Hi. This thread is for kernel CM9 source code request. Other devs can mod it and decrease battery drain because CM9's battery drain is very high. Kernel SC doesn't update since 2 months.
Other possible request is that kernel CM9 will support undervolt.
Please if you would like the requests posted here, post in this thread and we will try to get it.
This is pointless, their source is readily available from their github
Sent from my MT11i using XDA
Don't update since 2 months ago. Enter to the kernel folder and see it.
The code is updated, the changelog isn't.
Not every part will show newer....
Many parts will show as months old, however if you sync the source you will get the latest code.
Sent from my MT11i using XDA
https://github.com/freexperia/semc-kernel-msm7x30-ics/tree/ics-beta/kernel
Only cpu.c has changed 6 days ago. And the age change auto if they update it.
EDIT: If I download SC, it will be updated?
If you sync the source tree yes
Sent from my MT11i using XDA
Ok. Sorry. I only saw github and I don't download SC. And...yes, SC are updated if I download it. So that...the only request now is undervolt for CM9 .
Thanks!
Related
anyone who has tried v20g....is there any new changes...when compared to gb rom's from noejn/andy/mik??
Read all the Threads about V20G, you may find the Answer there.
Use search before asking such Questions.
Thanks
i wanted to get replies from ppl who have tried it..!!
posting such questions in developer forum isn't needed and searching hundreds of pages is tough...
you can enlighten me with the direct link..or teaching me efficient ways of searching..
All in all, no the V20x(A,G) arent better then Miks,Andys or Noejn Rom and Franko'S Kernel.
But sometime this Night/Morning (Europe) LG released the 2.3.3 Source and we can hope on better Kernels..and maybe more bugless Roms from the Devs.
It looks like Andy already started, and im sure Mik and the others will follow soon in the next Days.
Andy statet that they have to do a complete restart (rewrite?) with the Kernel.
kaliberx said:
All in all, no the V20x(A,G) arent better then Miks,Andys or Noejn Rom and Franko'S Kernel.
But sometime this Night/Morning (Europe) LG released the 2.3.3 Source and we can hope on better Kernels..and maybe more bugless Roms from the Devs.
It looks like Andy already started, and im sure Mik and the others will follow soon in the next Days.
Andy statet that they have to do a complete restart (rewrite?) with the Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, there's at least 2 things that will be better in the V20x kernels: UMS & (my pet peeve in both current GB roms) Bluetooth calling!
Lack of bluetooth calling has made me come back to Froyo (void.) every time. But I guess Andy and Mik_os won't be far behind now that the sources have been released.
does the kernel from the official sources fixed our multitouch axis inversion and touchbug?
if it is i will keep my phone happily
No checked the axis inversion..new.kernel doesn't fix it
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Try V20B (Russia) if you want to
sajjan said:
No checked the axis inversion..new.kernel doesn't fix it
Arggghhh
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Hi,
[Off-topic] I'm newbie into Android stuff and XDA (installed my first custom ROM a week ago), but I have been intensely following General and Development sessions recently.
Following the {X10}[DEVELOPMENT] - CM7.1.0 - FXP028 IN PROGRESS - FreeXperia Project topic, I see ppl still reporting issues and bugs. Seems to me there are still several adjustments to be done until a actually ready ROM comes out (Am I wrong, or been unfair with dev team?)
On the other hand, official CM7 (which I guess requires excellency on quality/performance/stability/functionality) was already announced.
So my doubt is: what to expect with this? Shall we expect a fully functional and stable Official CM ROM? If affirmative, how this affect release date?
Being less specific: How this whole development proccess starts from now?
Sorry for bad english.
i'm also interested on this. looking forward for a real cm7 rom
fsmaia said:
Hi,
[Off-topic] I'm newbie into Android stuff and XDA (installed my first custom ROM a week ago), but I have been intensely following General and Development sessions recently.
Following the {X10}[DEVELOPMENT] - CM7.1.0 - FXP028 IN PROGRESS - FreeXperia Project topic, I see ppl still reporting issues and bugs. Seems to me there are still several adjustments to be done until a actually ready ROM comes out (Am I wrong, or been unfair with dev team?)
On the other hand, official CM7 (which I guess requires excellency on quality/performance/stability/functionality) was already announced.
So my doubt is: what to expect with this? Shall we expect a fully functional and stable Official CM ROM? If affirmative, how this affect release date?
Being less specific: How this whole development proccess starts from now?
Sorry for bad english.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bear in mind that the goal of the FXP project is to write sources for the X10 so that we can have our own CM roms.
Also, number one rule of CM: Do not ask for ETAs.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
I read this ETA rule several times, my bad..
But my main concern is about
stability and functionality..
Sent from my X10 using XDA App
fsmaia said:
I read this ETA rule several times, my bad..
But my main concern is about
stability and functionality..
Sent from my X10 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use stock then it is functional and stable. ................................... o right it is not stable and functionality is questionable...
