are there any linaro optimized cm9 roms for s3?
Linaro is for kernels... Its a tool chain used to compile kernels. Nothing to do with a ROM. Why are you still on CM9? Developments done...
b-eock said:
Linaro is for kernels... Its a tool chain used to compile kernels. Nothing to do with a ROM. Why are you still on CM9? Developments done...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i need ics, and i heard that linaro output perfomance is greater..
i just dont know much about these toolchains..
Omg... You have the chance of SDS on CM9. linaro hardly made any difference performance wise. So just update to CM10.1 There isn't much of a noticeable difference if any at all.
dont freak out, ALRIGHT
he's trying to help you
You're on ICS, SDS very likely to happen.
What do you need ICS for?
Sent from I9300 - Paranoid Android
for chainfire3d
Your call.
At least use the emmc brick bug app to find out if you're affected. At least make an educated decision
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Related
I saw a small video regarding one of the developers talking about Linaro....will it be used on the S3. Merged in to CM9 builds perhaps when they arrive on the S3...?
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...e-and-now-parts-of-it-are-being-added-to-cm9/
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
i was wondering almost the same thing: will it allow the devs to develop smaller code? as speed is not an issue...
Looks interesting
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
I want to try to compile it with Linaro but there's some porting to the code to be done, right now it's not working on the newer toolchains.
I thought it was more than just the kernel, like the aosp libs source were modified to be able to be built with Linaro. Then those changes get merged into CM, which can then be built with Linaro, and hopefully we all get to use it
AndreiLux said:
I want to try to compile it with Linaro but there's some porting to the code to be done, right now it's not working on the newer toolchains.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best of luck Andrei. Really hope you get It to work.
If you do get it working, you will have an immensely popular and cutting edge kernel.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
I've been running a linaro kernel for my Galaxy Nexus for a little while now and the difference is definitely noticeable. I was curious if there are any plans to bake in the linaro optimizations to any of the Touchpad kernels out there.
oRAirwolf said:
I've been running a linaro kernel for my Galaxy Nexus for a little while now and the difference is definitely noticeable. I was curious if there are any plans to bake in the linaro optimizations to any of the Touchpad kernels out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At this point it would be better for someone to be porting JB rather than working on ICS still.
Linaro is an overrated pos...
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
hello there
my qustion is, if it will be an option to overclock our phones on any ics rom ?
because on gingerbread, with the right kernel, it was possible, so I thought and asked myself why it is not possible to overclock it now on new ics roms....
I dont know much about what you must do and mod to enable overclocking in kernels...so dont be afraid or angry when seeing this..
is this because htc is not offering the source code of the new kernel? (btw is this legal? thought that the linux kernel is on gnu licence...)
anyway, was there ever a source code of the gingerbread kernels ? is this the main problem when devs trying to mod something advanced like overclocking possibility?
I've liked my phone on gingerbread overclocked, it was really fast (not the launcher, now it's rendered on gpu as everybody knows..)
and battery also was no problem.......
it would be nice if someone could write a good statement and a good info of what must be done to enable it, because I want to learn also something new..
Ubuntu_Man said:
hello there
my qustion is, if it will be an option to overclock our phones on any ics rom ?
because on gingerbread, with the right kernel, it was possible, so I thought and asked myself why it is not possible to overclock it now on new ics roms....
I dont know much about what you must do and mod to enable overclocking in kernels...so dont be afraid or angry when seeing this..
is this because htc is not offering the source code of the new kernel? (btw is this legal? thought that the linux kernel is on gnu licence...)
anyway, was there ever a source code of the gingerbread kernels ? is this the main problem when devs trying to mod something advanced like overclocking possibility?
I've liked my phone on gingerbread overclocked, it was really fast (not the launcher, now it's rendered on gpu as everybody knows..)
and battery also was no problem.......
it would be nice if someone could write a good statement and a good info of what must be done to enable it, because I want to learn also something new..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It probably will be able to be over clocked. Im not an evo user myself but the same thing almost apllies for all phones. I cant give you a big explanation because im noob still but i can tell you something. Overclocking is going to be different in ics because ics has more features meaning more speed. So kernal makers will have to try to make it more ram efficent. Or stop un needed things when ever your not using them. Then it will stay fast without ics kicking in with its slowness at times. Right now thats all i can say. Its 01:00 here and i cant think so i might edit this some other time.
