I just saw this : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=41115145
Will this affect us who love the JB ROMs as there is no Kernel Source for JB yet from hTC
It will affect us if we post JB ROMs which are not based on stock kernel without releasing the source code. So I think we should show up in the thread there and start gathering devices which face the same or a similar problem, so we can form a greater community against those manufacturers.
Yes it will affect, basically according to it your JB ROM is against rules
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
What I understand is, if using the stock boot.img and there is no source code for it, we have to remove the boot.img from the ROM as every users supposed to have the stock boot.img in their device.
I have no problem to remove the boot.img but the problem is we have many noobs which are not so sure with all the workaround and how to get things done
buggingme said:
Yes it will affect, basically according to it your JB ROM is against rules
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
ckpv5 said:
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
hcdav said:
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes obviously :laugh:
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Hi
ckpv5 said:
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good::goodont worry, you can unpack the stock boot.img. Just make some harmless changes in ramdisk and repack it. Then share the modified ramdisk on github along with zImage.
PM me if you need help on this.
Regards
Yasir
P.S. I know its a workaround, so some xda recognized dev is welcome to correct me if what i said above is wrong.:good::good:
I found This:
zelendel says:
"This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom."
So i guess, custom JB Rom by you is in danger of removal.
neXus PRIME said:
So i guess, custom JB Rom by you is in danger of removal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is ok if I remove the kernel.
It just that I don't have much time to redo the ROM.
I'll try to find time to make init.d support without ramdisk mod and post updated ROM.
If I don't have enough time, I can only upload a new ROM after I come back from vacation in mid June
hcdav said:
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats whole point of zelendels post, also dont like to hear that, i think i have to download roms I wanted to try next week in advance
Now the question is whether we can boot jb with our ics kernel or not.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
prototype-U said:
Now the question is whether we can boot jb with our ics kernel or not.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried. Used ics zimage with jb ram disk. Logcat is ok . Display never appears. Unlocks n vibrates. But you can't see anything
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Could it be possible just to use kernel from kernel.org, config from ICS HTC and adjusting this config a bit so that it works or is the kernel from android too much different from the linux kernel?
So i unnecessarily try to use prebuilt 3.4 kernel for cm10.1 because if it will working, i won't be able to share it -.-
atis112 said:
So i unnecessarily try to use prebuilt 3.4 kernel for cm10.1 because if it will working, i won't be able to share it -.-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your hard work is nonetheless appreciated, thank you for that and also your efforts towards organising the petition etc.
Ok, but if I'm not mistaken, as soon as HTC releases JB's kernel sources every ROM based on it will be "legal" or according to xda rules and not been removed right?
May be they're waiting for every country to get JB by OTA to release them (I believe only India doesn't have received it yet if I'm not mistaken).
By the way @atis112, did you get any answer from GPL?
Have you all a great day
Enviado desde mi HTC Desire X usando Tapatalk 2
gbueno6 said:
Ok, but if I'm not mistaken, as soon as HTC releases JB's kernel sources every ROM based on it will be "legal" or according to xda rules and not been removed right?
May be they're waiting for every country to get JB by OTA to release them (I believe only India doesn't have received it yet if I'm not mistaken).
By the way @atis112, did you get any answer from GPL?
Have you all a great day
Enviado desde mi HTC Desire X usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not yet. I think we need to wait some weeks for their answere.
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
zelendel said:
If a recovery is being posted for a device that has no kernel source then it is removed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ckpv5 said:
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems to be... So we should download the existing recoveries as fast as we can before they are deleted...
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda premium
ckpv5 said:
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Recovery working fine with ics kernel on JB too.
Related
Hi guys.
I am going to get a Canvas HD soon. I want to know that there was MIUI Rom for the device. What happened to it? Why the development was stopped? Violation of GPL? How does it relate?
Xumit said:
Hi guys.
I am going to get a Canvas HD soon. I want to know that there was MIUI Rom for the device. What happened to it? Why the development was stopped? Violation of GPL? How does it relate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For temoparay it is stopped its As we had got 4.2 Rom ......Developer will make stable MIUI 5..
Thats great! But still Im confused how GPL violation comes in picture.
