hey guys, got a quick question.
i benchmarked the phone on the stock rom.
in this case only with quadrant benchmark. i got about 40000 points. on all custom roms between 20k-27k points.
i got the snapdragonversion and tested my n5x and compared the phones, both on customroms.
they were pretty even, eventhough the RMN4 should outperform my n5x.
but the most confusing thing was that i got pretty much the half of the points in the quadrant benchmark on a customrom compared to the stock rom.
in the 3dmark "sling shot extreme" benchmark i got:
1096 points (Nexus 5x)
458 points (Redmi Note4)
could anybody run this tests on his phone to gimme a feedback about this?
in the antutu benchmark i got about 64k-66k points, whereas the stock rom is about 81k points
L-ViZ said:
hey guys, got a quick question.
i benchmarked the phone on the stock rom.
in this case only with quadrant benchmark. i got about 40000 points. on all custom roms between 20k-27k points.
i got the snapdragonversion and tested my n5x and compared the phones, both on customroms.
they were pretty even, eventhough the RMN4 should outperform my n5x.
but the most confusing thing was that i got pretty much the half of the points in the quadrant benchmark on a customrom compared to the stock rom.
in the 3dmark "sling shot extreme" benchmark i got:
1096 points (Nexus 5x)
458 points (Redmi Note4)
could anybody run this tests on his phone to gimme a feedback about this?
in the antutu benchmark i got about 64k-66k points, whereas the stock rom is about 81k points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SD 808 on the N5X is a higher end SOC than the SD 625, so N5X should outperform RN4 Qualcomm.
For me the Stock ROM and Custom ROMs get pretty much the same results on all the benchmarks.
alresave said:
The SD 808 on the N5X is a higher end SOC than the SD 625, so N5X should outperform RN4 Qualcomm.
For me the Stock ROM and Custom ROMs get pretty much the same results on all the benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can your share your results from antutu or quadrant standard and your rom/kernel/performance related settings? would be very kind of you
Related
So i just ran a test for the antutu benchmark with just the phone and nothing else and this is what i got Ill be running quadrant bench test also and that will be in my next reply Cant wait for root and unlock!
EDIT: Heres quadrant test stock with no 4g or extra stuff
wow how is the Antutu score so high???
hairdewx said:
wow how is the Antutu score so high???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadcore and that 2gb of ram haha imagine if i put my 64gb sd card in there haha
theDK10 said:
quadcore and that 2gb of ram haha imagine if i put my 64gb sd card in there haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sd cards don't help performance.
I got an Antutu score of 18424 right after activation
For reference, my Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet only had scores in the 12,000 range... WOW
I just received my Galaxy Note II today and was a bit shocked that it scored a lower score in AnTuTu's benchmark than my HTC Droid DNA. Given that it has a faster CPU and less pixels to render, you would think it would be faster.
I scored 19164 with my HTC Droid DNA, which is much higher than the 18084 I got with the Galaxy Note II.
makoto said:
I just received my Galaxy Note II today and was a bit shocked that it scored a lower score in AnTuTu's benchmark than my HTC Droid DNA. Given that it has a faster CPU and less pixels to render, you would think it would be faster.
I scored 19164 with my HTC Droid DNA, which is much higher than the 18084 I got with the Galaxy Note II.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Processor is newere on the droid dna, I will always say we don't use benchmarks, so stop being disappointed in your score it by no means represents everyday use..They are both future proof for a few years..
I have to laugh at people who care about benchmark scores when they have a device with a quad core cpu in it running Android.
Haha I don't care really about benchmarks I was just impressed that's all. DNA is nice but I need sd card and something with battery life. Only got about 3/4 through a day on a full charge.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
My s3 scores 6200 on quadrant, 11000 on antutu...tells you benchmarks are worthless.
droidstyle said:
My s3 scores 6200 on quadrant, 11000 on antutu...tells you benchmarks are worthless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im guessing rooted and unlocked? lol i got mine up 12000 rooted with a different kernal. As long as the phone runs fast and smooth i could care less lol
Benchmarks are far from worthless. They are an objective indicator of how certain components perform under the exact same stress test.