FXP109
where can i find FXP109 from??
popain said:
where can i find FXP109 from??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why do you need old fxp roms?
you can find both cm7 and cm9 roms latest in development section in their respective threads
fsmaia said:
I read this ETA rule several times, my bad..
But my main concern is about
stability and functionality..
Sent from my X10 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look for other ROMs which are more stable... if you find FXP is unstable and not your cup of tea then download Xperia X10s ROM or feralab ROM or something else which is stable... BTW you talking about CM7.2 or CM9..?
CM ROMs take time to become stable because drivers and other things have to be written from scratch as those are sony's properties (IP) and Sony don't provide them to developers.... read up on things before you shoot questions
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda app-developers app
On the new ics roms
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA
In order to get oc/uc one would have to build / edit the kernel source code. But since we have a leak and not an official release that source code is not available. I would give us no chance of seeing a oc kernel before ics is actually released. Even then we might not get the entire source.
Over 10000!!! You bet I am.
I saw a small video regarding one of the developers talking about Linaro....will it be used on the S3. Merged in to CM9 builds perhaps when they arrive on the S3...?
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...e-and-now-parts-of-it-are-being-added-to-cm9/
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
i was wondering almost the same thing: will it allow the devs to develop smaller code? as speed is not an issue...
Looks interesting
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
I want to try to compile it with Linaro but there's some porting to the code to be done, right now it's not working on the newer toolchains.
I thought it was more than just the kernel, like the aosp libs source were modified to be able to be built with Linaro. Then those changes get merged into CM, which can then be built with Linaro, and hopefully we all get to use it
AndreiLux said:
I want to try to compile it with Linaro but there's some porting to the code to be done, right now it's not working on the newer toolchains.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best of luck Andrei. Really hope you get It to work.
If you do get it working, you will have an immensely popular and cutting edge kernel.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Introducing codefireXperiment for your device! This OP is going to stay slim and bloat free, just like codefireXperiment. No marketing buzzwords either. We take such confidence in the speed and performance of this distribution, we challenge you to find a faster and more stable one!
Warning: we only support anykernel methods of custom kernel installation.
Here's a bit of info you may want on this project for how we do things differently:
CLICK HERE to find out more about the new team working on this project since our TeamEOS merger.
No features you don't need which slow the device down, or put your data at risk of being stolen. If you want to give it away, it should be your decision.
A fast and clean install with no UX decisions made for you. You make the ROM whatever you would like.
A team constantly exploring totally new feature sets and optimizations geared toward you, the user
We utilize a plethora of optimizations in a build system unlike any other:
Each build has a toolchain built for your device at the time of build. No more generic toolchain android builds.
Consistently updated upstream toolchain module source with our custom backports, fixes, and optimizations applied in a patch at build time.
Fully built utilizing Link Time Optimization (another custom ROM first). Feel free to google this one a bit to get an idea of the performance gain.
Many repositories have code fixes, cleanups, and many minor optimizations which are too generous to even speak of here.
Optimizations are toggled on and off based on device for the best experience we can acheive for your device without sacrificing any stability
Many Qcom optimizations and AOSP master (upstream) optimizations and fixes using device specifications to determine usage.
Fully built utilizing strict aliasing and isognu++11 mode.
Full "-O3" build. To those who don't know, this is the highest "optimization level" available in gcc that sets many other flags.
Important Links:
Download Nightlies - We have a very in depth review system, so these should be considered stable.
Download Weeklies - These are built once a week on Monday.
Download GApps
Download SuperSU Zip
Kernel Source
Interactive and Rolling Changelog
Bug Tracker
Instructions:
**This uses the 3.4 cm kernel tweaked for gcc-4.8 builds and as such,
follows all the same requirements as CM-10.2. NEWEST FIRMWARE/HBOOT are required. **
In the same recovery session, flash the following:
Flash rom
Flash GApps
Flash SuperSU zip
Reboot
Thank you for choosing codefireXperiment - See more at: http://www.codefirex.com/index.php?...htc-one-xl-codefirexperiment-nightlies#latest
CHAT on IRC Freenode #codefirex
PHABRICATOR - review system
GITHUB
Thanks to the CM team for all thier work on this family of devices, especiallly h8rift for his work on evita for all of us to enjoy.
Also thanks to my beta testers for experimenting with me.
DISCLAIMER: I will not be held responsible for any damages caused to your device by flashing this ROM. Your warranty is now void.
By proceeding you accept the risks involved with flashing ROMS. While I test everything on my own device, I cannot garauntee yours will not explode into kittens and rainbows.
KNOWN ISSUES:
ROOT ACCESS : On-going disscusion within the team but as of right now root is not available to userspace. Root currently works over adb only. Flash the superSU.zip and carry on if you need root access for apps like TiBu or root file explorers. Otherwise you really don't need it
BOOT ANIMATION : i'ts just full of struggle, it's an old animation made for smaller screens. It freezes and goes blank screen on first boot. Don't be alarmed, it'll be OK. New custom boot ani is being designed now by a fellow team member
BROWSER : Ocassional FC on embedded browser streaming video. You tube and links that open a video player are fine, just embedded video.
