I would just want to know how the DNA speaker compares to the iphone 5. I think the 5 has an amazing loud speaker which delivers great full sound and some bass, unlike some tinny HTC ones.
I just want to get a phone that has a good speaker, I don't like the boring iOS. So doed the speaker on the DNA have fuller sound is it louder?
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
I just compared it to my girls i5 and DNA is defenetly better.
She even Greed lol so it's not because I am a DNA fanboy.
Sent from my HTC DROID DNA.
Itzvik said:
I just compared it to my girls i5 and DNA is defenetly better.
She even Greed lol so it's not because I am a DNA fanboy.
Sent from my HTC DROID DNA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you just made my decision on whether to get i5 or DNA lol
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
The DNA has an amp, so that makes it better than the ip5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Bigandrewgold said:
The DNA has an amp, so that makes it better than the ip5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I forgot about this too lol... But I am glad that you made that decision...
Sent from my HTC DROID DNA.
The DNA has a good speaker capable of being quite loud. However, many pre installed notifications and ring tones are rather quiet on my opinion.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
i have to disagree. even with the built in amp, IMO, the ip5 blows this thing out the water.
speaker volume is much louder on the ip5, music output thru headphones is much louder and crisper on the ip5, and bluetooth volume and quality for music is much better with the ip5.
I still chose to get rid of it because I was bored with it, but I tested both side by side for a while before making my final decision. The ip5 is a superior audio device.
to be honest, the speaker in the DNA is amazing. it sounds 50x better than the rezound did, and it's finally got some more bass and low end like the galaxy nexus did.
Success100 said:
i have to disagree. even with the built in amp, IMO, the ip5 blows this thing out the water.
speaker volume is much louder on the ip5, music output thru headphones is much louder and crisper on the ip5, and bluetooth volume and quality for music is much better with the ip5.
I still chose to get rid of it because I was bored with it, but I tested both side by side for a while before making my final decision. The ip5 is a superior audio device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree because I have both phones here and DNA is superior.
Sent from my HTC DROID DNA.
So have you guys tested songs from various genres to conclude ?
So which one is louder?
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
The only audio gripe I have with my DNA is that the sound gets muffled easily since the speaker is on the back. Other than that it sounds great!
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
I have both and the iPhone 5 has a better speaker. Not much louder but just enough to be noticeable.
Sent from my Droid DNA
Personally, I think the DNA has a better speaker after listening to both play the same song side by side. The iphone's speaker just doesn't have the depth of sound that the DNA's does. But whatever, I guess it depends on your personal preference. I really only use the phone speaker for the phone, and earbuds for music, so I'm not too picky.
The only phone that's safe to say has a better speaker than i5 is the Lumia 920, the sound is full and a lot louder.
But Windows phone is really boring.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Itzvik said:
I disagree because I have both phones here and DNA is superior.
Sent from my HTC DROID DNA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you listened to the dna via bluetooth in a car stereo? Or with bluetooth headphones?
Have you plugged up headphones to both? Im not iphone fanboy, I just know Ive had a iPhone 4s and 5, and AUDIO wise, they are superior to the DNA. Im not saying the DNA is bad, it is better than any other HTC device ive had, but even with beats audio, in MY OPINION apple devices hold a clear advantage. I even went and purchased a second hand ipod nano just to make up for the difference because I want apple audio quality but dont want to give up my dna.
Success100 said:
have you listened to the dna via bluetooth in a car stereo? Or with bluetooth headphones?
Have you plugged up headphones to both? Im not iphone fanboy, I just know Ive had a iPhone 4s and 5, and AUDIO wise, they are superior to the DNA. Im not saying the DNA is bad, it is better than any other HTC device ive had, but even with beats audio, in MY OPINION apple devices hold a clear advantage. I even went and purchased a second hand ipod nano just to make up for the difference because I want apple audio quality but dont want to give up my dna.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i've tried bluetooth headphones, but the ones i suck are terrible..those LG earbud ones that a bunch of us got for free that time verizon messed up their site lol..they're awful quality in general, and i don't have any good bluetooth headphones to test with it
Alright I've done some testing of my own and this is what my opinion on the matter is being the audiophile that I am.
