Can someone building this app from github? It looks pretty cool, but I don't know how to build nor do I think I have the equipment to.
Thanks!
Link: http://onskreen.com/cornerstone/index.php
Sent from my GT-P7510
I think I can f*p to this
Developers, please help! , this could help take multitasking on android tablets to a whole new level!
Would like to see this myself!
Thats really really cool, hope the developers here will do a build with ICS with that fantastic experiment!
CyanogenMod team is working in building it into CM9.
Think it's only compatible with ics and gingerbread when ics is more common on devices I think more cooks will add it. I can't believe their is not more interest from dev on this. Cm9 and Thor, are building this into their rom.
Not an APP. This has to be built into the ROM itself. I have been searching for the "user built ROMS" on Onskreen's website but with no luck. CMteam is adding it to CM9 but a flashable zip to drop the right files into the right places would be increadible. This would give most people the option to use what ROM they want and then flash the "Cornerstone into said ROM. I am excited about this.
Including this into the ROMs might make Google decide to pull ROMs out of access to the Android Market I've read.
Not sure if and how this would all pan out.
edit: if CM would include this as an optional package that would remove the risk of excluding ROMs to the market, nice find mtjnkee
work in progress? or already an app ready?
I thunk it'll still a work in progress.
Sent from my GT-P7510
http://forum.aokp.co/topic/38-build-23-special-onskreen-edition-wifi-only/
Roman from the aokp rom has a special edition of his rom with cornerstone built in. It is buggy (onskreen needs to fix it up a bit), but if you want to test it out here it is. For the wifi 10.1
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
task650 said:
CyanogenMod team is working in building it into CM9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in an overnight build of AOKP--a one-time thing, I believe. It has a long way to go to be generally useable.
Skilover said:
It's in an overnight build of AOKP--a one-time thing, I believe. It has a long way to go to be generally useable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but when I made the original post he hadn't included it yet.
Any roms for the a500 with this built in yet. Available now?
I think that once more devices start to implement ICS then we will see a much faster development time for these sort of OS enhancements
task650 said:
CyanogenMod team is working in building it into CM9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For interested readers: plus(dot)google(dot)com/117962666888533781522/posts/bPKE7qtvwC9 CyanogenMod - The Cornerstone Breakup
So IMHO they're more on building an own solution to this, taking Cornerstone as an origin.
If anyone has a Touchpad laying around there is an CM9 Kang ROM with Cornerstone baked in over in the Touchpad development section.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1501637
Any progress?
Related
Before I start, I need to pay my respects to the developers for all the great effort trying to make our ACES one hell of a phone.
Ok, if we were to sum it up as far as cyanogenmod development goes for the Samsung Galaxy Ace we have the following:
1. BehradGH Rom stable but some bugs or apps that don't work. A bit heavier than the following
2. Grif_07 Rom which appears to be the most stable
3. CM7.2 BY J.A.F which is developed by Russians who made a very good job and this one seems to be the fastest so far and very stable. This based on Grif_07 if I am not wrong. A thread started for this one, I believe this one has minor bugs cause I am testing it.
...And of course lots of others that diserve recognition
So if there's going to be an official version on which version is going to be based on and who's deciding for that? How's the whole thing going? Cause as far as I can see we get new roms probably from different working groups quite often but what's the point if they all choose their own path? I mean someone should decide the path so all the developers can work it out and reach the destination --> The Official version of Cyanogen for Ace. I would appreciate and I believe not only me but a whole lotta bunch of people if we were told what's the plan. Just a few words.
I see many great ideas in here, for example jusada took the first two roms and modified them to barebones. Really nice move and quite impressive roms, fast and quite stable but again not bug free (oh man, why you stopped dealing with this???).
Anyway, a few words from the right people would be great. I love cyanogen and I would go donate if we ever get an official rom. Thanks!
Belongs to the general subforum.
