Can Linaro double the performance off the cpu on the S3 - Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I saw a small video regarding one of the developers talking about Linaro....will it be used on the S3. Merged in to CM9 builds perhaps when they arrive on the S3...?
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...e-and-now-parts-of-it-are-being-added-to-cm9/
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

i was wondering almost the same thing: will it allow the devs to develop smaller code? as speed is not an issue...

Looks interesting
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

I want to try to compile it with Linaro but there's some porting to the code to be done, right now it's not working on the newer toolchains.

I thought it was more than just the kernel, like the aosp libs source were modified to be able to be built with Linaro. Then those changes get merged into CM, which can then be built with Linaro, and hopefully we all get to use it

AndreiLux said:
I want to try to compile it with Linaro but there's some porting to the code to be done, right now it's not working on the newer toolchains.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best of luck Andrei. Really hope you get It to work.
If you do get it working, you will have an immensely popular and cutting edge kernel.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

Related

Is anybody working on a Linaro kernel for the Touchpad?

I've been running a linaro kernel for my Galaxy Nexus for a little while now and the difference is definitely noticeable. I was curious if there are any plans to bake in the linaro optimizations to any of the Touchpad kernels out there.
oRAirwolf said:
I've been running a linaro kernel for my Galaxy Nexus for a little while now and the difference is definitely noticeable. I was curious if there are any plans to bake in the linaro optimizations to any of the Touchpad kernels out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At this point it would be better for someone to be porting JB rather than working on ICS still.
Linaro is an overrated pos...
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2

EVO 3D kernel source release

Just curious how much this will actually effect ROM development? I know we have a few custom kernels which make some things better and some worse. So having source I assume will make a more solid kernel. Is it different between ICS and JB?
herousr said:
Just curious how much this will actually effect ROM development? I know we have a few custom kernels which make some things better and some worse. So having source I assume will make a more solid kernel. Is it different between ICS and JB?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
New kernels, cm9 and cm10 will be loads less buggy, the list goes on for a while
Sent from my PG86100 using xda app-developers app
Is there any way you can be a bit more specific or tell me more about it?
hello, i ve used kernel coolZ, i m pleased about it!
herousr said:
Is there any way you can be a bit more specific or tell me more about it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without source, a kernel creator can use their skills to cobble together a kernel, but it's next to impossible. The current crop of CDMA kernels were created by taking the GSM source code and adjusting it. Some were more successful than others. Now that the CDMA source had dropped, kernel makers can use it as a foundation to add features.
Read, Search, Read again, ... Then Ask with Tapatalk 2

[q] [linaro][cm9]

are there any linaro optimized cm9 roms for s3?
Linaro is for kernels... Its a tool chain used to compile kernels. Nothing to do with a ROM. Why are you still on CM9? Developments done...
b-eock said:
Linaro is for kernels... Its a tool chain used to compile kernels. Nothing to do with a ROM. Why are you still on CM9? Developments done...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i need ics, and i heard that linaro output perfomance is greater..
i just dont know much about these toolchains..
Omg... You have the chance of SDS on CM9. linaro hardly made any difference performance wise. So just update to CM10.1 There isn't much of a noticeable difference if any at all.
dont freak out, ALRIGHT
he's trying to help you
You're on ICS, SDS very likely to happen.
What do you need ICS for?
Sent from I9300 - Paranoid Android
for chainfire3d
Your call.
At least use the emmc brick bug app to find out if you're affected. At least make an educated decision
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

[Kernel][aosp]4.2 .2

this kernel is based off crpalmers aosp kernel i have modded a few clocks and change fsb and gpu clocks for folks who want more from there device in time as i learn more about performance i will modify and update kernel with changes and keep updated
Code:
to do list
sweep2wake
any request
Code:
[b][i][size="7"]Downloads[/size][/i][/b]
http://goo.im/devs/T1gArtist/Kernels/FreeBird-AOSP-1.0.zip
build alpha 1.0 good for cm10.1 builds after July 7 2013
My Awesome Kernel
Source: http://www.htcdev.com/DevCenter/downloads
https;://github.com/tigartist/AOSP_HTC_DNA.git
Compiler: Linaro GCC 4.6
Branch: Android 4.2.2
Kernel Version: 3.4.10
defconfig: dlx_defconfig
Code:
[size="4"] Thankyou List
Chad0989 fir the base kernel \i know both chad and crpalmer have worked hard on the kernel together
Crpalmer for the base Kernel /
Zarboz for Sweep2Wake [/size]
mine
bug reports
t1gartist said:
this kernel is based off crpalmers aosp kernel i have modded a few clocks and change fsb and gpu clocks for folks who want more from there device in time as i learn more about performance i will modify and update kernel with changes and keep updated with palmers linux updates also
Code:
[b][i][size="7"]Downloads[/size][/i][/b]
http://goo.im/devs/T1gArtist/Kernels/FreeBird-AOSP-1.0.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for Android 4.1.x or 4.2.x?
rohitece06 said:
for Android 4.1.x or 4.2.x?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It says AOSP, and I dont think we have any 4.1 AOSP ROMs, just 4.2.2 CM based ROMs.
Sent from my Droid DNA running Rootbox
t1gartist said:
mine
bug reports
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great to see another contribution
Sent from my SCH-R970 using xda premium
Not a big one Lol I just figured some folks who can't compile and such wanted a higher clock device. But I am learning so why not share
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app
t1gartist said:
Not a big one Lol I just figured some folks who can't compile and such wanted a higher clock device. But I am learning so why not share
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any idea, on what ROM will it work?
I'm going to add a few things like voltage control and two govs and then work on performance and speed like I said based on what your CPU is binned is how your device will clock
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app
cm10.1
When a Miui build is posted i will add a seperate download for it
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app
t1gartist said:
cm10.1
When a Miui build is posted i will add a seperate download for it
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am probably getting excited for nothing but if I do use this kernel with CM10.1 will it take care of all the bugs like audio, BT, and camera
no all of those things are still a work in progress and i cant work bt anyways i dont have a headset but i am going to try i fix audio not sure how fast i can work as im still learning the ins and outs of coding
I haven't had a chance to search or ask Crpalmer about this...but could you add in the 192mhz clock speed? Since one of his updates to the CM kernel, its only ever had 384mhz as the lowest select-able. As far as I know his sense kernel still has 192mhz in it. Just a thought!
I clocks added all the way down to 100 MHz but for some reason I can only get it to show 384 _ 1512 mhz
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app
bb12489 said:
I haven't had a chance to search or ask Crpalmer about this...but could you add in the 192mhz clock speed? Since one of his updates to the CM kernel, its only ever had 384mhz as the lowest select-able. As far as I know his sense kernel still has 192mhz in it. Just a thought!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the reason crpalmer/chad removed it was because now at 384mhz it uses the same amount of power as the 192mhz clock did, so now it does more for less power basically
Is this gonna be dependent on cm builds? If so, you might wanna designate dates like in Palmers thread
.torrented said:
the reason crpalmer/chad removed it was because now at 384mhz it uses the same amount of power as the 192mhz clock did, so now it does more for less power basically
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use the way faux123 does with hfpll values
Refer to his htc one source
Sent from my SCH-R970 using xda premium
Odd..I flashed this and it made illusion laggy. The settings say 3.4.10 and the clocks low and high are 384/1512. Maybe this is just alpha and you're working on something, but I still thought I'd report.
i am so excited for s2w aosp i am freaking out!
Did I miss the source information/link?
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA - Carbon
Will post now thank you
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium HD app

Custom Cortex-A optimized Linaro GCC Toolchains

Found this while searching the forums, not sure if it'll help any devs but here it is.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2106644
Sent from my Evo V 4G using xda app-developers app
So... what's good at that app or whatever it is ?
regal.life said:
So... what's good at that app or whatever it is ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a toolchain for generating (compiling/linking) the android sources to get software for a device.
The efficiency in terms of size and speed of an executable software highly depends (besides of well written sources) on the toolchains
compiler/linker.
The same sources compiled with 2 different toolchains can result in different behaviour of executable software.

Categories

Resources