Speaker quality goes to the DNA for a few reasons. The iPhone5 has a very crisp speaker but that is quickly lost the louder it gets, this is not the same on the DNA as it's clear throughout the volume level. I feel as though the depth of sound is also better on the DNA (ex: a tom hit sounds like a tom hit on the DNA. Sounds more produced and false on the iPhone5).
Clear winner for Bluetooth headphones goes to the iPhone5 as volume tends to be quieter when using the DNA. Clarity is identical. (Tested using CD-BT603)
Now for the wired headset. Using Bose OE2, bass and treble is a big win for DNA as the sound produced is very big and very clear. Not that the iPhone5 isn't, it's just not as great as the DNA. Middles seemed to be just about the same and couldn't pick a winner.
All and all both of these phones create a great sound, but the winner in my opinion is the DNA. This was also tested with beats off as I have never been a big fan of the sound it produces outside of rap junk and maybe country.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda app-developers app
markalyea2 said:
Alright I've done some testing of my own and this is what my opinion on the matter is being the audiophile that I am.
Speaker quality goes to the DNA for a few reasons. The iPhone5 has a very crisp speaker but that is quickly lost the louder it gets, this is not the same on the DNA as it's clear throughout the volume level. I feel as though the depth of sound is also better on the DNA (ex: a tom hit sounds like a tom hit on the DNA. Sounds more produced and false on the iPhone5).
Clear winner for Bluetooth headphones goes to the iPhone5 as volume tends to be quieter when using the DNA. Clarity is identical. (Tested using CD-BT603)
Now for the wired headset. Using Bose OE2, bass and treble is a big win for DNA as the sound produced is very big and very clear. Not that the iPhone5 isn't, it's just not as great as the DNA. Middles seemed to be just about the same and couldn't pick a winner.
All and all both of these phones create a great sound, but the winner in my opinion is the DNA. This was also tested with beats off as I have never been a big fan of the sound it produces outside of rap junk and maybe country.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am glad that you agree with me
My point is proven again...but honestly the OP needs to do his own research because on this website you will find nothing but people who disagree and always want to prove other people wrong..I personally believe that the DNA is the winner but clearly we have people that think that the IP5 is the best.
So now that you have our opinions...I would do my own research and pick what you like best.
Objectively the iPhone has a higher quality sound, at least through the headphones:
Stats that include iPhone: http://m.gsmarena.com/gsmarena_lab_tests-review-751p4.php
And the DNA: http://m.gsmarena.com/htc_droid_dna-review-853p5.php
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
OK so I just went to the Verizon store with my friend and we compared songs on the speaker of her i5 and the DNA and I have to say the DNA produces some decent lows and mids, it seems to have more bass thanks to the beats amp.
But still iPhone 5 seems just a little louder, there might be an app for the DNA to boost the volume without distortion hopefully
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Related
When I ask how is the sound, I mean how loud is it? I left the EVO 3d for the photon and the photon is A LOT louder when played through the headphones Jack. Where as the EVO 3d seemed as though it wasn't as loud.
I will be buying this phone today but I will need the sound tone as loud as my ipod since this will be my main source for music now that I have Google music set up but the photon is as loud as my ipod if not louder wwhen played through headphones and in my car.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
phyba said:
When I ask how is the sound, I mean how loud is it? I left the EVO 3d for the photon and the photon is A LOT louder when played through the headphones Jack. Where as the EVO 3d seemed as though it wasn't as loud.
I will be buying this phone today but I will need the sound tone as loud as my ipod since this will be my main source for music now that I have Google music set up but the photon is as loud as my ipod if not louder wwhen played through headphones and in my car.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't have a photon so I couldn't compare but with the beats headphones I can barely hear my idiot beagle howl and bark incesantly while I walk him so I'm happy! Also, volume Plus app can always make it louder although I havnt used it yet
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
phyba said:
When I ask how is the sound, I mean how loud is it? I left the EVO 3d for the photon and the photon is A LOT louder when played through the headphones Jack. Where as the EVO 3d seemed as though it wasn't as loud.
