Does overclocking degrade CPU performance? - Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

So, I've overclocked my EVO 3D to a reasonable 1.5 GHz(maximum recommended frequency by Qualcomm for S3 processors). Will that degrade its performance? I am talking about long-term effects.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda app-developers app

Yes, overclocking can cause damage to the CPU if it is done too drastically for the processor and used heavily overtime. Since it is the "maximum recommended", you should be quite fine, though it wouldn't hurt to knock it down one step .

fdespotovski said:
So, I've overclocked my EVO 3D to a reasonable 1.5 GHz(maximum recommended frequency by Qualcomm for S3 processors). Will that degrade its performance? I am talking about long-term effects.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As it's maximum recommended, it's fine. Even a little beyond that should be fine. The HTC Sensation XE uses it as default frequency on the same chipset, so your phone should be fine. Your phone might get a bit hotter though.

Actually, you should be just fine. If your maximum CPU frequency scaling is 1.5GHz that doesn't mean it will always run that fast, unless you've got your CPU governor set to not allow for any load relief (I.e.: a "performance" mode). Might be a good idea to underclock your echo 0 table values also, to give a lower 'resting' frequency scale. One more thing to think about is under/overvolting. Obviously, with overclocked CPUs they will discharge more of your battery faster at higher clock speeds. Just something to think about and/or research before editing voltages...
Sent from my Atari Falcon030

if you overclock too much it will heat too much and will damage your phone as well as your hands

wheresmyphone said:
if you overclock too much it will heat too much and will damage your phone as well as your hands
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^This is untrue^^…
If you clock higher than what may be your highest stable CPU clock speed, you will experience freezes and random reboots, etc. Your phone will not explode or anything...
Sent from my Atari Falcon030

just dont charge the phone when u playing some games that uses a lot of resources because your phone will get to really high temperature, in my opinion, its safety to overclock processor to 20% of his maximum freq.
example:
1000 mhz - 1200 mhz
Sent From Xperia Arc Using Xda Premium!

Check the temp of the cpu with system tuner and judge it based on that.

1.4 should be fine
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda app-developers app

Reply
I've got some interesting replies. Keep them coming guys! Based on this results I may be able to collect some valuable info.

a question ... wanted to know because you hear it on the new LG Snapdragon S4 processador implementaro the pro ... that's different to common S4???, and I would like to know whether it is true or not in order if the overlockear prosesador decreases the life of the phone?? in my case a xperia play

Related

[Q] Is Overclocking Galaxy s2 to 1.5 ghz Safe ?

