4.4.2 graphics drivers to 4.3 - Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Anyone knows if there is a way to put the drivers of the 4.4.2 to 4.3 so we can have better benchmark scores?

greddyrx7 said:
Anyone knows if there is a way to put the drivers of the 4.4.2 to 4.3 so we can have better benchmark scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you want 4.4.2 drivers on 4.3 other then benchmark scores?
Simply use KitKat?
And who really cares about benchmark scores on a 2 year old device?

Getting higher benchmark scores mean very little. It was stated that Samsung had implemented functionality in the firmware that would give preference to benchmarking apps and increase performance to enable higher scores. It proves very little to be honest. You notice performance in day to day activities.

Related

[Q] How benchmarks fared on HC ?

anyone tried benchmarks on honeycomb...? please share some results.... that will help all decide to update to HC or not on performance grounds....
thnx
Which benchmarks. Will depend if user is running a rom
mcord11758 said:
Which benchmarks. Will depend if user is running a rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
general ones quadrant, linpack ,pi ,antutu , browsermark and others... i was asking about official rom HC 3.2.1
benchmark
I ran the Quadrant app. dont know much about it, guess I did it correctly- I ran the full benchmark and my device scored 2096. I've ran it 3 times, each time it scores between 1900-2000 range. my device is a stock View 4G upgraded to Honeycomb through system updates. I updated over wifi, I don't have a sprint data plan. hope this helps-
Quadrant is same as it was on GB interesting!!! 3D n 2D benchmark scores on GB were quite low... i guess honeycomb wont affect these thing these r mainly depend on GPU n processor...
there will b just marginal difference...
With Nenemark2 i get 23-25 fps on Honeycomb
GB it was around 12-14 fps
Vellamo between 850-1100 - dont remember GB results
I would ask you not to mention specific ROMs
When the HD2 came out, the first months it was all about benchmark results...
There were ROM ranking lists based on benchmarks... but the comunity realized fast this was pure bull**** so it stopped after a while
Cooks optimized only for specfic benchmarks to get on top casue people started looking only at results... which often had nothin to do wit real life performance
Flyer.michael said:
With Nenemark2 i get 23-25 fps on Honeycomb
GB it was around 12-14 fps
Vellamo between 850-1100 - dont remember GB results
I would ask you not to mention specific ROMs
When the HD2 came out, the first months it was all about benchmark results...
There were ROM ranking lists based on benchmarks... but the comunity realized fast this was pure bull**** so it stopped after a while
Cooks optimized only for specfic benchmarks to get on top casue people started looking only at results... which often had nothin to do wit real life performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
after reading thing i might move to honeycomb .... so we get improved graphics perfomance.....
and vellamo was 820 on GB...
so flyer was under powered with GB...
i heard 1.5 ghz processor was also under powered so i guess bechmark pi will also give better result...
thanx man please test some more on HC... antutu gave a bad score with GB

Consistantly low benchmark scores. Antutu & Quadrant

Here is my issue, i decided to randomly run quadrant and found out i had bad results.
Around 3000, i had very low memory and i/o scores, memory being 2000 and i/o around 5000. I then flashed speedmod kernel and got even lower results, 2811 quadrant and 1500 memory, which is far from the default expected values. This happened in GB whith checrom V6 and Siyah Kerner, CM9 and SlimICS with both speedmod and fluxx kernel.
Antutu scores are lower then 6000 ranging from 4900 with SlimICS 5400 with GB and 5300 with CM9, i got back to Slim and cleared cache and got 5900, but quandrant still was performing poorly
You shouldn't rely on quadrant scores to decide whether the ROM is good or not, you should make that judgement for yourself. Sometimes, developers of ROMs make tweaks to purposely increase the quadrant scores.
Casterina said:
You shouldn't rely on quadrant scores to decide whether the ROM is good or not, you should make that judgement for yourself. Sometimes, developers of ROMs make tweaks to purposely increase the quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just trying to see if there was something wrong with my phone. Not that i would keep the highest numbered ROM. That's why i got worried, the scores were low in almost all of them
Really want to test, flash stock rom and see the numbers flying
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
you can try using different kernels with different cpu governors to see a difference in benchmarks.
Bench marking and quadrant scores are for *******.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Basic problem is benchmarks vary from one run to another and are not reliable .
jje
Will a higher score change the way you use your phone?
What difference do the scores mean? Does it make your phone unuseable when you get a lower score? What answers are you hoping to get?
Dont use benchmarks....they arent needed, we already know our phone is fast...just use the phone and enjoy it
mattyh77 said:
Bench marking and quadrant scores are for *******.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmao
Its all relative to the rom you're using. CM9 I found scored lower on benchmarks, but on real life usage people report better performance
CM7 scored higher for me then stock based GB roms, quite comfortably. So that was the other way round.
However, WanamLite ICS which im using now scores between 6200 and 6300 for me, highest being 6330.
Again its all very relative to the rom you're using. If you're really that bothered flash a stock based ICS rom, run some benchmarks, see the higher values, get content, then either stick or go back to CM based roms with whatever wisdom you've aquired!
By the way all the above was using Antutu.

