Hello mates,
I want one favour from you all good people here. I have sold out my HTC wildfire and planning to buy a mini st15i.
So basically I require some information before purchasing, like the length of the phone, battery back up, Armv6 or Armv7, gaming experience, music quality, etc.
However I have kept my eye on Zte Blade also but will probably go for mini st15i.
Also how are the experiences of rooting ,custom roms and modifications.
Please reply and give your valuable suggestions.
Regards
Shiv
Length of mini would be shorter than X8, but the screen is same size with X8 and multi-touch(max 4 touches), and also thicker than X8.
Battery see your usage, as my record on testing my Xperia mini maximum battery life is 2 days++.
This phone got a ARMv7 processor which is Qualcomm MSM8255, and also got Adreno 205 GPU as while..
Although I'm not so free to play game, but it can play heavy game such as SHADOWGUN.
Music quality still OK, and It got a 5MP camera, and also 720p HD video recording and playback.
About rooting if u get a .62 firmware Xperia mini, u must downgrade to .42 firmware via flashtool, getting root and update to .62 firmware via OTA update
Xperia mini is Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8250, MSM8255 is Xperia mini pro...
Sent from my SK17i using XDA
sss2sssss said:
Length of mini would be shorter than X8, but the screen is same size with X8 and multi-touch(max 4 touches), and also thicker than X8.
Battery see your usage, as my record on testing my Xperia mini maximum battery life is 2 days++.
This phone got a ARMv7 processor which is Qualcomm MSM8255, and also got Adreno 205 GPU as while..
Although I'm not so free to play game, but it can play heavy game such as SHADOWGUN.
Music quality still OK, and It got a 5MP camera, and also 720p HD video recording and playback.
About rooting if u get a .62 firmware Xperia mini, u must downgrade to .42 firmware via flashtool, getting root and update to .62 firmware via OTA update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xperia mini is Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8250, not MSM8255, MSM8255 is Xperia mini pro...
Sent from my SK17i using XDA
Personally after owning the LWW for three months I would take the Blade any day. I like the hardware, But the screen is way to small for me. I had a Galaxy Ace before hand and despite how slow it was I would take it back.. Something about Sony's UI I just don't like! I have CM7 currently installed on my LWW, It makes the phone so much better, But the battery life is really poor unfortunately .
What spec. does the Blade have in your country? I know in the UK we have the 7227 600mhz/512mb ram which is quite poor now a days..
It's all up to you however
AlvinZahran98 said:
Xperia mini is Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8250, not MSM8255, MSM8255 is Xperia mini pro...
Sent from my SK17i using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But if is QSD8250, is Adreno 200 onboard...
if is MSM8255, is Adreno 205 onboard, and Xperia mini got a Adreno 205 GPU wor...
sss2sssss said:
But if is QSD8250, is Adreno 200 onboard...
if is MSM8255, is Adreno 205 onboard, and Xperia mini got a Adreno 205 GPU wor...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the QSD8250 not the X10i? Because the Desire has one too? :s
I thought all 2011 Xperias' had the MSM8255?
Picture captured from my Xperia mini
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And also inform of QSD8250 and MSM8255:
QSD8250:http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a8250&c=qualcomm_snapdragon_qsd8250
MSM8255:http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a8255&c=qualcomm_snapdragon_msm8255
---------- Post added at 12:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:00 PM ----------
Jamielawther said:
Is the QSD8250 not the X10i? Because the Desire has one too? :s
I thought all 2011 Xperias' had the MSM8255?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya, I think someone make mistake...lol
Visit www.phonearena.com . You'll find everything you want there. The only problem is its speakers. Speakers are incapable. And every other thing is just great. Personal idea.
I think so haha!
Thanks to all of you..Now I am very much confused because of the two phones I have personally visited the local store and have seen the mini. Its very much small in size than wildfire and blade is almost the same looking device but having a poor CPU strength.
I dont like to play more games on cell. I love to play videos from youtube and online movies. So 600 Mhz and 200 adreno GPU would be capable to satisfy the needs?
