Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 9 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Cesenatico Italy
Now i can post, thanks
I bought the phone 4 hours ago, the camera is mainly good and better than Note5, sadly there's no Huawei update yet in my region.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
photorama said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice pictures.
I got the device today. I think the camera is fantastic and I'm coming from an iPhone 7 plus (after a note 7). Especially the aperture mode. That is something amazing.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Agreed. Aperture mode is brilliant. I've lost countless hours playing with it.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using XDA Labs
How would you rate the camera on mate 9 against note 5? Now I have n5 but I want to change on mate 9. Camera is the most important for me because I have 2 little boys and I make a lot of pictures of them.
Haven't made that many photos yet but the camera is miles better than my old nexus 6.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
What about the pictures in the low light? I've heard that is not good?
Wysłane z mojego SM-N920C przy użyciu Tapatalka
I find them fine. Perhaps noisier than my iPhone. But at least i have bokeh. Nothing out there enable such creativity
Sent from my MHA-L29 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Does setting your photo resolution to 12MP produce better quality photos compared to 20MP? In other words, is the 20MP camera sensor oversampling to produce a better quality 12MP photo?
trace1er said:
Does setting your photo resolution to 12MP produce better quality photos compared to 20MP? In other words, is the 20MP camera sensor oversampling to produce a better quality 12MP photo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
20MP is better cause it use the 20MP black and white sensor.
gm007 said:
20MP is better cause it use the 20MP black and white sensor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if 20MP pictures are really better because those are built from BW sensor image and colors are filled from 12 MP RGB sensor.
Personally I have always used 12MP pictures but that doesn't make it better option
Unless you are printing them, or pixel peeping, it's probably moot.
What matters is the details ,so 20MP is better since the details are coming from the 20MP sensor.
But again, if your just looking at the photo on-screen, it's scaled down to less than 20MP, and even less than 12MP. Any extra details that might be there, won't be noticed unless you zoom in, or print it.
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 9 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the photos very detailed :good::good::good:
gm007 said:
What matters is the details ,so 20MP is better since the details are coming from the 20MP sensor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even shooting a 12MP resolution photo, I'm under the impression that both cameras are still used. The details still come from the 20MP camera. I was wondering if it oversamples the pixels to create a better image, much like what Nokia Lumia phones used to do. The Lumia 1020 had a 41MP camera, but produced 5 megapixel images that were absolutely stunning.
I bought the mate 9 and honestly I'm not satisfied with the images. Especially in low light. My note 5 was a little bit better in my opinion. I think I will back to n5
Wysłane z mojego MHA-L29 przy użyciu Tapatalka
Related
I got to try out the stock camera on my DNA today.
The pics do it justice in high light situations. But noticing that they will do poorly on Zoomed and dim photos.
Here are unedited shots.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Any tips on enhancing it even more to get the most out of the DNA camera? any mods?
In low light conditions, switch the ISO to 200 and use flash, it will take decent to nice pics that way, especially if the object or person isn't that far away... It may be a little hard to see the object/person but I think it does well..
Nice pics
Hope it helps
You might also note that the default resolution w/ a widescreen (16:9) picture is only about 6 megapixels. If you switch to the 4:3 resolution, it will use the full resolution of the sensor and give you 8 megapixel pictures.
jasoraso said:
You might also note that the default resolution w/ a widescreen (16:9) picture is only about 6 megapixels. If you switch to the 4:3 resolution, it will use the full resolution of the sensor and give you 8 megapixel pictures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One thing to keep in mind if you do this is that if you want to use the front camera you should switch it back to 16:9 to get the most resolution out of that one.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Interesting tips didn't know that about the resolution.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
jasoraso said:
You might also note that the default resolution w/ a widescreen (16:9) picture is only about 6 megapixels. If you switch to the 4:3 resolution, it will use the full resolution of the sensor and give you 8 megapixel pictures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent tip, did not know that. Thanks
jlevy73 said:
Excellent tip, did not know that. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the full blown 8M pics deff do a lot better, not to mention they're friggin huge.
Brax33 said:
Yeah, the full blown 8M pics deff do a lot better, not to mention they're friggin huge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you use dropbox, box, or bitcasa, you can automatically sync your pictures to your account. Take pic, auto upload, then delete off phone (if space is an issue.)
jasoraso said:
You might also note that the default resolution w/ a widescreen (16:9) picture is only about 6 megapixels. If you switch to the 4:3 resolution, it will use the full resolution of the sensor and give you 8 megapixel pictures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 8 megapixel picture will produce a larger file, but does it actually add in terms of better sharpness and richer details? I am just worried that the relatively weak sensor (it's a cell phone after all) will not be able add much more useful data beyond the 6 default megapixels, just more interpolated fluff.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
cowisland said:
The 8 megapixel picture will produce a larger file, but does it actually add in terms of better sharpness and richer details? I am just worried that the relatively weak sensor (it's a cell phone after all) will not be able add much more useful data beyond the 6 default megapixels, just more interpolated fluff.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding of the way the sensor is creating widescreen (16:9) pictures, is that it is cutting the top 10% and bottom 10% of the picture off. Setting the camera to 4:3 gathers data from the full sensor. I don't think it the interpolation is changing.
Another way to think about the 16:9 picture, is if you set the camera to take a 4:3 picture, and then printed the picture, you would have a picture with a 4:3 ratio. If you then cut the top 10% (or so) and the bottom 10% (or so) of the picture off of the print, you would then have the same 16:9 picture that you would have had if you had the camera set to the default setting. It doesn't really effect the 16:9 picture, but you aren't utilizing the full surface area of the sensor.
Post and share the images taken with OnePlus 2 here.No off-topics.
I'll start
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Tapped from my lactuca virosa
Some of my first test shots using stock app. Going to try Open Camera for more control.
-- from my OnePlus 2
Nice. Just got an invite and ordered on Friday. I'll add some once I get it.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Forums Pro.
Some more... highlights blown out on some but these were just regular full auto point and shoot.
Since there are no OP stores here, this was the best I could do... [emoji3]
-- from my OnePlus 2
Too bad the camera app doesn't do auto HDR. Samsung, LG, Motorola, and Apple all can detect blown highlights and automatically enable HDR. Kind of annoying to have to manually switch modes back and forth in 2015. It's something that annoys me about my Nexus 6 as well.
Yeah it is a good feature. Problem with OP2 is HDR shots take a few seconds to process unlike the S6.
-- from my OnePlus 2
kinghu said:
Yeah it is a good feature. Problem with OP2 is HDR shots take a few seconds to process unlike the S6.
-- from my OnePlus 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish more companies would do single exposure HDR like the S6. Loved that HDR photos with the S6 were instant. It requires a top of the line sensor (which the OnePlus 2 has I think) and very smart software processing, which is the tricky part.
I'm not sure that the OP2 has a top notch sensor. It takes v good photos but the S6 is a bit more consistent in the quality of photos it takes.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
apd said:
I'm not sure that the OP2 has a top notch sensor. It takes v good photos but the S6 is a bit more consistent in the quality of photos it takes.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that's mostly because Samsung has perfected their camera software though. After all, it's software that chooses the correct focus, ISO, shutter speed, white balance, and then does noise reduction and color correction on the image. If the software gets any one of those parameters wrong for a given scene, the end result will not be good regardless of how good the sensor is.
gtg465x said:
I think that's mostly because Samsung has perfected their camera software though. After all, it's software that chooses the correct focus, ISO, shutter speed, white balance, and then does noise reduction and color correction on the image. If the software gets any one of those parameters wrong for a given scene, the end result will not be good regardless of how good the sensor is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That may be right. The Samsung camera app itself is awful but it may be down to the processing software. Whatever it is, the results are consistently good and better than the iPhone 6 plus, which is saying something!!!!
