Related
Is it me or does our camcorder suck?? I recorded my dog in the house blinds were open and everything so I can have light in the house but my video still came out dark which is crazy really starting to think our camera is wack I love the phone don't get me wrong but I'm considering trading it in I mean its like I have to be outside to get decent quality....in the daytime anyway
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
You forgot to turn on the camera light.
phatmanxxl said:
You forgot to turn on the camera light.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it was light in my house tho open blinds and everything.....
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Maybe too much light or cam was pointing the bright areas. All cameras will do this. The shutter is taking in all that light.
Rydah805 said:
Maybe too much light or cam was pointing the bright areas. All cameras will do this. The shutter is taking in all that light.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok ill do a couple more test then
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
I'm a professional video producer and hobby photographer. I haven't tested the Evo 3D's camera for video yet, but the problem you described is common in all auto cameras.
When a camera is automatically adjusting exposure, shutter, iso, etc. it adjusts for the brightest dominant subject in frame. The camera thinks you want everything perfectly exposed and is programmed not to blow out the highlights. So, what happens is it sees the bright window and thinks "ok, lets expose to that so it isn't a white blob." If you want to avoid this type of thing, lighting has to be as even as possible to the windows (which is almost always impossible) or you frame your subject without the window in the background. You also avoid this by using manual exposure settings, but I'm not sure how much control you'll have on the E3D.
What I would be weary of is the bitrate the E3D records video at. HD is only a resolution, but if it's a crappy bitrate, the video will look like crap. If you're not familiar with that, search youtube for some sample clips of videos in different bitrates. This probably can't be adjusted in the settings, but might be adjusted with some development if this is lacking. I remember when I was on my Samsung Moment which was android 2.1, that was adjusted in the build.prop but I don't know if that's the same here.
EDIT:
Some examples of what I described -
Bitrate comparrisons:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xNG6gw4cxU
Some background to the above clip, this is testing the Q scale of a hacked firmware for a DSLR. The Q scale is just the piece of the firmware that controls the video compression/bitrate. The lower it is set, the higher the bitrate it uses. He starts at about a 44Mbps bitrate in the above video and moves down to about 10Mbps or lower. I'd be surprised if the E3D records even 2 or 3 Mbps. But if you jump from the beginning to about 1 min 30 sec. you can see the difference more. Watching it through, the changes are so subtle you might not notice much.
Couldn't find a video to demonstrate, but this forum post about the subject might help:
http://forums.cnet.com/7723-7594_102-282799.html
@GK1984 THANKS A LOT your info makes sense even tho imo my EVO 3d camera is kinda wack ....specially in low light
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Chauleyboii said:
@GK1984 THANKS A LOT your info makes sense even tho imo my EVO 3d camera is kinda wack ....specially in low light
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. There's a lot to factor into better low-light picture. The tiny lens on mobile phones doesn't help. The new Mytouch HTC just released this summer has a back-lit sensor which lets more light hit the sensor, for example (the sensor is built backwards so the wiring is behind it - in a nut-shell). It's like a "duh" technology but JUST emerged recently. A lot of cameras compensate by adjusting the ISO (digital equivalent to film speed or sensitivity to light) but that causes more noise/fuzz to appear. You may want to try that though if you can for video, I know you can on photos. But feel free to ask me anything about video or photography and I'll do my best to respond. I don't sign in to XDA often, but I'd be glad to exchange emails or something.
Turn up the exposure, under image adjustments.
Does wonders for me.
Noiro said:
Turn up the exposure, under image adjustments.
Does wonders for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did I mess with all the settings .....stop not satisfied lol .....just think HTC could if done better I know back in the day BAKED SNACK would tweak the camera and camcorder to make it better....just hope eventually the devs will do the same
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
That's the only settings change I would make to get the best results, aside from dancing with a higher ISO... I keep it at max on both the camera & camcorder.
