I keep getting poor scores on linpack for android. At stock speeds im around 12-15 mflops, and when overclocked to 1.8 ghz it max out at around 18-19. Apparently the evo 3d should be able to hit in the 100's, so whats wrong with mine? I also used setcpu to set it on performance so its always running at max frequency.
bavman said:
I keep getting poor scores on linpack for android. At stock speeds im around 12-15 mflops, and when overclocked to 1.8 ghz it max out at around 18-19. Apparently the evo 3d should be able to hit in the 100's, so whats wrong with mine? I also used setcpu to set it on performance so its always running at max frequency.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Defective unit.
Virus!
Run virus scan! Omg Trojan!
sent from a 3devo
are you using multi thread?
The dual-core processor isn't designed to run at max frequency at the same time all the time, hence the low scores. We have an acentric processor on our hands, so that's part of the reason the scores r low.
Also, you are mist likely bot running the multi-thread option, which nets me around 50-65.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
How does it get into the 100s?
Linpack has never really been reliable for me.
Run some scores on an unrooted phone.
Most I've gotten in a Multi Thread run is 73, I am usually around 60-65.
At 1.8ghz I get between 88-92
Someone with an 3VO posted a Linpack score of 200! That's the highest score I've ever seen.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
jlevy73 said:
At 1.8ghz I get between 88-92
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1, same here.
My ''xDU4L C0R3 SH00T3Rx'' shot you down in 3D!
linpack quadcore etc etc = http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4NgDPOxb7jY/TPOZe37Ue1I/AAAAAAAAAGM/NeJohQYLjf0/s1600/11981_2_9_2008_10_43_00_PM_-_oh_****-759720.jpg
bavman said:
I keep getting poor scores on linpack for android. At stock speeds im around 12-15 mflops, and when overclocked to 1.8 ghz it max out at around 18-19. Apparently the evo 3d should be able to hit in the 100's, so whats wrong with mine? I also used setcpu to set it on performance so its always running at max frequency.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was this after you dropped your phone from a ten story building?
Seriously though, your phone is messed up.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
seriously, to be honest, all that matters is what your phone can do and how fast it can handle graphics, apps, etc...not how high an app says...this site is really pissing me off lately, sorry guys between things like this, benchmarks, r00t now?, idk anymore. seriously this is redic...sorry not directed at you OP
bavman said:
I keep getting poor scores on linpack for android. At stock speeds im around 12-15 mflops, and when overclocked to 1.8 ghz it max out at around 18-19. Apparently the evo 3d should be able to hit in the 100's, so whats wrong with mine? I also used setcpu to set it on performance so its always running at max frequency.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird, I am getting the same scores as you mention. Running stock unrooted rom. I know this can't be right as my OG EVO scored in the 30's.
Would like to know why it works for some people and not others?
Update...I just ran quadrant to see what I would get with that and it was about 1750 which I think is about right. Went back to run linpack and now I am getting scores in the 60's. Maybe quadrant woke something up. Lol
200 Linpack
That was before the Linpack update. I popped a 220 or some BS. Some of those scores are still posted on their website. They are bogus. The highest I have hit legit is 93. OC'd to 1.8 But Linpack is inconsistent as hell. I routinely get high 70's low 80's as well.
Randy D said:
That was before the Linpack update. I popped a 220 or some BS. Some of those scores are still posted on their website. They are bogus. The highest I have hit legit is 93. OC'd to 1.8 But Linpack is inconsistent as hell. I routinely get high 70's low 80's as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just hit 99.333 check recent posts.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Related
Hey there i was just curious to see if people could post some screenshots of their Linpack scores on here. I read in another thread that 97 or so was the highest but i achieved over 98. Just wondering if anyone else is getting around the same? OCed or not? I held down my score as i took the screen shot. So my highest score is the highlighted green. Not too bad. It ranked 1100 or so out of all devices. Im thinking that is pretty badass for a phone that doesnt yet have a slimed down custom rom on it. I do have it OCed to 1.8ghz.
how in the hell did you pull that off? max I get is 60 mflop and 2500 quadrant on 1.8 ghz
sEnt to yoV from anOther d3mensiDn
you sure your overclock'd, you should be hittimg ~70 bone stock multithread.
pazookie said:
how in the hell did you pull that off? max I get is 60 mflop and 2500 quadrant on 1.8 ghz
sEnt to yoV from anOther d3mensiDn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well at first I was getting about 70 then I started tweeking things and making sure all my apps were killed. Took awhile to even break 90. But it kept creeping up.
Shoooooot!
Anyone else?
Shoooooot!
Do you mean EVO 3D? Just calling it the EVO leads to a lot of confusion
pazookie said:
how in the hell did you pull that off? max I get is 60 mflop and 2500 quadrant on 1.8 ghz
sEnt to yoV from anOther d3mensiDn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you update linpak and test multi thread
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
I pulled a 102.658. Ill put a pic up, if you promise not to laugh at me for not knowing how to use drocap right.
I cant get above 45 stock
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
I got 96.106 as my highest. I seem to average between 85-90 though.
I usually get just south of 70 stock multi-threaded after killing all active apps (ATK). Running Linpack now im getting around 50 with whatever is in the background that is running.
Thanks for everyones responses. I was just having mixed thoughts.
Shoooooot!
I've hit 68 stock, 92 @ 1728.
73 stock, 96 oc.
edit: Just got 99.333, beat that ;-)
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
So I am working on undervolting the atrix, and right now its stable with a -500mV setting to the 216, 456, 608, and 750MHz speeds. Why is the stock voltage set so high?
I noticed that also.....kinda crazy.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
What, other phones usually run much lower?
Viamonte said:
What, other phones usually run much lower?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im not sure, but its just that it is stable at much lower speeds then the stock settings
Viamonte said:
What, other phones usually run much lower?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly I forgot the exact amount my sgs ran at but I could UV it by like -125, -100, and -50 from slowest to fastest so -500 seems like a pretty extreme UV...its like 60-70% undervoltage...
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
xnickx5757 said:
So I am working on undervolting the atrix, and right now its stable with a -500mV setting to the 216, 456, 608, and 750MHz speeds. Why is the stock voltage set so high?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you should go compare the values of other tegra 2 devices to see if it's common across tegra or specific to the atrix. That's first place to start.
But yes that is amazing that you got -500 mV stable.
PM me if you need some other tegra 2 repository links.
Why htc evo 3d is 1.2 ghz when the MSM8660 is 1.5 ghz natively?
And if i'll overclock it to 1.5 ghz the processor will have less life?
Thanks.
The 3vo is an overall less stable phone so if they set it any higher it might as well be a brick
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
every one of my current kernels run the cpu @ the qualcomm spec'ed speed by default
for the 3d, it is 1.51GHz
not 1 person has had an issue with this... and stability is solid
Its not uncommon for manufacturer to underclock processors for overall performance improvement and battery life.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
megabiteg said:
Its not uncommon for manufacturer to underclock processors for overall performance improvement and battery life.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They do it for stability and to keep heat down along with battery life in mind
Same goes for all CPU or video cards for the pc or laptops heat and stability . It's what ran best at the factory when it was designed .
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
So i can overclock it to 1.5 ghz but it will have less life time.
LoKKeR said:
So i can overclock it to 1.5 ghz but it will have less life time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can do what you want man lol just the more you up the CPU the more battery it will use also if you don't do it right it can burn it up. So just be careful .
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
if you look at qualcomm`s website you will notice that they state that it is clocked at 1.5ghz. I have been running it and it reduces lag with minimal battery drain. because it was built to clock at 1.5ghz it will run at optimal efficiency at this speed. what causes instability is over and under volting.
jwolf1 said:
The 3vo is an overall less stable phone so if they set it any higher it might as well be a brick
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know where you get your info from about the 3VO being an already unstable phone to begin with, and setting it to manufacturer standards will only make the phone a "brick."
I really hope that was a troll post and not from a real 3VO owner.
Most ROMS you find, O/C to 1.5ghz anyway. Stability? Pffft.
mmmm.. i can't understand you. please write english a little better. Anyway if i'll set the cpu to 1.5ghz i don't ruin it right? It will not have a lesser life right? Because it's 1.5 ghz native.
LoKKeR said:
mmmm.. i can't understand you. please write english a little better. Anyway if i'll set the cpu to 1.5ghz i don't ruin it right? It will not have a lesser life right? Because it's 1.5 ghz native.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock speed is what it was designed for . I wouldn't mess with things. You can if you want but whenever you bump the CPU up it does tend to use more battery among heat.
Sent from the Reaper
LoKKeR said:
mmmm.. i can't understand you. please write english a little better. Anyway if i'll set the cpu to 1.5ghz i don't ruin it right? It will not have a lesser life right? Because it's 1.5 ghz native.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its rated for 1.5ghz -on the reference system-, if a builder make a system which dont follow reference board specifics it has to adjust something to make for it, in this case clock speed.
as generally builder are required to leave a lot of leeway in their specs you shouldnt have problems, just a processor a bit warmer than what specs require and which use more battery than for htc specs.
yet keep in mind that you arent using it as for -htc- specs (which supersedes the cpu maker) so you arent covered by warranty if something goes wrong.
LoKKeR said:
mmmm.. i can't understand you. please write english a little better. Anyway if i'll set the cpu to 1.5ghz i don't ruin it right? It will not have a lesser life right? Because it's 1.5 ghz native.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running my EVO at 1.5ghz for 2 months now, and I dont experience any of the mentioned issues, NO extra heat.(maybe because of the winter temperature ), NO battery drains.
Remember that there is a cpu governor which manages the cpu ghz as per the use demands.
Hope this will satisfy your concerns.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using XDA
jacobsaleh said:
I'm running my EVO at 1.5ghz for 2 months now, and I dont experience any of the mentioned issues, NO extra heat.(maybe because of the winter temperature ), NO battery drains.
Remember that there is a cpu governor which manages the cpu ghz as per the use demands.
Hope this will satisfy your concerns.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol I agree cause of the winter... Tho the kernel depends on who messed with it some folks tweak things and other can tweak it to run all the time at a certain speed which isn't good to do all the time..
ya i think HTC did it just to squeeze some more life out of these batteries.
Mmmm... Ok that's right. But you haven't answered to my question >.< Overclock to 1.5 Ghz will ruin the cpu?? Will have the cpu less life time?
LoKKeR said:
Mmmm... Ok that's right. But you haven't answered to my question >.< Overclock to 1.5 Ghz will ruin the cpu?? Will have the cpu less life time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
There ya go.
It's possibile that gpu can be bricked?! With anthrax kernel.
No
#Root-Hack_Mod*Always\
how do you know? will you refound him if you are wrong?
dont just give false assurance if you cant put your money were you put your mouth..
1.2 ghz are what the hardware designer set as specs, anything else is a risk - minimal but still there is a chance that something will go wrong and if it happens its not covered by warranty as you are running the thing out of specs.
so its the owner choice, the risk its really small, nearly irrilevant but you cant tell him that there isnt any.
So I've been unable to get higher benchmarks than what I've attached. I know its not really a way to judge my phone, but rather me being curious. How are people getting such high scores on their rezounds? I'm currently running CleanROM 4.1 and loving every bit of it. Let me know what your scores are and what you've done to get those scores.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
the highest score i ever got was 7200 on BAMF ICS v1.1 with SebastianFM's kernel.
jchammer123 said:
So I've been unable to get higher benchmarks than what I've attached. I know its not really a way to judge my phone, but rather me being curious. How are people getting such high scores on their rezounds? I'm currently running CleanROM 4.1 and loving every bit of it. Let me know what your scores are and what you've done to get those scores.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a very similar score the first time I ran Antutu with CleanRom 4.1 (in the mid 3000's). I tried it again a few days later, not having changed anything in particular and got a 6276. So I'm not sure why there was a 3000+ point discrepency.
I've tried it a couple times and its consistantly in the 3000 range. I've never seen even remotely close to 7000 on my Rezound no matter what Rom I was running, lol.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
those benchmarking apps are inaccurate and useless. tried running twice back to back. first over 7000 then just barely 3500. total waste of time
dyetheskin said:
those benchmarking apps are inaccurate and useless. tried running twice back to back. first over 7000 then just barely 3500. total waste of time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I know they're not accurate, but until I have a better way to test it, I use em for the hell of it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
im also getting crap benchmarks on any gb kernel i try, doesn't make sense for a dual core device.
I've been hitting around 6k with Antutu.
I mostly use it as a comparison to my old Inctedible though...this phone is super smooth, so I don't really care what the benchmark says!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
what are you guys getting with cf-bench and the updated quadrant?
leroybrute said:
what are you guys getting with cf-bench and the updated quadrant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been getting decent scores with quadrant, but they haven't updated the list of devices so its hard to have anything to compare it to. I haven't tried the other one.
Also, I know there's a difference, but I get scores in the high 8000s with my Xoom overclocked to 1.5 ghz, but only 3000s with my Rezound clocked at 1.5 ghz as well.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
This has been discussed in Sebastians thread. It has to do w/ an issue with mpdecision. Besides benchmarks mean nothing!
All Day
I consistently get over 7000 when I run Antutu. Overclocked to 1.834 on cleanrom 4.3
I get close to 3000 with Quadrant...but I only really use it to see if new tweaks help or hurt.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Whoa...a lotof views,,but nut sure either
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
I don't think I have an answer, but you have to ask a question before you get an answer.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
takota6 said:
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was running newts rls1 and getting 3600 quadrant and 6500+ antutu. When I switched to rls3 everything went down...so back to rls1 for me.
Other people have pointed out and I find this to work, that if you use setcpu and check "enable profiles", the 2nd core is turned on. I went ahead and set a screen off profile of 192/192 (max/min). I"m experimenting with these values, though. It seems I can knock down my mA use (per Battery Monitor Widget) by using the profile. The cpu does appear to be scaling properly. Many people have said not to use any of these cpu things and I did have some trouble with setcpu previously but it seems to be doing its thing with RLS1 anyway.
takota6 said:
Just checking,but under antutu CPU master,or setcpu,and Rom manager pro..it only showes 1 core ..my quadrant are around 3500 ..s-off running newts rl3,,,txs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Programs probably just are't reading it right.
Speaking generally, the 2nd core will sit idle until needed, so it may be 'offline' when those apps check.
Until we get custom kernels/kernel source, there isn't much that can be done about it.
Sent from my evolving Rezound.
Lunatic summed it up perfectly. There are 2 cores, but the applications can't "see" them
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1496934 If you read through this thread the OP talks about the mpdecision not working properly. Basically it's the file that governs when both cores are on etc. It is something that can affect synthetic benches, but not real world performance. Probably why current ****s given by HTC = 0. Quadrant = trash and benches are for jerking off to numbers which generally is not an indicative to device performance. But whatever floats your boat I suppose .
Kool txs every1,,and I do use benchmarks to how my current Rom or tweak us working,,most of us are visual and need a program to tell us how it is..but I'm glad there s alot of hardcore peps to do the schooling
Perflock. There is no CPU management. Using setcpu doesn't do anything...its all in your head.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
It's like using a condom with a hole in it. There's no purpose for it, it'll only cause problems or children.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
If you use setcpu or similar and change pretty much any settings it should force the second core to do work.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
Like a couple others have said kernel source is the answer
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2