Hey guys just wondering what is the latest build for ics where can i download it also what does it support and not support???
Um, how about using the search function ?
XxKillerKev7xX said:
Hey guys just wondering what is the latest build for ics where can i download it also what does it support and not support???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with the post above this one. That's the reason God built a search button into the XDA forum, and the reason He's blessed us with google.
Hint: look in the SGS2 development forum for the letters "ICS", then read about what you find.
Even more help (cause I'm such a nice guy):
Relevant forum
EDIT: If you're more interested in stock ROMs...check out sammobile.com (damn, I'm being nice today!).
There are also several threads in the General section outlining exactly what you are asking. I will leave finding them an exercise to you.
Closed.
I would like to see ICS 4.0.4 ported to the S2, as pure as posible.
Is any one working on this?
Mate be prepared to get FLAMMED!!
1. This question is in wrong section
2.CyanogenMod, Hydrogen, AOKP, to name a few.
Kronkels said:
I would like to see ICS 4.0.4 ported to the S2, as pure as posible.
Is any one working on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not supposed to be in development and there are cm9 and other aosp roms that are floating around here that are 4.0.4
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
sorry
sorry I should have posted this in GS2 Q&A section.
No...
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
r8zer said:
Mate be prepared to get FLAMMED!!
1. This question is in wrong section
2.CyanogenMod, Hydrogen, AOKP, to name a few.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know see my post above
Please can somebody move this to the right section, sorry again
Kronkels said:
I would like to see ICS 4.0.4 ported to the S2, as pure as posible.
Is any one working on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah and we would like to see ... n00bs stop posting crap like this is development section. Use some common sense, read forum titles and also sticky topics before creating a thread.
Also there are various ICS roms, go and look.
I love to be flammed thats why I posted it over here, pfff made my excusses, so please delete this topic or place it in the Q&A section.
Nobody's perfect guess you flamers are
how many times must I say sorry????
Kronkels said:
I know see my post above
Please can somebody move this to the right section, sorry again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He posted that before your reply...
Anyway, try Paradox x's AOKP build, Black Infinitum or MIUI v4 if your hearts set on 4.0.4
Sent from my GT-I9100
Check out http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1530179
Paradoxxx has launched a 4.0.4 version yesterday. Since I'm using Resurrection Remix from westcrip I'll not change to any other ICS port. I'm sure westcrip is implementing 4.0.4 also very soon.
Good luck!
Maybe if you ask Samsung nicely there gonna put their best scientists to work and make a android 4.0.4 for the s2 in 6 months.
Read search and all will be found.
Defo not development thread closed.
This Might Be one of the dumbest question to ask. but yeah I feel like im lost here in the s2 section of xda.. So i am seeking answer:
There is three section for developments:
Galaxy S II Original Android Development
Galaxy S II Android Development
Galaxy S II I9100G Android Development
My Phone Model Says GT I9100 so I guess third one is not for me.. but about the 1st two im confused. Which one should is for my phone?
Please help me out.
This has already been discussed on XDA.
Original dev is for things derived mostly from source, ie kernels and AOSP based roms etc.
Other section is for derivative roms, ie roms that are based on other built orms but had some modifications like apps/themes/fixes etc.
Bottom line, pick any ROM from the first two and you're golden. Steer clear of the i9100G forum.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
thanks for your reply.. now it seems cleared to me..
Hey all,
As some of you have probably noticed by now, we have a new Development section for original works. As explained in the portal article Introducing the Original Development Forums, these forums were found to be very useful in other sections and there has been a lot of requests to add them for more devices.
Please refer to the article for general guidelines on what is and isn't appropriate to post there, and if you have any questions feel free to ask in this thread or to PM any of the moderators about it.
Those using Tapatalk or the XDA app will probably need to refresh the forums list in order to see it. You can do this by going to the base forum view that list all of the different devices and refreshing or by unsubscribing and then resubscribing to this section.
Thank you for addressing our request
Who would I need to bring a list of those original development threads that still remain in the Android Development forum that need to transfer here?
-Neo
EDIT:
The following fall under the guidelines of First for the device/official/or heavily modified original kernel work:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1911297
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2074906
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1659210
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2071043
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2079282
It may take some time to sort through everything, but the best way to let us know is to PM one of us.
edit: Unless I'm missing something the MIUI and AOKP threads aren't even GPL compliant?
xHausx said:
It may take some time to sort through everything, but the best way to let us know is to PM one of us.
edit: Unless I'm missing something the MIUI and AOKP threads aren't even GPL compliant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
Busted!
Added to my signature thanks.
he didnt know where to put it. give him a break
I have moved a large amount of threads over to the Original Dev section. This mainly consisted of cm10/cm9/aokp/kernel threads that were source built. Please PM me or any other mod if you think your thread should be moved as well.
gotta say. you mods rock. thank you for everything you do.
I almost had a heart attack because I couldn't find my CyanogenMod mega threads!
Thought I was going to be banned or something.
xHausx said:
Hey all,
As some of you have probably noticed by now, we have a new Development section for original works. As explained in the portal article Introducing the Original Development Forums, these forums were found to be very useful in other sections and there has been a lot of requests to add them for more devices.
