I've been using Clean ROM. Just curious to see what other people are running.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
I used stock from N10 release up until a couple of days ago when i changed to aokp. I must be honest, there are a few things in aokp which are nice, but well, for my usage, it doesn't make any difference, nothing in the rom to convince me that it was worth the change, could happily have stuck with stock jellybean without an issue.
I use Eos with trinity kernel and it's great
AOKP PUB with ktoonz kernel. Perfect for my needs.
Sent from my Nexus 10
Stock with KTManta kernel, I actually like it. Don't need it any other way. I used to think I'd want PA but in the end, I don't mind being stock. Same for my N4, very happy with stock and Nova Launcher
Aokp pub - mr Robinson with Ktmanta . ( but i like the progress work of morific on his trinity kernel. I swap them from time to time )
Sio with ktkoonservative .
Without ktweak app . ( instability , crashes with it )
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
After a month of crack flashing just about every ROM there is for the Nexus 10, I've settled on Rasbeanjelly + Trinity kernel.
SentinelROM 4.10 + KTManta (Governor settings: ktoonservative with zen and in ktoonservative settings changed "disable_hotplug" to 1 instead of 0)
The only instability I noticed is with OTG connected storage. The N10 sometimes reboots when the OTG cable plus storage is plugged in and if I did not unmount the OTG storage before unplugging.
One missing capability that I need is native CIFS share support for those apps that do not have their own such as Power Amp. This is due to multi-user support changes in 4.2.2. Besides cifs.ko (which is supplied in KTManta) the two additional modules md4.ko and nls_utf8.ko are required.
The missing modules prevent apps like CIFSManager from working. Apps such as ES Explorer and XBMC which have built in CIFS support can access your network shares without issue. The author of KTManta already has the addition of the two modules on his very long to-do list.
eos as is
Lately, EOS or RasbeanJelly + Trinity kernel
Rasbeanjelly pub + Trinity...
CleanROM with stock kernel.
Anyone who knows how I contribute to XDA wouldn't be surprised to learn that all my devices run stock, unrooted ROMs. haha
AOKP Pub + trinity Kernel
Awesome combination
MrRobinson's AOKP PUB 4.2.2 rom with KTManta kernel.
vogonpoetlaureate said:
After a month of crack flashing just about every ROM there is for the Nexus 10, I've settled on Rasbeanjelly + Trinity kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same combo for me too. Although I'll likely give franco.Kernel a go once it gets updated.
Cm10.1 and Trinity Kernel (OnDemand + ROW).Works like a charm, no lag no reboots or whatsoever, great battery life. I'm in love whit my tab
Not sent from an iOS#!t device
I'm loving Carbon. The thing I love most it that is has the speed and stability of CM10.1 but the awesome PIE from PA. I also love Trinity kernel
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
EOS
Arcano said:
MrRobinson's AOKP PUB 4.2.2 rom with KTManta kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same for me, I recently switched to it though. I used CM10.1 and Slim ROM's before that. I always come back to the same kernel though.
Related
Just got a brand new Razr Maxx on the cheap! So excited to have freedom from my charger! Made the switch from galaxy nexus just because of the battery life. Anyways, I have rooted the device and installed safestrap 3.0, and I want to install CM10 but I don't know the difference between Kexec and Stock type builds. Can someone please explain the differences for me? From what I've read I think maybe kexec builds can run custom kernels? I did a bunch of searching but I'm clueless still. Although rombitch.com is down, I found a download page on goo.im for hashcode's cm10 builds here (http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/spyder/cm10). Does hashcode upload the same builds as the ones on rombitch.com/spyder, or does anyone have a link for the latest version? Are there any drawbacks from going OEM stock to CM10? From older posts i found in my search battery life and signal issues were present but I'm curious what you all think currently. I am pretty happy with the stock motoblur ics and bloat apps removed surprisingly, but after just 1 day of use I'm already eager to try and get the purest android experience.