I will be buying this phone today but I will need the sound tone as loud as my ipod since this will be my main source for music now that I have Google music set up but the photon is as loud as my ipod if not louder wwhen played through headphones and in my car.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't say much about the sound while using the headphones since I've only done it a few times. It sounded loud enough to me. But I use this as my music player in my car all of the time. I have a fairly decent sound system in my car and can't turn this up all the way because it is so strong. I usually have it a couple of clicks below max, and I still get amazing sound out of it.
WasabiWa83 said:
I can't say much about the sound while using the headphones since I've only done it a few times. It sounded loud enough to me. But I use this as my music player in my car all of the time. I have a fairly decent sound system in my car and can't turn this up all the way because it is so strong. I usually have it a couple of clicks below max, and I still get amazing sound out of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here man, I want this to sound good in my car. 2 kicker L7 12's and 2 old school mtx 801d amps, ima put this phone to the test today lol
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
I can't speak to the phone's performance for car audio but the head phone experience makes this a phone a top contender, in my opinion.
I switched from the EVO 3D, and the difference is laughable when using head phones. People have said the Beats Audio experience is just bass heavy but I've noticed some good clarity in the highs as well.
Only draw back is you'll have to load your audio on the SIM card instead of using streaming services (Spotify, etc.). I don't think Beats currently kicks in with those.
It is much louder than my 3D was.
Sent from my HTC Rezound
Keanen said:
It is much louder than my 3D was.
Sent from my HTC Rezound
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank goodness. The 3d had horrible sound. Through the speaketphone and head set
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Take this as a caveat as I do not own the phone but I've been playing with phones for the last 2 months to figure out which one to buy - yea I over do it
-
The clarity on the razr is a wee bit better; the rezound is a lot louder. The photon is extermely good - maybe better than the razr (hard to tell since i could not compare them side by side) but the photon was better than the epic touch in terms of clarity.
-
The rezound is loud and 'clear' enough for me. With ear buds (I used kilips s2 to test) the rezound was extermely good; as good or better than the razr.
-
The evo-3d was a dog in many ways.
-
If I were you I would do what I did; go by verizon - plug in your earphones and test
-
The photon is a really nice phone (i really wanted an oled display; but I think - about 90% sure) I will go with the rezound over the epic touch, razr or gnexus. Just a trade off of pros/cons across the various phones. The big negative of the rezound for me is the dispaly visiblity outside. It is a lot better than the evo-3d but kind fo sucks comapre to the other phones i listed above.
phyba said:
Same here man, I want this to sound good in my car. 2 kicker L7 12's and 2 old school mtx 801d amps, ima put this phone to the test today lol
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want it to sound really good, make sure you get a good auxiliary cable for it. The best I've found (and I've tested way too many) is Auvio Stereo Audio Cable. A bunch of places have it, like Radio Shack or Best Buy. They're extremely tough (they have a braided wrap around the cord), sound amazing, and have a gold coating to ensure the sound is clear with no interference. They also seem to work with the stock music player using the Beats enhancer. Plus if you download the DSP apk and install it on your phone, you'll have even more ways to push more sound out of this.
WasabiWa83 said:
If you want it to sound really good, make sure you get a good auxiliary cable for it. The best I've found (and I've tested way too many) is Audvio Stereo Audio Cable. A bunch of places have it, like Radio Shack or Best Buy. They're extremely tough (they have a braided wrap around the cord), sound amazing, and have a gold coating to ensure the sound is clear with no interference. They also seem to work with the stock music player using the Beats enhancer. Plus if you download the DSP apk and install it on your phone, you'll have even more ways to push more sound out of this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Save yourself some money (assuming those are expensive) and buy from monoprice http://www.monoprice.com/products/p...=10218&cs_id=1021815&p_id=5598&seq=1&format=2
Keanen said:
Save yourself some money (assuming those are expensive) and buy from monoprice http://www.monoprice.com/products/p...=10218&cs_id=1021815&p_id=5598&seq=1&format=2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for monoprice. Only place to buy cables.
