Related
Anyone have the apk for the non-verizon version?
I hate the one Verizon forces you to use. It says in the market "This item is not available on your carrier"
David9723 said:
Anyone have the apk for the non-verizon version?
I hate the one Verizon forces you to use. It says in the market "This item is not available on your carrier"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty sure that no one has been able to figure out how to crack the newer versions. And the old versions won't open, make you update. So I guess you are out of luck.
How dare verizon expect you to be a verizon customer to use something that they paid millions for the exclusive on...
There is no non Verizon version. The NFL mobile app is a Verizon exclusive and I even had to put my verizon online user name and password in to use it when I dl it on my rezound
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
josephms89 said:
There is no non Verizon version. The NFL mobile app is a Verizon exclusive and I even had to put my verizon online user name and password in to use it when I dl it on my rezound
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is incorrect as I had the NORMAL NFL app (don't think it was called NFL mobile just NFL) for my old incredible S in tmobile. As with the original poster I don't think we get that one. Maybe if you get the apk from somewhere else and try to install it may work.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
jim_0068 said:
This is incorrect as I had the NORMAL NFL app (don't think it was called NFL mobile just NFL) for my old incredible S in tmobile. As with the original poster I don't think we get that one. Maybe if you get the apk from somewhere else and try to install it may work.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope, pretty sure the OP means the cracked verizon one to make it work on other carriers. They were able to do this last year, but verizon kept updating it, making the old ones update before they would work, and eventually people got tired of trying to crack it.
nrfitchett4 said:
nope, pretty sure the OP means the cracked verizon one to make it work on other carriers. They were able to do this last year, but verizon kept updating it, making the old ones update before they would work, and eventually people got tired of trying to crack it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying be difficult but the OP says non-verizon version, not a cracked one of the verizon version.
As I said this was/is available for non-verizon phones as I had in on my Incredible S using tmobile.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
jim_0068 said:
Not trying be difficult but the OP says non-verizon version, not a cracked one of the verizon version.
As I said this was/is available for non-verizon phones as I had in on my Incredible S using tmobile.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just googled t mobile nfl app and got a bunch of links for cracked verizon apps that used to work. I could find nothing about any t mobile nfl app. Think you just had a cracked version of the verizon app. Verizon pays millions to have that exclusive with the nfl.
nrfitchett4 said:
I just googled t mobile nfl app and got a bunch of links for cracked verizon apps that used to work. I could find nothing about any t mobile nfl app. Think you just had a cracked version of the verizon app. Verizon pays millions to have that exclusive with the nfl.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wasn't a tmobile specific app, it was simply a NFL official app for all non-verizon customers. I'll see if I can take a photo of the app on a friends phone.
All the app did was show scores and allows you to follow along play by play similar to the espn app.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Ah, ok then. Merry Xmas
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk
Its expiring any loopholes? Lol
Sent from my Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk
You do realize that this is prohibited on xda, right?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
najaboy said:
You do realize that this is prohibited on xda, right?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to cause trouble but how is that any different then the Tether Hack?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2305118
That's an interesting point made. While certainly not apples to apples... the tethering hacks are 'stealing' from the carrier, just as warez 'steals' from the developers.
\
bkhorn said:
Not to cause trouble but how is that any different then the Tether Hack?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2305118
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The tether hack is merely a t&c violation which is in a gray area. While there are those that abuse it, many folks using it actually use less data than those of us on tiered plans. There exists an argument that they are already paying for the data that they are using.
Conversely, what the op is looking for is theft of a paid subscription service, and is not a t&c violation. There is no gray area- it's a paid service for any and all who use itbeyond the trial.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Personally they are both almost the same. Tether plan costs higher than the caller ID plan though. Lol
Sent from my Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk
This is a interesting line and a good point to bring up. As I understand where both parties are coming from. Tether is also a paid service so is this caller iD app. To me it falls under the same category... Fine line idk?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
Root and remove the APK?
Disable the app from Settings / Applications?
gotroot801 said:
Root and remove the APK?
Disable the app from Settings / Applications?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The op wants to know if there's a way to bypass the subscription
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
I froze this app but I'm still getting full caller ID info. It's been two weeks since I got my phone.
Is it possible that freezing the app prevented this from getting shut off after the trial somehow?
jimmiem said:
I froze this app but I'm still getting full caller ID info. It's been two weeks since I got my phone.
Is it possible that freezing the app prevented this from getting shut off after the trial somehow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's weird still is that I liked the trial enough to purchase it for $3/month. I get alot of calls and realized how nice it was to know what company was calling, etc, when they have multiple numbers that they dial out from. I installed a new ROM which was debloated and it didn't have the app; I tried searching for the apps name to download it again, just to have what I'm paying for but couldn't find it. Without the app, I still get full caller id info, just no options to add it to my contacts. I realized it must be getting turned on @ Verizon, since they are billing me for the services.