Hi im thinking of doing a overclock to 1.5 ghz is it safe for the processor and the battery life witch already sucks. has anyone on here whos done it using setcpu and the rom had any problems after doing so ? and how much faster is 1.5 ghz compared to 1.2 ghz on the galaxy s2 ? and is it safe in general for the hardware of the phone will the phone get hotter or have over heating problems ? also what should my settings be for minimum maximum and the voltages ?
Of course oc is going to make ur battery life a lot worse.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
I haven' used Setcpu in a while but I believe it's got a feature to stress test the settings to see if it can handle it. Generally the worst that happens is it'll crash. So long as it doesn't get hot. Heat=death for electronics :')
I'm using tegrak (from market) to overclock to 1.4. I found 1.5 was too unstable. Noticeable difference between 1.2 & 1.4 is almost none. Also voltage increase of 50mv was needed to gain stability. There is not much point of overclocking the device IMO unless like me u just get some satisfaction out of knowing its running faster!
Sparksltd said:
I'm using tegrak (from market) to overclock to 1.4. I found 1.5 was too unstable. Noticeable difference between 1.2 & 1.4 is almost none. Also voltage increase of 50mv was needed to gain stability. There is not much point of overclocking the device IMO unless like me u just get some satisfaction out of knowing its running faster!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. I see no difference between 1.2 & 1.5ghz. But that doesn't keep me from running it at 1.5 when I'm playing a game anyway :'D
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
GMoneyDTP said:
Hi im thinking of doing a overclock to 1.5 ghz is it safe for the processor and the battery life witch already sucks. has anyone on here whos done it using setcpu and the rom had any problems after doing so ? and how much faster is 1.5 ghz compared to 1.2 ghz on the galaxy s2 ? and is it safe in general for the hardware of the phone will the phone get hotter or have over heating problems ? also what should my settings be for minimum maximum and the voltages ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it's not safe, that I can say. Nothing is safe when you don't know what other things are changing with the clock rate. But still you could do that. You just have to make sure that the temperature is within limit, it will be definitely high, but make sure it's not that high.
And upping the clock rate to 1.5 GHz won't drain any extra battery than 1.2 GHz.
Regards.
GMoneyDTP said:
Hi im thinking of doing a overclock to 1.5 ghz is it safe for the processor and the battery life witch already sucks. has anyone on here whos done it using setcpu and the rom had any problems after doing so ? and how much faster is 1.5 ghz compared to 1.2 ghz on the galaxy s2 ? and is it safe in general for the hardware of the phone will the phone get hotter or have over heating problems ? also what should my settings be for minimum maximum and the voltages ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried the overclocking and each phone is different, increase then test, there are many benchmarking apps out there, I was stable at 1.4, my kernel does not include 1.5 GHz, and irregardless of what people may say, running the phone at higher clock speeds consistently DOES drain the battery more than 1.2GHz, unless you have found a way to manipulate the laws of physics. I don't see how one can fathom the thought that you can get a faster CPU at absolutely no cost.
Many people think when the CPU running faster means you complete tasks faster, hence 1.5 would complete a task faster than 1.2 and hence save battery, but I believe we use this phone as more than a calculator, so when you are performing a task that causes the CPU to run at 1.5 for a period of time e.g playing a game, browsing or whatever you do with your phone, then the CPU has to draw more power to keep the frequency at 1.5 as compared to the CPU running at 1.2
All in all, I dialed back because I was doing fine without it and I did not need it, other people may need it, and I wasn't gaining anything. to answer your question directly, it all depends on what you do with your phone, I'm not a huge gamer or anything and the 1.2GHz has proven to be more than enough for me to have a very pleasant experience using this device
Using it occasionally is safe, unless you stress your mobile at 1.5+ ghz for more than an hour or so.
The cpu governor will only make use of higher frequencies when there is a need, so mostly you will see your mobile idling at 200 mhz.
HTCinspiration said:
Of course oc is going to make ur battery life a lot worse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not necessarily a lot worse. It depends on how you are using your phone, and what is causing it to run fast. If overclocking allows the phone to spend longer in deep sleep state, your battery will win. If its games, and by OC you achieve a higher frame rate, then the phone is doing more work, and this will be reflected in the battery life going down.
Most of the time, screen on is going to dominate. If you are a low screen-on user, I guess there is more chance for a higher max_cpu to be beneficial (it won't be used unless there is a task that requires it). More accurately, it helps some of the time, so the net result is not always obvious to predict.
How about undervolting?
Any danger in doing so- other than crashing when voltage is too low?
Before over clocking it might be worth downloading cpuspy from the market and seeing what time you spend in each speed.
Chances are most of the time you won't even hit 1.2 so might not have anything to gain by over clocking.
Then again I dont know how you use your device but I do know I was surprised when I found out.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
I've played with the SuperSonic version of this phone (which has a 1.5Ghz core) and the results from photos/video are much better, I'm pretty sure the cameras are exactly the same but the SuperSonic benefits from the higher CPU.
I think it would be cool if somebody could write an app that states
IF user opens Camera application voltage + clock speed is increased to allow stable 1.5GHz speed
WHEN user closes camera application overclock turns off.
Thoughts?
You have a smartphone! Not a pc!
I didnt see any advantage if you oc to 1.5
Btw In normal use your phone keep in 200mhz not 1.2.
I think i only hit 1.2 two or 3 times for 3 seconds in a full battery cycle.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
oc dosnt make sense ,there no noticeable diff,an yes very few times i hit 1.2 mostly its on 800 or few times on 1000....using a device with 1.5ghz proccesor an oc a device to 1.5 ghz which has 1ghz processor is very diff in nature....
Fair enough.
Well I wouldn't mind an app that mazes out at 1.2GHz with camera app open, as it can lag when shooting HD.
oc upto 1.4 ghz is fair enough, anything more than that is a waste. though you cant find any visible difference between 1,1.2 and 1.4 it does helps in maintaining smoothness on some situations.
yes very true i had oc my sgs1 at 1.2ghz and sgs2 at 1.4ghz but frankly i dint see the diff so after few days use i turnd to orignal settings....but many use oc an phone works fine,but depends on personel use......an yes as bala_gammer says its fine on 1.4ghz......cheeeerz
is overclocking galaxy s2 to 1.3gh safe
HEY pople and friends i want to overclock my samsung galaxy s2 to 1.3gh soo is it safe ??????.
imad.d said:
HEY pople and friends i want to overclock my samsung galaxy s2 to 1.3gh soo is it safe ??????.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey mate
u really think 100mhz would make that much change? its safe btw... seen people running s2 at clock speed higher than 1.3ghz
Plz help @..Longtime hd gaming(gta sa,nfs mw , asphalt,modern combat...) using 1.4 ghz is safe?
I also noted that gameloft games are makes more over heat for phone..
Which is the best and safe voltage level for 1.4 ghz 1250mv or 1275mv or 1300mv
Iam using siyah v6.0b5 kernel with wizzedkat 3.1..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Well u do not see much difference on daily usage due to oc..but it does give a smoother experience while playing high quality games
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