Thanks
Wes
wtfmate913 said:
Just got a brand new Razr Maxx on the cheap! So excited to have freedom from my charger! Made the switch from galaxy nexus just because of the battery life. Anyways, I have rooted the device and installed safestrap 3.0, and I want to install CM10 but I don't know the difference between Kexec and Stock type builds. Can someone please explain the differences for me? From what I've read I think maybe kexec builds can run custom kernels? I did a bunch of searching but I'm clueless still. Although rombitch.com is down, I found a download page on goo.im for hashcode's cm10 builds here (http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/spyder/cm10). Does hashcode upload the same builds as the ones on rombitch.com/spyder, or does anyone have a link for the latest version? Are there any drawbacks from going OEM stock to CM10? From older posts i found in my search battery life and signal issues were present but I'm curious what you all think currently. I am pretty happy with the stock motoblur ics and bloat apps removed surprisingly, but after just 1 day of use I'm already eager to try and get the purest android experience.
Thanks
Wes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know the differences other than stock is what is in the OTA ICS builds?
But I do know that what is on goo should be identical to what's on rombitch and rombot.
Sent from my CM10 XT912
Yes kexec can run custom kernels but the builds currently have some big issues, especially the lack of deep sleep so it kills your battery. Moving to cm10 you lose the ability of web top, HDMI, and screen rotation animation.
Full-Throttle Team
moderator at bdhroms.freeforums.org
prsterero said:
Yes kexec can run custom kernels but the builds currently have some big issues, especially the lack of deep sleep so it kills your battery. Moving to cm10 you lose the ability of web top, HDMI, and screen rotation animation.
Full-Throttle Team
moderator at bdhroms.freeforums.org
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also I believe that camera is not working in kexec roms
thanks alot everyone. I got a stock-cm10 build up and running with safestrap v3 and it's running great.
wtfmate913 said:
thanks alot everyone. I got a stock-cm10 build up and running with safestrap v3 and it's running great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did u use Hashcode Rom? I run it in slot 1 and LOVE it. Never a problem. Camera works great!
Hmm I'm on a kexec rom (LiquidSmooth) and deep sleep is working great and the camera also works flawlessly.
Edit: I just realised that OP was created ages ago
Hello there. Yes I have hashcodes ROM installed but at the moment I'm running the new AOKP build that is newly posted. Hashcodes works great but for some reason I still get a problem with the ROM getting stuck at a black screen sometimes when I boot and I can't figure it out. Tried older safe strap version. Deleted ROM slot1 completely...fresh installs...fixed permissions....and I still get that problem.
Comparison
Camera on stock roms is better
also the stability is better on stock roms rarely any crashes
some stock roms give the ability to use some of the motorola goodies.
whereas with kexec u get
smoother UI and android 4.2.2
Innovative features like integrated pie controls and customization( try liquidsmooth)
and also the ability to overclock with the use of the JBX OCE kernel by dtrail1
<---hit thanks if i helped any of u! :laugh:
Gautam Padirooted said:
Camera on stock roms is better
also the stability is better on stock roms rarely any crashes
some stock roms give the ability to use some of the motorola goodies.
whereas with kexec u get
smoother UI and android 4.2.2
Innovative features like integrated pie controls and customization( try liquidsmooth)
and also the ability to overclock with the use of the JBX OCE kernel by dtrail1
<---hit thanks if i helped any of u! :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
mat9v said:
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is this vanilla ROM of which you speak?
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
garywojdan81 said:
What is this vanilla ROM of which you speak?
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are Motorola roms.
mat9v said:
Those are Motorola roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, never heard stock ROMs referred to that way.
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2
mat9v said:
Kexec does not have FHD video recording, not even HD, only SD works for now. Well, you can use LG camera and it does work Full HD but it is not a standard app. Newer dtrail kernels are very stable, I have not had a reboot for over a week, just look @ some screenshots in his kernel thread. CM10.1 is very fast, very overclockable (1.5Ghz in my case) while vanilla rom (ICS or JB) are less overclockable (up to 1.35Ghz) and slower on top of that. They offer some futures not found in CM - webtop mode and working HDMI for example (not to forget about FHD recording).
Debloated vanilla rom would be a good compromise, especially with some custom launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of this will be fixed, be patient, hashcode is working on it! And yes I do prefer Cm 10.1 over stock rom to be honest. I never had any issues with cm 10.1 RC2.
HDMI, webtop and 1080p recording is on his todo-list and I am confident that he will fix it.