Shiv Prajapati said:
Thanks to all of you..Now I am very much confused because of the two phones I have personally visited the local store and have seen the mini. Its very much small in size than wildfire and blade is almost the same looking device but having a poor CPU strength.
I dont like to play more games on cell. I love to play videos from youtube and online movies. So 600 Mhz and 200 adreno GPU would be capable to satisfy the needs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it would only can watch 480p video and no Adobe flash player support
Shiv Prajapati said:
Thanks to all of you..Now I am very much confused because of the two phones I have personally visited the local store and have seen the mini. Its very much small in size than wildfire and blade is almost the same looking device but having a poor CPU strength.
I dont like to play more games on cell. I love to play videos from youtube and online movies. So 600 Mhz and 200 adreno GPU would be capable to satisfy the needs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU isn't just for playing games, phone breathes by CPU. Anyway, CPU is the most important thing in a phone; the choice is yours my friend.
Related
New mini and mini pro!!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShtWcsof3Rk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AS6XOoTobVw
I hope you guys make a custom rom for this one also
Specs Xperia mini/mini pro
Androidversion Android 2.3.3
Screen 3,0 inch
Screenresolution 320 x 480 (HVGA) 16,777,216 color TFT
Touchscreen Capacitive
Keyboard Virtueel (Mini pro qwerty)
Processor 1 GHz
ROM memory 320 MB
RAM memory 512 MB
Memoryslot microSD
Wi-fi 802.11b/g/n
USB microUSB v2.0
Bluetooth Yes, 2.1 met FTP/OPP en A2DP
Hoofdtelefoon 3.5 mm audio jack
GPS Yes
Kompas ?
Accelerometer Yes
Gyroscoop No
NFC-chip No
Camera 5 megapixel with auto focus (rear camera)
Video 720p HD video recording
Flash Yes, LED flash
Battery 1200 mAh
Size 88 x 52 x 16 mm (Mini pro 92 x 53 x 18 mm)
Weight 94 gram (Mini pro 136 gram)
Phone memory up to 400MB
SWADED said:
New mini and mini pro!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShtWcsof3Rk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AS6XOoTobVw
I hope you guys make a custom rom for this one also
Specs Xperia mini/mini pro
Androidversion Android 2.3.3
Screen 3,0 inch
Screenresolution 320 x 480 (HVGA) 16,777,216 color TFT
Touchscreen Capacitive
Keyboard Virtueel (Mini pro qwerty)
Processor 1 GHz
ROM memory 320 MB
RAM memory 512 MB
Memoryslot microSD
Wi-fi 802.11b/g/n
USB microUSB v2.0
Bluetooth Yes, 2.1 met FTP/OPP en A2DP
Hoofdtelefoon 3.5 mm audio jack
GPS Yes
Kompas ?
Accelerometer Yes
Gyroscoop No
NFC-chip No
Camera 5 megapixel with auto focus (rear camera)
Video 720p HD video recording
Flash Yes, LED flash
Battery 1200 mAh
Size 88 x 52 x 16 mm (Mini pro 92 x 53 x 18 mm)
Weight 94 gram (Mini pro 136 gram)
Phone memory up to 400MB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rly awesome... multitouch included ?
yep, they support multitouch
you can see google maps with dual touch in this video
youtube.com/watch?v=AS6XOoTobVw (at 6:50)
and here's another little video showing the two phones
youtube.com/watch?v=ShtWcsof3Rk
Recon we could get this ported??
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Wait for a dump of the roms. They are not out yet. I hope for gingerbread camera library to be compatible :-D
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
Just port the rom from the new mini to our minis and ill be happy
Same here.....
just saw it today:
the final version of the new xperia mini pro has a front facing camera
and a hard tempered 4 point multitouch glass screen
Wouldit be worrth buying the new mini pro, regardless of theprice?
In doubt but I guess not
- Front camera, I dont care about it, I never use videocall also not for skype. costs much battery probably anyway
- BAttery boost, curious how long it will last now.
