http://www.androidcentral.com/cyanogenmod-9-rc2-emerges-new-devices-stability-improvements
So its not like I didn't see it coming when samsung hired steve, but geeeeez. Samsung devices are #1 priority I guess these days. I liked it better when the love was more evenly distibuted. But its good news anyway.
I think this is more news worthy:
CM9? Bleh, who cares.
Samsung also donated some devices to the CM team a while back, and generally release source faster than HTC.
don't they also have a bigger market share?
I haven't had a Samsung smartphone, just posting from what I've seen
miguelfp1 said:
Samsung also donated some devices to the CM team a while back, and generally release source faster than HTC.
don't they also have a bigger market share?
I haven't had a Samsung smartphone, just posting from what I've seen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure Sammy is the biggest smart phone manufacturer in the world.
Honestly, the next phone I get, HTC and Sammy are battling for my money. I said after my Epic that I would never buy another Sammy phone, so I skipped the SII in favor Photon because I felt the 3D was useless. Now that I've played with the SIII and the EVO LTE I am fairly equally impressed by both devices.
It's going to come down to support and device build, who releases source the fastest and who updates the devices the best and which one builds the best feeling device.
Assuming there is an S4 and Sammy doesn't blow it, I could very well see my self getting it.
Kcarpenter said:
I think this is more news worthy:
CM9? Bleh, who cares.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, yea I saw that. Exciting, although I don't expect to see it close to a RC for another few months.
swaze said:
LOL, yea I saw that. Exciting, although I don't expect to see it close to a RC for another few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Few months for RC, yeah...hell some CM's never leave Alpha haha.
Suitable for Daily Driving in a few weeks at most I would say.
where would one find this ROM?
jsufx said:
where would one find this ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not released yet. Still No Wifi and the RIL isn't playing nicely - as is almost always the case with CDMA devices - so No Voice or Data either.
Pretty much from what I gathered it boots and runs and that's about it.
We would get this if we had official support. We knew it wasn't coming for us.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Samsung doesn't release sources quicker than HTC.
And Samsung thinks it's fun to brick our devices. Google emmc brick bug.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
MemoryController said:
Samsung doesn't release sources quicker than HTC.
And Samsung thinks it's fun to brick our devices. Google emmc brick bug.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have been lately.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
What? Still no 4.0.4 kernel sources
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Kcarpenter said:
Pretty sure Sammy is the biggest smart phone manufacturer in the world.
Honestly, the next phone I get, HTC and Sammy are battling for my money. I said after my Epic that I would never buy another Sammy phone, so I skipped the SII in favor Photon because I felt the 3D was useless. Now that I've played with the SIII and the EVO LTE I am fairly equally impressed by both devices.
It's going to come down to support and device build, who releases source the fastest and who updates the devices the best and which one builds the best feeling device.
Assuming there is an S4 and Sammy doesn't blow it, I could very well see my self getting it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does Sammy make all of the Nexus phones? I would get that if I were you, and you're interested in getting lots of updates and development. That'll be my next phone if Sprint doesn't wait 6 months after release to sell it.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
PsiPhiDan said:
Does Sammy make all of the Nexus phones? I would get that if I were you, and you're interested in getting lots of updates and development. That'll be my next phone if Sprint doesn't wait 6 months after release to sell it.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They don't make all of the nexus line.. HTC had one early on. Google has just chosen to go with sammy lately
MemoryController said:
Samsung doesn't release sources quicker than HTC.
And Samsung thinks it's fun to brick our devices. Google emmc brick bug.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SIII source was available as soon as the phone was released.
Rxpert said:
SIII source was available as soon as the phone was released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source for the Epic 4G Touch was also released shortly before it got its ICS update. Samsung definitely knows how to please the community.
