Guys, do any of you know if there is an OC Kernel for the SGP311 around, or if there is one in development? If not would there be any devs kind enoguh to make one :fingers-crossed:
right now there is no public publishment of a OC kernel for the sgp311 or sgp312. now i am not sure if you are running stock or aosp. but the Carbon dev has a custom kernel that has lower mhz and voltage control plus other things. there is no overclocking on that kernel. but at the moment i have asked him if i can use his kernel as a base to add OC and few more governors thats i like :fingers-crossed:
Hi there.
I was wondering if you've made some progess on the kernel.
Thanks.
There has been a kernel released which allows you to overclock recently (up to 1838 MHz). It's right here. Go show the devs some love. It's for the stock firmware only at the minute, but he's planning on making one for aosp too.
r1ntse said:
There has been a kernel released which allows you to overclock recently (up to 1838 MHz). It's right here. Go show the devs some love. It's for the stock firmware only at the minute, but he's planning on making one for aosp too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, i knew about that kernel.
But… well it looks like it's from an inexperienced dev and it doesn't seem to perform well…
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the effort from the device but it's not for me…
Pihkal said:
Yeah, i knew about that kernel.
But… well it looks like it's from an inexperienced dev and it doesn't seem to perform well…
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the effort from the device but it's not for me…
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been running it and i get the exact same battery life, yet i get a 10322 score on quadrant. I don't seem how it's not performing well...
r1ntse said:
I've been running it and i get the exact same battery life, yet i get a 10322 score on quadrant. I don't seem how it's not performing well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if you read the (very short) thread it states that the performance is really bad.
At what frequency are you getting this score?
I'm getting 76xx on Quadrant, all stock speeds.
I still have a locked bootloader and am only willing to unlock if there's a good reason for it, like let's say DoomLord's kernel but since he stopped developing for the SGP311 and there's no other experienced dev I'm thinking it's not worth it.
But that's just my opinion.
We really need some good devs for the device, I mean come on, it's a great tablet!
Related
Hey Guys
I am currently loving my new SG2
and the fact there is already so much development going on for it makes me excited for the future of this phone,
I just wanted some advice,
I have flashed pulsar_g2's Villian Rom in anticipation of what he has to offer in the future,
Which Kernel is better to use?
I have also Flashed coolbho3000 OC's Kernel so i can play with the OC on my SG2
What is the difference between it and Supercurio's Kernel,
And Which is better to use?
Thanks for your advice
Sirklip said:
Hey Guys
I am currently loving my new SG2
and the fact there is already so much development going on for it makes me excited for the future of this phone,
I just wanted some advice,
I have flashed pulsar_g2's Villian Rom in anticipation of what he has to offer in the future,
Which Kernel is better to use?
I have also Flashed coolbho3000 OC's Kernel so i can play with the OC on my SG2
What is the difference between it and Supercurio's Kernel,
And Which is better to use?
Thanks for your advice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would recommend the OC kernel, as it has the choice of governors in SetCPU.
Remember that I say this with no reason other than I'd be flashing it, if I had a phone to flash OC seems unnecessary from reviews, but the extra governors seems a good idea.
Thanks for the reply,
I will keep this setup untill bigger and better things get released,
Which shouldn't be to long
I've been browsing the development threads for weeks now and the more I read the more confused I get regarding which Kernel to use on my GS2 (XXKG2). I guess like everybody I'd like the best combination between maximum speed, battery durability and safety.
At the moment I'm using stock with CPU Master.
Any thoughts?
Hm, tough thing to answer.
Chainfire root- The simplest one out there. Keeps the kernel close to Stock.
Ninphetamine- Supports BLN, Overclocking, Voltage Tweaks etc.
There are few others too, but as I haven't tried them won't comment. Any kernel can be used with Stock firmware. Can't say about Custom firmwares as I am not interested.
Regards.
[KERNEL] SpeedMod SGS2 [K1-T27 CWM4 CIFS ROOT]
Forget about Ninphetamine unless you want to overclock.
neophyte's mirage kernel is also good for batt life. it has finer tweak settings for voltages as compared to other kernels.
