Related
Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I am also interested since I have seen working ports already for my electrify and some progress for the nook color
Sent from my lil electric mopho using XDA App
look at dalingrin's twitter for updates.
If you're wondering about ICS on the touchpad...look at dalingrin's twitter posts.
If you're looking for CM9, all i know is they've released a pre-alpha version of the launcher from CM9 for Devices with ICS....how far that puts them down the line to finishing it? I do not know but i'm waiting too (impatiently)
Here is the official source of CM news:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/
I would imagine any general news on CM9 will be all over once its out. I saw the news on the launcher in at least 3 different sites within hours of the announcement.
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
T-Keith said:
Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The most obvious place would be:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/:rolleyes:
EDIT: I was reheating dinner, and someone just posted the same while my food was being warmed. Sry for the double post
T-Keith said:
Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like how that was worded, it is truly rough. Phone versions of android do work on tablets but its clearly wrong.
The Jack of Clubs said:
I like how that was worded, it is truly rough. Phone versions of android do work on tablets but its clearly wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed Leo and Scott are doing a great job at developing cm7/MIUI to work on a tablet as best it can.. But it is almost a lost cause since ics is already on a lot of devices....
I'm sure modifying a kanged ROM is a lot easier than making a port/SDK ROM as a lot of the drivers have to be made from scratch... I've given up on android on the TP till ICS. When that happens ill donate a handsome reward to the team that does it.. till then... WebOS will have to do... As I only use it for media/web I'm good for now... I have a EVO 3d for apps and such that android excels in...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
@dalingrin I know you don't give ETAs on anything, but is the ICS build anywhere close to GB Alpha 1? Thanks.
@dalingrin:
@SyncV2 Primary issues are GPU rendering under some circumstances and video playback. Hope to finally get back to working on it tonight.
Having just come from the inspire 4g, I've had the luxury of having asopx, which if you search their forum you'll see its as close to Google source as possible with all the cm crap gutted, I've been hoping to see one pop up over here but didn't know if perhaps there just wasn't any demand here in Samsung land. Anyway the phone is awesome, just dislike touchwiz, and want the bare bones stock look and feel of ics, to which I can then customize from there. Seems like all the roms thus far have traces of touchwiz and or tons of cm tweaks and apex lanuchers and all that nonsense that we should have the ability to add from a bare bones build, kinda like a foundation to then just customize from there.
Please show some love if you want this as well, would gladly donate for some dev to get on it :beer::beer:
CM9 and AOKP are the closest things you will get to a pure AOSP OS.
If you wanted guaranteed pure AOSP, you should've bought a Nexus device.
BTW, that "CM crap" as you put it, vastly improves the ability of the OS. As does (and this is my opinion only) Touchwiz4.
Why don't you build your own op if you're not happy with what's offered.
NJGSII said:
Why don't you build your own op if you're not happy with what's offered.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Instead of criticizing why not try helping? There actually is a pure AOSP based ROM that we recently got support for named Codename Android. I'm not sure if it 100% running on our phone yet but they are working to do so.
Link to discussion: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1570962
Link to homepage: http://codenameandroid.org/
PatriotXT92 said:
Link to discussion: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1570962
Link to homepage: http://codenameandroid.org/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Codename Android on my Nexus S [link] is really nice. It was one of my favorites. If we could see that (at some point) on our phones, that would be awesome.
I built and ran AOSP ICS 4.0.3 for my Nexus S and I have to say that while I did it just to see it work, I didn't run it long as I missed the features that CM and other open-source projects such as Codename Android have to offer. But, to each their own.
Just my $.02.
AOKP is about as close as you're going to get. Try it, you wont regret it.
Red5 said:
AOKP is about as close as you're going to get. Try it, you wont regret it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed......by far the best ICS Rom
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
XXtremeAzzKicker said:
Agreed......by far the best ICS Rom
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Sorry if this post came off as if I was some form of elitiest, I was merely suggesting that if we had a nice bare bones build people can thank tweak as they saw fit, I do not claim to be an Android developer and if I could I would love to build what I'm requesting, unfortunately I do not posses those skills ,hence attempting to lure in unsuspecting developers with donations as I do respect and understand the amount of developers that do this in their spare time while maintaining real life jobs. Secondly, my past experience with cm has been poor with the inspire, perhaps it was just not as highly regarded in the inspire space as it is elsewhere. Cm just didn't play that well with that device, perhaps I was too quick to judge having moved devices.
