Does anybody think the note will have problems with build quality? I have already pre ordered one and I am having second thoughts now. I keep feeling like that flimsy battery door will be a "squeaker". Other than this concern I am very excited to receive mine!
it will likely fall apart minutes after you receive it. i hereby offer $200 via Paypal to keep you from that tragedy.
ARTAQaf said:
it will likely fall apart minutes after you receive it. i hereby offer $200 via Paypal to keep you from that tragedy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll give $200 + shipping.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
corey_r said:
Does anybody think the note will have problems with build quality? I have already pre ordered one and I am having second thoughts now. I keep feeling like that flimsy battery door will be a "squeaker". Other than this concern I am very excited to receive mine!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think it will be an issue at all. All samsung phones as of late have the same flimsy plastic snap on back, and it's not an issue at all on my infuse. I think it's smart engineering, as somehow they keep a rock solid device while making it super thin and super light, all with plastic. I literally have to wrench on my phone to get the slightest squeak out of it.
I really dislike when every youtube review of any samsung phone complains about the battery cover, because it really isn't an issue.
Almost same like the Galaxy s2. Samsung phones dont have very good build quality
welchertc said:
I don't think it will be an issue at all. All samsung phones as of late have the same flimsy plastic snap on back, and it's not an issue at all on my infuse. I think it's smart engineering, as somehow they keep a rock solid device while making it super thin and super light, all with plastic. I literally have to wrench on my phone to get the slightest squeak out of it.
I really dislike when every youtube review of any samsung phone complains about the battery cover, because it really isn't an issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The main reason this concerns me is because I had an htc amaze and it squeaked terribly. Thanks for the reply, you seem to know your stuff.
Back cover is thin and light but does not squeal.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
dipyamanabiswas07 said:
Almost same like the Galaxy s2. Samsung phones dont have very good build quality
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow your an idiot!! Samsung has pretty much the best build quality for smartphones and TV's on the market right now. Just YouTube drop tests to see for yourself.. If Samsung is such poor quality then why does every other smartphone company buy parts from them, displays especially?? Everytime you see a phone with a Super AMOLED it was made by Samsung.
MMAHavok69 said:
Wow your an idiot!! Samsung has pretty much the best build quality for smartphones and TV's on the market right. Just YouTube drop tests to see for yourself.. If Samsung is such poor quality then why does every other smartphone company buy parts from them, displays especially. Everytime you see a phone wit a Super AMOLED it was made by Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your argument doesn't really make any sense. First off, I can't imagine what TVs have to do with this. Yes, Samsung is one of the largest display manufacturers. Yes, they manufacture panels for other smartphone vendors. Yes, they make a lot of very good TVs too. None of this is related to build quality of smartphones.
Build quality can mean a lot of things, but the way I think of it is "how durable the phone looks and feels." Success at drop tests is certainly a part of it, but imo it's a pretty small part. Some people find that the light, plastic-y feel of Samsung phones seems cheap to them, especially when compared with, say, HTC phones, which tend to use aluminum unibodies. Some people worry that the back covers are fragile because they are thin and bend easily. There are any number of other little concerns that people roll into "build quality" too; part of the reason people tend to disagree so much is that it's a very broad term that covers a lot of aspects of a phone.
I personally don't think that Samsung build quality is poor; I've had several Samsung phones and have never had issues with squeaking of with parts breaking, and I am not convinced that it is statistically more likely for a plastic Samsung phone to break than a metal HTC one, and they are definitely less prone to damage than a glass iPhone. I can understand why some people prefer a heavier, metal or glass phone, but for me, I'm happier with the way Samsung's plastic construction makes their phones thinner and lighter. There are tradeoffs associated with pretty much all design decisions, and I generally feel that Samsung has made good ones.
corey_r said:
The main reason this concerns me is because I had an htc amaze and it squeaked terribly. Thanks for the reply, you seem to know your stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the thanks, haha. I really can't be 100% positive about the note, seeing as I have not held one, but based on the recent track record of samsung, plastic phones can be just as solid as something made of metal. And the plastic definitely gives me peace of mind, as when my phone hits the ground, I know the plastic will absorb much more of the energy than metal will, making it less likely that my screen will shatter. This is most likely why samsung kicks ass in drop tests.
dipyamanabiswas07 said:
Almost same like the Galaxy s2. Samsung phones dont have very good build quality
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I respectfully disagree. Just because it isn't made of metal, doesn't mean it doesn't have good build quality. With the combination of gorilla glass and the polycarbonate that samsung uses for their phones, I would say that in my honest opinion, they make some of the best phones out there. Not to mention the beautiful samoled displays that they use; i will never own another phone without a samoled screen. Yes, an iPhone 4 has very attractive design attributes, but for a device that I am carrying day in and day out, samsung has a better design to me. When is the last time you saw somebody without a case on their iphone? I run my infuse with no case because I can, and the fit and finish is every bit as nice.
MMAHavok69 said:
Wow your an idiot!! Samsung has pretty much the best build quality for smartphones and TV's on the market right now. Just YouTube drop tests to see for yourself.. If Samsung is such poor quality then why does every other smartphone company buy parts from them, displays especially?? Everytime you see a phone with a Super AMOLED it was made by Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please be respectful, no need to put down others, that's just their opinion. I agree with your reasoning, just not your tactics. Good point with the drop tests though, I forgot how dominant samsung is in those.
The build quality of Samsung phones are far superior to any other smart phones I've used it owned. People assume that plastic is cheap. The back of the note is high grade plastic... Keeps the phone light and won't break. Also, samsungs perform wonderfully in drop tests. To me that says quality build.
Sent from my temporary HTC Inspire using xda premium
teiglin said:
Your argument doesn't really make any sense. First off, I can't imagine what TVs have to do with this. Yes, Samsung is one of the largest display manufacturers. Yes, they manufacture panels for other smartphone vendors. Yes, they make a lot of very good TVs too. None of this is related to build quality of smartphones.
Build quality can mean a lot of things, but the way I think of it is "how durable the phone looks and feels." Success at drop tests is certainly a part of it, but imo it's a pretty small part. Some people find that the light, plastic-y feel of Samsung phones seems cheap to them, especially when compared with, say, HTC phones, which tend to use aluminum unibodies. Some people worry that the back covers are fragile because they are thin and bend easily. There are any number of other little concerns that people roll into "build quality" too; part of the reason people tend to disagree so much is that it's a very broad term that covers a lot of aspects of a phone.
I personally don't think that Samsung build quality is poor; I've had several Samsung phones and have never had issues with squeaking of with parts breaking, and I am not convinced that it is statistically more likely for a plastic Samsung phone to break than a metal HTC one, and they are definitely less prone to damage than a glass iPhone. I can understand why some people prefer a heavier, metal or glass phone, but for me, I'm happier with the way Samsung's plastic construction makes their phones thinner and lighter. There are tradeoffs associated with pretty much all design decisions, and I generally feel that Samsung has made good ones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry that was a quick emotional response. I just get mad when people just assume the light plastic of Samsung is poor. I've seen a lot of iPhones and HTC's break or have the screen crack from not very high drops.