ROM is still under construction so i'm sure more will surface but this should be more than ready to be a daily driver.
mine too
Sounds sweet man. Another aosp ROM to check out.
Thanks for sharing man
SENT FROM MY LTEVO
So this is a faster version of stock AOSP right? Sounds good, I'll check it out.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
numel007 said:
So this is a faster version of stock AOSP right? Sounds good, I'll check it out.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something like that...I've been building rootbox for a while now and if you've ever tried that ROM u know it has everything and the kitchen sink. This is totally opposite of that. Minimal, fast, and clean.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk 2
jrior001 said:
Something like that...I've been building rootbox for a while now and if you've ever tried that ROM u know it has everything and the kitchen sink. This is totally opposite of that. Minimal, fast, and clean.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what aosp is all about. Thanks for putting our device on the official nightlies
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Love this ROM it has great performance and battery life and also has the settings key that works on the phone! Great work pm me if you need a guinea pig for anything you're working on
Sent from my Evo 4g LTE using xda app-developers app
New nightly is up in OP.
Changlog:
Bluetooth- fixes for 48hz audio & issues with some car connections
Fixes for some issues with games crashing in 4.3
Updated camera proprietaries/kernel code from sense 5 Evita leak.
synergy is on vacay for a week so it will be a few days before we get added to the nightly builds. In the mean time I'll try to kick a few out to hold us over.
Please report back on camera, need verification its working well.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk 2
I didn't think we would ever see CodeFireX back on our device. Thanks man!
jrior001 said:
KNOWN ISSUES:
BOOT ANIMATION : i'ts just full of struggle, it's an old animation made for smaller screens. It freezes and goes blank screen on first boot. Don't be alarmed, it'll be OK. New custom boot ani is being designed now by a fellow team member
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go, check this out and see what you think as a temp or whatever.
AromaCodeFireX
Kilokk said:
Here you go, check this out and see what you think as a temp or whatever.
AromaCodeFireX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They've got a set of stock aosp bootani's that were supposed to get added in last week as temp but I'll defiantly check it out. Are you sure it writes to the correct location. I'm not positive cfx uses the same structure as others for that.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk 2
jrior001 said:
They've got a set of stock aosp bootani's that were supposed to get added in last week as temp but I'll defiantly check it out. Are you sure it writes to the correct location. I'm not positive cfx uses the same structure as others for that.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should... I had this made last year when Synerge was working on the previous CodeFireX project and there are multiple base options in the Aroma installer. I will check it out this evening when I check out your ROM and let you know.
Kilokk said:
It should... I had this made last year when Synerge was working on the previous CodeFireX project and there are multiple base options in the Aroma installer. I will check it out this evening when I check out your ROM and let you know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did just grab the ani from the installer and replace built in @ /system/media/ and wow! Very nice!!
Edit: ran installer, chose non-cm option and installer failed.
Edit2: ran it again, cm option and installer shows errors still but new bootani works on reboot.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk 2
jrior001 said:
I did just grab the ani from the installer and replace built in @ /system/media/ and wow! Very nice!!
Edit: ran installer, chose non-cm option and installer failed.
Edit2: ran it again, cm option and installer shows errors still but new bootani works on reboot.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do remember we had to work out some kinks. I'll check my dates on the builds and see if I uploaded the correct version for the Aroma installer.
Sorry, but what features in this Rom?
Sent from my EVO 4G LTE using xda app-developers app
mcwups1 said:
Sorry, but what features in this Rom?
Sent from my EVO 4G LTE using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Features? Its more of concept than anything. Most ROM came from CMs base or AOKP's base and modify/customize into something else. This ROM is based/kept current directly off of googles AOSP master branch. There are some things pulled from CM/aokp for hardware compatibility and what not but the soul of the ROM is strict AOSP. After that its tweaked and optimized to make it as smooth, fast, and efficient as possible.
Simply put this is closest thing to pure AOSP brought to other devices besides the Nexus line.
You won't find all the built in mods and custom colors and what not. This is clean simple fast AOSP. As vanilla as possible.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk 2
Hardware keys are set up exactly the way I like them right from the jump. And this is actually the most stable 4.3 ROM that has been on my phone. All the others just kept crashing.
Sent using my thumbs.
This ROM is a lean mean STABLE machine. Good to see you got this up bro. Ran that beta for a couple days and couldn't break it, great work by you and team.
Sent from my EVO
jamieg71 said:
This ROM is a lean mean STABLE machine. Good to see you got this up bro. Ran that beta for a couple days and couldn't break it, great work by you and team.
Sent from my EVO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man, from a respected dev that means a lot to me. In the short time I've been doing this this was by far my biggest challenge yet.
Sent from my SCH-i705 using Tapatalk 2