For those on akop, is it the stock launcher, email, and messaging apps? They don't have any screen shots? I'd like to get away from touchwiz
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
AOKP is an aosp build, you will not see anything tw related in the rom
datrumole said:
Sorry if this post came off as if I was some form of elitiest, I was merely suggesting that if we had a nice bare bones build people can thank tweak as they saw fit, I do not claim to be an Android developer and if I could I would love to build what I'm requesting, unfortunately I do not posses those skills ,hence attempting to lure in unsuspecting developers with donations as I do respect and understand the amount of developers that do this in their spare time while maintaining real life jobs. Secondly, my past experience with cm has been poor with the inspire, perhaps it was just not as highly regarded in the inspire space as it is elsewhere. Cm just didn't play that well with that device, perhaps I was too quick to judge having moved devices.
For those on akop, is it the stock launcher, email, and messaging apps? They don't have any screen shots? I'd like to get away from touchwiz
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's all right man.
AOKP uses the Vanilla ICS launcher, not touchwiz.
raduque said:
BTW, that "CM crap" as you put it, vastly improves the ability of the OS. As does (and this is my opinion only) Touchwiz4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I share this opinion. I can honestly say if I had to choose between my GS II and the Galaxy Nexus with a locked boot loader, and not rootable, I would take the GS II every time. I would not choose to run Stock ICS over CM9, AOKP, or like stated above, TouchWiz (on ICS).
As others said give AOKP a try. Its definitely daily driver stable and complete. It looks like stock ICS but adds so many features. Things like the power toggles in the notification shade, adding apps to the lock screen as shortcuts, the list is huge. I can't make a firm decision between SHOstock2 and AOKP. I spend a week on one, then swap, repeat. I think people give TW a hard time. Its not sense, its not in your face and leeching into every part of the phone. Its really subtle once you put on a different launcher, even the official att builds. When I run AOKP I miss the TW music player (with controls in the lock screen and notification shade), the video player, and the camera more than anything else. When I run TW builds I miss the people/phone app and calendar. Those are the differences to me between TW and AOSP, a vast majority of the ICS experience is the same in the two.
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
datrumole said:
Sorry if this post came off as if I was some form of elitiest, I was merely suggesting that if we had a nice bare bones build people can thank tweak as they saw fit, I do not claim to be an Android developer and if I could I would love to build what I'm requesting, unfortunately I do not posses those skills ,hence attempting to lure in unsuspecting developers with donations as I do respect and understand the amount of developers that do this in their spare time while maintaining real life jobs. Secondly, my past experience with cm has been poor with the inspire, perhaps it was just not as highly regarded in the inspire space as it is elsewhere. Cm just didn't play that well with that device, perhaps I was too quick to judge having moved devices.
For those on akop, is it the stock launcher, email, and messaging apps? They don't have any screen shots? I'd like to get away from touchwiz
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone in here is telling you to go with AOKP. Its as "bare bones" as you can get with stock ICS. There is in TouchWiz whatsoever in AOKP. All the drivers are in there to make all the functions of your phone work. Go try it. Now.
I wish we had a pure AOSP rom also. I really dislike AOKP.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Red5 said:
Go try it. Now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
trell959 said:
I really dislike AOKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why?
yup. try out aokp.
insaneturbo13 said:
why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know really. I just didn't like it. I may give it another go tonight
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
trell959 said:
I don't know really. I just didn't like it. I may give it another go tonight
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can always try MysticPride.
trell959 said:
I wish we had a pure AOSP rom also. I really dislike AOKP.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you really dislike aokp then you would really dislike aosp
International Note. MIUI with all the Samsung apps working!! Can someone port one of these? I would if I had any idea how to do it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738632
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1688646
synergeticink said:
International Note. MIUI with all the Samsung apps working!! Can someone port one of these? I would if I had any idea how to do it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...highlight=i717
http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...highlight=memo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this would be fantastic!!
Maybe post this in the forum for the international Note.
Or did I miss something?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
alperin1 said:
Maybe post this in the forum for the international Note.
Or did I miss something?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What would that achieve? Our Devs would have to port it, not theres, doubt they even have our phone.
You'd probably have to beg a miui dev....