SoraX64 said:
We would get this if we had official support. We knew it wasn't coming for us.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who said we weren't getting official cm? The source was just released sooooooo
eao1991 said:
Source for the Epic 4G Touch was also released shortly before it got its ICS update. Samsung definitely knows how to please the community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless you take into account they're timely updates
-Cupper- said:
Who said we weren't getting official cm? The source was just released sooooooo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he just meant we should have known we weren't getting RC2 since we haven't obtained official support yet.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
guih said:
Unless you take into account they're timely updates
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung does update quick. Ignoring the wider user base of GSM carriers, CDMA carriers such as VZW and Sprint always tend to lag behind updates. Due to CDMA restrictions that can't be open-sourced, Samsung doesn't control the entire software update and adds to the delay. Take a look at devices that were released with Gingerbread and see how many of those have ICS. Chances are they're almost all GSM devices.The HTC Rezound on Verizon came out later than the Epic 4G Touch and has yet to see ICS. The Evo 3D and Design 4G won't see ICS till next month. Besides, the Epic 4G Touch was receiving ICS leaks since early this year.
-Cupper- said:
Who said we weren't getting official cm? The source was just released sooooooo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No one said that. But we DON'T as of now so of course we didn't get the update.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Related
http://briefmobile.com/cyanogenmod-9-construction-under-way
That's great, how about a stable CM7 for us?
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App, drinking a 'tini
Don't think most really care about cm7. I mean if you want to spend days/weeks working on an obsolete OS go for it. That's why no one is working on cm7.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Upstater said:
That's great, how about a stable CM7 for us?
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App, drinking a 'tini
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, would still love a stable CM7. When I got this phone on launch day I told myself that I'll wait to root until there is a stable CM7. Finally I said screw it, and by then I had hboot 1.50. Kinda sucks.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
flonker said:
Yeah, would still love a stable CM7. When I got this phone on launch day I told myself that I'll wait to root until there is a stable CM7. Finally I said screw it, and by then I had hboot 1.50. Kinda sucks.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should have rooted and then wait for CM7.
but anyways, stable CM7 should be coming.
@cyanogen cyanogen
We're still going to get CM7.2 out the door while CM9 is being worked on.
unknown1205 said:
you should have rooted and then wait for CM7.
but anyways, stable CM7 should be coming.
@cyanogen cyanogen
We're still going to get CM7.2 out the door while CM9 is being worked on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, probably. lol. Didn't think HTC was gonna screw me over like this. Was planning on never buying an HTC product again, but now there are leaks of a possible 2.5ghz quad-core...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Ok...I'll ask...what happened to CM"8"?
Holyrolla said:
Ok...I'll ask...what happened to CM"8"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM8 would have been honeycomb.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Nevermind...It was as I figured...no Honeycomb...but isn't Honeycomb source in the repo now?
EDIT: Thanks Flonker
Holyrolla said:
Nevermind...It was as I figured...no Honeycomb...but isn't Honeycomb source in the repo now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I think they released it, but now that ICS is the standard for both phones and tabs, it will be interesting to see how much effort gets put into development of honeycomb.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Holyrolla said:
Nevermind...It was as I figured...no Honeycomb...but isn't Honeycomb source in the repo now?
EDIT: Thanks Flonker
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in there but not fully tagged throughout like other builds are. So it'd be tough to find all the specific honeycomb parts.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
This phone has me wanting to drop it for a Galaxy Nexus once it's out...
The 3D I really don't care much about. It was the hardware that sold me. This is un-selling it for me.
thefoodman52 said:
This phone has me wanting to drop it for a Galaxy Nexus once it's out...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Early next year, my wife's contract is up with Verizon and she'll be switching to Sprint. She's volunteered to take my Evo 3D and I plan on snagging either a Galaxy Nexus or whatever the new hotness is at the time. I've always wanted one of the Nexus variants so that's probably what I'll end up with.
Will it be available for EVO 3d gsm?
Sent from a sad Evo 3d gsm owner, using xda app! :'(
rahditzz said:
Will it be available for EVO 3d gsm?
Sent from a sad Evo 3d gsm owner, using xda app! :'(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not without someone developing it.
The EVO 3D GSM dev Forum really needs some help.
ive been using cm7 since it became available and mine has been running great! i dont care much for the 3d or 4g though!
sweet cant wait for this i miss cm7 but want a stable build before i throw it on here. cool stuff tho.
We’ve been hard at work on CM9 since Google released Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) into the wild last month, and things are slowly starting to come together. Google did a great job with ICS and added some really awesome features which in some cases replace or deprecate functionality that we had in CM7, so we are reevaluating all of our customizations. A number of devices are already up and running with CM9, and the focus is currently on getting as many devices ready as we can. The first devices (besides the Nexus S, which you can already get from Koush’s section on ROM Manager) that we’ll have ready will mostly likely be devices based on OMAP4, MSM8660/7X30, and Exynos. We also have some Tegra2 tablets in the pipeline such as the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and Asus Transformer. Our goal is to provide continued support to all CM7 devices back to the QSD8250 series of devices such as the Nexus One. I don’t want to make any promises at this time, but that is the plan. And sorry Droid1 owners, we’re dropping support for you. Time to upgrade
There are a number of challenges that we are up against. Google has made some pretty major changes to the Android framework that break compatibility with older proprietary camera and graphics drivers in order to achieve some pretty insane performance, but I am confident that the team will be able to overcome these issues like we have in the past.
For those of you who like to build CM from source yourself, you probably know that the spin-up time when starting a CM7 build is absurdly long due to the high number of devices in our repository. Koush and Arcee have put together a solution to this problem that adds new devices on-demand to your local repository, saving on both bandwidth and the long startup time. Some other great enhancements are coming too, like a completely overhauled music app, a new file manager, and a new launcher based on stock 4.0.
If you have a Nexus S, you can check out the code and build for yourself today. More devices are on the way, and I’ll send out these status updates as we make more progress.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/cm9-progress-update?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
http://gigaom.com/mobile/want-andro...tm_campaign=Feed:+jkOnTheRun+(GigaOM:+Mobile)
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
That really sucks.
Seems like the gist of the message is that US carriers have so much individual bloatware to account for (sprint tv, nascar, vcast, etc) that an HTC or Samsung can't just roll out a generic ICS for each device. That's what sucks.
Almost makes me want to wait until november for the next nexus phone but I can't wait that long and Samsung seems to be on top of their game as far as upgrading to ICS before anyone else.
Yes, Samsung is on top of their game and I can also assure you that once Samsung ICS update.drops, so will their kernel source. There won't be any of the waiting 2-4 months BS that HTC is notorious for to release source.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
P_M_G said:
Seems like the gist of the message is that US carriers have so much individual bloatware to account for (sprint tv, nascar, vcast, etc) that an HTC or Samsung can't just roll out a generic ICS for each device. That's what sucks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep pretty much.
ncfastls1 said:
Almost makes me want to wait until november for the next nexus phone but I can't wait that long and Samsung seems to be on top of their game as far as upgrading to ICS before anyone else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
troyboytn said:
Yes, Samsung is on top of their game and I can also assure you that once Samsung ICS update.drops, so will their kernel source. There won't be any of the waiting 2-4 months BS that HTC is notorious for to release source.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm must be recent that Samsung stepped up their game at updating phones.... When I had my Epic 4g (not touch), it took Samsung forever to update to gingerbread.
DarkManX4lf said:
Yep pretty much.
