Paoulo vs Fransico vs Fserve vs Rome kernel [.35 Kernel] - Optimus One, P500, V General

Can you guys tell me the Pros and Cons of Paoulo, Francisco, Fserve [.35 Kernel] in comparison to one another? Like what does it lacks and what does it have, how r they different. And which is the best kernel for adfads N2 CM7 ROM according to you? Also I tried goggling for Paoulo's kernel and Rome kernel but couldn't find them. It maybe cause I don't understand Italian. So can you also tell me exactly how to get them?

Paolo - the great thing about it is the touchfix which is very good and not bad for scrolling, so good for gaming use.
Franco - the latest one is best for gaming use, but its not smooth. If you talk about previous versions, its have the best performance/battery life ratio.
Fserve - currently still in development, so we can't judge it yet.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App

Theres Rome kernel too, that is based on Paolo but with some improvements.
But Rome has some wakelocks during and after use wi-fi.

Nands_Borges said:
Theres Rome kernel too, that is based on Paolo but with some improvements.
But Rome has some wakelocks after during and after use wi-fi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it drains a lot of battery in WiFi. I'm using the 1.3.3 BFS V-Sync OFF with Oxygen 2.3.2 and the phone is really fast and smooth! No lag in 3D games, and without WiFi, the battery life is awesome (Governor LighassV2 OC 245/729)! Another bug that i found : doesn't work USB MASS but i don't know if is a rom related bug or kernel related but...BTW, fastest combination ever imho

Franco's kernel hands down. Paolo's (and possibly Rome's) kernel is just a ripoff from franco's kernel.
I hope fserve will eventually pick up franco's sources and improve it further.

which one has best batterylife and and which of them has best performance??????????????????????

iamawsm said:
which one has best batterylife and and which of them has best performance??????????????????????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rome Kernel.

iamawsm said:
which one has best batterylife and and which of them has best performance??????????????????????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco's kernel.

sweettaniyaa said:
Can you guys tell me the Pros and Cons of Paoulo, Francisco, Fserve [.35 Kernel] in comparison to one another? Like what does it lacks and what does it have, how r they different. And which is the best kernel for adfads N2 CM7 ROM according to you? Also I tried goggling for Paoulo's kernel and Rome kernel but couldn't find them. It maybe cause I don't understand Italian. So can you also tell me exactly how to get them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go with Franco's dude..

My kernel (based on Paolo source with battery driver from goldenleaf and many other patches)
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App

thachtunganh said:
My kernel (based on Paolo source with battery driver from goldenleaf and many other patches)
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good so that's why u ask me for my kernel?
Don't forgrt to add support to andy clear cache option also check cyanogenmod our chip source by rmce.
aspee

For me, Paolo and Rome had blacks screen bug which was too annoying so went back to Franco.

aspee said:
Sounds good so that's why u ask me for my kernel?
Don't forgrt to add support to andy clear cache option also check cyanogenmod our chip source by rmce.
aspee
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean the Clear Ram feature?
Edit: and what is the meaning of "check cyanogenmod our chip source by rmce" ? i don't understand?

Bec de Xorbin said:
Franco's kernel hands down. Paolo's (and possibly Rome's) kernel is just a ripoff from franco's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF? Paolos .35 kernel come out first, with oc, camera flicker fix and wifi tethering fixed (came out broken on lg sources) so is very idiotic to say that is a rip off, I know that because i tested both kernels as soon they come out in that time.
Imho Paolo's kernel is way more stable than Franco's

Roqu3 said:
WTF? Paolos .35 kernel come out first, with oc, camera flicker fix and wifi tethering fixed (came out broken on lg sources) so is very idiotic to say that is a rip off, I know that because i tested both kernels as soon they come out in that time.
Imho Paolo's kernel is way more stable than Franco's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk

thachtunganh said:
Do you mean the Clear Ram feature?
Edit: and what is the meaning of "check cyanogenmod our chip source by rmce" ? i don't understand?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah thar clear ram feature and i mean check this
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/lge-kernel-msm7x27
aspee

Roqu3 said:
WTF? Paolos .35 kernel come out first, with oc, camera flicker fix and wifi tethering fixed (came out broken on lg sources) so is very idiotic to say that is a rip off, I know that because i tested both kernels as soon they come out in that time.
Imho Paolo's kernel is way more stable than Franco's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
No kernel is a rip off of the other....
---------- Post added at 02:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------
aspee said:
Yeah thar clear ram feature and i mean check this
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/lge-kernel-msm7x27
aspee
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh , thanks for explaining and sharing, i didn't know that Cyanogenmod have this kernel source

Franco himself didn't say Paolo stole from him.
And
I don't respect Zack very much as he did not release any source code and thus violating GPL, and i remembered he himself said there is no reason to release source code, which I think it is idiotic. Also, most of his supposed 'patches' mostly came from franco(franco supposedly said had the same patches in his kernels for multiple devices).

santachaos said:
Franco himself didn't say Paolo stole from him.
And
I don't respect Zack very much as he did not release any source code and thus violating GPL, and i remembered he himself said there is no reason to release source code, which I think it is idiotic. Also, most of his supposed 'patches' mostly came from franco(franco supposedly said had the same patches in his kernels for multiple devices).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, I think Zack is a selfish people. But we can't force him to release his kernel source code...
BTW: How do you know that he used franco patches?

I flash the Rome 1.3.3 kernel yesterday on Cyanogen 7.2 N1, the performace is great, no blackscreen bug until now.
But the battery is not so good as franco kernel (12% in 3h, I need to wait until the end of day to see better and examine Better Battery Status).
So for now I recomend Rome if you don't care so much about battery.

Related

[Q] Possible multi"kernel" boot?

Really want to congratulate Tasssadar for his multirom
After thinking about the whole concept about dual booting for awhile, an idea came to me. Of course this might just be wishful thinking, but is it possible to dual boot a kernel? The reason why I would want such a thing is because some kernels are better than other kernels in specific "fields" (some are performance-oriented, some are not performance-oriented but do pack a good number of fixes for let's say the axis inversion bug and cpu lag fix; btw i am, in no way, trying to degrade any kernel).
Now I would give this a shot myself if it weren't for my lack of knowledge in android development
sweetnsour said:
Really want to congratulate Tasssadar for his multirom
After thinking about the whole concept about dual booting for awhile, an idea came to me. Of course this might just be wishful thinking, but is it possible to dual boot a kernel? The reason why I would want such a thing is because some kernels are better than other kernels in specific "fields" (some are performance-oriented, some are not performance-oriented but do pack a good number of fixes for let's say the axis inversion bug and cpu lag fix; btw i am, in no way, trying to degrade any kernel).
Now I would give this a shot myself if it weren't for my lack of knowledge in android development
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what i see from the thread
.void 2.3.4 and stock V20B
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...isn't that multi kernel(.32 and .35) or not...?
Actually from what I think we should move on to .35 kernel, no point still using .32. Franco should add the fix for axis inversion in his .35 kernel, then i dont think we need multiboot kernel as it has the best of both worlds(battery and performance)
terratrix said:
Franco should add the fix for axis inversion in his .35 kernel, then i dont think we need multiboot kernel as it has the best of both worlds(battery and performance)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you knew what kernel and bug i had in mind
if franco added the axis inversion bug and cpu lag fix bug to his kernel, there would be no reason why people would use other kernels. of course that is entirely up to him
Which kernel do you use??
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
androidusero1p500 said:
Which kernel do you use??
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
franco.kernel v1.1 02102011
performance is great, but i really like the axis inversion and cpu bugfixes in paolo's kernel
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think it's kind of impossible because Kernel is the first thing loaded after baseband
Ny way to fix mulotioucj bug..
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
The idea sounds good as I wish cm7 came with .35 kernels and not .32's
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
virusshah97 said:
Ny way to fix mulotioucj bug..
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fail dunno what **** you are talking about.

Which kernal is good for CM7

I have been playing games on cm7 but it gets really to hot and the battery backup is also not that good. So guys which kernal can be good for CM7? ?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Depends on the game, but its normal to get warm/hot when playing for some time. All kernels are pretty good, so you have to just try them and see which is best for you. Have you tried downclocking the speed to 1000MHz?
Kaze105 said:
Depends on the game, but its normal to get warm/hot when playing for some time. All kernels are pretty good, so you have to just try them and see which is best for you. Have you tried downclocking the speed to 1000MHz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope i havent ..!
do you really need to ask what kernel is best for cm7...siyah kernel of course. Gokhanmoral as stated on his thread his kernel is compatible so why not use that
hmm. i also think Gokhanormal kernel (Syah Kernel http://www.gokhanmoral.com/gm/ ) or Speedmods Kernel (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1182498) might be good for u.
greets
snOwjAwk said:
hmm. i also think Gokhanormal kernel (Syah Kernel http://www.gokhanmoral.com/gm/ ) or Speedmods Kernel (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1182498) might be good for u.
greets
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SpeedMod doesn't work on any AOSP ROM. So it won't work on CM7.
Stifler69 said:
do you really need to ask what kernel is best for cm7...siyah kernel of course. Gokhanmoral as stated on his thread his kernel is compatible so why not use that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thn u and all u guys for helping me out