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
kinghorsey said:
You'd probably have to beg a miui dev....
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmmm...lol...was reading the development threads to see how easy it would be for a noob at dev-ing like my self to do it. The only factor that bothers me is not knowing the ins and outs of linux/ios desktop software.
Sounds and looks difficult. The Spen stuff is dependant on Touchwiz. So that must mean they somehow got all the touchwiz dependencies working in an AOSP based ROM, without needing an actual stock ROM
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Sinful Animosity said:
Sounds and looks difficult. The Spen stuff is dependant on Touchwiz. So that must mean they somehow got all the touchwiz dependencies working in an AOSP based ROM, without needing an actual stock ROM
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be awesome though, wonder why the links don't work anymore.
So I reached out to Gerrett the Dev who put together the Vengeance Note Edition MIUI Rom (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1688646). He said he might be up for the challenge but he needs to know the differences between the International and ATT note from a Dev stand point, and will need volenteers to test the rom and send log cats. I expressed my interest in offering my help and I sure others will join in, but I just need some help from one of our Devs to turn to when he has questions about our device. Any Devs interested in helping out?
Seriously, what if we never officially get JB? Will we just have to rely on the N4 conversion? Will it affect development?
And how angry will you be?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
I will be so mad bro
Sent from my Nocturnal'd Optimus G
Well I'll never be getting another LG device, for one. At least I assume it's LG's fault
But, I'll be running CM when it comes thanks to the devs so it won't be too much of a factor for me. Now if it's a factor for the devs, that's another story... Then I will be severely pissed off
____
Sent from my LG Original Gangsta
theres already a few JB roms based on our phone, just not the att variants. im currently waiting for a base JB after the official one drops, but if that doesnt happen, ill just use the canadian one
blenkows said:
Well I'll never be getting another LG device, for one. At least I assume it's LG's fault
But, I'll be running CM when it comes thanks to the devs so it won't be too much of a factor for me. Now if it's a factor for the devs, that's another story... Then I will be severely pissed off
____
Sent from my LG Original Gangsta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. My next device will also not be carrier branded. I'm sick of this s***! :silly:
blenkows said:
At least I assume it's LG's fault
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. This is AT&T, like normal. Since they have a Jellybean build for several of the other variants, I am sure we are just waiting on AT&T to add all their bloatware to it.
SnowLeopardJB said:
Nope. This is AT&T, like normal. Since they have a Jellybean build for several of the other variants, I am sure we are just waiting on AT&T to add all their bloatware to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope a dev on here can add bloatware in a few minutes code it properly in a few day day so I'm sure an entire team of programmers at at&t can do this fast enough. It's marketing on Googles behalf. They have the moderately inferior nexus which has jelly bean 4.2.1 if they update the og to jelly bean what's the point in getting a nexus?
Sent from my LG-F180K using xda premium
HyDRo1X said:
Nope a dev on here can add bloatware in a few minutes code it properly in a few day day so I'm sure an entire team of programmers at at&t can do this fast enough. It's marketing on Googles behalf. They have the moderately inferior nexus which has jelly bean 4.2.1 if they update the og to jelly bean what's the point in getting a nexus?
Sent from my LG-F180K using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The xperia z is launching with 4.2 soooo that excuse is bogus, we just want 4.1 ha
HyDRo1X said:
Nope a dev on here can add bloatware in a few minutes code it properly in a few day day so I'm sure an entire team of programmers at at&t can do this fast enough. It's marketing on Googles behalf. They have the moderately inferior nexus which has jelly bean 4.2.1 if they update the og to jelly bean what's the point in getting a nexus?
Sent from my LG-F180K using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
? Hmmm I don't know, maybe because it's not carrier branded, a clean-slate version of Android, and significantly cheaper to buy off-contract... Seems to me like there's still plenty of incentive to buy the N4 regardless if the OG has JB or not.
Whatever the reason, I really like this phone and am glad I bought it. However, unless things change before my contract is up, I'll avoid LG like the plague when choosing my next device. There is no reason anyone can give to me...to me... not anyone else, that in my mind justifies this piece of hardware not having official JB released for it by now. The work the developers are doing with one hand tied behind their back is awesome, but it shouldn't have to come to this. I'll vote with my dollars next time and go back to Samsung. It's a shame, too.
Like what has been mentioned and discussed ad nauseum since December, this device very well could have shipped with JB if they wanted it to. It most certainly could have been upgraded by now, especially with international versions of JB out. That tells me it is 100% AT&T who is holding this up.
Have a great weekend! Can't wait to see what the devs have cooked up!
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
chrisphoenix7 said:
Seriously, what if we never officially get JB? Will we just have to rely on the N4 conversion? Will it affect development?
And how angry will you be?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you really feel the need to complain about jellybean in 2 diff threads. This thread is a waste of space. You just created a topic in general and now q&a. Come on bro
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
ATT is probably too busy updating the note, note2, s3, one x, and all the other big selling devices. That said, looking at LG open source site there is only one device showing more than one os update, and that was froyo to gingerbread to ice cream sandwich. So jellybean will probably be the end of official updates for this phone.
Hint's the reason to why I swtched from this to the note 2 plus the fact that it's just a sweet ass phone lol so smooth n fast has a better pic to than the LG sound is better everything is lol Lg just sucks on upgrading there stuff that's all it really is Stuiped SOB's lmao
foreverthewolf2012 said:
Hint's the reason to why I swtched from this to the note 2 plus the fact that it's just a sweet ass phone lol so smooth n fast has a better pic to than the LG sound is better everything is lol Lg just sucks on upgrading there stuff that's all it really is Stuiped SOB's lmao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In this case it's AT&T. If our developers can reverse engineer a hack to convert this to an N4, the mfg could have put JB on this device with the schematics and kernel files in their possession from day one. There are no two ways about it, simple as that. I mean they built both phones at the same time with almost identical specs for crying out loud..
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
LG? At&t They know what they can both go do It start's with f and ends with U lmfao
crward said:
The xperia z is launching with 4.2 soooo that excuse is bogus, we just want 4.1 ha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope because xperia is Sony nexus 4 and LG og is both by lg
Sent from my LG-F180K using xda premium
HyDRo1X said:
Nope because xperia is Sony nexus 4 and LG og is both by lg
Sent from my LG-F180K using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But as far as I know, Google is mostly responsible for the N4 software and LG is mostly responsible for the OG.
Google shouldn't have anything to do with us not seeing an update, just like how the N4 users aren't thanking LG for their updates.
Justinfedor said:
So you really feel the need to complain about jellybean in 2 diff threads. This thread is a waste of space. You just created a topic in general and now q&a. Come on bro
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't make this thread to complain. I was just curious. I had to call AT&T on another matter, asked about JellyBean, and then posted the other, not to complain, just to report.
Sent from my LG-E970 using 2 hot dogs and some duct tape.
I wouldnt hold my breath. Converted when the method first came out and have never look back. I don't know why people are so scare of bricking Im yet to see some one bricking their phone converting and in case you didnt know there is always a chance of bricking even if you are just flashing a simple script all it takes is a simple mistake... why do you think devs always have disclaimers on their roms???? I'm just waiting for 5.0 to drop and you will see a ton of people converting. No one likes old news man same goes for phones why would you want to stay on an outdated OS? makes no sence.
foreverthewolf2012 said:
Hint's the reason to why I swtched from this to the note 2 plus the fact that it's just a sweet ass phone lol so smooth n fast has a better pic to than the LG sound is better everything is lol Lg just sucks on upgrading there stuff that's all it really is Stuiped SOB's lmao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Each to their own... I have a note 2,think it sucks ass. Too big, amoled screen has poor color reproduction, plastic land...
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
As the One X on our beloved AT&t received 4.1 today, I take it as a sign we too shall receive it!
In 8 to 10 business months.
This was meant as a stress relief exercise. Please do not over exert from laughter.
Also, I know many out there hate stock with a passion. Let's keep this thread free of angry insults and hurled accusations. Thank ya much.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
AT&T wont release jelly bean for LGOG til the pro comes out. they want people to buy a new device and renew their contracts with the pro. less people would with LGOG having jelly bean.
Personally, I don't think AT&T cares what devices are out, they make their money on contracts, not devices.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
freebee269 said:
AT&T wont release jelly bean for LGOG til the pro comes out. they want people to buy a new device and renew their contracts with the pro. less people would with LGOG having jelly bean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally don't agree with this.
The vast majority of consumers don't know what version of android is on what device.