- android 2.3, we have it already (thx devs )
- snapdragon processor. Doesnt matter, our mini pro is already blazingly fast!!
- Design, I like the new one! new keyboard layout, looking at the pictures. symbols moved to left, 4 arrow keys to the right seems nice. Aside from homescreen/backbutton etc, pretty much teh same
- Multitouch, we already have it! But I'm curious how it works on the new one. It's quite difficult to handle now in some apps i.e. google maps.
Maybe I'm missing some hot items here, but as far as I can see now, no need to switch! Although its an awesome phone I think!
dsgamer1224 said:
Maybe I'm missing some hot items here, but as far as I can see now, no need to switch! Although its an awesome phone I think!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about:
- Bigger and better screen
- Higher resolution
- Record video in HD
nah. regular users dont need an "improvement" like that. compared to the iphone 1 to 4. the just add additional features.. a liitle.
its gonna take an year more to reach the price what the old mini are selling for...
and not to forget... I would personally want the battery replacement. maybe that fits my mini
new pro looks sweet as
ya, i like the mini pro a lot as well, too bad it does not have exmor r mobile, i may consider getting it to replace my current mini once it's available
Battery Life and price
These will be the two factors to take into consideration. In just about every other aspect, the mini pro 2 looks like a winner.
Wonder how much power the new CPU will consume vs. the old one. Interestingly enough, from what I've read, the new CPU is an older design, ARM7, and higher frequency, as well as more powerful GPU. My guess is it'll be more power hungry.
I think a 1200 mAh battery is still a bit short on capacity for the current Mini Pro, wonder how the new one will do given that it will be more power hungry.
If I'm wrong about the CPU specs please enlighten me.
Mike
dsgamer1224 said:
- snapdragon processor. Doesnt matter, our mini pro is already blazingly fast!!
!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True but, no matter how fast the X10 Mini Pro can get, it will never run apps that require ARMv7, meaning no native Flash support for example. Though that's less of an issue for some people, I'd personally love to have full Flash support on my Mini, Flash videos only with Skyfire, having to switch between Skyfire, Opera Mobile and the Youtube app doesn't quite cut it.
panamamike said:
These will be the two factors to take into consideration. In just about every other aspect, the mini pro 2 looks like a winner.
Wonder how much power the new CPU will consume vs. the old one. Interestingly enough, from what I've read, the new CPU is an older design, ARM7, and higher frequency, as well as more powerful GPU. My guess is it'll be more power hungry.
I think a 1200 mAh battery is still a bit short on capacity for the current Mini Pro, wonder how the new one will do given that it will be more power hungry.
If I'm wrong about the CPU specs please enlighten me.
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's hope your wrong, I'm def. gonna get the new mini pro unless it drains like this one I really don`t care about the speed anyway..
Sent from my U20i using XDA App
With the new MP - it's basically the phone we all want now.
2.3 will be running properly with all features and functions working correctly and be vastly more stable. (eg Camera functions and ANT+)
We should have the unlocked bootloader should we wish to use it.
We'll get Flash.
I'll be getting one ASAP as it fulfils my requirements perfectly - something which the current MP doesn't quite, even with all the modules and hacks available.
It's announced on official Sony Ericsson site
Despite both having the same GPU, I have heard that the SGS3 version will be better some how? Higher clock speed?
Can anyone shed some light on this?
otester said:
Despite both having the same GPU, I have heard that the SGS3 version will be better some how? Higher clock speed?
Can anyone shed some light on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also have more cores i believe.
FISKER_Q said:
Also have more cores i believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to this they both have 4 cores.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exynos
otester said:
According to this they both have 4 cores.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exynos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, could've sworn there was a discussion about it having more cores when it was announced, my bad then.
As far as I know the GPU will have higher clock frequency. Also both S2 and S3 have the Quad-Core Mali-400MP.
Faryaab said:
As far as I know the GPU will have higher clock frequency. Also both S2 and S3 have the Quad-Core Mali-400MP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will largely be the decider on whether I get it or not.
