Related
Does anyone feel like posting their benchmarks on the custom ROMs they are running? I know not every GTab will run the same but I would like to get a basic idea of what the hottest scores are. Thanks.
TNT Lite 4.3.x with stock kernel is ~40 fps (Nenamark) and ~2300 in Quadrant. On average.
There are definitely higher scores than that, with some of the other modded ROMs.
2200 with vegan 5.11 Benchmark Atuntu
Thank you guys for posting your benches. I had seen some one some where, posting that they get 60fps. Any one getting 60fps?
there is guide in dev forum where you can get up to 77fps, but the recomended is under 75.
You might mean the frame rate. The default is 50, but TNT Lite and gADAM up the frame rate to 60. At least one mod ups it to 77.
That's not really a benchmark, though - I assumed you meant something like Quadrant.
Im running caulkins rom and clemsyn's kernel #6. I'm averaging around 2400 on quadrant and 3000 on smartbench. The only thing faster on smartbench is overclocked xoom
It looks like most of the new ROMs run pretty fast. If i can get 2200-2500 in Quadrant I will be happy.
I get a little over 3000 qudrant
johnboyjr said:
I get a little over 3000 qudrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what ROM/mods you are running?
i got several scores in the 2400s today and one personal best of 2518.
@johnboyjr
Are you bull****'n? 3000? i havent seen anyone say they are hitting the 3000 mark. I'd like to know what you're running too. Did you overclock? I dont think i want to overclock mine.
nsmartinez79 said:
Im running caulkins rom and clemsyn's kernel #6. I'm averaging around 2400 on quadrant and 3000 on smartbench. The only thing faster on smartbench is overclocked xoom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same setup on my gtab... got 39.1 fps in nenamark, and 2399 in quadrant.
I just set my gtab up today so it doesn't have much on it yet.
There is a post in the development section by chengu that has a loopback fix that enhances read/write speeds on the internal SD. This makes the I/O part of quadrant way faster. I have posted on that thread vegan stock 10x average is 2500+. With the loopback fix its a 10x average of 3100 with peaks of 3333. So no its not BS but really how much do quadrant (or any other test) effect daily functionality.? It is great for bragging rights though, especially to xoomers.
Sent from my Chromatic Magic using XDA Premium App
Mantara said:
There is a post in the development section by chengu that has a loopback fix that enhances read/write speeds on the internal SD. This makes the I/O part of quadrant way faster. I have posted on that thread vegan stock 10x average is 2500+. With the loopback fix its a 10x average of 3100 with peaks of 3333. So no its not BS but really how much do quadrant (or any other test) effect daily functionality.? It is great for bragging rights though, especially to xoomers.
Sent from my Chromatic Magic using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mantara, do you still have the link for loopback fix? I could not find it .
Thanks a lot in advance.
njshkb said:
Mantara, do you still have the link for loopback fix? I could not find it .
Thanks a lot in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=902426
Fyi: restart your tab 5 or six times, I know I sounds weird but it takes that many to streamline it completely. Let it stabilize after boot and then power down, wait 20 sectonds and and power on. It wil take up to six minutes on first boot and get less each time.
It uses boot time to write changes.
Have fun ;-)
loopback fix like others have said
Is there any down fall to using the loop back fix? Heat issues or failure? Why isnt anyone implementing this into their ROMs?
No adverse side effects that I have noticed. Most people have noticed a slight increese in playing video from internal memory and web browsing cashed sights. Read the thread its full of good info.