I've tried them all ninpo kernel and speedmod are two of the best. Currently using the tweaked speedmod by rage which allows undervolting. Ninpo kernel gives excellent standby idle rate.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
I like speedmod because i dont bother about BLN or overclocking. (1.2 GHz not good enough for you? ) And i find the governer to be more aggressive and stable on speedmod. It spends more time on the lower frequencies too, saving more battery.
I'm trying the speedmod kernel but even though the benchmark is higher it doesn't seem as fast as the original XXKG2. For instance, I'm using "Photo Wall live wallpaper" and whenever I wake up the phone it takes like a second to refresh and load the photos...this didn't happen with XXKG2 (it was instantaneous).
What is a faster but still stable kernel alternative?
You could ask a 100 people and get 100 different answers.
The kernel that is best for you is the one you try and like the best. Just because one person likes a kernel doesn't mean you will as you've already found out.
Man up, do some downloading and find out for yourself.
Bynar010 said:
You could ask a 100 people and get 100 different answers.
The kernel that is best for you is the one you try and like the best. Just because one person likes a kernel doesn't mean you will as you've already found out.
Man up, do some downloading and find out for yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How helpful. I think you might just have been Ghandi in a different life.
There is a reason why I've posted this in the Q&A instead of in the development section where I would probably get an answer like yours.
I don't take chances with a 600us$ phone and won't be installing all available kernels when I can get advice here first (the reason forums like this actually exists and the reason why I love them...well, most of the time).
Photos live wallpaper etc would be more of a rom thing, than a kernel thing.
As far as best or what have you kernel, there is no best, i find ninphetamine to be good, you may not, and this might just end up turning into another thread of generic repetition and general uselessness.
The best way is to try them, as the person above said.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I am using KG6 with ninpheghamine 2.1.3 and quick and giving me almost two days of battery life but again maybe other kernels out there are better. You can try other ones and compare.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
rawfa said:
How helpful. I think you might just have been Ghandi in a different life.
There is a reason why I've posted this in the Q&A instead of in the development section where I would probably get an answer like yours.
I don't take chances with a 600us$ phone and won't be installing all available kernels when I can get advice here first (the reason forums like this actually exists and the reason why I love them...well, most of the time).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Christ on a bike. You do understand what you are getting into when you start dicking around with your phone and custom kernels don't you? You don't take chances with a 600 dollar phone - I'm afraid you are doing, everytime you install any custom rom or custom kernel. However there is no more risk in installing one custom kernel than another custom kernel (when they are out of beta anyway), but what people prefer is massively subjective! Theres no such thing as "the most balanced kernel" because people have differing views on which kernel offers this for them.
If your not sure about a kernel why not read the thread for that kernel and see what feedback its got. If you open a thread like this you'll get a ton of differing answers as you've seen already and its not going to keep you happy.
Sorry if you don't find my advice helpful, but I've managed to find the ROM I like and the kernel I like by TRYING them. Neither of which have been mentioned in this thread by the way, but I'm not going to say its best for you, because you likely use your phone for different scenarios than me.
If your going to step into the brave world of custom kernels, rooting, roms, themes, mods etc the best thing you can do - and I say this genuinely, and meaning to be helpful - is to read up on said things and try the ones you like the sound of and you trust to be safe.
veyka said:
Photos live wallpaper etc would be more of a rom thing, than a kernel thing.
As far as best or what have you kernel, there is no best, i find ninphetamine to be good, you may not, and this might just end up turning into another thread of generic repetition and general uselessness.
The best way is to try them, as the person above said.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I've been reading good things about ninphetamine. I will give it a try.
veyka said:
Photos live wallpaper etc would be more of a rom thing, than a kernel thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't this be GPU related? Do you think apps like Chainfire3D or Overclocking free (GPU/CPU) would fix it?
Hi guys i know already properly alot of people have asked this question but what is the best rom to use on galaxy s2.
I just upgraded and got me the galaxy s2 over the sensation and i am loving it so far..But would like to find out what rom out there is best to use on a daily basis. So if anyone has any recommendations i would appreciate it
No best rom try them is the simple answer yet again.
If their was a best rom then their would only be one rom .
I know this answer has been given many many times but its the answer .
jje
The best rom is the one you like the best. Now get flashing.