[Q] ROM to increase benchmark

I was just wondering if anyone knows a ROM that increases the quadrant Benchmark for the S3. I have a S2 and its currently scoring better than my S3. It may be the cpu tuner app?? PLease let me know.
psac said:
I was just wondering if anyone knows a ROM that increases the quadrant Benchmark for the S3. I have a S2 and its currently scoring better than my S3. It may be the cpu tuner app?? PLease let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost any custom ROM increases it because it contains tweaks and mods. Just browse the S III forum and pick the ROM you like most.

Lg g2 D802 stock KitKat impact on benchmarks

Hello all , i create this thread to discuss the impact of the KitKat 4.4.2 on our phones , for me it was a disaster , my G2 was lag free score always more than 36000pts on antutu and more than 20000 on quadrant , now with 4.4.2 i get only 28000 pts on antutu and 17000 on quadrant .
AND YOU ?
Same here...only quadrant 21126.
Send from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
dont know why ...
gabilondo said:
Same here...only quadrant 21126.
Send from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have another G2 Korean version F320S same issue 28000 on antutu ...., and both D802 and F320S lag time to time ... i dont know why
Mine doesn't lag but antutu score is really affected.Before kitkat 36540,after 28000.Quadrant score is the same before and after update.
Trimis de pe al meu LG-D802 folosind Tapatalk
gabilondo said:
Mine doesn't lag but antutu score is really affected.Before kitkat 36540,after 28000.Quadrant score is the same before and after update.
Trimis de pe al meu LG-D802 folosind Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when you power on and you try to type your PIN it dosnt lag little when you click the numbers ? im asking coz i have the same lag in both versions !
I never use pin code,sorry..
Trimis de pe al meu LG-D802 folosind Tapatalk
HoussaMON said:
when you power on and you try to type your PIN it dosnt lag little when you click the numbers ? im asking coz i have the same lag in both versions !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure if there would be a difference, but i'm on d801 (t-mobile). i don't see any lag with either JB or KK
pitchdarkice said:
not sure if there would be a difference, but i'm on d801 (t-mobile). i don't see any lag with either JB or KK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i had no lag on JB but i have some with KK on both versions , can you share with us your benchmark scores ?
All benchmarks are affected by kitkat, but it doesn't indicate the lags/smoothness
I tested all kk roms including CM ones. Now i'm on not official for my phone kk from vodafone (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2664933) and it's all the same. These are my scores : Antutu 25000-27000 and Quadrant 16000-17000. Usualy in Antutu i got 31000 on PA kitkat. And with stock 422 i got 34700. In Quadrant i got 20000-21000 on stock 422. But i think there might be an issue with Quadrant and Antutu, because on 3dmark everything is up the roof(pics), Ice Storm - maxed out, Ice Storm Extreme - maxed out, and Ice Storm Unlimited 17127.
GraphMusic said:
All benchmarks are affected by kitkat, but it doesn't indicate the lags/smoothness
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been running the 4.4.2 since yesterday and besides the lack of root, I really think the update solves most of the strange lag in lg stock launcher. Also apps open up much faster, eg. facebook before had a 1-2 second lag before showing the ui, now its like 700 ms and updating the feed is also much snappier.
Antutu gives med 33.000 which is more or less the same as on 4.2.2 stock.
D802 32 gb international here, running 4.4.2 Verizon branded kdz taken from the links here on xda.
HoussaMON said:
i had no lag on JB but i have some with KK on both versions , can you share with us your benchmark scores ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hate when people with low knowledge on how android or benchmarks work start thread.It's a disaster for your phone to be more responsive with lower benchmarks?Instead it's a disaster when ur phone is less responsive with higher benchmarks that smokes every other companies' device.These are some threads I wish the mods burn no even delete.Benchmarks NEVER EXPLAIN REAL LIFE PERFORMANCE!How many times should noobs here this!Even devs like @faux123 and @maxwen tell u how a kernel can be optimized to come in with much power when the user needs it and not when the user isn't and their kernels score less benchmark performances and greater performance + battery life than stock kernels for all the devices they've worked with.Benchmarks can't be read by individual scores alone.Did u check the i/o,single core and other unique performances in your benchmarking app.Btw OEMs do learn how to cheat on benchmarks after their first updates so wait for an OTA with "bug fixes" which means benchmark cheats incoming if u want higher benchmarks!
hackarchive said:
I hate when people with low knowledge on how android or benchmarks work start thread.It's a disaster for your phone to be more responsive with lower benchmarks?Instead it's a disaster when ur phone is less responsive with higher benchmarks that smokes every other companies' device.These are some threads I wish the mods burn no even delete.Benchmarks NEVER EXPLAIN REAL LIFE PERFORMANCE!How many times should noobs here this!Even devs like @faux123 and @maxwen tell u how a kernel can be optimized to come in with much power when the user needs it and not when the user isn't and their kernels score less benchmark performances and greater performance + battery life than stock kernels for all the devices they've worked with.Benchmarks can't be read by individual scores alone.Did u check the i/o,single core and other unique performances in your benchmarking app.Btw OEMs do learn how to cheat on benchmarks after their first updates so wait for an OTA with "bug fixes" which means benchmark cheats incoming if u want higher benchmarks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
an i hate when a "HALF-GEEK" start his bla bla bla BLU without reading , all what you said we know it ! but when we talk benchmarks we mean smothness not only scores , and my PHONES ARE LESS RESPONSIVE WITH kitkat I HAVE LAGS ON BOTH VERSIONS ,that why i starts this thread! i have multitask : 4730 CPU Integer : 1532 storage I/O 1622 Database I/O 589 bla bla bla so please ... if you cant discuss and respect others and if you dont like a thread no one oblige you to participate .
great!!!!
Alexzander said:
I tested all kk roms including CM ones. Now i'm on not official for my phone kk from vodafone (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2664933) and it's all the same. These are my scores : Antutu 25000-27000 and Quadrant 16000-17000. Usualy in Antutu i got 31000 on PA kitkat. And with stock 422 i got 34700. In Quadrant i got 20000-21000 on stock 422. But i think there might be an issue with Quadrant and Antutu, because on 3dmark everything is up the roof(pics), Ice Storm - maxed out, Ice Storm Extreme - maxed out, and Ice Storm Unlimited 17127.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you didnt notice any irresponsiveness/lag ?
HoussaMON said:
you didnt notice any irresponsiveness/lag ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No lag so far . Everything is butter smooth. But i didn't have time to test the gps yet.
HoussaMON said:
i had no lag on JB but i have some with KK on both versions , can you share with us your benchmark scores ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 27958 on antutu and 17522 on quadrant, so the benchmark numbers haven't correlated to the quicker responsiveness
I don't bother with benchmarks but I can tell you my phone feels exponentially faster and more responsive. Everything just feels smoother.
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
So overall their is a actual performance improvement in KitKat?
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I don't really care about the benchmarks... Kit kat so smooth... Put's jelly bean to total shame...
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda app-developers app

How someone got this score on antutu.

hey have look at this screenshot..!
The person that provided me this screenshot said that he is developing a new kernel.
But then i saw the score not validated as it was red but then he said would release the kernel to select users and also he said he will be making a video on the kernel highlights.
But how did he attain such high scores???
Holy crap how is that even possible ? Who is this magician ? It doesn't look like overclock , CPU score is less important than our actual values (24000 for 1804 + 1440 MHz)
Need some explanation but wow , wait &see
ol I got almost 100k once on old guyver kernel + eu miui dev with kernel tweaks and heavy debloat on my 2GB ram model k3nzo
but thats the reason I dont trust this benchmark...
Ok so i contacted the guy named Riju and he said his work would take another week to compare before releasing it to the public.
He also mentions the support for nougat rooms and mm miui roms, quick charge 3.0,improved battery performance and better graphics with vulkan api stork
I got higher scores in 3D, CPU and RAM, BUT...UX? Wtf?
Sebaskyclad said:
I got higher scores in 3D, CPU and RAM, BUT...UX? Wtf?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How you got this freaking benchmark?!? I've never got more than 84k! Please tell me what is your setup!
Carlocarnev2000 said:
How you got this freaking benchmark?!? I've never got more than 84k! Please tell me what is your setup!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got ~88k with AICP Nougat + Radon (stock settings) + F2FS. Nothing more.
Carlocarnev2000 said:
How you got this freaking benchmark?!? I've never got more than 84k! Please tell me what is your setup!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using new LineageOS unofficial (7.1.1), nothing special, stock radon settings(3.4), only set the governor to Impulse.
This totally insane!!
Antutu 6.0.1 could be easily used to have a good score I don't know how, but it's in link with the kernel... I could go to 120K with guyver kernel ... but it's bug is just with antutu 6.0.1
https://youtu.be/uOlOSbLp-J8?list=PLyjrOYSiemcuTICj-NBeqHHXqXuukSoIa
antutu is not a good way to judge device performance.
this score is complete bs... this version of antutu can be manipulated to have this high of a score. tell this kernel creator to run a new benchmark using the latest antutu version and see how it fares.
I flash Vulkan API and android N blobs for SD650, got 86k, if overclock might near 100k, but that's too high in the image.
AIDA screenshot for Vulkan API proof.
Lol no updates yet
Kernel release?
sent from Base
does numbers really matter? i highly doubt there's a noticeable difference in performance between this guy's score and the typical benchmark score of our phones.
drckml said:
does numbers really matter? i highly doubt there's a noticeable difference in performance between this guy's score and the typical benchmark score of our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance will feel better for sure. Battery life, system stability, product life and thermals will suffer though. Which do you find more important is the real question I guess.
but why do u want this score overclocking means higher risk of damage an just getting 20000 more wont do any wonders, apps incompatible will stay like that. It is a great phone which in my opinion dosent need overclocking atleast for now.

Categories

Resources