I edited my original post. It's Auvio, not Audvio. But anyway, they're only $15 for those cables. The best I've found and not what I would call expensive.
How does this device compare to the Atrix?
I have the Atrix with Poweramp & Flac files & it's pretty damn good. Just wondered if anyone has comapred the two devices & which is the better?
Cheers
127 Veiws & not one answer.
@home said:
127 Veiws & not one answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have not used Atrix.. but this sounds better than any other smartphone I have owned previously......which includes Nokia, SE, Apple, HTC.....
Using it with Audiotechnica IEs..
dey.santanu2011 said:
Have not used Atrix.. but this sounds better than any other smartphone I have owned previously......which includes Nokia, SE, Apple, HTC.....
Using it with Audiotechnica IEs..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many thanks for the reply.
The sound with a set of Bose in ear head phones is phenominal.
It's not exactly at Galaxy S with Voodoo Sound levels, but it's definitely above average. Just make sure you've turned the sound enhancements off.
I use Ultimate Ears SuperFi 5 IEMs on the go, and the good old Grado SR60i's at home.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Much better than my old sgs2. Tested with both Sennheiser HD555 (high impedance large supra aural) and Ultimate Ears SuperFi 5 (low impedance small iem).
It drive the senn without problem. With sgs2 i need my small fiio amp to obtain good result.
Sent from my XT910 using Tapatalk
Have some Rocketfish BT headphones and use PowerAmp. The sound quality is great.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda premium
I have never heard an ATRIX, but I found that RAZR's sound is pretty good (Ultimate Ears TripleFi 10). As said above, it is nothing like Galaxy S's Wolfson with voodoo sound, but it is AWESOME in comparison to Galaxy SII ****ty Yamaha DAC.
I sold my Galaxy SII specifically due to it's ****ty DAC, build quality and useless GPS. Razr is pretty slow and has a ridiculous screen panel (mine come with 1 dead pixel), but at least it's build quality is a thousand times better than any Samsung's phone. Oh, point to RAZR's GPS, it is insanely fast and powerful.
Well, I hope we get soon a nice ROM that sends all motorola **** to hell and unlocks the RAZR's true power.
Good luck with your RAZR.
"Razr is pretty slow..."
Compared to what? Seems pretty fast to me.
larrygeary said:
"Razr is pretty slow..."
Compared to what? Seems pretty fast to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Compared to the Galaxy S II, yes, it is noticeably slower.
Although I didn't find the S II's GPS useless, the RAZR is better in that regard, and I'd say it's the GLONASS support that does it.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
I didn't even noticed that razr has glonass... And I must say: this russian thing rocks. GSII gps may not be useless, but it is still worse than a lot of other cellphones.
In terms of speed, razr's boot is the thing that is really annoying and makes me sad when I remember GSII extremely fast boot. At least, when everything is loaded up there's no pain in razr usability.
I think that razr's slowness is a bit due to moto**** bloatware, but specially due to worse access speed between RAM and OMAP, when in comparison to GSII RAM and Exynos. I would suggest slower flash memory, but it seems that razr's flash can be even faster in some cases. I haven't any conclusive data to this hypothesis, but based on what I know, seems to be razr's slowness reason.
Well, razr is pretty new in market yet, so there is still hope for us in getting a better software, giving us a faster phone.
Think you've hit the proverbial nail there. Moto make lovely hardware, but the software on the RAZR is rather...odd.
Although if what I've heard is true, the RAZR was rushed to get product on shelves for Christmas, and was intended to ship with ICS - both the hurried gingerbread port from the Bionic/Droid 3 flavour of Blur and the decision to release a 'GSM variant' when both the XT910 & XT912 (appear to) have exactly the same hardware with locked down radios were apparently last minute changes. Or so rumour would have it.