Hmmm must be recent that Samsung stepped up their game at updating phones.... When I had my Epic 4g (not touch), it took Samsung forever to update to gingerbread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wont know for sure till a US variant gets an official update... But they seem to be doing a bit better... And the epic 4g (not touch) gingerbread woes are blamed on alot of things but mostly samsungs failed effort of a update in a timely matter
I've just learned to take a deep breath and enjoy what we have, our devs are making some very good highly efficient sense roms. Ics is super cool don't get me wrong, but must of us are stuck on gingerbread for a while. Might as well find a good rom, flash some themes if need be and relax. Very happy with performance and battery life with the 2.17 base sense rom. Its surely good enough to hold me until the end of the year until ics finally drops. :beer:
sent from a Mean Evo 3d with ICS sprinkles
P_M_G said:
Seems like the gist of the message is that US carriers have so much individual bloatware to account for (sprint tv, nascar, vcast, etc) that an HTC or Samsung can't just roll out a generic ICS for each device. That's what sucks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which makes zero sense to me bc there's no way those apps req that much testing to be able for the OS upgrade...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
sgt. slaughter said:
Which makes zero sense to me bc there's no way those apps req that much testing to be able for the OS upgrade...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt its just about bloat... HTC sends a build to sprint and they send it back if it has bugs/w.e. And that process is continuous until everything is the way sprint/HTC wants it...
If it was just to add bloat we would have had leaks/ota by now...
(my views/what I heard about it)
I honestly am gonna blame HTC (no support for this phone/constant excuses regarding updates/source)
If they didnt have 50+ devices on the market to deal with (updates and bug fixes) im sure ICS would be here sooner...
Honestly, what's the hype? I flashed ics to my tablet and went right back, not that impressed.
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
gilbydakid said:
Honestly, what's the hype? I flashed ics to my tablet and went right back, not that impressed.
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like any other os... Bettery life... Speed improvments... Hardware acceleration... All marketing features... I still think gingerbread could be improved
Bear gri11z said:
I doubt its just about bloat... HTC sends a build to sprint and they send it back if it has bugs/w.e. And that process is continuous until everything is the way sprint/HTC wants it...
If it was just to add bloat we would have had leaks/ota by now...
(my views/what I heard about it)
I honestly am gonna blame HTC (no support for this phone/constant excuses regarding updates/source)
If they didnt have 50+ devices on the market to deal with (updates and bug fixes) im sure ICS would be here sooner...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That last part is very true which is why they are trying to downsize the amount of phones they put out this yr
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
troyboytn said:
Yes, Samsung is on top of their game and I can also assure you that once Samsung ICS update.drops, so will their kernel source. There won't be any of the waiting 2-4 months BS that HTC is notorious for to release source.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My next phone will probably be from Samsung...probably (If they keep it up).
NSTar1 said:
My next phone will probably be from Samsung...probably (If they keep it up).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't mind MOTO for their radio but they fail everywhere else
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57402420-94/android-5.0-aka-jelly-bean-rumored-for-q3-release/
Google I/O is in Q3 so we can probably expect it by then.
Just for those of you wondering how long until Jellybean. Hopefully, if they keep releasing new versions, manufacturers will start dropping their skins so they can keep up. (I know that's never going to happen, but wishful thinking!)
yousefak said:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57402420-94/android-5.0-aka-jelly-bean-rumored-for-q3-release/
Google I/O is in Q3 so we can probably expect it by then.
Just for those of you wondering how long until Jellybean. Hopefully, if they keep releasing new versions, manufacturers will start dropping their skins so they can keep up. (I know that's never going to happen, but wishful thinking!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
coming to HTC....sometime much later in 2013
I wonder if HTC will just give up and release just ICS for their older phones and work on Jelly Bean for their new ones
Bloody HTC, I doubt our phones will ever get an official release of this.
poweroutlet said:
Bloody HTC, I doubt our phones will ever get an official release of this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Evo 4G will never and was never planned to receive ICS, and yet there are completely functioning ICS builds available for it, with working camera on top of everything else besides the obvious 4G (and maybe a few other things, I haven't followed OG Evo development since I upgraded to this phone).
Official releases aren't a huge deal unless we need them to fix something. The problem with ICS on our phones have to do with the difference between it and GB, as well as our camera. I do not foresee JB to be a big difference from ICS, kind of like Froyo to GB.
So in the end an official release won't matter as long as JB isn't a huge difference over ICS, and we can use the official ICS release in order to make sure the camera works.
You're going to be able to run JB on this phone, do not worry.