The 3 roms has problem with Facebook login on 3rd party programs Like IM+ , Meebo, etc, the only way for me to get facebook chat on a third party was making a meebo account and adding all my accounts into my meebo account and then loging in with my meebo account on the meebo app for android rofl. also CM7.2 BY J.A.F has problem after flashing gapps and everytime my device start it force close gmail and doesn´t connect to Google server to add my google account in the device.
itasoulas said:
Before I start, I need to pay my respects to the developers for all the great effort trying to make our ACES one hell of a phone.
Ok, if we were to sum it up as far as cyanogenmod development goes for the Samsung Galaxy Ace we have the following:
1. BehradGH Rom stable but some bugs or apps that don't work. A bit heavier than the following
2. Grif_07 Rom which appears to be the most stable
3. CM7.2 BY J.A.F which is developed by Russians who made a very good job and this one seems to be the fastest so far and very stable. This based on Grif_07 if I am not wrong. A thread started for this one, I believe this one has minor bugs cause I am testing it.
...And of course lots of others that diserve recognition
So if there's going to be an official version on which version is going to be based on and who's deciding for that? How's the whole thing going? Cause as far as I can see we get new roms probably from different working groups quite often but what's the point if they all choose their own path? I mean someone should decide the path so all the developers can work it out and reach the destination --> The Official version of Cyanogen for Ace. I would appreciate and I believe not only me but a whole lotta bunch of people if we were told what's the plan. Just a few words.
I see many great ideas in here, for example jusada took the first two roms and modified them to barebones. Really nice move and quite impressive roms, fast and quite stable but again not bug free (oh man, why you stopped dealing with this???).
Anyway, a few words from the right people would be great. I love cyanogen and I would go donate if we ever get an official rom. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I understand what you're saying. All the devs work on one beast godlike rom. That would be pretty epic.
itasoulas said:
So if there's going to be an official version on which version is going to be based on and who's deciding for that? How's the whole thing going? Cause as far as I can see we get new roms probably from different working groups quite often but what's the point if they all choose their own path? I mean someone should decide the path so all the developers can work it out and reach the destination --> The Official version of Cyanogen for Ace. I would appreciate and I believe not only me but a whole lotta bunch of people if we were told what's the plan. Just a few words.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Official CyanogenMod for Ace would be developed by official CyanogenMod developers, AFAIK (CMIIW). It wouldn't be based on either because the CM developers would use their own source code (if I'm not mistaken, Behrad's CM7 port was taken from Galaxy Mini's CM7 port, and only recently has it been identified as device "cooper").
I agree that things might be better if all those wicked devs worked together to get one demigod ROM, but we like variety. For me, between one universal ROM and hundreds of specialty ROMs, I'd choose the latter.
kurama72 said:
The 3 roms has problem with Facebook login on 3rd party programs Like IM+ , Meebo, etc, the only way for me to get facebook chat on a third party was making a meebo account and adding all my accounts into my meebo account and then loging in with my meebo account on the meebo app for android rofl. also CM7.2 BY J.A.F has problem after flashing gapps and everytime my device start it force close gmail and doesn´t connect to Google server to add my google account in the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For the gapps problem in 7.2 i think you have to reflash the rom and this time not flash the ICS theme + animation. I believe that is what causes the apps to crash.
I think we should unite efforts on this cause. Couple of weeks back, I tried to move the crowd a little by making a campaign. Then we received a notice saying that CM7 was coming to our SGA.
ALL DEVELOPERS STOPPED WORKING ON ANY CM7 PORT.
I suggested to keep up working on the roms, since we don't have the certainty that the port is coming for real, which it seems (now) really farfetched. What I'm trying to say is that maybe if kept our noses to the ground and continue developing ONE HUGE MASSIVE CM7 port, then we may finally caught up some attention.
adeklipse said:
The Official CyanogenMod for Ace would be developed by official CyanogenMod developers, AFAIK (CMIIW). It wouldn't be based on either because the CM developers would use their own source code (if I'm not mistaken, Behrad's CM7 port was taken from Galaxy Mini's CM7 port, and only recently has it been identified as device "cooper").
