So I've been unable to get higher benchmarks than what I've attached. I know its not really a way to judge my phone, but rather me being curious. How are people getting such high scores on their rezounds? I'm currently running CleanROM 4.1 and loving every bit of it. Let me know what your scores are and what you've done to get those scores.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
the highest score i ever got was 7200 on BAMF ICS v1.1 with SebastianFM's kernel.
jchammer123 said:
So I've been unable to get higher benchmarks than what I've attached. I know its not really a way to judge my phone, but rather me being curious. How are people getting such high scores on their rezounds? I'm currently running CleanROM 4.1 and loving every bit of it. Let me know what your scores are and what you've done to get those scores.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a very similar score the first time I ran Antutu with CleanRom 4.1 (in the mid 3000's). I tried it again a few days later, not having changed anything in particular and got a 6276. So I'm not sure why there was a 3000+ point discrepency.
I've tried it a couple times and its consistantly in the 3000 range. I've never seen even remotely close to 7000 on my Rezound no matter what Rom I was running, lol.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
those benchmarking apps are inaccurate and useless. tried running twice back to back. first over 7000 then just barely 3500. total waste of time
dyetheskin said:
those benchmarking apps are inaccurate and useless. tried running twice back to back. first over 7000 then just barely 3500. total waste of time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I know they're not accurate, but until I have a better way to test it, I use em for the hell of it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
im also getting crap benchmarks on any gb kernel i try, doesn't make sense for a dual core device.
I've been hitting around 6k with Antutu.
I mostly use it as a comparison to my old Inctedible though...this phone is super smooth, so I don't really care what the benchmark says!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
what are you guys getting with cf-bench and the updated quadrant?
leroybrute said:
what are you guys getting with cf-bench and the updated quadrant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been getting decent scores with quadrant, but they haven't updated the list of devices so its hard to have anything to compare it to. I haven't tried the other one.
Also, I know there's a difference, but I get scores in the high 8000s with my Xoom overclocked to 1.5 ghz, but only 3000s with my Rezound clocked at 1.5 ghz as well.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
This has been discussed in Sebastians thread. It has to do w/ an issue with mpdecision. Besides benchmarks mean nothing!
All Day
I consistently get over 7000 when I run Antutu. Overclocked to 1.834 on cleanrom 4.3
I get close to 3000 with Quadrant...but I only really use it to see if new tweaks help or hurt.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Related
I keep getting poor scores on linpack for android. At stock speeds im around 12-15 mflops, and when overclocked to 1.8 ghz it max out at around 18-19. Apparently the evo 3d should be able to hit in the 100's, so whats wrong with mine? I also used setcpu to set it on performance so its always running at max frequency.
bavman said:
I keep getting poor scores on linpack for android. At stock speeds im around 12-15 mflops, and when overclocked to 1.8 ghz it max out at around 18-19. Apparently the evo 3d should be able to hit in the 100's, so whats wrong with mine? I also used setcpu to set it on performance so its always running at max frequency.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Defective unit.
Virus!
Run virus scan! Omg Trojan!
sent from a 3devo
are you using multi thread?
The dual-core processor isn't designed to run at max frequency at the same time all the time, hence the low scores. We have an acentric processor on our hands, so that's part of the reason the scores r low.
Also, you are mist likely bot running the multi-thread option, which nets me around 50-65.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
How does it get into the 100s?
Linpack has never really been reliable for me.
Run some scores on an unrooted phone.
Most I've gotten in a Multi Thread run is 73, I am usually around 60-65.
At 1.8ghz I get between 88-92
Someone with an 3VO posted a Linpack score of 200! That's the highest score I've ever seen.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
jlevy73 said:
At 1.8ghz I get between 88-92
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1, same here.
My ''xDU4L C0R3 SH00T3Rx'' shot you down in 3D!
linpack quadcore etc etc = http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4NgDPOxb7jY/TPOZe37Ue1I/AAAAAAAAAGM/NeJohQYLjf0/s1600/11981_2_9_2008_10_43_00_PM_-_oh_****-759720.jpg
bavman said:
I keep getting poor scores on linpack for android. At stock speeds im around 12-15 mflops, and when overclocked to 1.8 ghz it max out at around 18-19. Apparently the evo 3d should be able to hit in the 100's, so whats wrong with mine? I also used setcpu to set it on performance so its always running at max frequency.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was this after you dropped your phone from a ten story building?
Seriously though, your phone is messed up.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
seriously, to be honest, all that matters is what your phone can do and how fast it can handle graphics, apps, etc...not how high an app says...this site is really pissing me off lately, sorry guys between things like this, benchmarks, r00t now?, idk anymore. seriously this is redic...sorry not directed at you OP
bavman said:
I keep getting poor scores on linpack for android. At stock speeds im around 12-15 mflops, and when overclocked to 1.8 ghz it max out at around 18-19. Apparently the evo 3d should be able to hit in the 100's, so whats wrong with mine? I also used setcpu to set it on performance so its always running at max frequency.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird, I am getting the same scores as you mention. Running stock unrooted rom. I know this can't be right as my OG EVO scored in the 30's.
Would like to know why it works for some people and not others?