Xumit said:
Thats great! But still Im confused how GPL violation comes in picture.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
huh dat i dnt know try to contact the dev of MIUI5 kumar.abhisek
Xumit said:
Thats great! But still Im confused how GPL violation comes in picture.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The GPL requires that whenever a linux kernel is distributed that the kernel sources are also made available. If the OEM for a device never releases the kernel sources, then it means that the stock kernel can not be distributed on xda. The ROMs should be fine as long as there is no boot.img inside the flashable zip. So all the custom ROMs will either have to have custom kernels or be compatible with the stock kernel found on everyone's device.
Miui 5 stable will be rereleased soon
I request moderators to move miui 5 locked thread to A116 forums
Sent from my C6502 using xda premium
Thanks! Glad to know that! Its really amazing rom. Thanks for all the work done for CHD community.
Sent from my Micromax A116 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
no bugs
hope the new ROM will have no bugs....
hoping for the latest & stable build of Miui v5, i guess zopo c2 base rom is better than amoi n828 correct me if im wrong :fingers-crossed:
Non-dev discussion thread for this ROM: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2337389
Hmm, so for working wifi we need a source code of 4.1 kernel?
Klapo said:
Hmm, so for working wifi we need a source code of 4.1 kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No 4.1 kernel, just 3.4 . But we don't need that for wifi. Just need time
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Will sync repo and try fixing up some stuff tonight. Great job @atis112
Guys, is there any chance to have full working CM 10.1 for our device? And is HTC good in giving resources or not?
I come from Sony and they give resources after they release a new rom, but their phones are buggy and not quality.
mirost1 said:
Guys, is there any chance to have full working CM 10.1 for our device? And is HTC good in giving resources or not?
I come from Sony and they give resources after they release a new rom, but their phones are buggy and not quality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We cant measure it in chance. It depends on how much dev support we get.
Does the internal storage work ? Man this is great work ! Thanks @atis112
P.s I know you mentioned storage doesn't work ? Just not clear which storage you meant ?
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
mirost1 said:
Guys, is there any chance to have full working CM 10.1 for our device? And is HTC good in giving resources or not?
I come from Sony and they give resources after they release a new rom, but their phones are buggy and not quality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
100% chance. I guarantee you. Im not kidding or making fun. Devs like atis112 and others dont take much time fixing stuff. Plus the reason i'm so confident is, we have kernel 3.4 (sources will also come eventually), we have OEM STOCK JB, so we dont have to backport any thing.
lets try to fix storage and wifi first, then rest.
Just compiled a build with fixes for bt,wifi,storage and gps. Lets see if it boots up :laugh:
neXus PRIME said:
100% chance. I guarantee you. Im not kidding or making fun. Devs like atis112 and others dont take much time fixing stuff. Plus the reason i'm so confident is, we have kernel 3.4 (sources will also come eventually), we have OEM STOCK JB, so we dont have to backport any thing.
lets try to fix storage and wifi first, then rest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope for the best buddy, if i was a dev i would def help, but the only thing i can do is hitting thanx and donating eventually - fingers crossed for all of you devs... :good:
EDIT: Guys let me ask you something i dont get - why someone is asking if CM 10.1 is working with TWRP recovery? I thought you must flash provided recovery and flash rom?
(on sony phones you download rom, extract recovery, put rom on sdcard, fastboot recovery and via installed recovery/cwm you install the rom. But you def use the provided recovery)
mirost1 said:
I hope for the best buddy, if i was a dev i would def help, but the only thing i can do is hitting thanx and donating eventually - fingers crossed for all of you devs... :good:
EDIT: Guys let me ask you something i dont get - why someone is asking if CM 10.1 is working with TWRP recovery? I thought you must flash provided recovery and flash rom?
(on sony phones you download rom, extract recovery, put rom on sdcard, fastboot recovery and via installed recovery/cwm you install the rom. But you def use the provided recovery)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can flash the rom with any recovery.. he's asking because he is new to this place..
prototype-U said:
Just compiled a build with fixes for bt,wifi,storage and gps. Lets see if it boots up :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did it boot with all the fixes you applied?
navmad
navmad said:
Did it boot with all the fixes you applied?
navmad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
17 mins remaining..
---------- Post added at 05:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ----------
nvm
prototype-U said:
17 mins remaining..
