Interest in a secure/private ROM? - Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime

I am considering creating a secure ROM which will be optimized for security and privacy. Gapps will be removed, security will be enhanced, Tor integration, a custom kernel enhanced for security and speed, and open source drivers (The last two are for later work).
I am considering making two flavors, a defense ROM (Set up for defense and max privacy), and a Offensive ROM (The defensive ROM except modded for pentesting (Right...? ). I might figure out how to get the aircrack suite running on it.)
However, the Offensive ROM is a future project and i am just going to make the defense ROM for now.
Is there any interest into this? (And i might integrate cornerstone into it)
I plan to make it a FOS ROM for v2 or v3 but thats all in the future. For now i am planning to build off of the stock ROM.
Any idea's/suggestions?
Edit: I have started working on the Defense version and I should have a 1.0 out soon.

And yes, I have the computing power to compile a FOS ROM. Two quad Core 8gb machines

An SELinux version of Android already exists... and Android is already inherently secure because of app-sandboxes... what on earth could you possibly offer better than that? If you want a secure android, don't root it.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA

damien667 said:
An SELinux version of Android already exists... and Android is already inherently secure because of app-sandboxes... what on earth could you possibly offer better than that? If you want a secure android, don't root it.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean secure as in no Google logging (remember carrier IQ oh wise one? ), custom written drivers so no manufacturer logging , and a custom kernel so that I can do things like disable the GPS chip at kernel level and lock the camera at kernel level.
And the offensive ROM is going to be a blast. All ur wifis ar mine and all that

All of that sounds pretty awesome, even if I didn't use it choice is the reason we all go android right?
sent from my Transformer Prime

marko! said:
All of that sounds pretty awesome, even if I didn't use it choice is the reason we all go android right?
sent from my Transformer Prime
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly!
Sent from my TFP

Why go thru all that troubles, why dont you just turn off the internet? or dont use your tablet at all?

Please do this! We have mobile labs with Transformer Prime's and this will be perfect for testing and IT!

justwonder said:
Why go thru all that troubles, why dont you just turn off the internet? or dont use your tablet at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not going through *that* much trouble. V1 is just a modded stock ROM.
And why would I pay $500 for something I don't use?

detta123 said:
Please do this! We have mobile labs with Transformer Prime's and this will be perfect for testing and IT!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The defense or the offence one?

i500 said:
The defense or the offence one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Defense. 10char

I'm interested in the offensive one but not so much defensive one. All options are great though!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk

SOTK said:
I'm interested in the offensive one but not so much defensive one. All options are great though!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The offense one is going to be built off of the Defense ROM so i have to make sure the Defense ROM is stable before building the Offense ROM. No use putting the cart before the horse .

Ha I'd love this! Just took a break from my computer forensics lab to find this here waiting.
---------- Post added at 06:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------
tor integration would be a nice feature, but so would having an option to cut it off if it gets too slow.
Better vpn implementation would be a plus.

ickkii said:
Ha I'd love this! Just took a break from my computer forensics lab to find this here waiting.
---------- Post added at 06:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------
tor integration would be a nice feature, but so would having an option to cut it off if it gets too slow.
Better vpn implementation would be a plus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was planning on doing both of those.
Hopefully i can have a alpha build out tomorrow.

I am all for the defensive ROM, in fact as long as cornerstone is integrated into any ROM, i will be absolutely elated to try it.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda premium

avinash60 said:
I am all for the defensive ROM, in fact as long as cornerstone is integrated into any ROM, i will be absolutely elated to try it.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cornerstone will be integrated into a separate build as it is quite buggy from what i have heard.

justwonder said:
Why go thru all that troubles, why dont you just turn off the internet? or dont use your tablet at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even know what TOR is?
And the things you use a tablet for (Pr0n?) are not the things the OP is making a very specific build for.
I actually have quite a few professional tools on my Prime as well, and it wouldn't break my heart to see GAPPS go away.
I really hate it when amateurs with no clue post "rhetorical" questions. Rhetorical in quotes because you obviously have no clue that there IS a valid answer to your question, nor are you even remotely interested in the answer because the OP already gave it PRIOR to you asking.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

defense/offense in 1?

So if this Eee Pad is like its netbook brother the Eee PC which has a broadcom also(yes I know its not the exact same one) it could be pretty useful in the penetrate(offensive) area. My college runs the Eee PC in the ethical hacking classes because its compact and the broadcom it boasts can utilize BT WiFI tools to its full potential.

Related

[BOUNTY] i717 Galaxy Note AOSP [no further pledges]

THIS IS A BOUNTY THREAD.
WHICH HAS BEEN CLOSED DUE TO FLAMING/TROLLING/ SARCASM/ ETC. AND POSSIBILITY OF ATTRACTING FLAMERS (those who flame) TROLLERS, AND OTHERS. (not you, dagr8)
this is not pointed at anyone.
Do you still feel the need for an aosp bounty? Make a thread, and let the trolling begin.
To whomever delivers a fully working aosp build first will receive $20 from me. I know it is not nearly enough but I still want to repay the developer for his/her work.
Reserved
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
$30
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium
What's the difference from this and Dagr8 new update. Change density goes to phone or tablet depending on what u set u r density.
Sent from the TermiNOTEr!
When you say fully functional does that mean spen too? That may add considerable effort. I personally would be OK if everything worked except spen. Of course working spen would be a nice bonus.
---------- Post added at 10:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:25 PM ----------
borijess said:
What's the difference from this and Dagr8 new update. Change density goes to phone or tablet depending on what u set u r density.
Sent from the TermiNOTEr!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His mod is touchwiz, this is for AOSP.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I gathered from DAGr8's response to me in the other bounty that AOSP brings Tablet/Phone hybrid functionality. So this is really a bounty for a pure AOSP ROM and nothing specific about Tablet/Phone since that's inherent to AOSP. No?
Also, I thought a lot of the S-Pen functionality was tied to TW, so unless we specify something for S-Pen, that's not a requirement for this bounty.
jpg71 said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I gathered from DAGr8's response to me in the other bounty that AOSP brings Tablet/Phone hybrid functionality. So this is really a bounty for a pure AOSP ROM and nothing specific about Tablet/Phone since that's inherent to AOSP. No?
Also, I thought a lot of the S-Pen functionality was tied to TW, so unless we specify something for S-Pen, that's not a requirement for this bounty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True on both accounts. What may happen is someone can pledge for aosp a certain amount then a higher amount from aosp + spen.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
My pledge is $100
1. Fully functional (phone, gps, s pen etc...)
2. Must be 100% compatible with i717M (Canada Bell)
3. Pure Android NO TW or any other
4. Must have NFC
5. Zero bloatware
6. Perma-Rooted
EDIT: Fully functional means everything (i.e. no FCs), for ICS, all s-pen apps must work
EvoXOhio said:
When you say fully functional does that mean spen too? That may add considerable effort. I personally would be OK if everything worked except spen. Of course working spen would be a nice bonus.
---------- Post added at 10:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:25 PM ----------
His mod is touchwiz, this is for AOSP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The spen would work, however The button would not. I think that The wacom digitizer works without tw on vanilla roms but the button and therefore gestures requiring the button would become useless.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
JohnnyQ1964 said:
My pledge is $100
1. Fully functional (phone, gps, s pen etc...)
2. Must be 100% compatible with i717M (Canada Bell)
3. Pure Android NO TW or any other
4. Must have NFC
5. Zero bloatware
6. Perma-Rooted
EDIT: Fully functional means everything (i.e. no FCs), for ICS, all s-pen apps must work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just so you know SPen support with Aosp is extremely unlikely. Glad to see the high bouty though.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
coming from a pure aosp device, just wondering what you guys are hoping to get out of this?
we already have aosp launcher and aosp apps working or being worked on
you certaintly wont get spen support and if you did it would be a while after launch of pure aosp indefinitely. So I just fail to see how any devs would be motivated by this..
I guess it's good to dream put me in for 100$ but only if it comes with spen support at launch, k?
Does anyone want to go in with me on a bounty for jelly bean???
I pledge 2 boxes of cookies your choice. I find cookies are more of a motivator than monies.
*edit* Will not ship to Canada.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
sam.jh said:
coming from a pure aosp device, just wondering what you guys are hoping to get out of this?
we already have aosp launcher and aosp apps working or being worked on
you certaintly wont get spen support and if you did it would be a while after launch of pure aosp indefinitely. So I just fail to see how any devs would be motivated by this..
I guess it's good to dream put me in for 100$ but only if it comes with spen support at launch, k?
Does anyone want to go in with me on a bounty for jelly bean???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. That's very generous.
Carnifex3 said:
I pledge 2 boxes of cookies your choice. I find cookies are more of a motivator than monies.
*edit* Will not ship to Canada.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Care to specify an amount per box? Now it is a bit misleading...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
sam.jh said:
coming from a pure aosp device, just wondering what you guys are hoping to get out of this?
we already have aosp launcher and aosp apps working or being worked on
you certaintly wont get spen support and if you did it would be a while after launch of pure aosp indefinitely. So I just fail to see how any devs would be motivated by this..
I guess it's good to dream put me in for 100$ but only if it comes with spen support at launch, k?
Does anyone want to go in with me on a bounty for jelly bean???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP is faster and lighter than Touchwiz. Tablet mode is built-in and less of a hack.
In for $20
Sent from my SAMSUNG Galaxy Note using XDA Premium HD app
Carnifex3 said:
*edit* Will not ship to Canada.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't mean to convert my previous post from partial ass to complete ass now that it was taken seriously; however, after seeing an extra 100$ added to the bounty it seems my intention at sarcasm wasn't understandable by the OP. I have no intentions of paying 100$ for aosp with spen support at launch, nor' do I have any intention of starting a bounty for Jelly Bean. Not because I don't want them, just because I don't think it is possible. To follow up on what I was trying to say in my last post -- now that we have almost all of the aosp apps available to us, aosp launchers and tablet mode, I see no advantage to what an aosp base could bring us. Perhaps delusions of higher benchmark scores? Anyways sign me off please, I am not a supporter.
I take a long view on my commitment on my pledge.
If Samsung comes out with their ICS, I get what I want for free... But we lose the skill set if someone developed it here and we will need someone to learn it when Jelly Bean comes out. I love Samsung hardware but hate their lack of commitment to their Android releases.
Edit: spelling error... Also hate auto correct
Sent from my SGH-I717M using Tapatalk 2
sam.jh said:
I don't mean to convert my previous post from partial ass to complete ass now that it was taken seriously; however, after seeing an extra 100$ added to the bounty it seems my intention at sarcasm wasn't understandable by the OP. I have no intentions of paying 100$ for aosp with spen support at launch, nor' do I have any intention of starting a bounty for Jelly Bean. Not because I don't want them, just because I don't think it is possible. To follow up on what I was trying to say in my last post -- now that we have almost all of the aosp apps available to us, aosp launchers and tablet mode, I see no advantage to what an aosp base could bring us. Perhaps delusions of higher benchmark scores? Anyways sign me off please, I am not a supporter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sarcasm doesn't work well on forums... especially when money is involved...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
JohnnyQ1964 said:
I take a long view on my commitment on my pledge.
If Samsung comes out with their ICS, I get what I want for free... But we lose the skill set if someone developed it here and we will need someone to learn it when Jelly Bean comes out. I love Samsung hardware but hate their lack of commitment to their Android releases.
Edit: spelling error... Also hate auto correct
Sent from my SGH-I717M using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So... are you in or out?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
I'm still in.
Sent from my SGH-I717M using Tapatalk 2

Project AOSP! Let's do it!

Hi gang.
Here is an idea brewing in my head. I know it will spin your head. I am embarking on a mission to bring AOSP to this forsaken land... Fair warning. As you see, there is no "recognized developer" tag underneath my name and for a good reason, I am not one! An average newb here as far as AOSP deving is concerned. I do know the very basics, I did build a couple AOSP builds for the Dinc2 and Transformer prime, but that was trivial as those devices were already supported. This device is not. So, I'll need to figure out how to first setup the environment for this and then learn to make a kernel from the source HTC has (if they released it that is).
So, anyone here who can point me to the right direction to kick this off!?
This thread is intended to be a platform for all those interested in helping bring AOSP to our device. Any and all helpful suggestions in this regard will be appreciated!
Hell yeah! I'm pretty sure if we all pull together we can get something cooking. I was wondering though obviously we aren't on jelly bean. Would it be easier to build an ics cm9 and then add select features like the lock screen, camera, animations etc?
Linch89 said:
Hell yeah! I'm pretty sure if we all pull together we can get something cooking. I was wondering though obviously we aren't on jelly bean. Would it be easier to build an ics cm9 and then add select features like the lock screen, camera, animations etc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dunno. I was actually thinking if it is better to build Jellybean 4.1 rather than the latest and greatest 4.2.1. But if there aren't significant changes, may be we can pull off a 4.2 build. I just want to first learn to compile AOSP so that it even boots. I believe I need to mod files to build it for our environment... I wonder where I can learn this stuff..
Nits, Andy, help please!
My new laptop is running Windows 8 and I believe it will be a PITA to get Linux running natively on that due to the UEFI fiasco... I wonder if VM linux will be as fast as native... If not, I'll use my current machine to build and use the new one to due my regular stuff...
litetaker said:
Dunno. I was actually thinking if it is better to build Jellybean 4.1 rather than the latest and greatest 4.2.1. But if there aren't significant changes, may be we can pull off a 4.2 build. I just want to first learn to compile AOSP so that it even boots. I believe I need to mod files to build it for our environment... I wonder where I can learn this stuff..
Nits, Andy, help please!
My new laptop is running Windows 8 and I believe it will be a PITA to get Linux running natively on that due to the UEFI fiasco... I wonder if VM linux will be as fast as native... If not, I'll use my current machine to build and use the new one to due my regular stuff...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know as there are significant changes but most of the changes are with the lock screen and launcher.
Im up my incredible comes friday
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
jose51197 said:
Im up my incredible comes friday
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My new laptop has just arrived. I wanna ask, will building android be significantly hampered on a virtual machine instead of natively? This new machine comes with windows 8 and potentially will be a pain to load Linux on it. Plus this laptop is meant for someone else and I dont think they will be pleased with Linux on their PC...
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using XDA Premium HD app
litetaker said:
My new laptop has just arrived. I wanna ask, will building android be significantly hampered on a virtual machine instead of natively? This new machine comes with windows 8 and potentially will be a pain to load Linux on it. Plus this laptop is meant for someone else and I dont think they will be pleased with Linux on their PC...
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its always better to have full ubuntu, personally i have win8 too but i installed wubi for ubuntu and everything looks fine(for being a pentium) ubuntu doesnt take much
jose51197 said:
its always better to have full ubuntu, personally i have win8 too but i installed wubi for ubuntu and everything looks fine(for being a pentium) ubuntu doesnt take much
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG! First build in progress. The damn thing is ACTUALLY building, I think! But still, if I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath. 99.9% sure the end result will most likely not boot!
EDIT: Of course, all that I said before is of any value only if this thing finishes compiling without errors. And I already had a few errors (which I was able to fix). God, I hope this thing compiles! :fingers-crossed:
Update: Several compilation errors. Failure guys :/ Will retry tomorrow...
Hey litetaker, just wanna say thanks so much for doing this I really appreciate it and I'm sure many others do too!
Ill work with him today on my free time, also welcome the new team fireballas member litetaker
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
jose51197 said:
Ill work with him today on my free time, also welcome the new team fireballas member litetaker
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks buddy! Let's do this!
Watching you guys closely love what your doing for this community so for this and all future projects you may have plesse know I'm always willing to load up (Flash) any software you create no matter what beta stage it may be in, it is the least I can do for you and the rest of this great community since I can't develop which I wish I could oh do I wish but seriously keep that in mind my friends.
Sent from my all powerful Inc4G
prairiedogn said:
Watching you guys closely love what your doing for this community so for this and all future projects you may have plesse know I'm always willing to load up (Flash) any software you create no matter what beta stage it may be in, it is the least I can do for you and the rest of this great community since I can't develop which I wish I could oh do I wish but seriously keep that in mind my friends.
Sent from my all powerful Inc4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great to have volunteers, but by now we are just getting close to get a booteable cm10, will tell you when it boots
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
jose51197 said:
Great to have volunteers, but by now we are just getting close to get a booteable cm10, will tell you when it boots
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome, just awesome.
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda app-developers app
I've been informed that AOSP has booted on our phone..
andybones said:
I've been informed that AOSP has booted on our phone..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, news of s-off. Now, AOSP has booted. I don't know how this day can get any better.
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda app-developers app
Like I said I'm really starting to love this phone very happy with all the activity in this forum.
Sent from my all powerful Inc4G
andybones said:
I've been informed that AOSP has booted on our phone..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know who else is working with this?(only if you can tell)
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Aosp booted
Heres a video of my progress on aosp on this device(never developed a rom without proper files so this is new to me)
will put right here when it uploads
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ_AmZJ5Fu4
The evo 4g lte seems similar in specs to our phone in some regards and it has aosp. Could any of their work help us?
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda app-developers app

[4.2 PA Rom] - it's available!?

This thread is for Paranoid Android ROM .. links below. I'm facilitating for now, not involved in the development.
Anyone here tried it? I'm on Wookie 4.1, waiting for BB8 to smooth out before I take the 4.2 plunge. Feel free to chip in.
Thoughts?
The builder of this ROM maintains a presence on Rootzwiki, link below. Feel free to comment in this thread; he'll monitor here until further notice !
4.2.2 ROM
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/38279-romjb-bootloader-paranoidandroid-300r4-beta-unofficial-2212013/
Pretty cool. I'll have to try this later today. Also it's cool to try the pie on a tablet for a first time . But I'm wondering, does this use namidairos device tree.
Sent from my GT-N7000
Makrilli said:
Pretty cool. I'll have to try this later today. Also it's cool to try the pie on a tablet for a first time . But I'm wondering, does this use namidairos device tree.
Sent from my GT-N7000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, good to hear from Suomi :cyclops:
I have fond memories of Helsinki...my partner is from there. Yes I tried the slice 'o pie on my Nexus S, wasn't convinced. Maybe it's more useful on a tablet. Kindly share your experience if you give it a go.
Haha do you know any words anymore? And I might have a chance to flash in 30 minutes. Altrough I'll flash cm10.1 kernel after I'll flash this. As this isn't from xda. So I don't trust this 100%
Sent from my GT-N7000
---------- Post added at 10:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 AM ----------
Noooo! It's now set to private in mediafire can't download
Sent from my GT-N7000
---------- Post added at 10:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:18 AM ----------
Anyone managed to download this?
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Prime
Also waiting...
Makrilli said:
Haha do you know any words anymore? And I might have a chance to flash in 30 minutes. Altrough I'll flash cm10.1 kernel after I'll flash this. As this isn't from xda. So I don't trust this 100%
Sent from my GT-N7000
---------- Post added at 10:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 AM ----------
Noooo! It's now set to private in mediafire can't download
Sent from my GT-N7000
---------- Post added at 10:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:18 AM ----------
Anyone managed to download this?
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Prime
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm also waiting for it... I already added a comment that the mediafire link is set to private...
Hmm I tried other links from diff. web sites and they all pointed to the same host and yes it's set to private. Hopefully the dev is tinkering with it, improving it .... I'll check back later and update if it goes live.
Did some digging, OP updated.
And Makrili, I remember a few like keetos....huuva houmata and some other huuva stuff lol (apologies on spelling)
Thank really much for new link I'm downloading now. Btw I watched just a picture of a prime with 4.1 and I miss so much the old ui altrough the new ui nice too And haha nice
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Prime TF201
Dirty flashed over cm10.1, didn't have any other problems except my widgets disappearred so I have to create them again, but othing big Pie is nice and I also managed to get tabletUi back. But I miss the battery percentages in statusbar from cm10.1
Sent from my Asus Transformer Prime
Edit: I don't know why but my prime charges only about 40% in 12 hours altrough I'm using 5v 2a charger. And shutting down doesn't affect the speed. Also this rom was postes on rootzwiki: http://rootzwiki.com/topic/38279-romjb-bootloader-paranoidandroid-300r3-beta-unofficial-2132013/
is that rom stable and working? Are there any bugs? I can not find a description or changelog... greetz!
I'd say it's pretty stable. And obviesly it's working. And go to the link I posted a while ago, from there you'll find bugs
Sent from my Galaxy Note
Multiuser bug
Makrilli said:
I'd say it's pretty stable. And obviesly it's working. And go to the link I posted a while ago, from there you'll find bugs
Sent from my Galaxy Note
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Switching between multiple users causes my prime to crash with the 4.2.2 build from Feb 13
The 4.2.2 build came February 15... but anyway. I just tried and my prime also crashed, and obviesly I didn't use any themes. Earlier when I tried multi user worked on cm10.1 :/
Edit: I went to settings and made a new user on my main user, the press the new user, unlock and set it up. And after that it won't crash
Edit2: nope switched between users few times and my prime crashed again
Sent from my Galaxy Note.
And if anyone was wondering where the hell the device repo was: https://github.com/Voyager2k/android_device_asus_tf201
Can't wait to try this. How's the PIE treatment been for those who have it?
McJesus15 said:
Can't wait to try this. How's the PIE treatment been for those who have it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know anything about this ROM specifically. I've built my own version of PA. I've been trying out pie and it's OK but it's nothing like having the nav bar down there. The nav bar is just so much easier and has more functionality than the pie controls. imho the tablet mode with PA is the way to go. It's much better than tablet mode with other ROMs like jellybeer. PA maintains the ability to customize the nav bar and status bar toggles while in tablet mode. Most other ROMs I've tried with tablet mode feature, when you are in tablet mode you lose any customization abilities.
b.huss, looking forward to seeing your result from tinkering with PA ROM....
tweeny80 said:
b.huss, looking forward to seeing your result from tinkering with PA ROM....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Great dev. PA is already good so it should be awesome
Sent from my Zio using xda app-developers app
I happen to be the builder of this particular ROM. Glad to see this getting some attention over here, as I'm not getting a lot of feedback over at rootz. The device tree is namidairo's with a couple of things removed to get PA to work. Any other questions/bugs, let me know. I can't release it here due to my low post count.
Voyager2k said:
I happen to be the builder of this particular ROM. Glad to see this getting some attention over here, as I'm not getting a lot of feedback over at rootz. The device tree is namidairo's with a couple of things removed to get PA to work. Any other questions/bugs, let me know. I can't release it here due to my low post count.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May sound stupid but how the f*** does PIE work? I couldn't figure it out lol
Sent from my Zio using xda app-developers app

Ubuntu Touch On the G2

http://www.engadget.com/2013/10/17/a-stable-version-of-ubuntus-mobile-os-is-available-now/
I know we are still a community very young here in the G2 forums but I think some Ubuntu goodness would be good to have as a choice. The stable version just launched for the Nexus 4. I've no deving experience but it'd be cool if a dev could take a look and see if it's possible to do a port :fingers-crossed:
Not to burst the bubble but, at least on the N7, it's totally unstable, and unusable.
Doesn't mean development can't start. Get the groundwork in place so when the Ubuntu Touch source is more refined, then a full-fledged ROM won't be much far away.
More options is a good thing even if they have maturing to do.
Personally, I'm interested in seeing how the docking-as-a-desktop thing will perform considering the specs of this phone being so nice.
Sent from my VS980 4G using xda app-developers app
fr4nk1yn said:
Not to burst the bubble but, at least on the N7, it's totally unstable, and unusable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what i understand, that's why they haven't officially released it for tablets yet.
bumping, because well... a man can dream!
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 4
Bumping
Bump
Sent from Odin's beard
Bump Bump Bump
Bumpbumpbump
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk
Buy some Unix/Linux books and start reading. Develop it yourself if it's that important to you!
cggorman said:
Buy some Unix/Linux books and start reading. Develop it yourself if it's that important to you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awwwww.... come on.
This would be an interesting choice but I feel that Android is more touch friendly than Ubuntu would ever be.
Any development is good development.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Ubuntu Touch's gesture based navigation seems really sweet, but the lack of apps seems worrying.
qipengart said:
Awwwww.... come on.
This would be an interesting choice but I feel that Android is more touch friendly than Ubuntu would ever be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was under the impression that Ubuntu was more touch friendly than android what with gestures etc.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Anyone with knowledge about ROM building and would like to take on the task @Th3Bill has been working with Ubuntu for android based products for a long time. He is currently working on Ubuntu touch for another device. He could probably give someone pointers.
I would love to try out Ubuntu touch. Been very excited about since it was first announced.
Sent from my LG-G2 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 02:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:47 PM ----------
fr4nk1yn said:
Not to burst the bubble but, at least on the N7, it's totally unstable, and unusable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was able to use it on my galaxy nexus just fine. Everything worked near flawlessly. Just couldn't make or receive phone calls or text but that's because I was on CDMA. From what I remember they have had several very stable builds on a few devices. Just no interest because of app development.
But my view on this is if its made available for more devices then eventually someone will pick up development of apps for it. The people that have say its very easy.
Sent from my LG-G2 using Tapatalk
qipengart said:
Awwwww.... come on.
This would be an interesting choice but I feel that Android is more touch friendly than Ubuntu would ever be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I thought the same when I started playing around with building it the other day, I will say that it's a VERY nice UI they have made. It seemed very simple to navigate.
---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:56 PM ----------
tsdeaton said:
Anyone with knowledge about ROM building and would like to take on the task @Th3Bill has been working with Ubuntu for android based products for a long time. He is currently working on Ubuntu touch for another device. He could probably give someone pointers.
I would love to try out Ubuntu touch. Been very excited about since it was first announced.
Sent from my LG-G2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ubuntu touch I'm new with...just been doing for last 2 days LOL. I have been in the Android scene for a while, though (@tsdeaton knows me from the good ol Photon).
I will say this...UT is not as simple as it seems. I've got issues with multiple things so far (pretty much, I have a nice, pretty UI with a semi-functioning camera and NO networking or sound so far), but am working at figuring out how they get this working on their native devices and hoping to reverse engineer what they did for the HTC One.
As far as their native builds, the N10 and N7 are greatly lagging behind the N4 and GNex in terms of stability. If you check out their current status of each build (I don't have a link, but a quick googling should find it), you'll get an idea of the daunting task ahead of anyone looking to make this work.
Th3Bill said:
While I thought the same when I started playing around with building it the other day, I will say that it's a VERY nice UI they have made. It seemed very simple to navigate.
---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:56 PM ----------
Ubuntu touch I'm new with...just been doing for last 2 days LOL. I have been in the Android scene for a while, though (@tsdeaton knows me from the good ol Photon).
I will say this...UT is not as simple as it seems. I've got issues with multiple things so far (pretty much, I have a nice, pretty UI with a semi-functioning camera and NO networking or sound so far), but am working at figuring out how they get this working on their native devices and hoping to reverse engineer what they did for the HTC One.
As far as their native builds, the N10 and N7 are greatly lagging behind the N4 and GNex in terms of stability. If you check out their current status of each build (I don't have a link, but a quick googling should find it), you'll get an idea of the daunting task ahead of anyone looking to make this work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had a hell of a time even getting it to compile. Let alone run on the device. Respect to the person that takes on this task.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
popshovit said:
I had a hell of a time even getting it to compile. Let alone run on the device. Respect to the person that takes on this task.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Compile was not too hard...I can get that far. It looks really nice when it boots, which took all of 12 seconds on first boot. I thought it had hung on a boot animation when I realized there was a status bar...LOL. It's pretty smooth and a VERY nice UI to be honest (and I don't really like ubuntu on the PC...I'm a Mint fan myself).
It's the part where they start talking about audio and writing Alsa UCM mixer files that I get a bit lost, as they have links to what SHOULD be reference material on HiFi and VoiceCall, yet both go to "Page does not exist" pages, thus leaving the builder on their own to figure it out.
Camera and wifi I should be able to fix. Phone, data, etc...I'm not sure that will work right without a LOT of work.
Th3Bill said:
While I thought the same when I started playing around with building it the other day, I will say that it's a VERY nice UI they have made. It seemed very simple to navigate.
---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:56 PM ----------
Ubuntu touch I'm new with...just been doing for last 2 days LOL. I have been in the Android scene for a while, though (@tsdeaton knows me from the good ol Photon).
I will say this...UT is not as simple as it seems. I've got issues with multiple things so far (pretty much, I have a nice, pretty UI with a semi-functioning camera and NO networking or sound so far), but am working at figuring out how they get this working on their native devices and hoping to reverse engineer what they did for the HTC One.
As far as their native builds, the N10 and N7 are greatly lagging behind the N4 and GNex in terms of stability. If you check out their current status of each build (I don't have a link, but a quick googling should find it), you'll get an idea of the daunting task ahead of anyone looking to make this work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha sorry I got you and loki mixed up. But what I seen of yours is a great start for the nonbelievers. Is Loki still around? He was the one in the Ubuntu scene
Edit found him
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1281528
BTW wouldn't it be interesting to have something like this set up for other devices
Sent from my LG-G2 using Tapatalk
player911 said:
Any development is good development.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree. I would like to see how it progresses. It's nice looking already.
Sent from my LG-G2 using xda app-developers app

KitKat - any interest/talent left?

I know, I know... the droid x2 is a lost cause, but i have to make it last a little while longer and I have 2 of them so...
Is anyone interested or talented enough to try to get CM11 (kitkat) ported over to this device? I know @kev1nMark has been "talking" to dragonzkiller about getting into it, but anyone else have resources to contribute? I've never worked on the device at such a low level before, but I have written apps for it as well as know a thing or two about code. I'm happy to contribute whatever i can, even if its as simple as running up tests on my spare device.
Thoughts?
smallzfsu said:
I know, I know... the droid x2 is a lost cause, but i have to make it last a little while longer and I have 2 of them so...
Is anyone interested or talented enough to try to get CM11 (kitkat) ported over to this device? I know @kev1nMark has been "talking" to dragonzkiller about getting into it, but anyone else have resources to contribute? I've never worked on the device at such a low level before, but I have written apps for it as well as know a thing or two about code. I'm happy to contribute whatever i can, even if its as simple as running up tests on my spare device.
Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am considering it. This devices is a royal pain to work with though. I will see what i can do.
I'm certainly willing to test any builds that may come up, I'll have to locate a wall charger though..
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
smallzfsu said:
I've never worked on the device at such a low level before, but I have written apps for it as well as know a thing or two about code. I'm happy to contribute whatever i can, even if its as simple as running up tests on my spare device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the same situation. It's looking like a good deal of work and might be a task I just simply don't have the skill for at this point. Still, I really want to have a useful old phone. Gingerbread makes me sad. Jelly Bean is just a resource hog. I've always wanted to learn a little more about the ROM build process and this might be a decent way to do it.
How does one go about porting KitKat to the X2?
markrulesallnow said:
How does one go about porting KitKat to the X2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is where I'm starting also w/ dragonzkiller's CM10 repos. http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Doc:_porting_intro
EDIT: Perhaps it's better to start building an updated CM10 just to get everything building correctly? With my lack of experience diving right into CM11 seems a bit bold.
One can simply put cm11 framework on a cm10 base but that's not what we want.
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
AKShotgun said:
One can simply put cm11 framework on a cm10 base but that's not what we want.
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not what we want, but it may be our only option.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Should anyone decide to take on this herculean task, I'll be more than happy to be a test bunny. My X2 is presently a glorified paperweight.
-blu
I have a Milestone X2 running under the ACS Alaska carrier. My device is rooted and I've used every ROM that Larson Thorpe has put in his MX2 collection. The ICS and JB roms did work, but had too many issues/crashes/reboots/etc so I just stuck with Eclipse 2.3 which is based on Gingerbread.
This phone is just... hard to deal with sometimes, and we all know it's mostly due to the amount of RAM. KitKat seems to take care of a ton of memory issues in Android (tested on my N7.) People have said that KitKat won't actually improve older devices by much, but any improvement would be amazing!
I'm totally down to fully test any builds anyone comes up with. I wish I could help build/develop for this phone, but I'm a web developer and have absolutely no skill with ROM building or kernels or anything like that.
Here's to hoping!
I can get everything set up and running (as in, ready to compile) but the compile errors are truly a mess to debug.
Is anyone willing to make a "how to" thread that describes how to make a basic rom, specific to this phone?
I think enough people are still interested, but I think we'd get further if we helped to educate each other.
LaserChicken said:
Is anyone willing to make a "how to" thread that describes how to make a basic rom, specific to this phone?
I think enough people are still interested, but I think we'd get further if we helped to educate each other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is about the closest thing I have seen, thanks Kevin for pointing it out already:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Doc:_porting_intro
Maybe once it gets put on more devices and development starts up again. You could ask nitroglycerin if he would be willing to update eclipse. But being a 512mb device this would be huge.
Sent from my GT-N5110 using XDA Premium HD app
Since we don't have a unlocked bootloader we can't just download the source and compile it, it takes a lot of skill. That's why we have a low development rate
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
AKShotgun said:
Since we don't have a unlocked bootloader we can't just download the source and compile it, it takes a lot of skill. That's why we have a low development rate
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, actually, you can have CM compile around a pre-compiled kernel (what we have) but there's more to it than that.
One, we already have graphics issues...and KitKat forces you to have newer drivers or else you get black artifacting
This is due to OpenGL 3 not being supported by the vendor blobs
Our blobs don't even have ICS support...
Another nightmare is, yes, getting CM to take the precompiled kernel
If I got my hands on the source that the cm10.1 rom is based off of, we could start work
I would aim to start with 10.2, then maybe add in cm11 features but keep the old system
It would make things easier, keep radios, wifi, storage and display working...hopefully
Also, being as I'm on cm10, could anyone link me the patched recovery?
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one on the ol' X2, this would be so awesome if we got a KitKat ROM
Sent from my MB870 using xda app-developers app
optimusprimeuya said:
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one on the ol' X2, this would be so awesome if we got a KitKat ROM
Sent from my MB870 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm literally ready to start working on it now
But I need our device stuff and I'm waiting for a reply to a PM for it
---------- Post added at 09:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:45 AM ----------
Kevin M said:
I can get everything set up and running (as in, ready to compile) but the compile errors are truly a mess to debug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have the device tree?
That's all I really need to get started
I want to do this soooo badly
Hell...I'm willing to do this Nexus Image style: hacking the files into a precompiled image to get it working
---------- Post added at 10:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:47 AM ----------
Found the sources
smallzfsu said:
I know, I know... the droid x2 is a lost cause, but i have to make it last a little while longer and I have 2 of them so...
Is anyone interested or talented enough to try to get CM11 (kitkat) ported over to this device? I know @kev1nMark has been "talking" to dragonzkiller about getting into it, but anyone else have resources to contribute? I've never worked on the device at such a low level before, but I have written apps for it as well as know a thing or two about code. I'm happy to contribute whatever i can, even if its as simple as running up tests on my spare device.
Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am willing to test. My programming skills are certainly not up to this task, but I would like to learn. Any way to get started?
polymath257 said:
I am willing to test. My programming skills are certainly not up to this task, but I would like to learn. Any way to get started?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm about to go work on it now
Maybe we'll have it in two weeks? No? Probably not...
I'll try building CM11, but don't expect the graphics to work
At all

Categories

Resources