Please refer to the article for general guidelines on what is and isn't appropriate to post there, and if you have any questions feel free to ask in this thread or to PM any of the moderators about it.
Those using Tapatalk or the XDA app will probably need to refresh the forums list in order to see it. You can do this by going to the base forum view that list all of the different devices and refreshing or by unsubscribing and then resubscribing to this section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, this explains a lot. I thought I was going nuts for a sec.
i wish we had a poll asking if we wanted this, iv always been agianst separating dev section, for the same thing, this just alienated and confuses the users.
I tend to agree with siul.
Do you know how much extra work is to have three main folders to check under each device? General / Development (read ROMS that are cool but came from another device) / and Original Development (ROMS that are still based on others work but have been tweaked/setup somewhat uniquely.)
Honest to God, those were my reactions. So I know where siul is coming from...how is MIUI in a different thread than AOKP? If you add a few apps that look different and don't ship with AOKP, is that suddenly original?
Again, not trying to start drama but just my two cents.
EDIT: Just read the whole justification for this. I get it, but still think it's another layer of stuff to sort through.
Bad idea change thing back to the old ways Please
This is bad Mostly for the user who are new i seen the other forum that are like this, not a good i idea doing this plus the developer hate going to one forum to the other just to set thing straight
cflo360 said:
This is bad Mostly for the user who are new i seen the other forum that are like this, not a good i idea doing this plus the developer hate going to one forum to the other just to set thing straight
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am confused too. It may look more obvious and understandable for devs only...
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum
torr310 said:
i am confused too. It may look more obvious and understandable for devs only...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. I am not sure how my CM threads fall into original development.
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum
GrayTheWolf said:
Not really. I am not sure how my CM threads fall into original development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because all are built from source by the person posting them and not a rom modified from someone else's. It falls under the original development guidelines that are posted in the op of this thread.
Sent from my Rezound using xda premium
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum
IAmTheOneTheyCallNeo said:
Because all are built from source by the person posting them and not a rom modified from someone else's. It falls under the original development guidelines that are posted in the op of this thread.
Sent from my Rezound using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh. I see original as something new and completely different.
Whatever.
IAmTheOneTheyCallNeo said:
Because all are built from source by the person posting them and not a rom modified from someone else's. It falls under the original development guidelines that are posted in the op of this thread.
Sent from my Rezound using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see how this works then, because none of my roms are based on someone else's work. and if what you say was true, then all aosp roms compiled from chad's git should be placed on the general dev section instead of the "original dev section" since everyone's aosp rom is based on his work(compiling it docent make it your work). And please understand im just trying to make a point here, no trying to be an ass or anything. i just hate the idea of roms being divided by 2 different dev sections. its just prone to confusion.
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum
siulmagic said:
I don't see how this works then, because none of my roms are based on someone else's work. and if what you say was true, then all aosp roms compiled from chad's git should be placed on the general dev section instead of the "original dev section" since everyone's aosp rom is based on his work(compiling it docent make it your work). And please understand im just trying to make a point here, no trying to be an ass or anything. i just hate the idea of roms being divided by 2 different dev sections. its just prone to confusion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I think. All of the AOSP ROMs built from Chad's git are not original unless chad himself released a ROM.
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum
I think this new thread splt is to confusing. Now I have to check two places. Please revert to back
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum
siulmagic said:
I don't see how this works then, because none of my roms are based on someone else's work. and if what you say was true, then all aosp roms compiled from chad's git should be placed on the general dev section instead of the "original dev section" since everyone's aosp rom is based on his work(compiling it docent make it your work). And please understand im just trying to make a point here, no trying to be an ass or anything. i just hate the idea of roms being divided by 2 different dev sections. its just prone to confusion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't take your response to that effect in any way and no intent to malice received.
"The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:
Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favourite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This plainly states that the self compiled roms belong on the Android Development forum so I side with you in that aspect. However, there is no official or maintainer version of CyanogenMod roms or AOKP thread available so unless Chad uploads his build in this forum as he rightfully could, these builds (from what I understand) can and should be posted here.
Sent from my Rezound using xda premium
Hi lads
Im looking for a good sammy Rom that is clean and debloated with no s3, s4 or note feature ports.
The Rom threads is quite a mess so I can't properly find a Rom
Can you guys suggest me a good stable and longlife Sammy Rom?
Ps. I dont aka for the best etc etc. Just suggestions.
Sent from my Xperia Arc S using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Doesn't matter. Rom recommendation threads are forbidden as well. Read some rom threads & try some roms like everyone else ($100 says mods close this thread soon-ish).
"Recommendation" threads are the same deal as "best rom" threads. Sooner or later, they all snowball into arguments over someone's personal choice and opinions. Hence, we close them down.
If you do want some advice, I suggest you take a look at all the "features" of the rom. Usually, if they have any ported stuff, it'll be explicitly mentioned.
Thread Closed
A.cid
Forum Moderator
-------------------------------------------------------
$100 says mods close this thread soon-ish
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where's my money?