I've dropped my infuse a couple of times with just a body glove case and it still looks like new. I think the extra weight of HTC's metal body makes the screen crack easier.
I like how the back cover is so thin that some cases for the note require you to remove that thin back cover all together as the case acts like the back cover. I think it was one that has a flip cover.
if the back cover was a more solid metal, then ppl would complain the Note is too heavy.
it is plastic for obviously a good reason i'd say.
There's nothing wrong with plastic. And there's no squeaks, I own the International version.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Do you guys think that since it has a larger display it will be easier for the screen to crack in the unfortunate event of a drop? Also, will the note have gorilla glass? I have seen another thread posted about this topic but could not find any official answers. Thanks to everyone for all your opinions and info!
corey_r said:
Do you guys think that since it has a larger display it will be easier for the screen to crack in the unfortunate event of a drop? Also, will the note have gorilla glass? I have seen another thread posted about this topic but could not find any official answers. Thanks to everyone for all your opinions and info!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it has gorilla glass.
corey_r said:
Does anybody think the note will have problems with build quality? I have already pre ordered one and I am having second thoughts now. I keep feeling like that flimsy battery door will be a "squeaker". Other than this concern I am very excited to receive mine!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone isn't even out yet. Do you see anyone complaining about the international note?
jimmer411 said:
The phone isn't even out yet. Do you see anyone complaining about the international note?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only about the screen, but nothing of build quality.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Some people find that the light, plastic-y feel of Samsung phones seems cheap to them, especially when compared with, say, HTC phones, which tend to use aluminum unibodies.
^^I have always thought the Samsung phones felt fragile compaired to HTC's
Related
It is very thin...I wonder if we will have any problem with bending or cracking the screen from bending by carrying it in your pocket??
Any thoughts??
Don't think so. Maybe if you put it in your back pocket and sit on it but its still a solid piece. When you look at the Evo 4G the phone is 2 pieces and actually has a week spot but i doubt the Note 2 would just bend or crack without considerable force. Just my opinion.
I would like to believe that this is a nonissue. Have you heard any of the OG notes breaking from being bent? Every review I have seen has said that this is a sturdy device.
SFBPro said:
I would like to believe that this is a nonissue. Have you heard any of the OG notes breaking from being bent? Every review I have seen has said that this is a sturdy device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I have not heard of any notes breaking. It just felt delicate to me...I'm sure it will be just fine. Can't wait!!
I would be very careful with this. I did see a post in another thread somewhere about a broken screen.
I work with a guy that has a Casio Commando with a broken screen. So....
Take a sheet of plastic and see how easily you can bend it. Doesn't take too much flex to break thin glass.
Anyway. If I get this, I'll for sure be looking for a sturdy case for it.
K
Larry Fortune said:
No, I have not heard of any notes breaking. It just felt delicate to me...I'm sure it will be just fine. Can't wait!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People said the same thing with the S3. Most likely because of the plastic feel.
If someone puts it in their back pocket and is well a bigger person, there is a risk or if they fall hard on their backside then that could break it.
RaptorMD said:
If someone puts it in their back pocket and is well a bigger person, there is a risk or if they fall hard on their backside then that could break it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That kind of force will likely damage any device.
I know I've read/seen reports of the S3 casing having small fractures appear that don't functionally hurt the device, but just creep you out a little...so I thought I would search for reports of similar on the Note II. I can't find any even though I was under the impression the casing is similar material.
johnchad14 said:
I know I've read/seen reports of the S3 casing having small fractures appear that don't functionally hurt the device, but just creep you out a little...so I thought I would search for reports of similar on the Note II. I can't find any even though I was under the impression the casing is similar material.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, they are the same material. People have reported random scratching on the metal parts from purchase and also scratches on the lens. I have yet to see something like this for the n2 from
What you are talking about though
Larry Fortune said:
It is very thin...I wonder if we will have any problem with bending or cracking the screen from bending by carrying it in your pocket??
Any thoughts??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are worried about it there are many vendors selling aluminum case backs in many different colors which would certainly make it stronger.
beefchopper said:
If you are worried about it there are many vendors selling aluminum case backs in many different colors which would certainly make it stronger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would anyone want to compromise their radio signal and reception by adding a metal back for aesthetics?
mi7chy said:
Why would anyone want to compromise their radio signal and reception by adding a metal back for aesthetics?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't do it and certainly not for aesthetic reasons. I mentioned it for those who were concerned about whether or not the phone is sturdy enough with a plastic back. I have read comments from those who have installed these aluminum backs that they did not degrade the radio signal but those were subjective opinions I'm sure.
Larry Fortune said:
It is very thin...I wonder if we will have any problem with bending or cracking the screen from bending by carrying it in your pocket??
Any thoughts??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I watched the samsung testing facility video. They bend these devices quite a bit. It wasn't in English, but it didn't need to be. Its plastic for a reason. I've had my nexus fall 3 times while running on a treadmill. Sure the battery falls out... but not a scratch on the device and works just fine still. I had a Moto Razr Maxx HD which is, well, metal. I feel like that would crack the screen if its dropped before the nexus would.
Plastic has a lot more flex to it than glass (obviously), so any slight bends to the phone shouldn't be much of an issue.
I currently have the Galaxy Mega and absolutely love it...that being said when i saw the google play edition of the Z ultra last night I got a bit envious. has anyone come from the mega and if so what are your thoughts? i know there is little size difference but what were your impressions?
obviously, i'm fine with big phones but i'm concerned about the camera since i have an infant and taking pictures is actually important to me now.
also, i am wondering if you can use the Samsung MHL cable on the XZU as i use mhl daily. would be nice not to have to buy another cable.
I have no experience with the Mega, but your MHL cable won't work. Samsung MHL adapters are 11 pins while the rest are 5 pins. Non-Samsung adapters are very cheap though ($10 bucks)
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
I came from a Mega:
This is so much more powerful. Like, crazy powerful. It completely devastates the Mega. It's noticable the second you start using it, its just so fast and smooth.
The second big improvement is the screen. The Mega has an awesome screen for 720p, but the panel in the Ultra is epic.
The third big improvement is surprisingly battery life! The Ultra is considerably better.
Fourth big improvement is in signal quality. I am UK based so don't use LTE currently, but 3G the Ultra gets a stronger signal pretty much everywhere.
It's waterproof, which is never a bad thing.
Oh and I nearly forgot... Roms. There is already an excelent CM10.2 build available for the Ultra, as well as a fair few other roms and obviously the GPE just got announced and that will bring a tidal wave of very high quality roms. The Mega development section on the other hand is virtually a barren wasteland, and being both underpowered and Touchwiz inflicted it is in desperate need of a decent AOSP build. The Ultra is actually fine stock ironically, Sony only lightly skin Android and the stock rom is near-AOSP anyway.
