The Title says it all
Post whatever you feel like, most people use Antutu or Quadrant Standard but feel free to add Geekbench or any others
Help some people out as well, let them know if you're using a custom rom or kernel or what version of android your on
All I can say is that this is a beast!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
J
Well... I thought the GPe ROM would do okay, but this isn't really okay, lol. This is quite bad.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
LordManhattan said:
Well... I thought the GPe ROM would do okay, but this isn't really okay, lol. This is quite bad.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess theres optimizations in sonys software? but then again ive never seen the SD800 that low
This phone was missing one of the classics Benchmark threads!
Rom .290 just removed some stuff I didnt now want but is a stock one.
LordManhattan said:
Well... I thought the GPe ROM would do okay, but this isn't really okay, lol. This is quite bad.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it looks to be running as low as my previous CM10 attempt. I wonder what is missing. :/
Odd result really.
shaolin95 said:
This phone was missing one of the classics Benchmark threads!
Rom .290 just removed some stuff I didnt now want but is a stock one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the hell did you remove? XD Whats taking up so much that you're getting more then 2k extra
J
hahaha not sure, just probably the usual Benchmark variances...I cant wait to OC this thing!
shaolin95 said:
hahaha not sure, just probably the usual Benchmark variances...I cant wait to OC this thing!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah! I noticed there are no kernels except for 1 which is based on stock?
What do you think we could go up to? 2.5ghz? maybe more? The nexus 5 has an overclockable kernel that goes up to 3.0ghz! Not that you need it that high and no one has ever dared go that high but still, the options there
J
I'm back on 290 (i screwed up something on GPe), and i just ran Antutu again. I'm getting everything between 32 and 34,300.
LordManhattan said:
I'm back on 290 (i screwed up something on GPe), and i just ran Antutu again. I'm getting everything between 32 and 34,300.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah thats good, My first ever test run was at just under 35k bit of a beast of a phone
that's mine.
monx rom unlocked
290 firmware. Getting 35 < 37 on my C6833
luca73n said:
that's mine.
monx rom unlocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks good lets keep them coming in
pablodelouis said:
290 firmware. Getting 35 < 37 on my C6833
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How on earth did you get it that high
I've had just under 35k but just then the best I got on two runs was 33656 on a C6802 running my own cooked rom based on .290 and doggrom 3.x
blueether said:
I've had just under 35k but just then the best I got on two runs was 336656 on a C6802 running my own cooked rom based on .290 and doggrom 3.x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you running an i7? 336656 is helluva score, lol.
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
might have to remove one of the middle 6's
JackHanAnLG said:
How on earth did you get it that high
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Run banchmark on a cool device, close all apps in the background
Looking good guys keep them coming in.
Sent from my C6833 using xda app-developers app
Also i got over 37k by overclocking the CPU to 2.35 ghz with Carbon rom, did not try to oc the GPU though, but i went back to stock 4.3 because i had my signals bars stuck at 2 bars with this rom.
I'm waiting for a full stable / no bugs 4.4 rom so i can try RevolutionKernel and push that GPU to 600 MHz
I did manage this last week before it died! DoggROM v4.6 : 34391
Stock CPU clock.
Related
Check this out Qualcomm has released their own Benchmark tool/app
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-releases-vellamo-a-new-web-benchmarking-app/
Posted this cause I know some of you live by this
thanks
Thanks alot trying it out right now ........lets see what happens
scored 752
rerooted removed bloat ran again and got 923 wahoooo.....
Kingmac38 said:
Thanks alot trying it out right now ........lets see what happens
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a 723 I was beneath the Sensation and Galaxy Tab
Edit: Ran it again and got a 782
Matstarr said:
I got a 723 I was beneath the Sensation and Galaxy Tab
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same, except I received 805 points with my original Galaxy S.
What kind of device do you have?
Munszu said:
Same, except I received 805 points with my original Galaxy S.
What kind of device do you have?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm the 3VO perhaps?
Hm. 756 with some stuff running in the background.
Galaxy tab and sensation were top performers.
Seems to only test one core though.
Edit: stock rom, kernel not overclocked.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Thanks for the laugh of the day. Hanging curve ball and you hit it into the left center bleachers.
Ummm the 3VO perhaps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Matstarr said:
Ummm the 3VO perhaps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, sorry!
I didn't see this was the Evo3D forum. I just searched on Google, because I was curious what kind of results do other people get. My bad.
liverstealerJobs said:
Thanks for the laugh of the day. Hanging curve ball and you hit it into the left center bleachers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As much as I loved my line I loved your response
Munszu said:
Oh, sorry!
I didn't see this was the Evo3D forum. I just searched on Google, because I was curious what kind of results do other people get. My bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
A Galaxy S owner that happened to stumble into an EVO section and say his numbers were better I'm calling shenanigans
Link is down!
novanosis85 said:
Link is down!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do a search for the app on the market. No big deal.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
903 @ 1.5GHz.\
Matstarr said:
A Galaxy S owner that happened to stumble into an EVO section and say his numbers were better I'm calling shenanigans
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously, it was a coincidence. It's 23:33(11:33 PM) here and I'm a bit tired now. Otherwise I would have seen that this is the Evo 3D forum and wouldn't have got myself into this embarrasing situation. ^^
775 here.....
856 over here.
Got a 939
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Yes!! Another worthless benchmark.
got a 926 on my 1.8ghz 3vo
heres the link to anyone that wants it
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo&feature=search_result
I got 767. Why is 3VO getting lower score than sensation? Makes me mad.
I want to see how SG2 performs on this benchmark.
When SG2 raped 3VO with quadrant, there were excuses.
Now this benchmark is by qualcomm, there is no more excuse.
This might bring Exynos vs snapdragon debate to the end.
Hi there!
I've just tried AnTuTu benchmark tools and it seems better then quadrant.
So, I'm curious, what do to guys get in total score when you run default (all) test with AnTuTu?
It would be fun to compare and see if there is any big differences, maybe between firmware?
So I'm gonna start.
First test with a total score of 6511:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And then used "SystemPanel App / Task Manager" and closed inactive, background and running apps and got this:
Second bench with use of SystemPanel a total score of 6612:
The only notable here was the CPU integer, as expected because less apps - higher integer.
Running fw Norway generic. 73 - all stock.
Some results from other phones:
Samsung Galaxy SIIII - 10000!
HTC One X - about 10000(!!)
Galaxy Note - about 6300
Google Nexus - about 6100
GSII - about 6000
Optimus 2X - about 5200
Moto Xoom - about 4750
Nexus S - about 2400
Wildfire S - about 1050
(note that scores varies from kernel to kernel, f.ex: SGII with Siyah kernel 1.4ghz gives about 7400,
overclock, sd-card speed also plays in)
So what do you guys get as result when running AnTuTu benchmark?
(please upload screenshot if u can)
AnTuTu market: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
Sent from my LT26i using xda premium
This my XperiaS on 73 fw. Locked bootloader so completely stock.
Sent from my XperiaS via transwarp beacon.
Sent from my LT26i using XDA
Sent from my LT26i using XDA
.62 Three Branded.
EDIT: Somehow I dont think this is a good bench ^^
Sent from my LT26i using XDA
Running rooted .73 Singapore generic
Sent from my LT26i using xda premium
0.67 UK Generic Firmware
Single Run .73 NL Generic on a UK XS White
What does these number mean guys?
What does these number mean guys?
Is this phone good enough for next two years to handle everything ?
Please delete this post
Some nice results guys! It looks like firmware version does not have so much to say if we compare .73 and .67. fw .62 on the other hand..
See first post, I added some results from other phones so u can see where your phone's at on the overall scale!
Keep it going!
Scratchling said:
.62 Three Branded.
EDIT: Somehow I dont think this is a good bench ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not? The results varies every time when running the benchmark. Some new apps may be open'd from last time u bench'd and that will affect the result.
Also if you copied something to the sd-card, that also affects the result.
eggman89 said:
What does these number mean guys?
Is this phone good enough for next two years to handle everything ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It only gives you a overall scores that you can compare to other results so you get an idea where your phone is on the global phone scale.
Yeah, it should not be any problem.
Sikiduck; I think you should also add in other benchmarkers.
i think of quadrant and HONTO.
Screens from antutu, qudrant and honto. In that order.
FW .67
Sent from my LT26i with Tapatalk 2
Smart ass v2
Sent from my LT26i using xda premium
Performance @ DoomKernel
kazuni said:
Performance @ DoomKernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got better score on the same kernel (@ 1.728 Ghz)
DooMLoRD said:
i got better score on the same kernel (@ 1.728 Ghz)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see what you did there
juzz|NOR said:
Sikiduck; I think you should also add in other benchmarkers.
i think of quadrant and HONTO.
Screens from antutu, qudrant and honto. In that order.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure. I think it will be too many benchs at the same time, and compare those... It would be just messy
OO u DoomLord and kazuni, some nice results u got there.. if I was only able to install another kernel (locked bl)!
forgot to get a screenshot
but i got 7281 on DooMKernel
Im catching you up DooMLorD just got 7316
See others. Getting 7500 with 1.83ghz
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Ugh....whats the question??
Edit...btw i get 7656
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
sent from nitro powered.note clockin 1.83 in a quarter mile!!
My pic didnt work? hmm. Im getting like 7000 at 1.83, FJ rom,
Can you post the detailed score to see where mines slackin? I notice I never hit over 1500 on ram? I seen some hti like 1650.
Work now
Just stop worrying about benchmarks. They're pointless. They can be skewed by random stuff, so they don't mean much. If your phone is running just as smoothly or smoother, then what does a number matter?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
welchertc said:
Just stop worrying about benchmarks. They're pointless. They can be skewed by random stuff, so they don't mean much. If your phone is running just as smoothly or smoother, then what does a number matter?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because benchmarking is god to some...sadly.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
erick161 said:
Because benchmarking is god to some...sadly.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phonedog.com lmao.
-Once you go NOTE, you'd say 4 inches a Joke
NOTE user:
"take a deep breath, make sure to get a good look at it, relax and slowly take it in, the size is overwhelming at first but you will have a happy ending afterwards".
Woman:
:O
welchertc said:
Just stop worrying about benchmarks. They're pointless. They can be skewed by random stuff, so they don't mean much. If your phone is running just as smoothly or smoother, then what does a number matter?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasnt sure if it was just a wang measuring contest or not..
Benchmark means nothing or just not everything?
I was using it as a base to determine if my rig does well. I'm at 1.83ghz, and rooms super smooth on FJ rom, I'm just a speed whore and want it to be fast as possible.
liftedzuki said:
My pic didnt work? hmm. Im getting like 7000 at 1.83, FJ rom,
Can you post the detailed score to see where mines slackin? I notice I never hit over 1500 on ram? I seen some hti like 1650.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here ya go a lil more detail lol
sent from memosphere remix
ram and I/O is really slacking.. Hmm.
liftedzuki said:
ram and I/O is really slacking.. Hmm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U on fj? And which one
g-note clocked 1.83 in quarter mile!!!
liftedzuki said:
ram and I/O is really slacking.. Hmm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I looked on ur about me and i seen ur on cm9..are u using fjs kernel or hotwir
g-note clocked 1.83 in quarter mile!!!
Was fj ucld6 now cm9 nightly and can't hit past 7000. Fj aosp kernel.
1.83ghz.On both
liftedzuki said:
I wasnt sure if it was just a wang measuring contest or not..
Benchmark means nothing or just not everything?
I was using it as a base to determine if my rig does well. I'm at 1.83ghz, and rooms super smooth on FJ rom, I'm just a speed whore and want it to be fast as possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it says something comparing scores between different clock speeds on the same ROM, but even the same ROM on two different phones will give different scores. Comparing benchmarks with other people is definitely a pissing match.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
No its not a pissing match..it shows how the same phone can srill be very dif mine scores r very consistant so if his r low made i can help figure out y if u think its a pissing match put ur stick up
g-note clocked 1.83 in quarter mile!!!
liftedzuki said:
Was fj ucld6 now cm9 nightly and can't hit past 7000. Fj aosp kernel.
1.83ghz.On both
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Change ur kernel and see if u get higher i seen somewhere fj said his first kernel release would not show much better scores on benchmark..not sure about the 2nd i always use hotwires
g-note clocked 1.83 in quarter mile!!!
I benchmarked mine at 7504 yesterday.
Thanks, I been cleaning up the apps alot n what not.
Hi everybody, thanks in advance for reading this. Well, i have a problem... i get low score on every benchmark app... like quadrant, take a look
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
i compare it with a friend, and his score is +5200 :/ same configs, recently fully wiped and evertything, but i can pass the 4000 points no matter what i do.
This is the firmware installed, just stock.
So, do you think my scores are normal or my device has something buggy :/ ? thanks
Why don't you root it and install siyah kernel. And try again
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Because he's wondering why its low on a stock firmware. He knows he can get higher
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I am rooted and my score is 5596
avataranjie said:
Because he's wondering why its low on a stock firmware. He knows he can get higher
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, thats the problem.
The question was about being on stock I believe. Why is rootyourphoneandflash suggested? Not everyone wants to root and flash.
@OP.. does it feel slow to you? Have you tried other benchmarks?
Its quadrant for Christ sake. When has this app ever been uaed for real world benchmarking?!. No benchmarking application can compare to real life usage. If its smooth in real life, who cares what Quadrant says???
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
the only validity of benchmarking is for you to compare your phone when flashing between roms, and that is dubious at best,.......don't worry about them, gauge your phone on how it feels
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Quadrant is well known as a poor benchmark.
Antutu or CF Bench are more reliable .
Or join the my quadrant is bigger than your quadrant forum .
jje
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Oh, you e-peen vely smarr, my e-peen vely big....
*Japanese guys from chinpokomon south park episode*
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Here are my results, albeit with SiyahKernel and OMEGA ROM:
Total: 5524
CPU: 12930
Mem: 4658
I/O: 6990
2D: 1000
3D: 2042
It's odd that you're getting those numbers... I don't think SiyahKernel can improve that much, maybe a little, but definitely not as much.
ChavitoArg said:
Hi everybody, thanks in advance for reading this. Well, i have a problem... i get low score on every benchmark app... like quadrant, take a look
i compare it with a friend, and his score is +5200 :/ same configs, recently fully wiped and evertything, but i can pass the 4000 points no matter what i do.
This is the firmware installed, just stock.
So, do you think my scores are normal or my device has something buggy :/ ? thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmark tests don`t mean anything, have nothing to do with real life user xperience.
what im trying to say is, i compared mine and my friend S3, same stock firmware, run quadrant and there is a different of 1200 points
Thanks everyone for the answers
ChavitoArg said:
what im trying to say is, i compared mine and my friend S3, same stock firmware, run quadrant and there is a different of 1200 points
Thanks everyone for the answers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It also depends on how may apps and widgets you have running.
watsa said:
The question was about being on stock I believe. Why is rootyourphoneandflash suggested? Not everyone wants to root and flash.
@OP.. does it feel slow to you? Have you tried other benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have tryied antutu, and still lower score :/ i dont really understand
ChavitoArg said:
i have tryied antutu, and still lower score :/ i dont really understand
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lower score than what ??????
10,000
Benchmarks are a tool that run a series of tests no more no less . Phones and software/ apps/ firmware vary their is no true test as no phone is the same .
Suggest if you are not happy with your score .
one backup data and factory reset the phone .
still not happy return to seller/ service center
jje
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
for me I don't care about the benchmark mark at all
even you get the highest score did you very happy about it ?
and just enjoy your phone, don't think so much
Every single phone performs differently and its due to manufacturing. Also hot/cold temps can effect performance. Generally, the colder your device is the better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Technically, your phone and your friend's should have the same firmware since you're probably in the same country. And this means that your benchmark scores should be quite similar. A 1200 point difference is a bit too much.
So in short, there might actually be cause for concern.
I would suggest that you wipe everything and see if it still persists. But if your phone performance is unaffected, you could just as well ignore it.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Is this the normal ram usage? The system usage doesnt look normal.. Is this a bug in oxygen os?
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Android is based on linux and linux uses unused ram for caching, which is a absolutely ok (unused ram is wasted ram). This is also why ram cleaner apps are a really bad idea.
Read this: http://www.linuxatemyram.com/
I wouldn't say so. In normal use OOS had 1.6 to 1.7 free at all times.
Omicron Technics
sniper20 said:
I wouldn't say so. In normal use OOS had 1.6 to 1.7 free at all times.
Omicron Technics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, i am used to aosp roms on nexus 5. The system ram usage wasnt too high on that. Also , opx was feeling a little slower on than the n5. Opx has better specs. I don't know why it is performing like this.
Samarth_17 said:
Yea, i am used to aosp roms on nexus 5. The system ram usage wasnt too high on that. Also , opx was feeling a little slower on than the n5. Opx has better specs. I don't know why it is performing like this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry about this too much, we have 3 gb of RAM. Free RAM means, it has ability to load more. It keeps changing. Blame oxygen os for slowness. You can guess this by all ranting about oos on oneplus forum. Like many other, switch to custom ROM and have a smooth experience. CM 13 just got official, what better than now to switch.
saurabh40629 said:
Don't worry about this too much, we have 3 gb of RAM. Free RAM means, it has ability to load more. It keeps changing. Blame oxygen os for slowness. You can guess this by all ranting about oos on oneplus forum. Like many other, switch to custom ROM and have a smooth experience. CM 13 just got official, what better than now to switch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah well i was interested in trying hydrogen os. If i don't like it. CM13 or aokp is the choice.
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Samarth_17 said:
Yeah well i was interested in trying hydrogen os. If i don't like it. CM13 or aokp is the choice.
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^this
Flashing CM13 is the way to go
_AI_ said:
^this
Flashing CM13 is the way to go
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The nightly was just uploaded, is it stable enough?
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
_AI_ said:
^this
Flashing CM13 is the way to go
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i guess you were right. The phone is much snappier. And the ram usage is right too.
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
same with here, i think it is still normal.
Samarth_17 said:
Well i guess you were right. The phone is much snappier. And the ram usage is right too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah sorry I didn't get back to you. Exam week.
Rocking this ROM as my daily driver currently. Have the X on StraightTalk and the Nexus on Verizon.