I voided my warranty and your mum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1244535&highlight=Best+ROM
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1235592&highlight=Best+ROM
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1223402&highlight=Best+ROM
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1223833&highlight=Best+ROM
ithehappy said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1244535&highlight=Best+ROM
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1235592&highlight=Best+ROM
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1223402&highlight=Best+ROM
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1223833&highlight=Best+ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
undervolting has a lot to do with battery life. especially ask laptop owners with core 2 duo's what undervolting does. don't spread false information because you're not impressed or it didn't meet your expectations.
pukemon said:
undervolting has a lot to do with battery life. especially ask laptop owners with core 2 duo's what undervolting does. don't spread false information because you're not impressed or it didn't meet your expectations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you don't need to spread your non sense here!
lmao. half your posts lately have been undervolting is worthless. you don't even know what you're talking about and that is non sense in and of itself.
pukemon said:
lmao. half your posts lately have been undervolting is worthless. you don't even know what you're talking about and that is non sense in and of itself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I am not wasting anymore post behind a freak and non sense like you. So say whatever story you have in bag, at least it will make you happy.
Way.....
ithehappy said:
Well I am not wasting anymore post behind a freak and non sense like you. So say whatever story you have in bag, at least it will make you happy.
Way.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your untruthful signature makes it a topic every time you post.....
*** "Undervolting has absolutely nothing to do with your battery life. It's as simple as that. " ***
Matriak31 said:
Hi guys i know already properly alot of people have asked this question but what is the best rom to use on galaxy s2.
I just upgraded and got me the galaxy s2 over the sensation and i am loving it so far..But would like to find out what rom out there is best to use on a daily basis. So if anyone has any recommendations i would appreciate it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can try litening rom its quite good.
madroxx said:
you can try litening rom its quite good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you i appreciate that. i will give it a go thank you
can you change kernels once you are on a custom rom or is always best to go by the one that comes with the rom
Matriak31 said:
can you change kernels once you are on a custom rom or is always best to go by the one that comes with the rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya you can change the kernal of ur choice there is no rule that you have to use the kernal that comes with the rom. you can try speedmods kernal if you want battery life is your priority or go for ninphetamine kernel if you want OC/UV.
So far I found VillainROM + SpeedMod kernel giving me the best battery life, might even be better with undervolting and Black Android theme, but since this ROM doesn't support undervolting and I love my current theme, I haven't tried them.
Just my RM 0.02
Fulvian said:
So far I found VillainROM + SpeedMod kernel giving me the best battery life, might even be better with undervolting and Black Android theme, but since this ROM doesn't support undervolting and I love my current theme, I haven't tried them.
Just my RM 0.02
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
right im using Villainrom and using Nimp kernel 2.0.5. i have put my frequencies on setcpu max 1000GHz and minimum 200.. what i always want to know how can you undervolt a rom
hi im new in this of O.C. But i think we need a Overclock Undervolt Kernel for this Great smartphone <galaxy s 2> i've been testing some Europe Kernel but dont work home and back soft keys. After i test in a Quadrant i get score 4550 very good for this kernel but we need a full comptabible kernel for sgh-I777 someone make Please
Thanks!!!
wow, you need to be patient and not push these devs. they're doing what they can and if/when one is ready, they'll release it. And please do not compare quadrant scores....
pretty sure this thread does NOT belong in development, unless the OP is going to develop it.
yeahh i know i only want to see this phone flying so soon but we need to wait>>
Thanks for your opinion
NOT development.
The phone has only been out for a few days, there are a hell of a lot more important things to do kernel-wise than overclock/undervolt.
I'll be working on undervolt soon, but you'll likely never see overclock from me. Quadrant scores mean nothing, and the stability tradeoff of overclocking isn't worth it unless you're gaming. I never overclock, and I don't release features with a high likelihood of breaking things unless I've tested them.
Last but not least, asking in a pushy way as this is usually a good way to put your request at the bottom of someone's priority list.
Read the sticky Thread closed.
so before i say anything i AM NOT bashing any devs.
my question is.. do the devs and community really think once we get the ics ota and source we will really get any "decent" custom kernels that may help with overheating and or battery life on the rezound?
the reason im asking is, we have GB and source and the two kernels that ive seen still don't really give a huge battery life boost. other than ziggy, which i haven't seen around here at all lately who is fluent with building & messing with kernels?
i guess the same question could be asked of cm9. we would still need some sort of custom aosp kernel built, right?
mighty_markus12 said:
so before i say anything i AM NOT bashing any devs.
my question is.. do the devs and community really think once we get the ics ota and source we will really get any "decent" custom kernels that may help with overheating and or battery life on the rezound?
the reason im asking is, we have GB and source and the two kernels that ive seen still don't really give a huge battery life boost. other than ziggy, which i haven't seen around here at all lately who is fluent with building & messing with kernels?
i guess the same question could be asked of cm9. we would still need some sort of custom aosp kernel built, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm almost completely sure we don't have any kernel source yet, GB or ICS. So, they would actually have to release the source for us to make any major changes to the kernels.
Nope, wrong. I remember the source for GB getting released a while back. NVM. I would think that we could see better kernels one ICS source is released. I don't really see why we wouldn't, but I see what you're saying since most of the GB kernels still aren't amazing. Good, yes, just not perfect.
WasabiWa83 said:
I'm almost completely sure we don't have any kernel source yet, GB or ICS. So, they would actually have to release the source for us to make any major changes to the kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
didn't know that, thanks.
mighty_markus12 said:
didn't know that, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I edited my post. I do remember now that they released the source in November or something. I just think that we might need more involvement from devs who do a lot with kernels. Hopefully a bunch of them jump to this phone once S-Off is achieved and ICS is released.
mighty_markus12 said:
so before i say anything i AM NOT bashing any devs.
my question is.. do the devs and community really think once we get the ics ota and source we will really get any "decent" custom kernels that may help with overheating and or battery life on the rezound?
the reason im asking is, we have GB and source and the two kernels that ive seen still don't really give a huge battery life boost. other than ziggy, which i haven't seen around here at all lately who is fluent with building & messing with kernels?
i guess the same question could be asked of cm9. we would still need some sort of custom aosp kernel built, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know you're all hot for AOSP, but a kernel isn't gonna do it without RIL.
tspderek said:
i know you're all hot for AOSP, but a kernel isn't gonna do it without RIL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im asking about kernels in general.
I suspect the kernel devs are waiting for source before putting it in high gear.
I know Incredikernel wad fantastic on the Incredible, and I get decent battery life with it on the Rezound (uses about 50% on the standard battery over an 8 hour work day with texting, push rmail, and browsing).
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
LunaticSerenade said:
I know Incredikernel wad fantastic on the Incredible, and I get decent battery life with it on the Rezound (uses about 50% on the standard battery over an 8 hour work day with texting, push rmail, and browsing).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, Incredikernel has worked very well for me battery wise (besides being the ONLY kernel that will run for weeks at a time without rebooting).
I would suspect HTC will fix the current issue with the ICS kernel running at 100% with screen on before anything is released. Kind of surprised we haven't had any more leaks lately actually.
mighty_markus12 said:
so before i say anything i AM NOT bashing any devs.
my question is.. do the devs and community really think once we get the ics ota and source we will really get any "decent" custom kernels that may help with overheating and or battery life on the rezound?
the reason im asking is, we have GB and source and the two kernels that ive seen still don't really give a huge battery life boost. other than ziggy, which i haven't seen around here at all lately who is fluent with building & messing with kernels?
i guess the same question could be asked of cm9. we would still need some sort of custom aosp kernel built, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are like a damn cockier spaniel... In the CM9 dev thread, you said the devs aren't working hard enough. Here, you're implying they're not smart enough to do what YOU want (which is very important here, you very clearly are only concerned with YOU getting AOSP/AOKP/CM9). Why the hell do you have to annoy everyone with your constant begging and inflammatory questions?
Here's a better way to get what you want: "What do the devs think the likelihood of getting custom kernels with better battery life is when we get the ICS kernel source?" See... no mention of work you personally found to be deficient... no condescending implications... just a simple question asking for information... but no... instead you're running around like moron trying get what YOU want RIGHT F*****G NOW and leaving a burning trail of insults on the way...
Please... just go away. I'm not a Rezound dev, but so many of your posts insult me on their behalf...
theascended said:
You are like a damn cockier spaniel... In the CM9 dev thread, you said the devs aren't working hard enough. Here, you're implying they're not smart enough to do what YOU want (which is very important here, you very clearly are only concerned with YOU getting AOSP/AOKP/CM9). Why the hell do you have to annoy everyone with your constant begging and inflammatory questions?
Here's a better way to get what you want: "What do the devs think the likelihood of getting custom kernels with better battery life is when we get the ICS kernel source?" See... no mention of work you personally found to be deficient... no condescending implications... just a simple question asking for information... but no... instead you're running around like moron trying get what YOU want RIGHT F*****G NOW and leaving a burning trail of insults on the way...
Please... just go away. I'm not a Rezound dev, but so many of your posts insult me on their behalf...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go troll somewhere else, this was a valid question. you need to quit sucking on the pacifier and thinking every question asked means were bashing a dev. apparently you cannot read the first few words on my initial post.
I'm not trying to insult you... but...
You are one of the slowest, most retarded, internet pseudonerds I've ever had the displeasure of reading typed vomit from. You're either 12 years old living in some fantasy that you're somehow smarter or better than the rest of us or 42 and living in your mom's basement (my former comment still applies).
But I'm not trying to insult you... Simply prefixing an insulting post with a disclaimer that its not insulting doesn't actually ameliorate the fact that you're insulting everyone you meet.
Edit: also, calling someone a troll... really? If you like, I can spend the next week trolling you and I'd bet the XDA admins would let me given how condescending you are to everyone.
theascended said:
I'm not trying to insult you... but...
You are one of the slowest, most retarded, internet pseudonerds I've ever had the displeasure of reading typed vomit from. You're either 12 years old living in some fantasy that you're somehow smarter or better than the rest of us or 42 and living in your mom's basement (my former comment still applies).
But I'm not trying to insult you... Simply prefixing an insulting post with a disclaimer that its not insulting doesn't actually ameliorate the fact that you're insulting everyone you meet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i guess striving for more options is all the sudden a bad thing in the android world.
I didn't find your first post bad in any way seemed like a general question not directed at anyone. I also didn't see any of the other people that responded to it say anything about it being bad either.
Sent from my ICS Rezound
Yes, if and when kernel source is released we will have some really nice custom sense kernels.
There are some kernel devs that will be building kernels for the rezound once source drops. I don't know what kind of phone you had before, but custom kernels can MAKE a huge difference in a phones performance. A custom kernel properly dialed can have really large improvements in performance as well as battery life. I suspect that once the rezound has custom kernels available we will battery life almost double on properly dialed in phones.
I"m a fairly heavy user, and I was pulling about 32 - 35 hours out of an extended battery on my Thunderbolt, with an overclock at 1.7 or 1.8. I don't freeze or uninstall system apps or anything like that, it was just with the options that I don't use disabled.
This wasn't at launch, it was like the rezound, it's a process of evolution and imoyeson was always tweaking and improving things with each version, testing new ideas, implementing or removing features that did good or bad, etc...
The rezound will be like that too, but I think we will see a more drastic improvement earlier in the game.
This thread made me lol.
LakerStar25 said:
I didn't find your first post bad in any way seemed like a general question not directed at anyone. I also didn't see any of the other people that responded to it say anything about it being bad either.
Sent from my ICS Rezound
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It just seems every question i ask gets turned around into im bashing a dev which im not.
mighty_markus12 said:
It just seems every question i ask gets turned around into im bashing a dev which im not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Understand I'm not trying to be mean or anything, but I think its because you mention AOSP in like every single possible thread and eventually it comes across as nothing more than complaining that we don't have AOSP yet. We all agree with you, we all want AOSP too... and soon! ...But there's only so many times you can hear the same thing before it becomes annoying. You keep re-iterating the same thing over and over again as if we aren't capable of understanding how much you want AOSP - but trust me, we get it!
a.mcdear said:
Understand I'm not trying to be mean or anything, but I think its because you mention AOSP in like every single possible thread and eventually it comes across as nothing more than complaining that we don't have AOSP yet. We all agree with you, we all want AOSP too... and soon! ...But there's only so many times you can hear the same thing before it becomes annoying. You keep re-iterating the same thing over and over again as if we aren't capable of understanding how much you want AOSP - but trust me, we get it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other than this thread wasnt about aosp. I was asking about source and lack of kernels. But i get your point.
If yall have a problem with him then you have two good options.
1. Shut up and let him be
2. Talk to a mod
Confronting him isn't going to stop anything, if you have learned anything from the internet its this, bashing someone is always going to.make them speak up, because of the fact that there is no consequences
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5