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
This is the first test shot I took with mine, I've done I thing with it, but it actually felt much darker outside than this picture looks... I'll do some proper test shots over the next few days
Sent from my ONE A2003 using XDA Free mobile app
vaisakh7 said:
Post and share the images taken with OnePlus 2 here.No off-topics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What camera app did you use to take those photos? just stock?
pp123456 said:
What camera app did you use to take those photos? just stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.Stock!
Tapped from my lactuca virosa
vaisakh7 said:
Post and share the images taken with OnePlus 2 here.No off-topics.
I'll start
Tapped from my lactuca virosa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, that is some delicious bokeh!
Does HDR+ in the Google Camera app work with this phone since there's full Camera2 API support (excluding DNG capture)? If so it'd be really awesome to see how it compares to the stock app's Auto and HDR modes
Low light shot from OP2.
Low lights
Wysłane z mojego ONE A2001 przy użyciu Tapatalka
Another shot from my OP2.
tried to focus
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
to the OP
where is that sky from?
At the club, at the bar, or just in your mom's basement, nighttime is when you come out to play. Rate this thread to express how the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge's camera performs when no or low light is present. A higher rating indicates that the camera sensor "sees" lots of light in dim conditions, and that the resulting photos have minimal noise. A higher rating also indicates that when the flash fires, the resulting photo is evenly-lit without any bright spots.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Best low light phone cam ever
I'm looking for a comparison S7 vs LG G4, especially in low light...
Infinity123 said:
Best low light phone cam ever
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...that means you haven't seen Nexus 6P low light performance.
dehnhaide said:
...that means you haven't seen Nexus 6P low light performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have. S7 beats it.
They must be pretty dang close in comparison. Would probably be specific to the situation. Here are the specs:
Nexus 6P: f2.0 aperture and 1.55 μm pixel size. Not a great f stop, but that's some big pixels.
S7 Edge: f1.7 aperture and 1.4 μm pixel size. Awesome aperture, especially for getting that background blurred out, but the pixel size isn't quite as big.
Comparison with a G4 (to see individual images, right click on each image and open in new tab for full original uploaded on imgur)
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=e294c402-e57c-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
I can publish more of these of some of you want
VictorC said:
Comparison with a G4 (to see individual images, right click on each image and open in new tab for full original uploaded on imgur)
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=e294c402-e57c-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
I can publish more of these of some of you want
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes more of it please, night and low light. But original size...
DoKaTSuYa said:
Yes more of it please, night and low light. But original size...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are original size (the comparison tool resisez itself to adjust to your screen, but you can open each individual image with a right click + open in new tab as they were uploaded on imgur)
---------- Post added at 01:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:36 AM ----------
Here you go, more comparisons G4 vs S7 Edge (for original image try right click + open image in new tab and it should lead you to the imgur URL)
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=dc1d3468-e57e-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=b831fda4-e57e-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=719bf6a6-e57e-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
I think objectively s7 picks up more detail in highlights where g4 seems to be doing slightly better with shadows. I also think that g4 is better with contrast (because s7 is overly contrasty), but s7 takes the prize because it doesn't have such prominent lens flare, which got very bad in one of the shots.
http://i.imgur.com/MU54jwz.jpg
Your G4 looks like it has the flare problem ?
I really like the spectrum color, it's the only one that don't turn yellowish in low light.
I really think the G4 is better in low light than S7. Except for the flare (it could have been that the lens was smudgy a bit, who knows), the G4 took better, more detailed and overall less noisy pictures. But, more importantly, it was closer to the real lighting in those scenes. The S7 would go all nuts with yellow-orangeish tints... When I took the photos, looking at them on the phones, I saw very little differences, but when I looked at them on a 27 inch monitor I saw where and how the G4 stood out.