I'm not worried or dissatisfied, was just answering a question really I'm using CM10.1 myself and really happy with it.
mat9v said:
I'm not worried or dissatisfied, was just answering a question really I'm using CM10.1 myself and really happy with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know just answering some of question for members who have not tested cm 10.1 and are worried about the performance
wtfmate913 said:
Hello there. Yes I have hashcodes ROM installed but at the moment I'm running the new AOKP build that is newly posted. Hashcodes works great but for some reason I still get a problem with the ROM getting stuck at a black screen sometimes when I boot and I can't figure it out. Tried older safe strap version. Deleted ROM slot1 completely...fresh installs...fixed permissions....and I still get that problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same black screen problem here with AOKP on slot 2- BMM.
and there're same complains on same problem with cm and liquidsmooth
Thread closed.
Thread closed..
Thread closed...
Thread closed...
Thread closed.....
Reserved.
amazing!
will try it on SlimBean rom
thanks mate
SignalX said:
amazing!
will try it on SlimBean rom
thanks mate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just gimme another hour or so, I've a few Linux versions to go to be at 3.0.52
JP.
Hey JP!
Nice to see you made an aosp kernel,bravo!
I was considering trying an aosp based rom but i was wondering...
Are there any bugs or anything that's not working on aosp roms compared to sammy ones?
The last thing i remember that was an issue(a long time ago... )
Was that cm10 had memory leak,which now is fixed...
nfsmw_gr said:
Hey JP!
Nice to see you made an aosp kernel,bravo!
I was considering trying an aosp based rom but i was wondering...
Are there any bugs or anything that's not working on aosp roms compared to sammy ones?
The last thing i remember that was an issue(a long time ago... )
Was that cm10 had memory leak,which now is fixed...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I've been running Paranoid Android 2.54 for one day with stock kernel, and I liked it that much that I decided to "port" my Sammy kernel to CM10, or to be more precise, to add the same mods to a CM10 base as those I added to the Sammy kernel.
I'm test-compiling 3.0.45 right now, next step will be 3.0.52
JP.
Ok, time to shoot, here it is, just readily cooked, be carefull, still hot
Changelog v1.0
Based on CyanogenMod CM10 kernel for i9300 sources (Linux 3.0.31)
updated to kernel.org Linux 3.0.52
using Paranoid Android 2.54 ramdisk
swap support
/proc/config.gz support
optimized for size
Aroma installer with options
USB Forced Fast Charge v1.2a (Yank555.lu)
CPU OC up to 1.6GHz (Yank555.lu)
Triangle Away support (Chainfire)
Dynamic fsync control (faux123)
TCP westwood congest ctrl (faux123)
Proport. Rate Reduction TCP (faux123)
ARM AES/SHA1 (faux123)
JIT compiler for packet filters(faux123)
fix ipv6 protocol lookup (faux123)
ipv4 check ret.val. dst_alloc (faux123)
ipv6 check ret.val. dst_alloc (faux123)
updated LZO compression (faux123)
do_fsync() to fget_light() (faux123)
reduce mali utilization sampling timeout (AndreiLux)
mdnie: custom settings (AndreiLux)
Includes hardcore sharpnes fixes, and black gamma curve adjustment for black crush
ntfs (rw) support (kernel support only)
zram support (Android optimized)
Download link (MD5 fd4bbc970ef350621a8a3ed9c8003e8c)
Please do consider this v1.0 as beta, I've started working on this CM10 kernel this evening, and it's just done compiling, so you're testing this with me
Yank555 said:
Well I've been running Paranoid Android 2.54 for one day with stock kernel, and I liked it that much that I decided to "port" my Sammy kernel to CM10, or to be more precise, to add the same mods to a CM10 base as those I added to the Sammy kernel.
I'm test-compiling 3.0.45 right now, next step will be 3.0.52
JP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see...
Looking good!
Is anything not working or have bugs mate? (on the aosp side i mean not on your kernel)
I think you get that some want to have some info before flashing things on their phones.
nfsmw_gr said:
I see...
Looking good!
Is anything not working or have bugs mate? (on the aosp side i mean not on your kernel)
I think you get that some want to have some info before flashing things on their phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the base (CM10 stock kernel) behaved perfectly well, today (I've not used it any longer, as I got my second S3 only yesterday )
So far, I'm running v1.0 since I compiled it about 1 hour ago, looking peachy, but well 1 hour is quite a little too short to make any conclusions.
JP.
Yank555 said:
Well the base (CM10 stock kernel) behaved perfectly well, today (I've not used it any longer, as I got my second S3 only yesterday )
So far, I'm running v1.0 since I compiled it about 1 hour ago, looking peachy, but well 1 hour is quite a little too short to make any conclusions.
JP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A second S3, wow. :silly:
I use this kernel with Helly_Bean (CM10) and everything is just fine!
Can I change the voltage settings and the touch-boost level?
Thanks!
BenjaminX2 said:
A second S3, wow. :silly:
I use this kernel with Helly_Bean (CM10) and everything is just fine!
Can I change the voltage settings and the touch-boost level?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Voltage control is something I'm not keen on introducing, as it brings close to no battery gain (nothing you could actually really measure) but adds a whole lot of risk of instability, especially users pushing the limits or even slightly above I wouldn't want any flooding with weird random reboot reports due to this
CPU and GPU (governor) behaviour is stock (except for the CPU OC ti 1.6GHz).
JP.
Yank555 said:
Voltage control is something I'm not keen on introducing, as it brings close to no battery gain (nothing you could actually really measure) but adds a whole lot of risk of instability, especially users pushing the limits or even slightly above I wouldn't want any flooding with weird random reboot reports due to this
CPU and GPU (governor) behaviour is stock (except for the CPU OC ti 1.6GHz).
JP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like to undervolt the CPU 100mV and the GPU 25/50mV. That is stable for me and reduces the temperature of the phone a bit. Most noticeable with the touch boost turned down to 200 MHz.
Let's see if a governor change can help.
BenjaminX2 said:
I like to undervolt the CPU 100mV and the GPU 25/50mV. That is stable for me and reduces the temperature of the phone a bit. Most noticeable with the touch boost turned down to 200 MHz.
Let's see if a governor change can help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure using a different gogernor than pegasusq is going to work well...
UV for temperature might be a good idea, but not for better battery as that doesn't realy make any measurable difference, brings only the risk of instability.
JP.
Sent from my Paranoid Android 2.54 / Yank555.lu CM10 kernel v1.0 (3.0.52) powered Galaxy S3 i9300 using Tapatalk 2
Okay,i switched over from hoxhound to helly bean and i must say this is great!
Your kernel works fine here...
I really really reallyyyy hope you update this kernel like the other one!
nfsmw_gr said:
Okay,i switched over from hoxhound to helly bean and i must say this is great!
Your kernel works fine here...
I really really reallyyyy hope you update this kernel like the other one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will keep them in line each time I change something that can fit both
Just moved my daily to PA, switched S3, the white one's in my pocket now
So no worries there
JP.
Sent from my custom ARHD 14.0 / Yank555.lu JB kernel v2.5 Aroma (JB-U6 / Linux 3.0.52) powered Galaxy S3 i9300 using Tapatalk 2
Yank555 said:
Will keep them in line each time I change something that can fit both
Just moved my daily to PA, switched S3, the white one's in my pocket now
So no worries there
JP.
Sent from my custom ARHD 14.0 / Yank555.lu JB kernel v2.5 Aroma (JB-U6 / Linux 3.0.52) powered Galaxy S3 i9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great man!Cheers!
I've received different recommendations from everybody I talked to, but I would like to know what custom kernel people love most right now. I'm running simple rooted version of 4.2.2 right now with the stock kernel. I'm looking for something to improve battery life a bit and get rid of the weird graphical hiccups that can take place when rapidly switching tasks.
Let's hear it. Thanks.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
lr4life said:
I've received different recommendations from everybody I talked to, but I would like to know what custom kernel people love most right now. I'm running simple rooted version of 4.2.2 right now with the stock kernel.
Let's hear it. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using Franco Kernel since the start and it's worked great. Definitely helps with thermal throttling issues.
lr4life said:
I've received different recommendations from everybody I talked to, but I would like to know what custom kernel people love most right now. I'm running simple rooted version of 4.2.2 right now with the stock kernel.
Let's hear it. Thanks.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using KTManta. Works pretty well and I can recommend.
Sent from my Nexus 10 with XDA Premium HD. ROM: AOKP PUB 4.4.2 Kernel: KTManta
Ktmanta is definitely the best kernel on nexus 10, and other devices for that matter. Load it up with the ktweaker app, set it to ktoonservative and row, and :good:
Franco seems to have a cult following, but the kernel just isn't where Ktmanta is at by any means.
Using KTManta, and loving it. I've tried all the others and keep coming back to KTManta. Behind that I would go with Morfic's Trinity kernel.
Franco and Trinity are great kernels that give smooth performance and good battery. KTmanta is also a smooth kernel though and has far more options and tweaks than the other kernels. By default you wont see that much difference on it over the stock kernel though, since ktoonsez does not like to set too many settings different than what stock has for its defaults. But you can easily load up his free tweaking program, or run Trickster MOD, and set any options you want. The ktoonservative governor is by far the best governor for this tablet.
Definitely KTManta great overall performance
Trinity for life.
KTManta
SLP and ZEN for best benchmark score
Ktoonservative and ZEN for best user experience (Which is all that matters)
Trinity little more soft and not so heat producing like other kernels, little help for battery also ..
Ktmanta its too laggy sometimes and not so much help to the battery like most of here are screaming..
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
There is no such thing as `the best' in the specific sense of the question.. They're free.. Go download them and try them yourself. Pick the one "you" feel is the best. Polling the forum isn't going to help you. You know what they say about opinions...
I like franco.Kernel. Can't say it's the best or not though since I really didn't do any in-depth testing.
Plenty kernel I try, at the end, I still back to custom ROM stock kernel.
franco - some issue and not stable.
KTManta - I still not sure why this is so famous, not the best in performance, even after use some people setting, it was better but not really great, and hang up sometimes especially when use certain I/O setting.
Trinity - Quite nice actually, not much to complain about it, but I don't see a need to use it.
By the way, I am happily running mrRobinson AOKP ROM with it own kernel.
I'm actually quite happy with KTManta, using the Zen scheduler and ktoonservative governor. Extremely smooth, lag free, with good battery.
... beamed from my Nexus 10 to your planet
Andrewtst said:
[*]KTManta - I still not sure why this is so famous, not the best in performance, even after use some people setting, it was better but not really great, and hang up sometimes especially when use certain I/O setting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure how that happened. Using suggested settings this is the best performing kernel for me. If you're randomly messing with I/o settings yeah it can cause issues but I wouldn't suggest doing that unless you know what everything does KT + zen(minor tweaks) + ktoonservative + UV = battery and performance for me
Sent from my Nexus 10 using XDA Premium HD app
Andrewtst said:
Plenty kernel I try, at the end, I still back to custom ROM stock kernel.
franco - some issue and not stable.
KTManta - I still not sure why this is so famous, not the best in performance, even after use some people setting, it was better but not really great, and hang up sometimes especially when use certain I/O setting.
Trinity - Quite nice actually, not much to complain about it, but I don't see a need to use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There have been a couple releases with issues for me on KTManta kernel, but a couple releases out of the 20 or so versions is not much. The issues are quickly fixed and a new version put out anyway so maybe you just happened to come in and try it on one of those releases. This kernel is so popular because it has the most active dev and the most options.
And why do you think the Franco kernel is not stable?
For what its worth, Im partial to Franco's r3 kernel--having tested the others. It improved my overall web browsing smoothness on 4.2.2 which is all I was looking for after moving from 4.2.1. As previously stated, what's "best" for me may not be "best" for others. Cheers!
Kernels much like silicon slabs are unique...each device will respond differently. Try em all...and pick your favorite.
Sent from my SGH-T889
You know actually.....
They are all good, if you know what you are doing.
Trinity and Franco are the best if you just want to set and forget. KTmanta is the best if you want to tweak and have options to play with.
Anyone running these? I would have asked this in the development thread but as I am a new user I am unable to post there yet.
Anyways, I just loaded up CM 10.1, the latest nightly and I just don't find it as smooth as stock on Android Revolution HD (which I also tried). Sometimes the transitions feel fine but other times it is just sluggish.
