I used to be getting 3200-3600 on my gs 2 but ever since I flashed unnamed 1.3 and icscrewed 1.1 I've been getting score ranging from 2800-3200
Is this suppose to happen?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
The numbers mean absolutely nothing as far as how the phone runs. If they go up or down doesn't mean anything unless you like showing off your epeen....
Benchmarks don't mean that much (except large differences 1000+). How quick does the phone respond? Does it feel fast? If so great. If not, keep working.
Sent from my páhhōniē
I see.
I'm not a least bit regret about flashing unnamed because my phone is ridiculously fast right now.
I guess quadrant score really doesn't mean anything lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
honghsien5 said:
I used to be getting 3200-3600 on my gs 2 but ever since I flashed unnamed 1.3 and icscrewed 1.1 I've been getting score ranging from 2800-3200
Is this suppose to happen?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really? you should be getting around 9,999,999 if you're using quadrant. thats about how accurate that app is. its a worthless piece of junk that you shouldn't use to measure the speed of your device dude. just use your phone and weight it out from real-world user experience.
Related
How fast is the phone did the ota slow it down and does any phone have any lag or differnt from one phone like the sensation where one phone lags more then the other
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Speed is relative. This phone is wicked.
BANG! from my shooter...
The EVO 3D has more RAM than the Sensation so it will be faster. I have not noticed any lag what so ever. I performed both OTA updates.
1.2ghz dual core... it will be faster for just about everything than any other phone on the market (well, it will be equivalent to the other dc phones out there...). I messed around with it for about a half hour at the sprint store just now and it seemed snappier than my oc tmo g2 running at 1.5ghz, which is saying something.
Sounds great cant wait till tommerow I know the ram thing but they are saying some phone are running better then others and they have 2 differnt screens
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Faster than any phone I've used so far, or any Android-based tablet.
Slower than my gaming rig.
It's faster than my overclocked Asus Transformer. Yes that's running honeycomb and higher res.
I can open the full espn.com with all flash turned on and it scrolls smoothly and as one review yesterday pointed out you never see the checkerboards it's that fast. When I first activated it and put my google account on I was showing my bro how fast it was (we both have Evos) and we both realized this was much faster, then after that I go to market and realized the whole time I was showing him that the phone was downloading and installing apps, needless to say it was even quicker at opening apps up once that was done.
Real fast. As others have said, there is just no lag, ever. Can't wait to see it overclocked!
Fast as lightning.
sent from my 3D
PHONE IS ****ING FAST
/thread
I think it does zero to 60 in 2.2 secs
austontatious said:
Real fast. As others have said, there is just no lag, ever. Can't wait to see it overclocked!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, you're sick! I like it!
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Oh man tomorrow can't come soon enough! Can't f'ing wait!
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Not fast in benchmarks... But its fast.
donatom3 said:
you never see the checkerboards it's that fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android doesn't show checkerboards on page loading.
codito said:
Android doesn't show checkerboards on page loading.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever the blank spots were on my Evo before, that's what I'm talking about.
austontatious said:
Real fast. As others have said, there is just no lag, ever. Can't wait to see it overclocked!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you need to over clock the fastest phone out there right now that has no lag what so ever.
If there is already zero lag, what would less lag then that be called?
[email protected] said:
If there is already zero lag, what would less lag then that be called?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...Better?
[email protected] said:
Why would you need to over clock the fastest phone out there right now that has no lag what so ever.
If there is already zero lag, what would less lag then that be called?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Why on earth would anyone feel like they need to OC something that already doesn't have any lag? What would they gain except faster battery drain and overheat??
Fast and smooth, seems like no task slows it down. Apps open faster and run much better. Could not be more pleased with the speed.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Why the g2x had SO MUCH better benchmark scores now before anyone says I'm *****ing know that I'm not I'm just asking why 2 phones with the same processors have such diff scores the photon NEVER goes over 60 fps in quadrant but the g2x gets like 100+ and out had 1080p video recording like wtf was motorola thinking sprints best motorola phone is average now a data now I'm just asking why cause that's really annoying but honestly this is just a question not *****ing again
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
because moto blur takes up more processing power ALSO the the photon has a 1ghz dual core and teh e4gt has a 1.2 ghz dual core. same ram i believe... but honestly until internet speeds are crazy increaded and battery life is maximized idc they all run around the same speed imo.
I think the G2X uses a different cpu/gpu.
clifton421 said:
I think the G2X uses a different cpu/gpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
I think it's software Optimization.
Its almost the same spec,and maybe our photon dont use its full power to conserve battery? Like shut down one core or something?
another viewpoint its the drivers.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Motorola has qHD resolution, so the gpu has to push 25% more pixels.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Isn't g2x stock vanilla android? That makes a world of difference
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
I thought it used hummingbird processor
Gh0zt718 said:
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
The MoPho runs circles around the POS!
Sent from my MoPho using the XDA Premium app
Gh0zt718 said:
Why the g2x had SO MUCH better benchmark scores now before anyone says I'm *****ing know that I'm not I'm just asking why 2 phones with the same processors have such diff scores the photon NEVER goes over 60 fps in quadrant but the g2x gets like 100+ and out had 1080p video recording like wtf was motorola thinking sprints best motorola phone is average now a data now I'm just asking why cause that's really annoying but honestly this is just a question not *****ing again
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the things that throws of the result is the nonstandard resolution of the Photon. This odd screen size requires scaling be used to run most benchmarks full screen. On an unscaled Smartbench run the scores are much higher than scaled and are fairly close to the GSII NVidia.
Gh0zt718 said:
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are three different CPU's used in the GSII (NVidia, Samsung, Qualcomm). The benchmarks vary with the Qualcomm being the bottom of the list.
AnTuTu Stock cpu speeds
scores - SGII = 5777
HSPDA = 18 Mbps
picture of bench mark
trutulsa.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sg.jpg
At&t samsung galaxy 2 vs Verizon bionic
scores - SGII = 5777 Bionic=4955
Here is a video with benchmark and hsdpa speeds.
youtube.com/watch?v=dRW66yTMcOg
Quadrant
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
I constantly see reviewers refer to this phone as the fastest one available, but a number of benchmarks showed it being beaten by the LG Optimus 2x..how does that work? Even better GPU?
Samsung cap there Gpu at 60 frames
mcorrie1121 said:
I constantly see reviewers refer to this phone as the fastest one available, but a number of benchmarks showed it being beaten by the LG Optimus 2x..how does that work? Even better GPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
mcorrie1121 said:
I constantly see reviewers refer to this phone as the fastest one available, but a number of benchmarks showed it being beaten by the LG Optimus 2x..how does that work? Even better GPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would not to much faith on benchmarks. Sure their cool to see. But in the end, through user interaction, screen scrolls, etc. It's all relative. This phone is a beast, it will still be for another year when it's replaced by the Galaxy S III and it will laugh at the iPhone 5.
My Benchmarks on Stock
Here are my benchmarks using Quadrant on the stock ROM. It should be alot better (if thats possible) on a custom ROM.
That's what I got
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
I get that easily on a stock leaked 2.3.5 AT&T Captivate ROM.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
I don't know if I can believe that, this has better hardware all the way around.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
I will post a picture later. When I have my phone, left it at home and I'm at a friends house.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
yoneilio said:
I don't know if I can believe that, this has better hardware all the way around.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it's also not 2.3.5 on the SGSII.
b-eock said:
I get that easily on a stock leaked 2.3.5 AT&T Captivate ROM.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but if you used quadrant pro and saw the score broken down you'd understand that it is just artificially inflated. There are multiple tweaks that boost quadrant benchmarks that do nothing noticeable otherwise.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
Just wondering what other's benchmark scores were on Antutu? Do you have your phone OC'ed? Mine was always around 8200 however after trying out a new kernel to fix my call audio issue the benchmark fell to 7800.. Is that a big difference? It seems that all of the devices scoring over 9k are all on 4.1.2, is there really anything to that? Just kind of wanted to get a discussion going since I do not see any other threads about it on the Q&A section.
Edit- Well I just moved my apps back to the sd after doing all of the flashing and now it's back up to 8228!
Good info. Did you run the stability tests also and were they the same at the higher speeds. Also are you using the paid version or free? Thanks
Edit: Mine were only 7377. And I see there is no paid version. Seems I have work to do to speed things up..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Of course no comparison between users is possible because speeds depend more on the cellular/data traffic at the tower you are connected to than the ROM/modem you are trying to measure.
These measurements can be slightly useful for a user to compare ROMs/modems in the area they typically use their service.
Your difference of 400 is the size of a text message, so no, not significant. But it feels better, I'm sure.
It's checking the speed of the CPU, ram, video and SD card read/ write right? What difference would modem and such have?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
The OP mentioned call audio issues, and benchmarks, so I thought he was measuring network speed. If I assumed incorrectly, please forgive me.
Yeah maybe your right now that I re-read it. And I just loaded the program so really don't know what all it measures..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I was more or less just wondering if the stats were changed based on what kernel or ROM you may be running or if there was something else that could change the performance. After seeing the sgs4 benchmarks I feel like that phone must be the smoothest thing ever because it is head and shoulders better scores than the note.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Sorry for the double post but ranger are you sure it is testing the download/upload? I did not think that was included.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Hey everyone had a question about the jb update. Sense i updated ive ran benchmarks and im getting results for native score the same or less than the gs3. Before on ics it ran much higher than the gs3. Can anyone tell me why this is or if anyone else is having the same results im using cf bench btw. Also my battery percentage is going up and down on its own without charging jumping multiple percentages.
Are benchmarks really a big deal? The phone flies and is perfectly smooth
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Like tdnick said, its just a benchmark. The phone runs much smoother than before so I wouldn't take it too seriously.
I have to say mine is slower in most ways.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
chrisphoenix7 said:
I have to say mine is slower in most ways.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LGNPST back to ICS. :good:
Odd I'm getting very close to the same benches on ICS and the stock JB.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
I may be wrong but I think the default I/O is fiops. Change to deadline for that placebo effect of high benchmark scores. (Or the other way around. I have no idea what fiops is lol.) :3
Sent from my Paranoid Neximus G
responses
I just felt it was running much slower than ics and thats what made me check the benchmarks and they were way down. Im going to factory reset and then reinstall jb. Lol well see how this goes.