On the Samsung front, the Note has GLONASS support and benefits enormously from it, so that should be the end of their positioning woes going forward.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
@home said:
How does this device compare to the Atrix?
I have the Atrix with Poweramp & Flac files & it's pretty damn good. Just wondered if anyone has comapred the two devices & which is the better?
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What type of sound question is this? Are you wanting to know how it sounds playing music files with the built in speaker? Voice sound quality?
Never used an Atrix but the Razr sounds great. No complaints here
seanmcd72 said:
What type of sound question is this? Are you wanting to know how it sounds playing music files with the built in speaker? Voice sound quality?
Never used an Atrix but the Razr sounds great. No complaints here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am wanting to know how it sounds through a pair of quality earphones with a good music player, preferably play Flac's.
The Atrix is very good but I wanted a larger screen. The razr ticks most boxes but I didn't want to take step backwards in the quality of music reproduction.
Can you shed some light?
just want to share with what I noticed today.was at a local shopping center, saw a stall selling mobile accessories, they have a casing for razr, which they claim improves sound from the tear speaker.I tried it on, honestly utter improves sound quality.
What it does is that it has some tunnels running around on the inside of the casing, enabling the sound waves to propagate to appropriate exit points, resulting in surrounds like sound.. It actually works.. But the price tag its ridiculously high.. So I did not buy it.. anyone else saw this housing? Some weird China brand.. Can't seem to find or on internet.
Sent from my Motorola Razr using XDA App
@home said:
How does this device compare to the Atrix?
I have the Atrix with Poweramp & Flac files & it's pretty damn good. Just wondered if anyone has comapred the two devices & which is the better?
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have Razr, Atrix and Defy and I find they all have very close and decent sound(through jack), unless you use dollar store head phones, you might well be plugging into your butt. Speaker phone and ear piece, another story.
When I first listened to the razr with my Grado SR80i headphones, I was rather disapointed. After that, I found out the phone had some ****ty equalizer turned on for headphones. Once I turned that off, it sounded fine.
drolgnir said:
I have Razr, Atrix and Defy and I find they all have very close and decent sound(through jack), unless you use dollar store head phones, you might well be plugging into your butt. Speaker phone and ear piece, another story.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, but which one has the edge, Atrix or Razr? Which do you prefer to use to listen to on a more regular basis?
Ta
Okay, i cant give the edge to either. Both are about the same volume maxed out and neither has more lows or highs than the other. I just blast my ears for 10 mins doing various hot swaps, and prolonged listening, to one intense orchestral song with some serious tones. This was a side by side, with same headphones, and eq options off using stock motoplayer with both set to volume one notch from full. I am not a bat or dog, but perhaps they could hear the diff.
Sent from my XT910 using XDA App
Everyone knows the One has great sound. Since I don't know anyone who currently owns the One and don't think I can get a real feel in-store, can current owners give me a comparative opinion?
My frames of reference are the Galaxy Note 10.1 stereo speakers and the Nokia N8.
Thanks!
I had the nexus 10, which I think was supposed to have the same speakers as the galaxy note series.
The One's speakers are much fuller in terms of range and soundstage. Highs are higher and lows are deeper.
The only positive aspect of the N10/Note's speakers were that they were front spacing, quality wise they were relatively crappy-sounding.
I'm very pleased with the speakers, I will admit I thought they would be a little louder but the sound quality is impressive. If you disable beats the volume is a little greater Imo. I'd try to find a demo unit and mess with it.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
They're almost obnoxiously loud, but the quality is amazing. I don't want another phone with rear speakers.
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
They won't replace any headsets or speaker docks, but they have brought built in speakers from hideous to surprisingly acceptable. They're magnitudes better than the very very low bar that is the norm.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2
redthunda69 said:
They're almost obnoxiously loud, but the quality is amazing. I don't want another phone with rear speakers.
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed... I have to keep my ringer to half or so in the house because of the volume but I wouldn't have it any other way...
It blows away the Note 10.1, Nexus 10 speakers
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
I had to get a new alarm clock that slowly increases the volume of the alarm over 5 minutes. The standard alarm on the One scared the crap out of me in the morning on two occasions.
I agree with the others. The sound is loud but also clear. My GS3 speaker would get loud but that was only if it was facing away from you or if the sound was reflecting off of something. While it was loud it sounded really distorted. The speakers on the One are loud and don't sound like a teeny tiny cellphone speaker. They sound like decent laptop speakers.
redthunda69 said:
They're almost obnoxiously loud, but the quality is amazing. I don't want another phone with rear speakers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
Is amazing how good and crisp they sound. One of those things that you think is overhyped marketing.....and when you see it in action you don't want to get another phone with rear speaker. Crisp. Clear. If music played has stereo quality it comes out as it should. Obviously, these are small speakers, but for the size it's amazing.
I use my One to play music for my office floor. Rameses b. Not bad stuff. Check him out.
Excellent speakers.
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
I love the speakers, they are loud, but not overbearing, the quality is much better than most others phones I have heard. Im happy I dont have to cup my hand behind the phone anymore just to hear the sound when im watching a youtube video. all in all, I think its the fact that the speakers are in front instead of on the back, it makes for a better user experience IMO.:good:
My 2 year old can finally listen to "wheels on the bus" in stereo quality, praise the Lord!
Sent from my HTC One
hi there, i read somewhere that dna has inbuild beats amplifier, my friend got htc one and really the sound from headphone is just amezing. my question is droid dna have same sound quality and volume level for haedphone like HTC ONE.
mangesh hotkar said:
hi there, i read somewhere that dna has inbuild beats amplifier, my friend got htc one and really the sound from headphone is just amezing. my question is droid dna have same sound quality and volume level for haedphone like HTC ONE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sound quality is a bit of a subjective thing (unless you're an audiophile). Personally, I think the beats eq sucks and introduces a lot of background noise and generally sounds like crap. The amp in the DNA can drive some larger headphones, but I wouldn't say it's stellar. I'm not sure about the DNA/One comparison, but I assume they're similar.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 4 Beta
I have both the DNA running newts sense 5 with zarboz kernel clearly is the best sound combo but in general they have the same 2.5w amp
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2423257,00.asp
This sucks
beats sucks. It adds wayyyyyyyy to much bass.
Poor headphones , poor unnatural sound and the price like senncheiser or shure
China **** from USA thats all
Sent from my HTC One S using xda app-developers app
kveldrud said:
Poor headphones , poor unnatural sound and the price like senncheiser or shure
China **** from USA thats all
Sent from my HTC One S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What..
jbarcus81 said:
What..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is saying that Beats brand sucks. Which I agree with.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
croppz said:
He is saying that Beats brand sucks. Which I agree with.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh absolutely .. Over-priced, over-hyped ..
jbarcus81 said:
Oh absolutely .. Over-priced, over-hyped ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Over priced yes. But they sound good. I mean sound is personal preference , what might sound good to some might not sound good to you.
Beats tech sounds better than Xloud and a few other brands answer to it. I personally like my Sony VR6's to my Beats and they have been around since the 80's
My astro a40 gaming headset sounds better than any beats headphones I've worn. I wouldn't walk around with my a40s in public since they are a tad big but they are good for around the house. Gimme some sennheisers for mobile use and I'm good.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Guess I may be one of the only ones to be sad by this. No this as too much bass to me. I liked the earbuds as well.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Everybody's ears are different.. For me? I need higher 'highs' than the bass because of my ears..
No way?
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I too am sad with this news, I prefer all sound coming from my phone when Beats is turned on. =/
I like the Beats EQ that comes with HTC and some HP devices, but not the headphones. The headphones are WAY overpriced a d overendorced. I like to compare Beats headphones to Air Jordans. They are only so popular because of some famous dudes name on them, when a lower end basketball shoe is just as good. It's a "style" thing.
Like I said, I love the Beats EQ with normal headphones.
Sent from my Ecliptic DNA
Beats audio + beats + hip-hop/rap = orgasm
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
_phoey said:
I like the Beats EQ that comes with HTC and some HP devices, but not the headphones. The headphones are WAY overpriced a d overendorced. I like to compare Beats headphones to Air Jordans. They are only so popular because of some famous dudes name on them, when a lower end basketball shoe is just as good. It's a "style" thing.
Like I said, I love the Beats EQ with normal headphones.
Sent from my Ecliptic DNA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree with you! the regular ibeats sound better than the ibeats with the rezound. i got a pair of monster ntune's and they sound better than the beats. they are overly priced and they did sound good when monster was still with them, but not anymore. like you said the beats eq is all i still want on the phone. my next pair are some beyerdynamic's
I always turn Beats off anyways because my camry has its own eq settings and it produces too much bass and lowering the cars bass just makes it worse. Glad to hear this **** is over.
I just got my DNA last week and I think it sounds better with Beats turned off than the Rezound I had did with Beats turned on. So, for me, it's an upgrade either way. As far as Beats headphones though, I agree that they are overpriced for the small and debatable increase in sound quality that you get. But, then again, I feel the same way about Apple products so maybe I'm the wrong person to ask.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
What beats has is the same thing apple and bose have, good marketing departments. If one were to measure the actual sounds against the likes of sennheiser and shure the differences would become apparent. Don't get me wrong, the sound from beats and bose stuff is not terrible, but it isn't as good as their marketing departments would have you believe. I will not be mourning the split.
Bottom line. Any $60 set of cans from a real manufacture kills every set of beats. This is just a fact I'm sorry.
Yeah bose are the same way but I will say that my overpriced qc15's are one of the most comfy set of cans I ever used. Beats can't even get comfort right. Its a fail across the board for them. Sound is just muddy crap. Comfort is what you expect from a cheap crap set of cans. Build quality is way below sub par. I seen more beats snap in 1/2 and pivots and joins fail then any other set of headphones including the cheap $40 skull candys.
You can charge the same amount per oz as gold for a turd but it Dont make it as good as gold. End of the day its just a over priced turd or as we call it....Beats.
I will defend Bose. They dump more money in r and d then anyone else. Yes they are all over priced but Bose's gets comfort and noise canceling. Those are the two things that make me get a set of Bose. They offer something unlike beats that offers nothing you can't get in a $40 set of skull Candy's
I think the best move for HTC is to get as far away from beats as they can. Everyone knows bests suck and is over priced, over hyped. I would call them the apple of audio but that is a huge insult to Apple as at least apple has some quality and beats just slaps there name on any shiny plastic crap they can get out of China for $20 at cost. Then pay some rapper to put them on. They have to be $400 because they have to pay millions to get some rapper to it them on just to sell them. Without it they would sell nothing.
All beats in HTC phones are is a eq curve. Put a real name on it and do they same and I bet they sell more. HTC needs to get in their life boat and let Beats go down like the sinking ship they are then partner with audio tech. Sen, klipsh, Harmon kardon.
And yes I have used and owned Beats Solo HD and pros. They were returned to the store the fallowing day. Yes sound is all personal pref. But no matter what you can get a cheaper better set of cans that kill beats across the board. Most people Dont even listen to lossless audio files they use super compressed crappy mp3 files so picking up a real set of $500 hi fi cans is pointless as you are limited by your format and it will sound the same on a cheaper $100 set of quality cans.
Beats is nothing more then Dr. Dre's last stand before he is officaly washed out. He is just trying to keep his name out there so in 10 years people are like hmm Dre? Didn't he rap with Easy E?
I think people are missing the point. Isn't it the beats amp in this phone? The speaker and overall sound output with this phone is remarkable even with the beats eq off. Beats headphone are overrated, but what they give our phone is good
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2