Anyone know if CM is using the GPU for all transitions or if there is some option I have to turn on to get it to? I would have figured CM would be just as fast if not faster than the stock HTC one rom.
Thanks
Well you did install a nightly, and this is very early alpha. So it's not really optimized well yet. May not ever be as quick and snappy as a Sense ROM. When the nexus version comes out though and they build cyanogen mod with that, then it'll probably have no lag at all though and will run faster than a sense ROM.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4 Beta
cyrus_mc said:
Anyone running these? I would have asked this in the development thread but as I am a new user I am unable to post there yet.
Anyways, I just loaded up CM 10.1, the latest nightly and I just don't find it as smooth as stock on Android Revolution HD (which I also tried). Sometimes the transitions feel fine but other times it is just sluggish.
Anyone know if CM is using the GPU for all transitions or if there is some option I have to turn on to get it to? I would have figured CM would be just as fast if not faster than the stock HTC one rom.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i was told that the sluggish ui was due to how a kernel built with mpdecision handles hotplugging of the cpu cores basically mpdecision unplugs the cores too early and the result can be seen as sluggishness in a UI, i downloaded the teamseven aosp kernel with mpdecision disabled, its using a franco's hotplugging solution, and then set the min freq to 486mhz and the ui is alot smoother.
I haven't tried any recent builds, but I would generally say stay away from the nightlies until at least June 26th, when the HTC One with AOSP is released. Once that is public, all the bugs and performance issues in the CM build should be sorted out. I'd expect the actual rom image to leak before that, but hey, who knows.
djkinetic said:
i was told that the sluggish ui was due to how a kernel built with mpdecision handles hotplugging of the cpu cores basically mpdecision unplugs the cores too early and the result can be seen as sluggishness in a UI, i downloaded the teamseven aosp kernel with mpdecision disabled, its using a franco's hotplugging solution, and then set the min freq to 486mhz and the ui is alot smoother.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is Franco doing a kernel for the HTC One?
Valdeck said:
Is Franco doing a kernel for the HTC One?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no but the TeamSeven AOSP kernel has a ported version of his hotplug method.
djkinetic said:
no but the TeamSeven AOSP kernel has a ported version of his hotplug method.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is the TeamSeven AOSP Kernel located?
jznomoney said:
Where is the TeamSeven AOSP Kernel located?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its in the HTC One Original Development Section. The ATT Hardware is the exact same as the International Dev Hardware, so anythin released on that Dev forum is compatible with ours.
Hey, I have my Galaxy note 2 on stock rom, 4.1.2. Odexed
I was wondering which is the best kernel that supports swaping external memory on internal
I really need your help, i dont know which kernel I should choose, I was going to try redpill kernel but people are saying that it has battery draining problems
Please help me, I baby my note 2 and I would rather die than seeing my note 2 having issues, and thats why I dont flash custom roms
Or, if there is a way to swap external mem on internal with some kind of app or OTHER WAY THAN A KERNEL
Thanks
You can use search button for that script. And you have to use kernel with init.d support.
perseus has best battery life with good performance, high costumisation by stweaks. agni best performance set by trickster mod problem is i can't set over the gpu... neak is good but i think it,s not so smooth. that was a shot review of some kernel. my choice at the time is agni
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Perseus really does have the best battery drain.
But it lags in games.
Redpill has the best audio engine. Scoobydoo
Some members like. Neak more. Wolfson
Adam is currently going into the right way... You could. Try adam... Seems to. Ne. Very good.
Every custom kernel supports init.d.
Just flash the mod exsd2internalsd..... And you're good to go
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Stock is the best kernel, if you care about performance. Period.
But you'll realize that after using a fluid ROM like ARHD, with stock ROM performance of all kernels felt same to me. Still if I had to choose one I'd go for N.E.A.K, as it is pretty straightforward with nifty features, just if it had the exFAT support!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
jujuburi said:
Stock is the best kernel, if you care about performance. Period.
