Related
theres a guy in NYC who says he can perm root the 3d.
http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/mob/2507015037.html
i think its BS but who knows lol
chef2 said:
theres a guy in NYC who says he can perm root the 3d.
http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/mob/2507015037.html
i think its BS but who knows lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahahahahaha. Sorry couldn't help it. If he could do it he would be on here bragging about how he done it first.
now the voices are in 3d
He may have rooted other devices but I don't believe he has full perm root yet for the evo 3d.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
chef2 said:
theres a guy in NYC who says he can perm root the 3d.
http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/mob/2507015037.html
i think its BS but who knows lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of course its bs!
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Actually I don't see where he states perm root any where. He may just be temp rooting devices
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
He said if he can't do it, he'll let you know. Somebody call him, lol.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Hmm, I never knew overclocking Saved battery life...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
xHausx said:
Hmm, I never knew overclocking Saved battery life...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 and what's this superuser permissions? It let's you install any software apparently. That means I could install windows 7 ultimate and Sony Vegas right?
Lulz
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
haha the guy said it was perm root but didnt know if it was s-off lol....id take it to him and see if it was legit but hes a few thousand miles away lol
I think we all need to call him and make fake appointments haha
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
im a hr from ny. but im already temp perma rooted.lol
lol dont waste your time hehe. I called and he said he can do it. perm root but its $35 for temp root and 65 for perm root ... the old bait and switch...
Rip off!
Sent from my Kyocera Zio M6000 using XDA Premium App
xHausx said:
Hmm, I never knew overclocking Saved battery life...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quick, someone let HTC know that this random Guy who has been rooting phones for 3 whole years has found the mysterious secrets to better battery life!
Their Masters degree holding researchers and developers will be surprised at that one. :eyeroll:
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
xHausx said:
Hmm, I never knew overclocking Saved battery life...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems counter-intuitive, but, I swear that my E4G got better battery life when overclocked. Sure, it wasn't on the performance governer to do that...but I've beared it out many times.
Race to wait man...the sooner a CPU is finished with something the sooner it can get to idle.
edit: the more I think about it I think it's only fair to admit that I only compared stock kernel to havs/UV kernels when oc'd....
Yes the faster it gets to idle... but theres also diminishing returns. The faster you push the processor the more energy it needs to reach that speed.
(Not saying your wrong, never really tried it)
How about undervolting while overclocking?
EVO 3d
aimbdd said:
Yes the faster it gets to idle... but theres also diminishing returns. The faster you push the processor the more energy it needs to reach that speed.
(Not saying your wrong, never really tried it)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1136-1152mHz was perfect....but if I tried 1190 it would drain far faster than usual. most of it burnt up as heat, I felt it. But 1136-1152 was perfect. I tried underclocking for battery gains...it still ran perfectly usable as low as 528 or 548 or whatever it was....but I never got the kind of gains I thought I would, in fact, I never noticed considerable gains in battery life, even that low for a while....
As we all know for some peculiar reason not all smartphones are the same, even of the same make model batch, etc etc etc....so YMMV, a lot, but, OC'd to 1152 running CM7, smart ass governor, (HAV/uv kernel) (with the screen-on lowest freq being whatever was the first above 245...345?) I got far better battery life than stock...once again, not fair compared to mere stock, but, even underclocked I didn't see noticeable returns....
http://sourceforge.net/projects/photon4g.motorola/files/PHOTON-4G/4.5.1A-1_SUN-154/
Time to do work.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
I have never been more happier for any kernel source release than I am right now, this is freakin awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let's show those 3vo guys just how badass this phone really is!!
Time to kick some ass fellas!!
-DJ
Woot woot. And this does have to do with development Now for some undervolting and overclocking!
Sent from my Motorola Photon 4g
Nice!
This is going to be freakin awesome !!!
Holy Crap I am so glad I signed on before bed!
Thats wat up now Motorola can get back to how they were before now they let samsung and htc steal the shine im a moto-guy since droid 1 hell the razor but now its on
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Lets just see what kind overclocks you guys can get. I'm thinking 1.4-1.6
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
I'm more excited about battery savings from underclocking
brianez21 said:
I'm more excited about battery savings from underclocking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good I underclock my nexus or run oxygen rom if Im going to have a busy day out where I won't be near a charger but everybody knows the real competition comes from the overclock and test scores
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Think I've seen the asus transformer to 1.5 ghz. Thats tegra 2 also.
Sent from my Motorola Photon 4g
I'm more interested in undervolting, and other tweaks, in order to keep performance at same clock speed.
