Related
[KERNEL] International FROST Kernel
NOTICE: This is COMPATIBLE with AOSP+ AND PureAosp JellyBean 4.3!
Just a statement regarding kernel source: The Kernel Source is of course covered under GPL version 2. Free software does NOT mean no work or time was spent working on it. I have donated a large sum of my free time to hack this kernel. If you use my modified kernel source in parts or in its entirety, I kindly ask you mention its origins and to send me a github pull request or PM whenever you find bugs or think you can help improve my kernel hack further. This way the entire community will truly benefit from the spirit of open source. Thank you !
THIS KERNEL IS CURRENTLY IN TESTING STATUS AND NOT BETA OR STABLE
*Features*
Quad Core is disabled by default, the X+ will now turn into a Dual core device (this can be changed with the performance governor)
Memory features are = to that of a 3.4 android kernel
more to come
XDA:DevDB Information
Frost, a Kernel for the HTC One X+
Contributors
Lloir, tombriden, corne, Maxwen, faux123
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2013-09-18
Last Updated 2013-09-30
Reserved
Reserved
Re: [KERNEL] SUPER WIP Pizza Kernel AT&T
Thb I know I dont have this phone but I planing on getting it and didn't see a linaro optimized just saying its a change of pace ...if u don't put it in its cool and anyone saying linaro doesn't do anything is crazy if its there why not use it ..its different could mean better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
don728871 said:
Thb I know I dont have this phone but I planing on getting it and didn't see a linaro optimized just saying its a change of pace ...if u don't put it in its cool and anyone saying linaro doesn't do anything is crazy if its there why not use it ..its different could mean better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the Linaro optimizations consist of both changes made to the Android Open Source Project (and CM) as well as a special toolchain that uses GCC 4.7. Because this is a kernel that is only offered in its source form, it is up to you to build it with the Linaro toolchain if you want to see the performance benefits that can arise from the Linaro optimizations. Also Lloir was somewhat specific in telling you not to make feature requests (I would consider Linaro such a request), so you might want to read his post a bit more closely next time.
The link doesn't work! It's dead link!
Can you fix it?
fantik_m said:
The link doesn't work! It's dead link!
Can you fix it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can go here. This is the most up to date that i could find.
TheJokah said:
You can go....... This is the most up to date that i could find.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks but same sh***it bro...
fantik_m said:
Thanks but same sh***it bro...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a link to the kernel source. you would have to build the kernel yourself. if your looking for a CM kernel for ATT HOX+, then i would wait for a fully working CM rom first. There is still audio issues with CM, however devs are working on it. Be patient :laugh:
TheJokah said:
This is a link to the kernel source. you would have to build the kernel yourself. if your looking for a CM kernel for ATT HOX+, then i would wait for a fully working CM rom first. There is still audio issues with CM, however devs are working on it. Be patient :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and i'm ultra busy this month so i have VERY little time to debug or work on ATT X+
Lloir said:
and i'm ultra busy this month so i have VERY little time to debug or work on ATT X+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can take as long as you want. Nobody is trying to rush your fantastic work. Keep it up bro! :highfive:
[No message]
Hello, I wanted to ask you, who are a community of experts, to take off a question.
Why us with the galaxy s3 int we are still stuck at version 3.0.xx kernel? and for example users with galaxy s plus they have kernel versions 3.4
There are some incompatibilities?
is a problem of the processors Exynos?
Thanks for your attention
because you shouldn't compare versions in different devices.
PS read the sticky threads before posting. Qs go into Q&A
Because Samsung. Exynos or not, they keep certain kernel versions a long time.
On the other hand, if it works and works well, why upgrade?
Glebun said:
because you shouldn't compare versions in different devices.
PS read the sticky threads before posting. Qs go into Q&A
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the error (if there is any mod that can move the discussion in Q & A :good
Anyway I did this comparison because it was the first terminal that came to my mind,
why do you say that I should not compare your different terminals?
Theshawty said:
Because Samsung. Exynos or not, they keep certain kernel versions a long time.