This leads me to believe the app is just for adding contacts etc, so I'm guessing that "IF SOMEONE WAS SEARCHING FOR A H**K", which violates xda rules, that its probably pointless. I decided its just another $3/month, which is worth it and cheaper then a landline caller ID service.
I'm a Nurse, not a hacker or developer ( which I know are completely different things ) so this is JUST MY EDUCATED GUESS
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 11:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:52 PM ----------
If anyone could upload the app for me, I would greatly appreciate it. I know I can just download a stock ROM, that's not debloated and grab it, but thats a 2 hour download of 1.2gigs, just for the app since I can't locate the same app anywhere I've looked; and yes I HAVE SEARCHED FOR IT.
THANK YOU !!!
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Tada10 said:
Personally they are both almost the same. Tether plan costs higher than the caller ID plan though. Lol
Sent from my Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you being double charged for caller id? The people using the tether hack are already paying for their data.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
najaboy said:
Are you being double charged for caller id? The people using the tether hack are already paying for their data.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If on unlimited data, paying for data only and tethering for free isn't an option from VZW. It's their policy whether we like it or not. I hate it but I pay for it.
Mayze23 said:
If on unlimited data, paying for data only and tethering for free isn't an option from VZW. It's their policy whether we like it or not. I hate it but I pay for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I concur which is why I'm on a share everything plan. I tetheroccasionally anddon't usemore than8 GB a monthBergen all of our devices. Verizon is legally obligated to provide it to tiered customers at no extra charge, but still hits customers on the legacy unlimited plan with the fee.
That being said, is there a realistic difference between a customer who is on a tiered 4 GB plan who tethers and one who is on an unlimited plan who uses 3GB a month including occasionally tethering a tablet? Verizon's justificationto the FCC is that there exists the "potential" for unlimited customers to use a large amount of data.
As I've said, it amounts to a mere t&c violation for using their already paid for data in a manner that Verizon has said that is free only if they pay for less data.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
jimmiem said:
I froze this app but I'm still getting full caller ID info. It's been two weeks since I got my phone.
Is it possible that freezing the app prevented this from getting shut off after the trial somehow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here.
najaboy said:
I concur which is why I'm on a share everything plan. I tetheroccasionally anddon't usemore than8 GB a monthBergen all of our devices. Verizon is legally obligated to provide it to tiered customers at no extra charge, but still hits customers on the legacy unlimited plan with the fee.
That being said, is there a realistic difference between a customer who is on a tiered 4 GB plan who tethers and one who is on an unlimited plan who uses 3GB a month including occasionally tethering a tablet? Verizon's justificationto the FCC is that there exists the "potential" for unlimited customers to use a large amount of data.
As I've said, it amounts to a mere t&c violation for using their already paid for data in a manner that Verizon has said that is free only if they pay for less data.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's actually a pretty strong legal argument that they can't charge extra for tethering to anyone, but that is off topic here.
Also, violating a contract is not illegal (i.e. criminal) or in my opinion, immoral. Theft of service is...and that is what we are talking about here.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
brizey said:
There's actually a pretty strong legal argument that they can't charge extra for tethering to anyone, but that is off topic here.
Also, violating a contract is not illegal (i.e. criminal) or in my opinion, immoral. Theft of service is...and that is what we are talking about here.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, since the topic of this thread is verboten, we may as well go with the tangent...
I suspect you're going in the direction of the Block C restriction. The FCC has expressly given Verizon the green light to charge unlimited customers for tethering in the consent decree that was issued last summer.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
jimmiem said:
I froze this app but I'm still getting full caller ID info. It's been two weeks since I got my phone.
Is it possible that freezing the app prevented this from getting shut off after the trial somehow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I froze it with Rom Toolbox Pro hope it works lol thanks
Sent from my Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk
Discovered thread City Caller ID (free old app - same as payware CityID)
I discovered old thread in HTC Droid Incredible forums about this.
City Caller ID (free old app - same as payware CityID)
brizey said:
There's actually a pretty strong legal argument that they can't charge extra for tethering to anyone, but that is off topic here.
Also, violating a contract is not illegal (i.e. criminal) or in my opinion, immoral. Theft of service is...and that is what we are talking about here.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree.....all you're doing is turning you're phone into a router to use the data that you're already receiving to the phone. A theft of service would apply that you are receiving additional data, which you are not....... you're pulling the same data to you're phone regardless its in tethering mode or not
Winning. I was able to get an Advanced Tech support rep to admit they were wrong. She walked me through rooting my phone and voiding my warranty to freeze Carrier IQ. She then added insurance to my account free of charge and gave me a credit for $150 on my account to cover the insurance deductible if needed in the future. Attached is proof.
This has turned into a full on assault toward AT&T. Here is the link to file a complaint to the FCC. I have submitted my contract, the details page about the lg g2 from AT&T's website neither which states that carrier IQ or any other software is installed to monitor location or network data. Also attach was a chat log with an AT&T rep who admitted openly that it was not in my contract or listed anywhere that carrier IQ would be installed on our devices.I have also Filed a small claims complaint in with my local court which has a 500$ maximum claim amount. I am seeking the max with the reasoning that the only way to not be affected is to buy another phone.I expect AT&T to be a no show. Please unite and file an fcc complaint for concealing software capable of providing your location without consent.
https://esupport.fcc.gov/ccmsforms/form2000.action?form_type=2000B
Here is the facebook link. I need to do more work to it when I get time. https://www.facebook.com/supportpacs
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
Posted this to the official lg mobile USA page.
LG. I must say since I picked up the g2 life has been great. I have but one issue with my phone and I am on my knees begging you for help. My troubles all began when I powered on my at&t branded device. I struggled with a very annoying wake lock that would randomly deplete my battery. I have traced the culprit which I have found to be carrier iq also known as ciq. I understand this spyware was installed at the request of my carrier so they can track usage data and trouble shoot network issues. I just feel lg should allow customers to have the ability to opt out or disable this software. Did you know that if I have network location set to off carrier iq will turn on my GPS to obtain my location. Now imagine this, you work in a secure facility with metal doors and no windows in the basement of a government entity. Your GPS turns on constantly without your control eating away at your battery trying to obtain a location. So I ask you only for this lg. Please work with the American carriers to give your customers the freedom to choose. Isn't it bad enough we have Obama and the NSA spying on us. Sincerly Christopher
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
If you are talking about US models, the T-mobile variant allows you to disable carrierIQ in the settings.
Intub8 said:
I doubt it will do any good but I wanted to share my plea to lg in hopes for an option to disable carrier iq on the US models like AT&T. I know carrier iq Is installed at the request of the carriers but I believe LG will support us if we unite. The voice of one will not be heard. I will be reaching out to lg customers on other devices and carriers far beyond xda. I will keep this post updated with links for Facebook,YouTube and other social networking sites. Please support me as I fight for your freedom to choose weather or not to enable carrier IQ.
I am in the process of creating a Facebook page with the intention of raising awareness for all of the users who have no idea what carrier iq Is.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got my support. Where do I sign?
HeXaLox said:
You got my support. Where do I sign?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can simply share the Facebook page. When I finish it I will post the link. I am factory restoring my pc so probably in the morning. I will also create a web page.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
Got my support too
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk
Save that on Facebook's, I can tell you are a 911 dispatcher.
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
xcaliburpcs said:
Save that on Facebook's, I can tell you are a 911 dispatcher.
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are correct.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
You didn't really say Obama and the NSA spying on us did you? No ciq on my G2!
neugenusis said:
If you are talking about US models, the T-mobile variant allows you to disable carrierIQ in the settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the T-Mobile version, please elaborate. I can't find how to disable that. Thanks
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
This isn't done at the LG level. This is done at the Carrier level.
The Verizon version doesn't even have CIQ.
This would be a plea to the carriers like ATT... and good luck w/ that.
digitard said:
This isn't done at the LG level. This is done at the Carrier level.
The Verizon version doesn't even have CIQ.
This would be a plea to the carriers like ATT... and good luck w/ that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG installed ciq at the request of att. Lg is the one who can pressure att to give us the option to disable it like t mobile.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
Exactly. They installed it at ATT's behest. They don't install it by default. They installed it because it's part of ATT's custom package they load on top of the LG base.
Like all carriers they install their own custom bloat on top of the base, and that was part of ATT's. They're not going to pressure ATT to remove it because it's ATT's call. T-Mo chose to install it, but give a disable option. It's all controlled by the carriers installation package.
If anything it's ATT who needs to be pressured so the 4.4 build doesn't have it bloated in.
Intub8 said:
LG installed ciq at the request of att. Lg is the one who can pressure att to give us the option to disable it like t mobile.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the T-Mobile version but can't find in settings where to disable it. WTH?
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
bigox said:
I have the T-Mobile version but can't find in settings where to disable it. WTH?
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the late reply
Per T-mobile:
Settings > Backup & Reset > Collect diagnostics.... then uncheck "allow diagnostics"
BetterBatteryStats recorded carrierIQ as a wakelock, but after doing the above method, that wakelock was no more.
One gripe I have w this phone is the CIQ. They should at least let us have the option to disable it.
Sent from my G2
bigox said:
I have the T-Mobile version, please elaborate. I can't find how to disable that. Thanks
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
System settings > backup and reset > collect diagnostics and turn it off.
Semantics said:
System settings > backup and reset > collect diagnostics and turn it off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We should rather ask for unlocked bootloader. CIQ can be easily disabled/removed
Does sprint use CIQ?
Sent from my TouchPad using Tapatalk 4
ericdabbs said:
Does sprint use CIQ?
Sent from my TouchPad using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe they do , they discontinued using it after all the lawsuits started.
I installed the my Verizon app from the play store and it randomly asked for root when I wasn't even using it. Obviously I denied it because there is no reason for them to need it. Just a heads up Verizon is looking for people who are rooted. Google doesn't turn up any results that say why they need it. Just a heads up for those who update it.
After speaking with a verizon rep, they stated:
"One of the things the new tools with tell us is if a device is rooted. When doing troubleshooting and in consideration of our warranty guides, it does help us to know if the phone has been rooted. We may ask a user to Factory Reset and go back to the normal software before we can assist them with more advance troubleshooting or be able to send them a warranty replacement."
So apparently they need it to check if you have an issue and if you do and are rooted they wont help you. I don't entirely believe what they are up to, but I would advise freezing the app if your not willing to take any risks and are indeed rooted, or simply do not allow it to update.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
What about using the xposed app "root cloak"? Wouldn't it hide the root binary and su app?
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
I noticed that, too, but forgot to post about it. Thanks for bringing it up.
I saw that the other day too. I just told it to always deny.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I'm not going to worry about it. If they decide to take action against root users who cares I'm leaving the network when my contract runs up anyways.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I noticed the same thing... Allowed it by habit, and quickly did a restore... I thought was fishy... Who knows I'm not under warranty anyways,I bought this device outright on eBay....But still didn't want then to know I'm rooted
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
rootcloak would be the best option, it will keep the app from seeing the device as rooted as opposed to it getting the denied response and vzw still getting their snooping done.
Yeah, I got a root request from the update today. ****. That. I denied the permission and Uninstalled the app.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
meskes said:
Yeah, I got a root request from the update today. ****. That. I denied the permission and Uninstalled the app.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I did yesterday!
rcicu said:
That's what I did yesterday!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm of the similar mindset that Big Red is profiling every device on the network to see who's rooted for warranty issues, as well. Even if they do flag my device as such, I'm not really worried about it. I just don't like the idea of them being invasive like that. It's my device, I'm out of contract, and with how much I pay, you're damn right I'm going to do as I please. If they want to disallow me service, that's fine by me. They'd only be hurting themselves.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
meskes said:
I'm of the similar mindset that Big Red is profiling every device on the network to see who's rooted for warranty issues, as well. Even if they do flag my device as such, I'm not really worried about it. I just don't like the idea of them being invasive like that. It's my device, I'm out of contract, and with how much I pay, you're damn right I'm going to do as I please. If they want to disallow me service, that's fine by me. They'd only be hurting themselves.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well after is seen that I activated my H2O SIM and have been running on that for 24hrs. When my wife's phone comes later today I will terminate my service with VZW... I pay too much money for there games... time to cut my bill in half!
rcicu said:
Well after is seen that I activated my H2O SIM and have been running on that for 24hrs. When my wife's phone comes later today I will terminate my service with VZW... I pay too much money for there games... time to cut my bill in half!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only reason I still have vzw is because I live in the country. Once Magenta rolls out the 700 MHZ band tho, I'm gone.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
I'm curious, does denying root access send some info to the myverizon app that a su binary is present but permission was denied?
orangechoochoo said:
I'm curious, does denying root access send some info to the myverizon app that a su binary is present but permission was denied?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably.
Please press the thanks button if I have helped you in anyway.
orangechoochoo said:
I'm curious, does denying root access send some info to the myverizon app that a su binary is present but permission was denied?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Yes it does. If you don't want them to know you have root, yet keep the app, use xposed+root cloak.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
sent from my Z971-A-LTE using XDA free app mobile app
tech_yeet said:
sent from my Z971-A-LTE using XDA free app mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. They can exempt Spotify and others because they do packet inspection on the packets coming from your phone and see they're headed for Spotify servers, then they exempt them from being counted. (I saw your other thread) It would be EXTREMELY stupid for T-Mobile to rely on any data from the handset to make a determination on whether to throttle a packet or not (at least like what you're suggesting), otherwise yes, people would get around it.