Codeworkx 3.0.25 Kernel Vs Siyah

Was just basically wondering, as of now, which one seems to be the best?
Anyone tried both?
Siayh is an optimized version of Samsung source code. Codeworkxx version is built from scratch by xploidwild and the team.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
What do you think would be better on AOKP?
superleeds27 said:
What do you think would be better on AOKP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whatever that comes with stock is better as of now , wait for a few weeks or month to get some stable custom kernels.
Not sure i agree, Stock kernel is terrible.
codeworkx kernel is really good
superleeds27 said:
Was just basically wondering, as of now, which one seems to be the best?
Anyone tried both?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for me is SIYAH the best with para's aokp best battery life and very stable
btw tested netchips too
superleeds27 said:
Not sure i agree, Stock kernel is terrible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats wrong with the stock kernel?

[Q] What is the best kernel for oxygen 2.7?

,What is the best kernel for oxygen 2.7 regarding for battery life,i use my phone now only for texting and i want it to last long,can you give suggestions?,
Franco kernel
Sent from my Xoom tablet using Tapatalk
Personally, I find ROQ XII the best kernel as it has more governors. I know that Franco did say that governors didn't matter, but from my personal experience, I disagree with his statement.
ta-gb kernel version 1 is the best!. in my opinion ONLY
miuiandroidfan said:
Personally, I find ROQ XII the best kernel as it has more governors. I know that Franco did say that governors didn't matter, but from my personal experience, I disagree with his statement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
,im using RoqXII now so far so good,^^,RoqXIII-paolo touchfix is not that good to mine,franco kernel 4 gives almost the same battery life as of stock oxygen,i dont tried ta-gb 1.1 yet but im happy now with RoqXII,^^
I agree with ta being the best
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
,i will try now ta-gb 1.0,

Dorinmax 7.4 the perfect kernel

Hi I'm on the new 7.4 version with stock 5.02 android... Really the phone flies!!
And you've made a new thread to tell us about this ?
Eselter said:
And you've made a new thread to tell us about this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is just a newbie i think :highfive:
Innecesary post.
Enviado desde mi LG-D802 mediante Tapatalk
what makes it so perfect in compare to other kernals?
xtract1 said:
what makes it so perfect in compare to other kernals?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well you can read all the features it has all the hotplugs, governors. and tweaks. if you using stock try and see for yourself, not everyone is the same so yu make like it o dont.
eehhg.. 7.8 as of now.
check this post for last update. whats been merge into kernel still a beta stage.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=64293656&postcount=6232
I had 2 G2 one with stock kernel and other with dorimanx kernel (default settings) both on stock ROM and compared the two side by side. Stock kernel was much faster and did not show signs of lagg like dorimanx did.
I tested the kernels in real life testing, that matters more than the number of commits
Just sharing my experiences, nothing else.
metteduch said:
I had 2 G2 one with stock kernel and other with dorimanx kernel (default settings) both on stock ROM and compared the two side by side. Stock kernel was much faster and did not show signs of lagg like dorimanx did.
I tested the kernels in real life testing, that matters more than the number of commits
Just sharing my experiences, nothing else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dorimanx usually gives better battery so it must come at a cost of performance...lots of people love dorimanx kernel but my experience was kinda like yours...had lags where i didnt have with the stock kernel or furnace kernel(on kitkat). No disrespect, he is a great dev though
migueldbr said:
Dorimanx usually gives better battery so it must come at a cost of performance...lots of people love dorimanx kernel but my experience was kinda like yours...had lags where i didnt have with the stock kernel or furnace kernel(on kitkat). No disrespect, he is a great dev though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as stated before no one is the same ,we are all different but out of you 2 againts hundreds or thousands of users think different..
raptorddd said:
as stated before no one is the same ,we are all different but out of you 2 againts hundreds or thousands of users think different..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol did you even read my post? thats exactly what i said, lots of people love dorimanx kernel and he is a great dev but my experience was the same as the guy i quoted. It does not mean that the kernel is not good

Categories

Resources