Hello..i wanna buy and galaxy player ..
I'm a gamer...i play GAMES..many games..
Who is better for games?Compatibility,performance,etc..
Or,mby i buy an kindle fire?But i'm not from america..
I think 5.0 better for games, because it have larger resolution.
And 4.0 and 5.0 have the same insides (CPU, GPU)
RobyRc said:
Hello..i wanna buy and galaxy player ..
I'm a gamer...i play GAMES..many games..
Who is better for games?Compatibility,performance,etc..
Or,mby i buy an kindle fire?But i'm not from america..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Advantages of the 4.0 is easily replaceable battery and better DAC (audio). Everything else i would lean to the 5.0.
Both the 4 and 5 have the same resolution but different screen sizes.
If you are going to play, get the 5.
Sent from my YP-G70
If you are a real gamer. 5.0 is the best .
RobyRc said:
Hello..i wanna buy and galaxy player ..
I'm a gamer...i play GAMES..many games..
Who is better for games?Compatibility,performance,etc..
Or,mby i buy an kindle fire?But i'm not from america..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I currently own the Galaxy Player 5.0 and would definitely recommend it over the 4.0. The size is PERFECT for gaming! I use it all the time with MC3/Sims/etc
You definitely won't regret going for a 5.0 over the 4.0, it still fits in pockets just fine and just feels more useful due to the extra screen space.
ZaIINN said:
I currently own the Galaxy Player 5.0 and would definitely recommend it over the 4.0. The size is PERFECT for gaming! I use it all the time with MC3/Sims/etc
You definitely won't regret going for a 5.0 over the 4.0, it still fits in pockets just fine and just feels more useful due to the extra screen space.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow , how can you play mc3 ?. I download from google play and had infinitie loop on gameloft logo.
Sent from my LG-P970 using XDA
ok..ty..but..
Galaxy Player 5.0 or Galaxy s?I need a good devince for games..who is better for games?
p.s:galaxy player 5.0 can run gta 3?
RobyRc said:
ok..ty..but..
Galaxy Player 5.0 or Galaxy s?I need a good devince for games..who is better for games?
p.s:galaxy player 5.0 can run gta 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd go with galaxy s becuase its alot easier to find games like the ones from gameloft unlike the player its not on google play they have the same hardware i have galaxy player 4 i got it over 5 becuase the 4 is good in pockets the 5 was really big to fit in my pockets
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
I have the 5.0 and really enjoy the nice large screen, you can see the detail better even though they both have the same resolution. But sometimes the 5.0 is a smudge too big at times, but get whatever one that you decide is the best.
I chose the 4.0 over the 5.0 because the pixels on the 4.0 are more dense. meaning the screen on the 4.0 is more sharper than the 5.0 screen.
RobyRc said:
ok..ty..but..
Galaxy Player 5.0 or Galaxy s?I need a good devince for games..who is better for games?
p.s:galaxy player 5.0 can run gta 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have 5.0 ..gta 3 works fine and today i overclock it and now gta 3 flies almost everyhing on max.I have android phone with 3.7 inch screen and a tablet with 7 inch but this 5 inch seems perfect for me and it feets in any pocket.
Sent from my YP-G70 using XDA
mr_ggcstop said:
I think 5.0 better for games, because it have larger resolution.
And 4.0 and 5.0 have the same insides (CPU, GPU)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't have a higher resolution; it has a larger screen. There's a difference. They both have 800 x 480 resolution but the 5.0 screen is larger, brighter, and clearer.
dorfd1 said:
I chose the 4.0 over the 5.0 because the pixels on the 4.0 are more dense. meaning the screen on the 4.0 is more sharper than the 5.0 screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'd think so because in theory that makes sense, but in practice that's not true. The 4.0 screen is over-dense. The 5.0 screen looks beautiful. The resolution is excellent on it. Both movies and games look stunning.
what will people do when the battery dies in the 5.0 and won't recharge anymore?
I prefer the 5.0 over the 4.0. I currently own both of them and prefer gaming much better on the 5.0. The 5.0 also has CyanogenMod 9 (one of the most famous ROMs out there) with Android Ice Cream Sandwich.
Go with the 5.0.
That would be in 3-4 years..till then there would be better devices and you would change it anyway much sooner.
Sent from my YP-G70 using XDA
Related
Hi dear,
I'm going to get either Galaxy S2 or Galaxy Note.
The price difference between them is quite big..
GS2 is 730 NZD and Galaxy Note is 1199 NZD(as its just released?)
Do you think galaxy note has that much worthy?
What do think guys?
It depends whether you want a phone or a small tablet that can make calls. I've handled a prototype Note and it's not something you can comfortably use with one hand.
Ospreylian said:
It depends whether you want a phone or a small tablet that can make calls. I've handled a prototype Note and it's not something you can comfortably use with one hand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh is it?
But I do have iPad 2..
What I like from Galaxy Note is the high resolution display.
It Is awesome I gues.. As I was iPhone 4 user so I do care the density of the screen. It should be clear and crisp.
It's also an inch bigger, and uses PenTile matrix, both of which detract from the 1280x720 resolution's pixel density. So really, it's about a wash in terms of clarity compared to the 4.3" SGS2.
Then there's always the Galaxy Nexus, also 1280x720, but half an inch smaller than the Note. Sadly though, it's not running Exynos/Mali, but it does come with ICS and a guarantee of being at the head of the queue for updates and custom ROMs.
Croak said:
It's also an inch bigger, and uses PenTile matrix, both of which detract from the 1280x720 resolution's pixel density. So really, it's about a wash in terms of clarity compared to the 4.3" SGS2.
Then there's always the Galaxy Nexus, also 1280x720, but half an inch smaller than the Note. Sadly though, it's not running Exynos/Mali, but it does come with ICS and a guarantee of being at the head of the queue for updates and custom ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I concerned.
Galaxy note and s2 will get ICS at some time in Q2 in 2011..
That's too late, right?
Galaxy note has better specs, but sgs2 is better for size for the main user
Sent from my HTC Desire S using xda premium
Galaxy Note are for users who 'CBF' carrying an eight-ten inch tablet, but still wants all the power and resolution necessary for web browsing and movie watching.
Galaxy S II will be intended for gamer (running on Full screen), who prefer web browsing on the go while making phone calls and sending text messages.
The Galaxy Note beats or matches in the SGS2 in everything. The only reason why someone should choose the SGS2 over the Note is because of the price and size.
MrAndroid12 said:
Galaxy Note are for users who 'CBF' carrying an eight-ten inch tablet, but still wants all the power and resolution necessary for web browsing and movie watching.
Galaxy S II will be intended for gamer (running on Full screen), who prefer web browsing on the go while making phone calls and sending text messages.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But, galaxy note is a PHONE not only a device that can be necessary for web browsing and movie watching..
I feel playing game on my iPad is better than on galaxy s2 in terms of screen size though which means game on galaxy note will be much more fun than on galaxy s2.
jorkobe23 said:
But, galaxy note is a PHONE not only a device that can be necessary for web browsing and movie watching..
I feel playing game on my iPad is better than on galaxy s2 in terms of screen size though which means game on galaxy note will be much more fun than on galaxy s2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem as mentioned above, Running standard android games on HD screen doesn't make it run FULL screen.
Yes galaxy note is a phone, but a 4.3 inch SGSII is already a humongous phone. A 5.6' phone doesn't make it ideal for making phone calls
Galaxy SII v Note
I'm stoked about the Note. I currently have a Galaxy S and S II. I was waiting for the Galaxy Tab 7.7, but the Note may do the job. I do design work and I am excited to use the stylus to cut and paste images, do simple drawings, etc.
The other thing I don't like about the S and SII is that when typing emails, I can only see about 1 or two lines of text that I'm typing. I think with the Note, you'll see more.
The biggest problem with the Note is the price. For me it's about $850 USD. That's just too much.
I am also considering buying a Galaxy Nexus on Verizon. I swore I'd never go back to Verizon but the Nexus should have their 4 G as well as the 4G radios for AT&T and T-Mobile.
