hello guys,
my mom have int. s3 and after trying many roms... she always suffering from laggy system and buggy custom rom so now she returned to stock rom 4.1.2 as feeling that its faster than 4.3 stock.
now what is the recommended kernel to give her more performance with stability ..
regards,
5aaled said:
hello guys,
my mom have int. s3 and after trying many roms... she always suffering from laggy system and buggy custom rom so now she returned to stock rom 4.1.2 as feeling that its faster than 4.3 stock.
now what is the recommended kernel to give her more performance with stability ..
regards,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you tried liquid smooth Kitkat?
when i used it it hadnt any buggy issues
overall its a very stable rom except skype doesnt work!
5aaled said:
hello guys,
my mom have int. s3 and after trying many roms... she always suffering from laggy system and buggy custom rom so now she returned to stock rom 4.1.2 as feeling that its faster than 4.3 stock.
now what is the recommended kernel to give her more performance with stability ..
regards,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go search for these kernel:
1. Siyah (supports up to 4.3 only, discontinued)
2. Yank (supports up to 4.3 only, discontinued)
3. Boeffla (eol, maintenance only)
4. Agni
I'd suggest to reset to factory since your lagging is caused by apps that's hogging the rams. Kernel alone only can help to a certain level
^^^
If you're using a Samsung based rom use AGNi purestock kernel, if not use Boeffla Kernel or Yank kernel (been using this for months but I use Boeffla now)
Changing kernel will stop some apps from working. If i had to recommend one it'd be agni or boeffla. If i had to make you choose it'd be a stock kernel.
Sent from my HTC One M9 using Tapatalk
Related
I recently rooted my brother's evo and installed a custom ics rom on it, but hes been having a lot of problems with it and really bad battery drain. Can someone please recommend a stable daily driver (gingerbread or ics) with good battery life and no bugs please. Thanks in advance
i recommend MeanRom 4.3 However, you have to make sure to flash a custom kernel on there as well or you'll have some reboot issues. Either the newest anthrax kernel or dodava's
abdeviation said:
i recommend MeanRom 4.3 However, you have to make sure to flash a custom kernel on there as well or you'll have some reboot issues. Either the newest anthrax kernel or dodava's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've heard MeanRom 4.2 (not 4.3) with Dodava's 5.4 kernel is the most stable, battery efficient Gingerbread ROM.
quick question,
basically what are the benifits of custom roms compared to stock kies roms ?
i currently have rr 2.2 rom but appart from the looks and animations etc.. is there a difference in performance/ battery compared to stock?
its been a while sinse i have been on stock so i cant remember what it was like and i just wanted to know are custom roms more better in terms or speed/battery/power etc..
thanks
jonnyhall1bmx1 said:
quick question,
basically what are the benifits of custom roms compared to stock kies roms ?
i currently have rr 2.2 rom but appart from the looks and animations etc.. is there a difference in performance/ battery compared to stock?
its been a while sinse i have been on stock so i cant remember what it was like and i just wanted to know are custom roms more better in terms or speed/battery/power etc..
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
custom rom do come with there own pro's and con's u have to check the changelog of that rom to see whats different in it also some apps which do require root previlage wrks fine with custom roms rather than stock one's
stock roms do have better batt life compared 2 custom ones at the cost of customization with there dull and boring looks
thanks for your reply i guess its just finding the correct balance between customization and battery life then. cheers
go with custom
I had the exact same thoughts when i first decided to flash a custom rom.
Personally i would now flash a custom rom at the drop of a hat, however as the previous comment said there are pros and cons.
do some research on roms with functionality that you require and you'll find one you want to flash no doubt.
hope i helped
i am now running CM9 and its so smooth and looks amazing, a millions times better than stock in almost every way!
Check out the ROM and the comments which people have wrote. Some of them may be good and others may be bad.. you'll be able to work out the missing features of the custom rom bother you or not ^__^ That's how I work out whether to install the ROM XD Most ICS ROM's have their benefits and cons, Gingerbread would be considered the most stable Hope this helps you
jonnyhall1bmx1 said:
quick question,
basically what are the benifits of custom roms compared to stock kies roms ?
i currently have rr 2.2 rom but appart from the looks and animations etc.. is there a difference in performance/ battery compared to stock?
its been a while sinse i have been on stock so i cant remember what it was like and i just wanted to know are custom roms more better in terms or speed/battery/power etc..
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Highly customizable. You can overclock, undervolt, theme, use different launchers. To me they're faster too.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
cheers guys i guess custom seems the way forward, just need to research the changelog of each rom that takes my fancy
thanks again guys !!
What about if I install a custom kernel, but keep my stock rom? Is there any benefit at all?
To clarify: I'm on i19100 4.0.3 which I've recently rooted. Thinking of installing Siyah 3.5.2 but for now I want to keep my stock (Bell) ROM. What do I stand to gain when I get the Siyah kernel, if anything? Or is the kernel really *only* just a prerequisite to get a custom ROM?
Thanks!
fgoyti said:
What about if I install a custom kernel, but keep my stock rom? Is there any benefit at all?
To clarify: I'm on i19100 4.0.3 which I've recently rooted. Thinking of installing Siyah 3.5.2 but for now I want to keep my stock (Bell) ROM. What do I stand to gain when I get the Siyah kernel, if anything? Or is the kernel really *only* just a prerequisite to get a custom ROM?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with siyah 3.5.2 installed u can be sure that no brick bug for u
and u can flash any custom ICS or JB rom with it
Sun90 said:
with siyah 3.5.2 installed u can be sure that no brick bug for u
and u can flash any custom ICS or JB rom with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But there's already no brick bug on 4.0.3 right? So... what exactly would I gain with the Siyah kernel?
The only thing I can think of is CPU/kernel modding
kilometers4 said:
Highly customizable. You can overclock, undervolt, theme, use different launchers. To me they're faster too.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am doing same on stock
Peace
Hit Thanks & It will Disappear
Sent from S II Running Official ICS 4.0.4 with Siyah 4.1 [/size]
One BIG reason I'm on stock ROM and KERNEL is that currently no custom Kernel supports MHL (please correct me if I'm wrong)
For me this is a big problem as I'm always watching movies and playing games on my TV with my phone
Obagleyfreer said:
One BIG reason I'm on stock ROM and KERNEL is that currently no custom Kernel supports MHL (please correct me if I'm wrong)
For me this is a big problem as I'm always watching movies and playing games on my TV with my phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the ROM, not the kernel, that determines if MHL fully works.
Apparently video works with AOSP, but not full mirror of the display.
However, if you want full mirroring, you'll need to be on a stock Samsung based ROM.
That said, you can still run a custom kernel, such as Siyah or SpeedMod, and MHL will still work as long as you remain on the Samsung based ROM.
I'm currently running stock XWLPX with Siyah 4.1.4, and MHL works fully for me.
Hi all,
I'm on Hellybean 4.2.1 rom for now, but I get only ~3500 points in antutu benchmark while my friend gets ~4500 points on his galaxy s. Witch kernel I should flash to get better performance on this rom?
sinedoOo said:
Hi all,
I'm on Hellybean 4.2.1 rom for now, but I get only ~3500 points in antutu benchmark while my friend gets ~4500 points on his galaxy s. Witch kernel I should flash to get better performance on this rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for jellybean, there isn't any other kernel. there's stock cm10.1 and devil kernel. also, I wouldn't worry about antutu bench marks, they don't mean anything
On 4.1.2 hellybean I flashed devil 1.8.1 and it was working very well, super fast in games, but when I try to flash newest 1.9.5 devil kernel on 4.2.1 rom I get a lot of errors on android start - like process com.android.phone has stopped working. So, is there any version of devil kernel that works in new 4.2.1 rom?
sinedoOo said:
On 4.1.2 hellybean I flashed devil 1.8.1 and it was working very well, super fast in games, but when I try to flash newest 1.9.5 devil kernel on 4.2.1 rom I get a lot of errors on android start - like process com.android.phone has stopped working. So, is there any version of devil kernel that works in new 4.2.1 rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
at the moment DT is building the devil kernel inline with hellybean, so no not at the moment, give him some time and he should release a kernel separately
Hi Guys,
Might be a bit of a noob question but I'll shoot it off anyway. I'm currently happily running SS3.11 with UTMS_Spyder CM10.1Nightly with ICS EU 4.04 Stock on XT910. :victory:
Everything seems to work like a charm and I'm wondering if anyone can tell me what benefit there is to taking everything back to stock and flash the JB EU OTA?
Seems like until Hashcode and Dhacker get CM10.1 and AOKP running properly with JB Kernel I'd actaully be loosing functionality?
Any devs care to comment / clarify?
Cheers,
Phil
It's really just personal preference. There used to be a whole list of things that didn't work on AOKP/CM10 however Hashcode/Dhacker have worked extremely hard to iron them all out, it's really impressive. CM10 just updated to using the JB kernel meaning there is no more graphic tearing and battery life is almost the same as stock. Bluetooth problems were fixed last month. I think the only big bug left is automatic flash on the camera (however this still works when setting manually).
But to answer your question, technically running stock you are losing functionality. CM10/AOKP are running 4.2.2 while stock is 4.1.2 (I believe), meaning there's a whole bunch of features missing in stock. CM10/AOKP are being updated nightly meaning they will only improve while stock... well it's just stock. There wont be another update unless something is seriously wrong or Motorola decides to upgrade to the next AOS. Stock also includes a crapton of bloatware which slow down the phone. Even if you manually remove/freeze everything, I still believe CM10/AOKP to have better performance than stock any day. Hope this answers your questions
Sv: [Q] JB OTA vs CM10.1 or AOKP
I just love the customizations that cm 10.1 gives you. I can never go back to stock again. I also run the hotplug governor un order to save battery (one cpu shuts down when not in use) with noop scheduler. This tips were given by the poster above! Try cm and you'll never go back!
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Is there an AOSP ROM that works with the leak JB kernel that the camera and tearing is fixed or only the soak kernel?
-Sent from Marino's Razr Maxx-
Many thanks
I Am Marino said:
Is there an AOSP ROM that works with the leak JB kernel that the camera and tearing is fixed or only the soak kernel?
-Sent from Marino's Razr Maxx-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then... I think the decision is easy. Wait for Moto to release JB Fastboot and the amazing devs here to make a root tool and update CM10.1.
Why take a step backwards from available functionality for an official OTA.
Cheers Guys,
:fingers-crossed:
Latest AOSP ROM posted http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2162827 is really good only bug is camera flash ....other bugs have been fixed great rom for daily use....
assassin34 said:
Latest AOSP ROM posted http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2162827 is really good only bug is camera flash ....other bugs have been fixed great rom for daily use....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I was running AOKP previously but have paid version of Juice Defender which started complaining that it didn't like ASOP base and I should switch to Cyanogenmod. Besides that compatabililty issue though I do really like AOKP ROM.. and did find it both fast and very stable.
hey all
so this is basic, what has more speed and extra battery life? according to your normal usage and kernel.
i like neatrom lite because of the way its been stripped down and it has all i need
Custom ROM v Stock ROM
Sparks9876 said:
i like neatrom lite because of the way its been stripped down and it has all i need
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My wife has neat rom on her phone, she likes that because she is not interested in mods etc, in some ways it seems smooth and is certainly very stable. However, I prefer CM based ROMs with custom kernels ala dorimanx or Apolo, and recently my battery life and performance on 4.3.1 compared to my wifes 4.1.2 has far outstripped my her neatrom. That being said, my phone is softbricked until I can replace the mini usb tomorrow as I had an issue today with my set up, so wiped rom to put a backup on, and then discovered I have no root and thus can't get back into recovery and have no rom to boot into, no usb means no odin, thus I am without phone until I get usb fixed. I guess thats the long and short of messing around with custom v stock, custom rom = more risk but potentially greater potential to implement the latest code, stock ROM = safe and reliable.
All that I have said is just my opinion based on my experience, I urge you to get your own and have fun doing it
Lite neatrom with apolo is crazy I can run a whole day with semi-aggressive usage! I just saw the CM had it stable on i9100 very lately thus I liked to try.
Uh oh......best ROM thread......
Thread locked down in.....
10..9..8..7..6..5........lol
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Not exactly keith.It looks to me hes after a better rom,not the best rom......,....lol
theunderling said:
Not exactly keith.It looks to me hes after a better rom,not the best rom......,....lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and the best rom is ...................................................................... hahaha
Thread closed as its a best ROM thread.