[INFO]Post your AnTuTu benchmark result! - Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go

Hi there!
I've just tried AnTuTu benchmark tools and it seems better then quadrant.
So, I'm curious, what do to guys get in total score when you run default (all) test with AnTuTu?
It would be fun to compare and see if there is any big differences, maybe between firmware?
So I'm gonna start.
First test with a total score of 6511:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And then used "SystemPanel App / Task Manager" and closed inactive, background and running apps and got this:
Second bench with use of SystemPanel a total score of 6612:
The only notable here was the CPU integer, as expected because less apps - higher integer.
Running fw Norway generic. 73 - all stock.
Some results from other phones:
Samsung Galaxy SIIII - 10000!
HTC One X - about 10000(!!)
Galaxy Note - about 6300
Google Nexus - about 6100
GSII - about 6000
Optimus 2X - about 5200
Moto Xoom - about 4750
Nexus S - about 2400
Wildfire S - about 1050
(note that scores varies from kernel to kernel, f.ex: SGII with Siyah kernel 1.4ghz gives about 7400,
overclock, sd-card speed also plays in)
So what do you guys get as result when running AnTuTu benchmark?
(please upload screenshot if u can)
AnTuTu market: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
Sent from my LT26i using xda premium

This my XperiaS on 73 fw. Locked bootloader so completely stock.
Sent from my XperiaS via transwarp beacon.

Sent from my LT26i using XDA

Sent from my LT26i using XDA

.62 Three Branded.
EDIT: Somehow I dont think this is a good bench ^^

Sent from my LT26i using XDA

Running rooted .73 Singapore generic
Sent from my LT26i using xda premium

0.67 UK Generic Firmware

Single Run .73 NL Generic on a UK XS White

What does these number mean guys?
What does these number mean guys?
Is this phone good enough for next two years to handle everything ?

Please delete this post

Some nice results guys! It looks like firmware version does not have so much to say if we compare .73 and .67. fw .62 on the other hand..
See first post, I added some results from other phones so u can see where your phone's at on the overall scale!
Keep it going!
Scratchling said:
.62 Three Branded.
EDIT: Somehow I dont think this is a good bench ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not? The results varies every time when running the benchmark. Some new apps may be open'd from last time u bench'd and that will affect the result.
Also if you copied something to the sd-card, that also affects the result.
eggman89 said:
What does these number mean guys?
Is this phone good enough for next two years to handle everything ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It only gives you a overall scores that you can compare to other results so you get an idea where your phone is on the global phone scale.
Yeah, it should not be any problem.

Sikiduck; I think you should also add in other benchmarkers.
i think of quadrant and HONTO.
Screens from antutu, qudrant and honto. In that order.

FW .67
Sent from my LT26i with Tapatalk 2

Smart ass v2
Sent from my LT26i using xda premium

Performance @ DoomKernel

kazuni said:
Performance @ DoomKernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got better score on the same kernel (@ 1.728 Ghz)

DooMLoRD said:
i got better score on the same kernel (@ 1.728 Ghz)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see what you did there

juzz|NOR said:
Sikiduck; I think you should also add in other benchmarkers.
i think of quadrant and HONTO.
Screens from antutu, qudrant and honto. In that order.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure. I think it will be too many benchs at the same time, and compare those... It would be just messy
OO u DoomLord and kazuni, some nice results u got there.. if I was only able to install another kernel (locked bl)!

forgot to get a screenshot
but i got 7281 on DooMKernel
Im catching you up DooMLorD just got 7316

Related

825Mhz

What exactly would happen if I OC'ed to this freq?
System will be more smooth , speed of operations will be alot better but your battery will be going crazy incrasing temperature of the device
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
I think.. if it can handles it will remain stable.. if not it will reboot..
Owain oc it to 825 so its is stable and everything what i wrote is going after oc.
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
Driveskull said:
Owain oc it to 825 so its is stable and everything what i wrote is going after oc.
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no way to go up to 825 with the existing module... The phone hangs and reboots immediatly... Most phones works fine on 729 and 748...
I have no time to look after his post but he said that he is awesome dev so he know what he is doing so those freqwences are for us normal users
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
your phone transform in toaster certified!!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Mine can run up to 768Mhz with no reboots at all!
Sent from my X10mini using XDA App
guys... You're all fail xD got mine up to 1200 mHz by modding the right files going to post a screen of it next week or something (I'm not anywhere near my dev-comp atm)... But it overheated within 5 minutes and I didn't run it on battery - had a direct powerconnection instead of the battery
BTW: That was awesome fast!
Superb. But i think we are talking about useful oc no only for five mins. You can overclok everything to its limits but you need good tools and sources for that . And oc is personal device side cos every device will overclok in individual way
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
Driveskull said:
Superb. But i think we are talking about useful oc no only for five mins. You can overclok everything to its limits but you need good tools and sources for that . And oc is personal device side cos every device will overclok in individual way
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly It was totally only experimental and for proving to myselv, that it was possible Running a stable 749 mHz
My X10 Mini can only go to 748 before freezing on me.
825Mhz ???
It freeze on boot & restarting ...
my phone can't reach 729Mhz only stable at 710
If you want higher freqwences just change voltage of battery this can help because phone could restart depending od the temerature of device smaller voltage =smaller temperature
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
how could i change voltage battery????
Someone already posted small tutorial in the forum i saw this in the big x10 forum. And learn to use the high and mighty search button.
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
Your phone will be hanged and then u need to reboot it and remember in setcpu dont save the profile to set on boot.....as u will have very less time on startup to change it back to 729mhz....coz this is highest frequency.....if u set the profile on set on boot and OC to 825mhz u may need to update software ........
Sorry for Bad english
---------- Post added at 02:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:54 AM ----------
DustArma said:
My X10 Mini can only go to 748 before freezing on me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
729mhz is highest.....it worked only once for me on Remix 3.2 (2.2.1 froyo) custom rom.........
745 here. Stable. (still slow if you ask me.)
806 Mhz... battery life is good

[Q] SGS2 Fast ROM & Kernel Combo (5333 Quadrant)

Had my new galaxy s 2 for a little over a week now, tried many combinations and this is the best I have found so far.
Anyone have a better combo/quadrant score with SGS2?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Set CPU 1600ghz min - 1600ghz max
Voltage - 1400mv
Scaling - Ondemand
Sampling Rate - 100000
GT-I9100
2.3.5 DevNull-TEST
I9100XXXKH3
2.6.35.11-XCeLL-69V+
I have had better scores with 'ninphetamine-2.1.3-release' kernel on the same ROM of around 5800 but when I activate wifi the device crashes and loops? any ideas??
Can u post a link too ur kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
XCeLL-V69 Kernel
www.4shared.com/file/3EJ31d6X/XCeLL-V69-Miui8.html?
not allowed to post outside links until I post 8 times hence the 'www'
13pointseven said:
Had my new galaxy s 2 for a little over a week now, tried many combinations and this is the best I have found so far.
Anyone have a better combo/quadrant score with SGS2?
Set CPU 1600ghz min - 1600ghz max
Voltage - 1400mv
Scaling - Ondemand
Sampling Rate - 100000
GT-I9100
2.3.5 DevNull-TEST
I9100XXXKH3
2.6.35.11-XCeLL-69V+
I have had better scores with 'ninphetamine-2.1.3-release' kernel on the same ROM of around 5800 but when I activate wifi the device crashes and loops? any ideas??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using this kernel with GalnetMIUI and the phone restarts when I enable wifi. Seems to me that this is a kernel bug.
Which one? I am no longer experiencing wifi crash with xcell kernel. Ninphetemine works with 2.3.4 but I can't seem to find a ver as light weight as 2.3.5 devnull.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Wow, dun be too greedy, u won't want to fried ur s2 hehe
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
I wonder how much your battery / phone resists like this
Tried 'Scaling: Performance' yet?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Haha, I only use this setup for benchmarking, it dose get rarther warm . Running oxygen 2.2.2 for everyday use. Nearly perfect apart from volume glitch.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
As for the performance scaling I have had better results using ondemand as it gives you the ability to change the sample rate.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
*sigh* people still rely on quadrant scores... i thought its been covered that it isnt accurate for dual core phones --_--.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Run CF-BENCH that is a rel benchmark
Could you post me a link to that thread please?
GT-I9100
Oxygen 2.2.2 (2.3.5)
I9100XXKH3
2.6.35.7-cyanogenmod+
13pointseven said:
Could you post me a link to that thread please?
GT-I9100
Oxygen 2.2.2 (2.3.5)
I9100XXKH3
2.6.35.7-cyanogenmod+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search it on the market.
As for when you enable wifi it reboots. Its because its not meant to work. Its a ****ing miracle it does. Its built for samsung source roms not aosp.
And dont base things on benchmark scores, they mean litterally nothing
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Sorry I was refering to the thread on the inaccuracie of quadrant scores for dual core phones, I have since downloaded CF Bench and scored 8496 with same setup. How on earth are people getting 90000+ with same device also at 1.6ghz??
Appriciate the input tho!
GT-I9100
Oxygen 2.2.2 (2.3.5)
I9100XXKH3
2.6.35.7-cyanogenmod+
Is the kernel from the OP going to work on cyanogen? 'Cause I wanted to give it a try, but since it was originally thought for MIUI I'm not sure about it, even though it works with DevNull.
I belive it dose but will have the wifi bug.
GT-I9100
Oxygen 2.2.2 (2.3.5)
I9100XXKH3
2.6.35.7-cyanogenmod+
XCeLL-V69 Kernel ????????
www.doubleyoudoubleyoudoubleyou.4shared.com/file/3EJ31d6X/XCeLL-V69-Miui8.html
never heard about this kernel !
Im sorry is it multi kernel or just miui?
Haha, will update the link, was because I hadn't posted x8.
Ran it on cm7 oxygen and devnull2.3.5 all of which have the wifi bug as ninphetemine dose on these ROMS.
GT-I9100
Oxygen 2.2.2 (2.3.5)
I9100XXKH3
2.6.35.7-cyanogenmod+
I know this is a bit of am old thread and people are hating on Quadrant but I thought I would post my score of 6323 for fun

Why do i get so low score on quadrant?

Hi everybody, thanks in advance for reading this. Well, i have a problem... i get low score on every benchmark app... like quadrant, take a look
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
i compare it with a friend, and his score is +5200 :/ same configs, recently fully wiped and evertything, but i can pass the 4000 points no matter what i do.
This is the firmware installed, just stock.
So, do you think my scores are normal or my device has something buggy :/ ? thanks
Why don't you root it and install siyah kernel. And try again
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Because he's wondering why its low on a stock firmware. He knows he can get higher
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I am rooted and my score is 5596
avataranjie said:
Because he's wondering why its low on a stock firmware. He knows he can get higher
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, thats the problem.
The question was about being on stock I believe. Why is rootyourphoneandflash suggested? Not everyone wants to root and flash.
@OP.. does it feel slow to you? Have you tried other benchmarks?
Its quadrant for Christ sake. When has this app ever been uaed for real world benchmarking?!. No benchmarking application can compare to real life usage. If its smooth in real life, who cares what Quadrant says???
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
the only validity of benchmarking is for you to compare your phone when flashing between roms, and that is dubious at best,.......don't worry about them, gauge your phone on how it feels
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Quadrant is well known as a poor benchmark.
Antutu or CF Bench are more reliable .
Or join the my quadrant is bigger than your quadrant forum .
jje
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Oh, you e-peen vely smarr, my e-peen vely big....
*Japanese guys from chinpokomon south park episode*
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Here are my results, albeit with SiyahKernel and OMEGA ROM:
Total: 5524
CPU: 12930
Mem: 4658
I/O: 6990
2D: 1000
3D: 2042
It's odd that you're getting those numbers... I don't think SiyahKernel can improve that much, maybe a little, but definitely not as much.
ChavitoArg said:
Hi everybody, thanks in advance for reading this. Well, i have a problem... i get low score on every benchmark app... like quadrant, take a look
i compare it with a friend, and his score is +5200 :/ same configs, recently fully wiped and evertything, but i can pass the 4000 points no matter what i do.
This is the firmware installed, just stock.
So, do you think my scores are normal or my device has something buggy :/ ? thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmark tests don`t mean anything, have nothing to do with real life user xperience.
what im trying to say is, i compared mine and my friend S3, same stock firmware, run quadrant and there is a different of 1200 points
Thanks everyone for the answers
ChavitoArg said:
what im trying to say is, i compared mine and my friend S3, same stock firmware, run quadrant and there is a different of 1200 points
Thanks everyone for the answers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It also depends on how may apps and widgets you have running.
watsa said:
The question was about being on stock I believe. Why is rootyourphoneandflash suggested? Not everyone wants to root and flash.
@OP.. does it feel slow to you? Have you tried other benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have tryied antutu, and still lower score :/ i dont really understand
ChavitoArg said:
i have tryied antutu, and still lower score :/ i dont really understand
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lower score than what ??????
10,000
Benchmarks are a tool that run a series of tests no more no less . Phones and software/ apps/ firmware vary their is no true test as no phone is the same .
Suggest if you are not happy with your score .
one backup data and factory reset the phone .
still not happy return to seller/ service center
jje
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
for me I don't care about the benchmark mark at all
even you get the highest score did you very happy about it ?
and just enjoy your phone, don't think so much
Every single phone performs differently and its due to manufacturing. Also hot/cold temps can effect performance. Generally, the colder your device is the better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Technically, your phone and your friend's should have the same firmware since you're probably in the same country. And this means that your benchmark scores should be quite similar. A 1200 point difference is a bit too much.
So in short, there might actually be cause for concern.
I would suggest that you wipe everything and see if it still persists. But if your phone performance is unaffected, you could just as well ignore it.

[GT-5830i]AnTuTu Benchmark results discuss here how to improve our devices

Let us share AnTuTu Benchmark results for GT-5830i here, some people got so high score, and some people had poor score.. please share your experiences here, may help alot for who makes custom ROM/Kernel... Those who use Chainfire3D, ROM Toolbox, tweaks kernel, using performance governor or overclock cpu.. please share...
Any how my SGAi are only getting this...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I guess this is not too poor not too high rite...
This is my score in antutu benchmark
Enviado desde mi GT-S5830i usando Tapatalk 2
no modification ...just stock ...bad or good?
ObS3SSioN said:
no modification ...just stock ...bad or good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good i think, im also not using modification just make a themes, using kernel from rafael(but mdds a lil), and just removing the stock apps of samsung then i get 1719... I think using chainfire3d can make high score maybe coz our graphic currently low the SGA(for this time)...
apu314 said:
This is my score in antutu benchmark
Enviado desde mi GT-S5830i usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is it also stock?
mine is here, it is rooted but stock rom....but have themes and applications installed and chainfire 3d!
dehackers said:
good i think, im also not using modification just make a themes, using kernel from rafael(but mdds a lil), and just removing the stock apps of samsung then i get 1719... I think using chainfire3d can make high score maybe coz our graphic currently low the SGA(for this time)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah with chainfire 3d you can get 3d graphics score upto 411 and 2d to 236...see mine!
IAmNice said:
I dont own ur device but a friend of mine does. He had 1800 or something with overclock and some other tweaks. Btw I normally reach 2000 +with my x8 on 2.3.7 with 727 mhz
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclock? WHERE?
This thread is for S5830i,not X8
That´s my score
---------- Post added at 06:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:22 PM ----------
sorry here it is:
ROM: Retribution beta#2
v6 supercharger
1972 yeah it's good.. anybody can beat that Xperia ...
so summary we are only can get the not up then 2000 score, anybody get idea how to improve it? but please not too much for getting 2000++ makes the phone battery life drain super fast... make it hybrid and make it superb score...
my score
Here is my score.
i'm using Retribution mod beta 2
Dunno why my SD read and SD write speed is 0.
SCORE : 1407
Shalzz said:
Here is my score.
i'm using Retribution mod beta 2
Dunno why my sd rear/write speed is 0.
Score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need at least 500mb free space on your SD card to get a score
Sent from my GT-S5830i
looking at benchmarks hell adreno200 is way ahead of whatever videocore you guys have
madman said:
looking at benchmarks hell adreno200 is way ahead of whatever videocore you guys have
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reason is adreno200 has its sources and is used at its full power while VideoCore IV sources arent even released (i blame broadcom).... else i think VideoCore IV would get higher scores.
zeelie said:
Reason is adreno200 has its sources and is used at its full power while VideoCore IV sources arent even released (i blame broadcom).... else i think VideoCore IV would get higher scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahah don't blame broadcom too fast..
zeelie said:
Reason is adreno200 has its sources and is used at its full power while VideoCore IV sources arent even released (i blame broadcom).... else i think VideoCore IV would get higher scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this are child stories that sources are not released.. samsung have full control over them.. and who said adreno200 sources ?? can you provide link ? all are closed source...whoever says don't have source blame them.. those things are only necessary to get cm7 not stock samsung roms
YEAH... I agree 100% with madman
Stock 5830M w/ Chainfire
TxaEkis said:
Stock 5830M w/ Chainfire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG, you have better performance with stock rom than other people with a custom rom
i think custom rom from raj was still on the top... droidrazr

Post Your Benchmark Scores Here!

The Title says it all
Post whatever you feel like, most people use Antutu or Quadrant Standard but feel free to add Geekbench or any others
Help some people out as well, let them know if you're using a custom rom or kernel or what version of android your on
All I can say is that this is a beast!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
J
Well... I thought the GPe ROM would do okay, but this isn't really okay, lol. This is quite bad.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
LordManhattan said:
Well... I thought the GPe ROM would do okay, but this isn't really okay, lol. This is quite bad.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess theres optimizations in sonys software? but then again ive never seen the SD800 that low
This phone was missing one of the classics Benchmark threads!
Rom .290 just removed some stuff I didnt now want but is a stock one.
LordManhattan said:
Well... I thought the GPe ROM would do okay, but this isn't really okay, lol. This is quite bad.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it looks to be running as low as my previous CM10 attempt. I wonder what is missing. :/
Odd result really.
shaolin95 said:
This phone was missing one of the classics Benchmark threads!
Rom .290 just removed some stuff I didnt now want but is a stock one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the hell did you remove? XD Whats taking up so much that you're getting more then 2k extra
J
hahaha not sure, just probably the usual Benchmark variances...I cant wait to OC this thing!
shaolin95 said:
hahaha not sure, just probably the usual Benchmark variances...I cant wait to OC this thing!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah! I noticed there are no kernels except for 1 which is based on stock?
What do you think we could go up to? 2.5ghz? maybe more? The nexus 5 has an overclockable kernel that goes up to 3.0ghz! Not that you need it that high and no one has ever dared go that high but still, the options there
J
I'm back on 290 (i screwed up something on GPe), and i just ran Antutu again. I'm getting everything between 32 and 34,300.
LordManhattan said:
I'm back on 290 (i screwed up something on GPe), and i just ran Antutu again. I'm getting everything between 32 and 34,300.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah thats good, My first ever test run was at just under 35k bit of a beast of a phone
that's mine.
monx rom unlocked
290 firmware. Getting 35 < 37 on my C6833
luca73n said:
that's mine.
monx rom unlocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks good lets keep them coming in
pablodelouis said:
290 firmware. Getting 35 < 37 on my C6833
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How on earth did you get it that high
I've had just under 35k but just then the best I got on two runs was 33656 on a C6802 running my own cooked rom based on .290 and doggrom 3.x
blueether said:
I've had just under 35k but just then the best I got on two runs was 336656 on a C6802 running my own cooked rom based on .290 and doggrom 3.x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you running an i7? 336656 is helluva score, lol.
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
might have to remove one of the middle 6's
JackHanAnLG said:
How on earth did you get it that high
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Run banchmark on a cool device, close all apps in the background
Looking good guys keep them coming in.
Sent from my C6833 using xda app-developers app
Also i got over 37k by overclocking the CPU to 2.35 ghz with Carbon rom, did not try to oc the GPU though, but i went back to stock 4.3 because i had my signals bars stuck at 2 bars with this rom.
I'm waiting for a full stable / no bugs 4.4 rom so i can try RevolutionKernel and push that GPU to 600 MHz
I did manage this last week before it died! DoggROM v4.6 : 34391
Stock CPU clock.

Categories

Resources