---------- Post added at 05:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ----------
nvm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did it boot ?
slow
guys, its great that we have CM now..but can anyone tell me why it is slow ? i know there's much work to be done..but is there something related to speed ?
krishna.kowshik said:
guys, its great that we have CM now..but can anyone tell me why it is slow ? i know there's much work to be done..but is there something related to speed ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, Deleted!
atis112 said:
Because devs have life too. :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey atis..lol..im not asking about the speed of rom development..i'm asking about the speed of the rom..i felt its a bit slow..i'm asking is there any work to be done related to speed !
krishna.kowshik said:
hey atis..lol..im not asking about the speed of rom development..i'm asking about the speed of the rom..i felt its a bit slow..i'm asking is there any work to be done related to speed !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL. Sorry. 3.4 kernel could help for us. It will be faster with v-sync, and with latest kernel features.
atis112 said:
LOL. Sorry. 3.4 kernel could help for us. It will be faster with v-sync, and with latest kernel features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And overclock...
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda premium
atis112 said:
LOL. Sorry. 3.4 kernel could help for us. It will be faster with v-sync, and with latest kernel features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are compiling with ics kernel source??? so thats y u used
TARGET_NO_HW_VSYNC := true
Hello, I'm searching for totally clean ROM. That means ROM builded from source code without any improvements or Google Edition ROM. Is it possible to build this ROM? And what do I need? And what cloud be barrier? Thanks for reply.
Whats the problem with CM?
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
banan1 said:
Hello, I'm searching for totally clean ROM. That means ROM builded from source code without any improvements or Google Edition ROM. Is it possible to build this ROM? And what do I need? And what cloud be barrier? Thanks for reply.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You would need, command and skills on coding, Ubuntu or any linux os, and a source.
micu13 said:
Whats the problem with CM?
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is already a project and it aint anywhere near completion maybe or perhaps hes not fond of cm
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
I dont have any problem with CM. But I think that it is a little bit unstable. I don't know anything about android development, but at first I think that it works like windows or linux. You have OS and drivers and together it works well. Where is problem with build clean android rom + add drivers?
banan1 said:
I dont have any problem with CM. But I think that it is a little bit unstable. I don't know anything about android development, but at first I think that it works like windows or linux. You have OS and drivers and together it works well. Where is problem with build clean android rom + add drivers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not exactly like you said. And for clean rom, its name is AOSP. And when our CM will be bugfree also an AOSP rom, or like you name it a clean rom, will be available.
xpirt
great. So now I'm waiting for AOSP rom. Can I donate somebody for support in development?
banan1 said:
great. So now I'm waiting for AOSP rom. Can I donate somebody for support in development?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Atis112 is the man
xpirt
Hi everybody. All who currently use (or have been using) Gingerbread on our precious U's
knows that there isn't any custom kernel for GB with working wifi tether. I'm aware
of GingerBeanSS where everything works, but CWM is integrated into ROM, rather than in kernel.
So, after some research I've managed to fix wifi tether in custom kernel
Features of this kernel are the same as one from here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2064997
which is I believe in turn based on:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1688147
Additions made by me:
-fixed wifi tether;
-Busybox updated to 1.20.2;
-Superuser replaced with SuperSU (latest version, 1.91).
Without any further ado, here are download links,
one for the kernel.elf and one for the flashable zip (CWM):
ELF file:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/b75q4gco8ec5zgd/kernel.elf
CWM zip:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/ms5uahhqyfmle4u/StockGbkernel.zip
I hope you will find this useful
Big thanks to @DooMLoRD for creating this kernel in first place!
Tell me that it is KEXEC enabled… O_O
DaniPhii said:
Tell me that it is KEXEC enabled… O_O
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must stress that I'm just low-level "developer". I just tinker until I find the solution
But to my knowledge, I don't believe that this could be done for GB roms
evildev said:
I must stress that I'm just low-level "developer". I just tinker until I find the solution
But to my knowledge, I don't believe that this could be done for GB roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ouch, that's a pity… Thank you both a lot for this anyway!