Sent from my Chromatic Magic using XDA Premium App
So I saw that people were getting some high scores in linpack. Like 100-120 (multithreaded)
So.. here's my scores:
Linpack: Singlethreaded : somewhere around 55 mostly
Multithreaded : Usually 80-90. sometimes around 92 and my highest score was 95 (only one time) Sometimes the scores get around 77 though
Quadrant: Best scores were around 3800 (only after several runs)
Smartbench: Cpu: Around 3850 Gpu: Around 2330
So people.. do these scores seem right?.. I always kill every app before running the tests.. Wifi on or off doesnt seem te make a lot difference.. (3g still on though). Im on kf3 and have not rooted my phone.
fenjen said:
So I saw that people were getting some high scores in linpack. Like 100-120 (multithreaded)
So.. here's my scores:
Linpack: Singlethreaded : somewhere around 55 mostly
Multithreaded : Usually 80-90. sometimes around 92 and my highest score was 95 (only one time) Sometimes the scores get around 77 though
Quadrant: Best scores were around 3800 (only after several runs)
Smartbench: Cpu: Around 3850 Gpu: Around 2330
So people.. do these scores seem right?.. I always kill every app before running the tests.. Wifi on or off doesnt seem te make a lot difference.. (3g still on though). Im on kf3 and have not rooted my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those scores seem about right to me.
jlevy73 said:
Those scores seem about right to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure about the linpack scores too? Or were they just with custom roms or something?
My benchmarks are: Fruit Ninja THD, www.eurogamer.net and 720p videos. Oh and does it play all the music files that I have?
So, my questions to you and the questions you should be asking yourself is: is it smooth? Is it sexy? Does it scroll through that full website without hitching?
If the answer is yes, you should be good to go.
garekinokami said:
My benchmarks are: Fruit Ninja THD, www.eurogamer.net and 720p videos. Oh and does it play all the music files that I have?
So, my questions to you and the questions you should be asking yourself is: is it smooth? Is it sexy? Does it scroll through that full website without hitching?
If the answer is yes, you should be good to go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly most people on here take benchmarks too seriously, they are just numbers and mean nothing in everyday usability of the phone. all that matters is if the phone is able to handle everything you throw at it, which the SGSII is more than capable of doing.
Regards
fenjen said:
Sure about the linpack scores too? Or were they just with custom roms or something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using stock KH3 and get about 85-95 with Linpack multi-thread. Scores over a 100 are with custom Rom and overclocking
Oh and it is running at 1.2ghz.. If that matters..
unleashed12 said:
Exactly most people on here take benchmarks too seriously, they are just numbers and mean nothing in everyday usability of the phone. all that matters is if the phone is able to handle everything you throw at it, which the SGSII is more than capable of doing.
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it does have random hiccups/jitters. For example sometimes when I scroll between homescreens (might be the widgets) but mostly seeing that some ppl were getting much higher scores made me wonder.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/updated-adreno-220-ics-gpu-driver-speeds-up-2d-rendering/
Has anyone tried this out on the Rezound? I'm guessing it would have the same effect on our phones, but I'm too busy to try it out today.
Flashed via TWRP Touch Recovery.
CleanROM DE 1.3
Antutu
No OC
Stock Adreno Driver
Score:6331
CleanROM DE 1.3
Antutu
No OC
Updated Adreno Driver
Score:6143
Take it for what it's worth. Force 2D rendering is not enabled on my phone, perhaps there would be a bigger difference there, don't really care enough to try at this point, lol
i just flashed the ruu an hour ago the only thing i had on my phone was my apps updated. and i was rooted.
first picture: without adreno update and 2d rendering UNCHECKED. score 2736
second picture: without adreno update and 2d redering CHECKED score 2872
third picture: WITH adreno update and 2d rendering UNCHECKED score 2216
forth picture: WITH adreno update and 2d rendering CHECKED score 2783
my conclusion is turn on rendering but dont install ADRENO UPDATE :/
mr2324jgf said:
Flashed via TWRP Touch Recovery.
CleanROM DE 1.3
Antutu
No OC
Stock Adreno Driver
Score:6331
CleanROM DE 1.3
Antutu
No OC
Updated Adreno Driver
Score:6143
Take it for what it's worth. Force 2D rendering is not enabled on my phone, perhaps there would be a bigger difference there, don't really care enough to try at this point, lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Benchmarks mean little next to actual experience
2. Score from just the 2D section in multiple runs with each driver would've been much better, all those other sections can and will vary and affect the overall score
3. Benchmarks mean little next to actual experience
PhantasmRezound said:
1. Benchmarks mean little next to actual experience
2. Score from just the 2D section in multiple runs with each driver would've been much better, all those other sections can and will vary and affect the overall score
3. Benchmarks mean little next to actual experience
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recognize you're trying to be funny...