I agree that things might be better if all those wicked devs worked together to get one demigod ROM, but we like variety. For me, between one universal ROM and hundreds of specialty ROMs, I'd choose the latter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see, so every rom in here won't have anything to do with the official version that is if we ever get one....why then the CM7.1 Cooper is stated as UNOFFICIAL? And if it gets OFFICIAL again it won't be the real official cyanogen, is that what you're saying?
itasoulas said:
why then the CM7.1 Cooper is stated as UNOFFICIAL?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe it's UNOFFICIAL because it's not developed by CyanogenMod developers (Team Douche or related).
itasoulas said:
And if it gets OFFICIAL again it won't be the real official cyanogen, is that what you're saying?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I'm not mistaken, unofficial ports of CM are called KANGs. Behrad's CM7 port (according to that definition) is also a KANG build.
If CyanogenMod developers roll out official support for the galaxy ace (as "cooper"), then that CM7 build would be official.
*did I understand & answer your question correctly?
As always, CMIIW. I'm no expert, I'm no developer, I'm just an extremely happy user.
This might be a silly question, but what exactly are the differences between the three Jellybean ROMs I see in the dev section (Paranoid, CM10, AOKP)?
None of these seem to have any kind of "feature log" or changelog.
Anyone have any insights?
tehkingo said:
This might be a silly question, but what exactly are the differences between the three Jellybean ROMs I see in the dev section (Paranoid, CM10, AOKP)?
None of these seem to have any kind of "feature log" or changelog.
Anyone have any insights?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Paranoid Android Is Jellybean
AOKP....not going there with that one
CMX, Pure build from code. Great rom.
differences, not exactly sure, but most will have a twitter to keep up with changes if possible
leo72793 said:
Paranoid Android Is Jellybean
AOKP....not going there with that one
CMX, Pure build from code. Great rom.
differences, not exactly sure, but most will have a twitter to keep up with changes if possible
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not trying to be a ****, but you kind of didn't answer my question in any way.
a) What's wrong with AOKP?
b) I know Paranoid is JB, that's why I mentioned it. Are you saying it's stock JB? Kinda confused on the wording here.
c) Obviously, you're a fan of CM10 (aka CMX). What makes it so good compared to the other two? I see the thread for it has more posts (and thus seems to be more popular), but why?
Again, I'm not trying to be difficult. Just hoping to get an answer without having to flash 3 different ROMs.
Each ROM has different features.
CM isnt just straight AOSP
Rxpert said:
Each ROM has different features.
CM isnt just straight AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As much as I am grateful that people are paying attention to this thread and attempting to answer, this is the 2nd non-answer I've received so far.
I know each ROM has different features, that's why I made this thread.
I know CM isn't just straight AOSP.
My issue is that unlike most of the Sense ROMs, these JB ROMs have no feature list at all, and don't even cite any sort of changelog. Thus, I can't make an informed decision on which ROM to flash.
leo72793 said:
Paranoid Android Is Jellybean
AOKP....not going there with that one
CMX, Pure build from code. Great rom.
differences, not exactly sure, but most will have a twitter to keep up with changes if possible
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's like.. not even fully correct.
Please make sure you know what you're talking about before you answer questions, as not knowing the answer will only cause more confusion.
To OP,
Paranoid: Paranoid Android is an AOSP JB ROM that focuses on the fusion of phone mode and tablet mode. Typically putting a phone into tablet mode would be cool, but some features of tablet mode just don't work that well on a phone. So they've worked on making the tablet mode experience work better on a phone. You can read more about it here.
AOKP: AOKP (Android Open Kang Project) is a highly customized AOSP build that is somewhat similar to CM in that it has a lot of tweaks available to it. AOKP actually has a bit more customization than CM, allowing you to center the clock, add the day of the week to the clock, weather in your notification menu, and a few other neat tricks. You can read more about it here.
CM10: CyanogenMod is the most popular custom Android ROM around, with a very large user base. It supports many different devices. We just recently received official support, meaning we will get official releases and nightlies on a daily basis. This is a plus for CM, because we don't have official support for AOKP and Paranoid, which means we might not always get the newest updates. While it has less ability for customization than AOKP, CM is still a very solid AOSP ROM. You can read more about it here.