Now what you can say is worthless is people who look at a final score that is rather irrational instead of looking at individual component scores.
For example, CPU scores in these benchmarks is a clear indicator of which phone has a faster processor. While the very same phone that had a slower processor may have a significantly better GPU. What this means to the end user is that expect games to perform better on the slower CPU phone, but also expect things like web browsing to perform worse on the same device.
It's all objective comparisons, certainly not something to claim as "worthless" but at the same time if you do not look at it the right way and just throw a generic total score number around, then you won't be fairly comparing any two devices properly.
slide83 said:
Sd cards don't help performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong. The higher class sdcard, the faster the read/write speeds = better performance.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
ks3rv3rg said:
Wrong. The higher class sdcard, the faster the read/write speeds = better performance.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you :victory: My 64gb sd card increased the benchmark also. :good: And ya i usually look at certain things when running benchmarks but thats usually when im rooted and unlocked is when i really look at them closely.
After running Quadrant, my phone seems to warm up and each subsequent score is somewhat lower. I started at 6500 and it bottoms out around 6000. Anyone else have this heat problem?
Make sure everything is closed out when u run a test. It's putting everything to work in the phone so it's stressed out which could cause a lot of heat
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Is it possible to get our 820 soc overclocked with a custom kernel so it can compare to 821 chip?
No stable custom kernel available so far
And you can compare soc on web
Leo7D said:
No stable custom kernel available so far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link?
georgesalo said:
Link?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://wccftech.com/snapdragon-821-vs-snapdragon-820/
http://www.techgrapple.com/apple-a10-sd-821-820/
http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/snapdragon-820-vs-snapdragon-810
Leo7D said:
No stable custom kernel available so far
And you can compare soc on web
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he didn't want to compare but to overclock to make it faster.
Regards Filozof71
Sent from my Le X820 using Tapatalk
Difference between 820 and 821 is pretty negligible. I very much doubt that you could find any meaningful difference between the two in real-life performance, given that few if any apps currently push these CPUs anywhere near their full capability. All you'd probably achieve by slightly overclocking is very marginal gains in synthetic benchmark scores at the cost of battery life and possibly stability. In fact, thermal throttling would probably make performance worse. IMHO it would be a pointless exercise.
Not seeing much advantage on SD821.
Is there anything to gain on SD821 the higher clocking in CPU and GPU doesnt seem to translate into actually advantage and seems more like an gimmick to sell SD820 in new clothing, but fair enough it is an solid chipset..
Have my X822 (the dark grey version) for an couple of weeks now and been filling it up, but it still delivers insanse scores from an 222US handset-
from today in Basemark X' a +43k score. (at household temperaure ' - overall not to shabby from an little over 200US-handset)
anyone got an up to date ranking on Basemark X. (nb in high sett. L2M getting an little under 37k)
but ewen the Pixel XL that should be an SD821 is clocked in SD820s values, and comming in at ofc. 35.598k (hence X822 : 43.001)
http://powerboard.basemark.com/filter?benchmark=10&page=1&categories=0&os=0,2
Can you guys say what is the maximum benchmark score for mido 4/64gb variant in latest software update I Mean miui 9 I got a score of 59k is it good?
meheboobalam1 said:
Can you guys say what is the maximum benchmark score for mido 4/64gb variant in latest software update I Mean miui 9 I got a score of 59k is it good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm? Are you still that concern with benchmarks these days?
anyways, i got 64K+ on ViperOs, a good score but in Quadrant i got uninspiring results. (SD, 3GB version)
59K is good enough as long its perform well as day to day driver without any hiccup.
GabrielScott said:
Hm? Are you still that concern with benchmarks these days?
anyways, i got 64K+ on ViperOs, a good score but in Quadrant i got uninspiring results. (SD, 3GB version)
59K is good enough as long its perform well as day to day driver without any hiccup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using official stock ROM. Not a fan of custom ROM not anymore ultimately we will come back to stock ROM so why. Not modified stock ROM like Xiaomi.eu
65k on AEX without any modifications, 4/64gb variant.