Just.... for the record... the post in the OP state "significant boost" in scores when in reality, there aren't.
That's all I was saying. Just trying to contribute to the community
;-)
I guess the question is whether it feels any different. The post also states that UI rendering seems smoother, but of course this is impossible to truly measure.
chupajr said:
I guess the question is whether it feels any different. The post also states that UI rendering seems smoother, but of course this is impossible to truly measure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
believe me it felt alot smoother with youtube and stuff like that with the 2d rendering on without the adreno update.
i am now tryin to figure out how to uninstall the update??? maybe someone can help?
i wonder if i just redo the ruu?
sogone209 said:
believe me it felt alot smoother with youtube and stuff like that with the 2d rendering on without the adreno update.
i am now tryin to figure out how to uninstall the update??? maybe someone can help?
i wonder if i just redo the ruu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Restore your back up...
so it got worse when i installed his patch so i made my own with the latest drivers from the adreno site linked here https://developer.qualcomm.com/mobi...phics-optimization-adreno/tools-and-resources
this helps my phone out alot and im not sure if the latest leak did have these installed.. im not sure how to check but it works killer.
let me kno your results. thank you.
But there are more questions: Is it possible the updated drivers carry the workload on less power consumption? If there isn't a measurable difference, does it FEEL any different?
I suppose I needed an excuse to nandroid today anyway. I'll probably just try it out.
The adreno update is for battery saver. Consumes less
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
here is my score after installed the patch i made with the newest drivers instead of gjcamp's patch.
and im seeing a huge increase actually all around actually.
see picture
EclipseX said:
The adreno update is for battery saver. Consumes less
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could you verify where you got that information from?
I already tested this on BAMF 2.1. Anything updated past that has these already in place.
sogone209 said:
could you verify where you got that information from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, it does help. That is one thing I did notice.
sogone209 said:
here is my score after installed the patch i made with the newest drivers instead of gjcamp's patch.
and im seeing a huge increase actually all around actually.
see picture
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you have 2d rendering turned on? are you using the stock kernel? what release?
Snuzzo said:
I already tested this on BAMF 2.1. Anything updated past that has these already in place.
Actually, it does help. That is one thing I did notice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm i guess i didnt notice sense i only updated his patch to see my scores, maybe since the scores were lower to save battery all around?
well i made the patch to go back so ill flash his and see how battery goes. but sense this leak is already battery conservant i might like the speed and feel without his adreno update. we will see.
---------- Post added at 03:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:08 PM ----------
tspderek said:
do you have 2d rendering turned on? are you using the stock kernel? what release?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stock kernel no cpu apps.... and 2d redering is on sorry for not stating that. also on the latest ics leak firmware.
im loving the feel of my phone right now. best its ever been to be honest.
i highly doubt this will work for the rezound as the updated driver is for the s2 series of chips while the rezound uses the msm 8660 which is s3 the difference being the s2 running off arm7 architecture and the s3 running off arm 8. here is a link to qualcomms current cpu line and the series and architecture: qualcomm.com/chipsets/snapdragon
kieva1252 said:
i highly doubt this will work for the rezound as the updated driver is for the s2 series of chips while the rezound uses the msm 8660 which is s3 the difference being the s2 running off arm7 architecture and the s3 running off arm 8. here is a link to qualcomms current cpu line and the series and architecture: qualcomm.com/chipsets/snapdragon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats what i was thinking, he stated that it will work with all armv7 chips. hmm
so i went to the website and made a patch back... because i didnt make a backup.
kieva1252 said:
i highly doubt this will work for the rezound as the updated driver is for the s2 series of chips while the rezound uses the msm 8660 which is s3 the difference being the s2 running off arm7 architecture and the s3 running off arm 8. here is a link to qualcomms current cpu line and the series and architecture: qualcomm.com/chipsets/snapdragon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ARM8?
I think you're a little confused. The Rezound's MSM8660 chip is ARMv7.
