Hi, i have a problem with camera. I tried also other cameras like the Google one. The thing is that with my last Samsung phone (Galaxy Core) i always did perfect macros with 5 cm of distance from the object! With Redmi Note 2 you must stay at least at 10-12 cm to get a macro, with the result that also the background is focused. I think that is a lens problem... How about your macros?
However it is not only a macro problem
This camera can't simply focus subjects that are near it
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Same here. My old Xperia S did a better job with macros.
Are you using auto or manual focus?
I use Tap to focus
I do not have this problem. I get a clear picture at 5cm, but anything less will be blurry.
I have same problem with my note 3. Well today i figured it out. With a help with a friend. The glass protector of my cam have a few litle scratches. When i take it down camera works perfect.
Scratches are almost invisible.
Poslano z mojega SM-N920C z uporabo Tapatalk
Tried also today
Nothing to do.. You must stay at least at 8-10 cm in order to get a good macro
Mhm. Try some other camera. But I think that 10 cm is OK it's not a pro.macro camera. Booh. Try with macro lenses. For me it worked
Poslano z mojega SM-N920C z uporabo Tapatalk
Sometimes macros are very goods
But you must stay at least at 10 cm from the subject
Yeah but than this is not macro for me. With macro lenses macro photos are quite good
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
Same here, i can't even scan many QR codes. Let alone the tiny QR codes that Xiaomi itself uses on their headphones!
Same problem for me.
Envoyé de mon Redmi Note 2 en utilisant Tapatalk
There are many different type of lens. Marco lens work from 10 cm onward. For Note 2 you must hold it 10 cm away to focus. The words are readable.
---------- Post added at 06:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 AM ----------
This is from the same distance using the in camera x4.0 zoom. Not tac sharp but acceptable.
Noticed the same when received my Note 2. I don't think that it is a problem of camera or the device. It just how it works. All my previous devices (phones and cameras) can focus on closer objects.
That's what it can do if you focus from 12+ cm.
I have thia good macro manual focus with cm 12.1 by mokee..
Great shutter speed n better quality from srock miui camera..
Trully hard focus for around 10cm range focus..
Just a problem with lack of feature thats all..
Okay, so Redmi 3 takes much better macros compared to RN2. It's able to focus at much closer objects and I'm able to get some awesome macro shots with it.
plan to buy it on next week, but confused between redmi note 2 and redmi note 3
hi sir,
i have planned to buy a xiaomi device, but i cant choose one becoz of lack of experience so can you help me to figure out what is best device from redmi note 2 and redmi note 3, plzzz
droidaem said:
Okay, so Redmi 3 takes much better macros compared to RN2. It's able to focus at much closer objects and I'm able to get some awesome macro shots with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which RMN3 do you have? The one with the Qualcomm 650 or with the MTK X10? Because the "old" one is basically a RMN2 with a fingerscanner.
sampath bandara said:
hi sir,
i have planned to buy a xiaomi device, but i cant choose one becoz of lack of experience so can you help me to figure out what is best device from redmi note 2 and redmi note 3, plzzz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are multiple versions of both phones (the RMN2 has all versions using the same hardware except for the 4G and bands differing, so still be carefull which version you buy for your country). But the RMN3 is even more confusing, since there are versions that use completely different hardware.
The first RMN3 was basically identical to the RMN2 except for the casing, fingerprint scanner and larger battery, and missing the option to have a microSD card. But screen, processor etc were identical to RMN2.
But later they released an updated RMN3, with a newer processor and higher resolution camera, and also the option to use microSD cards. So, the most obvious response is to go for THAT version.
This means the "Redmi Note 3 Pro Prime", using the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 with 3GB RAM and 32GB ROM is the best phone.
i havent qualcom version in my country
ozfunghi said:
Which RMN3 do you have? The one with the Qualcomm 650 or with the MTK X10? Because the "old" one is basically a RMN2 with a fingerscanner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's just Redmi 3, not the note one. I thought it has the same sensor as Redmi Note 2, but apparently it doesn't as it seems to have a bigger lens.
Related
Post and share the images taken with OnePlus 2 here.No off-topics.
I'll start
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Tapped from my lactuca virosa
Some of my first test shots using stock app. Going to try Open Camera for more control.
-- from my OnePlus 2
Nice. Just got an invite and ordered on Friday. I'll add some once I get it.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Forums Pro.
Some more... highlights blown out on some but these were just regular full auto point and shoot.