Noiro said:
That's the only settings change I would make to get the best results, aside from dancing with a higher ISO... I keep it at max on both the camera & camcorder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Hey guys I was testing our 1080 p and noticed that our camera was horrible when looking at things with lights like a TV screen or something you really couldn't see anything on there it just looked very bright. It happens when your filming people and there's a light in the background also it just shows up as a huge glare and its horrible. It's on all roms and I think its just the camera in general. My friend also has this phone and I tested it and it resulted in the same thing. Light sources are being shown to much I guess and trust me it's horrible to try and show off your phone and claiming to have one of the best phones in the world and your camera 1080p is filming horribly. It's retarded as hell and up until this discovery I've had no complaints about this phone. So my question is what can we do to fix this. I've tried lowering the EV Control to negative 2 and it still gave the glare. Do we have to wait for an update to fix this problem or what.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
are you on stock or custom rom? i am on unnamed v2.2.1 and having 'continous autofocus' issue during 1080p shooting that makes the video blurry and sticky.i have posted this in unnamed dev forum.
meanwhile, as a workaround i use 720p mode that somehow makes video kinda okay.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
rav4kar said:
are you on stock or custom rom? i am on unnamed v2.2.1 and having 'continous autofocus' issue during 1080p shooting that makes the video blurry and sticky.i have posted this in unnamed dev forum.
meanwhile, as a workaround i use 720p mode that somehow makes video kinda okay.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It happens on both and its horrible. I should be able to use the features I was promised without trouble
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Anybody
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
This problem can not be fixed.
The detector has a limited dynamic range- smaller pixels have lower dynamic range. The lens needs to be small, otherwise the device isn't pocket friendly. Lens size must be matched to pixel size, so even if a manufacturer wanted to include a high dynamic range imager in a cellphone, size-constraints make it unlikely.
It isn't realistic to expect a phone camera to compare in quality to a dedicated (and larger device) camera.
AoN
anneoneamouse said:
This problem can not be fixed.
The detector has a limited dynamic range- smaller pixels have lower dynamic range. The lens needs to be small, otherwise the device isn't pocket friendly. Lens size must be matched to pixel size, so even if a manufacturer wanted to include a high dynamic range imager in a cellphone, size-constraints make it unlikely.
It isn't realistic to expect a phone camera to compare in quality to a dedicated (and larger device) camera.
AoN
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not relevant at all. There are multiple phones that have great cameras such as the Xperia arc. And I expect a device that outperforms others. That's why I bought this phone. And even my old Xperia x10 camera was able to cover white balance a lot better in certain areas. Our camera should be better. It takes great still shots but horrible video in lighted areas I guess. It doesn't make sense.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
If someone could modify the Camera to accept tap to focus and exposure in video mode it would be perfect. That's what the issue is. However, I notice that during recording it is a LOT better than what it is when you just set video mode and look at it.
k1ska said:
If someone could modify the Camera to accept tap to focus and exposure in video mode it would be perfect. That's what the issue is. However, I notice that during recording it is a LOT better than what it is when you just set video mode and look at it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just don't get how we have one of the greatest cameras and it does this bad with white balance. And yes I noticed the recording thing too
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
I've been trying to take still pictures in my C5 ultra and they all turn out overtly grainy to the point that they look like they were taken on some other phone.
Sometimes I need to add flash even to well-lit rooms. I've lowered the ISO and I've tried changing manual settings. The pictures still come out blurry and grainy to some extent.
Is there something I'm doing wrong? This is kind of frustrating, I was expecting the cam to be decent.
Are taking pictures Indoor? Artificial light does that.
If you take pictures under bright sunlight, are the pictures still grainy?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
malih16 said:
Are taking pictures Indoor? Artificial light does that.
If you take pictures under bright sunlight, are the pictures still grainy?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've taken pictures with no artifical light and the pictures are still unfocused and don't look as good as you'd expect. The focus is also really strange and doesn't seem to be working properly.
Pekolachi said:
I've taken pictures with no artifical light and the pictures are still unfocused and don't look as good as you'd expect. The focus is also really strange and doesn't seem to be working properly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you upload a sample of those unfocused pictures?
There's always the possibility you have a bad hardware.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
malih16 said:
Can you upload a sample of those unfocused pictures?
There's always the possibility you have a bad hardware.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://i.pantsu.cat/mvuyaw.JPG
https://i.pantsu.cat/ryphvr.JPG
Took pictures of a figure to illustrate what I meant. The first one was taken with the flashlight turned on. The second one was without flash.
ISO settings were turned down to 100. But I can't seem to get the focus right. I'm coming from an LG G3 and getting this phone to take pictures that look decent (note I'm not expecting perfect photography) has been a pain.
Could be the shutter speed, try Manual mode and select 'Sports' Scene for the fastest Shutter speed, usually works with Flash or Good amount of Sunlight
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Hi I have the note 9 and planning on upgrading to the xperia 1 couple of questions if someone can help
1, am I been crazy thinking of switching is it much of a upgrade
2, is the xperia 1 camera as good as the note 9
3, also is the display as good as the note 9
4, are the stereo speaker as good
Only asking as I haven't tried the xperia 1 but might order it tomorrow I've read there is a few bugs here and there but sony are normally quite good with there updates so can see them getting sorted
Seen alot of youtubers saying the camera isnt all that good and is the xperia 1 a upgrade from the xperia xz premium because I had that phone and loved it
Thanks
I did not own a Note 9 so i will not be able to make a comparison.
About the camera, I like it, but you could not like it like a lot of people. Photos are detailled but noisy. So it dépends if you prefer washed out but clean photo or the grainy feel of a raw photo (with some process still). The app have some limitation, like no HDR when you set the focus manualy. Low light photo are natural and "as you see", not like night mode of other brands that let you see in the dark like in bright daylight. You can do that with the sony too, but the old way, in manual with long exposure and a tripod.
One thing I'm disapointed with is the X2 lens. x2.5 or x3 would have been slightly more usefull, also you can't choose it in manual mode except by pinching to zoom at x2. And also, it's not used in low light condition.
But in overall I was impressed by this phone and kept it after trying P30Pro, Nokia 9 pureview, Oppo Reno 10x Zoom, for me photo are what I'm looking for on a phone, for me P30 is not better for photo (well, if you want a x6 it is of course) but different. I think Samsung is maybe more like the Chinese brand with more color pop and more post processed photo (it's not bad, it's different, I do not make a judgement here). Also, the note 10 is around the corner, maybe wait for the test of this one too.
Hildr said:
I did not own a Note 9 so i will not be able to make a comparison.
About the camera, I like it, but you could not like it like a lot of people. Photos are detailled but noisy. So it dépends if you prefer washed out but clean photo or the grainy feel of a raw photo (with some process still). The app have some limitation, like no HDR when you set the focus manualy. Low light photo are natural and "as you see", not like night mode of other brands that let you see in the dark like in bright daylight. You can do that with the sony too, but the old way, in manual with long exposure and a tripod.
One thing I'm disapointed with is the X2 lens. x2.5 or x3 would have been slightly more usefull, also you can't choose it in manual mode except by pinching to zoom at x2. And also, it's not used in low light condition.
But in overall I was impressed by this phone and kept it after trying P30Pro, Nokia 9 pureview, Oppo Reno 10x Zoom, for me photo are what I'm looking for on a phone, for me P30 is not better for photo (well, if you want a x6 it is of course) but different. I think Samsung is maybe more like the Chinese brand with more color pop and more post processed photo (it's not bad, it's different, I do not make a judgement here). Also, the note 10 is around the corner, maybe wait for the test of this one too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm assuming all the niggly bits with camera can be solved with updates as sony have a good track record with update fixes?
Amoled note 9 it is low end next to the Xperia 1.
Xperia 1 have BEST display market.
Xperia 1 speakers have excellent quality and sound quite loud.
the camera is also better and uses camera technology to track eyes and 10 fps
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
xzpremium1976 said:
Amoled note 9 it is low end next to the Xperia 1.
Xperia 1 have BEST display market.
Xperia 1 speakers have excellent quality and sound quite loud.
the camera is also better and uses camera technology to track eyes and 10 fps
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the display that good compared to the note 9?
Been seeing mixed reviews on youtube about the display and camera
I mainly use my phone for watching YouTube ect
Taking the odd photo
And music
I dont really game ect on a phone
brockyneo said:
Is the display that good compared to the note 9?
Been seeing mixed reviews on youtube about the display and camera
I mainly use my phone for watching YouTube ect
Taking the odd photo
And music
I dont really game ect on a phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://m.ringhk.com/news2a.php?id=18649
Xperia 1 use Sony Bravia Master technology, best TV on the market
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
xzpremium1976 said:
http://m.ringhk.com/news2a.php?id=18649
Xperia 1 use Sony Bravia Master technology, best TV on the market
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks I'll take a look just everyone says the samsung displays are the best (displaymate)
my two cents - from Ex-Note user
1. Sound - Xperia Speaker is definitely more clear and has no distortion
2. Display - Both are good (No notch but both have bezel - In the race for all screen these two are not competing). Note 9 is definitely more brighter but the colors are just too much and over saturated, you can switch to the standard colour profile but still not accurate. Xperia is above average for brightness but the screen colour is just awesome and pleasing.
3. Camera - Both are not the best (But Note 9 has potential for GCAM mod, Xperia till date doesn't - Don't want to jinx it, but it may be a while before we get it either). The camera does have very accurate colors and the 21:9 video profile looks great on cinemapro. The camera basically comes down to your own taste as someone mentioned Samsung has very pleasing artificial colours, Xperia is more true to life and also has the super awesome AF for people photography. But note 9 has the variable aperture on its side
4. Battery again above average really depends on your usage, i do get a days worth battery when i am at work and less when travelling and using the display more (media consumption)
5. The LDAC and other codes are great when connecting to audio devices which use them (I am loving the WH1000MX3). Samsung i believe has only aptX and SBC (for most general Bluetooth cans).
6. S-Pen : something sony can never win, so if it was a part of your daily use, you will definitely miss it, i know i did when i moved from the Note 8 to a iPhone before the Xperia 1.
My colleague has a note 9. So could compare hardware, also i had the note 8, so the difference in usability is something i can comment on.
Hope this helps, overall both are great phones and the SD 845/Exynos and SD 855 - has marginal performance difference in real life use.
brockyneo said:
I'm assuming all the niggly bits with camera can be solved with updates as sony have a good track record with update fixes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like for all phones, anything can be done with updates, the only thing to know is if it's treated as a problem or a feature. Mate 10 Pro I had was really heavy on post process and thus the photo were really not realistic at all. Some liked it, some didn't. There were no update to correct it, even if mate 9 and mate 20 were far better and lighter on the post process.
So it's Always difficult to know if the future will change anything when you don't like something. For example, the fact that hdr/IA is disabled when focus is set by touching the screen where we want, and the fact that you can't disable IA manually without using the touch to focus thing, I cant possibly think they did this without thinking about it. So, it's the result of whole design process that lead to this choice. It's then hard to think they will change the way the app work because they already thought about it. (Luckily since there is a two step photo command button, you can do like with a classic camera to do the focus where you want without touching the screen, but it's not "smartphone user" friendly). Ho, also you can't tap to focus if you enable capture when smile detected.
Well, this long text to say maybe they will change the way it works, maybe not, it's not what we can call a bug.
About the screen, it's nice. I can't say about the samsung's one. A lot of labo test and review seems to say the S10 phone have a slithly better screen. It's true that out of the box the white balance is off on the Xperia 1, but you can change it to your liking. From what I saw in some YouTube video, the smasung panels are less natural and more Poppy colors, but we can't know for sure how the settings are set on both phone. It's like comparing two tv on a mall without having access to the settings to properly calibrate them. My advice here is more to not take what you see on YouTube like the graal. The screen is good and can be well calibrated. Doing comparison between screen is Always difficult without proper Tools, so a normal user will not see a lot of difference f not comparing the two side by side, and even then, the difference can be due only to the settings.
In any case, the Xperia is nice with the WH-1000XM3 bundled for 999€. Only the phone, or the phone and the 60€ cover for this price is really too high without the 350€ headphone bundled in. What I mean here, is that this phone value is more around 700€ than 1000€. It's a great phone I will keep for 2 years or more, but not better than others for the 700€ mark, just different.
---------- Post added at 03:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:03 PM ----------
xzpremium1976 said:
http://m.ringhk.com/news2a.php?id=18649
Xperia 1 use Sony Bravia Master technology, best TV on the market
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The official sony website say (in the disclamer in the Bottom of the specification page):
Xperia 1 does not cover the BT.2020 colour space in full
8 bit display with 2 bit software smoothing
So any review/website that talk about this phone without mentionning it can't be taken that seriously. This one is more like an advertisement taking line by line the specification sheet of the phone.
brockyneo said:
Thanks I'll take a look just everyone says the samsung displays are the best (displaymate)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Display mate is a stupid web paid by samsung.
Reference web are rtings and flatpanel.
This web is best
https://post76.hk/news/2019/06/sony-mobile-xperia-1-calman-test/
Samsung can not compete in quality neither on TV nor on mobile screens against Sony.
Xperia 1 use Rescue technology and converts sdr to hdr etc is technology of the Sony ag9 by af9 BEST TV market .
Samsung on TV makes QLED is a copy of Sony's triluminus and on phones does Amoled pentile poor in subpixels tecnology 8 bits sdr
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
Depend on if u have note maybe u should waited note 10.
xzpremium1976 said:
Display mate is a stupid web paid by samsung.
Reference web are rtings and flatpanel.
This web is best
https://post76.hk/news/2019/06/sony-mobile-xperia-1-calman-test/
Samsung can not compete in quality neither on TV nor on mobile screens against Sony.
Xperia 1 use Rescue technology and converts sdr to hdr etc is technology of the Sony ag9 by af9 BEST TV market .
Samsung on TV makes QLED is a copy of Sony's triluminus and on phones does Amoled pentile poor in subpixels tecnology 8 bits sdr
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phone has just turned up side by side to the note 9 looks nice but very dim unless I'm doing something wrong
xzpremium1976 said:
Display mate is a stupid web paid by samsung.
Reference web are rtings and flatpanel.
This web is best
https://post76.hk/news/2019/06/sony-mobile-xperia-1-calman-test/
Samsung can not compete in quality neither on TV nor on mobile screens against Sony.
Xperia 1 use Rescue technology and converts sdr to hdr etc is technology of the Sony ag9 by af9 BEST TV market .
Samsung on TV makes QLED is a copy of Sony's triluminus and on phones does Amoled pentile poor in subpixels tecnology 8 bits sdr
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the xperia 1 RGB or penitle?
Xz3 display already destroyed the note 9
https://youtu.be/xZjtj-eR8P0
I do not touch Samsung screens with the spen
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
xzpremium1976 said:
Xz3 display already destroyed the note 9
https://youtu.be/xZjtj-eR8P0
I do not touch Samsung screens with the spen
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the xperia 1 display is rgb or penitle? And is the panel 10 bit ect
Thanks
xzpremium1976 said:
Display mate is a stupid web paid by samsung.
Reference web are rtings and flatpanel
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 Would be nice if they did smartphone screen test too.
---------- Post added at 04:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:08 PM ----------
brockyneo said:
So the xperia 1 display is rgb or penitle? And is the panel 10 bit ect
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I quoted the official specification before: not 10bit but 8+2. HDR but not all the BT2020 range.
I can try to find my microscope to look at the screen, because I can't find any review that show the pannel type.
Hildr said:
+1 Would be nice if they did smartphone screen test too.
---------- Post added at 04:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:08 PM ----------
I quoted the official specification before: not 10bit but 8+2. HDR but not all the BT2020 range.
I can try to find my microscope to look at the screen, because I can't find any review that show the pannel type.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah right cheers so the BT2020 isnt true? How can they advertise it has it?
Ya be great to see if its rgb or penitle
brockyneo said:
So the xperia 1 display is rgb or penitle? And is the panel 10 bit ect
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RGB display 8 bits + 2
there are no phones with 10-bit display.
Xperia 1 is 10 bits for software
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 02:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:28 PM ----------
brockyneo said:
Ah right cheers so the BT2020 isnt true? How can they advertise it has it?
Ya be great to see if its rgb or penitle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Next Xperia 5k display And 10 bits
Enviado desde mi G8141 mediante Tapatalk
brockyneo said:
Ah right cheers so the BT2020 isnt true? How can they advertise it has it?
Ya be great to see if its rgb or penitle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From the link provided by @xzpremium1976 the pannel is 67.4% of BT.2020, 99.63% of DCI-P3 and 148.4% of BT.709. That's still pretty neat.
They advertise the ability to play files using this color gamut space I think. A classic SDR screen while just be grey-ish when playing a BT.2020 video (I it's what happen on my computer screen). And they still write down on their specification sheet that's it's not complete range reproduction. But well, untill not so long, screen didn't even reproduce all the RGB color range, and now you have a full DCI-P3 coverage.
Not related to the screen or camera. But I hightly recommend people considering this phone to try it. The 21/9 ratio phone is … unexpedly good in hand. I mean, I really had a hard time with the P30pro with its 19.5:9 ratio coming from a 18.5:9 ratio. But it was more about the curved edge (front and back). Plus a flat screen is less eye catching, but, for me, far better for content, since curved edge distort the image and create ray of light. It's the same with Samsung edge phone. Well, matter of taste here. But really, trying it is important here, I was bluffed, I never expected buying a Sony phone and was just trying it.
Hildr said:
From the link provided by @xzpremium1976 the pannel is 67.4% of BT.2020, 99.63% of DCI-P3 and 148.4% of BT.709. That's still pretty neat.