On the downsides:
The Mega did fit in my pocket better, though I still keep my Ultra in the front pocket of my jeans just as I did with my Mega. The angular design looks good, but it is a little impractical on a device this big.
The touchscreen is prone to occasional mistouches, mainly if it's dirty. Not a big issue by any means, but a minus point non the less.
The camera is much better on the Mega, particularly in low light.
The "ASF" screen protection fitted as standard is stupid. It's plastic based, so it will scratch considerably easier than the strengthened glass beneath it and doesn't feel as nice under the finger. If you remove the film, which took me about 3 hours, the glass underneath doesn't have any oleophobic coating and so gets dirty easily. I plan on buying some of the Fusso replacement oleophobic coating on the net soon to resolve this once and for all, but that costs £20 and it shouldn't be necessary.
For me, the Ultra is the MUCH better phone. I'm really happy with mine, probably the best phone I have ever owned. :good:
i just returned my mega to buy a z ultra play edition, the mega wasn't powerful enough and didn't have enough customization options for me.
stiggy2012 said:
I came from a Mega:
This is so much more powerful. Like, crazy powerful. It completely devastates the Mega. It's noticable the second you start using it, its just so fast and smooth.
The second big improvement is the screen. The Mega has an awesome screen for 720p, but the panel in the Ultra is epic.
The third big improvement is surprisingly battery life! The Ultra is considerably better.
Fourth big improvement is in signal quality. I am UK based so don't use LTE currently, but 3G the Ultra gets a stronger signal pretty much everywhere.
It's waterproof, which is never a bad thing.
Oh and I nearly forgot... Roms. There is already an excelent CM10.2 build available for the Ultra, as well as a fair few other roms and obviously the GPE just got announced and that will bring a tidal wave of very high quality roms. The Mega development section on the other hand is virtually a barren wasteland, and being both underpowered and Touchwiz inflicted it is in desperate need of a decent AOSP build. The Ultra is actually fine stock ironically, Sony only lightly skin Android and the stock rom is near-AOSP anyway.
On the downsides:
The Mega did fit in my pocket better, though I still keep my Ultra in the front pocket of my jeans just as I did with my Mega. The angular design looks good, but it is a little impractical on a device this big.
The touchscreen is prone to occasional mistouches, mainly if it's dirty. Not a big issue by any means, but a minus point non the less.
The camera is much better on the Mega, particularly in low light.
The "ASF" screen protection fitted as standard is stupid. It's plastic based, so it will scratch considerably easier than the strengthened glass beneath it and doesn't feel as nice under the finger. If you remove the film, which took me about 3 hours, the glass underneath doesn't have any oleophobic coating and so gets dirty easily. I plan on buying some of the Fusso replacement oleophobic coating on the net soon to resolve this once and for all, but that costs £20 and it shouldn't be necessary.
For me, the Ultra is the MUCH better phone. I'm really happy with mine, probably the best phone I have ever owned. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the help.
some of the things that make me weary of the XZU - i think the sharp pretty much sucks and prefer the rounded corners. i'm not sure if it being a bit bigger will be much of a problem or not. i went to the store to try to find one and its not in stock anywhere yet.
i really want a stock android experience though and i'll never ever get that on the Mega since they'll never get MHL to work and i use mhl daily with my appradio 2 and must have it.
that google play edition is so so tempting...i better not even mention i bought another phone after just getting the mega 6 weeks ago.
is it at all easier to use being so much thinner? i didn't think that would matter though in ease of use but not sure.
It's actually ridiculously thin. I have a hard time picking it up from the table. It's almost like trying to pick something flat off the ground and you can't really get a grip. It would've been brutal for the pockets if it was thicker.
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
LordManhattan said:
It's actually ridiculously thin. I have a hard time picking it up from the table. It's almost like trying to pick something flat off the ground and you can't really get a grip. It would've been brutal for the pockets if it was thicker.
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you use a case with it?
i am also confused about this screen protector? is it a protector just built onto the phone that most people don't like or remove but its really hard to take off? i haven't seen any reviews mentioning it.
I'm not using a case. I like to use my devices naked. The screen protector is an "Anti shatter film" that's preventing glass from shattering once you break it. You may remove it if you want to, but I've heard that it takes like three hours to do it since it's really thin and it breaks into tiny pieces. It's not a good protector, so the oleophobic layer (anti smudge) layer will start to come of after some use. Also, since it's a plastic sheet, using pens on it to take notes or draw isn't recommended since it will naturally scratch it. Sony sure employed a brainiac to do this job, and I can't understand why they would do this.
Either way, that's just how it is. You won't notice or even see the protector, and if you get scratches, you can remove it and use your own protector. It just takes a lot of time. You can read all about it in a thread that's lying around here some place.
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
knives of ice said:
do you use a case with it?
i am also confused about this screen protector? is it a protector just built onto the phone that most people don't like or remove but its really hard to take off? i haven't seen any reviews mentioning it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using a black TPU case I got off ebay for £3, it doesn't add hadly any bulk but ofers decent protection.
I bought the Mega for the mrs. She wanted a large screen but doesn't need all the bells and whistles and see loves it and is used to TW having come from a note 2.
Honestly I like both devices, but for a hardcore tinkerer like me I had to have the Ultra.
baileyjr said:
I'm using a black TPU case I got off ebay for £3, it doesn't add hadly any bulk but ofers decent protection.
I bought the Mega for the mrs. She wanted a large screen but doesn't need all the bells and whistles and see loves it and is used to TW having come from a note 2.
Honestly I like both devices, but for a hardcore tinkerer like me I had to have the Ultra.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, i just wish there was somewhere i could go check out the device before buying it.
the biggest thing i think i will hate is that screen protector on the phone. that seems like the dumbest decision ever to put that on out of the factory.
there is a sony outlet store about 40min from me i wonder if they would have one, surely they would
knives of ice said:
yes, i just wish there was somewhere i could go check out the device before buying it.
the biggest thing i think i will hate is that screen protector on the phone. that seems like the dumbest decision ever to put that on out of the factory.
there is a sony outlet store about 40min from me i wonder if they would have one, surely they would
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give them a call and ask if they have it before you go out the door
knives of ice said:
yes, i just wish there was somewhere i could go check out the device before buying it.
the biggest thing i think i will hate is that screen protector on the phone. that seems like the dumbest decision ever to put that on out of the factory.
there is a sony outlet store about 40min from me i wonder if they would have one, surely they would
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't see the factory fitted screen protector. I have a normal screen protector on top as well and its invisable if you take your time to install it carefully :thumbup:
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk 4
Yeah, you won't notice it at all unless you get some bad scratches. Just treat it as a gadget, and not a piece of meat, and you probably won't get any.
