Related
Someone will be able to develop a rom that has the sense 3.5.? I have seen it cooked for HTC Desire.
We believe to see who wants a sense rom 3.5 ...
That would be amazing!
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using XDA App
wrong thread...
Wrong
FaithCry said:
wrong thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not wrong, I am developing a new sense rom with 3.5 and this is where to find out ...
It is not wrong, I am developing a new sense rom with 3.5 and this is where to find out ...
are you ****ing serious? you are annoying and trolling.
You cannot simply port a sense 3.5 ROM (which is actually ugly) to a Phone with a 3D Display. To know that, you don't have to know a lot of development >.>
Flashmaniac said:
are you ****ing serious? you are annoying and trolling.
You cannot simply port a sense 3.5 ROM (which is actually ugly) to a Phone with a 3D Display. To know that, you don't have to know a lot of development >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you.
and its the wrong thread, if you're asking a question it goes in the q&a forum not the development section. once you've ported your rom, THEN you post it in development.
FaithCry said:
thank you.
and its the wrong thread, if you're asking a question it goes in the q&a forum not the development section. once you've ported your rom, THEN you post it in development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK bye, keep you informed
yes if someone is developing it than its the right thread
Sent from my HTC X515m using XDA App
i think porting a rom with native wvga resolution to a device with qHD resolution requires a lot of resizing
and it's not about changing a few values and folders
and I think it will definitly come to our device.
Questions or Problems Should Not Be Posted in the Development Forum
Going to Make a Rom DOES NOT Belong in Development only when it is Developed does it Belong in the Development
Please Post in the Correct Forums
Moving to Q&A
Just curious if this phone will get it's own forum or will it stay under the 3D forum? I figured since it was on HBOOT 1.57 and the older phone has 1.5 or 1.4, there would be some difference in dev work. Just wondering is all. Thanks to everyone here that has answered my questions btw!
newdad23 said:
Just curious if this phone will get it's own forum or will it stay under the 3D forum? I figured since it was on HBOOT 1.57 and the older phone has 1.5 or 1.4, there would be some difference in dev work. Just wondering is all. Thanks to everyone here that has answered my questions btw!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, the cdma ROMs and such will work on the vm version. Having said that, it would be nice to have a separate forum to make answering questions easier. The mix of cdma and gsm in the Q&A forum makes answering questions difficult.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
coal686 said:
As far as I know, the cdma ROMs and such will work on the vm version. Having said that, it would be nice to have a separate forum to make answering questions easier. The mix of cdma and gsm in the Q&A forum makes answering questions difficult.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you coal686. I notice most of these roms are also for Sprint and it confuses people that have VM. It's overwhelming coming from a Motorola Triumph with a few good roms, to all these HTC roms! There's alot of them! Seems MMS is the biggest issue when installing it on the EVO V 4G. I think it's because of a VM way of handling MMS.
Thanks.
I would like to see the EVO V 4G get its own section as well. It's just a footnote in the EVO 3D forum right now and I'm having to do a lot of sifting to find stuff relevant to my device.
I would be interested in a forum as well
im thinking about getting this phone is it worth moving from a samsung galaxy s does it overheat much when heavy gaming the galaxy heats up a bit
I would say it should get it's own subforum. Much to hard to find posts relevant to this phone.
Sent from my HTC Evo V 4G
koopakid08 said:
I would say it should get it's own subforum. Much to hard to find posts relevant to this phone.
Sent from my HTC Evo V 4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, I think as the Evo V community grows we will eventually see our own subforum.
It'd be really nice if they could make one, because I just got this phone, and the mix between relevant and irrelevant info is sorta fustrating.
The Sony Xperia Ion has its own section...what a lemon it's turned out to be.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
coal686 said:
As far as I know, the cdma ROMs and such will work on the vm version. Having said that, it would be nice to have a separate forum to make answering questions easier. The mix of cdma and gsm in the Q&A forum makes answering questions difficult.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest, most people searching for help won't know the difference between GSM and CDMA, which will cause even more wrong section posts.
I don't think the EVO V needs a subforum since it's essentially a CDMA and can run it's ROMs, correct me if I'm wrong.
1+
And not necessarily, everything that works on the 3D doesn't always work on the V 4G... (see mainly, MMS/SMS and data)
hogaburger said:
I would like to see the EVO V 4G get its own section as well. It's just a footnote in the EVO 3D forum right now and I'm having to do a lot of sifting to find stuff relevant to my device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wholeheartedly agree. Bump.
Sent from my HTC Evo V 4G using Tapatalk 2
If not its own forum, at least give it a sub forum thingy. Like how there's a CDMA and a GSM forum.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Datguy_n_Disguy said:
If not its own forum, at least give it a sub forum thingy. Like how there's a CDMA and a GSM forum.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me also; Ditto; Agree; +1
My Evo v 4G arrives today. The community is growing. It may be time for a sub-forum, specific to our device, which clearly has some ownership and interest behind it
a sub-forum ~
Please a sub-forum. Evo V is a strong device and will definitely stick around for a while. It deserves a sub-forum on XDA ~ slight changes between Evo V and Evo 3D make their roms not 100 percent compatible. a sub-forum will definitely increase clarity of information.
