.
Better 3D performance.
Anti-Aliasing (4xAA and 16xAA) support with Chainfire3D Pro .
Lot of custom firmware, kernel, modification, tweaks, etc.
Seems like its the stronger GPU in the I9100 that's eating up the RAM that you're noticing on the photos above.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe there is a direct correlation with what is in bold....
try look at this forum..this one is for G version..=)
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2068824
I am currently running the latest stable cm7 (Ba2tF), I found a program (quadrant) that gives me statistics about my phone.
What concerns me is it says I have 1 core. Is this the phone not utilizing resources? If so, is there a known method to force it to use it? Or is it possible the app doesn't register the second core for some reason?
Or is this something I messed up by being a relative n00b??
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
jeranon said:
I am currently running the latest stable cm7 (Ba2tF), I found a program (quadrant) that gives me statistics about my phone.
What concerns me is it says I have 1 core. Is this the phone not utilizing resources? If so, is there a known method to force it to use it? Or is it possible the app doesn't register the second core for some reason?
Or is this something I messed up by being a relative n00b??View attachment 772122
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant does not work well with dual core devices. use apps like cf-bench or antutu
Cheers! I'll check them out.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Okay, let me make this clear, because it's not written in any FAQs I've seen, and it took me a while to work out: Android (at least on Tegra 2 devices) DISABLES CPU cores when they are not needed. Garbarge collection has been moved exclusively to core 0 so that core 1 can remain idle for extended periods and be disabled when not needed. Owing to the fact that looking up system information is not a particularly strenuous, multi-threaded task you will almost NEVER see the second core listed unless you've only just come from another task which was using loads of power and it hasn't yet got round to 'un-latching' the second core.
Look in your system log, you'll see it's full of messages about Core 1 being attatched/detatched.
My only issue is not understanding this behaviour but why the decision to implement it was made. I'm fairly certain it must have overheads and I'm also pretty sure NVidia stated that the CPU cores in Tegra 2 are not individually power gated - i.e. there should be no power saving benefit to doing this...?
Azurael said:
Okay, let me make this clear, because it's not written in any FAQs I've seen, and it took me a while to work out: Android (at least on Tegra 2 devices) DISABLES CPU cores when they are not needed. Garbarge collection has been moved exclusively to core 0 so that core 1 can remain idle for extended periods and be disabled when not needed. Owing to the fact that looking up system information is not a particularly strenuous, multi-threaded task you will almost NEVER see the second core listed unless you've only just come from another task which was using loads of power and it hasn't yet got round to 'un-latching' the second core.
Look in your system log, you'll see it's full of messages about Core 1 being attatched/detatched.
My only issue is not understanding this behaviour but why the decision to implement it was made. I'm fairly certain it must have overheads and I'm also pretty sure NVidia stated that the CPU cores in Tegra 2 are not individually power gated - i.e. there should be no power saving benefit to doing this...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I reckon not having a second core running at 300-800mhz just to use the calculator/calendar would massively outweigh the "overheads" involved in enabling/disabling the 2nd core. I'm not sure about the individual power gates though
In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.
Sandi1987 said:
In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CPU and Memory benchmarks depend on the ROM, the number of Apps you've installed, and a lot more factors. Also, this phone is 4.5 years old now, so what more do you expect out of it? Your phone is not dead. Go ahead and try out some custom ROMs, Kernels and MODs for your i9100.
Sandi1987 said:
In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score? Anything above 12000 should be considered alright. I personally get around 15000 on antutu. Perhaps look more at the specs of the cpu and etc to confirm if product is gunuine or not.
gsstudios said:
What's your antutu score? Anything above 12000 should be considered alright. I personally get around 15000 on antutu. Perhaps look more at the specs of the cpu and etc to confirm if product is gunuine or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
12735 (Version 5.1). I tried PassMark PerformanceTest and Quadrant Standard Edition and i got lower Results on the same ROM. Something is wrong with CPU and Memory.
EDIT:
I got Score 13451 in version 5.7, but CPU and Memory Score are too bad.
@Sandi1987
Put your phone in a fridge for 1 hour . Clear recent apps menu and ram and run the test again. Tell us results.
And i'm not joking about 1 hour in fridge.
Wysłane ze Slim-fonika 9.0 powered by Apolo 7.3
In SuperPI i got normal Results (1M) and Games works normally.
Sandi1987 said:
12735 (Version 5.1). I tried PassMark PerformanceTest and Quadrant Standard Edition and i got lower Results on the same ROM. Something is wrong with CPU and Memory.
EDIT:
I got Score 13451 in version 5.7, but CPU and Memory Score are too bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU and memory scores affected by version of android (as well as runtime and etc). Usually stock won't give the best performance, but custom roms usually have more performance. Installing a custom kernel can also boost performance too.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Same Android and AnTuTu version.
I have:
RAM: 970
CPU Integer: 1205
CPU Float-Point: 205
CPU Float-Point Score is so bad.
Why i have lower Scores then on Alcatel Pop C3 with 1300 MHz Dual Core in Benchmarking Software, but Games works normally like always? Android System works fast.
My CPU works only at Max. 800 MHz, not 1200 MHz. This is the reason why i get lower Scores. I Overclock CPU from 1200 MHz to 1400 MHz and it's works only at 800 MHz.
EDIT:
I found the problem. I have Enabled Energy Saver.
In the specs it says: CPU runs with 1.5 GHz. But my phone runs with 1.3 GHz... :crying:
Bug? Wrong specs? What is your CPU running at? 1.3 or 1.5 GHz
Besides: The phone is fast as lightning. Just want to know
From what I heard it's real MT6753 1.5 GHz but downclock at 1.3 GHz due to battery power. If this is true, I can say very, very stupid reason.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
xdazilla said:
In the specs it says: CPU runs with 1.5 GHz. But my phone runs with 1.3 GHz... :crying:
Bug? Wrong specs? What is your CPU running at? 1.3 or 1.5 GHz
Besides: The phone is fast as lightning. Just want to know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, 1.3 is the specs I have seen and that is the same as the phone I have.
frankly I don't need any more speed at the moment... as this phone poops on phones for similar money available over here in the UK.
You could get the ZP999 for even more 'Zopo speed' but then you'd have an older OS, and a non removable battery... and lots of people complaining about having the battery run flat in a few hours... I think the Speed seven is the one to have!
Real specs..
Enviado do meu ZP951 através de Tapatalk
Netmatrix said:
Real specs..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This still doesn't add up... Droid Info app shows there are 8 processor cores, and I can see it is possible to use all 8... but MT6735 only has 4 cores. How do you explain this? Does the phone have two MT6735 chips?
Someone from ZOPO should explain this.... it's an 8 core or a 4 core phone really?
If you look at the screenshot, it mentions first MT6753 and the reports the CPU as MT6735. So there is certainly something wrong and we can not trust it.
Just check the phone with AnTuTu a Geekbench and compare the results with other MT6753 phones. That would make it clear.
Enviado do meu ZP951 através de Tapatalk
In my Zopo Speed 7 plus
For the moment I can not send image (rule of the first 10 messages).
But mè cpu-z sees as 1.30 GHz:crying:
The revision of the processor is the same r0p4
@Netmatrix
Or you tinkering with the new kernel, and / or source code released?
it's my modified kernel but i don't have any speed improvement, and lowered the lowest stage at 199 Mhz
Netmatrix said:
it's my modified kernel but i don't have any speed improvement, and lowered the lowest stage at 199 Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it helps the battery to last longer!?