(As I am designing a GPU intensive 3D game).
otester said:
This will largely be the decider on whether I get it or not.
(As I am designing a GPU intensive 3D game).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, S2 had the fastest Mobile GPU and now S3 has the fastest one. So if you really want the best GPU go for the S3 but S2 will also work really well.
Faryaab said:
Well, S2 had the fastest Mobile GPU and now S3 has the fastest one. So if you really want the best GPU go for the S3 but S2 will also work really well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I need some proof though, no one seems to really know for sure, just want to be sure before splashing £500
This seems to explain it:
the main thing is the smaller process node design, the increased memory bandwidth, cleverer memory bandwidth architecture
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung announced that they have switched to high-k materials and metal gates (HKMG) and further claimed it can provide superior performance with less power than conventional poly-Si/SiON used at 45nm. Samsung demonstrated that Exynos 4212 (32nm version) SoC can produce 35% to 50% more horsepower than the older Exynos 4210 (45nm version). So clearly Exynos 4412 quad core wins the “CPU Horsepower” battle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While they haven’t officially announced this yet, I believe the GPU is the same one they promised for the dual core 1.5 Ghz Exynos 4212 chip. They said that GPU had a 50% increase in performance over the current one in the Galaxy S2. This improvement is most likely possible because of the jump from 45nm for the dual core Exynos to the 32nm Exynos 4412 (they used the more efficient transistors to increase performance at the same or lower power consumption).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source
I had the Note which was dualcore Exynos 1.4ghz and same GPU, but 1280x800, it could handle just about all the games thrown at it, ie. RipTide, Asphalt 6. I only felt Mordern Combat 3 could have higher fps, although very smooth and playable.
eksasol said:
I had the Note which was dualcore Exynos 1.4ghz and same GPU, but 1280x800, it could handle just about all the games thrown at it, ie. RipTide, Asphalt 6. I only felt Mordern Combat 3 could have higher fps, although very smooth and playable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the game I'm working on, just tried it on my phone today (haven't tested in a few months) and I have noticed some lagging with the new faster animations.
otester said:
With the game I'm working on, just tried it on my phone today (haven't tested in a few months) and I have noticed some lagging with the new faster animations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is that if you are hardly able to run the game on a Mali-400MP then the game would lag like hell even on T2/T3.
Faryaab said:
The thing is that if you are hardly able to run the game on a Mali-400MP then the game would lag like hell even on T2/T3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
T2/T3?
Also I wouldn't say it hardly runs, minimum of 20FPS, lots of optimizations to be done though such as LOD (basically chops poly count down on far away models).
For lower devices...
Dynamic lighting turned off.
Light maps could be baked into the texture
Normal maps removed.
Specular maps removed.
At the moment it's probably the same or exceeds the quality of Shadowgun THD.
Check available benchmarks .)
You should have looked around more for available benchmarks.
This show clarly that the s3 is much faster than the s2:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
source and source
Hironimo said:
You should have looked around more for available benchmarks.
This show clarly that the s3 is much faster than the s2:
source and source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to know the technical reason, I've already looked at the benchmarks.
otester said:
I wanted to know the technical reason, I've already looked at the benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher clock, optimised drivers, maybe hardware optimisation
Mopral said:
Higher clock, optimised drivers, maybe hardware optimisation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People at the HTC sensation forum extracted Adreno 225 Drivers and used it on their Adreno 220 powered phones and they gained a huge performance boost!
as we know Adreno 225 is Adreno 220 with double the frequency (thanks to that new manufacturing process of the CPU also the GPU still using the same process...)
so can't someone extract the new drivers so everyone with Mali 400 GPU can use it?
Because S3's Quad-core GPU frequency is 400MHz. S2 only 275MHz.I am a Chinese grade 9 student andlooking forward to GS III.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
sorry for my bad English. the frequency isthereason that some tablets with realtek rk2918 board(mali400 mp2)'s 3d performance is higher than GS II.because mali400 on rk2918 is400MHz but GS2 only 275MHz.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
Just wonder whether clocking up the GPU might pose heating issues.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Hey Guys I wanna know your opinion
Do you think that the Xperia J is a good upgrade, currently I am using the X10.