CPU Master?

How come whenever i set Antutu CPU master to over clock to 1782 MHz it goes back to 854 MHz? Why? It really annoys me. Im currently using the latest Leedroid rom and the Unity V3 kernel
It wont run at that speed all the time, just when the cpu need to run that fast. If it was constantly running at max speed, your battery would drain in an hour.
no what i mean is that I specify that range would be 384 mhz to 1782 mhz but instead it automatically sets itself back to 384 to 864. I want it to stay at what I specify it to.
Bug in the kernel maybe. Or bug in CPU master.
I remember someone did this on the Galaxy S (my last phone) and limited overclocking to 5 minutes before auto setting speed back to default to save the CPU from damage. Because to maintain stability at the overclocked speed the kernel dev had also set voltage MUCH higher. Which actually could cause damage to the processor so in that case its a good thing he limited overclocking to only 5 minutes.
Which kernel are you running?
I was running unity
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using XDA App
What do you suggest I should run?
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using XDA App

Antutu tester ist saying current CPU frequency 1993,93 Mhz

its saying that since .15 upgrade
Odd
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Actually, I think its the bogomips.
As does mine.
But the AnTuTu Benchmark system info shows the correct stuff. My guess? The actual tester hasn't been updated as frequently as the Benchmark.
If we got that high of a clock, especially with all 4 cores, our Tegra 3's would burn up in like two seconds lol
AnTuTu Battery test was making my Prime so hot I quit it out of fear
buxtahuda said:
As does mine.
But the AnTuTu Benchmark system info shows the correct stuff. My guess? The actual tester hasn't been updated as frequently as the Benchmark.
If we got that high of a clock, especially with all 4 cores, our Tegra 3's would burn up in like two seconds lol
AnTuTu Battery test was making my Prime so hot I quit it out of fear
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's only about 400MHz more than what it's running now, if you unlocked the 1.6GHz setting. I've seen speculation that we might be able to hit 2.0, but it's just that; speculation. I'm hoping it'll become a reality
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA Premium.
SteveG12543 said:
That's only about 400MHz more than what it's running now, if you unlocked the 1.6GHz setting. I've seen speculation that we might be able to hit 2.0, but it's just that; speculation. I'm hoping it'll become a reality
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA Premium.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but that's the point I'm making. 5 minutes running all 4 cores at 1.6 GHz had my Prime at 42 degrees Celsius! 46.2 degrees is when I have my devices all but shut down to about 200 MHz... Like one or two minutes, all 4 cores, at 2.0 GHz, I don't see being actually usable.
Awesome for quick benchmarking? Yes. Awesome when utilized in Power Saving mode and using 2 or 3 cores? Sure.
Usable for gaming with all 4 cores? Hell no lol the Prime would melt IMO
P.s. I personally think we'll top out on the best Primes at about 2.2/2.3, with many users incapable of going past 1.8/1.9 without reboots and freezes and such. Just my own speculation, but the dev's shall show us.
buxtahuda said:
I know, but that's the point I'm making. 5 minutes running all 4 cores at 1.6 GHz had my Prime at 42 degrees Celsius! 46.2 degrees is when I have my devices all but shut down to about 200 MHz... Like one or two minutes, all 4 cores, at 2.0 GHz, I don't see being actually usable.
Awesome for quick benchmarking? Yes. Awesome when utilized in Power Saving mode and using 2 or 3 cores? Sure.
Usable for gaming with all 4 cores? Hell no lol the Prime would melt IMO
P.s. I personally think we'll top out on the best Primes at about 2.2/2.3, with many users incapable of going past 1.8/1.9 without reboots and freezes and such. Just my own speculation, but the dev's shall show us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow mine never gets that hot. Or even hot at all, really. Which governor did you have it set to? I always have mine set to 102MHz-1.6GHz with the interactive governor, and in performance mode, of course.
That's a good estimate for max clock speeds, I'd say. Can't wait to find out what the highest will be though!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA Premium.
SteveG12543 said:
Wow mine never gets that hot. Or even hot at all, really. Which governor did you have it set to? I always have mine set to 102MHz-1.6GHz with the interactive governor, and in performance mode, of course.
That's a good estimate for max clock speeds, I'd say. Can't wait to find out what the highest will be though!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA Premium.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, no scaling.
I realize it's not realistic, things aren't going to run that way, but that's strictly 1.6 GHz for about five straight minutes.
Oh no, running my normal Profiles, it's always Ondemand and lower clocks the lower the battery gets. I stay pretty low on temp with normal use.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda premium via my tethered HTC Vision
but wiki says that max clockrate is 2.0ghz so maybe its capable of doing that? but then its for all arm cortex-a9 so maybe for the future ones? but a15 is out soon

Overclocking the GPU

Is it possible to overclock the Adreno 130 GPU of the HTC Hero? Like with the SGS2 you can overclock the Mali400
I dont think so, since i believe Adreno 130 is not a real GPU like an actual chip, but a part of the CPU that does some GPU functions so we are very restricted...
That makes sense.
Thank you
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
I think it's possible, but would not recommend doing so.
If i am not mistaken our heros work at 576 MHz by default. Changing the value to a higher one could damage the phone, as greater frequencies require more cooling and our heros were not made to deal with that.
Overclocking also means a faster battery drain.
Please correct me if i'm wrong.
mickro said:
I think it's possible, but would not recommend doing so.
If i am not mistaken our heros work at 576 MHz by default. Changing the value to a higher one could damage the phone, as greater frequencies require more cooling and our heros were not made to deal with that.
Overclocking also means a faster battery drain.
Please correct me if i'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is CPU, he is asking GPU, btw I can OC my Hero to 672 MHz CPU without any damage
kemoba said:
That is CPU, he is asking GPU, btw I can OC my Hero to 672 MHz CPU without any damage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, Thank you then (still a newb here)
But doesn't a hero at 672 MHz cause a faster battery drain?
mickro said:
Oh, Thank you then (still a newb here)
But doesn't a hero at 672 MHz cause a faster battery drain?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does, but i like speed over battery, it can still last a day or two

Krait=fast what does Q6= nom &VDCCX= slow mean?

Ok I've found out what my krait speed is and that's all great but next to the krait speed there are 2 more descriptions (Q6 & VDCCX). My Q6 is nom(which I'm guessing is nominal), and my VDCCX is slow. I found all of this in my eng bootloader under system info.
Does anyone know what these other two speeds relate to as far as performance? Cause being binned fast I still have a tough time running at speeds over 1.6 or undervolting and thought maybe these other 2 speeds might be y.
sent from my DNA
Over clocking really depends on each chip but you should be able to get 1.7 easy what are your settings?
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA using xda app-developers app
it means your Q6 is more stable then the VdccX but does not mean it will overclock more then the VdccX. now keep in mind not all chips are equal.
technically
VdccX will not tote a higher overclock without extremely high voltage but then same can be said for a chip aka Q6 binned nominal

Categories

Resources