They won't even know.
And it shouldn't matter what device people buy, as long as they extend their contracts.
Also, stock isn't too bad on this phone.
I seriously could not care less when we have a ROM that's pretty much exactly what the stock update is going to be with SnowJB. Plus we've got AOSP, AOKP, and CM10 on the way. Not to mention The Base and other ROMs I'm neglecting to mention. If you're on XDA you likely don't need an official Jellybean release. I'm not a huge fan of this news being posted all over. We have better updates than what will ever come out. Who cares?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
chrisphoenix7 said:
As the One X on our beloved AT&t received 4.1 today, I take it as a sign we too shall receive it!
In 8 to 10 business months.
This was meant as a stress relief exercise. Please do not over exert from laughter.
Also, I know many out there hate stock with a passion. Let's keep this thread free of angry insults and hurled accusations. Thank ya much.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cmon, buddy. Didn't you just ask to have a nearly identical thread closed?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Sprint is rolling out the 4.1 update to their LGOG now.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
I care. Official release means official source. Snowjb is great but official release would be better
gunnyman said:
I care. Official release means official source. Snowjb is great but official release would be better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought they had 6 months to release official source once they put out an update...
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
TangoXray said:
Cmon, buddy. Didn't you just ask to have a nearly identical thread closed?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This one was meant to be more of a joke thread, as I stated earlier. I was being sarcastic. I was poking fun at the earlier thread.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Jank4AU said:
I thought they had 6 months to release official source once they put out an update...
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
... And wasn't there a problem with the source code being released in a manner that was difficult to work with?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
bleached45 said:
I personally don't agree with this.
The vast majority of consumers don't know what version of android is on what device.
They won't even know.
And it shouldn't matter what device people buy, as long as they extend their contracts.
Also, stock isn't too bad on this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know any android user that doesn't know what version of android is on their device. I can think of atleast 20 people. Most people are educated enough these days to know what they have and what newer version is out. They may not know how to root or modify like my sister but she does know when her iPhone doesn't have the newest iOS.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
freebee269 said:
I don't know any android user that doesn't know what version of android is on their device. I can think of atleast 20 people. Most people are educated enough these days to know what they have and what newer version is out. They may not know how to root or modify like my sister but she does know when her iPhone doesn't have the newest iOS.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then it seems most of my acquaintances... are not super bright.
But in all honesty, the everyday consumer really doesn't know. With Android so fragmented and most devices hardly receiving updates, I can think of a lot of people I know that don't know. They aren't tech people, they just want a smartphone.
I've had to walk friends through getting to the about phone settings just so they could find out what version they were on.
On iOS devices, everybody (or just about) has the latest update available to them; and even then, they really don't know what the hell is going on.
It is amazing how many people out there don't know much of anything about technology, and have no idea what their devices are capable of.
who needs att to release jb when snowjb is already here and its wonderfully debloated!
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
The fact that sprint is releasing right now but it seems that att isn't even close has me fuming. I know there are great releases out there but I'm just mad because it seems that att doesn't care at all
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
How long did it take att to release an update for the LG Thrill? That might be a good guesstimate for the Optimus G...
Took them 8 mo from the release of the one x (July to march) for this JB.
I also like to use my Inspire as an example. Promised Jellybean, and it was a giant no-show. Thank god for our Devs.
C2fifield said:
I also like to use my Inspire as an example. Promised Jellybean, and it was a giant no-show. Thank god for our Devs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny thing is, neither AT&T nor HTC said ICS was coming to the Inspire, only HTC said it then retracted it for the Desire HD, international version.
Such a mess these updates are.
abraxo said:
The fact that sprint is releasing right now but it seems that att isn't even close has me fuming. I know there are great releases out there but I'm just mad because it seems that att doesn't care at all
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's clear from what we've seen from other carriers around the world, that the lack of official Jellybean is totally on AT&T. I love this phone, but it looks like the only way to keep current is to depend on our devs and with brand new shiny coming out very soon I suspect we will lose quite a few of them. I realize brand new shiny phones are always coming out, but the next crop of devices are slated to be real power houses.
iamtha1 said:
who needs att to release jb when snowjb is already here and its wonderfully debloated!
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do...I'm over flashing ROM's that have half working features or the occasional bug that causes my phone to reboot in the middle of a game or phone call.