DaniPhii said:
Ouch, that's a pity… Thank you both a lot for this anyway!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pleasure
Good job bro ! thanks... I'm still on GB, the best choice IMHO :fingers-crossed:
guitarfreedom said:
Good job bro ! thanks... I'm still on GB, the best choice IMHO :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried every possible ROM for Xperia U. On every single ROM, there was something that bugged me, but on GB, user experience is unparalleled. Everything is so snappy, fluid, fast... Not a single hitch! All which I have to lose are newer versions of Opera, Chrome and Gmail, but I can live without those. Finally I can use my phone as phone, without call/SMS lags, while still using it as a multimedia device
I have tried every possible ROM for Xperia U. On every single ROM, there was something that bugged me, but on GB, user experience is unparalleled. Everything is so snappy, fluid, fast... Not a single hitch! All which I have to lose are newer versions of Opera, Chrome and Gmail, but I can live without those. Finally I can use my phone as phone, without call/SMS lags, while still using it as a multimedia device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you! I have tried all other roms, but GB is faster in general, in multitasking, in autofocus etc ...and so I came back every time !
I've ever thought that we need a better kernel... And you, maybe, point to this way!
Sent from my ST25i using xda app-developers app
Yayy. Now we can add governors, more frequencies and tweaks : D
Sent from my Xperia U using xda app-developers app
satya-1998 said:
Yayy. Now we can add governors, more frequencies and tweaks : D
Sent from my Xperia U using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whoa, hold your horses I'm not that crafty and I don't have that much time on my hands (have to study for my exams), but if anyone is willing to add them, please, be my guest
Please upload your kernel source to GitHub, as kernel sources are under GPLv2 license you must share it
Enviado desde mi Xperia U mediante Tapatalk
Garcia98 said:
Please upload your kernel source to GitHub, as kernel sources are under GPLv2 license you must share it
Enviado desde mi Xperia U mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As stated in the OP, kernel isn't my original work, I just fixed and updated some things by means of tearing apart and putting back together kernels which can be found by following links provided in OP. I know that first version of this kernel was made by DooMLoRD.
Maybe I should put link to Sony's sources, since this is just a stock based kernel with added functionality?
I was afraid that someone would come asking this
P.S.
I am pretty noobish concerning android development, so I don't know my way around GitHub. If anyone is willing, he is free to upload it there
evildev said:
As stated in the OP, kernel isn't my original work, I just fixed and updated some things by means of tearing apart and putting back together kernels which can be found by following links provided in OP. I know that first version of this kernel was made by DooMLoRD.
Maybe I should put link to Sony's sources, since this is just a stock based kernel with added functionality?
I was afraid that someone would come asking this
P.S.
I am pretty noobish concerning android development, so I don't know my way around GitHub. If anyone is willing, he is free to upload it there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhm, you have compiled this kernel from source, haven't you?
Enviado desde mi Xperia U mediante Tapatalk
Garcia98 said:
Uhm, you have compiled this kernel from source, haven't you?
Enviado desde mi Xperia U mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess is stock 184 zimage with ramdisk edits.
Diego910 said:
I guess is stock 184 zimage with ramdisk edits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly.
evildev said:
exactly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, so I think that is not necessary to upload the source.
Sorry for my misunderstood
Enviado desde mi Xperia U mediante Tapatalk
Garcia98 said:
Ok, so I think that is not necessary to upload the source.
Sorry for my misunderstood
Enviado desde mi Xperia U mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't be worried As long as we share, I love this community. I love to have space where everything is shared, and I understand what open source means and I respect that. Like you, I love when everything is properly tagged and credits are given. I love open source
can anyone make a flashable zip?
Sent from my ST25a using xda app-developers app
HollowCrown said:
can anyone make a flashable zip?
Sent from my ST25a using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at the OP, links are now updated
Here is a kernel for stock Cyanogen OS13.x/13.0/12.1 with hardboot support (To use the stock Rom as primary Rom in Multirom)
Code:
Use my kernel only if you are sure about the risks of flashing custom Roms/Kernel to your device. I'm is not responsible for any damage caused by using one of my files.
I have attached 2 file types.
The .img files to flash it with fastboot or an kernel flasher app.
The .zip files to flash it with a custom recovery
The COS13.0 ZNH0EAS26M kernel will also work on COS13.0 ZNH0EAS2JK
The COS13.1.1 ZNH2KAS2X1 kernel will also work on COS13.1.2 ZNH2KAS3P0
Sources:
https://github.com/bauner/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8974
thank you so much :victory::victory::victory:
just flashed this on top of your fix
phone is stuck at cyanogen logo now
apparently I should have update to CM12 first now everything is fine.