Update...I just ran quadrant to see what I would get with that and it was about 1750 which I think is about right. Went back to run linpack and now I am getting scores in the 60's. Maybe quadrant woke something up. Lol
200 Linpack
That was before the Linpack update. I popped a 220 or some BS. Some of those scores are still posted on their website. They are bogus. The highest I have hit legit is 93. OC'd to 1.8 But Linpack is inconsistent as hell. I routinely get high 70's low 80's as well.
Randy D said:
That was before the Linpack update. I popped a 220 or some BS. Some of those scores are still posted on their website. They are bogus. The highest I have hit legit is 93. OC'd to 1.8 But Linpack is inconsistent as hell. I routinely get high 70's low 80's as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just hit 99.333 check recent posts.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Im new to this phone, came from the incredible, on that phone i could clock sense 1.075 and aosp 1.113. What is a safe speed that is stable on this phone? Thanks for the help!
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Safe is stock clock speeds. Overclock is different for each individual device produced. Only way to find your devices limits is to test them carefully.
I OC'd up to 1.5 for a while but honestly, I barely saw an appreciable difference in performance
it was pretty stable though!
I've been using setCPU to underclock while the screen is off and keep the speed from dropping under .7 while the screen is on, but not OCing at all...stable, snappy, and I'm getting a few extra battery hours to boot.
Thanks for the replies, ill play around with it.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
I've took mine to 1.9
Luke
pointless to OC. i am under-clocking at 768mhz max/245mhz min lagfree and is flies
I ocd, then backed it down to normal. The difference in speed was minimal, difference in battery was muy grande!
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
1.2 is probably a safe speed for most tbolts. I personally don't oc though. No need.
Sent from my HTC ThunderBolt powered by KillaSense 3.6
as stated above there really isn't any performance gain when overclocking I ran at 1.6 for a few days and never noticed a difference so i dropped it back to normal and again noticed no change. I think the real gains in performance are made by installing a rom.
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Whoa...a lotof views,,but nut sure either
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
I don't think I have an answer, but you have to ask a question before you get an answer.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
takota6 said:
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was running newts rls1 and getting 3600 quadrant and 6500+ antutu. When I switched to rls3 everything went down...so back to rls1 for me.
Other people have pointed out and I find this to work, that if you use setcpu and check "enable profiles", the 2nd core is turned on. I went ahead and set a screen off profile of 192/192 (max/min). I"m experimenting with these values, though. It seems I can knock down my mA use (per Battery Monitor Widget) by using the profile. The cpu does appear to be scaling properly. Many people have said not to use any of these cpu things and I did have some trouble with setcpu previously but it seems to be doing its thing with RLS1 anyway.
takota6 said:
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Programs probably just are't reading it right.
Speaking generally, the 2nd core will sit idle until needed, so it may be 'offline' when those apps check.
Until we get custom kernels/kernel source, there isn't much that can be done about it.
Sent from my evolving Rezound.
Lunatic summed it up perfectly. There are 2 cores, but the applications can't "see" them
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1496934 If you read through this thread the OP talks about the mpdecision not working properly. Basically it's the file that governs when both cores are on etc. It is something that can affect synthetic benches, but not real world performance. Probably why current ****s given by HTC = 0. Quadrant = trash and benches are for jerking off to numbers which generally is not an indicative to device performance. But whatever floats your boat I suppose .
Kool txs every1,,and I do use benchmarks to how my current Rom or tweak us working,,most of us are visual and need a program to tell us how it is..but I'm glad there s alot of hardcore peps to do the schooling
Perflock. There is no CPU management. Using setcpu doesn't do anything...its all in your head.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
It's like using a condom with a hole in it. There's no purpose for it, it'll only cause problems or children.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
If you use setcpu or similar and change pretty much any settings it should force the second core to do work.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
Like a couple others have said kernel source is the answer
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
A somewhat minor issue, but has anyone else had a score of 0 on their Antutu benchmark related to the sd card read and write speeds?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Hm. Does this depend on it being found at /mnt/sdcard/external_sd? Because it looks like they changed it to /storage/external_SD in the update. It's not accessible at /mnt/sdcard/external_sd.
Why do you when care about antutu? Does it make you proud if your phone scores high or sad when it scores low?
Not trying to be a **** but cave care less about my antutu score or anyone else. I just care about how my phone feels in my hand. I like a combination of performance n battery life. Cause the way my phone is set up ib score low but the phone is smooth as better n I can go all day on a single charge.
FYI: last time I checked I had the top score got are device on antutu. I ran the test to check if my kernel mods made a difference.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
MysteryEmotionz said:
Why do you when care about antutu? Does it make you proud if your phone scores high or sad when it scores low?
Not trying to be a **** but cave care less about my antutu score or anyone else. I just care about how my phone feels in my hand. I like a combination of performance n battery life. Cause the way my phone is set up ib score low but the phone is smooth as better n I can go all day on a single charge.
FYI: last time I checked I had the top score got are device on antutu. I ran the test to check if my kernel mods made a difference.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just wanted to know why it was doing it.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
I flashed some of chaotic weaponry stweaks profile and did this benchmark to see what I get. Is my phone fast ? Can it be faster? Just wondering
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
What was the score prior to flashing the tweaks, and does your phone feel faster after flashing the tweaks?
The note 2 can benchmark way higher than that. However I prefer smoothness and battery efficiency..
People actually care about benchmark scores?
shrike1978 said:
People actually care about benchmark scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol my thought exactly. These days, it's all about the software. Worrying about hardware speed is a thing of the past.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2