Miui rom 1.12.9 antutu benchmark score 6344 Conferring. How do I get the high score. There are people who have taken the 8900 points. Thanks.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Overclock to 1.6 ghz.
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
But I have done tests with the 1.2 mhz.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
miui is extremely smooth and fast, why would you need more than this
This fast enough, you can upgrade your beautiful. Wouldn't it be more.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
i have reached 7459 with 1.6ghz,but to be honest wasting battery life for that performance,there arent any games or apps which will use all those 1.6ghz, i have set using only one core 500-1000mhz and it is enough for watching hd films,surfing the net,even playing hd games like pes2012 or nova2
6344 is perfectly normal for a CM7 based ROM @ 1.2 GHz
OK thank you for your information.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
I only get 6025 @ 1.6ghz on NDT MIUI.
= What are you even doing asking whether or not you should root your phone on XDA?! =
@Skellyyy: If you didn't already, run the tests using the Performance govenor, but make sure you switch to something else again afterwards (the performance govenor runs at full speed all the time and thus doesn't waste any time changing clock speed, but uses alot of power).
- Martin
Martin5000 said:
@Skellyyy: If you didn't already, run the tests using the Performance govenor, but make sure you switch to something else again afterwards (the performance govenor runs at full speed all the time and thus doesn't waste any time changing clock speed, but uses alot of power).
- Martin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah, nooby mistake! I got 7307 so.
= What are you even doing asking whether or not you should root your phone on XDA?! =
Related
I have the 2.1 siyah kernel and i left it in perfomance govener for a few hours by mistake is it ok too run 1.6ghz for a few hours stright
Actually SGS2 is too fast already and i see no need for OC at all
Anyway, i don't really know about that kernel, but i believe that at 1,6GHz it increases voltage which isn't too good thing and might reduce processors life time.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Unless you make 100% usage at 1.6 ghz for some straight hours, its not going to harm you and your mobile except your battery life
Heat is a cpus worst enemy. Also keep the voltage in mind when ocing. Your phone will only be running at 1.6 under full load so a couple of hours of max activity will get the phone hot and with heat come instability.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I dont know if it was running %100 cpu but it was at 1600mhz the whole time right now everything is ok but it seems to get slightly warm quick and runs 31 celius battrey but that might just be normal
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
31 sounds right
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Would I get better speed if I disabled 1ghz frequency and left 1.2ghz the default Max frequency?
Would it be faster?
Or slower? Or nothing?
Don't like the 1ghz frequency. But I notice my phone is a little slower when disabling. It.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I thought you were making a kernel with 1.9 ghz overclock? That should be fast enough
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Appl
Kidding, correct?
1.2 > 1.0
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Good to see enyo has found where he belongs in xda. Asking questions and learning.
This is a big improvement enyo.
as to 1.2 feeling slower, your putting a massive undervolt on it. Try backing it off a bit and see if responsiveness comes back. Also, higher clock speeds can lead to better battery in theory by completing tasks faster and allowing the CPU to govern back down to a idle state.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
Good to see enyo has found where he belongs in xda. Asking questions and learning.
This is a big improvement enyo.
as to 1.2 feeling slower, your putting a massive undervolt on it. Try backing it off a bit and see if responsiveness comes back. Also, higher clock speeds can lead to better battery in theory by completing tasks faster and allowing the CPU to govern back down to a idle state.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Your right. Backed to -75mV on 1.2ghz and faster response came back.
Also it because really fast after switching to the Medium Leakage.
I rarely let my phone sleep, so 1.2 is the maximum I'll go for speed/battery.
But, the more you UV, you get laggy if its too low, but stable?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
Thanks. Your right. Backed to -75mV on 1.2ghz and faster response came back.
Also it because really fast after switching to the Medium Leakage.
I rarely let my phone sleep, so 1.2 is the maximum I'll go for speed/battery.
But, the more you UV, you get laggy if its too low, but stable?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly -50uv across the board yields the best performance, battery life and reliability.
droidstyle said:
Honestly -50uv across the board yields the best performance, battery life and reliability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a advantage if it's undervolted 100+ mV?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
Is there a advantage if it's undervolted 100+ mV?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
droidstyle said:
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So -50mV is just enough?
I'll do that. Your good with setups of oc/uv.
Seems really stable for me.
Trying Low leakage for better battery. But Medium is perfect right
Now.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
droidstyle said:
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just tried your setup. And I didn't know how slow my phone was till I used yours. So undervolting to much does slow down your phone. And it Got hot out of no where.
Thanks
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Who prefers LiveOC over the regular OC system?
Just wondering.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I prefer to use voltage control and overclock the ol' fashioned way lol...I have played with nstools and live oc, but its more than I really need.
110%, 1320 mhz, stock voltages
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
110%, 1320 mhz, stock voltages
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which governor do you use? GlitchOndemand
Glitchass v2
Conservative
Interactive
Powersave
Performance
Lazy
Smoothass
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
i use glitchondemand/ fiops overclocked @ 1500mhz with no undervolt.
Enyo. said:
Which governor do you use? GlitchOndemand
Glitchass v2
Conservative
Interactive
Powersave
Performance
Lazy
Smoothass
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock..
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
droidstyle said:
i use glitchondemand/ fiops overclocked @ 1500mhz with no undervolt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No heat?
Is this dangerous? With no overheat, is this dangerous? Are you using this day to day?
Didn't get into oc too much.
neh4pres said:
Stock..
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks so much
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
No heat?
Is this dangerous? With no overheat, is this dangerous?
I've never overclocked this high before. Didn't get into oc too much.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So.. You never tested 1.9 ghz before you released your kang kernel?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
So.. You never tested 1.9 ghz before you released your kang kernel?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tested it.
For a day or two.
But using my phone day to day.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
enyo... I have tested with glitch kernel at 1.7 ghz and i currently hold the record benchmark for this device on antutu using performance governor. After testing for a half hour at that speed i fell asleep with the phone stuck at that speed. I'm typing this message with that phone now. That was done with glitch v13. The most i ever got from high clock speeds was freezes and reboots.
However, if you get stupid with live oc the story can be very different.
But to give an idea of what my phone handled back then, go to the cm7 glitch thread and check what the gpu/buss speed was at 1.7ghz. But remember that those bus/cpu speeds, and voltages were finely tuned by tk , and you probably won't be able to push that hard with live oc.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
enyo... I have tested with glitch kernel at 1.7 ghz and i currently hold the record benchmark for this device on antutu using performance governor. After testing for a half hour at that speed i fell asleep with the phone stuck at that speed. I'm typing this message with that phone now. That was done with glitch v13. The most i ever got from high clock speeds was freezes and reboots.
However, if you get stupid with live oc the story can be very different.
But to give an idea of what my phone handled back then, go to the cm7 glitch thread and check what the gpu/buss speed was at 1.7ghz. But remember that those bus/cpu speeds, and voltages were finely tuned by tk , and you probably won't be able to push that hard with live oc.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So just overclocking, @ 1.5GHz or 1.2GHz and, monitoring the temp, processor will last just as long as it would non overclocked?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
So just overclocking, @ 1.5GHz or 1.2GHz and, monitoring the temp, processor will last just as long as it would non overclocked?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's all luck. Chance. Fate. If tk has not burned his phone yet i would say you have a lot of catching up to do to get the mileage he has. I had mine overclocked 1.5ghz for a few months.. And guess what, i have never monitored temp. But hey, i pay an extra couple dollars a month on top of insurance for lifetime warrantee. So i think my phone burning up would fall under that. But anyway, your stressing out to much over it.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
It's all luck. Chance. Fate. If tk has not burned his phone yet i would say you have a lot of catching up to do to get the mileage he has. I had mine overclocked 1.5ghz for a few months.. And guess what, i have never monitored temp. But hey, i pay an extra couple dollars a month on top of insurance for lifetime warrantee. So i think my phone burning up would fall under that. But anyway, your stressing out to much over it.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much.
Going to over clock to 1.5, not going to stress about it. Ulcers come like that
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
no heat and i use it daily...first time i can ever say this when overclocking to 1500. i agree with neh4pres posts...becareful with live oc it can screw your device up quick. most folks will never see any benifit by using live oc imo anyway. part of the reason why i just use vc...
I actually use 10% live oc and 1200mhz step... All voltages stock. Fully stable and it FLIES
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
I must have every bit of speed. That said here's the setup:
ICS AKOP 25 Glitch 14 B5 for 6.0
1200 step with 118 LOC
Glitch OnDemand with some OV and UV. (see pics)
Live OC is the way to go as you get a boost to your GPU and RAM in addition to the usual CPU bump.
thisguy23 said:
I must have every bit of speed. That said here's the setup:
ICS AKOP 25 Glitch 14 B5 for 6.0
1200 step with 118 LOC
Glitch OnDemand with some OV and UV. (see pics)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thx a bunch for this nfo. just used ur voltage settings for my device and was able to overclock into the 1300mhz range from the 1200 step. im impressed since last time it was very unstable at 1200 for me.
thx.
swagooo said:
thx a bunch for this nfo. just used ur voltage settings for my device and was able to overclock into the 1300mhz range from the 1200 step. im impressed since last time it was very unstable at 1200 for me.
thx.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with the devil kernel i have been running 102% loc between 200-1000mhz. on glitch i can oc up to 1500mhz with no loc, soon as i add any loc the device freezes. im guessing my leakage is not dialed in correctly for glitch, also i get a bit nervous playing wit arm voltages.
droidstyle said:
with the devil kernel i have been running 102% loc between 200-1000mhz. on glitch i can oc up to 1500mhz with no loc, soon as i add any loc the device freezes. im guessing my leakage is not dialed in correctly for glitch, also i get a bit nervous playing wit arm voltages.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try these i have not had a reboot in over a week
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Whoa...a lotof views,,but nut sure either
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
I don't think I have an answer, but you have to ask a question before you get an answer.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
takota6 said:
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was running newts rls1 and getting 3600 quadrant and 6500+ antutu. When I switched to rls3 everything went down...so back to rls1 for me.
Other people have pointed out and I find this to work, that if you use setcpu and check "enable profiles", the 2nd core is turned on. I went ahead and set a screen off profile of 192/192 (max/min). I"m experimenting with these values, though. It seems I can knock down my mA use (per Battery Monitor Widget) by using the profile. The cpu does appear to be scaling properly. Many people have said not to use any of these cpu things and I did have some trouble with setcpu previously but it seems to be doing its thing with RLS1 anyway.
takota6 said:
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Programs probably just are't reading it right.
Speaking generally, the 2nd core will sit idle until needed, so it may be 'offline' when those apps check.
Until we get custom kernels/kernel source, there isn't much that can be done about it.
Sent from my evolving Rezound.
Lunatic summed it up perfectly. There are 2 cores, but the applications can't "see" them
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1496934 If you read through this thread the OP talks about the mpdecision not working properly. Basically it's the file that governs when both cores are on etc. It is something that can affect synthetic benches, but not real world performance. Probably why current ****s given by HTC = 0. Quadrant = trash and benches are for jerking off to numbers which generally is not an indicative to device performance. But whatever floats your boat I suppose .
Kool txs every1,,and I do use benchmarks to how my current Rom or tweak us working,,most of us are visual and need a program to tell us how it is..but I'm glad there s alot of hardcore peps to do the schooling
Perflock. There is no CPU management. Using setcpu doesn't do anything...its all in your head.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
It's like using a condom with a hole in it. There's no purpose for it, it'll only cause problems or children.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
If you use setcpu or similar and change pretty much any settings it should force the second core to do work.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
Like a couple others have said kernel source is the answer
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
I done benchmark test in my new SGS3 I9300, As previously i have seen in many videos that after test S3 is winner but after my test My Device was on second Place.. Why So? Is there any problem in my device???
What benchmark test did you run?
Benchmarks are really just numbers dude, if your device performs well in day to day use then it's fine
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Benchmark in S3
I run Quadrant Standard Edition & AnTuTu Benchmark both..its was 20 to 40 fps..
ravitomar said:
I run Quadrant Standard Edition & AnTuTu Benchmark both..its was 20 to 40 fps..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Turn off power saving and run the antutu test again it should read at 60 fps
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
I run my s3 on three different benchmark apps. In quadratn the score was 5340
In antutu 13567
In geekbench 2 1876
What wer your scores??
And obviously s3 will not be first because htc one x+ , note 2, nexus 4 will score higher cause of the 2gigs of ram and they are overclocked
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
IntenseTorture said:
I run my s3 on three different benchmark apps. In quadratn the score was 5340
In antutu 13567
In geekbench 2 1876
What wer your scores??
And obviously s3 will not be first because htc one x+ , note 2, nexus 4 will score higher cause of the 2gigs of ram and they are overclocked
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmark scores are different depending on what kernel and Rom you are using.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Im on stock jb
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
IntenseTorture said:
Im on stock jb
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found using shiyah kernel my benchmark was higher than stock kernel also the benchmark differs whether you have power saving on or off as with off it gives a higher score as on limits the cpu.
Also depends on what you have running in the background or if you've overclocked etc etc
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
IntenseTorture said:
Im on stock jb
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks don't really mean anything!! And most of the time benchmarks are software manipulated....
You should judge your phone by its behavior, if it lags, stutters or drains battery you have a problem. If not it's okay!!!
my benchmark
mine were, In quadratn the score was 9334
In antutu 11025....
ravitomar said:
mine were, In quadratn the score was 9334
In antutu 11025....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant 9334? Looks like you made a world record !
Well I get 14.9 k in antutu & 7k in quadrant the biggest thing which effects Is the temperature of phone if its hot then scores will reduce because cpu throttles and underclocks too 800mhz
But benchmarks don't matter much
sent from my gs3 GT i 9300
----------------------------------
Dual boot siyah kernel
1st rom stock jb 4.1.1
2nd rom cm 10 4.1.2-4.2
Mine:
Quadrant: 6464
ES 2.0: 47.00
Antutu: 18153
I used to worry about quadrant scores, until I realized that they truly mean nothing compared to other devices. The only times the scores are handy for is comparing runs OF YOUR OWN PHONE. That's it, nothing else.
------------------------------------
If it was easy you'd of hired the guy at Home Depot to to it.
ravitomar said:
mine were, In quadratn the score was 9334
In antutu 11025....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Turn off power saving and run again