SoraX64 said:
The Evo 4G will never and was never planned to receive ICS, and yet there are completely functioning ICS builds available for it, with working camera on top of everything else besides the obvious 4G (and maybe a few other things, I haven't followed OG Evo development since I upgraded to this phone).
Official releases aren't a huge deal unless we need them to fix something. The problem with ICS on our phones have to do with the difference between it and GB, as well as our camera. I do not foresee JB to be a big difference from ICS, kind of like Froyo to GB.
So in the end an official release won't matter as long as JB isn't a huge difference over ICS, and we can use the official ICS release in order to make sure the camera works.
You're going to be able to run JB on this phone, do not worry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know the phones hardware is more than capable of handling JB. And I'd agree with everything you said, but our phone has some unique needs that others don't. Like you mentioned, the 3d/camera is one of them and also Wimax. ICS has been around for quite a while and there isn't a single ICS build for our phone that is a nice stable daily driver. Getting some of our phone's features to work without the help of HTC may be a bit tough. The development scene of the Evo 3D isn't huge either, though thankfully we have many great devs.
I came to the Evo 3d from the HTC HD2, now that's a phone that seems to be able to run just about anything. Ridiculously massive development scene. It had ICS running long before many other phones and it isn't even an android phone.
poweroutlet said:
I know the phones hardware is more than capable of handling JB. And I'd agree with everything you said, but our phone has some unique needs that others don't. Like you mentioned, the 3d/camera is one of them and also Wimax. ICS has been around for quite a while and there isn't a single ICS build for our phone that is a nice stable daily driver. Getting some of our phone's features to work without the help of HTC may be a bit tough. The development scene of the Evo 3D isn't huge either, though thankfully we have many great devs.
I came to the Evo 3d from the HTC HD2, now that's a phone that seems to be able to run just about anything. Ridiculously massive development scene. It had ICS running long before many other phones and it isn't even an android phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can agree with that, mostly. What I'm trying to say is that, after a release from HTC, we hopefully won't have to worry too much about JB in the future.
Plus as long as jellybean drops within eighteen months technically we are supposed to get it .
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
I would almost be happy if jelly bean would wait, I would like to see a aosp ics rom fully functional first. We haven't seen a really smooth aosp rom out of alpha yet for the 3d. Either way. Just getting tired of sense but that's just me.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
ace9988 said:
coming to HTC....sometime much later in 2013
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A little optimistic?
ace9988 said:
coming to HTC....sometime much later in 2013
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol... even though they will initially anounce "early" or "first quarter" 2013!
ace9988 said:
coming to HTC....sometime much later in 2013
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's when we get ics on the 3D
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
People talking about jellybean, not even realizing its not for phones.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
fpineda101 said:
That's when we get ics on the 3D
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmao...
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
bloodrain954 said:
People talking about jellybean, not even realizing its not for phones.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not confirmed so I wouldn't spread it like it is.
This is a rumor at time of writing
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Jelly bean Pfft get ICS working before they come out with something else
Sent from my SPH-D600 using XDA Premium App
bloodrain954 said:
People talking about jellybean, not even realizing its not for phones.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Careful with those words as that's not even close to being confirmed...nor does it make much sense...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
sl4sh3r said:
Jelly bean Pfft get ICS working before they come out with something else
Sent from my SPH-D600 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With that I totally agree
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Even when jelly bean gets released you can easily add another 12 months onto that before there's a working evo version
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using XDA
Hey guys, why are people talking about jailbait in this thread?
http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...4-1-2-build-ls970zvb-starting-to-trickle-out/
Joecascio2000 said:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...4-1-2-build-ls970zvb-starting-to-trickle-out/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't hold your breath...
Also, better things are forthcoming...
Was this official ota's or just a soak test?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
tmease1 said:
Was this official ota's or just a soak test?
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is unsure at this point.
From the link in the OP.