Since there are no OP stores here, this was the best I could do... [emoji3]
-- from my OnePlus 2
Too bad the camera app doesn't do auto HDR. Samsung, LG, Motorola, and Apple all can detect blown highlights and automatically enable HDR. Kind of annoying to have to manually switch modes back and forth in 2015. It's something that annoys me about my Nexus 6 as well.
Yeah it is a good feature. Problem with OP2 is HDR shots take a few seconds to process unlike the S6.
-- from my OnePlus 2
kinghu said:
Yeah it is a good feature. Problem with OP2 is HDR shots take a few seconds to process unlike the S6.
-- from my OnePlus 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish more companies would do single exposure HDR like the S6. Loved that HDR photos with the S6 were instant. It requires a top of the line sensor (which the OnePlus 2 has I think) and very smart software processing, which is the tricky part.
I'm not sure that the OP2 has a top notch sensor. It takes v good photos but the S6 is a bit more consistent in the quality of photos it takes.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
apd said:
I'm not sure that the OP2 has a top notch sensor. It takes v good photos but the S6 is a bit more consistent in the quality of photos it takes.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that's mostly because Samsung has perfected their camera software though. After all, it's software that chooses the correct focus, ISO, shutter speed, white balance, and then does noise reduction and color correction on the image. If the software gets any one of those parameters wrong for a given scene, the end result will not be good regardless of how good the sensor is.
gtg465x said:
I think that's mostly because Samsung has perfected their camera software though. After all, it's software that chooses the correct focus, ISO, shutter speed, white balance, and then does noise reduction and color correction on the image. If the software gets any one of those parameters wrong for a given scene, the end result will not be good regardless of how good the sensor is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That may be right. The Samsung camera app itself is awful but it may be down to the processing software. Whatever it is, the results are consistently good and better than the iPhone 6 plus, which is saying something!!!!
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
This is the first test shot I took with mine, I've done I thing with it, but it actually felt much darker outside than this picture looks... I'll do some proper test shots over the next few days
Sent from my ONE A2003 using XDA Free mobile app
vaisakh7 said:
Post and share the images taken with OnePlus 2 here.No off-topics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What camera app did you use to take those photos? just stock?
pp123456 said:
What camera app did you use to take those photos? just stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.Stock!
Tapped from my lactuca virosa
vaisakh7 said:
Post and share the images taken with OnePlus 2 here.No off-topics.
I'll start
Tapped from my lactuca virosa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, that is some delicious bokeh!
Does HDR+ in the Google Camera app work with this phone since there's full Camera2 API support (excluding DNG capture)? If so it'd be really awesome to see how it compares to the stock app's Auto and HDR modes
Low light shot from OP2.
Low lights
Wysłane z mojego ONE A2001 przy użyciu Tapatalka
Another shot from my OP2.
tried to focus
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
to the OP
where is that sky from?
Good morning to everyone. As I wrote yesterday, I prepared a mini photo quality comparison between rdn4 and LG G5.
Unfortunately I could not get out a lot of photos (I was in-laws in the village?))
But I was able to take off several mainly nearby.
I can say that many times the result surprised me!
Really worthy rdn4 standing against device wearing of the best cameras of 2016 !! (LG G5)
At the end I will do and link from google drive folder with the photos in their original quality.
I expect comments?)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6lDlpRDegOCYlg2bVpnN0g5Sms
Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk
dimi30 said:
Good morning to everyone. As I wrote yesterday, I prepared a mini photo quality comparison between rdn4 and LG G5.
Unfortunately I could not get out a lot of photos (I was in-laws in the village?))
But I was able to take off several mainly nearby.
I can say that many times the result surprised me!
Really worthy rdn4 standing against device wearing of the best cameras of 2016 !! (LG G5)
At the end I will do and link from google drive folder with the photos in their original quality.
I expect comments?)
Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you upload the images directly? They look like they've been compressed, especially since it went through whatever editing software to write the models in.
LG G5 is classes above the Redmi series, they are not even comparable. Perhaps the real comparison would be between LG G5 and Xiaomi Mi5.
RN4 is a good phone indeed but it falls into the mid-range class.
dimi30 said:
Good morning to everyone. As I wrote yesterday, I prepared a mini photo quality comparison between rdn4 and LG G5.
Unfortunately I could not get out a lot of photos (I was in-laws in the village?))
But I was able to take off several mainly nearby.
I can say that many times the result surprised me!
Really worthy rdn4 standing against device wearing of the best cameras of 2016 !! (LG G5)
At the end I will do and link from google drive folder with the photos in their original quality.
I expect comments?)