Does anyone of you own the J and can compare a bit?
From the Hardware it has more ram (512mb), the battery is a bit better (1750mah), the Screen has beautiful 16M colors and the same dimensions as X10's.
Tests say that the battery life is awsome and the camera is bad :/
So now, what do you think?
Is it a good upgrade from the X10?
Best Greets
Sent from my X10i using xda app-developers app
AW: from Xperia X10 to Xperia J?
Buy a xperia P it costs only 249€ euro
Xperia J costs 209 € euro
So only 40 euro diffrent ..
Sorry for my English xD
Sent from my Xperia MT15i Neo using XDA Premium
AW: from Xperia X10 to Xperia J?
Thanks, I also thought about it but I do not like the design
No Xperia P for me.
Greets
Sent from my X10i using xda app-developers app
On March 18 there is an announcement in Russian which may be the release of some new phones or at least the announcement of them.
There is an XPERIA L with some parallels to the XPERIA P and along the same lines as the XPERIA X10i (but more powerful)
The XPERIA L is claimed to have a 1GHz Snapdragon dual-core processor, Adreno 305 GPU, 4.3-inch display with resolution of 854 x 480, 8GB of internal storage (expandable via microSD), an 8-megapixel rear camera with Exmor RS sensor and a 1700 mAh battery. Dimensions are said to be 128.7mm x 65mm x 9.7mm.
keenofhiphop said:
Hey Guys I wanna know your opinion
Do you think that the Xperia J is a good upgrade, currently I am using the X10.
Does anyone of you own the J and can compare a bit?
From the Hardware it has more ram (512mb), the battery is a bit better (1750mah), the Screen has beautiful 16M colors and the same dimensions as X10's.
Tests say that the battery life is awsome and the camera is bad :/
So now, what do you think?
Is it a good upgrade from the X10?
Best Greets
Sent from my X10i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what usages do you wanna buy a new phone? I mean gaming , music , camera, battery, blah blah , which one is more important?
Sent from my E15a using Tapatalk 2
AW: from Xperia X10 to Xperia J?
Thank you very much for your opinions
This Xperia L sounds very good, I will wait if there is an annoumcement
May be the perfect one, even if there are no infornation about RAM, what is personally important for me (i mean 1 ghz is enough, but ram should be at least 512mb, better 1gb ) so it gonna be better than Xperia J for sure.
I do not need a phone for gaming, it is just that my x10 is getting older and older and the battery doesnt least long enough. So i dont want a superphone
Best Greets
Sent from my X10i using xda app-developers app
Sony XPERIA L
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Android: 4.1.2
Size: 128.7 x 65 x 9.7 mm
Weight: 137g
Screen: 4.3" (854 x 480px)
Processor: 1GHz Dual-Core MSM8230
GPU: Not listed but MSM8230 indicates an Adreno 305
RAM: 1GB
Storage: ~5GB internal and MicroSD card.
Camera: 8MP with front VGA camera
Bluetooth: 4.0
NFC: Yes
MHL: Yes
WiFi 2.4/5GHz 150Mbit/s includes WiFi-Direct and Miracast
Battery: 1750mAh replaceable
So, that's one OP sorted then. :fingers-crossed:
Reviews do note some slight camera and application startup lag. But we are talking about what is today a low end Android phone and not a Sony flagship as the XPERIA X10i was in it's day.
But ignoring what reviewers say, the XPERIA L looks like a pretty tight(Good) little package. Sweet.
AW: from Xperia X10 to Xperia J?
thank you it looks awsome
my favourite!!!
it looks fine, I ll look at price and decide if its worth it as sony phones always have a premium price
I wouldnt say its lowend... its more middle class, xperia J is lowend. However it is promising
Greets
Sent from my X10i using xda app-developers app
AW: from Xperia X10 to Xperia J?