If you have an infant and pictures are key for you then avoid this phone like the plague. I have young kids also and this camera sucks. However otherwise the phone is very good in every other aspect.
knives of ice said:
I currently have the Galaxy Mega and absolutely love it...that being said when i saw the google play edition of the Z ultra last night I got a bit envious. has anyone come from the mega and if so what are your thoughts? i know there is little size difference but what were your impressions?
obviously, i'm fine with big phones but i'm concerned about the camera since i have an infant and taking pictures is actually important to me now.
also, i am wondering if you can use the Samsung MHL cable on the XZU as i use mhl daily. would be nice not to have to buy another cable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont like Samsung products, bcuz they all look like sanitary napkins.
I'm waiting for my ZU to come in the mail I'm so excited coming from a Mega 6.3!
After playing with a friends ZU, the thing that I will appreciate most on the ZU is the faster processor and larger RAM, although I must admit I do wish the camera on it was a bit better with flash!! I'm a girl and I like to take selfies geez... :silly:
LordManhattan said:
I'm not using a case. I like to use my devices naked. The screen protector is an "Anti shatter film" that's preventing glass from shattering once you break it. You may remove it if you want to, but I've heard that it takes like three hours to do it since it's really thin and it breaks into tiny pieces. It's not a good protector, so the oleophobic layer (anti smudge) layer will start to come of after some use. Also, since it's a plastic sheet, using pens on it to take notes or draw isn't recommended since it will naturally scratch it. Sony sure employed a brainiac to do this job, and I can't understand why they would do this.
Either way, that's just how it is. You won't notice or even see the protector, and if you get scratches, you can remove it and use your own protector. It just takes a lot of time. You can read all about it in a thread that's lying around here some place.
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I owned the original Xperia Z and loved the mobile. Reviewers all gave it some negative feedback as when they sat in the kitchen they could not see the screen from the living room due to what they called "Poor viewing angles". I found this odd and got into all sorts of trouble on one review site, Trusted reviews, where they are anything but' trusted'.
I digress. The Z came with this new 'anti shatter film' Point is within only a few days of very respectful use I could actually see tiny marks on this laminate membrane. I spoke with the Sony importer here who advised me to fit a screen protector, in some countries they where sold with the screen protectors in the box. At that time this confused me as I thought both one and the other where the same thing? Not the case at all.
The anti shatter film is fitted as when the water resistant idea was in development the designers realised that customers would use them by a pool or near water like a beach. This caused some concern as if the phone got wet it became slippery and if dropped the screen could shatter and leave shards of glass all over the place where people could cut themselves (not to mention the cost of emptying and refilling a pool). To prevent any such problem and, I guess, avoid legal action? Sony fitted the new range of water resistant devices with these anti shatter films. Great idea.............
IN PRACTCE they have proved so soft they scratch far to readily and in terms of the Ultra it would be suicide to use a pencil on that anti shatter film.
here again is Sony being innovators of great new developments yet so often dropping the ball at the last hurdle!
I have a very decent screen protector fitted on my Ultra that I always order the same time I purchase any phone, phablet or tablet. I also always purchase a decent cover to further protect the device. I would like to use them without a cover but just cannot bare to think of scratching my devices. So good looking yet the cases do hide their good looks also add greatly to the bulk.
Life is all about compromise though.
I suggest comparing the Samsung mega against the Ultra is an unfair test to start with. Size being the only common denominator. With the exception of the camera, so I am told, the Ultra is made to a higher standard in terms of materials used in construction also the other operational hardware is more advanced. I am a Samsung fan but have never been a fan boy of any brand. Its a question of purchase what satisfies ones needs and requirements. I also own the SG Note 3 and gear, they are both now boxed and in a draw ready to sell.
Ryland
Rate this thread to express how you think the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge feels in terms of quality. A higher rating indicates that it feels premium and high-quality (attention to detail is high, manufacturing defects don't exist, etc).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I like the overall feel of the device, the housing is solid and slim; biggest gripe is that my gorilla glass 4 has a cut on the screen after 1 day of use. Not sure how this happened but almost certain it shouldn't have occured.
chavist said:
I like the overall feel of the device, the housing is solid and slim; biggest gripe is that my gorilla glass 4 has a cut on the screen after 1 day of use. Not sure how this happened but almost certain it shouldn't have occured.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've heard that GG4 was made to be more shatter resistant at the expense of hardness not sure how true this isbthough. But you're not the only one who got scratches on their s7. Some reviewers also say they had gotten scratches with the s7 during normal use while having none on their other devices.
Definitely the most expensive feeling phone that I've ever owned. It is also the most delicate and fragile feeling one.
Pop / Crack sound on the back glass
It seem my unit has a problem on the back glass next to the camera. There is a gap between the glass and the frame and if you press it there it makes a loud pop sound, making it feel pretty low quality. Also the edges make it quite difficult to use the phone lying down, holding it above your head. In general almost all of the front side has some touch sensitive areas, so the phone is quite difficult to pick up without pressing something (with an open app for example).
squallz506 said:
Definitely the most expensive feeling phone that I've ever owned. It is also the most delicate and fragile feeling one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to be joking. The S6 had a prem feel. the S7 feels cheap and the design is lacking!
cpugeeker said:
You have to be joking. The S6 had a prem feel. the S7 feels cheap and the design is lacking!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you're joking right. Design is almost identical to s6 same design with some refinements. They use the same material being glass and metal, so how you're saying s6 feels premium and the s7 doesn't makes 0% sense.
cpugeeker said:
You have to be joking. The S6 had a prem feel. the S7 feels cheap and the design is lacking!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't own an s6, so...
THE ROM ""
http://*******/1YJsZd
The build quality is top notch. No, no, it really is quality. It is heavy enough that it feels like an expensive device, but not heavy enough that it becomes a workout after holding it too long.
marquinhodsdm said:
The build quality is top notch. No, no, it really is quality. It is heavy enough that it feels like an expensive device, but not heavy enough that it becomes a workout after holding it too long.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 here.. more premium looking than my old s6
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Hde some issues with mine that is more down to quality controll (lots of unity that was shipped out quick to meet demands).
First one hade issues with home button.
Second one volume down did not work.
Third one very tine hairline scratch i top coner on the rear camera lens (not sure if i can this one exhanged as it's very hard to spot if you dont know it's there)
Also, plastic home button? This could as well be harden glass to minimize scratches.
But all i all the phone i well built and feels good in the hand. A screen protector and case it's still sadly needed though as we know from before that gorilla glass 4 is more drop safe than scratch safe compared to gorilla glass 3.
You can't have both scratch safe and drop safe glass yet sadly
Overall Design is good. The first thing that is UNIMPRESSIVE is the Sim Card Tray is made of plastic! Would Samsung ever come out of this plastic trend completely? I know we cannot live without plastic. still, the sim tray should have been metal. Also, it becomes sticky after holding for some time. So wipe and wipe again again to keep the look Premium.