Samsung is so prolific at spitting out these phones that it's hard to choose. They even have a 4" screened model with a full QWERTY. Not too shabby!
hi, you could also wait foe the sgs2 lte hd, its gonna have a 4,65 inches display with super amoled plus hd display, 1.5 ghz cpu 1gb ram, 16gb onboard memory and so on its supossed to be available in december.
i've got the sgs2 international and can't be happier.
if you are using the sgs1 or 2 you could use nitrality to change de dpi from 240 to 182 and get more on screen space for wrintting emails and whatever you want, i did it and looks even better.
the note, is realy nice, played with it at ifa here in berlin, realy nice device, and if you wear a jacket always or most of the time it schouln't be a problem, but i would say is to big for jeans pockets, or maybe not, but it would big the risk to break it probably.
Im waitig for the 7.7
Sent from my HTC Desire S using xda premium
nicgom said:
hi, you could also wait foe the sgs2 lte hd, its gonna have a 4,65 inches display with super amoled plus hd display, 1.5 ghz cpu 1gb ram, 16gb onboard memory and so on its supossed to be available in december.
i've got the sgs2 international and can't be happier.
if you are using the sgs1 or 2 you could use nitrality to change de dpi from 240 to 182 and get more on screen space for wrintting emails and whatever you want, i did it and looks even better.
the note, is realy nice, played with it at ifa here in berlin, realy nice device, and if you wear a jacket always or most of the time it schouln't be a problem, but i would say is to big for jeans pockets, or maybe not, but it would big the risk to break it probably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the input. I don't think we'll see a Galaxy SII in the states with LTE anytime soon. AT&T and TMO just got their SIIs and neither is capable of LTE.
I think I'll most likely try the Verizon Nexus Prime because it will have (850/1700/1900/2100) 3g and Verizon Lte and then get the Galaxy S III next year. If cash permits, I'll get the Note too. If it had quad band 3g and Verizon LTE, I'd just buy the Note.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hi,
If you like to listen to Music on your phone, then please dont buy SGS2, it has a crappy Yamaha audio codec. Fankly I think that is the only disadvantage of SGS2.
I usually browse and listen to music, I find the music to be sub-par when compared to my Ipod.
Better go for a superphone with Wolfson Audio codec.
Check which audio codec is present in Galaxy Note or Go for Galaxy Nexus, I think it has Wolfson audio codec (as Nexus S had the same)...
Or one more option is the New Slim Motorola Droid Razr (7.1mm), which even below advantages :
- Check its audio codec, it must be wolfson I guess
- has a better battery (1780MAh)
- Higher resolution than SGS2 (540 x 960)
- Spash resistant
- Metal casing but still 127Gm
- Might not have the pink spot that SGS2 has.
- Might not have the yellow tint effect on screen that SGS2 has.
- hdmi port
- comes with 2.3.5 and guaranteed ICS support coming for this model
There are too many advantages that Droid Razr has over SGS2.
How crappy is Yamaha codec?
Is audio even throughout the spectrum?
Head over to anadtech for a detailed review of SGS2 audio performance... Below is the link:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4686/samsung-galaxy-s-2-international-review-the-best-redefined/13
He clearly says Yamaha audio codec is not a good audio codec (compared to Wolfson...), and wolfson is far better (which we find in SGS1, Nexus S....)
I am using SG-note.. For last few days ..
So fare i thing its kind of mini tablet.which works batter than all small tablet.. I think it will be unfaire to compare SG-note vs SGSII.
SGSII is the best smartphone for me ... Thanks to samsung ..
What can i say abt SG-note it just too smart phone..
I think you should go for SGNote.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Wait a few months after the note has been superseded by yet another Samsung device and you're be able to pick one up for a lot less, nothing wrong with the sgs2 and won't be out specced for some time, Blimey I remember the days when all PDAs had a stylus much better, that would be the only reason I would be interested in getting a note
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Just now checked in Engadget, Galaxy Note has the same Yamaha audio codec as SGS2.
If you are a audio freak or even a casual audio listener, I do not suggest going to SGS2 or Galaxy Note. Try either Galaxy Nexus or Moto Droid Razr.
Who is better?
I know galaxy player isn't phone..
I want a good devince for games..
Pls awn!
If you want a large screen and you want to play with your device.i think the Galaxy Note is your device...
I don't have money )
The Galaxy Player is basically the Galaxy S without AMOLED and phone capabilities.
Sent from my YP-G70 using Tapatalk
RobyRc said:
Who is better?
I know galaxy player isn't phone..
I want a good devince for games..
Pls awn!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why have you started THREE different threads on the same topic?
SGP5 is the best bang for your buck, anything else you'll be paying a premium so you can not use the cell aspect of the device. There's tablets too, but those are much more expensive and not pocket friendly. SGP will run almost all games with a little tweaking.
well then go with the Galaxy Player i have it since the beginning of february and i love it!I use it for gaming,to listening to music and watch a Smallville on it.The games run smooth,the sound is very nice (thy to SoundAlive) and the movies look good on it because of the resolution.
Aside from the fact that the note has slightly higher specs plus a mechanical button, aren't they nearly identical?
There are several ROMs in that section of the forums I would love to try but I don't have time to test nor do I want to brick my device. Although I could always restore from a CWM backup if that situation ever arises.
raishiro said:
Aside from the fact that the note has slightly higher specs plus a mechanical button, aren't they nearly identical?
There are several ROMs in that section of the forums I would love to try but I don't have time to test nor do I want to brick my device. Although I could always restore from a CWM backup if that situation ever arises.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Don't try that lol I think "slightly higher specs" overlooks the fact that it's meant for a 1280 x 720 screen. Our galaxy can only output at 800 x 480 with a single core processor as opposed to a dual/quad (depending on version) processor. The two phones are not a like at all. Size of the phone doesn't constitute equality in software/hardware terms.
Thought so. At first I assumed the note was just the player with calling abilities. Thanks
raishiro said:
Thought so. At first I assumed the note was just the player with calling abilities. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung Galaxy S is closer to the GP than the Note is I think.
Rapydax said:
Samsung Galaxy S is closer to the GP than the Note is I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct. The Samsung Galaxy Player 4/5 is basically a super-sized Galaxy S. There is actually on very minor differences between the two (the SGPs have much better overall performance for reasons).
I really hope Samsung decides to re-re-fresh the SGP line up with something that could turn heads... I mean throw SuperAMOLED on an Media player with a little higher resolution (maybe 720p) and I'd be sold asap.
ZaIINN said:
Correct. The Samsung Galaxy Player 4/5 is basically a super-sized Galaxy S. There is actually on very minor differences between the two (the SGPs have much better overall performance for reasons).
I really hope Samsung decides to re-re-fresh the SGP line up with something that could turn heads... I mean throw SuperAMOLED on an Media player with a little higher resolution (maybe 720p) and I'd be sold asap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Add in a better processor and more ram and I am in. I love my Player 5, but it is too laggy.
Apparently Samsung is going to release a 5.8 inch galaxy player with ICS and a dual core processor http://www.technobuffalo.com/companies/samsung/galaxy-player-yp-gp1-revealed/
heat361 said:
Apparently Samsung is going to release a 5.8 inch galaxy player with ICS and a dual core processor http://www.technobuffalo.com/companies/samsung/galaxy-player-yp-gp1-revealed/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol 5.8 inches? Now that's an odd size for the screen. It's like they are trying to make it a Galaxy Note Successor. They should really keep it in the mp3 player range since the new iPod touch is on the way and this would make a great competitor to it. Also I don't know why they decide to make it 5.8 inches the PPI is going be only 189 (Same as the GP 5.0 now) 1280 X 720 (PPI of 253) or 1024 * 768 (PPI of 221 same as GP 4.2 although the problem with this res is it isn't in 16:9 -___-) If they made it 4-5in they can keep that resolution and it would still look great.
Great, finally some specs, I have been waiting for more info about this upcoming device.. but 5.8” screen?? WTF? Isn’t it a bit too large? Isn’t it getting a bit too far into unpocketable tablet range? I mean GP 5.0 was just pocketable, but an almost 6” device in my mind would defeat the purpose of a media device you could carry with you in you jeans and getting too close to the 7” range of tablets. Nonetheless, I hope Samsung hasn’t forgotten about bt handsfree profile this time (the way they did with GP 5.0) and implemented it in the new player. IF the price is right, I will get it. I also think that in order to compete with the new iPod that Apple will be announcing soon (if the gossips are right) which might have an 640 x 1136 (that’s a weird resolution) screen, Samsung should have gone with a higher res screen, though lower res screens are easier on battery. BTW, do you guys think the new 2-core processor would consume the battery much quicker? One of the things I really liked about the GP 5.0 was its battery life.
Ouch a 5.8 inch screen is pretty darn big for a PMP. Is there any chance the actual size is 4.8 inches (same size as S III)? Also the res is exactly 16:9, just worked it out now. The player 5 is slightly off 16:9 so it might make watching movies a bit easier
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Supermaster34 said:
Ouch a 5.8 inch screen is pretty darn big for a PMP. Is there any chance the actual size is 4.8 inches (same size as S III)? Also the res is exactly 16:9, just worked it out now. The player 5 is slightly off 16:9 so it might make watching movies a bit easier
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think they realize that is bigger than a Playstation Vita lol, but the Vita from the specs has a better CPU and GPU lol.
If the prise is the same like 5.0 (cost me 160 euros) i may actualy bought one.In my country there is no nexus 7 sold...problem with this new player i thing is that is too long if this specs are corect..thah is 25 mm more then 5.0.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
---------- Post added at 10:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:04 AM ----------
baladev said:
Great, finally some specs, I have been waiting for more info about this upcoming device.. but 5.8” screen?? WTF? Isn’t it a bit too large? Isn’t it getting a bit too far into unpocketable tablet range? I mean GP 5.0 was just pocketable, but an almost 6” device in my mind would defeat the purpose of a media device you could carry with you in you jeans and getting too close to the 7” range of tablets. Nonetheless, I hope Samsung hasn’t forgotten about bt handsfree profile this time (the way they did with GP 5.0) and implemented it in the new player. IF the price is right, I will get it. I also think that in order to compete with the new iPod that Apple will be announcing soon (if the gossips are right) which might have an 640 x 1136 (that’s a weird resolution) screen, Samsung should have gone with a higher res screen, though lower res screens are easier on battery. BTW, do you guys think the new 2-core processor would consume the battery much quicker? One of the things I really liked about the GP 5.0 was its battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher resolution screen would cost much more and drain more battery..i dont have a problem with
resolution on 5.0..that is stilll better resolution then 99.9% of 10.1 tablets which all have 1280*780 on 4 times bigger screen.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
DZonikg said:
If the prise is the same like 5.0 (cost me 160 euros) i may actualy bought one.In my country there is no nexus 7 sold...problem with this new player i thing is that is too long if this specs are corect..thah is 25 mm more then 5.0.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
---------- Post added at 10:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:04 AM ----------
Higher resolution screen would cost much more and drain more battery..i dont have a problem with
resolution on 5.0..that is stilll better resolution then 99.9% of 10.1 tablets which all have 1280*780 on 4 times bigger screen.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually the tablet screen is either 1280 X 800 or 1280 X 720 lol. Sure the GP 5.0 does have a sharper display, with a PPI of 187 PPI, compared to a 10.1 in tablet with a res of 1280 X 720 145 PPI or 1280 X800 with a PPI of 149 you have to realize that you hold tablets much further from your face.
I think Samsung over did t with the screen size lol if they want to compete in the MP3 world they need to make it competitive with the iPod touch.
I don't think it will be 5.8, it would be damn too huge. I'd say between 4.5'' and 5.0'' and I hope they sell this cheap, because if it's higher than $200, it's better to buy a nexus 7 LOL.
its an odd size but i definitely looks worthy of my money
zaclimon said:
I don't think it will be 5.8, it would be damn too huge. I'd say between 4.5'' and 5.0'' and I hope they sell this cheap, because if it's higher than $200, it's better to buy a nexus 7 LOL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess they will probably have all sizes like now..now you have 4 different sizes.It looks veru similar like galaxy S3 ..5.0 looks almost the same like samsung note.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
5.8 is just too big
Some people say it's only 4.8"
Knowing Samsung it may well be 5.8 inch. They have 3.6 (player and galaxy ace?) inch devices, 4 inch (player, sgs1), 4.2 inch (player), 4.3 inch (s2?), 4.65 inch (GNex), 4.8 inch (s3), 5 inch (player), 5.3 inch, (note), 5.5 inch (note 2?), 7 inch and 10.1 inch (tabs). All they are missing is ~6 inches so they might see it as a way of plugging a niche market.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Supermaster34 said:
All they are missing is ~6 inches so they might see it as a way of plugging a niche market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, that's really niche isn't it? Imagine, someone walks into a store and asks a shop assistant - 'dude, i want something slightly larger than 5.5" but not quite as big as 6"! And Samsung wants him to reply - "we have just the thing for you!" LOL
oh yes, and you forgot 7.7"..
baladev said:
Lol, that's really niche isn't it? Imagine, someone walks into a store and asks a shop assistant - 'dude, i want something slightly larger than 5.5" but not quite as big as 6"! And Samsung wants him to reply - "we have just the thing for you!" LOL
oh yes, and you forgot 7.7"..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I reckon Samsung's financial model is to flood the market with devices of every size so there is something for everyone. Oops Samsung just have too many screen sizes to remember them all
Nah, their strategy is if they have hundreds of different devices, Apple can't ban them all!: P
Sent using Tapatalk
I'm not gonna buy another samsung device ever... They release a thousand of devices and after they just update a couple... **** Samsung!
rafa6571 said:
I'm not gonna buy another samsung device ever... They release a thousand of devices and after they just update a couple... **** Samsung!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see your point although it is hard to support many different devices. I'm currently considering never buying a non-nexus device again
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
I am also getting a little fed up with Samsung; they never update, they put their own stupid bt stack in instead of android's (result is no wiimote), and they fill the system with touchwiz junk. Now if Google could just sell a nexus pmp!
Sent using Tapatalk
I don't know weather to get the 4.2 or 5. I want the 5 but its way too big
personal preference . i like the 5.0.
4.2 has omap processor while the 5.0 has exynos, which is slightly better even at the same clock rate. 4.2 has 2mp camera while the 5.0 has 3.2 or 5 in korean version. 5.0 has much better devving and rom choice and it also does fit in your pocket!
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
5.0has flash wich can also be a flashlight and yes has more to offer for devving.big screen easy to watch movies.specs are out there
The only thing 4.2 has over 5.0 is the blutooth handsfree profile, it can be used as a bt hf with tablets and phones, which means if you are listening to your music and your phone rings, you can answer the call through 4.2, this can be very convenient, however this feature doesn't work with all phones. Oh, you can call people to, it can dial numbers which are in your contacts. If you don't care about this, then it's a no brainer - 5.0 all the way - bigger battery, bigger screen, better for serfing inet...
hanjosep said:
4.2 has omap processor while the 5.0 has exynos, which is slightly better even at the same clock rate. 4.2 has 2mp camera while the 5.0 has 3.2 or 5 in korean version. 5.0 has much better devving and rom choice and it also does fit in your pocket!
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks! but doesnt the 5.0 get annoying to carry around everywhere because im using it as a replacement for a phone (I dont have one)
apman112 said:
thanks! but doesnt the 5.0 get annoying to carry around everywhere because im using it as a replacement for a phone (I dont have one)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I take it with me everywhere, never annoying imho if you get used to the bulk, its easy to run around with it in your pocket. its a little hard to take it out of your pocket while sitting down because it gets caught. But it never fell out because of its size so its good if you go on a plane. If comfort and portability has higher priority than screen size, cm9 and custom roms then I guess 4.2 can serve better.
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
I have no experience with the 4.2 but I have the 5.0 and absolutely love it. I had an iPod before and it was certainly a shock to see how much bigger the 5.0 was but it only took me a day to get over it because that 5 inch screen more than makes up for it. I can't imagine how I used to look at a tiny 3.5 inch screen and didn't think it was too small. It fits in all of my jeans and jacket pockets without being overly bulky.
cheetos316 said:
..I can't imagine how I used to look at a tiny 3.5 inch screen and didn't think it was too small. It fits in all of my jeans and jacket pockets without being overly bulky.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, yeah it's funny how you get used to bigger screens, i had a similar experience, after using my gp 5.0 for a couple of days my phone's 3.8" screen seemed strangely small.
I know you are asking opinion on the 5.0 and the 4.2, but if you worry about the size but you still want the better performance and developpement on your device you can get the 4.0. It is exactly the same as the 5.0 but smaller. So you get the same performance and there is more developpement going than for the 4.2. Again this is just my opinion but I personnaly prefer the 4.0.
ti-pich said:
I know you are asking opinion on the 5.0 and the 4.2, but if you worry about the size but you still want the better performance and developpement on your device you can get the 4.0. It is exactly the same as the 5.0 but smaller. So you get the same performance and there is more developpement going than for the 4.2. Again this is just my opinion but I personnaly prefer the 4.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed... apman, why do want the 4.2 over the 4.0 anyway? Is there a limited choice?
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app
hanjosep said:
Agreed... apman, why do want the 4.2 over the 4.0 anyway? Is there a limited choice?
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well at least in my country ( Lithuania ) the 4.0 has been replaced with the more expensive 4.2. And you cant buy the 4.0 anymore.
gskillivenom said:
Well at least in my country ( Lithuania ) the 4.0 has been replaced with the more expensive 4.2. And you cant buy the 4.0 anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My suggestion is 5.0 ..i love this device..i have 4.0 inch android phone and when i am out i always use SGP ..i use phone just for phone and text..i dont now how much is in litvania but i bought mine new a year ago for 150 euros which is steal for me consider that at that time devices with that big screen costed 4 times more.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
I'd say get the 5.0. Its easy to get used to the large size and its still a very capable device. There's a lot of development for it and its pretty good for watching movies and playing games. I'm not sure about pricing where you live, but in the UK the nexus 7 and 5.0 are nearly the same price so you might want to consider the nexus 7, but for a smaller device, the 5.0 is great
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
If music playing is your thing, then I would recommend the 4.0 or 4.2 as those have the wolfson dacs. The 5.0 is yamaha. I believe the wolfson dac yields higher quality audio than the yamaha. YMMV
Do not forget the battery!
I own the 5.0 and it has a 2500 mAh Battery, 4.2 has 1500 mAh and 4.0 has 1200 mAh.
This is a big advantage for the 5.0 which can last longer.
zardak said:
Do not forget the battery!
I own the 5.0 and it has a 2500 mAh Battery, 4.2 has 1500 mAh and 4.0 has 1200 mAh.
This is a big advantage for the 5.0 which can last longer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use it on 1.5 ghz wich is bi overclock from 1ghz and battery and with 50% overclock last all day no problem.
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
Ok so I know I said that the 5.0 is a better option, but Amazon (at least Amazon UK) will start selling the 4.2 for only £70 (~$112) from 8:45pm GMT. Considering the RRP is something like £150, this is a really good deal so it might be better to get the 4.2 if you just want a cheap portable media player
Supermaster34 said:
Ok so I know I said that the 5.0 is a better option, but Amazon (at least Amazon UK) will start selling the 4.2 for only £70 (~$112) from 8:45pm GMT. Considering the RRP is something like £150, this is a really good deal so it might be better to get the 4.2 if you just want a cheap portable media player
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know the prices in your countries but here in Italy the 5.0 has a nice one: I bought it 3 months ago for €139 (~£112) but now I can find it for €129 (~£104) and i think is gonna be even more cheaper by year end.
Even if i could find the 4.2 for ~90€ I still would choose the 5.0.