All with nary a word from The Now Network, which is usually pretty on top of announcing updates for devices. Ergo, at this point, we're not entirely sure if this is the start of a full-on rollout or just a "soak test" of sorts. We're thinking the former, but until official word is muttered from the lips of Sprint, it's a crapshoot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From having previous experience with Att and Android it could still be a while. Att gets in no hurry for updates. I don't know what is involved with their testing of new firmware but it's ridiculous.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
tmease1 said:
From having previous experience with Att and Android it could still be a while. Att gets in no hurry for updates. I don't know what is involved with their testing of new firmware but it's ridiculous.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the testing isn't what kills it... I think att doesn't test at all half the time. What do they have to lose if we don't get updates. People rarely get mad at carriers when the manufacturer can be blamed.
It would not surprise me find out att won't push the update because it says "lg" at the top of the phone instead of "att"
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Snow_fox said:
I think the testing isn't what kills it... I think att doesn't test at all half the time. What do they have to lose if we don't get updates. People rarely get mad at carriers when the manufacturer can be blamed.
It would not surprise me find out att won't push the update because it says "lg" at the top of the phone instead of "att"
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and why incur the cost, if there's virtually no recourse for not releasing the updated OS. But if that's going to be the case, have the manufacturer release the upgrades, requiring that their own crapware is included in the release.
dbgeek said:
and why incur the cost, if there's virtually no recourse for not releasing the updated OS. But if that's going to be the case, have the manufacturer release the upgrades, requiring that their own crapware is included in the release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys, you've got to remember that us, the people on XDA, arent the majority. Most people don't know what jellybean is and if they do they couldn't tell you the difference in jelly bean and ICS. AT&T knows this so they don't bother with updates, they're lazy and couldn't care less about the minority. Honestly, i don't think any of the people who handle the updates at AT&T know whats new in jellybean. Maybe they should hire some xda devs to handle their updates haha
crward said:
Guys, you've got to remember that us, the people on XDA, arent the majority. Most people don't know what jellybean is and if they do they couldn't tell you the difference in jelly bean and ICS. AT&T knows this so they don't bother with updates, they're lazy and couldn't care less about the minority. Honestly, i don't think any of the people who handle the updates at AT&T know whats new in jellybean. Maybe they should hire some xda devs to handle their updates haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heck, with how well this phone runs on ICS, aside from getting Google Now I'm still not entirely clear on what the JB ROMs we have give us, and I generally pay attention to these things...
Sent from my LG Optimus G - I can't believe it's not Project Butter!
bassitone said:
Heck, with how well this phone runs on ICS, aside from getting Google Now I'm still not entirely clear on what the JB ROMs we have give us, and I generally pay attention to these things...
Sent from my LG Optimus G - I can't believe it's not Project Butter!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree, I'm honestly kinda scared that the jellybean update could make the experience worse, at least an official update. This is the best phone I've ever used, even with ICS and little rom support. We've got great devs and even the stock experience isnt bad. Plus, google now is cool but I'm happy with this phone as is, I've got my nexus 7 for that haha
I had CM10.1 on my last phone, I really don't feel like I'm missing anything significant at all with rooted stock ics on this phone...
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
I'm happy with rooted stock as well, except that I am hoping for a reduction in the excessive msm_hsic_host wakelocks that drain our batteries (seems this was fixed on the Nexus 4).
crward said:
I completely agree, I'm honestly kinda scared that the jellybean update could make the experience worse, at least an official update. This is the best phone I've ever used, even with ICS and little rom support. We've got great devs and even the stock experience isnt bad. Plus, google now is cool but I'm happy with this phone as is, I've got my nexus 7 for that haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's quite a bit faster on jellybean and has Google now and a different font and a better modem.
bassitone said:
Heck, with how well this phone runs on ICS, aside from getting Google Now I'm still not entirely clear on what the JB ROMs we have give us, and I generally pay attention to these things...
Sent from my LG Optimus G - I can't believe it's not Project Butter!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
does this means that a dev could get the update rom from sprint and port it to att? or are the phones too much dissimilar to do that?