But the Xperia SP looks even better!!! that is my new phone undervolt to ine ghz and batterylife forever!
I love it. Boom
Best Greets
Sent from my X10i using xda app-developers app
keenofhiphop said:
I wouldnt say its lowend... its more middle class, xperia J is lowend. However it is promising
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but maybe this is the Sony 2013 entry level phone now. So maybe there is no 'low-end' Sony 2013 phone, maybe it's just good, better and best from now on. You go Sony :laugh:
Maybe 2012 was the swan song for the Sony single-core processor phone. The XPERIA J would have struggled with anything beyond a communications device[Me thinks]. Visual media may have been a bit challenging on the XPERIA J with an Adreno 200 even if it was the advanced version, as the XPERIA J does parallel the XPERIA X10i very closely.
Based on the specs of the MSM8230 in the XPERIA L there is potential for it to be over-clocked to 1.2GHz.
I'm still smitten with the XPERIA L as even with a 1750mAh battery, the small screen and processor may be able to collectively pull some good battery hours when rooted and SetCPU profiles are used to 'model' screen off and CPU governors and etc.
And to have NFC, WiFi-Direct/Miracast (2.4GHz/5GHz WiFi) and from indications, a good GPU in the form of the Adreno 305 as well as all the rest, the XPERIA L gives a good rounded package.
Mind you the XPERIA SP is tempting with it's "BLING" factor and higher specs.
I have the Xperia L now by the way
my mom has the xperia SP and it is not so much better in my eyes. it is bigger and fatter. and the screen and rocessor really seem to save some battery.
Greets
Gesendet von meinem Sony Xperia L
NEW Xperia ray 3
around September 12
4.35 inch HD screen WhiteMagic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 2.3GHz Snapdragon processor
Battery 2500Mah
2 GB Ram
32 GB memory, memory card support
Camera sensor size large, 20Mpx, equipped with Carl Zeiss optics, xenon can have Flash
Xperia Dogo / Xperia C670X / Xperia C680X „Honami“ / Xperia „Ray 3“
http://sonyviet.vn/
If that's the size of the screen they should name it something else and release something a tad smaller, or just update the HW and FW of the old Ray and re-release it.
Sent from Myushi
LeClair said:
NEW Xperia ray 3
around September 12
4.35 inch HD screen WhiteMagic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 2.3GHz Snapdragon processor
Battery 2500Mah
2 GB Ram
32 GB memory, memory card support
Camera sensor size large, 20Mpx, equipped with Carl Zeiss optics, xenon can have Flash
Xperia Dogo / Xperia C670X / Xperia C680X „Honami“ / Xperia „Ray 3“
http://sonyviet.vn/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Vietnamese???
Yes.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
i have no idea what they are all doing.
Im looking for phone with 4gb memory plus card support , about 3.8 screen , camera max to 8mpix and 1gb ram. It will be best phone in cheap price.
But they need to pack all the stuff into that all.
2gb ram?? no android, even miui wont use it.
phone ok but with price they will want for it will be to big and not much persons will buy it.
if it all is true
now Im stoping spaming
Who wouldn't want this? I was disappointed it didn't show up sooner. It looks plastic and not as high end as the z1. I hope that at least translates to removable battery. Theres something cool about a small phone with that much power. "Phenomenal Cosmic Power, itty-bitty living space."
would be great but,why ray 3 while there is no ray 2?
there is no such thing.and the pics are fake.but im proud of Xperia Ray cuz it so good that we allways hear this fake news.i wish there would be really another ray.but this phone will remain a legend.
The Honami Mini has similar specs ....
http://www.unwiredview.com/2013/09/...honami-mini-to-arrive-in-the-next-few-months/
Yea nice pics really stange thing xperia ray 3 have 2gb ram and amazing cpu but running stock android 2.3 yea amazing...
sogukk said:
would be great but,why ray 3 while there is no ray 2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, why?