Efficiency increased from 5223 to 6402. I'm not mad about that at all.
sogone209 said:
so it got worse when i installed his patch so i made my own with the latest drivers from the adreno site linked here https://developer.qualcomm.com/mobi...phics-optimization-adreno/tools-and-resources
this helps my phone out alot and im not sure if the latest leak did have these installed.. im not sure how to check but it works killer.
let me kno your results. thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this gave me a bump to 6555
Alright so: found the fastest sensless ROM was slimrom. With quadrant I scored about 4k on funky kernel. Mostly all sense based ROM scored around that that's with funky. Now that I installed rage ROM aosp I'm getting laggier performance in games and about a 2- 3k quadrant benchmark score. Same with antutu benchmark. Lower scores then on sense. This dosnt make sense. I thought aosp ROMs (cm9) were so pose to be godly and around faster then she sense based. But lower benchmark and lower fps and lag in games this sucks. Still running funky. I noticed that system tuner was acting up and making it do all weird things so I cleared data and uninstalled rebooted and still got same scores. Force GPU was checked in all ROMs and kernel versions. And all benchmarks were dine with ball the same CPU setting. Maybe an app is acting up and robing performance? I'm not get any abnormal heat or batter drain.
Did you check the built in cpu manager within the settings? If you have an app to govern it, they will battle over control causing lag.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Squirrel1620 said:
Did you check the built in cpu manager within the settings? If you have an app to govern it, they will battle over control causing lag.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and I only use the built in one to control. I was reading that this is a common problem with cm9 and going from android v 4.0.4 to 4.0.3 might fix it. As in different cm9 ROM.
Told you this before and hate to sound like a broken record. Don't use System Tuner with my kernel, use Android Tuner or CPU Tweaker (these replaced System Tuner for a reason) on Sense roms.
Snuzzo said:
Told you this before and hate to sound like a broken record. Don't use System Tuner with my kernel, use Android Tuner or CPU Tweaker (these replaced System Tuner for a reason) on Sense roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't touch any CPU settings with ST. None. Its pretty much installed for freezing apps task manager to see what's running and the widget. That's it. All CPU settings are dine through CM in the performance section.
NEVER NEVER NEVER turn force GPU rendering on (breaks MANY apps), thats the BIGGEST mistake MANY people do on these forums along with those so-called universal "build.prop" tweaks which do absolutely nothing. Try using the stock kernel first to see if its kernel related.
richii0207 said:
NEVER NEVER NEVER turn force GPU rendering on (breaks MANY apps), thats the BIGGEST mistake MANY people do on these forums along with those so-called universal "build.prop" tweaks which do absolutely nothing. Try using the stock kernel first to see if its kernel related.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tested both games mc3 and nova 3 and both run better with it enabled. I've also tried multiple versions of kernel. Found 1.4 gives good performance and battery I've read tho that it is is a cm9 problem and that its "known"??r idk how true that is tho. Its mainly just games that I'm lagging on.
Quadrider10 said:
I've tested both games mc3 and nova 3 and both run better with it enabled. I've also tried multiple versions of kernel. Found 1.4 gives good performance and battery I've read tho that it is is a cm9 problem and that its "known"??r idk how true that is tho. Its mainly just games that I'm lagging on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not have GPU rendering enabled, on stock kernel and my games run smooth.
Quadrider10 said:
I don't touch any CPU settings with ST. None. Its pretty much installed for freezing apps task manager to see what's running and the widget. That's it. All CPU settings are dine through CM in the performance section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should probably uninstall ST reboot and see if that fixes your issues.
zetsumeikuro said:
You should probably uninstall ST reboot and see if that fixes your issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried. Nothing.
Any ;new when Neo is gonna push out his CM10 build? I think aims just wait for that see if that dolv s the problem if not them back to slimrom.
It won't be released until the CM10 devs give the go ahead. But I don't think you'll like it any more than what you've been running.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
whens that gonna be?
cm10 is based off of JB though and from what i read, jb is crqzy smooth because vsync was disabled? idk but i read that its insanely smooth
Quadrider10 said:
whens that gonna be?
cm10 is based off of JB though and from what i read, jb is crqzy smooth because vsync was disabled? idk but i read that its insanely smooth
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Triple buffering. You're thinking about triple buffering. We'll only get all those benefits with a full implementation of Project Butter, which is not automatic with jellybean. Right now, what we have is very uneven. Some things are smooth, some things are choppier. Getting a full ION implementation should smooth things out, but it still won't be Project Butter.
shrike1978 said:
Triple buffering. You're thinking about triple buffering. We'll only get all those benefits with a full implementation of Project Butter, which is not automatic with jellybean. Right now, what we have is very uneven. Some things are smooth, some things are choppier. Getting a full ION implementation should smooth things out, but it still won't be Project Butter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ohhh i see.... but like is that lag and fps drop just a problem with cm9, or is it just my phone?
what auntutu benchmark and quadrant scores do you get?
Quadrider10 said:
ohhh i see.... but like is that lag and fps drop just a problem with cm9, or is it just my phone?
what auntutu benchmark and quadrant scores do you get?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8860 - Antutu
3030 - Quadrant
nolimit78 said:
8860 - Antutu
3030 - Quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what was your fps on both tests?
my antutu score was 8094 cpu and everything set to max speed.
Quadrider10 said:
what was your fps on both tests?
my antutu score was 8094 cpu and everything set to max speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which part on each test? I'll have to do it again to check.. the test results don't tell me that info.
nolimit78 said:
Which part on each test? I'll have to do it again to check.. the test results don't tell me that info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in the knights test it tells you on bottom.... in sense roms i got about 59 in cm9 i get about 45-50. in both tests. somehting has to be wrong your getting a score of 800 better then me and running close to the same kernel and rom ish....
Quadrider10 said:
in the knights test it tells you on bottom.... in sense roms i got about 59 in cm9 i get about 45-50. in both tests. somehting has to be wrong your getting a score of 800 better then me and running close to the same kernel and rom ish....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
56.74 FPS
Post your bench mark results;
Rom - Viper's 4.1 latest
Kernel - ButterToast 16.2
Governor - Lag Free
Scheduler - BFQ
CPU Freq - 1566 MHz
No under/over volting .
I'm sure I could retrieve higher scores if I were to over clock it a bit more. Over volt and use a more aggressive Governor...
This is my daily config / setup.
Sent from my shooter using Tapatalk 2.3b
here
here
here
here
here
here
here
here
here
here
here
And a few more threads on top of that, all posted in this General forum.
We probably don't need another benchmark thread.
ramjet73
.... Mod in training ?
Sent from my shooter using Tapatalk 2
hightech316 said:
.... Mod in training ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that was the case I would have suggested you use the search functions before posting instead of linking the threads for you.
Do you really think another benchmark thread is necessary versus just posting in one of the many that have already been created? If you are going to start a new one I suggest that it be a little more focused than 'let's post our benchmarks'. At least a common benchmark utility as has been done in some of the previous threads, and maybe focused on a particular Android version (GB, ICS, JB).
So no, I'm not a mod in training, just a user that is tired of seeing the same thread topics posted over and over. And what I linked in my previous response should satisfy your curiosity and then some.
ramjet73
new setup
heres the benchmarks for my new setup...
still gotta tweak it a bit.
spurfan33 said:
heres the benchmarks for my new setup...
still gotta tweak it a bit.
View attachment 1795241
View attachment 1795242
View attachment 1795243
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty low actually, the most i could get is between 9000-10000 in antutu.
I got the biggest .
Close this junk thread .
Running Asphalt 6 with no lag.
anryl said:
I got the biggest .
Close this junk thread .
Running Asphalt 6 with no lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is bigger than yours.
Mmm...
Evo 3d with Viper3D_1.6.3_R330 and ButteredToast-RLS16.3. OC 1.78ghz
8656
8656
CyanogenMod 10.1
Android 4.2.2 - Unofficial
(WILD FOR THE NIGHT RESURRECTED)
CPU Freq - 1512 MHz
:good: