Related
I am new to kernel development but would like to give it a try after closing my Portadroid development.
Just like to find out if anyone here would be interested to form a team with me to take on this challenge. But before that, I need some advice if there is really a need for a kernel specifically developed for SD/Ram build ROM since we have already a couple of NAND kernel that can work on SD ROM. Is there a big enough ROI for committing time on this?
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
boonbing said:
I am new to kernel development but would like to give it a try after closing my Portadroid development.
Just like to find out if anyone here would be interested to form a team with me to take on this challenge. But before that, I need some advice if there is really a need for a kernel specifically developed for SD/Ram build ROM since we have already a couple of NAND kernel that can work on SD ROM. Is there a big enough ROI for committing time on this?
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure ! We need SD build kernel seems the SD Build and Nand had different setting and u can see all my build still using hastarin 8.6 kernel that I find best suit to SD Build even the kernel already one years old
Will be nice if someone like u want to take this challenge welcome to SD Build section.
Send from my HD2 Bliss using XDA App
Hi boonbing
Now HTC Bravo – GB MR – 2.6.35 kernel source code comming
can fix Graffics glitches ... for HTC Sense New ?
http://htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
boxmax said:
Hi boonbing
Now HTC Bravo – GB MR – 2.6.35 kernel source code comming
can fix Graffics glitches ... for HTC Sense New ?
http://htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep... i want to know that too..
SD kernel
boonbing said:
I am new to kernel development but would like to give it a try after closing my Portadroid development.
Just like to find out if anyone here would be interested to form a team with me to take on this challenge. But before that, I need some advice if there is really a need for a kernel specifically developed for SD/Ram build ROM since we have already a couple of NAND kernel that can work on SD ROM. Is there a big enough ROI for committing time on this?
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering the great work you did with Portadroid I am sure you can
Contribute in the field of kernel development/improvement and even thou
Tytung and Warrenb -and others- are doing great work, some problems persist
and a fresh approach dedicated on SD kernel builds can only be welcomed.
Thanks and good luck.
boonbing said:
I am new to kernel development but would like to give it a try after closing my Portadroid development.
Just like to find out if anyone here would be interested to form a team with me to take on this challenge. But before that, I need some advice if there is really a need for a kernel specifically developed for SD/Ram build ROM since we have already a couple of NAND kernel that can work on SD ROM. Is there a big enough ROI for committing time on this?
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pleased heard of this. I think it is a good idea. currently only hastarin( https://gitorious.org/~hastarin/linux-on-wince-htc/hastarins-linux_on_wince_htc ) kernel and ACA hastrains (branch https://gitorious.org/~warrenb213/linux-on-wince-htc/warrenb213s-hastarins-linux_on_wince_htc ) supports both SD( boot from winmo) and Mag ( boot from Magldr for SD) boot.
now most others developing kernels such as tyt, raf and their clone branches etc don't support Mag (boot from Magldr for SD ROM). So a good idea for SD kernel is to continue hastrain kernel and add in all patches since he stopped.Only for SD boot type (SD/RAM/MAG) should be fine & No need to support magldr NAND/cLK. I'm learning and studying hastarin's repository. i'm a newbie for linux kernel. many things don't know lah and need to learn. lol.
Wow, this looks like dream team.. good luck guys and thank you.
3dak said:
pleased heard of this. I think it is a good idea. currently only hastarin( https://gitorious.org/~hastarin/linux-on-wince-htc/hastarins-linux_on_wince_htc ) kernel and ACA hastrains (branch https://gitorious.org/~warrenb213/linux-on-wince-htc/warrenb213s-hastarins-linux_on_wince_htc ) supports both SD( boot from winmo) and Mag ( boot from Magldr for SD) boot.
now most others developing kernels such as tyt, raf and their clone branches etc don't support Mag (boot from Magldr for SD ROM). So a good idea for SD kernel is to continue hastrain kernel and add in all patches since he stopped.Only for SD boot type (SD/RAM/MAG) should be fine & No need to support magldr NAND/cLK. I'm learning and studying hastarin's repository. i'm a newbie for linux kernel. many things don't know lah and need to learn. lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep ... looks like u are pointing the right direction keep it up !
he has released his 1st r1 kernel for his miui build
super 3dak
vua777 said:
he has released his 1st r1 kernel for his miui build
super 3dak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice May i ask where is the kernel Thread ?
Hope can be apply on Sense Build ..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1262860
This is great to heard sth like this might happen!!
Look forward to see any updates!!!a
Edit: Now CM7 is stable, can we plz get custom kernels
Old:
Kernel Devs refrain from making custom kernels for CM7 because the CM team asked them not to, in the alpha stage of the development.
Today i asked Atinm if he could give the green light to the Devs, he replied:
atinm said:
Actually, we don't care if people run other kernels. We just say that we will not debug other people's kernels - so if you have bugs, you go to the kernel developer's threads. Same as on the other Galaxy phones. And there is more chance of your phone being unstable with each nightly when you are on a different kernel and we change the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to all kernel Devs, if possible plz make custom kernels for CM7
Many thnx
ragiut1 said:
Kernel Devs refrain from making custom kernels for CM7 because the CM team asked them not to, in the alpha stage of the development.
Today i asked Atinm if he could give the green light to the Devs, he replied:
to all kernel Devs, if possible plz make custom kernels for CM7
Many thnx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have maked one ...
I just saw it
Thnx
not quite the place to post this but party on
I had scaling issues with the stock kernel so i'm looking forward to this.
Great to see this.
I have 2questions.
1. Once we have these kernels will we be be able to flash files to enable Samsung stuff like Samsung dive, camera etc
2. Will new kernels be able to incorporate files from stock rom to fix the Bluetooth issue.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
aalupatti said:
Great to see this.
I have 2questions.
1. Once we have these kernels will we be be able to flash files to enable Samsung stuff like Samsung dive, camera etc
2. Will new kernels be able to incorporate files from stock rom to fix the Bluetooth issue.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. No.
2. No. All coding at the moment. Atnim is waiting for the att gs2 source code at the moment.
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
Now CM7 is stable, can we plz get custom kernels
aalupatti said:
Great to see this.
2. Will new kernels be able to incorporate files from stock rom to fix the Bluetooth issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 7.1 Stable has working bluetooth, and it wasn't a kernel issue, it was a driver source problem, Cyanogen either cracked it ahead of everyone else, or, got access to the missing source code, either way, winning like Charlie Sheen.
I have added my i9100 CyanogenMod 7.1 kernel with BLN support.
Details available here.
ImWarped said:
CM 7.1 Stable has working bluetooth, and it wasn't a kernel issue, it was a driver source problem, Cyanogen either cracked it ahead of everyone else, or, got access to the missing source code, either way, winning like Charlie Sheen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, driver issues are not the same as the kernel.
I'd love to see some kernel supporting gpu oc-uv, it's a good feature for battery saving purposes imho.
vnvman said:
I'd love to see some kernel supporting gpu oc-uv, it's a good feature for battery saving purposes imho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use siyah kernel.
Sent from my GT-I9100
Right, first beta build will come soon, I am working on it.
To do:
Sync CM7 repository [x]
Compile CDMA CM7 with VMSPLIT_3G [x]
Modify Verizon kernel for miui [x - didn't work out so good]
Modified SEMC .145 kernel for MIUI (works with CDMA and GSM) and it boots MIUI (my GSM version of it) but there are a few graphical problems. If I can't solve this, then I will clean out defconfigs using fxp's as a base
Merge CM7 and MIUI into a ROM [not done]
Might need to hack RIL into framework [not done - might not be needed]
How you can help:
Click the thanks button, it will help me work towards getting recognition on xda.
I don't have an R800x, so testing will have to be done by you
CURRENT STATUS
I have successfully booted MIUI (GSM) on a R800x capable kernel, but there are graphical issues such as home screen not loading and other screens not loading. I am looking into a fix for this.
I'd love to have MIUI on my R800x. Greatly appreciated for when you make it happen!
CrimsonKnight13 said:
I'd love to have MIUI on my R800x. Greatly appreciated for when you make it happen!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quick question, do you know where freexperia post there CDMA CM7 kernel source?
But then as the Verizon ROM is true stock, I should be able to make an MIUI kernel easily.
Just looking for an MSM7x30 CDMA with MIUI now.
Will start porting kernel tomorrow.
Sent from my R800i using MIUI
KeiranFTW said:
Quick question, do you know where freexperia post there CDMA CM7 kernel source?
But then as the Verizon ROM is true stock, I should be able to make an MIUI kernel easily.
Just looking for an MSM7x30 CDMA with MIUI now.
Will start porting kernel tomorrow.
Sent from my R800i using MIUI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There should be source for stock 2.3.3
But I think FXP has sources on github.
Sent from R800x
Thank-you soo soo much! Ive wanted to try Miui since I got my first android phone, and have never had the chance. In any event, I truly appreciate the effort and moreover the thought.
Sent from my R800x using xda premium
KeiranFTW said:
Quick question, do you know where freexperia post there CDMA CM7 kernel source?
But then as the Verizon ROM is true stock, I should be able to make an MIUI kernel easily.
Just looking for an MSM7x30 CDMA with MIUI now.
Will start porting kernel tomorrow.
Sent from my R800i using MIUI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/freexperia/semc-kernel-msm7x30/tags
3.0.1.A.0.145.zip — Initial import of SEMC 3.0.1.A.0.145 ZIP TAR.GZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted a "bug" about the source not being there & they wound up saying to find it in the tags. I guess the whole semc-kernel-msm7x30 folder might be a fully updated kernel for CDMA & GSM.
Right, that is probably it then.
Just found out how to hack RIL into framework.jar if data does not work.
The only problem I had when porting the semc GSM kernel to MIUI was a few graphical glitches, so I used the freexperia one instead.
Sent from my R800i using MIUI
Hey, hope this works out, Keiran - we can always use another ROM to fool with. I very much anticipate good things here!
KeiranFTW said:
The R800x users seemed a little neglected to me, so I am going to try and port MIUI over to the R800x.
What I need to do:
Port MIUI from over to the R800x from either the desire HD or the Inspire 4G (Inspire has a CDMA radio?) or any other msm7x30 CDMA phone.
Port over stock kernel to MIUI.
Keiran
Sent from my R800i using MIUI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could try the evo shift 4g rom
Evo shift 4g runs similar specs (7x30 @ 1ghz) and is CDMA
If you need help with testing/development, i'm here
paxChristos said:
You could try the evo shift 4g rom
Evo shift 4g runs similar specs (7x30 @ 1ghz) and is CDMA
If you need help with testing/development, i'm here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, going to try that, just syncing (or attempting to sync) the CM7 repos so I can compile them to be MIUI compatible.
I'm willing to test it out as well.
CrimsonKnight13 said:
I'm willing to test it out as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got a few testers then.
Finally! The repo synced!
Now time to set up the build
KeiranFTW said:
Got a few testers then.
Finally! The repo synced!
Now time to set up the build
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am also willing to test
Leraeniesh said:
Am also willing to test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, got plenty of testers now.
Right, doing a nandroid backup, then going to flash CDMA kernel and rom to set up build environment.
Then going to compile with VMSPLIT_3G
EDIT:
Have flashed CDMA kernel and CDMA CM7 on my R800i, going to set up CM7 build environment for R800x then compile with VMSPLIT_3G
And now I am compiling CyanogenMod with VMSPLIT_3G for the R800x
hoping it does not error out :O
Now, for the kernel
Id like to test also!!!!
If it works can you compile cm9?
Sent from my R800x using XDA App
anyone know how to resolve this error:
make: *** No rule to make target `out/target/product/zeusc/kernel', needed by `out/target/product/zeusc/boot.img'. Stop.
it is stopping me from compiling....
Keiran
I belive it says that there are no building instructions for the kernel.
HearthC0re said:
I belive it says that there are no building instructions for the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trying to recompile with built in kernel source, will let you know how it goes.
Whoa... seems to work now, fluke of the year imo.
Never compiled with any Unix system, or make for that matter.
Love my Analytic Thought patterns though Oo
Can you put a quick summary to differentiate each ICS rom?
ICS and CM9 is obvious but how about
Bytecode VS williamcharles AOKP VS aspee AOSP
and
hephappy (now Arjen) CM9 VS lupohirp CM9
valent|n0 said:
Can you put a quick summary to differentiate each ICS rom?
ICS and CM9 is obvious but how about
Bytecode VS williamcharles AOKP VS aspee AOSP
and
hephappy (now Arjen) CM9 VS lupohirp CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The base rom is ofc cm9 for all other roms..... Other developers used the necessary sources needed for porting those ROMs from lupohirp's cm9.
And, lupohirp, arjen and hep happy work on same project together. If they separately release their ROM, it doesn't mean its a different work, its in fact continuation of other team members' work..........
Byte code's Gummy rom is a customized version of ICS, with more features added by different developers........
William Charle's AOKP is too a highly customized version of ICS, with tons of changes and additions......Too much to post here!!
Aspee ported CNA, not aosp. CNA is again a modded and customized version of AOSP ICS.....
BUT FOR ALL OF THESE, THE BASE IS CM9 ...............
You can always google about these roms......
Hope this clears you.............
Sent from heaven, wandering with Steve Jobs
D3oDex3D_AyusH said:
The base rom is ofc cm9 for all other roms..... Other developers used the necessary sources needed for porting those ROMs from lupohirp's cm9.
And, lupohirp, arjen and hep happy work on same project together. If they separately release their ROM, it doesn't mean its a different work, its in fact continuation of other team members' work..........
Byte code's port of Gummy rom is a customized version of ICS, with more features added by different developers........
William Charle's port of AOKP is too a highly customized version of cm9, with tons of changes and additions......
Aspee ported CNA, not aosp. CNA is again a modded and customized version of AOSP ICS.....
BUT FOR ALL OF THESE, THE BASE IS CM9 ...............
You can always google about these roms......
Hope this clears you.............
Sent from heaven, wandering with Steve Jobs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who said Gummy, AOKP, and CNA are BASED on CM9??
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
dont misguide people by saying aokp and gummy are based on cm9..both are based on aosp..
all the ics rom share the same device,vendor and kernel tree with modifications pertaining to individual team...
when you say this rom is based on that rom, it means that you have ported the rom. here we have built from original sources.
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2
D3oDex3D_AyusH said:
The base rom is ofc cm9 for all other roms..... Other developers used the necessary sources needed for porting those ROMs from lupohirp's cm9.
And, lupohirp, arjen and hep happy work on same project together. If they separately release their ROM, it doesn't mean its a different work, its in fact continuation of other team members' work..........
Byte code's port of Gummy rom is a customized version of ICS, with more features added by different developers........
William Charle's port of AOKP is too a highly customized version of cm9, with tons of changes and additions......
Aspee ported CNA, not aosp. CNA is again a modded and customized version of AOSP ICS.....
BUT FOR ALL OF THESE, THE BASE IS CM9 ...............
You can always google about these roms......
Hope this clears you.............
Sent from heaven, wandering with Steve Jobs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know anything but like to talk a lot!
I think what he meant is all rom use vendor folder from CM9
RockR172 said:
Who said Gummy, AOKP, and CNA are BASED on CM9??
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
williamcharles said:
dont misguide people by saying aokp and gummy are based on cm9..both are based on aosp..
all the ics rom share the same device,vendor and kernel tree with modifications pertaining to individual team...
when you say this rom is based on that rom, it means that you have ported the rom. here we have built from original sources.
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SH!T SH!T AND SH!T!!!
Whose is misguiding people!!
By base I meant USING lupo, arjen and hephappy's cm9 sources for FIXING major bugs in your ROMs before building. Didn't you guys inclu their camera and tons of other fixes in your respective builds??
I know the common things in all ICS Roms, but the OP questioning here doesn't!! What if you say a newb--- This/that from has tons of mods in its core framework and jars, it's kernel has bacported KGSL drivers, it has a new touch screen driver, has KSM support, has bash, nano, etc etc....??!!
I JUST TALKED IN COMMON LANGUAGE FOR NON-DEVELOPERS!! EVERYONE HERE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE VENDOR, DEVICE FOLDERS AND RELATED GIT JARGON!! DONT GET IT WRONG PLZ.!!!
thachtunganh said:
Don't know anything but like to talk a lot!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Respect you, but didn't expect this. Double reading posts and getting all its possible meanings before posting anything is what I prefer...........Don't know about you....... ..
xuanduc987 said:
I think what he meant is all rom use vendor folder from CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least someone got the sense here........
Any chance for working "Phone.apk" when DPI is 145,150, 155 etc.?
All ROM look better with smaller DPI.
_____________________
Swypnięte z LG-P500 przy użyciu Tapatalk'a
sQuAshPL said:
Any chance for working "Phone.apk" when DPI is 145,150, 155 etc.?
All ROM look better with smaller DPI.
_____________________
Swypnięte z LG-P500 przy użyciu Tapatalk'a
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is a phone.apk posted by cure25 that works with lower dpi. it is in aokp thread
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2
is there major differences between (GUI and function wise)
arjen , hephappy and williamcharles as it currently sits right now?
how about performance wise? between arjen, hephappy and williamcharles?
is there major differences?
valent|n0 said:
is there major differences between (GUI and function wise)
arjen , hephappy and williamcharles as it currently sits right now?
how about performance wise? between arjen, hephappy and williamcharles?
is there major differences?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man!!! Pls don't do this... asking these type of questions will only lead to unnecessary arguments...
plus, it is forbidden!!! As by the mods.