But you'll realize that after using a fluid ROM like ARHD, with stock ROM performance of all kernels felt same to me. Still if I had to choose one I'd go for N.E.A.K, as it is pretty straightforward with nifty features, just if it had the exFAT support!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know on what basis you're making this claim, but anyways it's been the exact opposite for me - Redpill, Perseus, Devil all have great fluidity (had to mess about with the settings of Perseus a bit to eliminate the initial lag - but with no other) - and I haven't tried OC/UV much. Not to mention the headphone/speaker amp and saturation prevention options, screen calibration etc. which you miss out on stock.
tuxonhtc said:
I don't know on what basis you're making this claim, but anyways it's been the exact opposite for me - Redpill, Perseus, Devil all have great fluidity (had to mess about with the settings of Perseus a bit to eliminate the initial lag - but with no other) - and I haven't tried OC/UV much. Not to mention the headphone/speaker amp and saturation prevention options, screen calibration etc. which you miss out on stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The basis was my own testing with Perseus, Red Pill and even Adam, for a pretty long time. Not a single one was as fast and fluid as stock, even with the modified settings of stock kernel found here,
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=41902544&postcount=4602
Oh, and as I said, if you are on stock ROM you won't notice anything, that's why I used Perseus as long as I was on stock ROM, but since I moved to ARHD, there was no other option other than stock.
Yes, I agree there are some advantages of custom kernels, like saturation prevention as you said, but no way I was giving up very noticeable performance degradation for some extra features without which I am not bothered at all. And since I installed Viper there are some amplifications, so that point is unchecked from custom kernels advantage list.
PS: If you have no problem could you send me your settings of whatever kernel you are using? I wanna try once more and see. Please don't bother if that kernel doesn't support exFAT.
jujuburi said:
The basis was my own testing with Perseus, Red Pill and even Adam, for a pretty long time. Not a single one was as fast and fluid as stock, even with the modified settings of stock kernel found here,
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=41902544&postcount=4602
Oh, and as I said, if you are on stock ROM you won't notice anything, that's why I used Perseus as long as I was on stock ROM, but since I moved to ARHD, there was no other option other than stock.
Yes, I agree there are some advantages of custom kernels, like saturation prevention as you said, but no way I was giving up very noticeable performance degradation for some extra features without which I am not bothered at all. And since I installed Viper there are some amplifications, so that point is unchecked from custom kernels advantage list.
PS: If you have no problem could you send me your settings of whatever kernel you are using? I wanna try once more and see. Please don't bother if that kernel doesn't support exFAT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never ever stayed stock except for the while I had to send it to service. Otherwise I used redpill (exFAT supported) and I've noticed no difference at all from when I had stock unrooted. What's your issue - are you experiencing lag with custom kernels? Or what?
Fair point regarding Viper (love it and use it always myself), but FLL tuning and DAC resampling options make it sound better at that. IMO.
I stay on Perseus, mainly because of its color calibration and all the Stweaks customization features. Now if I use stock kernel, I feel my screen is completly unrealistic, almost fluorescent lol
As for performances, the Note 2 is just powerful enough not to see any difference between kernels. People using ARHD will always tell you that stock kernel is the best for the following reason: Mike1986 says stock is the best and won't give support if you're using another kernel. Period.
I'm using ARHD, but can't stand the fake colors and the lack of customization provided by stock kernel (no GPU overclock for example, no CPU overclock, nothing you can do if your "whites" are pink or blue, etc)
i900frenchaddict said:
As for performances, the Note 2 is just powerful enough not to see any difference between kernels. People using ARHD will always tell you that stock kernel is the best for the following reason: Mike1986 says stock is the best and won't give support if you're using another kernel. Period.
I'm using ARHD, but can't stand the fake colors and the lack of customization provided by stock kernel (no GPU overclock for example, no CPU overclock, nothing you can do if your "whites" are pink or blue, etc)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the hell does this suppose to mean? Mike says.....blah blah....I don't care what Mike says! And what support are you talking about? I was on Perseus while I was using A.R.H.D, one can flash any kernel on ARHD, what to support there?
It's my view, and I am quite sure of all the ARHD users too, the stock kernel gives much more fluid and lag free performance than any other kernel available. Everybody likes customization, but as I said not with the price of performance compromise.
And you can OC GPU/CPU with Tegrak on Stock kernel. Get your facts straight before typing some gibberish.
Perfect example of why "best ROM/kernel" threads are not allowed.
Thread closed.
Towle
XDA Moderator