You definitely has lens flare problem. Check thiss thread : http://forum.xda-developers.com/verizon-g4/help/2-g4s-cameras-screen-temps-t3186732
Try to clean your lens
both pic from LG G4 :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Damn after seeing the G4 up against the S7 camera.... I'm fairly disappointed.
VictorC said:
I really think the G4 is better in low light than S7. Except for the flare (it could have been that the lens was smudgy a bit, who knows), the G4 took better, more detailed and overall less noisy pictures. But, more importantly, it was closer to the real lighting in those scenes. The S7 would go all nuts with yellow-orangeish tints... When I took the photos, looking at them on the phones, I saw very little differences, but when I looked at them on a 27 inch monitor I saw where and how the G4 stood out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi @VictorC,
This is another Victor, from Bucharest as well! Thanks a lot for your comparison shots. I would like, provided you have the spare time, to meet and go together with a 3 smartphones comparison. I own a Nexus 6p and I am willing to bet will wipe the floor with S7 in low light (and not only). We can talk on private about this initiative. :good:
Here is another one in low light indoors:
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=ac2dc43a-e5dc-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
And some daytime shots (sorry if they are out of place here):
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=e13a233a-e5dc-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=aba32694-e5dd-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=cbcf4704-e5dd-11e5-a524-0e7075bba956
By no means do I think the S7 Edge camera is bad (far from it actually), it's just that I think it's too aggressive and, in low light, it has some trouble with finding the right white balance. Still, these things could be corrected via updates.
You have a Sony or Isocell sensor ?
Isocell
VictorC said:
Isocell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that explains it.
Actually it does not. I have yet to see a comparison between shots taken with S7/S7E with Isocell and Sony sensors
In my experience, the stock camera's HDR+ mode works great for suppressing noise in low-light pics, but doesn't really do much for actual high dynamic range scenes.
In a typical dark foreground/sunny background situation, my (2014) Moto X used to do a great job keeping the highlights from overexposing and bringing up the dark parts of the scene. My 6P, on the other hand, using the stock Google camera with HDR+ active, barely seems to do anything in this respect. Sunny skies are still blown out, faces in the foreground almost black. I'm not looking for an overprocessed HDR "effect", but this seems a little too subtle.
I just want to make sure this isn't a problem specific to my device, so: anyone else seeing the same thing?
Edit -- I tried a couple of dedicated HDR apps from the Play Store but they all say that the 6P lacks exposure mode so they can't do the bracketing needed for true HDR.
I feel the same. Compared to the LG G4 I had before, HDR on 6P barely does anything.
Maybe its my old eyes, but I can't noticed a real difference either.
Thanks folks. So it isn't just me.
Maybe "HDR" is just a poorly chosen name for this feature. Like I said, for noisy low-light pics it works really well. Just look closely while it's still processing: shortly after it finishes, you can see the noisy version being replaced with much cleaner picture. But apparently it's not optimized for high-contrast scenes.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn Nexus 6P met Tapatalk
Actually it works really well. Here's why: it saves you from blowing your highlights. It doesn't do much for shadows, however it gives you a very clean image where your able to boost the shadows to your liking and the image remains clean. It stays away from that garbage fake "HDR" look that most apps create.
Also! Proshot does exposure bracketing very well. Here is a screenshot of how to setup the settings for it to work. Use these settings and you'll be fine.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hey, thanks.
What got me doubting was an example in the article where Google introduced the feature, here. In the second example (the landscape with the two girls in the foreground), the difference is quite pronounced. The image on the right, shot with HDR+ on, has a fully defined sky with visible clouds etc.
But I've shot images with HDR+ on that looked a lot more like the blown-out comparison shot on the left, with large highlight zones with no detail captured at all. Could be I was asking too much of it on those occasions, I'm not sure. I'll experiment a little more and try and get some examples.
ProShot is great, thanks for the tip, just bought the full version!
Hi, I've been struggling with HDR apps on the 6P thanks to the exposure compensation bug (https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=196815) and was hoping your Pro Shot setting might help. When I tried it I got three photos, but two were at the same exposure, while the third was much much brighter. It also doesn't seem to merge them together automatically.
supertallrich said:
Hi, I've been struggling with HDR apps on the 6P thanks to the exposure compensation bug (https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=196815) and was hoping your Pro Shot setting might help. When I tried it I got three photos, but two were at the same exposure, while the third was much much brighter. It also doesn't seem to merge them together automatically.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Instead of using SPD4 use SPD1.
Also, proshot doesn't merge them for you. You have to do that yourself.
Mr Patchy Patch said:
Instead of using SPD4 use SPD1.
Also, proshot doesn't merge them for you. You have to do that yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, that did the trick! Good to know about the merging, much appreciated.
supertallrich said:
Thanks, that did the trick! Good to know about the merging, much appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. Enjoy!
Noup, you're not the only one I usually have to choose between having blowed out skies or having people underexposed ...
I just switched to my 6P from an LG G4. While I liked the HDR on the camera, I feel the 6P produces a better image overall. Much less sharpening/watercolor look to the 6P photos. The LG's started to look like fake watercolors when you view them on anything but the phone, unless the light was absolutely perfect, which it rarely was.
But with that said, HDR seems to be terrible on this phone with the stock app, in my limited experience.
Robrecht said:
In my experience, the stock camera's HDR+ mode works great for suppressing noise in low-light pics, but doesn't really do much for actual high dynamic range scenes.
In a typical dark foreground/sunny background situation, my (2014) Moto X used to do a great job keeping the highlights from overexposing and bringing up the dark parts of the scene. My 6P, on the other hand, using the stock Google camera with HDR+ active, barely seems to do anything in this respect. Sunny skies are still blown out, faces in the foreground almost black. I'm not looking for an overprocessed HDR "effect", but this seems a little too subtle.
I just want to make sure this isn't a problem specific to my device, so: anyone else seeing the same thing?
Edit -- I tried a couple of dedicated HDR apps from the Play Store but they all say that the 6P lacks exposure mode so they can't do the bracketing needed for true HDR.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take a picture inside by a window and you can see the difference with HDR+ on. You can basically see what's outside the window with HDR+ on but the window looks blown out with it off.
This... I've written about this before saying that it shouldn't be called HDR+ but instead Low Light+. The HDR effect is minimal compared to the low light noise reduction.
Typically on an iPhone you can get reasonable backlit photos. When I tried to do the same on my Nexus 6p, HDR+ offered little to no improvement. I decided to use my iPhone instead which did a mich better job for actually adding dynamic range.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I took some pics. Hope you guys like it
https://vgy.me/L99jPn.jpg
https://vgy.me/7gIF16.jpg
https://vgy.me/7WV1pB.jpg
https://vgy.me/sNlDz0.jpg
https://vgy.me/oOq6yk.jpg
https://vgy.me/1hHtYV.jpg
https://vgy.me/NOBgxF.jpg
https://vgy.me/o3Egxb.jpg
https://vgy.me/16hSNc.jpg
Very clear, every photo is crispy. This is one of the best camera in a smartphone right now...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
All of them are in auto mode. No post-processing.
https://eksiup.com/60db88cb330
https://eksiup.com/1e728d9d696
https://eksiup.com/b9601481047
https://eksiup.com/fcd20849c86
https://eksiup.com/da3df688f39
https://eksiup.com/a0fbf459f81
https://eksiup.com/8e8f51f3114
Pictures are nice. I'm coming from a p20pro, so i'll see in the short term. With the P20pro it was hit or miss situation for pictures on the go (quick snap). As for prepared ones not too many issues. Where issues came in for me, that i hope i won't have with the N9 will be moving objects (cars, kids, animals). I'll see then.
Here you go.
p20p vs note 9 various garden pictures. quick shots, no gimmicks not trying my best.. casual quick ones.
You can open the two folders in different windows to compare. The are original sizes.