On the other hand, if it works and works well, why upgrade?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, no, it works well for what it is just my question on this fact because you can get to a kernel upgrade (perhaps in the end it does not change anything)
Volpe92 said:
No, no, it works well for what it is just my question on this fact because you can get to a kernel upgrade (perhaps in the end it does not change anything)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernels usually have a higher linux version.
Theshawty said:
Custom kernels usually have a higher linux version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's right! ... But also the various Temasek, Googy, Siyah etc. to s3 are stationary to that version 3.0.xx, for what I wondered why even the custom kernel does not make a version upgrade
Volpe92 said:
It's right! ... But also the various Temasek, Googy, Siyah etc. to s3 are stationary to that version 3.0.xx, for what I wondered why even the custom kernel does not make a version upgrade
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The US S3's have the 3.4 kernel now I believe. They are all Qualcomm-equipped devices, though.
Theshawty said:
The US S3's have the 3.4 kernel now I believe. They are all Qualcomm-equipped devices, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh .... then it is assumed to be due to the processor Exynos and its sources to blame? : (
We are forced to keep up with updates to Samsung?
If so I put his soul in peace because you are no longer heard from those sources : Angel:
Volpe92 said:
Oh .... then it is assumed to be due to the processor Exynos and its sources to blame? : (
We are forced to keep up with updates to Samsung?
If so I put his soul in peace because you are no longer heard from those sources : Angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think so, yeah.
Yes they're different kernel strains.
3.0.85 is the latest in one strain used in aosp (3rd July) released the same day as 3.4.52
https://www.kernel.org
They run in parallel
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
rootSU said:
Yes they're different kernel strains.
3.0.85 is the latest in one strain used in aosp (3rd July) released the same day as 3.4.52
https://www.kernel.org
They run in parallel
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for site
you see that needs to stay that way ...
In fact, I now mount the Temasek 3.0.85 great kernel
Last thing: but essentially have no difference the two versions?
Volpe92 said:
Thank you for site
you see that needs to stay that way ...
In fact, I now mount the Temasek 3.0.85 great kernel
Last thing: but essentially have no difference the two versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.4 is supposedly better.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
3.4 over 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 introduces bugfixes (obviously) but more important, it introduces new "features".
I put features in " because often a new feature will be a hardware driver or a new protocol or method.
However, these new features wont be relevant to all hardware sets. For example, I don't need my s3 kernel to provide support for the latest broadcom Gigabit pci-x network card or update chipset drivers for the intel i7-540M laptop processors....
In 3.0.x we get the same bug fixes. There's really no point updating the base version if it doesn't include a feature we need.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
rootSU said:
3.4 over 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 introduces bugfixes (obviously) but more important, it introduces new "features".
I put features in " because often a new feature will be a hardware driver or a new protocol or method.
However, these new features wont be relevant to all hardware sets. For example, I don't need my s3 kernel to provide support for the latest broadcom Gigabit pci-x network card or update chipset drivers for the intel i7-540M laptop processors....
In 3.0.x we get the same bug fixes. There's really no point updating the base version if it doesn't include a feature we need.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have centered the answer : D this is what I wanted.
As you say you "run in parallel" : Highfive:
Thank you very much for your reply and to all those who responded
Volpe92 said:
As you say you "run in parallel"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. From the link I posted on the last page, kernels 3.0, 3.2 and 3.4 are longterm support, meaning these kernels will continue to be updated for some time.
Hi,
I want to build an AOSP kernel from source. I'm running a 5.1.1 AOSP build, so I'm trying to find out where I can get the source for 5.1.1 AOSP. Is there any source code for all Qualcomm MSM chipset devices in general? Thanks.
Bump; anyone got ideas?
You will have to find the source for your device. There is no one for all kernel source. If you are already running an aosp build then the kernel is already included
zelendel said:
You will have to find the source for your device. There is no one for all kernel source. If you are already running an aosp build then the kernel is already included
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So would I build with that kernel? Or can I use Motorola source? Will Motorola's 5.0.2 source code work with 5.1.1?
GreyArmour said:
So would I build with that kernel? Or can I use Motorola source? Will Motorola's 5.0.2 source code work with 5.1.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may work but there will be bugs. As for the source that depends on the device your using and the set up. I have not touched a moto in years but I know that stick HTC and Samsung kernels don't work on aosp based roms so you will have tons if trouble shooting to do if you try
zelendel said:
It may work but there will be bugs. As for the source that depends on the device your using and the set up. I have not touched a moto in years but I know that stick HTC and Samsung kernels don't work on aosp based roms so you will have tons if trouble shooting to do if you try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK. Would using the kernel that came with my AOSP ROM to build a kernel be wrong or is that alright?
linux kernel 4.1 released why are we still using 3.0? I am just wondering
nhmanas said:
linux kernel 4.1 released why are we still using 3.0? I am just wondering
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting a new linux kernel to a device is not simple. It brings a lot of stability issues if the kernel version is too new, and so most developers stick with a LTS release such as v3.4.104. Most s2 kernels are at kernel version 3.0.101 because it is found to be stable, and so they stick with the mentality that 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'.
gsstudios said:
Porting a new linux kernel to a device is not simple. It brings a lot of stability issues if the kernel version is too new, and so most developers stick with a LTS release such as v3.4.104. Most s2 kernels are at kernel version 3.0.101 because it is found to be stable, and so they stick with the mentality that 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really love your kernel and you are the new kernel master of i9100 now for me. Then why don't you use v3.4.104? My friend's phone is s4 mini and he is using a v3.4.x.x kernel. I think it is stable to use
nhmanas said:
I really love your kernel and you are the new kernel master of i9100 now for me. Then why don't you use v3.4.104? My friend's phone is s4 mini and he is using a v3.4.x.x kernel. I think it is stable to use
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, I think I don't have enough developing experience to do such task chhapil is also thinking to update linux version, but is also unsure whether to upgrade to a newer version or downgrade to 3.4.104.
gsstudios said:
Honestly, I think I don't have enough developing experience to do such task chhapil is also thinking to update linux version, but is also unsure whether to upgrade to a newer version or downgrade to 3.4.104.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
nhmanas said:
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s2/development-derivatives/kernel-dorimanx-lp-5-x-x-t3145879
nhmanas said:
Thank you for your replies. I have 2 more questions.
1. What are the pros of upgrading 3.4.104 kernel
2. So our device is official cm12.1 now and sources are online. Will you release a lollipop kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Some pros of updating Linux kernel could include increased speed and security (since 3.0.101 kernels are not updated anymore) .
2. I guess you didn't see my Sig? Noppy already linked my dorimanx lp kernel thread. Yes, it works perfectly with cm12.1, however doesn't work yet on other roms like paranoid android and slimlp.
gsstudios said:
1. Some pros of updating Linux kernel could include increased speed and security (since 3.0.101 kernels are not updated anymore) .
2. I guess you didn't see my Sig? Noppy already linked my dorimanx lp kernel thread. Yes, it works perfectly with cm12.1, however doesn't work yet on other roms like paranoid android and slimlp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
omg thats what I'm waiting for thanks for all mate
Will this phone ever see official Cyanogenmod roms?
No. Le will never release kernel sources. So you will never have pure CM roms. The CM roms will be based on official ones like 16S, 17S etc.
sanke1 said:
No. Le will never release kernel sources. So you will never have pure CM roms. The CM roms will be based on official ones like 16S, 17S etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
zsajak said:
Will this phone ever see official Cyanogenmod roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never say never it's being worked on
deadman96385 said:
Never say never it's being worked on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without the kernel sources?
zsajak said:
Without the kernel sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the kernel source
deadman96385 said:
With the kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought they are not going to release the sources?
zsajak said:
I thought they are not going to release the sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
deadman96385 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure I understand
deadman96385 said:
With the kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the kernel sources have been leaked or some enterprising dude has managed to extract the device tree.
sanke1 said:
I think the kernel sources have been leaked or some enterprising dude has managed to extract the device tree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be fantastic, lack of cyanogenmod is the only thing that keeps me from buying the device.
deadman96385 said:
Never say never it's being worked on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you maybe be clearer on this? How likely is it that this is actually going to happen?
I don't know @deadman96385, but i think if a User which such "Experience" in a Community like XDA Developers tells you that the kernel sources may be release, i think you just have to be a Little bit Patient and anytime your dreams will be fulfilled... am i right deadman?
Antisound said:
I don't know @deadman96385, but i think if a User which such "Experience" in a Community like XDA Developers tells you that the kernel sources may be release, i think you just have to be a Little bit Patient and anytime your dreams will be fulfilled... am i right deadman?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct
Antisound said:
I don't know @deadman96385, but i think if a User which such "Experience" in a Community like XDA Developers tells you that the kernel sources may be release, i think you just have to be a Little bit Patient and anytime your dreams will be fulfilled... am i right deadman?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I guess, its just this is the key reason whether I decide to buy this phone or not, dont want to be stuck with chinese roms in the future.
Hi,
Well we already have resurrection remix which is more than decent.
OK... Maybe with a precompiled kernel but still.
I use it as a daily driver and encountered no problems so far except for a slightly too high battery drain.
But a device tree would allow to build other ROMs which would be really cool...
Regards
@deadman96385 it's already in the mid of september.. do you still see any realistic chance that we're gonna see some kernel source or a cyanogenmod in the future. if you do.. of which timeframe do we talk? days, weeks months?
NexusPenguin said:
Hi,
Well we already have resurrection remix which is more than decent.
OK... Maybe with a precompiled kernel but still.
I use it as a daily driver and encountered no problems so far except for a slightly too high battery drain.
But a device tree would allow to build other ROMs which would be really cool...
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the main disadvantages between precompiled kernel and the use of kernel sources?
Also, I recommend checking htcmania Spain forum, because Parasite_remix is cooking Mooke and CM13 ROMs with 17S firmware.
chemavilla said:
What are the main disadvantages between precompiled kernel and the use of kernel sources?
Also, I recommend checking htcmania Spain forum, because Parasite_remix is cooking Mooke and CM13 ROMs with 17S firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
With the custom kernel, that one can be "optimized" for the device and all missing drivers can be added. At least, that is what I have been told but I'd be glad to be proven wrong.
For the htcmania link : thanks a ton, but I don't think I'll use it.
I sold the x820. Battery drain was really too high and even with moderate use, I could barely get through the day
Finding a replacement was tough, but I am trying the Xiaomi mi5 and Moto X Style (Pure) to see if they can do the job...
Both have flaws the x820 had not. And I honestly must admit that I am missing the x820 already
Regards.
NexusPenguin said:
Hi,
With the custom kernel, that one can be "optimized" for the device and all missing drivers can be added. At least, that is what I have been told but I'd be glad to be proven wrong.
For the htcmania link : thanks a ton, but I don't think I'll use it.
I sold the x820. Battery drain was really too high and even with moderate use, I could barely get through the day
Finding a replacement was tough, but I am trying the Xiaomi mi5 and Moto X Style (Pure) to see if they can do the job...
Both have flaws the x820 had not. And I honestly must admit that I am missing the x820 already
Regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty bad to hear this.
Sadly though, more and more people are leaving the Le Max2 camp. If only they would release the sources...
Anyhow, good luck with your next device
chemavilla said:
What are the main disadvantages between precompiled kernel and the use of kernel sources?
Also, I recommend checking htcmania Spain forum, because Parasite_remix is cooking Mooke and CM13 ROMs with 17S firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a few problems with using prebuilt kernels.
1. Upstream changes in Android source code might need related kernel changes, if you don't have the kernel source you can't do this.
2. For the same reason, you may be stuck on old android versions if the kernel isn't compatible with newer versions
3 Vendor may have customized some android frameworks and made related kernel changes. As CM wouldn't have these changed frameworks, some features may not work (although this doesn't appear to be an issue with this phone as the CM builds for it seems to be fully functional)