900 something views and 2 comments...! very supportive pple in this forum nowadays.. cant get even a referance.
Great Kernel mod. Thanks... Confirmed working on my 1+1 64GB. Flashed multiboot and used flashify to update TWRP.. great work.. Thanks again.
NOW ME PHONE RUNNING THE PASINO AND THE SOKP.. MUSIC WHEN AND HOW I WANT IT>
comexx said:
just flashed this on top of your fix
phone is stuck at cyanogen logo now
apparently I should have update to CM12 first now everything is fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel in this thread is for cos12.1 YOG4P only!
It will not work with cos12 or cm11s
@bauner do you intend to develop this kernel any further? i like it
maxed4901 said:
@bauner do you intend to develop this kernel any further? i like it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there will come another official cos update I will make a new version with multirom support.
Currently I will not add more features to the kernel because the stock kernel without any more features is currently working very fast and stable
bauner said:
If there will come another official cos update I will make a new version with multirom support.
Currently I will not add more features to the kernel because the stock kernel without any more features is currently working very fast and stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it definitely is working well.. thanks though and look forward to future builds.:good:
bauner said:
If there will come another official cos update I will make a new version with multirom support.
Currently I will not add more features to the kernel because the stock kernel without any more features is currently working very fast and stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi!
YOG4PAS2QL seems to be out.
Wondering if the kernel was changed, if yes, can you please release a patched version?
Tnx!
Hello?
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Pls provide kernel for latest OTA with multirom support
Hi @Bauer. I have been alive because of your kernel. I keep stock ROM as stock multirom base ROM and install other ROMs. It started with your YOG4PAS1N0 kernel version. Now that there's an update...I would like to request you to update version please.I cannot update otherwise..If I do..I will lose my other ROMs.. I do not wish to use another kernel except stock one please.
Dusha999 said:
Hi!
YOG4PAS2QL seems to be out.
Wondering if the kernel was changed, if yes, can you please release a patched version?
Tnx!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phate00 said:
Pls provide kernel for latest OTA with multirom support
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maxed4901 said:
Hi @Bauer. I have been alive because of your kernel. I keep stock ROM as stock multirom base ROM and install other ROMs. It started with your YOG4PAS1N0 kernel version. Now that there's an update...I would like to request you to update version please.I cannot update otherwise..If I do..I will lose my other ROMs.. I do not wish to use another kernel except stock one please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel source seems to be the same
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_oneplus_bacon/commits/stable/cm-12.1-YOG4P
I will check in the next days if there are changes in the init scripts.
If there are changes I will make an updated version soon.
But for now you can use my current kernel in YOG4PAS2QL too.
I use it myself without any problems
bauner said:
The kernel source seems to be the same
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_oneplus_bacon/commits/stable/cm-12.1-YOG4P
I will check in the next days if there are changes in the init scripts.
If there are changes I will make an updated version soon.
But for now you can use my current kernel in YOG4PAS2QL too.
I use it myself without any problems
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for keeping the kernel alive @bauner. And thanks for confirming that but still look forward to the update.
maxed4901 said:
Thanks for keeping the kernel alive @bauner. And thanks for confirming that but still look forward to the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have now compared the YOG4PAS1NO and YOG4PAS2QL ramdisks they are exactly the same.
So there is currently no need to make a new version
bauner said:
I have now compared the YOG4PAS1NO and YOG4PAS2QL ramdisks they are exactly the same.
So there is currently no need to make a new version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YOG4PAS3JL is out
It is reported to have Google search bar fix and 1NOV security update from Google.
Don't know if this patch covers kernel as well...
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Dusha999 said:
YOG4PAS3JL is out
It is reported to have Google search bar fix and 1NOV security update from Google.
Don't know if this patch covers kernel as well...
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for the info.
I will check it soon
Dusha999 said:
YOG4PAS3JL is out
It is reported to have Google search bar fix and 1NOV security update from Google.
Don't know if this patch covers kernel as well...
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a few changes in the init scripts.
I have attached a new version for YOG4PAS3JL in the first post
Thanks for super duper fast update...