P20 Pro Folder
Note 9 Folder
SAO said:
Here you go.
p20p vs note 9 various garden pictures. quick shots, no gimmicks not trying my best.. casual quick ones.
You can open the two folders in different windows to compare. The are original sizes.
P20 Pro Folder
Note 9 Folder
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my opinion Note9 exposure is better and overall results as well. Not to different than my S9+
EVERYTHING ON AUTO MODE, NO POST PROCESSING
My complains are indoor shots in regards to color and sharpness. Note 9 seems to produce a more saturated color or more yellowish than my note 8 and is not as sharp I would say 75% of the shots I've made compared to my note 8. Note 8 although has more noise in low light, color is very accurate and most cases pictures turn out sharper without having to retake. Fyi my couch is Grey and not brown as depicted by the note 9
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
aznmode said:
My complains are indoor shots in regards to color and sharpness. Note 9 seems to produce a more saturated color or more yellowish than my note 8 and is not as sharp I would say 75% of the shots I've made compared to my note 8. Note 8 although has more noise in low light, color is very accurate and most cases pictures turn out sharper without having to retake. Fyi my couch is Grey and not brown as depicted by the note 9
View attachment 4579379View attachment 4579380View attachment 4579381View attachment 4579382View attachment 4579383View attachment 4579384View attachment 4579385View attachment 4579386
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
f1.5 wont be as sharp as f1.7 and it will mean the camera can use a lower iso to eliminate more noise , so a slightly softer image with less noise compared to the note 8 could be expected on hardware alone
SAO said:
Here you go.
p20p vs note 9 various garden pictures. quick shots, no gimmicks not trying my best.. casual quick ones.
You can open the two folders in different windows to compare. The are original sizes.
P20 Pro Folder
Note 9 Folder
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.. ive grown to hate the p20 pro's camera and have ordered a note 9...
aznmode said:
My complains are indoor shots in regards to color and sharpness. Note 9 seems to produce a more saturated color or more yellowish than my note 8 and is not as sharp I would say 75% of the shots I've made compared to my note 8. Note 8 although has more noise in low light, color is very accurate and most cases pictures turn out sharper without having to retake. Fyi my couch is Grey and not brown as depicted by the note 9
View attachment 4579379View attachment 4579380View attachment 4579381View attachment 4579382View attachment 4579383View attachment 4579384View attachment 4579385View attachment 4579386
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is just a firmware thing, like a choice that samsung made, except of course the bag. Bag looks bad
Intellligent
new intelliigent and smart camera does a great job low light works very well
I don't really tweak anything when taking photos pre or post. This phone takes great pictures on both the front and facing camera with no input from me.
Anyone having issues with light glare? Never had this issue with any phone before. Took some family photos at the beach around sunset and noticed all of them had really bad glare from the sun. Then took some more photos tonight during dinner and the street lights caused horrendous glare in the photos! WTF! And yes, the lens clean and spec free.
I've not used the camera and 'a.i.' enough to dislike it like some of the reviewers, but my nerd self is impressed when it instantly knows i'm taking a shot of my dog. I've not been bothered by any of the post-processing yet. Some great detail shots up above.
I too am disappointed with the quality of indoor/low light shots the Note 9 takes. The shots taken by my Note 8, both stock and with the ported Pixel Google cam, appear sharper and more colorful. I am content with all other areas of the phone: battery life, S-pen features, stereo Dolby Atmos speakers, processor speed. It would be the perfect phone if those cameras can be upgraded for indoor scenes ( outdoor shots are awesome).
Abdulaziz6p said:
Very clear, every photo is crispy. This is one of the best camera in a smartphone right now...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in good lighting condition, the camera does exceptionally well. but in the needs of HDR and low lighting,the camera is trash.
How about some long exposure shots in pro mode?
ISO50 at 10 seconds is amazing.
Obviously tripod required.
BUT! With the remote ability of the S-pen, it's indeed possible to capture shots with zero motion blur just like a decent camera with remote trigger...