A 5* for rest of the design.
I dislike the glass on the back of the phone it makes the phone feel fragile
Broke in 1.5 weeks, bad quality
Quality feel does not mean much if you drop the phone from your pocket and it breaks.
How does a company who supposed does drop test call a phone that breaks on first drop a premium quality phone.
If one is able to find and read the S7 Edge warranty, it does not cover "accidents, water, dirt, or any other damage". Imagine that. The "gorilla glass" and IP68 means nothing.
I'm really sorry that I want from an iPhone to a Samsung S7 edge. I had expected more for how much I paid for a "premium" phone.
tuannyc said:
Quality feel does not mean much if you drop the phone from your pocket and it breaks.
How does a company who supposed does drop test call a phone that breaks on first drop a premium quality phone.
If one is able to find and read the S7 Edge warranty, it does not cover "accidents, water, dirt, or any other damage". Imagine that. The "gorilla glass" and IP68 means nothing.
I'm really sorry that I want from an iPhone to a Samsung S7 edge. I had expected more for how much I paid for a "premium" phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't really know the details for the warranty but saying that a phone isn't premium because it may break on the first drop is like saying that a Ferrari isn't premium because it may scratch/get dents in its first accident. Just saying maybe if you own a Ferrari or an expensive phone just be a little more careful.
Coming from a Meizu MX5 this phone feels fantastic! Part of me does miss the solid feeling of aluminium and I kind of agree with alwayslearning, it does feel a little fragile. Mines in a Spigen clear case at the moment but that detracts from its style so I've got a ultimateshield on the way instead!
Certainly looks more stylish than an iPhone but perhaps not as robust?
I just received mine today... and so far i like it a lot. I personally think the quality is up there. The form factor is really good and is to me hits the magic spot between size and usability. I'm coming from a Note 5 and i really apreciate how compact this feels in the hand.
Is it perfect? No, but then nothing ever is. I am very happy with it so far. I'm ok with the glass back.. had it on the Note 5 and im really pretty careful with my tech.
Anyway, ive only been able to play with it for a couple of hours so far and i hope my opinion of it doesnt change. At this very moment I love it.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Reasonableness
wznazir said:
I don't really know the details for the warranty but saying that a phone isn't premium because it may break on the first drop is like saying that a Ferrari isn't premium because it may scratch/get dents in its first accident. Just saying maybe if you own a Ferrari or an expensive phone just be a little more careful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be clear, I was really looking forward to the S7 edge. Maybe it is just expectations for mobile phones. I'll let others wordsmith "premium". For me, premium is paid for appearance and performance. I'm expecting scratches and dents. But cracked at 2 feet?
Everyone product category has a level of expected performance, durability (and in cases of cars, Safety) for that specific category.
Using the analogy of a Ferrari is a bit of a stretch and false analogy. Nonetheless, to use your analogy, For a Ferrari, you expect power/speed, quality materials, sexy appearance, and if you hit something going 25 mph, you survive. The last part, you expect of any motor vehicle. It's a pretty low bar. If I drove it 200 mph, I would have NO expectation of surviving. There are certain things you expect from a car (let alone a premium car).
For a premium phone, you expect power/speed, quality, some sex appeal, and if you drop 2 feet, it doesn't crack. The last part, you expect of any mobile phone. It's a pretty low bar. If I dropped 20 feet, I would have no expectation of it surviving. Mobile phones are built with the expectation of a typical life of a mobile phone. Yes, that includes drops. And I'm pretty sure all mobile phone manufactures do drop test and built to it.
A friend responded that she dropped her S7 edge around 10 times with no issue. Yes, that is what I would expect! (ignore that that 10 drops in 2 weeks would be considered pretty clumsy by any standard). I don't necessary understand why others have lower expectations of a mobile phone.
Another way to think about it is to compare to how competitors treat "premium". Remember iphone 6 bend-gate? I never thought of putting a phone in my back pocket, but peoples expectation is that a phone is mobile and doesn't bend. Frankly I was surprised Apple made folks whole. The difference? A premium service for a premium product. I'm not saying Apple is perfect. IMHO, it is better than Samsung in their approach.
I just did a search on google, and discover review sites warning that the S7 edge is much easier to crack. Wish I knew that before hand. It was my mistake to assume S7 edge would be similar quality as S6 edge +. How many here have seen drop test of S6 on youtube? Amazing.
Really sad given that S7 edge has so much potential. Now, I have to look at a $800 Samsung "premium" everyday. I think others are more forgiving then me with this experience. I've not given up on Android. Just Samsung "premium".
my 2 cents.
tuannyc said:
To be clear, I was really looking forward to the S7 edge. Maybe it is just expectations for mobile phones. I'll let others wordsmith "premium". For me, premium is paid for appearance and performance. I'm expecting scratches and dents. But cracked at 2 feet?
Everyone product category has a level of expected performance, durability (and in cases of cars, Safety) for that specific category.
Using the analogy of a Ferrari is a bit of a stretch and false analogy. Nonetheless, to use your analogy, For a Ferrari, you expect power/speed, quality materials, sexy appearance, and if you hit something going 25 mph, you survive. The last part, you expect of any motor vehicle. It's a pretty low bar. If I drove it 200 mph, I would have NO expectation of surviving. There are certain things you expect from a car (let alone a premium car).
For a premium phone, you expect power/speed, quality, some sex appeal, and if you drop 2 feet, it doesn't crack. The last part, you expect of any mobile phone. It's a pretty low bar. If I dropped 20 feet, I would have no expectation of it surviving. Mobile phones are built with the expectation of a typical life of a mobile phone. Yes, that includes drops. And I'm pretty sure all mobile phone manufactures do drop test and built to it.
A friend responded that she dropped her S7 edge around 10 times with no issue. Yes, that is what I would expect! (ignore that that 10 drops in 2 weeks would be considered pretty clumsy by any standard). I don't necessary understand why others have lower expectations of a mobile phone.
Another way to think about it is to compare to how competitors treat "premium". Remember iphone 6 bend-gate? I never thought of putting a phone in my back pocket, but peoples expectation is that a phone is mobile and doesn't bend. Frankly I was surprised Apple made folks whole. The difference? A premium service for a premium product. I'm not saying Apple is perfect. IMHO, it is better than Samsung in their approach.
I just did a search on google, and discover review sites warning that the S7 edge is much easier to crack. Wish I knew that before hand. It was my mistake to assume S7 edge would be similar quality as S6 edge +. How many here have seen drop test of S6 on youtube? Amazing.
Really sad given that S7 edge has so much potential. Now, I have to look at a $800 Samsung "premium" everyday. I think others are more forgiving then me with this experience. I've not given up on Android. Just Samsung "premium".
my 2 cents.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a lot more to consider. They made millions of those phones and can't expect them to have the exact same build (while yes, they are all very close). Also, the drop has to be taken into consideration. If your friend drops hers 10 times on carpet or from like 1 feet, sure it won't get damaged. If you drop it from 2 feet on concrete, now that's a different story. The angle to which it drops and lend also makes a big difference. The device isn't it's strongest on every angle and some will definitely break it easily (take an egg for example, which is hard to break at the top and bottom but sides are flimsy).
Anyway, just this to say that while I agree it shouldn't break so easily. It can and will happen depending on quite a few facts, whether it is a "premium" device or not.
As a side note, Apple sell "premium" devices as well for the same price which also break and crack, comparing them is pointless without all the facts They'd have to be put through the exact same drop (angle, speed, material on which they drop) and even then, they'd both have angles at which they resist/survive better and worse since they're built differently.
LG G5 painted in plastic coating?
Jerry rig everything video shows alot of proof.
Most of the professional reviewers are scared to speak the truth. Why? Are you scared of LG?
It is a die-cast aluminium body which then has the antennas placed on the outside (because the signals wouldn't get through the metal) there is then a primer to help the paint bond to the aluminium and cover up the antennas. They then use a microdised finish over the top which is effectively a metallic paint.
It's not plastic it's just not been machined and anodised. They were going for a different take on the metal body that could allow them to hide the antennas.
alexp999 said:
It is a die-cast aluminium body which then has the antennas placed on the outside (because the signals wouldn't get through the metal) there is then a primer to help the paint bond to the aluminium and cover up the antennas. They then use a microdised finish over the top which is effectively a metallic paint.
It's not plastic it's just not been machined and anodised. They were going for a different take on the metal body that could allow them to hide the antennas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A diffrent take lol. That plastic coating pretty much negates the need of having metal in a phone. Just make it out plastic if ythats all ill feel when holding it !
Most concerning part is the display assembly. So thin that you can see the pressure points when you select something. Maybe i am to demanding idk, but all the different phones over the years i have never experienced such thing.
FalconFX said:
A diffrent take lol. That plastic coating pretty much negates the need of having metal in a phone. Just make it out plastic if ythats all ill feel when holding it !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You get the benefit of heat dissipation and rigidity/strength of the metal body instead of a plastic body.
alexp999 said:
You get the benefit of heat dissipation and rigidity/strength of the metal body instead of a plastic body.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im pretty sure no one complained about such thing with S5/G4 and earlier devices that used full plastic builds. You are delusional my friend, they are missleading consumers, & then coming out with some bs excuse, "we are doing it differently, we didnt want to do what everyone else is doing" !
I'm not delusional, people just seem to have got it stuck in their heads it is basically a full plastic build. There is plastic in every metal phone, just of varying degrees.
I've no issue with the way they have constructed the phone. If you don't like it then don't buy it.
alexp999 said:
I'm not delusional, people just seem to have got it stuck in their heads it is basically a full plastic build. There is plastic in every metal phone, just of varying degrees.
I've no issue with the way they have constructed the phone. If you don't like it then don't buy it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i sure as hell won't buy it, i already bought the S7Edge, and it doesnt have any plastic, at least none that makes contact with my hands !
FalconFX said:
i sure as hell won't buy it, i already bought the S7Edge, and it doesnt have any plastic, at least none that makes contact with my hands !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great
So what you doing hanging around the G5 forum then? Bye troll.
alexp999 said:
Great
So what you doing hanging around the G5 forum then? Bye troll.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i gotta see ppls experiences with the G5, its good to know how good the competition is doing this year , apparently there is none so far
I got the S7 Edge as well but was hanging around here to see if I liked the G5 as I still have one more jump until July with Tmobiles jump on demand.
Looks like I'll be waiting to see what the HTC 10 brings to the table.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
alexp999 said:
I'm not delusional, people just seem to have got it stuck in their heads it is basically a full plastic build. There is plastic in every metal phone, just of varying degrees.
I've no issue with the way they have constructed the phone. If you don't like it then don't buy it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. Peoples' ignorance is funny to read on here lol.
Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk
The truth is LG G5 is ugly phone compared to galaxy S7 edge. I even think HTC 10 will be better then LG G5.
Am sorry to say.
umbrokhan said:
The truth is LG G5 is ugly phone compared to galaxy S7 edge. I even think HTC 10 will be better then LG G5.
Am sorry to say.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
definetly, the chanfer might be too big, but still, they are fixing what was broken in previous gens, & there software is the top OEM skin out there, so yeah it will be a good competitor to the S7/Edge.
It's called paint people get over it, especially from your gs7s
trolls everywhere…
seriously… this device has not been shipped worldwide yet and people already start complaining about built quality. get a life.
i preordered my g5 including a free camera module and i'm proud of that decision so far.
all thats left is that they start shipping to germany.
I keep wanting to think that the GS7E is good lucking. Maybe it's just that I'm coming from the G3 but....it just seems too damn narrow! But to be honest, the biggest problem is that I can't play with the GS7E at any of the stores, they're all on demo mode...maybe I should go into another carrier's store where there's one I can actually demo. Can anyone tell me whether your carrier typically has its demo phones NOT on retail mode? I'm on sprint here (and still undecided between G5/GS7E/GS7).
umbrokhan said:
Ok thank you for reporting me. And thank you for calling me names and insulting me. Anything else you want to add?
Plus am not forcing you to read my comments. You choose to read them your self. So blame your self not me. You can click ignore button but still you want to read my comments.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I per-ordered the G5 and got it Friday. I have had no issues with. This whole metal vs. plastic issue is a joke. Structurally speaking, this is great phone. They had to switch to the thin metal aluminum in the back because of the void between the back and the screen when you take out the battery. And when you do take the battery out, there's very little to no deflection.
I have an metal body iphone 5s for work and i hate it. This is so much better.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1sONfxPCTU0
umbrokhan said:
Yeah am glad your happy with your new phone and you not insulting me like the other guy is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not here to insult, just to inform on my experience thus far. However, i wish you wouldn't be commenting so negatively on this phone without using it for some considerable time. A 10 minute in-store demo use of the phone shouldn't count especially when you are looking for all the negatives. When i pick up a phone in the store i look for all the negatives first before the positives.
Like I said, the look and fell of this phone is great after 4 days of use. The main selling point for me was the removable battery and the camera. The battery seems like it's very easy to swap and the camera is superb. I took it to a show on Friday and the pictures where incredible especially in wide view. I'm sure the 7s takes better pictures, but i really like the wide angle.
I personally don't care for all the friends modules they're advertising.
Had i read your comments before i purchased the phone, i probably wouldn't have bought the phone. Let me know if you have any other questions and I'll be happy to answer.
Just saw this cheeky tweet
Screen Protector in question
Ive got one on order and will happliy give a review once I've gotten my hands on it. I've used their screen protectors before on my other devices and they have protected them just fine. Can't really complain about same day dispatch either.
let the chase begin!!!
Is it just me, or does this screen protector seem to lack a proper cutout for the notification LED. It can't be, can it? Surely, Orzly's better than that?
Thanks, just bought, hopefully it'll be better than the one they had for OP3T, don't want no rainbowing and visible grid this time.
MrDeacon said:
Is it just me, or does this screen protector seem to lack a proper cutout for the notification LED. It can't be, can it? Surely, Orzly's better than that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you need a cutout for an led? It's a glass screen protector, you'll see the led just fine through it
the shipping time is far too long for US though :/
A Guy Called Revive said:
Just saw this cheeky tweet
Screen Protector in question
Ive got one on order and will happliy give a review once I've gotten my hands on it. I've used their screen protectors before on my other devices and they have protected them just fine. Can't really complain about same day dispatch either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great news! Loved it on my OnePlus 3! Looking forward to mine arriving now, will finally feel safe haha.
djsubterrain said:
Why would you need a cutout for an led? It's a glass screen protector, you'll see the led just fine through it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it has a black frame, which isn't see-through? Why would you think the sensors and the camera have cutouts if the protector was transparent?
As suspected, the advertising pictures are incorrect. The actual screen protector has proper cutouts for the notification LED.
Its_Tim said:
the shipping time is far too long for US though :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They usually have Amazon prime stock fairly fast so maybe give it a week and you'll probably be able to order for next day. If you can wait a week...
---------- Post added at 04:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 PM ----------
I had their TGSP for my OP2 and loved it!! Though noticed these are not completely transparent so just been reading more about it on their blog and i guess it has to do with a curved screen? Don't get what is so great about curved screens.... I've loved my OP2 for a few years now and holding the OP5 in my hand today I really don't sit there saying Oh my god how did I used to live without curved screens!! I still do say that about touch screens (versus those piddly little screens we used to have on clamshell phones )
jason-tech-uk said:
They usually have Amazon prime stock fairly fast so maybe give it a week and you'll probably be able to order for next day. If you can wait a week...
---------- Post added at 04:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 PM ----------
I had their TGSP for my OP2 and loved it!! Though noticed these are not completely transparent so just been reading more about it on their blog and i guess it has to do with a curved screen? Don't get what is so great about curved screens.... I've loved my OP2 for a few years now and holding the OP5 in my hand today I really don't sit there saying Oh my god how did I used to live without curved screens!! I still do say that about touch screens (versus those piddly little screens we used to have on clamshell phones )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't agree with you more! I feel the same about OLED TVs to be honest. (it's just one of those things that manufacturers like to do so that they can try to pretend like they've invented something useful, but of very little use other than that old ones didn't do that. Flat screens for phones though are definitely much more practical in the context of glass screens though. That said, whilst I still prefer the flat ones hands down, I think Orzly made a much better job of the curved ones than any of the others I've seen (the actual TG Screen Protector that OnePlus themselves made was astonishingly terrible according to all the videos I've seen)
AnabolicAndroidz said:
Couldn't agree with you more! I feel the same about OLED TVs to be honest. (it's just one of those things that manufacturers like to do so that they can try to pretend like they've invented something useful, but of very little use other than that old ones didn't do that. Flat screens for phones though are definitely much more practical in the context of glass screens though. That said, whilst I still prefer the flat ones hands down, I think Orzly made a much better job of the curved ones than any of the others I've seen (the actual TG Screen Protector that OnePlus themselves made was astonishingly terrible according to all the videos I've seen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meh I agree. OLED TVs really aren't necessary, I see the difference on LED/IPS phones and OLED phones but don't see much of a difference in the OLED TVs.
Yep I agree on your second point too. Had the Orzly TGSP for my op3 and it fitted great, much better then the likes of casebase etc. After watching the video @niijonodhg made, I'm excited to get this flimsy plastic protector off and get the TGSP one on!
AnabolicAndroidz said:
Couldn't agree with you more! I feel the same about OLED TVs to be honest. (it's just one of those things that manufacturers like to do so that they can try to pretend like they've invented something useful, but of very little use other than that old ones didn't do that. Flat screens for phones though are definitely much more practical in the context of glass screens though. That said, whilst I still prefer the flat ones hands down, I think Orzly made a much better job of the curved ones than any of the others I've seen (the actual TG Screen Protector that OnePlus themselves made was astonishingly terrible according to all the videos I've seen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pet hate in terms of unnecessary 'value-less' over hyped marketing features is with food though. Off topic I know but you've now set me off thinking of stupid marketing ploys. So this month's 'super food' is cauliflower - you know cauliflower rice, cauliflower pizza bases from trader Joe's, cauliflower flour. I mean come on!!! Cauliflower has existed for a long time now, why blitz it and call it rice and try and fool foolish people in to paying over the odds for 'rice' - oh wait I think I answered my own question
Anyway hopefully like with most fads, this one will pass and soon we will have a 2020 nostalgic or retro version of the Oneplus 2 (like the Nokia 3310)
jason-tech-uk said:
They usually have Amazon prime stock fairly fast so maybe give it a week and you'll probably be able to order for next day. If you can wait a week...
---------- Post added at 04:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 PM ----------
I had their TGSP for my OP2 and loved it!! Though noticed these are not completely transparent so just been reading more about it on their blog and i guess it has to do with a curved screen? Don't get what is so great about curved screens.... I've loved my OP2 for a few years now and holding the OP5 in my hand today I really don't sit there saying Oh my god how did I used to live without curved screens!! I still do say that about touch screens (versus those piddly little screens we used to have on clamshell phones )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DarkExistence said:
Meh I agree. OLED TVs really aren't necessary, I see the difference on LED/IPS phones and OLED phones but don't see much of a difference in the OLED TVs.
Yep I agree on your second point too. Had the Orzly TGSP for my op3 and it fitted great, much better then the likes of casebase etc. After watching the video niijonodhg made, I'm excited to get this flimsy plastic protector off and get the TGSP one on!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the tempered glass versions are definitely the way to go. I personally have never seen the point in the other plastic foil types of protectors. (all they really do is just stop fingermarks and light scratches at best, but even those things they generally tend not to do so well, so for me personally it has never really warranted putting that type of extra covering on, as all that does is just cheapens the look. (and for very little benefit). But the tempered glass ones I absolutely swear by, as they psychically stop your phone's actual screen from getting smashed in, so that's the entire point for me.
( I learnt my lesson the hard way a few years back after accidentally dropping my phone face down and regretted it, so have been using the tempered glass types ever since) .
Thanks for the heads up on the casebase ones though, as some are definitely better than others. (even ones that look similar, I have found) - There can often be huge differences in glues, thicknesses, screen sensitivity, etc. My experience of the Orzly ones has been the same as yours, and I do generally tend to find them to be the best of all the ones I have used so far. I've had them before for a few different of phones in the past, and the one they did for the Nintendo Switch was exceptionally good! (even better than some of the ones I've had for my phones) so they can vary from model to model aswell, but generally they always seem to hold up well!
