Hello, I just received today the June update and I've ran some benchmarks.
From what I've saw, the scores are much higher than Geekbench browser shows.
What scores do you have before the June update?
Here are my scores after the update:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I think it has to do with geekbench 5 vs geekbench 6.
I was mostly looking at the unusually low vulkan benchmark numbers from other devices. I was seeing plenty of benchmarks where the opengl was around 8000+ and the vulkan benchmark around 3000, which was very strange.
JoraForever said:
I was mostly looking at the unusually low vulkan benchmark numbers from other devices. I was seeing plenty of benchmarks where the opengl was around 8000+ and the vulkan benchmark around 3000, which was very strange.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's caused by one of the tests not running as intended for Vulkan's API. It resuslts in a 0 for this test, flawing the total.
Didn't notice this thread before.
My benchmarks here: https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/...rmware-sm-s918b-2nd-may.4548205/post-88673331
Related
woooooooooow
i think there is a probleme in vallemo my touchpad beat down tf prime and all tablets and phones using aokp rom
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
can you tell me your scores guys
I'd love to see some vellamo results from someone running that 2.157ghz kernel.
i love the part where its so small you can see nothing to verify the validity
ive also ran some Benchmarks on AOKP rom (plain, just GAPPS intalled)
standard
Quadrant: 2457
Vellamo: 1139
1,2GHZ
Quadrant: 2578
Vellamo: 1133
1,5GHZ
Quadrant: 2486
Vellamo: 1236
1,7GHZ
Quadrant: 2876
Vellamo: 1349
only the transformer prime beat me on 1,7GHZ but i can live with that^^
overall im very happy with the performance, especially when i think of the price i paid for the touchpad and how much the transformer prime costs
Does anyone know a good rom kernal combo to score around 3500+ on quadrant? Preferably ICS?
Derp...what was the deciding factor for needing to post this in the dev section? The Aokp discussion thread would of been a great place for this topic.
I don't always base my ROM choice on synthetic benchmarks but when I do I choose Quadrant.
Just for giggles, I updated Quadrant and ran it. On 35.1, glitched, at 110% OC, mine did 1400.
I think that's the first one I've ran since voodoo was inflating the scores and making our phones look really fast.
htim95 said:
Does anyone know a good rom kernal combo to score around 3500+ on quadrant? Preferably ICS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA
Didn't find a thread for the device so started a new one. Anyone else with this device?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent fra min Nexus 6P via Tapatalk
The antutu score is from my own device, recieved today
Sent fra min Nexus 6P via Tapatalk
I just bought the 4/32 version. It's a beast. Would love to see some development for it.
I have been researching the newer android tv boxes and the two with the highest benchmark scores and best 4k results are the H96 and Yundoo Y8, both of which feature the Rockchip RK3399 chipset. But there are lots of bad reviews for both when it come to reliability of the hardware. Overheating, freezing and units not working properly out of the box. I was just wondering what you guys experience has been?
I have this box firmware version 20171013. It is realy nice and the antutu score is 81000 wtih this firmware.
Hello, everyone.
I would very much appreciate your help on this case.
I just received my S21 (Exynos 2100) two days ago and already performed two factory resets in an attempt to solve the inconsistency of the GeekBench results I got on the device.
I've read several posts about the problem also being common in Android 11 and I think that somehow I don't have a defective unit.
Below is a screenshot of the results I obtained (all with a charged battery and an adequate temperature).
Could you please help me with some opinions?
Thanks a lot.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Doesn't matter. As long as your phone works the way it should, then there's no reason to even look at benchmarks. I use the exynos version of the S21 Ultra. Have no issues with the phone. I always have an iPhone and an android device at home. Honestly for me I prefer the S21 Ultra over the iPhone 12 pro max.
Your mileage may vary of course.
Hi guys, I just got my s21+ a few days ago and did geekbench and got 500 single core and 2200 multicore, I also tried antutu and got like 550000 points, what do you think the reason is?
Thank you!
Bloatware, apps running in background and/or not optimized.
xXNuafaXx said:
Hi guys, I just got my s21+ a few days ago and did geekbench and got 500 single core and 2200 multicore, I also tried antutu and got like 550000 points, what do you think the reason is?
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Power saving mode may be enabled?
Clear system cache too...
S21 exynos, not a bad score
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My compute score is highest to at 7464, running exynos, performance has been amazing
Just ran it again and got even higher