However, once in Webtop mode, I'll take any overclocking and nitro my phone can withstand for relatively longer, continuous sessions.
Before we bust a nut, is it confirmed the package includes kernel source ?
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
I continually ran my Epic at 1.4ghz, with little to no snags, so if we can't get at least 1.5ghz, this phone goes back to Sprint!!!
Nerorising said:
I continually ran my Epic at 1.4ghz, with little to no snags, so if we can't get at least 1.5ghz, this phone goes back to Sprint!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My nexus is at 1.4 steady min and Max. Lol I want pure performance. I'm hitting 3800 quadrant 34 mflops
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Nerorising said:
I continually ran my Epic at 1.4ghz, with little to no snags, so if we can't get at least 1.5ghz, this phone goes back to Sprint!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure it can
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
My Iconia tab has the same processor and can overclock to 1,646,000. I run it at 1,400,000 and it's completely stable.
beartrap said:
My Iconia tab has the same processor and can overclock to 1,646,000. I run it at 1,400,000 and it's completely stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So its safe to say it should 99.9% sure hit at least 1.6 ghz not bad, not bad at all
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Jorge330823 said:
So its safe to say it should 99.9% sure hit at least 1.6 ghz not bad, not bad at all
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But isn't the ATRIX a tegra 2? They have yet to get it stable at 1.2 ghz from what I can see. But I see the XOOM at 1.5....strange
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
phyba said:
But isn't the ATRIX a tegra 2? They have yet to get it stable at 1.2 ghz from what I can see. But I see the XOOM at 1.5....strange
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that dude a post up from mine had his at 1.4 stable. I think its just an atrix issue. Not the processor.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Jorge330823 said:
And that dude a post up from mine had his at 1.4 stable. I think its just an atrix issue. Not the processor.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea. Its just weird because the g2x is at 1.5 as well. I wonder if its safe to say that the photon will be able to match it
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
I used to be getting 3200-3600 on my gs 2 but ever since I flashed unnamed 1.3 and icscrewed 1.1 I've been getting score ranging from 2800-3200
Is this suppose to happen?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
The numbers mean absolutely nothing as far as how the phone runs. If they go up or down doesn't mean anything unless you like showing off your epeen....
Benchmarks don't mean that much (except large differences 1000+). How quick does the phone respond? Does it feel fast? If so great. If not, keep working.
Sent from my páhhōniē
I see.
I'm not a least bit regret about flashing unnamed because my phone is ridiculously fast right now.
I guess quadrant score really doesn't mean anything lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
honghsien5 said:
I used to be getting 3200-3600 on my gs 2 but ever since I flashed unnamed 1.3 and icscrewed 1.1 I've been getting score ranging from 2800-3200
Is this suppose to happen?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really? you should be getting around 9,999,999 if you're using quadrant. thats about how accurate that app is. its a worthless piece of junk that you shouldn't use to measure the speed of your device dude. just use your phone and weight it out from real-world user experience.
Post your Quadrant scores. I got my stock EVO LTE as high as 5,278. What's yours?
Antebios said:
Post your Quadrant scores. I got my stock EVO LTE as high as 5,278. What's yours?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got my stock EVO as high as 5,278 too
Just did this one but I've gotten over 5200 in the past.
Sent from my EVO LTE!!
I mostly get around 5100, but this was my best.
I use Antutu for bench mark... I like that it gives sd read and write speeds
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
It took running quadrant about 6 times but I finally got it above 5200 typically I get about 5000
Sent from my EVO using XDA
it might be just me but it looks like our scores are mostly memory and io Our CPU seems worse than the one x, any idea why?
Sent from my EVO using XDA
Here's my AnTuTu screenshot. I got a score of 6891.
Hey, I only got 4867. What gives?
Sent from my EVO LTE using XDA
sslbaron said:
Hey, I only got 4867. What gives?
Sent from my EVO LTE using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't worry about it. I was able to get in the 7000s with my evo 3d and my Rezound with oc kernels and that is with the s3. Antutu can be a little buggy
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
I'm using viperROM. Got 5782 on Quadrant. CPU scores higher with viperROM, very close to the HTC One X.
Stock
from my LTEvo that will not have 4G coverage utill after I buy my next phone ......
I ran my fully stock phone once and got a 4800 flat. I was BLOWN away at the difference in graphics compared to my OG EVO.
Not to shabby?
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA
People put way too much merit into benchmarks. Does your phone run smoothly and allow you to multi task everything you need to? If so, I think your phone is passing the human benchmark.
Sent from my Evo 4G LTE using Tapatalk
These benchmarks don't mean anything. The true benchmarks that matter are the ones the TRULY test the hardware.
Brought To You By TapTalk 2 Via LTevo
Yeah I didn't get a good score in cm9 I guess thats the one more accurate and sense 4.0 blows them up.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE
However in CM9 all the games run perfectly. GTA3 runs way better in cm9 and temple run is very very smooth.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Quadrant may be good for bragging rights but it does little in terms of actual benchmarking....
Sent from LTEvo using XDA Premium
I saw this in Reddit today and thought I'd post it to the EVO forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1987032
Yes i saw this on reddit too, have you tried it out yet?
I tried it out, there is actually a speed boost. Although I think my battery suffered a bit.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
nice find! i need to start checking out other threads/sections on xda.. i always just stay in what ever phone i have at the time thread.. there's alot of other cool issh goin on else where :good:
I too saw that on Reddit. I tried it out on my Evo running Stock w/ Goodies, and on my Nexus 7. Installed, rebooted, and played a bit to let things "settle in", and there is definitely a noticeable improvement in speed and responsiveness, on what were already pretty swift and smooth devices.
I haven't tried it yet, but will soon. If this works out in the long run, hopefully the devs can put this in their roms. I wonder if Google knows about this...
Anyone do a quadrant on this yet? I'm curious if it really works or its just a placebo. Also, how is battery life?
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Haven't looked much into this but improvements of this nature usually have a decent drawback.... Ie battery life...
interested in some results though if anyone does it
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
I'm using it and it seems good
6000 is without 6200 is with
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I've done it. Its hard to tell given this was already fast but I haven't lagged, benchmarks up a few hundred.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Overclocked at 1.8 with it off
Overclocked at 1.8 with it on
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Interesting, probably works similar to linaro. Looking forward to what our dev's say about it...
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Directions seem to be hard to come by in that thread... I installed the apk in it, and also flashed a zip file that was referenced in one of the last pages. Doesn't seem to make a bit of difference... As a reference, though, I benchmarked a 6700 on basically stock JellyBean a few weeks back. Still have the screen shot from it saved.
tyler.durden said:
Directions seem to be hard to come by in that thread... I installed the apk in it, and also flashed a zip file that was referenced in one of the last pages. Doesn't seem to make a bit of difference... As a reference, though, I benchmarked a 6700 on basically stock JellyBean a few weeks back. Still have the screen shot from it saved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you need is the .apk, toggle, check & reboot.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Come on guys, running a benchmark to see if it works is a total waste of time. I can run the same benchmark 10 different times and get10 totally different scores without applying any mods at all.
themuffinman said:
Come on guys, running a benchmark to see if it works is a total waste of time. I can run the same benchmark 10 different times and get10 totally different scores without applying any mods at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know someone asked for them so I did them
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
themuffinman said:
Come on guys, running a benchmark to see if it works is a total waste of time. I can run the same benchmark 10 different times and get10 totally different scores without applying any mods at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is better:
Enter this in a terminal to see if its working.
watch -n 1 cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
3000+ & its doing its job. (Per that thread)
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
tried it on my Sony S, doesn't really appear to do anything... then agian I wasn't having lag issues...
Also, this shouldn't affect quadrant... just random lags
Cyanogenmod himself posted in that thread saying that there is something going on, but he doesn't know what exactly it is... However there is a mild speedup according to him. He just doesn't know why
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Art2Fly said:
Cyanogenmod himself posted in that thread saying that there is something going on, but he doesn't know what exactly it is... However there is a mild speedup according to him. He just doesn't know why
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what little I know about entropy pools, the larger this pool (a pool of random actions right?) is & the faster your programs/inputs are able to access it. The more responsive they'll be.
I could be very wrong but this is what I assume is happening here.
This pool that continusly dumps & fills for however many seconds is about 300-400 nomally on our device. With the tweak the pool is 3000+, I think the tweak also increases the speed of the refresh to access the pool by 1 second.
So 1 second (every second this -> 4 digit figure randomly fills & dumps) + 3000+ accessable random numbers (actions) vs. undetermined number of seconds & a pool avg or 300-400.
Again I'm guessing. I haven't spoke of this since my Eee PC & that might've been for a kernal.
I imagine it as a hand/s repeatedly reaching for a few hundered chocolates spinning in a whirlwind (before) & a ton of random chocolates with even faster hands reaching for a few thousand chocolates spinning in the whilrwind (after).