Hello!
I was wondering if anyone here uses CM9 with siyah kerenl 4.1.5, and if it causes any bugs? Just when i had stock ICS with siyah I'd get SOD and I dont want that on CM9. Just i really love the BLN. Thanks in advance
Adarzannh said:
Hello!
I was wondering if anyone here uses CM9 with siyah kerenl 4.1.4, and if it causes any bugs? Just when i had stock ICS with siyah I'd get SOD and I dont want that on CM9. Just i really love the BLN. Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use CM9 with siyah kernel v4.1.5 and see, it will not have any sod's for u
Related
I am using the rootbox 4.1.2 rom on gt-i9100 and I am now on siyah
I wanna change to other kernels but could anyone gimme some suggestions?
Why do you want to change to other kernels? Siyah is a great kernel, with great stability.
I use rootbox 1.8 with dreamkernel 2.7.
So try a version of dreamkernel.
Ok so ive just flashed the siyah kernel on my s3 and just want to know if i install a custom rom will i then lose the siyah or wont it even work?
thanks
DUBS73P said:
Ok so ive just flashed the siyah kernel on my s3 and just want to know if i install a custom rom will i then lose the siyah or wont it even work?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Installing any ROM will install a kernel that comes with that ROM. Many ROMs comes with Siyah kernel either as Aroma Installer option or even as default...
DUBS73P said:
Ok so ive just flashed the siyah kernel on my s3 and just want to know if i install a custom rom will i then lose the siyah or wont it even work?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Yes, siyah kernel will be replaced by the kernel of custom rom, but it is not a problem at all. You can simple flash the siyah kernel again after flash your custom rom.
Cheers,
Rafael
hey... so i was wondering if any of the developers ever modified the stock ICS kernel to run with CM9 because apparently battery drains a lot with CM9 kernel... i've tried the Alliance kernel but its almost the same performer as the stock CM9 kernel...
alinawazkhan said:
hey... so i was wondering if any of the developers ever modified the stock ICS kernel to run with CM9 because apparently battery drains a lot with CM9 kernel... i've tried the Alliance kernel but its almost the same performer as the stock CM9 kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should try fxp releases then.They give very good backup.
I was just wondering whether i should use munjeni's stock rom with oc kernel, or is the cm9 rom by fxp is worth it. Has anyone tried both and if so which gives better performance.
About CM9 and the .54
SteWoody said:
I was just wondering whether i should use munjeni's stock rom with oc kernel, or is the cm9 rom by fxp is worth it. Has anyone tried both and if so which gives better performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my Opinion the Stock ROM ICS: a burden, seems like a just out of the 'beta' rom.
The CM, something is bothering me and I didn't found the thread about the Stock ROM b.54 ... Why do we have to have this ROM instead of the c.10 ??
Seems illogical for me regarding the baseband modem.
So if you find the answer to the b.54, please share it.
About you doubt bet on CM.
Regards.
There is no need for overclocking the cpu. I use CM9.1 on my Go and it runs very nice.
@lvcargnini the .54 ROM updates your modem firmware
keygo said:
There is no need for overclocking the cpu. I use CM9.1 on my Go and it runs very nice.
@lvcargnini the .54 ROM updates your modem firmware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, So it is done.
Running CM9 now, and it is really nice and neat this FXP203, of course this LED bar is annoying me.
I have to ask you guys because i have no idea about kernel....the question is is SIYAH Kernel is compatible in NEATROM full VERSION? I need only to know..please
_followers_ said:
I have to ask you guys because i have no idea about kernel....the question is is SIYAH Kernel is compatible in NEATROM full VERSION? I need only to know..please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If siyah kernel is stock based then it should be compatible. Try to make a backup to be sure and then flash the kernel, else just reflash neatrom
ok thank you for the reply... :good:
wulsic said:
If siyah kernel is stock based then it should be compatible. Try to make a backup to be sure and then flash the kernel, else just reflash neatrom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is a better answer. YES! Use siyah kernel 6 beta5 for neatrom (stock based). However, I'd advise that you should try a different kernel such as the included Apollo kernel since siyah kernel has stopped development and you will have to use dorimanx kernel for a more updated kernel. So I'd use Apollo kernel.