Not related to the screen or camera. But I hightly recommend people considering this phone to try it. The 21/9 ratio phone is … unexpedly good in hand. I mean, I really had a hard time with the P30pro with its 19.5:9 ratio coming from a 18.5:9 ratio. But it was more about the curved edge (front and back). Plus a flat screen is less eye catching, but, for me, far better for content, since curved edge distort the image and create ray of light. It's the same with Samsung edge phone. Well, matter of taste here. But really, trying it is important here, I was bluffed, I never expected buying a Sony phone and was just trying it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have to have a play around more when I get back home creative mode in display setting makes the display quite dim when going to the other mode it brightens up
I'll try get a microscope and see if its rgb or penitle
Anyone who had both phones could help me?
Enviado de meu Moto Z (2) usando o Tapatalk
Check SomeGadgetGuy on Youtube, he has a lot of videos on both phones and V50 seems like the better overall phone
Xperia 1 no like chuby phones
Enviado desde mi J9110 mediante Tapatalk
LG V50 is a nice phone but Sony Xperia 1 has the simplicity that facilitates the use and gives a feeling of lightness in the interface that satisfies.
The screen and cameras (all 4) I felt better on Xperia.
V50 easy
when you use a Sony oled you no longer want to use another smartphone
Enviado desde mi J9110 mediante Tapatalk
xzpremium1976 said:
when you use a Sony oled you no longer want to use another smartphone
Enviado desde mi J9110 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true, my pixel 4 XL screen is just as good
Mackay53 said:
Not true, my pixel 4 XL screen is just as good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not even close... Principally reds and darker greys.
Sent from my Sony Xperia XZ2!
Luhccas-X10 said:
Not even close... Principally reds and darker greys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got them side by side, it's just as good
Mackay53 said:
I've got them side by side, it's just as good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I gave up on getting Pixel 4XL right after seeing them side by side displaying a video and after seeing a few dozen photos.
You probably got a (Xperia 1) unit that was not well inspected in the quality test, because the difference is remarkable.
From the uniformity to the shades of red and gray (and other colors as well), me and all who were seeing together agreed that the screen on Xperia 1 was far superior.
The quality of Pixel's screen is on 7.5/10, Sony 9.5/10.
Luhccas-X10 said:
I gave up on getting Pixel 4XL right after seeing them side by side displaying a video and after seeing a few dozen photos.
You probably got a (Xperia 1) unit that was not well inspected in the quality test, because the difference is remarkable.
From the uniformity to the shades of red and gray (and other colors as well), me and all who were seeing together agreed that the screen on Xperia 1 was far superior.
The quality of Pixel's screen is on 7.5/10, Sony 9.5/10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm surprised you gave up considering one just on the screen considering software and camera are miles ahead on the pixel
I disagree about the screen but it's just down to opinions at the end of the day. Same could be said about the pixel screen as you could of compared it to one that was not well inspected in the quality test.
Mackay53 said:
I'm surprised you gave up considering one just on the screen considering software and camera are miles ahead on the pixel
I disagree about the screen but it's just down to opinions at the end of the day. Same could be said about the pixel screen as you could of compared it to one that was not well inspected in the quality test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not only the screen! This is the first thing I take into consideration, but there are several other factors that make me prefer the Sony system over pure Android.
And yes, in the end it's all preference.
From the screen to the user experience. (finishing too)
Mackay53 said:
I'm surprised you gave up considering one just on the screen considering software and camera are miles ahead on the pixel
I disagree about the screen but it's just down to opinions at the end of the day. Same could be said about the pixel screen as you could of compared it to one that was not well inspected in the quality test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both phone are very good, they just have different weaknesses and qualities.
If you don't like your Xperia 1, just sell your phone and go troll elsewhere....
nreuge said:
Both phone are very good, they just have different weaknesses and qualities.
If you don't like your Xperia 1, just sell your phone and go troll elsewhere....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trolling for having an opinion? Nah it's more like you trolling cause you can't accept an opinion that goes against the X1
nreuge said:
Both phone are very good, they just have different weaknesses and qualities.
If you don't like your Xperia 1, just sell your phone and go troll elsewhere....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He Is a troll no have Xperia 1
Enviado desde mi J9110 mediante Tapatalk
xzpremium1976 said:
He Is a troll no have Xperia 1
Enviado desde mi J9110 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already proven to you ages ago I had one so get over it.
You're also another one who can't accept others views if it goes against the Xperia 1.
We must respect the friend's opinion.
He did not mock Xperia 1, just exposed his preference without attacking anyone.