We have jelly bean already. I am running the version found in the developer section and I love it
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
tnayrbj said:
We have jelly bean already. I am running the version found in the developer section and I love it
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been on SnowJB for a while now. It's still about the principle. Sprint released jb, even if it is just a soak test. AT&T is usually the last to get out updates for devices that have been released on multiple carriers. From my experience and research it is usually T-Mobile first, Sprint second, and ATT/Verizon tied for last.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
No update anytime soon. Trust me. Att wants you to buy new hardware. (Lgog pro)
They make money buy getting new contracts. After new og hits we get jb. I had HTC vivid there was no ICS till onex was out
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Which version of the LGOG sold world wide is closest to ours?
i'm used to the One X and Rogers&At&T being identical.
drwario said:
No update anytime soon. Trust me. Att wants you to buy new hardware. (Lgog pro)
They make money buy getting new contracts. After new og hits we get jb. I had HTC vivid there was no ICS till onex was out
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes no sense because everyone who bought a LGOG shouldn't be anywhere close to getting another two-year contract. The LGOG is only 5 months old.
Joecascio2000 said:
That makes no sense because everyone who bought a LGOG shouldn't be anywhere close to getting another two-year contract. The LGOG is only 5 months old.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely. I'd like to see things out faster, too, but you hear a lot of pure speculation and conspiracy theories around here.
A
Why is there no 4.2.2 on DNA yet? Didnt the galaxy nexus just get it? What the hell verizon/htc?
123421342 said:
Why is there no 4.2.2 on DNA yet? Didnt the galaxy nexus just get it? What the hell verizon/htc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um, what.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Bigandrewgold said:
Um, what.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he is asking if the DNA have the 4.2.2 JellyBean Update because the Nexus 4 have it and he is complaining about why Verizon or HTC do not give it to us...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cABZfkRcQ6A&feature=youtube_gdata_player
DROID DNA 5
robertmoore208 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cABZfkRcQ6A&feature=youtube_gdata_player
DROID DNA 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what is this?
Lol
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
I'm guessing this is his first HTC device.
haha...must be!!
123421342 said:
Why is there no 4.2.2 on DNA yet? Didnt the galaxy nexus just get it? What the hell verizon/htc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Skinned and heavily modded supported by htc vs pure vanilla supported by Google... I wonder which one will get the updates....
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
darkhelio said:
he is asking if the DNA have the 4.2.2 JellyBean Update because the Nexus 4 have it and he is complaining about why Verizon or HTC do not give it to us...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually he was commenting about the VZW Gnex which did receive 4.2.2 official from verizon. but they have been on the network for a quite a bit longer.
jonesin said:
actually he was commenting about the VZW Gnex which did receive 4.2.2 official from verizon. but they have been on the network for a quite a bit longer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is correct, I don't appreciate the sarcasm guys. The DNA is much more powerful than the Gnex and it has been out since November and so has 4.2.
4.2 mostly added changes for tablets, there really wasn't much changed for phones over 4.1 besides adding that new photosphere. That's mainly the reason why Google didn't bother to give it a new code name. I doubt it's worth the effort to upgrade.
I think everyone needs to remember what goes into these things. Clearly none of you have worked in an IT department before. Google releases a new version. HTC will get it, and then begins customizing it for their devices. They have to adjust the firmware, rebuild sense... it's not small development work. Then it goes into QA for a while to make sure it's up to par. Then it's released to Verzion and goes into their QA. Problems that arise during these phases are corrected and retested. Finally after it's all signed off, it's scheduled for release. That process can and does take months. It's the significant drawback for the android platform. Apple on the other hand would have been done with their initial release. Google Nexus phones get all the upgrades because Google tests everything for them before they release the new version.
123421342 said:
This is correct, I don't appreciate the sarcasm guys. The DNA is much more powerful than the Gnex and it has been out since November and so has 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do realize that the DNA foesnt run stock android.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Bigandrewgold said:
You do realize that the DNA foesnt run stock android.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but the change from 4.1 to 4.2.isn't that drastic that it would take this long to release it considering it came out when the DNA did.
drumz0rz said:
4.2 mostly added changes for tablets, there really wasn't much changed for phones over 4.1 besides adding that new photosphere. That's mainly the reason why Google didn't bother to give it a new code name. I doubt it's worth the effort to upgrade.
I think everyone needs to remember what goes into these things. Clearly none of you have worked in an IT department before. Google releases a new version. HTC will get it, and then begins customizing it for their devices. They have to adjust the firmware, rebuild sense... it's not small development work. Then it goes into QA for a while to make sure it's up to par. Then it's released to Verzion and goes into their QA. Problems that arise during these phases are corrected and retested. Finally after it's all signed off, it's scheduled for release. That process can and does take months. It's the significant drawback for the android platform. Apple on the other hand would have been done with their initial release. Google Nexus phones get all the upgrades because Google tests everything for them before they release the new version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want the new version mainly for the lock screen changes.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
It is extremely unrealistic to expect a heavily skinned HTC device to get updates at the same speed as a device running just stock vanilla Android.
The Sense overlay is massive, and requires a lot of tuning and customization in order to function properly. Throw a new version of Android at HTC, and they have to spend a lot of time to make 'Sense' of things, if you take my meaning. The first thing they have to figure out is whether or not the update will even improve the user experience. What if there's no benefit to the end user because the update was mainly for tablets (as the previous poster said). Or, is it worth the cost of re-tooling Sense for an extremely minor update?
All this hating on HTC over updates on fairly new phones is really unfair.
Now the Rezound ICS update debacle was unforgivable, but this device hasn't even been out 6 months, and they've already put out an OTA with new radios. Dude, that's freaking awesome support!
So instead of all the negativity, how about congratulating HTC on lessons learned from the Rezound delays, and enjoying what you've got?
Sent from my HTC DNA
BBEgo said:
It is extremely unrealistic to expect a heavily skinned HTC device to get updates at the same speed as a device running just stock vanilla Android.
The Sense overlay is massive, and requires a lot of tuning and customization in order to function properly. Throw a new version of Android at HTC, and they have to spend a lot of time to make 'Sense' of things, if you take my meaning. The first thing they have to figure out is whether or not the update will even improve the user experience. What if there's no benefit to the end user because the update was mainly for tablets (as the previous poster said). Or, is it worth the cost of re-tooling Sense for an extremely minor update?
All this hating on HTC over updates on fairly new phones is really unfair.
Now the Rezound ICS update debacle was unforgivable, but this device hasn't even been out 6 months, and they've already put out an OTA with new radios. Dude, that's freaking awesome support!
So instead of all the negativity, how about congratulating HTC on lessons learned from the Rezound delays, and enjoying what you've got?
Sent from my HTC DNA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right but the new android isn't that different aside from the lock screen. I am not hating on HTC it's more than likely Verizon.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
robertmoore208 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cABZfkRcQ6A&feature=youtube_gdata_player
DROID DNA 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
123421342 said:
You are right but the new android isn't that different aside from the lock screen. I am not hating on HTC it's more than likely Verizon.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man idk why you even started this topic? Have you been on Android or VZW for any length of time whatsoever? This shouldn't be a surprise. I mean we will probably see AOSP 4.2 from one of the devs long before we see 4.2 or even sense 5(which we already have) from VZW. Updates for phones that aren't a Nexus always take a long time and VZW is notorious for making that wait even longer.
ViperDNA
Woah woah woah... Sense is NOT skinned / heavily modded its a completely built up OS based on Aosp/Linux kernel
Two totally different things
http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...d-skins-aosp-sense-touchwiz-xda-developer-tv/
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
123421342 said:
Why is there no 4.2.2 on DNA yet? Didnt the galaxy nexus just get it? What the hell verizon/htc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, my brother got it last week for his Nexus.