AnabolicAndroidz said:
Yeah, the tempered glass versions are definitely the way to go. I personally have never seen the point in the other plastic foil types of protectors. (all they really do is just stop fingermarks and light scratches at best, but even those things they generally tend not to do so well, so for me personally it has never really warranted putting that type of extra covering on, as all that does is just cheapens the look. (and for very little benefit). But the tempered glass ones I absolutely swear by, as they psychically stop your phone's actual screen from getting smashed in, so that's the entire point for me.
( I learnt my lesson the hard way a few years back after accidentally dropping my phone face down and regretted it, so have been using the tempered glass types ever since) .
Thanks for the heads up on the casebase ones though, as some are definitely better than others. (even ones that look similar, I have found) - There can often be huge differences in glues, thicknesses, screen sensitivity, etc. My experience of the Orzly ones has been the same as yours, and I do generally tend to find them to be the best of all the ones I have used so far. I've had them before for a few different of phones in the past, and the one they did for the Nintendo Switch was exceptionally good! (even better than some of the ones I've had for my phones) so they can vary from model to model aswell, but generally they always seem to hold up well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep definitely agree on the film protectors. The one that OP ships on the phone seems to be a dust magnet too, gets stuck to the screen. Kind of annoying haha.
Glad you have the same opinion on Orzly! Look at that we both had great experiences with then for the switch too!
AnabolicAndroidz said:
Yeah, the tempered glass versions are definitely the way to go. I personally have never seen the point in the other plastic foil types of protectors. (all they really do is just stop fingermarks and light scratches at best, but even those things they generally tend not to do so well, so for me personally it has never really warranted putting that type of extra covering on, as all that does is just cheapens the look. (and for very little benefit). But the tempered glass ones I absolutely swear by, as they psychically stop your phone's actual screen from getting smashed in, so that's the entire point for me.
( I learnt my lesson the hard way a few years back after accidentally dropping my phone face down and regretted it, so have been using the tempered glass types ever since) .
Thanks for the heads up on the casebase ones though, as some are definitely better than others. (even ones that look similar, I have found) - There can often be huge differences in glues, thicknesses, screen sensitivity, etc. My experience of the Orzly ones has been the same as yours, and I do generally tend to find them to be the best of all the ones I have used so far. I've had them before for a few different of phones in the past, and the one they did for the Nintendo Switch was exceptionally good! (even better than some of the ones I've had for my phones) so they can vary from model to model aswell, but generally they always seem to hold up well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't comment on the Switch as my wife is yet to buy me one (read neglected husband ) but I suppose it was an easier device as it has a flat screen rather than these fuddy duddy new age curved nonsense.
Ive had a dispatch notification for my Orzly screen so should know next week...
DarkExistence said:
Yep definitely agree on the film protectors. The one that OP ships on the phone seems to be a dust magnet too, gets stuck to the screen. Kind of annoying haha.
Glad you have the same opinion on Orzly! Look at that we both had great experiences with then for the switch too!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, Small world! Yeah, absolutely loving my Switch so far, but wouldn't have dared taking anywhere without the tempered glass on it! To be honest I had thought about keeping my phone in the top pocket of the Nintendo Switch Travel Case I got from them, as it would certainly fit. (But to be honest I probably wouldn't hear the phonecalls if I did it that way, so I'll save the top pocket for the extra joy-cons and cables that I carry). For my OnePlus 5, I prefer to keep it close enough to my body so that I can physically feel aswell as hear when someone tries to call me on it.
---------- Post added at 11:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:10 AM ----------
jason-tech-uk said:
My pet hate in terms of unnecessary 'value-less' over hyped marketing features is with food though. Off topic I know but you've now set me off thinking of stupid marketing ploys. So this month's 'super food' is cauliflower - you know cauliflower rice, cauliflower pizza bases from trader Joe's, cauliflower flour. I mean come on!!! Cauliflower has existed for a long time now, why blitz it and call it rice and try and fool foolish people in to paying over the odds for 'rice' - oh wait I think I answered my own question
Anyway hopefully like with most fads, this one will pass and soon we will have a 2020 nostalgic or retro version of the OnePlus 2 (like the Nokia 3310)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, yeah, Even retro in itself for me I find to be a rather annoying fad. (don't get me wrong, I love it when companies return back to things that work better than some of the pointless gimmicks they tried on but were never useful, but alot of times it's not even that) I think we have truly reached the age though where companies are starting to seriously run out of ideas. I think the last innovative thing I ever saw on a phone was a few years back when Apple first brought out Touch ID. (couldn't live without that now, so I genuinely do find that useful). But now fortunately this feature is standard on alot of phones now, but I haven't seen anything innovative from anyone for a long time. Apple and OnePlus are still my two favorites by far (I like to have both iOS and Android for different things). For Apple though I think the 5S to 6S Plus era are my favorite types, and don't like where they went from 7 onwards which is why I'm buying the OnePlus 5 for my android replacement this year, and just sticking with my existing 6S Plus for my Apple unless I hear anything that impresses me enough about iPhone 8 to warrant making the upgrade. (could happen, but not heard even so much as a rumor that has pricked my ears up so far). I do sincerely hope though that they surprise me and prove me wrong.
jason-tech-uk said:
Can't comment on the Switch as my wife is yet to buy me one (read neglected husband ) but I suppose it was an easier device as it has a flat screen rather than these fuddy duddy new age curved nonsense.
I've had a dispatch notification for my Orzly screen so should know next week...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I can confirm that the screen of the Nintendo Switch is completely flat, and that really does make a huge difference. to the type of screen protector you can put on it. (Definitely the flat screen devices are superior in that respect). The curved screen devices really make it alot more complicated to actually protect them, so I do sincerely hope this fad of curved scenes dies a horrible death soon, as they definitely seem to create more problems than they solve. I personally see no befit to curving them whatsoever, and seems to infuriate users who eventually regret buying devices they otherwise really like, after having such an annoying experience with them. (if it's any consolation, it has backfired on the manufacturers too if you think about it (as if they had a flat screen to begin with, their own screen protectors would have worked alot better with their devices, and they wouldn't have had to worry about so many 3rd party accessory manufacturers from stealing their thunder, nor the problem of customers who had gotten frustrated with the experience opting to not put themselves through that whole ordeal the next time round). Until they learn this, it is a problem they will forever be vulnerable to.
But in OnePlus's defense, they do tend to learn from their mistakes alot more than many other phone makers. But if I was in their shoes, I would certainly be making doubly sure to pay attention to this particular issue, as this happening twice in a row now on their last two devices certainly isn't doing them any favors (even amongst those of us who generally otherwise love them, but are starting to get fatigued enough by it to think twice next time). If we are vocal about this often enough though as loyal customers who understand how important this is, if any company can learn from it, I believe OnePlus can.