AbaiiFunk said:
yes, why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ray 2 is Xperia SX
Ainster said:
Yea nice pics really stange thing xperia ray 3 have 2gb ram and amazing cpu but running stock android 2.3 yea amazing...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, you always can install custom rom.
marokas said:
Well, you always can install custom rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thing about what are you say so big specifications and sony will create old 2.3 android for this phone ?
Hi! Suspecting a graphics problem.
So... I just bought this phone. I charged it and updated to 6.0, then installed my apps.
It seemd a bit sluggish when handling graphics, which made me test it with 3dmark. I ran SlingShot ES3.1 and got quite poor results in the graphics section. Physics were fine (CPU related, I guess). Screenshot below. The graphics score was 323 (in one review, which I cant link) and the reference score in app is 283. Mine is 71. I had nothing running background and the phone was recently restarted. What could be the reason?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Edit. Power plan is also set to "performance".
As you may know, this SOC does perform well in multitasking but not so in single task and graphics. It's common to all Kirin SOC.
That said, I got 69 score and 1320 Physics, so pretty standard.
It's not a gamer GPU.
zinko_pt said:
As you may know, this SOC does perform well in multitasking but not so in single task and graphics. It's common to all Kirin SOC.
That said, I got 69 score and 1320 Physics, so pretty standard.
It's not a gamer GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, good at single and multi core but not on graphics
memht said:
Actually, good at single and multi core but not on graphics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparatively to Qualcomm apples-to-apples you're wrong, due to it's higher frequency. Check P9 (Kirin 955) and Honor8 reviews when compared with SD820 and SD652.
zinko_pt said:
As you may know, this SOC does perform well in multitasking but not so in single task and graphics. It's common to all Kirin SOC.
That said, I got 69 score and 1320 Physics, so pretty standard.
It's not a gamer GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then how is it possible that the same device has got very different scores when tested in reviews?
futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/Huawei+Honor+7/review
qtba said:
Then how is it possible that the same device has got very different scores when tested in reviews?
futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/Huawei+Honor+7/review
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Different test settings. Apps installed, accounts, phone settings...
Sent from my PLK-L01 using Tapatalk
But the results surely should not be that bad? I mean, the graphics score I got was less than fourth of what I saw in different reviews. Only difference was, that the tests in reviews were ran with android 5.x still on board and I ran the test with 6.0 just installed. The futuremark test is standard.
My phone was mint condition. No programs on background. Nothing but the standard applicatins installed. Did not make a difference. I ran the test several times just to make sure (with reboots etc.). Socres were 66-71 (graphic score around 53-55).
qtba said:
But the results surely should not be that bad? I mean, the graphics score I got was less than fourth of what I saw in different reviews. Only difference was, that the tests in reviews were ran with android 5.x still on board and I ran the test with 6.0 just installed. The futuremark test is standard.
My phone was mint condition. No programs on background. Nothing but the standard applicatins installed. Did not make a difference. I ran the test several times just to make sure (with reboots etc.). Socres were 66-71 (graphic score around 53-55).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could even be different app versions. Unless you provide the reviews we'll be around endless speculation.
Having different kernel (5.1 vs 6.0.1) also makes a difference.
qtba said:
Hi! Suspecting a graphics problem.
So... I just bought this phone. I charged it and updated to 6.0, then installed my apps.
It seemd a bit sluggish when handling graphics, which made me test it with 3dmark. I ran SlingShot ES3.1 and got quite poor results in the graphics section. Physics were fine (CPU related, I guess). Screenshot below. The graphics score was 323 (in one review, which I cant link) and the reference score in app is 283. Mine is 71. I had nothing running background and the phone was recently restarted. What could be the reason?
Edit. Power plan is also set to "performance".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kirin processors aren't powerful enough for heavy games or single core demanding tasks
PalakMi said:
Kirin processors aren't powerful enough for heavy games or single core demanding tasks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, it´s widely documented throughout the web. Even Mali GPU in latest Exynos are more powerful.
zinko_pt said:
True, it´s widely documented throughout the web. Even Mali GPU in latest Exynos are more powerful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly