Screen shots below. Overall, here is my impression coming from pure stock unrooted .211:
* smoother scrolling, less lag, overall snappier feel.
* significantly less heat coming from my RAZR MAXX when using.
* getting a stronger, more consistent 4g signal... haven't gone into 3g only coverage areas yet, so can't speak to 3g.
* wifi DL/UL speeds appears to be more consistent with less variance in peaks and dips.
* battle life is way up, but that is anecdotal at this point... will post supporting data when I get a few more days use under my belt.
Anyone else have findings to share?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
Snappier, better 4g lock, less memory use, and no bugs noticed so far.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda premium
Quick update on battery life, this is with what I consider heavy use (WiFi, BT, Corporate push and Gmail, heavy browsing, watched an episode of Breaking Bad on MX Player, etc.):
Batt Level --> 70% with 9h 30m on Battery
Screen On --> 3h 10m (50% brightness)
Significantly better performance for me over .211.
My view from other post very similar to this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1774432
Hindle1225 said:
I've run .214 and .215. I've noticed some very slight improvements with these two over .211. I would say connection seems more stable and phone lag been improved a bit. However it seems that these roms don't lock in my gps location near as quick as .211 did.
__
€ incognito »
™
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit: 7-16-12, I believe the hand off between 3g/4g and visa versa in .215 is not as seamless as it was with .214. I noticed this using streaming radio.
Related
I noticed today that my WIFI was exceptionally slow on my device. Being 4 feet away from my wireless router, i was getting 1-5 mbps speed..
my router has a function that lists connected wifi devices and the assumed connection speed.. it said my Transformer was connected at 58mbps.. so something was fishy
Everything was exceptionally slow, even browsing. after a simple full shutdown and startup it was back to normal. maybe this is the wifi bug some people were having? anyways, a restart made it exceptionally better
anyone else come across this?
Haven't seen this yet but it does sound like your unit has a wifi defect. :banghead: I can say the following two things:
1. The operating channel/frequency does seem to make small differences. Probably noise in my environment.
2. Wireless range seems to be short. I'm getting no where as good of range as my iPhone can. I'd say its short by a good 25 feet or so.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Look at the face staring at the wall...
Sent from my VS910 4G using xda premium
DaRacerz said:
Haven't seen this yet but it does sound like your unit has a wifi defect. :banghead: I can say the following two things:
1. The operating channel/frequency does seem to make small differences. Probably noise in my environment.
2. Wireless range seems to be short. I'm getting no where as good of range as my iPhone can. I'd say its short by a good 25 feet or so.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well the weird thing, im normally fine. i play was playing spotify (high BW audio) in my driveway (through two walls and total about 50 feet) and was getting great reception.
just had this one issue. weird.
It's not a bug. The 58Mbs is the reported link rate, not the actual throughput. Many people mistake the link rate for bandwidth.
I think some of the lag mentioned (elsewhere) are due to poor wifi connectivity.
Previously I had been running Rootbox and could get my phone to last about 24 hours with my normal use, but only about 3 to 5 hours of screen on time depending on the use. I started using the PA 4.3 nightlies a few days ago and seem to be getting much better battery life and I was wondering if anyone else trying 4.3 was seeing an increase as well.
This has been about average for my battery life for three days now without any major differences in use, other than using it longer with the longer screen on time. I will say that I tend to keep my brightness all the way down unless I am outside as even the lowest brightness is plenty bright for me (sometimes being lowered further by using screen filter at night) so this isn't representative of most people's use, but still an interesting improvement.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
overall yes
I have been only using 4.3 on CM but from reading posts and personal experience, 4.3 does have a better battery life. I'm usually sitting at a desk all day so I don't use my phone too much but when I'm home I do occasionally watch videos and play games. I prefer the auto adjusting screen just cuz I'm too lazy to go adjust the screen according to my environment. I may check out PA 4.3 to compare.
Adjusting the brightness hasn't been too much of a problem for me as I always enabled status bar brightness adjusting but unfortunately this build of PA doesn't have it, so I will probably end up just using the auto brightness since it allows advanced customization for what percent to set brightness at certain light levels.