Sent from the phone of Gamers
Overclocking was made possible on gingerbread roms when HTC released kernel sources and thus the developers was able to edit the kernel sources to allow for higher CPU speeds, then build the kernel and release it to us.
The same thing will happen when they release kernel sources for ICS (Or it might even be Jelly Bean by that time, who knows).
Moonbloom said:
Overclocking was made possible on gingerbread roms when HTC released kernel sources and thus the developers was able to edit the kernel sources to allow for higher CPU speeds, then build the kernel and release it to us.
The same thing will happen when they release kernel sources for ICS (Or it might even be Jelly Bean by that time, who knows).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there are several kernels for gsm and a few for cdma that allow for this
The kernel source code for the GSM EVO 3D and CDMA i believe was released around a month ago so overclock is there! on the kernel i use not throwing any names i can overclock to 1.8 GHZ !
Austin3161337 said:
The kernel source code for the GSM EVO 3D and CDMA i believe was released around a month ago so overclock is there! on the kernel i use not throwing any names i can overclock to 1.8 GHZ !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it is a ics kernel? I think you're not right, if there showed up a way to overclock on ics, it would stand on the xda homepage and also in some threads but there is not such headline or thread....
Btw, sorry for my english, I'm from germany/poland and have not good grades in english at my school (btw I must do something against it, have just one year before going to university... )
Sent from my HTC ShooterU using xda app-developers app
Ubuntu_Man said:
So it is a ics kernel? I think you're not right, if there showed up a way to overclock on ics, it would stand on the xda homepage and also in some threads but there is not such headline or thread....
Btw, sorry for my english, I'm from germany/poland and have not good grades in english at my school (btw I must do something against it, have just one year before going to university... )
Sent from my HTC ShooterU using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea, so totally not true. check your pm's!!!
We can not talk about a certain kernel, its disallowed on xda considered warez
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Just curious how much this will actually effect ROM development? I know we have a few custom kernels which make some things better and some worse. So having source I assume will make a more solid kernel. Is it different between ICS and JB?
herousr said:
Just curious how much this will actually effect ROM development? I know we have a few custom kernels which make some things better and some worse. So having source I assume will make a more solid kernel. Is it different between ICS and JB?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
New kernels, cm9 and cm10 will be loads less buggy, the list goes on for a while
Sent from my PG86100 using xda app-developers app
Is there any way you can be a bit more specific or tell me more about it?
hello, i ve used kernel coolZ, i m pleased about it!
herousr said:
Is there any way you can be a bit more specific or tell me more about it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without source, a kernel creator can use their skills to cobble together a kernel, but it's next to impossible. The current crop of CDMA kernels were created by taking the GSM source code and adjusting it. Some were more successful than others. Now that the CDMA source had dropped, kernel makers can use it as a foundation to add features.
Read, Search, Read again, ... Then Ask with Tapatalk 2
I'm on the CM10 milestone release but I can only overclock to 1.5ghz. Is there a kernel compatible with the cm10 than can go higher? ktoonsez seems only usable with AOKP.
gearheadvr4 said:
I'm on the CM10 milestone release but I can only overclock to 1.5ghz. Is there a kernel compatible with the cm10 than can go higher? ktoonsez seems only usable with AOKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What makes you think that ktoon's kernel only works with AOKP?
CM is AOSP. AOKP is AOSP. You need a AOSP kernel.
Onward with your newfound info.
Why would u want to Overclock besides for benchmarking? It really serves no purpose
Team Pirate
Sent from Pirateghost's house
yup
I want a faster smoother phone. Plus I want to slightly under volt for better battery life.
Whick version should I use and ideas where to find the correct kernel? All of the ones I've to be so far are tied to full ROMs. I'm pretty happy with the CM10.
Using the search function would answer your question.
Phalanx7621 said:
This isn't another skyrocket or i9100 fail is it? Hope not . Either way using the search function would answer your question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. I have a i747 AT&T. Again I tried searching but all I could pull up was full ROMs not the kernel separate.
gearheadvr4 said:
No. I have a i747 AT&T. Again I tried searching but all I could pull up was full ROMs not the kernel separate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your so lost man.
To the wall with ya!
So much win.
Here's where u get to go next.http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1899004
In his defense 4 and 7 are right next to each other on the keypad. It's POSSIBLE he meant to write i777. Doubtful though...
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app