Anyone who hasn't already can check out the evo v forum at androidforums.com. Everything is geared towards the VM version.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Hey all,
As some of you have probably noticed by now, we have a new Development section for original works. As explained in the portal article Introducing the Original Development Forums, these forums were found to be very useful in other sections and there has been a lot of requests to add them for more devices.
Please refer to the article for general guidelines on what is and isn't appropriate to post there, and if you have any questions feel free to ask in this thread or to PM any of the moderators about it.
Those using Tapatalk or the XDA app will probably need to refresh the forums list in order to see it. You can do this by going to the base forum view that list all of the different devices and refreshing or by unsubscribing and then resubscribing to this section.
xHausx said:
Hey all,
As some of you have probably noticed by now, we have a new Development section for original works. As explained in the portal article Introducing the Original Development Forums, these forums were found to be very useful in other sections and there has been a lot of requests to add them for more devices.
Please refer to the article for general guidelines on what is and isn't appropriate to post there, and if you have any questions feel free to ask in this thread or to PM any of the moderators about it.
Those using Tapatalk or the XDA app will probably need to refresh the forums list in order to see it. You can do this by going to the base forum view that list all of the different devices and refreshing from there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very cool idea
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I haven't seen this before, but can understand why most would want this. Should make it much easier to find a specific thread. Especially for new comers. Very cool.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
I think this is neat, since I'm only really interested in the original development anyway, because that tends to be more fun.
Very nice. This will be extremely useful for devs.
edit: Hey Haus. Just an idea, but it would be nice to have a Recognized Dev forum with-in each device. One where we can collaborate and figure out mods together and have less chatter from non-devs. But a place where non-devs can still have access to links to mods and such. Just a thought.
Sent from my ClassicJewel
The way I see it is that it creates more place to navigate through to look for roms and other work. I personally do not see the real need for it especially since both sub forums would contain the same kind of information except that one would have original work and the other would not. This could have been done a different way without completely creating a new sub forum that would produce a similar result. For example, the OP post could explain that it's original work or the thread title for all original work would be identified with a prefix of ORG.
At any rate, it seems that others see it useful and probably very helpful for developers. I am not bothered by it! However, I would have preferred things to stay the way they were.
I'm just a little confused as to what defines original development versus non-original. Original meaning not ported from another device? As I browsed through the ROMs in each section I couldn't figure out what differentiated one from the other making it original.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
dsEVOlve said:
I'm just a little confused as to what defines original development versus non-original. Original meaning not ported from another device? As I browsed through the ROMs in each section I couldn't figure out what differentiated one from the other making it original.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The announcement really details the difference.
For example, CM9 development is original because it's new and big and it's something that's being created.
ViperROM, for example, is not original because it is based on HTCs stock ROM.
SoraX64 said:
The announcement really details the difference.
For example, CM9 development is original because it's new and big and it's something that's being created.
ViperROM, for example, is not original because it is based on HTCs stock ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that is what I thought would be the factor at first. Except ViperROM and others based on stock are in the original section while other stock based ROMs are not.
Edit: I re-read the announcement and maybe the difference is more apparent to other devs and not so much to the layperson but still sounds kinda subjective. Doesn't make much difference to me, just curious.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
So....might be a n00b comment and I'm completely blind but I do not see the original development forum on the xda app.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
dsEVOlve said:
Well that is what I thought would be the factor at first. Except ViperROM and others based on stock are in the original section while other stock based ROMs are not.
Edit: I re-read the announcement and maybe the difference is more apparent to other devs and not so much to the layperson but still sounds kinda subjective. Doesn't make much difference to me, just curious.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My apologies, when I checked the original section earlier it was nearly empty and only really had CM9. Looks like they moved a lot more over there.
Leoisright said:
Very nice. This will be extremely useful for devs.
edit: Hey Haus. Just an idea, but it would be nice to have a Recognized Dev forum with-in each device. One where we can collaborate and figure out mods together and have less chatter from non-devs. But a place where non-devs can still have access to links to mods and such. Just a thought.
Sent from my ClassicJewel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a lot of times where someone with a low post count is able to help out a lot so we don't want to limit it too much, but making it so only RDs (and maybe RCs/RTs) can create new threads there may be a good idea. Try running it by them in the RD area to see if it's possible.
dsEVOlve said:
Well that is what I thought would be the factor at first. Except ViperROM and others based on stock are in the original section while other stock based ROMs are not.
Edit: I re-read the announcement and maybe the difference is more apparent to other devs and not so much to the layperson but still sounds kinda subjective. Doesn't make much difference to me, just curious.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately a lot of it is kind of subjective since it's a difficult thing to really define, but for the most part it depends on how significant the changes with the ROM are. It's very much a work in progress still so I apologize if things get bounced around some while it's all being sorted.
Hmm, I'm not sure I like this but it will prolly grow on me.
Issue I have now tho is not being able to see this forum in the xda app..someone else mentioned it as well.
Rippley05 said:
Hmm, I'm not sure I like this but it will prolly grow on me.
Issue I have now tho is not being able to see this forum in the xda app..someone else mentioned it as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As has already been mentioned, all you have to do is un-favorite the forum and then go back through the list and favorite it again.
xHausx, I like your work and appreciate all the explanations you give but I gotta say.. this new section is retarded.
Maybe it was needed in the Samsung forums but we don't need it here. It's just going to confuse a ton of people.
I'm not a dev, so if they like the idea that's great. I just see it as a way for more silly arguments to start. I think that development is development the smallest of ideas is original. Seems like if you're in original then your work is somehow better. I guess we'll see how it works out.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
I think the most annoying part of this feature is having to look in two different places for the same thing and being unsure which forum your favorite rom(s) are located in. The more I use this (both on a desktop and on the phone), the more annoying it is. I don't think the average user care much whether the rom is original or not as long as it works well and do what it is supposed to do.
The idea behind adding this feature is great but its reality is not.
I was excited about the section but it all seems the same as before. Every mod, derivative rom, and other FAQs.
I think it probably would have best been split AOSP core and HTC core if you're going to split it at all, otherwise just leave it the way it was, as messy as it was.
Im not a fan of it either. I find it hard to differentiate between the two. I've read the announcement but I still find myself going into both looking for a specific thread. I think this will just confuse a lot of people but if the devs like it then ok...
Sent from my LTEvo using XDA Premium
I'm a moderator, and I make roms and mods and themes, some of that is "original". I've written some tutorials for original things as well. Honestly I think this is silly. Maybe tag original dev threads or something like the "recognized" program. But differentiating dev threads seems like a lot more headache for devs and users alike. It's like making a new original themes section where the themer drew his images from scratch and wrote new xmls instead of modifying existing images and code. Who's idea was this? I fail to see it's benefit. If it is what it is then cool. But there's already RUU kitchen built roms in the "original" section, and though there may be "original" tweaks to said roms, I don't know that that makes them so. I'd love to have some transparent open discussion about this with users/devs/moderators alike. Thoughts? Counters? Etc?
Hi. I'm new to EVO LTE and I kinda look for this answer but couldn't quite find it. Why is there 2 development for EVO LTE?
I have the original black EVO. Do I use the original EVO development? Or does it matter what I use? Thank you in advance.
Sent from my EVO LTE using xda premium
Original development is for thing like root methods etc., development is for roms and mods based off of stock things.
"We're coming from a pure power source"
There's a sticky at the top of the original development forum that explains everything
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
It's not a dumb question, it's a dumb system. To have these two development sections separated is just plain dumb. A better division would be roms separate from rooting methods or such. But to distinguish between some roms as being original and some not seems to be very inconsistent. This separated development sections started with the Samsung threads and they can keep it. Give us HTC guys back our single development thread.
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
Its supposed to be a way to distinguish ROMS & other projects that have significant original work being done from those that are simply modified stock.
cruise350 said:
It's not a dumb question, it's a dumb system. To have these two development sections separated is just plain dumb. A better division would be roms separate from rooting methods or such. But to distinguish between some roms as being original and some not seems to be very inconsistent. This separated development sections started with the Samsung threads and they can keep it. Give us HTC guys back our single development thread.
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. I guess and its confusing also.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Rxpert said:
Its supposed to be a way to distinguish ROMS & other projects that have significant original work being done from those that are simply modified stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But most of the roms in the original development section are just heavily themed and nothing else. Nothing groundbreaking. If you go with the original intent of the separation of development threads than only CM10 would be in that thread,
There's plenty of original development done in those roms/ect
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Guys, it feels so good to be back to XDA. I was active here back in 2008 during Windows 6.5 days. I'm a little confused here so would like to know what actually is the difference between "AT&T HTC One Android Development" and AT&T HTC One Original Android Development" forum ?
thanks in advance
When I came back from a hiatus I was confused about this as well. From what I can tell Stock Roms and those based on Sense go in the standard development thread, Roms like CM and kernels go to Original thread.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
Deadstyle said:
When I came back from a hiatus I was confused about this as well. From what I can tell Stock Roms and those based on Sense go in the standard development thread, Roms like CM and kernels go to Original thread.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Close, but not exactly. Literally, only "original" work goes in Original forum. This means no rebakes, repacks, slightly altered mods, conglomerate ROMs, etc. Only ROMs and kernels and mods that are truly unique personal original development work... meaning built from source, with your own unique source (linked to GitHub etc) included.
JDAapps said:
Close, but not exactly. Literally, only "original" work goes in Original forum. This means no rebakes, repacks, slightly altered mods, conglomerate ROMs, etc. Only ROMs and kernels and mods that are truly unique personal original development work... meaning built from source, with your own unique source (linked to GitHub etc) included.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ooooooooh. Thanks for clearing that up for me too. I was thinking maybe it was the development section for threads pre/just after device launch or something.