What is your QS result. Which Rom and Kernal are you on with settings?
Omega 5.1
Siyah 1.0.1
1704mhz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Mine was 5133 but for some reason my CPU was clocked at 1000 instead of 1400 even though I had disabled the power saving etc.
sent with SGS3
Quadrant sucks for multi thread SOC's, better to use something like AnTuTu... There is an even better one.. but I forgot what it's called
So does the s3 only uses the full potential when required? Is that why mine is stuck at 1000mhz while it says maximum is 1400?
sent with SGS3
vasp3690 said:
So does the s3 only uses the full potential when required? Is that why mine is stuck at 1000mhz while it says maximum is 1400?
sent with SGS3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to save battery. it'll only go to its fullest when it really needs to - eg. a graphically intensive game etc.
bortak said:
Quadrant sucks for multi thread SOC's, better to use something like AnTuTu... There is an even better one.. but I forgot what it's called
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF Benchmark from Chainfire ???
jje
My quadrant and Antutu scores
Perseus kernel @ 1.8Ghz
JJEgan said:
CF Benchmark from Chainfire ???
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the one. How could I forget :/
5873 with uk stock iys blazing fast phone compared with the note im glad i got it now
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Related
post your htc flyer benchmarks here (neocore , quadrant , linpak, nenamark)
any one got one
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I should Hope it beats the phones you listed!
cant you use something on par with the tablet, like another tablet?
upperkingjr said:
I should Hope it beats the phones you listed!
cant you use something on par with the tablet, like another tablet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tablets.use.the same internals as smartphones.
here is mine. how you guys have such a high score?
L.E. got it better!
Has any one tried neocore
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
This was my third run but they were all about the same.
Why does the flyer get such low score in quadrant? My Motorola Defy (oc to 1000mhz) gets a lot more than that.
drinkluder1 said:
Why does the flyer get such low score in quadrant? My Motorola Defy (oc to 1000mhz) gets a lot more than that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because your phone is junk! No just kidding, the quadrant score don't mean anything that I can find? On my old sgs I was rooted over clock my bench mark was like 1200 my wife was stock her bench mark was like 700 and to login to the Internet, go into sites, download apps, games everything was the same speed as mine?
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
So I put SuperVibe on last night and am absolutely loving it. I have CM7 on my Nook and overclocked it to 1.3 via the CM7 integrated settings. I want to do the same on my Vibrant. I was just wondering what the best clock would be to do. I'd like to keep a good battery life, and would like to see a nice little improvement performance wise.
Any suggestions?
I think supercm7vide comes with Neo kernel. With that kernel, the Max oc is 1.6.
One good app to use to oc and undervolt is voltagecontrol.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
geoffcorey said:
I think supercm7vide comes with Neo kernel. With that kernel, the Max oc is 1.6.
One good app to use to oc and undervolt is voltagecontrol.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it does go up to 1.6, though I read somewhere it's not recommended to go that high. Is using the CM7 settings sufficient? Or should I look into that app you mentioned? And is bumping it up 1.3ish fine?
Thanks
yeah, using cm settings will work, but you could find you're unstable even at 1.3, but using voltage control, you can try to stabilize it by undervolting.
Im running the latest cm7 nightly with neo 10 kernel at 1440 mhz btw i undervolted using voltage control and i cant say much 4 the battery cuz i only used it 4 a day but its stable 4 me
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH T959 w/ CM7 (theme -> synergy), neo 10 kernel
Jave scores seem low. What affects java scores and what can be done to improve them?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
what do u mean by low?
Look at "Your Device"
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I always see low java scores with CF Bench, it's not a confusion over which score to look at.
I get super low Java scores using the cm kernel as well, lower then stock froyo atrix
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using XDA App
jackxlj said:
I get super low Java scores using the cm kernel as well, lower then stock froyo atrix
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me as well. I wonder why...stock kernel must have something CM7 kernel doesn't.
agurzhiy said:
what do u mean by low?
Look at "Your Device"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your java score is double what I am getting. Is this using kholks updated kernel?
I'm wondering this as well..what is it testing.for the java score
I flashed fauxs 1.9 kernel and aura and now java scores back to normal
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
I was an avid user of Chrome on my GNex until I found the stock Browser was faster. Now today, I wanted to see for myself which browser was faster using benchmark tests.
As unreliable as some benchmarks can be, there is some truth regarding scored. The lowest score pictured was on the stock Browser, and chrome had the highest score. I was surprised.
Both tests were, of course, ran with all background apps closed, same governor, cfq scheduler, etc.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
BFirebird101 said:
I was an avid user of Chrome on my GNex until I found the stock Browser was faster. Now today, I wanted to see for myself which browser was faster using benchmark tests.
As unreliable as some benchmarks can be, there is some truth regarding scored. The lowest score pictured was on the stock Browser, and chrome had the highest score. I was surprised.
Both tests were, of course, ran with all background apps closed, same governor, cfq scheduler, etc.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if that "fastest score" is the new stock Android S4.
JerzeyLegend said:
I wonder if that "fastest score" is the new stock Android S4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Hello XDA members,
My friend found a Kernel that allows to clock his phone at 1.2Ghz.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
He got it from this YouTube Video.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH5ta4hUVCc
So with your help can we confirm if it is Fake or Legit?
He did an Antutu Benchmark test and it the difference between the CPU scores were 1, so I think it is fake.
BTW the video is in Spanish!
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk
-SyncSoft- said:
Hello XDA members,
My friend found a Kernel that allows to clock his phone at 1.2Ghz.
He got it from this YouTube Video.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH5ta4hUVCc
So with your help can we confirm if it is Fake or Legit?
He did an Antutu Benchmark test and it the difference between the CPU scores were 1, so I think it is fake.
BTW the video is in Spanish!
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its fake of course as benchmark resulted with 1 score difference. There are some miscalculating with the kernel probably
Angryace said:
its fake of course as benchmark resulted with 1 score difference. There are some miscalculating with the kernel probably
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, I have already stated that I think it is fake. But looking into it more, it looks like an older version of the Rafael.baugis kernel which I think used to have a placebo with the clocking.
Moderator, please close this thread.
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk