Hi there. I recently bought a second hand atrix which has been used for 6 months.It seems clean from outside and seems to work fine. But transitions in the desktop seems not smooth enough.So I decided to do a benchmark and get an idea about its performance.I think the results are not what it is supposed to be. But I want your help to identify it better.Phone is using 2.3.4. Its original ROM i think. If you could help me if the results are normal or not I would be very glad. Because i still have time to send the telephone back to its former owner.
First I used quadrant and the results are : Total 2093 , CPU: 2567, Mem:2683, I/O: 2874, 2d:267, 3d:2075
ANTUTU : Total Score : 5152, CPU : 1449, RAM:938, GPU:2163, I/O:602
ErayErdogan said:
Hi there. I recently bought a second hand atrix which has been used for 6 months.It seems clean from outside and seems to work fine. But transitions in the desktop seems not smooth enough.So I decided to do a benchmark and get an idea about its performance.I think the results are not what it is supposed to be. But I want your help to identify it better.Phone is using 2.3.4. Its original ROM i think. If you could help me if the results are normal or not I would be very glad. Because i still have time to send the telephone back to its former owner.
First I used quadrant and the results are : Total 2093 , CPU: 2567, Mem:2683, I/O: 2874, 2d:267, 3d:2075
ANTUTU : Total Score : 5152, CPU : 1449, RAM:938, GPU:2163, I/O:602
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, I've never cared much about benchmarking, but I thought I'd give it a whirl for kicks and to help.
I ran Quadrant, and here's my results:
Code:
Total: 3136 | Mem: 3315 | I/O 7376 | 2D 501 | 3D 2013
Now, I am not running a stock ROM, and I'm overclocked to 1.3Ghz. Both of those could have a huge impact on performance. It's been a while since I've seen my stock ROM, but I remember seeing a huge performance difference the first time I flashed CM7 on it, which is what I'm running now.
twomoses said:
So, I've never cared much about benchmarking, but I thought I'd give it a whirl for kicks and to help.
I ran Quadrant, and here's my results:
Code:
Total: 3136 | Mem: 3315 | I/O 7376 | 2D 501 | 3D 2013
Now, I am not running a stock ROM, and I'm overclocked to 1.3Ghz. Both of those could have a huge impact on performance. It's been a while since I've seen my stock ROM, but I remember seeing a huge performance difference the first time I flashed CM7 on it, which is what I'm running now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you a lot for helping here out. And I'm also waiting for other members to help me out.
Related
Well, its just two since since i started playing around geekily with my Galaxy Tab P7500, 16 GB. I downloaded Antutu Benchmark and got an expected score, but then I checked their leaderboard, I found that my rank is quite less than the people who own the same device. Their scores are in 7000s, while mine is like 6800 neighbourhood.
Is their a way that I can improve the benchmark to that level? By the way, I overclocked it to 1400Mhz using pershoot's kernel and Antutu CPU Master and also modified my sdcard read cache to 4096. I tried googling but dint find any methods. Plus, I also need to improve my GPU performance, just in case.
techie.anish said:
Well, its just two since since i started playing around geekily with my Galaxy Tab P7500, 16 GB. I downloaded Antutu Benchmark and got an expected score, but then I checked their leaderboard, I found that my rank is quite less than the people who own the same device. Their scores are in 7000s, while mine is like 6800 neighbourhood.
Is their a way that I can improve the benchmark to that level? By the way, I overclocked it to 1400Mhz using pershoot's kernel and Antutu CPU Master and also modified my sdcard read cache to 4096. I tried googling but dint find any methods. Plus, I also need to improve my GPU performance, just in case.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
while taking benchmarks, apart from overclocking to 1.4GHz, you need to ensure that you have the governor set to 'performance' or 'lazy' in setcpu. you also need to kill all background applications that are current running, settings->applications->manage applications->running->kill. this ensures that you get the maximum possible benchmark.
also try RieGo's kernel. its got experimental GPU overclocking
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328023
ohk, well, those good benchmark guidelines were followed by me. Anyways, thanks for reply. I need to try that kernel you've advised.
techie.anish said:
ohk, well, those good benchmark guidelines were followed by me. Anyways, thanks for reply. I need to try that kernel you've advised.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Riego's GPU OC kernel is not working .. i think pershoot tried it before already .. he took it out because it doesnt make any difference.
anyone tried benchmarks on honeycomb...? please share some results.... that will help all decide to update to HC or not on performance grounds....
thnx
Which benchmarks. Will depend if user is running a rom
mcord11758 said:
Which benchmarks. Will depend if user is running a rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
general ones quadrant, linpack ,pi ,antutu , browsermark and others... i was asking about official rom HC 3.2.1
benchmark
I ran the Quadrant app. dont know much about it, guess I did it correctly- I ran the full benchmark and my device scored 2096. I've ran it 3 times, each time it scores between 1900-2000 range. my device is a stock View 4G upgraded to Honeycomb through system updates. I updated over wifi, I don't have a sprint data plan. hope this helps-
Quadrant is same as it was on GB interesting!!! 3D n 2D benchmark scores on GB were quite low... i guess honeycomb wont affect these thing these r mainly depend on GPU n processor...
there will b just marginal difference...
With Nenemark2 i get 23-25 fps on Honeycomb
GB it was around 12-14 fps
Vellamo between 850-1100 - dont remember GB results
I would ask you not to mention specific ROMs
When the HD2 came out, the first months it was all about benchmark results...
There were ROM ranking lists based on benchmarks... but the comunity realized fast this was pure bull**** so it stopped after a while
Cooks optimized only for specfic benchmarks to get on top casue people started looking only at results... which often had nothin to do wit real life performance
Flyer.michael said:
With Nenemark2 i get 23-25 fps on Honeycomb
GB it was around 12-14 fps
Vellamo between 850-1100 - dont remember GB results
I would ask you not to mention specific ROMs
When the HD2 came out, the first months it was all about benchmark results...
There were ROM ranking lists based on benchmarks... but the comunity realized fast this was pure bull**** so it stopped after a while
Cooks optimized only for specfic benchmarks to get on top casue people started looking only at results... which often had nothin to do wit real life performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
after reading thing i might move to honeycomb .... so we get improved graphics perfomance.....
and vellamo was 820 on GB...
so flyer was under powered with GB...
i heard 1.5 ghz processor was also under powered so i guess bechmark pi will also give better result...
thanx man please test some more on HC... antutu gave a bad score with GB
Hi guys, can someone tell me how to get my P500 perform fastest it can? What ROM is fastest, and i don't care about battery, just want it to be the fastest it can! And also what aditional tweeks and programs/kernels to instal to make it faster?
In this moment i am using mic_os 6.5.7 android 2.3.5 CPU 825/245 Mhz Performance, with only settings, LG keyboard and setCPU running apps using 83MB of RAM alltogether, highest score i got is 1317 points, and about 1250 average.
Is this the fastest this phone can go...? :/ I have seen some posts where some guys got it too like 1500! That is my magic target number! Soo, any help..?
Echelonex said:
Hi guys, can someone tell me how to get my P500 perform fastest it can? What ROM is fastest, and i don't care about battery, just want it to be the fastest it can! And also what aditional tweeks and programs/kernels to instal to make it faster?
In this moment i am using mic_os 6.5.7 android 2.3.5 CPU 825/245 Mhz Performance, with only settings, LG keyboard and setCPU running apps using 83MB of RAM alltogether, highest score i got is 1317 points, and about 1250 average.
Is this the fastest this phone can go...? :/ I have seen some posts where some guys got it too like 1500! That is my magic target number! Soo, any help..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oxygen rom + franko's v4 kernel.
Try using chainfire 3d from market
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Echelonex said:
Hi guys, can someone tell me how to get my P500 perform fastest it can? What ROM is fastest, and i don't care about battery, just want it to be the fastest it can! And also what aditional tweeks and programs/kernels to instal to make it faster?
In this moment i am using mic_os 6.5.7 android 2.3.5 CPU 825/245 Mhz Performance, with only settings, LG keyboard and setCPU running apps using 83MB of RAM alltogether, highest score i got is 1317 points, and about 1250 average.
Is this the fastest this phone can go...? :/ I have seen some posts where some guys got it too like 1500! That is my magic target number! Soo, any help..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use oxygen 2.3.2 and this tweaks below
see this threads...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1530411
Echelonex said:
Hi guys, can someone tell me how to get my P500 perform fastest it can? What ROM is fastest, and i don't care about battery, just want it to be the fastest it can! And also what aditional tweeks and programs/kernels to instal to make it faster?
In this moment i am using mic_os 6.5.7 android 2.3.5 CPU 825/245 Mhz Performance, with only settings, LG keyboard and setCPU running apps using 83MB of RAM alltogether, highest score i got is 1317 points, and about 1250 average.
Is this the fastest this phone can go...? :/ I have seen some posts where some guys got it too like 1500! That is my magic target number! Soo, any help..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting 1800 score in quadrant
NightlyFourE + Franco.K #4 + Ungaze data2sd
Try popdog123 oxygen 2.6 with Franco #4. 825/480 performance/sio.
Add ungaze data2sd with 1gb ext4 and p500 will not run fast. It will FLY SLOW.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA
try this : see my signature there the neocore result, and the rom name too
Use cyanogenmod nightly @ 787MHz + PERFORMANCE Governer
Thx guys for replies, i will test these combinations one by one and post results here...
Also will test new ICS beta4.
This is what i came up with till now, will update it soon! If you have any more suggestions, please tell me...
I also tried to play HVGA (with sound) version of GTA 3 on all ROMS exept ICS and i must say that the Perfectpeso2.2 was frikin fastest, still lags pretty much on GTA 3 but playable. too bad in this one is clock cap at 806 mhz...:/
And i am pretty dissapointed in ICS results, cuz it is soo nice looking and fresh but damn slow...:/
i didn't use Ungaze cuz it just makes files between phone and SD card move more faster, right? Soo i don't think it will improve gaming speed...
i will put an ICS to my phone to test it for few days and see if it is nice, but after that, i am definately going on Perfectpeso! At least ps1, and Mame 32 games will run smooth now!
And if anyone knows a way to play full HVGA version of GTA3 on P500 please reply! But i think that ripped version will now run smooth! (the one with lower graphics and no sound)
Results: I choose the best results i got from these tests...and exept ICS there is a little difference in power between these ROM's as you can see in benchmarks:
1.NightlyFourE + Franco.K #4
825Mhz
a few runs
Quadrant standard - around 1300
3 runs
Neocore - 62
2. Perfectpeso2.2
806Mhz
3 runs
Quadrant Standard - 1336
3 runs
Neocore 806Mhz - 70.8
3.CM 9 Ics Beta 4
806Mhz
3 runs
Quadrant Standard - 946
4.oxygen 2.3.2
806Mhz
3 runs
quadrant standard - 1307
3 runs
neocore - 63.1
Hey everybody! I love my Mini Pro but it seems to be running really slow lately. I notice it gets hot sometimes (especially when tethering) and I'm starting to wonder if the heat has damaged my phone and slowed it down...
Using AnTuTu Benchmark Free (v2.9) I get a score of 2918
Using Quadrant Standard Free (v2.1.1) I get a score of 1313
So how does your Mini Pro compare?
I'm still on Gingerbread (no ICS for me yet) and the benchmark apps are saved in the phone memory (not on the memory card)
It seems to be running slower. My Scores (Stock Gingerbread):
AnTuTu Benchmark 2.9 - 3265
Quadrant Standard - 1497
Do you have a lot of apps? Where they running while you run the benchmarks?
my scores :
Using AnTuTu Benchmark Free v2.9 - 4008
ROM : real ICS r5.2
kernel : boot mango lite v3
overclocked to 1,5 GHz
Real ICS 5.2 on MESA 1. 4 kernel scores 3200 on antutu.
Real ICS on xtended kernel scores 2700
No overclock.
Sent from my ST15i
Hi
Before going into benchmarking, do you see something wrong in logs (read them with catlog app), things like as many errors?
Did you ckeck for running apps that could eat cpu, produce heat, and slow the device?
Ending all apps that are eating cpu!
Antutu:
Total Score: 3118 (2/5 Stars)
CPU: 1041
GPU: 1279
RAM: 364
I/O: 434
Quadrant Standard:
Total Score: 1360
CPU: 1873
MEM: 1446
I/O: 851
2D: 1042
3D: 1587
xperia mini pro, rooted, stock gingerbread 2.3.4 (4.0.2.A.0.69) on stock Kernel
No overclocking, everything stock
U R ALL NOOBS !!!!:silly:
Xperia mini pro with krsh kernel and stock 4.0.4 rom : 4689 !!
only with 1.4 GHz overclock...
Ouch ! Should I worry with scores of 2984 (AnTutu) and 1239 (Quadrant) ?
Running FXP130 (kernel and CM9) without any overclock.
Ghuntar WALDMEISTER said:
Ouch ! Should I worry with scores of 2984 (AnTutu) and 1239 (Quadrant) ?
Running FXP130 (kernel and CM9) without any overclock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes u should !!!
i got the score : 3992 with cm9 kernel fxp 130 (no overclock)...
Ok, now I'm worried... Where should I check first ?
- I already checked the logs (with aLogcat), and did not found too many errors (Something about AudioHardwareMSM)
- I looked at the processor business (very approximate translation (found in developers options)), but I fear I'm not the best at reading the result. Is this like the top command in linux (with the CPU load for 1, 5, 15 minutes) ?
- Lastly I took a look at the battery usage. Nothing incredible here, but could have gave a hint...
Oh I forgot : I'm using the interactive governor.
Outlaw13 said:
yes u should !!!
i got the score : 3992 with cm9 kernel fxp 130 (no overclock)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you can get almost 4k without overclock.
Chefry22 said:
I don't think you can get almost 4k without overclock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well... I'm the ONE who did !! :good:
---------- Post added at 11:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:24 AM ----------
Ghuntar WALDMEISTER said:
Oh I forgot : I'm using the interactive governor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ur governor is the problem... put it on performance:good:......... and must say im using class 10 sd card... My phone is very good at benchmark!! it always gets higher than my friends with the same phone
Outlaw13 said:
ur governor is the problem... put it on performance:good:......... and must say im using class 10 sd card... My phone is very good at benchmark!! it always gets higher than my friends with the same phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about battery life ?
Well, I'm going to test, but what I need is a mobile/wireless phone .
Oh, and one more thing : I did not kill any app. Just rebooted the phone before testing : I want to know what my phone can do with all I need activated.
OK, I see a lot of ppl are worried cuz of their score....
That's BS if you ask me. What counts is you experience with the phone. Is it fluid, fast, responsive etc.
Say if you have a scoreof 4K, but the phones is sluggish. What's the point with these opsessive benchmarks then.
It's nice to know your score, but it does not mean that your phone is better than a phone with lower score.
One time, after I applied some tweaks my score dropped from 3K to 2700. And I don't care cuz the phone was faster. Regardless of the score.
TL,DR:
Take your scores as a reference only. Your phone can be fast and responsive even with a 2700 score.
Benchmarks are stress tests. It does not measure user experience
daaabs said:
Hey everybody! I love my Mini Pro but it seems to be running really slow lately. I notice it gets hot sometimes (especially when tethering) and I'm starting to wonder if the heat has damaged my phone and slowed it down...
Using AnTuTu Benchmark Free (v2.9) I get a score of 2918
Using Quadrant Standard Free (v2.1.1) I get a score of 1313
So how does your Mini Pro compare?