All three are great ROMs, and at this point they have mostly the same bugs. I would personally suggest CM10 because the development for it is a bit more active and I've noticed better battery life and less buggyness while running that over AOKP.
SoraX64 said:
That's like.. not even fully correct.
Please make sure you know what you're talking about before you answer questions, as not knowing the answer will only cause more confusion.
To OP,
Paranoid: Paranoid Android is an AOSP JB ROM that focuses on the fusion of phone mode and tablet mode. Typically putting a phone into tablet mode would be cool, but some features of tablet mode just don't work that well on a phone. So they've worked on making the tablet mode experience work better on a phone. You can read more about it here.
AOKP: AOKP (Android Open Kang Project) is a highly customized AOSP build that is somewhat similar to CM in that it has a lot of tweaks available to it. AOKP actually has a bit more customization than CM, allowing you to center the clock, add the day of the week to the clock, weather in your notification menu, and a few other neat tricks. You can read more about it here.
CM10: CyanogenMod is the most popular custom Android ROM around, with a very large user base. It supports many different devices. We just recently received official support, meaning we will get official releases and nightlies on a daily basis. This is a plus for CM, because we don't have official support for AOKP and Paranoid, which means we might not always get the newest updates. While it has less ability for customization than AOKP, CM is still a very solid AOSP ROM. You can read more about it here.
All three are great ROMs, and at this point they have mostly the same bugs. I would personally suggest CM10 because the development for it is a bit more active and I've noticed better battery life and less buggyness while running that over AOKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks you so much for your in-depth answer.
I'll do some more research with the provided links, and will probably flash something tonight.
Thanks again.
tehkingo said:
Thanks you so much for your in-depth answer.
I'll do some more research with the provided links, and will probably flash something tonight.
Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. I would suggest trying them all, since there are differences between each of them.
tehkingo said:
As much as I am grateful that people are paying attention to this thread and attempting to answer, this is the 2nd non-answer I've received so far.
I know each ROM has different features, that's why I made this thread.
I know CM isn't just straight AOSP.
My issue is that unlike most of the Sense ROMs, these JB ROMs have no feature list at all, and don't even cite any sort of changelog. Thus, I can't make an informed decision on which ROM to flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was directed more twards the poster above me. My pizza got delivered in the middle of typing so I had to go let the guy in. Sorry my post was so short and abrupt.
SoraX did a great job of explaining the main goals/differences between the ROMS>
The reason there isnt a changelog is because at this point the developers are more focused on getting things working 100%. Its the nature of the beast.
Rxpert said:
It was directed more twards the poster above me. My pizza got delivered in the middle of typing so I had to go let the guy in. Sorry my post was so short and abrupt.
SoraX did a great job of explaining the main goals/differences between the ROMS>
The reason there isnt a changelog is because at this point the developers are more focused on getting things working 100%. Its the nature of the beast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, gotcha. Sorry for the attitude.
~I do sincerely apologize if i posted this in the wrong thread, kinda was torn between general and Q&A, but Q&A seemed more fit according to the forum rules.~
If you aren't already aware, there is a hybrid rom floating around varied devices. The rom isnt a hybrid between say ICS and JB, but rather a hybrid of cm10, aokp and paranoid. If you are curious about the specific details, just search XDA for PAC. Im trying to get back into porting, and maybe even back into developing roms, but i dont want to step on any developers toes, or over work myself. I think I would love to try and tackle this port and bring another JB rom option to us all, but i need to know if it is even worth my time.
My question is simple, Is the photon community interested in a PAC-Port?
Please, answer the poll, and if you have any added feedback/comments/questions, simply reply to the topic and i will be sure to read it through.
I would greatly appreciate your feedback, and with any luck, i can start working on it as soon as next week.
Thank you all in advance for your feedback/input!
Signed,
T3HG00GLEG33K
*now if i could only get up to the developers required 10 posts* :silly:
I'm interested.
We had another community project for the Photon lead by Th3Bill and Jokersax called Kitchen Sink that was based off of CM9
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1603595
What is project kitchen sink?