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6lDlpRDegOCYlg2bVpnN0g5Sms
Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the great comparison! It really highlights the real world camera performance difference in less than ideal (mostly low light, which the G5 is well equipped to handle) conditions. The Redmi 4 does well for its price, but it really is miles behind in terms of detail (extremely soft photos), its white balance is off but at least noise is kept to acceptable levels. It's camera algorithms are surprisingly mature, showing less oversharpening and fringing than the G5 and that considering it had to work a lot harder trying to retain detail with that poor sensor and lens. Can you do a follow-up review in good light?
Looks like The G5 has a better camera. Bad news :/
I have a Redmi Note 4 and the camera is decent, not not very good.
In low light condition it is even worst...
All the Redmi pictures have a horrible yellow tint. Plus the lack of OIS makes the pictures blurry - especially the one with the potted plant
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 9 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Cesenatico Italy
Now i can post, thanks
I bought the phone 4 hours ago, the camera is mainly good and better than Note5, sadly there's no Huawei update yet in my region.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
photorama said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice pictures.
I got the device today. I think the camera is fantastic and I'm coming from an iPhone 7 plus (after a note 7). Especially the aperture mode. That is something amazing.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Agreed. Aperture mode is brilliant. I've lost countless hours playing with it.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using XDA Labs
How would you rate the camera on mate 9 against note 5? Now I have n5 but I want to change on mate 9. Camera is the most important for me because I have 2 little boys and I make a lot of pictures of them.
Haven't made that many photos yet but the camera is miles better than my old nexus 6.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
What about the pictures in the low light? I've heard that is not good?
Wysłane z mojego SM-N920C przy użyciu Tapatalka
I find them fine. Perhaps noisier than my iPhone. But at least i have bokeh. Nothing out there enable such creativity
Sent from my MHA-L29 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Does setting your photo resolution to 12MP produce better quality photos compared to 20MP? In other words, is the 20MP camera sensor oversampling to produce a better quality 12MP photo?
trace1er said:
Does setting your photo resolution to 12MP produce better quality photos compared to 20MP? In other words, is the 20MP camera sensor oversampling to produce a better quality 12MP photo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
20MP is better cause it use the 20MP black and white sensor.
gm007 said:
20MP is better cause it use the 20MP black and white sensor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if 20MP pictures are really better because those are built from BW sensor image and colors are filled from 12 MP RGB sensor.
Personally I have always used 12MP pictures but that doesn't make it better option
Unless you are printing them, or pixel peeping, it's probably moot.
What matters is the details ,so 20MP is better since the details are coming from the 20MP sensor.
But again, if your just looking at the photo on-screen, it's scaled down to less than 20MP, and even less than 12MP. Any extra details that might be there, won't be noticed unless you zoom in, or print it.
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 9 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the photos very detailed :good::good::good:
gm007 said:
What matters is the details ,so 20MP is better since the details are coming from the 20MP sensor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even shooting a 12MP resolution photo, I'm under the impression that both cameras are still used. The details still come from the 20MP camera. I was wondering if it oversamples the pixels to create a better image, much like what Nokia Lumia phones used to do. The Lumia 1020 had a 41MP camera, but produced 5 megapixel images that were absolutely stunning.
I bought the mate 9 and honestly I'm not satisfied with the images. Especially in low light. My note 5 was a little bit better in my opinion. I think I will back to n5
Wysłane z mojego MHA-L29 przy użyciu Tapatalka
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Good quality pictures
for the ones that needs extreme level of sharpness in images, i consider this good
Hello.
Now my turn. Ill just post pictures.
Redmi Note 4 - RR - OpenCamera on STD
https://allthepics.net/image/lWPSY
Redmi Note 4 - RR - GCamMod - STD
https://allthepics.net/image/lWvrB
My old device in a similar price point: ASUS ZE500KL - to compare devices: https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=8531&idPhone2=7474#global,*,*]
https://allthepics.net/image/lWpJr
More mido shots available here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rosy30ihtfs3bmu/Camera-Test-NEVER-DELETE-FROM-DROPBOX-OR-DIE.zip?dl=0] - ACHTUNG DATA USERS - the file is almost 120 MB
Protips
On MIUI the camera quality is a bit better than on LineageOS based roms.
If You are really in the manual controls just for fun or not You will need to edit the build.prop file and that needs root.
The light sensor can suffer gratefully in low light conditions generating a lot of noise.
If Your goal is to get the best pictures in the World of mobiles eg. visible every single snowflake in mid air without smudges => get a DSLR camera and a phone.
The stutter is pretty much responsive there is almost no lag when pressing the shot button
great photos!
Camera quality is excellent with Google Camera with AutoHDR+.
Quality is comparable with my entry-level 10 years old compact camera when shot in raw. Not the best camera in the market but more than enough for average usage.
_mov_ax said:
Quality is comparable with my entry-level 10 years old compact camera when shot in raw. Not the best camera in the market but more than enough for average usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does note 4 support RAW mode?
iamfoolish said:
Does note 4 support RAW mode?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only if you unlock the bootloader and add camera2api support on build.prop or mods
My note 4x front camera is significantly worse than my friends note 4x camera
It's really noticable
Any way to fix this?
I am rooted and have twrp installed
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
There is still no solution (Redmi Note 4X). Oreo will probably not be. In vain, the camera2api works, Gcam is not good. [emoji849][emoji848][emoji2955]
Tapatalkkal Redmi Note 4X
Lui7601 said:
There is still no solution (Redmi Note 4X). Oreo will probably not be. In vain, the camera2api works, Gcam is not good. [emoji849][emoji848][emoji2955]
Tapatalkkal Redmi Note 4X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what custom ROMs are for. We have Oreo and Pie (in early stage) and perfectly working GCams which makes our camera a lot better than on MIUI
GCam port by BSG produce very good quality photos with HDR+ mode. No lag while taking snap.
I have using my device for more than 3 years now. I mostly use it for communicating over chat apps and media consumption. I have been using various builds of LineageOS (official and unoffical) after the first year of purchase. But more importantly, Gcam has been with me even before that. I started using Gcam mods like that of BSG's 5.* during early years of development.
After coming long way now, the mods are mostly stable and all the included features works flawlessly (keeping in mind the device specific restrictions). The first thing after setting up my device after installing a new custom ROM (or upgrading) I do is install Gcam mod without doing anything else.
I and many my friends (also my FB group mems) have this problem. Both camera and screen cause it
How about your phone?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk
Wrong orange color
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk
After update to v153 my cors are perfect. I will upload photos later
this is 100% color accuracy as the real thing
papavales said:
this is 100% color accuracy as the real thing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Watch GT orange band taken by P30 Pro with build 153
Sent from my EVR-AL00 using Tapatalk
Zanr Zij said:
The Watch GT orange band taken by P30 Pro with build 153
Sent from my EVR-AL00 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have the p30 pro (I've the Mate 20 Pro, and I'm thinking to upgrade to p30 pro) but, If the build is the same (153) but you have different output, as external guy that did not have the device I would try first to repeat the test maybe after an hard reset of the device. If the results will be the same, the only thing you can do is try to understand if the camera sensors are the same for all the devices, brand side. I don't want to think that Huawei mounted on the p30 pro same sensors but from 2 different vendors, as they did for the mate 20 pro displays ( afaik samsung with the galaxy s6 did the same... isocell samsung sensor and sony sensors)
9.1.0.153 got rid of this weird red and orange tinge on all the photos I've taken so far - very happy overall with this new firmware!
Also, it shouldn't do any harm to go into your Camera's settings and deleting the cache and data too just in case (it probably won't do much but there's no risk to doing this)
nick-1988 said:
I don't have the p30 pro (I've the Mate 20 Pro, and I'm thinking to upgrade to p30 pro) but, If the build is the same (153) but you have different output, as external guy that did not have the device I would try first to repeat the test maybe after an hard reset of the device. If the results will be the same, the only thing you can do is try to understand if the camera sensors are the same for all the devices, brand side. I don't want to think that Huawei mounted on the p30 pro same sensors but from 2 different vendors, as they did for the mate 20 pro displays ( afaik samsung with the galaxy s6 did the same... isocell samsung sensor and sony sensors)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
P30 Pro using the very different camera sensor: RYYB instead of RGGB. This cause Orange color problem .
denzs88 said:
9.1.0.153 got rid of this weird red and orange tinge on all the photos I've taken so far - very happy overall with this new firmware!
Also, it shouldn't do any harm to go into your Camera's settings and deleting the cache and data too just in case (it probably won't do much but there's no risk to doing this)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Build 153 improved situation but problem still there. The screen also different to almost of other phones interm of reddish when display skin tone
Zanr Zij said:
Build 153 improved situation but problem still there. The screen also different to almost of other phones interm of reddish when display skin tone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know Chinese phone companies prefer to tune with slight pink as it makes Chinese people skin looks better.(like Kpop look). Then with a western person the skin looks off. This is in favor to the local domestic market. I am not sure if the global models sent out are tuned less pinkish or it maybe default for all units.
got 153 and it still... bruhh
If next patch can't fix this RYYB problem maybe I gonna switch back to S10+
https://imgur.com/a/MN6aGak