I'm still on Gingerbread (no ICS for me yet) and the benchmark apps are saved in the phone memory (not on the memory card)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer to ur problem is : download a stock rom and flash it...(with flashtool of course)...U'll be fine... :good::good:
OR if have recovery installed : do a factory reset and wipe user data and dalvik cache (instead of flashing)
---------- Post added at 06:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:59 PM ----------
Ghuntar WALDMEISTER said:
What about battery life ?
Well, I'm going to test, but what I need is a mobile/wireless phone .
Oh, and one more thing : I did not kill any app. Just rebooted the phone before testing : I want to know what my phone can do with all I need activated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
putting it on PERFORMANCE or ONDEMAND will do it...
5k
Chefry22 said:
I don't think you can get almost 4k without overclock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have 5900 antutu without overclock and cyanogenmod 9.1
I got
antutu : 5850 ..(1.4ghz)
My result is: 9400 on antutu oc 1.6Gh
SK17i AnTuTu 3.0.2
Му Result - 5478
benchamrk
i get 6427 stock ics rage kernel supercharged 1.21 ghz
---------- Post added at 06:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:44 PM ----------
wujek22 said:
My result is: 9400 on antutu oc 1.6Gh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you get so much high score??????
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
com975 said:
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what abou AOKP rom ?
AOKP bricks my phone.
Installed slimbean after this, its really good and antutu is 4100 but i ram is the same as cyanogen
com975 said:
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did it too before but I have tested rooted official firmwares and V20D was the best, and not Slim Bean.
V20D gives me 100mb. It's not better then SlimBean for me.
com975 said:
V20D gives me 100mb. It's not better then SlimBean for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
caiejay said:
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excatly
caiejay said:
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. But for me, SlimBean is better. But I am using V10K now. More Ram and better benchmarks.
v10k is best rom so far for our device. Im heavy user, mostly internet browsing , lots of texting, lots of calls, twitter, charging my phone sometimes twice a day...
I get flashed every rom found here, but i always restore my v10k nandroid backup after some time.. Thats my opinion.
Gusta_HR said:
v10k is best rom so far for our device. Im heavy user, mostly internet browsing , lots of texting, lots of calls, twitter, charging my phone sometimes twice a day...
I get flashed every rom found here, but i always restore my v10k nandroid backup after some time.. Thats my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using CM10 because of Gandalf kernels 1.3 GHz, althrough im using it on 1190 MHz with SMARTASSV2 Governor, zRam, Allow purging of assets and Krenel samepage merging in memory management. With these settings my phone is faster in games like Subway Surf (I play it with no laggs at all)
Zdravo Gusta_HR
kristijan505 said:
Im using CM10 because of Gandalf kernels 1.3 GHz, althrough im using it on 1190 MHz with SMARTASSV2 Governor, zRam, Allow purging of assets and Krenel samepage merging in memory management. With these settings my phone is faster in games like Subway Surf (I play it with no laggs at all)
Zdravo Gusta_HR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your phone become unstable, if reboots occured without any visible reason, you fried your cpu. you can't speed up your system with overclocked cpu, but you can damage your phone with that. More RAM installed in our device will significantly speed up system overall. Rest is just painfull placebo effect.
Before lg l7 i got Samsung Galaxy S + (plus) .. an 1.4 ghz clocked variant of famous Samsung galaxy S clocked "only" at 1.0 Ghz. And guess what?? I kept phone underclocked @ 1.0 Ghz working just fine and draining less batterry.
Gusta_HR said:
If your phone become unstable, if reboots occured without any visible reason, you fried your cpu. you can't speed up your system with overclocked cpu, but you can damage your phone with that. More RAM installed in our device will significantly speed up system overall. Rest is just painfull placebo effect.
Before lg l7 i got Samsung Galaxy S + (plus) .. an 1.4 ghz clocked variant of famous Samsung galaxy S clocked "only" at 1.0 Ghz. And guess what?? I kept phone underclocked @ 1.0 Ghz working just fine and draining less batterry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont know about that but I have got Galaxy 3 before L7 and I have overclocked it from 667MHz to 1300MHz with no problems like unstable phone, rebooting or anything else but games were a lot less laggy.