Its cm9, miui, cna, and aokp in one installer with all the options, tweaks, modifications, and changes you could ever want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bock Abrams said:
I'm interested.
We had another community project for the Photon lead by Th3Bill and Jokersax called Kitchen Sink that was based off of CM9
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1603595
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah yes, haha, i miss that. Here, look at this link to get a better understanding of the rom. i think you might have it a little confused. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=32482802
Pac, is one rom, built from multiple roms.
PKS was multiple roms built into one aroma installer.
hope your still interested.
The more roms the better I say.
Seems how I flip back and forth between cna aokp and paranoid I could definitely live with and love all the options in one ROM.
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
T3HG00GLEG33K said:
ah yes, haha, i miss that. Here, look at this link to get a better understanding of the rom. i think you might have it a little confused. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=32482802
Pac, is one rom, built from multiple roms.
PKS was multiple roms built into one aroma installer.
hope your still interested.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, cool. Of course I still am.
of course that is a good idea thats what i exactly need option of CNA with AOPK mixed with those of CM10 and phablet of paranoid
i even tried some porting myself
Well awesome. it seems that everyone would be interested in the rom. im getting everything together, but i probably wont have it started till next week. i wont give an eta due to my schedule(in college, working, taking care of my fiance) i might need surgery, so that could delay things as well, but im excited to tackle this project and finally contribute to the community.
On another note, if i get it up and running, i may decide to add in an extra rom for kicks. So instead of just pac, it might be pacc or pac-x. Thanks for your feedback. if you have any suggestions or added feedback, feel free to post your replys. I am following this thread, so i will be in touch.
Wish me luck!
would this be available to only unlocked phones?
briedt mass
InsanePostman said:
would this be available to only unlocked phones?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. This would require your phone to be unlocked and rooted. This is because the roms it will ne built from require an unlocked bootloader, and a lot of the features require root access. Another note to everyone; I do not use gsm, so once this rom is up and running, i may ask for help specifically for gsm debugging for those in need of gsm.
Hate to like bump the thread at all, just wanted to update on progress.
The majority of the rom is ported over. Having a few problems as far as it booting and staying booted, got a boot logo starts, and then loops, so still a WIP.
On a side note; i wont be working on this rom for a bit, My hours have been doubled at work, and i just got in a wreck today( im not at fault ), car is totaled. So
a) i need time to recuperate
b) needa figure out car situation
Sorry for the delay folks. After im feeling better ill be starting up again, and maybe putting in some more time into it.
Thank you for your patience, ive been having a lot of fun working on this rom, and so when its up, i will be maintaining it as long as possible. =)
Time for my good friend bengay. lol
happy pre-halloween!
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
My sincerest apologies everyone. If you are not aware, Th3bill has released PAC. I just wanted to thank everyone for their feedback as far as interest in me porting PAC over. I couldn't be happier that bill made the rom. I think it is best left to those with more experience and who aren't so rusty. I had a lot of fun working on my port, but due to the circumstances i was not able to finish in time. This all being said, this topic is now closed. Have fun everyone, and happy holidays.
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
Hey everyone,
the idea of this thread is to see which ROMS are people using the most. Feel free to post your opinions, always with respect to others.
Greetings.
lKBZl said:
Hey everyone,
the idea of this thread is to see which ROMS are people using the most. Feel free to post your opinions, always with respect to others.
Greetings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Surely AOKP won't be the winner by a longshot.
The list should probably be condensed a bit. Like including both paranoid android rom's into the same category, maybe merging the ones that build from the CM10.1 source into a single category.
EniGmA1987 said:
The list should probably be condensed a bit. Like including both paranoid android rom's into the same category, maybe merging the ones that build from the CM10.1 source into a single category.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the beggining I just made an option for paranoid, but then I checked both threads and there were a couple of ppl using each one, so I though, why not separate them. In order to include the changes you said, I think it must be a moderator who does that, i'm not sure but I can't find how to edit the poll (never made one...). Thanks.
I was thinking of a poll to see one option you're missing is 'Stock Rom' Would be nice to also graph users that aren't using a custom rom and are instead just using google's official one.
And there should be a 'Other - please list your rom' option as a good chunk of people won't vote without 2 options if there not applicable to them so its going to be skewed for stats without them.
I think CleanROM should be included in the poll, as it's a quite popular ROM.
brGabriel said:
I think CleanROM should be included in the poll, as it's a quite popular ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In theory it was there, i'm not sure why it isn't. Totally failed doing my first poll lol. Any clue if I can edit the poll or it must be an admin?
I use Pac on my nexus 10 and also on my sgs2, because i think PA is very useful especially on the nexus, but it´s nut enough customisation, so the mixture between PA and AOKP is great.
So i only can advise you to give PACman a try
lKBZl said:
In theory it was there, i'm not sure why it isn't. Totally failed doing my first poll lol. Any clue if I can edit the poll or it must be an admin?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Think the admins/mods need to edit the poll hopefully they will be nice enough to do so as this poll would be worthwhile for all of us here with nexus 10's
I sent a non urgent report so the mods can see it and hopefully be nice enough to update the thread.
I use AOKP with KTManta... AOKP Milestone, official download.
updated to Kaos Droid's new ROM, so far seems good
MrRobinson's AOKP PUB with KTManta kernel here.
Carbon Nightly!!
I must say, I'm pretty stoked with 2nd place so far!!
Been testing different ROMs like Roobox, Tasker, Liquidsmooth, I am using Carbon for now. I like AOKP too will try Sentinel next. So many ROMs to try too much fun.
Don't forget kaos droid... Awesome rom and the dev is very willing to add custom features
I've tried nearly everyone on the list. But I always end up going back to the AOKP PUB builds. I fluctuate between the builds by Bigxie and Mr. Robinson - depending on who has a more recent build. No other ROM I've used has all the customization options I'm looking for (including my #1 must-have Tablet UI) as well as including the increased speed and fluidness. With that said, it's great they there's so many options for the device. It's one of the reason I love Nexus devices.
I liked pacrom but had to switch back to paranoid android because ps3 controller wouldn't connect to sixaxis
*edit ps3 controller now connecting since flashing the newest pacrom.
Just got my N10 a couple of days ago and I'm looking for a ROM. Which one of the AOKP custom roms are the best?
MartiniGM said:
Just got my N10 a couple of days ago and I'm looking for a ROM. Which one of the AOKP custom roms are the best?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Start off with aokp pub build or task650 both are smooth but try them all and see which one is to your liking
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Hello,
I've been a fan of this site for a while, and I just created an account tonight.
I noticed that the ICS kernel source was released by HTC today. I am looking forward to having a nice ICS AOSP rom with working video. Thank you DEVS!
With the ICS kernel source, are we limited to ICS versions of android? Can the kernel source be modified to work with Jelly Bean? Maybe CM10.1?
From a verizon customer holding on to unlimited data,
thanks again to all of the DEVs and individuals that contribute to the Thunderbolt community.
blackshoes said:
Hello,
I've been a fan of this site for a while, and I just created an account tonight.
I noticed that the ICS kernel source was released by HTC today. I am looking forward to having a nice ICS AOSP rom with working video. Thank you DEVS!
With the ICS kernel source, are we limited to ICS versions of android? Can the kernel source be modified to work with Jelly Bean? Maybe CM10.1?
From a verizon customer holding on to unlimited data,
thanks again to all of the DEVs and individuals that contribute to the Thunderbolt community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I understand it's being worked on, maybe not actively right now but it seems to be a strong possibility.
HTC released their kernel version 3.0.16. That will out-of-the-box support Ice Cream Sandwich. Jelly Bean needs 3.0.31 (or higher). I think what the kernel developers now need to do is back port the necessary bits and pieces to HTC's version to make it compatible.
hallstevenson said:
HTC released their kernel version 3.0.16. That will out-of-the-box support Ice Cream Sandwich. Jelly Bean needs 3.0.31 (or higher). I think what the kernel developers now need to do is back port the necessary bits and pieces to HTC's version to make it compatible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already have one patched up to around 3.0.80, just gotta finish adding in the new board files, LTE drivers and defconfig.
As we all know though, older kernels can also be made to run versions they aren't intended for as well.
Also already have CM10.1 running pretty darn well...
santod040 said:
Already have one patched up to around 3.0.80, just gotta finish adding in the new board files, LTE drivers and defconfig.
As we all know though, older kernels can also be made to run versions they aren't intended for as well.
Also already have CM10.1 running pretty darn well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a tease!
Sent from my Blissful Bolt using Tapatalk 2
santod040 said:
Already have one patched up to around 3.0.80, just gotta finish adding in the new board files, LTE drivers and defconfig.
As we all know though, older kernels can also be made to run versions they aren't intended for as well.
Also already have CM10.1 running pretty darn well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is great news Santod!
santod040 said:
Already have one patched up to around 3.0.80, just gotta finish adding in the new board files, LTE drivers and defconfig.
As we all know though, older kernels can also be made to run versions they aren't intended for as well.
Also already have CM10.1 running pretty darn well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I just soiled myself. Oh the amazing things I miss while I'm at work.
santod040 said:
Already have one patched up to around 3.0.80, just gotta finish adding in the new board files, LTE drivers and defconfig.
As we all know though, older kernels can also be made to run versions they aren't intended for as well.
Also already have CM10.1 running pretty darn well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the RIL working for you?
video of cm1.1 on the tbolt
blackshoes said:
Hello,
I've been a fan of this site for a while, and I just created an account tonight.
I noticed that the ICS kernel source was released by HTC today. I am looking forward to having a nice ICS AOSP rom with working video. Thank you DEVS!
With the ICS kernel source, are we limited to ICS versions of android? Can the kernel source be modified to work with Jelly Bean? Maybe CM10.1?
From a verizon customer holding on to unlimited data,
thanks again to all of the DEVs and individuals that contribute to the Thunderbolt community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC Thunderbolt Runnig cm10.1 Video:good:
jacobmacek said:
HTC Thunderbolt Runnig cm10.1 Video:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
loving this! :good:
Cyanogenmod 10.1 official support?
I'm curious. Once the devs are able to get the kernel ready for cyanogenmod 10.1, has anyone thought about submitting that kernel to cyanogenmod for official Thunderbolt cyanogenmod builds?
From the posting linked below, cyanogenmod requires a tested kernel and a developer or group of developers that will maintain the kernel for official support. Is cyanogenmod official support a possibility with the kernel the DEVs are working on?
forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/72612-can-i-get-cyanogenmod-on-my-device/
Thanks for the info!
blackshoes said:
I'm curious. Once the devs are able to get the kernel ready for cyanogenmod 10.1, has anyone thought about submitting that kernel to cyanogenmod for official Thunderbolt cyanogenmod builds?
From the posting linked below, cyanogenmod requires a tested kernel and a developer or group of developers that will maintain the kernel for official support. Is cyanogenmod official support a possibility with the kernel the DEVs are working on?
forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/72612-can-i-get-cyanogenmod-on-my-device/
Thanks for the info!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't speak for everyone, but let's get "that" kernel worked out first.
It's now possible, but still not exactly a simple task.
Having already knocked out a custom Sense ICS kernel from the source was done without much hassle already.
And Jelly Bean has come pretty far for the Bolt already, but making a fully functional Jelly Bean kernel from HTC's ICS source may take a bit more dilligence.
So I would just say let's take it one step at a time.
Official builds would require dedication on a dev or multiple devs parts to continue updating and supporting it.
There aren't a lot of candidates left, that may still have enough personal interest in doing so when that time comes.
Basically, that's just not something that can be predicted at this point, as there are still uncertainties surrounding such a thing, from several different aspects/angles.
It would of course be great to see the old Bolt be added to the list of devices which are officially supported.
Who knows what else the future may hold for this faithful beast that keeps getting surprises, even if long overdue.
jacobmacek said:
HTC Thunderbolt Runnig cm10.1 Video:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want.
Sent from my Blissful Bolt using Tapatalk 2