64-65k on redmi note 4x (sd) 3/32, rom RR
Mine is 0 coz I dun care... Lol
aabenroi said:
Mine is 0 coz I dun care... Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if I was going to use benchmarking apps, I would rather use Geekbench4 or PC Mark2.0.
DarthJabba9 said:
Well, if I was going to use benchmarking apps, I would rather use Geekbench4 or PC Mark2.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
aabenroi said:
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MTk is scoring high because it's faster but for short amounts of time because they overheat, after 10-15minutes of heavy usage like gaming it's reducing CPU/GPU frequency to reduce heat (thermal throttling), and then the performance is much worse.
Thats why benchmarks are useless, they are too short to show the real performance. For example Snapdragon 625 can keep the same performance for hours during heavy gaming without thermal throttling, because it's super power & thermal efficient.
aabenroi said:
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The secret is to look at single-core performance. Multi-core benchmarks are always very high on MTK because their chips usually have more cores than others. However, how many apps actually use all those cores? All that the extra cores do is to suck your battery.
k3lcior said:
MTk is scoring high because it's faster but for short amounts of time because they overheat, after 10-15minutes of heavy usage like gaming it's reducing CPU/GPU frequency to reduce heat (thermal throttling), and then the performance is much worse.
Thats why benchmarks are useless, they are too short to show the real performance. For example Snapdragon 625 can keep the same performance for hours during heavy gaming without thermal throttling, because it's super power & thermal efficient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I agree,
Beside that, benchmark just measure raw power, big raw power is useless without good optimization.
Snapdragon n Kirin have lower raw power but easily beat mtk because they're way more optimized.
DarthJabba9 said:
The secret is to look at single-core performance. Multi-core benchmarks are always very high on MTK because their chips usually have more cores than others. However, how many apps actually use all those cores? All that the extra cores do is to suck your battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nowdays, mtk score very high at single core as well... But it still sucks...
I am using latest miui 10.3.8 with locked boot loader and my geek bench score is
SINGLE CORE-498
MULTI CORE-1751(latest geek bench from play store) I have seen way higher single scoreof other users. Is there any problem in my device ?please help my smartphone is still in warranty.
Hi
Just ran the new Geekbench 5 and my score is attached along with Geekbench 4 score, definitely big difference so what has changed in the scoring method?
I read recent reviews on Geek Bench 5 showing very low scores for POCO. This is clearly a bug in the latest version. Please use GeekBench 4 for accurate scores.
just read the article on xda comparing sd865 vs 855 vs kirin990
was curious to test mine the p30pro, well it scored higher than the mate and sd855 on both antutu 8.0.4 and 8.0.5 ?
any clues ? mine is android10/emui 10 , 8/128
ashouhdy said:
just read the article on xda comparing sd865 vs 855 vs kirin990
was curious to test mine the p30pro, well it scored higher than the mate and sd855 on both antutu 8.0.4 and 8.0.5 ?
any clues ? mine is android10/emui 10 , 8/128
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
? Your P30Pro is a beast.
Objectivity on tests and reported results are nowadays a big mess...
Chinese cheap better than a US cheap... Impossible... With all the trade ban and other big commercial fight... The truth is out there but where, in the customer's hands ?
ashouhdy said:
just read the article on xda comparing sd865 vs 855 vs kirin990
was curious to test mine the p30pro, well it scored higher than the mate and sd855 on both antutu 8.0.4 and 8.0.5 ?
any clues ? mine is android10/emui 10 , 8/128
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well,that's not true. What you see there is an average score,and most of the people do not take those tests correctly. They use power saving mode or normal mode without realizing that it affects the score. My P30 Pro (8GB RAM with 256GB storage) scored almost 416000 in Antutu BTW. I bet that Mate 30 Pro easily beats this score if it's done correctly,with performance mode active.
This is due to different versions of antutu. On latest version p30 pro scores 415k while mate 30 pro scores around 470k.