Havent realy noticed better battery life but much smoother transition animation on 4.3 vs touchwiz or even 4.2.2 love the pac man build based on cm10.2
Hey everyone, was thinking of buying this phone (snapdragon version) from aliexpress, read the other thread but it didn't answer my questions. I would be upgrading from an i9300 samsung (yeah it's old as heck, but it still works kinda flawlessly (messed up the gsm/3g network antenna)). I understand that performance wise the difference will be night and day, but after looking at a few reviews online i'm starting to wounder about the camera quality. If i compare to the 13mpx camera on the mtk version the photos in average lighting and video in average lighting look worse than those same samples taken on the 8mpx i9300 ones. I take videos a few times a week and i usually take out my phone to shoot photos of some modeling projects (usually parts and combinations of then, less often girls), cars and other stuff i like and want a good amount of detail (at least as much as i can get from my S3).
Also how is the network reception? I'm usually at places where network reception is poor for me (again, f-ed up a bit with my phone).
=And a side idea=
Any chance you can fit the 4.1Ah li-ion from the redmi 3/ 3 pro? I have had a few times on some other phones where li-po batteries are in use get hot to an unpleasant degree while charging and never had those issues with li-ion's.
My answer is yes it is worth it, for the money you will not find much better. However it is still a budget phone and it has compromises, the camera is good but not the best, low light performance is grainy as you might expect.
However in good light it can capture very nice detail.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I havent tested video yet but there are some nice video demos of this phone on youtube. It is capable of recording in 4k but the frame rate is a bit choppy.
Reception is fine for me, I cant comment how it will be for you if you usually experience poor signals, my area is usually very good.
I've been noticing that 4G throughput in various contexts is pretty mediocre. With 1-2 bars, it might as well be no service. 3 bars is okay, 4 is good, and 5 bars... I don't remember seeing 5 bars.
I'd say I pull downloads of about 22-25 Mbps and uploads from 1.5 to 3.5 with at least 3 bars.
With 1-2 bars, speeds drop immensely. Downloads drop to 0.4 to 1.3 Mbps and uploads hover around 1.0 Mbps.
I had much better results on my Droid Turbo--but can't really test it now to compare. It just seemed much more robust in poor signal areas, buffered music and video significantly less --so it was not noticeable.
The V30 seems to be buffering all the time. I can barely stream google play stations with mobile network streaming quality set to "high" (not "always high"). It will play 10 seconds and buffer, then keep doing it until signal improves or I toss the phone out the window.
Wifi reception seems equally wimpy whether I'm on a G, N, or AC network compared to my Turbo. When I'm in the same room as the router, I have no issues with speed.
I'm using Ookla's speedtest app.
Curious what others of you on Verizon with a V30 are seeing.
I'm reading this from a location where I typically had poor reception on my Droid Turbo, lots of Pandora interruptions and extremely slow web page loading, and the V30 is 1 to 2 bars 4G but rock sold performance. No speed test, but not sensing an issue like I had been.
So doing side by side my new LgV30 vs my old Nexus 6P. Wifi only since the 6P is no longer on service. The Nexus is faster, not significantly but it is faster. 6P 4.02 d/4.09 u LG 2.72 D/3.88 up. Both with 5ms ping. I've run the test several times and the 6P wins every time.
Here's one I took yesterday... note the signal bars.
At what point do I visit the verizon store and cry about it?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Ok, I just saw this on sakitech but I thought it worth mentioning. Making this change has reduced my power usage to approximately 3-4% per hour with regular use, so far today. Which is amazing for me.
Under settings, battery, go to the bottom, more battery settings, performance profile. Change it to LIGHT.
I feel absolutely no difference on the device in terms of usage. It still feels just as fast. Scream has not dropped in display quality and nor has brightness gone down. But the battery life is just better for me.
Interested to know if anyone else has done this and seen any difference.
I want S23 ultra levels of battery performance, not iPhone. I'm loving the battery life on this thing!
alltaken123 said:
I want S23 ultra levels of battery performance, not iPhone. I'm loving the battery life on this thing!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, agreed. It's amazing. This seems to have made it even better.
Just switched over to light, let's see what happens. Though I've routinely been getting 11 of SOT so it wasn't that bad to begin with.
chetly968 said:
Just switched over to light, let's see what happens. Though I've routinely been getting 11 of SOT so it wasn't that bad to begin with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same. I'm intrigued to see the results
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've tried both modes and I didn't find any diffirence. Both modes are snappy and battery life is about the same. Maybe it's just for me tho. I did a geekbench benchmark and results about the same too
Well my battery is at 70% after nearly 8 hours since I powered up. That's unheard of for me on a Samsung device. I'm usually below 40% by now.
Have given it a go. Cheers for the tip