,What is the best kernel for oxygen 2.7 regarding for battery life,i use my phone now only for texting and i want it to last long,can you give suggestions?,
Franco kernel
Sent from my Xoom tablet using Tapatalk
Personally, I find ROQ XII the best kernel as it has more governors. I know that Franco did say that governors didn't matter, but from my personal experience, I disagree with his statement.
ta-gb kernel version 1 is the best!. in my opinion ONLY
miuiandroidfan said:
Personally, I find ROQ XII the best kernel as it has more governors. I know that Franco did say that governors didn't matter, but from my personal experience, I disagree with his statement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
,im using RoqXII now so far so good,^^,RoqXIII-paolo touchfix is not that good to mine,franco kernel 4 gives almost the same battery life as of stock oxygen,i dont tried ta-gb 1.1 yet but im happy now with RoqXII,^^
I agree with ta being the best
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
,i will try now ta-gb 1.0,
Related
Hi everyone..I want to know what rom is the better for this device..I think CM7 is better specially with the official update which is due to arrive..
[OT]Is there any post for the presentation??[/OT]
The best rom depends on you.
For me? devoid.franco and his kernel.
dieguchoel said:
The best rom depends on you.
For me? devoid.franco and his kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i def + 1 what you have said
dieguchoel said:
The best rom depends on you.
For me? devoid.franco and his kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 from me too
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Stock ROM.
Hey, I only got the phone on Sunday. For now, the stock ROM and the minimal tweaks I made (JIT, touchscreen fix, ondemand underclock) are quite enough.
CM7/GB for performance, any other froyo rom for battery. It doesn't matter how many tweaks/kernel you apply to froyo, it will still be buggy with performance and you will keep flashing new tweaks/kernels. lol
I can only agree with mansirawat
CM7 rocks (even in draining battery )
For dayly use I use custom Froyo rom, for this moment it's LOL 1.4.2 with some of francofrancisco tweaks and kernel.
Devoid.francov5, franco.kernel v11 with darktremors apps2sd
The best rom for you and your phone is, without a question, the stock rom. It is most stable, safe and will always be up to date. The best custom rom in my opinion is CM7, but there are several available and most of them are good.
Mik's CM7. It's awesome.
Im using Nessy for 2 days now and its my first custom rom installed, I cant say its the best since i hadnt tried other roms, but so far im pretty satisfied with its performance. the default cpu clock is 729mhz max and I change it to 600mhz(stock) and the result is that battery consumption is now as good as the stock rom but with a little boost in performance and no bloatwares equals to increase in memory.
CM 7 + franco v19.2
I personally prefer CM7 By mik + fk
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
DJoptimus-One said:
I personally prefer CM7 By mik + fk
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use the latest threads... By me, tell more why u like the rom...
Sent from LGE Secret phone using tapatalk app... >DA×<
Which kernel is better .32 or .35???
in terms of battery and performance (as usual)??
As far as I know, .35 kernels are better than .32 kernels in both performance and battery.
In most cases newer versions are better only because of new features and improvements. Linux 3.0 is better than both, but nobody needs it since it need a full rewrite of the kernel tweaks from franciscofranco, mik_os, andy and fserve. At the moment our 2.6.35 kernels are less stable than the .32 ones, so I would advice you to use the .32 ones.
Depends on the user, but yep I think .35 is better in terms of performance but .32 is better in terms of battery life
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
In my opinion .35 has better both performance, and battery.
For the ones saying .35 has better battery life than .32, what ROM are you using, how long does the battery last and what's your usage pattern?
deetailed said:
For the ones saying .35 has better battery life than .32, what ROM are you using, how long does the battery last and what's your usage pattern?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would actually say that they are same in battery use. but .35 kernel have a really better performance than .32
thanx!! to all of you for your response..
I'm a heavy user my battery last 8 hours max...using 6.5.7+gbs18c
Now I've moved to 6.6.1+latest fk .35 kernel...
As far as I know. 35 kernels have slightly lesser battery than. 32 ..do post ur feedbacks on your experience with. 35,
Regards
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
androidusero1p500 said:
As far as I know. 35 kernels have slightly lesser battery than. 32 ..do post ur feedbacks on your experience with. 35,
Regards
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude play music on a rom with .35 kernel for one hour and do the same for .32 kernel.U will see .35 kernel uses less than half of battery as that of .32 kernel..
hey guys need ur recommendations for kernel......
using STOCK GINGERBREAD
NEEDS: better battery life, smooth UI, good multitouch, lag free gaming (angry bids, whers my water like that don't play the HD games)
plzzzzz... tell the best kernel for my needs...???? without any bugs...
n the download link also....
thanks......
[KERNEL][8 DEC] franco.Kernel | 2.6.35.14
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1148196
as Helldrak said
franco .35 kernel
yaa thanks but i've seen the thread.... people are complaining about choppy UI..... any other suggestion...???
navin.shah said:
yaa thanks but i've seen the thread.... people are complaining about choppy UI..... any other suggestion...???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can only have good gaming or smooth ui, and not both. i've tried the touchfix by franco and fserve in franco.Kernel-gbs.v20a, and it has the best performance in gaming so far compared to the previous kernel releases (tested game: blood & glory)
No one is perfect..
well franco's kernel is close to. try it.. you'll never know until you already experience it
Just like helldrak... the one in my signature... my 1st kernel... and now I am still using the new version of it
Well, used to have mik's 6.5.8, that was with goldenleaf
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
navin.shah said:
hey guys need ur recommendations for kernel......
using STOCK GINGERBREAD
NEEDS: better battery life, smooth UI, good multitouch, lag free gaming (angry bids, whers my water like that don't play the HD games)
plzzzzz... tell the best kernel for my needs...???? without any bugs...
n the download link also....
thanks......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco.Kernel 22NOV is the best for stock GB as it doesn't lag and is the fastest,,, 8DEC lags because it has a new touchscreen driver which solves the touch bug but slows the UI..
try rome v1.3.3!!!!
@OP, i made a discussion thread for recommendations like this for a reason
please read the stickies before making a thread
sweetnsour said:
@OP, i made a discussion thread for recommendations like this for a reason
please read the stickies before making a thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cmon sweet, you know noobs don't read, reading and extensive research is a learned characteristic
Any latest franco or fserve kernel will do, it depends on users perspective.... Personally I would rather have francos kernel, I've been using franco since v15 and it's never failed me
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Can you guys tell me the Pros and Cons of Paoulo, Francisco, Fserve [.35 Kernel] in comparison to one another? Like what does it lacks and what does it have, how r they different. And which is the best kernel for adfads N2 CM7 ROM according to you? Also I tried goggling for Paoulo's kernel and Rome kernel but couldn't find them. It maybe cause I don't understand Italian. So can you also tell me exactly how to get them?
Paolo - the great thing about it is the touchfix which is very good and not bad for scrolling, so good for gaming use.
Franco - the latest one is best for gaming use, but its not smooth. If you talk about previous versions, its have the best performance/battery life ratio.
Fserve - currently still in development, so we can't judge it yet.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Theres Rome kernel too, that is based on Paolo but with some improvements.
But Rome has some wakelocks during and after use wi-fi.
Nands_Borges said:
Theres Rome kernel too, that is based on Paolo but with some improvements.
But Rome has some wakelocks after during and after use wi-fi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it drains a lot of battery in WiFi. I'm using the 1.3.3 BFS V-Sync OFF with Oxygen 2.3.2 and the phone is really fast and smooth! No lag in 3D games, and without WiFi, the battery life is awesome (Governor LighassV2 OC 245/729)! Another bug that i found : doesn't work USB MASS but i don't know if is a rom related bug or kernel related but...BTW, fastest combination ever imho
Franco's kernel hands down. Paolo's (and possibly Rome's) kernel is just a ripoff from franco's kernel.
I hope fserve will eventually pick up franco's sources and improve it further.
which one has best batterylife and and which of them has best performance??????????????????????
iamawsm said:
which one has best batterylife and and which of them has best performance??????????????????????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rome Kernel.
iamawsm said:
which one has best batterylife and and which of them has best performance??????????????????????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco's kernel.
sweettaniyaa said:
Can you guys tell me the Pros and Cons of Paoulo, Francisco, Fserve [.35 Kernel] in comparison to one another? Like what does it lacks and what does it have, how r they different. And which is the best kernel for adfads N2 CM7 ROM according to you? Also I tried goggling for Paoulo's kernel and Rome kernel but couldn't find them. It maybe cause I don't understand Italian. So can you also tell me exactly how to get them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go with Franco's dude..
My kernel (based on Paolo source with battery driver from goldenleaf and many other patches)
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
thachtunganh said:
My kernel (based on Paolo source with battery driver from goldenleaf and many other patches)
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good so that's why u ask me for my kernel?
Don't forgrt to add support to andy clear cache option also check cyanogenmod our chip source by rmce.
aspee
For me, Paolo and Rome had blacks screen bug which was too annoying so went back to Franco.
aspee said:
Sounds good so that's why u ask me for my kernel?
Don't forgrt to add support to andy clear cache option also check cyanogenmod our chip source by rmce.
aspee
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean the Clear Ram feature?
Edit: and what is the meaning of "check cyanogenmod our chip source by rmce" ? i don't understand?
Bec de Xorbin said:
Franco's kernel hands down. Paolo's (and possibly Rome's) kernel is just a ripoff from franco's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF? Paolos .35 kernel come out first, with oc, camera flicker fix and wifi tethering fixed (came out broken on lg sources) so is very idiotic to say that is a rip off, I know that because i tested both kernels as soon they come out in that time.
Imho Paolo's kernel is way more stable than Franco's
Roqu3 said:
WTF? Paolos .35 kernel come out first, with oc, camera flicker fix and wifi tethering fixed (came out broken on lg sources) so is very idiotic to say that is a rip off, I know that because i tested both kernels as soon they come out in that time.
Imho Paolo's kernel is way more stable than Franco's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
thachtunganh said:
Do you mean the Clear Ram feature?
Edit: and what is the meaning of "check cyanogenmod our chip source by rmce" ? i don't understand?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah thar clear ram feature and i mean check this
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/lge-kernel-msm7x27
aspee
Roqu3 said:
WTF? Paolos .35 kernel come out first, with oc, camera flicker fix and wifi tethering fixed (came out broken on lg sources) so is very idiotic to say that is a rip off, I know that because i tested both kernels as soon they come out in that time.
Imho Paolo's kernel is way more stable than Franco's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
No kernel is a rip off of the other....
---------- Post added at 02:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------
aspee said:
Yeah thar clear ram feature and i mean check this
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/lge-kernel-msm7x27
aspee
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh , thanks for explaining and sharing, i didn't know that Cyanogenmod have this kernel source
Franco himself didn't say Paolo stole from him.
And
I don't respect Zack very much as he did not release any source code and thus violating GPL, and i remembered he himself said there is no reason to release source code, which I think it is idiotic. Also, most of his supposed 'patches' mostly came from franco(franco supposedly said had the same patches in his kernels for multiple devices).
santachaos said:
Franco himself didn't say Paolo stole from him.
And
I don't respect Zack very much as he did not release any source code and thus violating GPL, and i remembered he himself said there is no reason to release source code, which I think it is idiotic. Also, most of his supposed 'patches' mostly came from franco(franco supposedly said had the same patches in his kernels for multiple devices).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, I think Zack is a selfish people. But we can't force him to release his kernel source code...
BTW: How do you know that he used franco patches?
I flash the Rome 1.3.3 kernel yesterday on Cyanogen 7.2 N1, the performace is great, no blackscreen bug until now.
But the battery is not so good as franco kernel (12% in 3h, I need to wait until the end of day to see better and examine Better Battery Status).
So for now I recomend Rome if you don't care so much about battery.
So I noticed there are several versions of latest RoQ kernel:
[Descargar Kernel-XIII]
[Descargar Kernel-XIII Der Caveman ts driver]
[Descargar Kernel-XIII thachtungahn ts driver]
[Descargar Kernel-XIII Franco ts driver]
[Descargar Kernel-XIII Fserve ts driver]
[Descargar Kernel-XIII Paolo touchfix]
Which one do you use, which one do you think is the best one, why, which one gives you best of everything?
kernal
nahhh i hate them all(no offense any devs)
i use franco4 for battery and thundervn for performance
nothing else
Best one is the one with the original touch screen driver. Smooth as hell but may lag in games. For gaming use Paolo's touch fix.
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
opera38205 said:
nahhh i hate them all(no offense any devs)
i use franco4 for battery and thundervn for performance
nothing else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool story bro, but that's not what I was asking...
Anyways I flashed the first one, and I'm using 748/480 conservative and feel a bit lag...
trial and error is the only way u can find out what suits u, other people may have different needs..
ccdreadcc said:
trial and error is the only way u can find out what suits u, other people may have different needs..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea that's what I was thinking about doing but I asked if someone maybe did that before so he could share his opinion about battery,performance and overall feel of kernel