If u read some posts of individual rom's thread, u will definitely know the difference n what rom is capable of doing what... no offence pls.
Sent from my LG-P500 using CM9
kiraXce said:
Man!!! Pls don't do this... asking these type of questions will only lead to unnecessary arguments...
plus, it is forbidden!!! As by the mods.
If u read some posts of individual rom's thread, u will definitely know the difference n what rom is capable of doing what... no offence pls.
Sent from my LG-P500 using CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Do the testing by urself and decide that is the best method...plus read all those respective threads and you'll understand what is this and that
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA
RockR172 said:
Who said Gummy, AOKP, and CNA are BASED on CM9??
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe yeah,
One word on my mind:
"Facepalm"
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
To add on to mdroid's. Seriously u think aokp and aosp are based on cm9?!
This is a discussion and information thread for the progress of stock based rom development.
I want to keep you up to date for the current development progress and invite you to join or discuss about new projects.
First I want to introduce to you the people who are involved in this current project.
Hashcode (STS-Dev-Team)
Deveshmanish
Ravikirancg
alteredlikeness
Biotik
Each one here is working on its own projects, but we are statically in contact to help out each other, so this has some kind of a team character. But this is NOT something like a "closed team"! Everybody, every dev and everyone who wants is invited to be part of this new fast progressing kind of development for Roms, Kernels and all other Android stuff. I think we should not longer stay alone with our stuff because we can reach our goals much faster when working together - or at least being in contact and share our knowledge!
In example the last weeks have been full of success regarding to Kexec-, Kernel- and Stock-based development - with the big help of the people mentioned above!
Current Progress
Yesterday we made it to boot Catalyst Rom (VZW .16 - based) on my GSM device with full working service - with the first stock Kexec kernel! This opens many new possibilities and brings our good old Razr on a new level - AGAIN!
Now we have a working kexec setup for stock based roms and I made a GSM- and a CDMA-Patch, so all users - no matter what region their devices are from - can run all stock-based rom - also no matter which stock kernel they have installed on their devices!
First, I will release a "Kexec-Patch" which can be flashed over ANY Stock-based rom to boot it on ANY device - including the needed network patches! The kernel has been finished and I will release it tonight. Note that this kernel is not modified in a way like JBX-Kernel! It is a copy of stock kernel which was made ready for kexec by the STS-Dev-Team!
Next, we make a Custom-Kernel for stock-based roms with mods like JBX-Kernel! The first Rom to run with it will be Catalyst v3!
We don't want to keep our work only for our projects - everyone should have access to it! Each dev should be able to use it for his work! It's free and open source - and it should behandled like this!
Devs are invited to join our group hangouts on Google Plus! Together we will make fast progress in all kind of development! PM me for access!
I will keep you up to date in this thread!
- reserved -
Excellent news! I was wondering, when you said full working service, did that happen to include 1080p video and HDMI? I know the other kexec Roms have these issues.
Regardless of my question, truly amazing work.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
jessel0001 said:
Excellent news! I was wondering, when you said full working service, did that happen to include 1080p video and HDMI? I know the other kexec Roms have these issues.
Regardless of my question, truly amazing work.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On kexec stock the camera seems working fully, yes. But service meant to be Networks.
so... in near future with the "new" kexec + f.e. cm 10.1 and we have everything working ?? or it will only fully work with 4.1.2 firmware... ??
Great ideea !
Thank you
The camera only works fine for Stock based roms because it uses the original cam libs. But we cannot use the cam libs on AOSP roms! Tghe cam drivers are partly closed source, that's what makes it difficult. But Hashcode is working on that.
Edit: Just released the patches, see dev section.
Ok new guy here.... What the he!! is the difference in kexec and catalyst can someone explain all this to me easily?? Im coming from a gnexus and have know idea what this really means. I gather it a good thing for all of us but it's all very confusing to me still. So for being the noob!!!!
Sent from my XT912 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
So if I flash the Patch on CM 10.1 or AOKP, the camera will not recording in Full HD?
justen7723 said:
Ok new guy here.... What the he!! is the difference in kexec and catalyst can someone explain all this to me easily?? Im coming from a gnexus and have know idea what this really means. I gather it a good thing for all of us but it's all very confusing to me still. So for being the noob!!!!
Sent from my XT912 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kexec is a method to bypass our Razr's locked bootloader and run Custom Kernels.
The main problem with the locked bootloader is that we cannot reun custom kernels - usually. And also we cannot use any stock kernel - i.e. when a GSM user wants to use a stock-based CDMA Custom rom he used to wipe the CID (region check) to be able to flash the CDMA kernel which is needed to run this. But thanks to the secure version which are being checked by bootloader users who have updated to Moto official JB cannot flash the VZW kernel anymore - so they cannot use the CDMA roms!
Now we have KExec! This allows us to run any rom on a custom kernel! The metnioned problems are history now.
But besides of that it allows us to run JB AOSP Roms on Custom Kernels - just like my JBX-Kernel.
You are coming from G-Nex? Well, you might know how many kernels are available for G-Nex - and what nice features they provide (OC, GPU OC, BLX, BLN, etc, etc..). My JBX-Kernel provides a lot of these features to the Razr owners All that wouldn't be possible without kexec.
rhyrlix said:
So if I flash the Patch on CM 10.1 or AOKP, the camera will not recording in Full HD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO! And I explained the reason already. PLEASE FORGET THAT VERY FAST!
And about the battery consumption? After flashed the patch, the battery life will be bad like CM 10.1 and AOKP?
rhyrlix said:
And about the battery consumption? After flashed the patch, the battery life will be bad like CM 10.1 and AOKP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, it will be like stock.
I need someones help! I have to rebuild the moto_crypto module to make the JBX-Stock-Kernel working on VZW-Based Roms!
But I am not really aware of shell script language. Could someone please tell me how to link the Makefile(s), etc to connect this module source to the kernel source?
Or at least read the build script you find in the linked source and tell me what exactly is set there (I understand most parts - but not enough)
https://github.com/dtrail/kernel_mapphone_kexec/tree/stock-mod/motorola/security/moto_crypto
Ediot: Nevermind, got it.
Question, using Motorola stock kernel is better than a custom one right? I know it may be stepping your heart dtrail, I experience certain reboot a day due to dos, so in order to get boot again, I will have to flash your kernel again. It is quite annoying indeed. Such problem does not exist in stock rom. You know, I choose Motorola because I trust in its built quality, I trust in its stability.
Apart from that, the new progress mentioned here means we can use Motorola kernel to run any aosp rom, am I figure out in the right track?
Thank you so much!
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
h0324879 said:
Question, using Motorola stock kernel is better than a custom one right? I know it may be stepping your heart dtrail, I experience certain reboot a day due to dos, so in order to get boot again, I will have to flash your kernel again. It is quite annoying indeed. Such problem does not exist in stock rom. You know, I choose Motorola because I trust in its built quality, I trust in its stability.
Apart from that, the new progress mentioned here means we can use Motorola kernel to run any aosp rom, am I figure out in the right track?
Thank you so much!
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You misunderstood. Please read the OP more carefully - I explained that question several times now (regarding to the benefits of the current kernel)
To your problem: I don't have that problem. My phone runs multiple days (until 1 week) without any problems (and not a single reboot). And for me the custom kernel is much better than stock because I get better battery life, performance and options. Many users reported the same in the kernel thread. So yours must be a device related or usage related problem.
I don't know your settings, so I cannot help you with that. You can do tjat: Make screenshots from all Trickster Mod pages that I can see your settings.
Although I'm using a Razr XT912,I'm so glad seeing all these development goin' so fast. Thanks a lot,dtrail1. You've been doing a great job for XT910 users especially this Razr community in general. I've been in love with your JBX kernel.
Sent from my XT897 using Tapatalk 2
Little update
Currently fixing 4.3 JBX. This could take some more time than thought before..But it will work, that's the most important thing now.
The Stock Core Kernel which is a direct JBX port for Stock based roms is almost finished! I will launch a testing phase this week.
MIUI is kind of special - who knows ? Actually I can boot and run the Stock Core kernel with it but the UI is kind of slow. The log is telling me nothing so I have to dig deeper.
But because I am working on all of these projects on my own it will take time. Be patient and stay tuned!
Besides of the Kernel(s) I am working together with Biotik on Catalyst Project and also currently merging STS-Dev-Team's progress on the completely rebuilt 3.0.31 and 3.0.88 Kernel....Great things are coming, yes! But I have to be on my own - Seems like that!
I am still waiting for someone's contribution into my projects - but also loosing hope slowly...
Thanks man
Is it possible to download it yet?