I'm just wondering what good benchmark results are. I'm at 683 at 1200mhz. What are you guys getting for results?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
demo23019 said:
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using king's #2 kernel. Are my numbers bad? I thought that the lower the number the better. I'm new with using benchmarks, so I really have no idea what I'm doing haha.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
i was using jacs kernel but it doesn't work with update so im stuck at 1ghz for now
Buy yea i never used setcpu to bench and with that yea lower is better.
im getting 755 with long bench
Im sure someone else will come post with similar 1.2 setup
I'm getting 622 on Long Bench in SetCPU
9.723 in Linpack
1940 in Quadrant
That's at 1200MHz on JAC's ExtremeMod with Voodoo, stock Deodexed 2.1
Dan_Brutal said:
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your numbers are fine. Dont be too conserned with benchmark scores even though it is fun to run them from a gear head point of view...
Although if you want a bit more accuracy, run any benchmark three times and average out your total score.
My scores are, so you have an idea:
Linpack= 9.2 averaged on three runs
SetCpu= Long Bench 636 averaged on three runs
Quadrant= 1863 on three runs
*(RyanZ's lagfix has been proven to cheat Quadrant thus giving users a much higher score. example: 2300,2400 etc.)*
Running Bionix 1.5 w/Jacs OC/Voodoo kernel
Related
So,as the title points out,Nenamark 2 is out and it sports some MUCH more advanced graphics,meaning it will stretch the GPU's abilities to the maximum.
Owning a Desire HD,I get 48 FPS @1.8GHz and performance governor on Nenamark 1.5(where GS2 gets 59.7).On the new Nenamark 2,with the exact same setup,I get a miserable 13.3 FPS.And I can tell you,graphics' quality of the benchmark can be compared to some simple PC games(Not Crysis obviously ).
So,what are your results?
(Same thread also on Sensation forums)
Here's my first and only run
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
I got 45.6 on my first run.. stock rom.
Seems the sgs2 is ruling the roost on this benchmark
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
49.7fps with stock ROM and performance governor in setCPU.
Did 3 runs, got 49.x fps in each run.
Sensation is handicapped in the test because it is running at higher res.
Could you guys try turning Chainfire3D off for a try?In case it affects results showing raw power of the GPU.
tolis626 said:
Could you guys try turning Chainfire3D off for a try?In case it affects results showing raw power of the GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 43,x with stock firmware and no root (so no Chainfire3D)
And yep,that's what I'm talkin' about!
I'm 80% sold at this point and all's inclining towards the Galaxy S 2!My wallet included!
Someone with the 1.5ghz overclock should try this
36 on first run, my sgs2 is a slough lol
rocketpaul said:
36 on first run, my sgs2 is a slough lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've scored lows of 36 too.
45.4 fps for me
Software has bugs. Shows needle between 50-60 but scores me at 43. First run was 35 after closing some apps.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
How about Electopia OpenGL ES 2.0 benchmark utility?
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.tactel.electopia
Has anyone used this for benchmarks? I don't have the phone myself, so can't test it
Third run i got 44.6 not to bothered about scores, not relevant in real world.
rd_nest said:
How about Electopia OpenGL ES 2.0 benchmark utility?
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.tactel.electopia
Has anyone used this for benchmarks? I don't have the phone myself, so can't test it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like that to
Got 53.8 as maximum score
Stock rooted KE7 no mods .
47.4 --- 47.5 --- 47.8
Electopia
Ave 45.07 fps
jje
OC @1.5 ghz and chainfire3d app
I too got 53.8 on nenamark as max
On electopia I got 56 fps.
Stock rom, no chainfire activated, no OC.
44/49 on nenamark
49/50 on electopia
45.2 - original ROM
Before rooting, I was getting quadrant scores around 2500. Now that I am rooted and froze various bloatware, I'm only getting scores around 2100. What happened?
try a reboot, and run it again
Quadrant is a crappy benchmark. Actually all the benchmark apps are but if you want the least crappy, Smartbench 2011 is your best bet. It's even supposed to be set up for dual core.
Sent from my DROID X2
Cause quads mean everything pznerd. Smartbench > quads sup.
Rooted. 2469 for me on Quadrant. 2790 on Smartbench 2011 I wanna try overclocking <3
I get a minimum of 2700 and regularly see 2900+ peaking out at 3150 once. I'm rooted with gingerbreak and kill all tasks before running quadrant. Be sure to run the test back to back a few times and try rebooting for best results.
My scores are consistently 2500 with junk running in the background, and I rooted about an hour ago, 3 scores of about 2500 (one was a low 2481) so I would suspect something you have installed is the culprit, other than being Rooted by itself.
My score
if i close all apps before doing test i get over 2800 every time easy im rooted and uninstalled all bloatware
How are other android touchpads doing? W / the 1.7ghz overclock I'm hitting a Max of 98ish mflops and 3300+ on quadrant! Which makes it my fastest Droid to date. Lets see if anybody can post a better quadrant screenshot?
richard head said:
How are other android touchpads doing? W / the 1.7ghz overclock I'm hitting a Max of 98ish mflops and 3300+ on quadrant! Which makes it my fastest Droid to date. Lets see if anybody can post a better quadrant screenshot?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i overclock my touchpad to 1.782 ghz. do you know how to overclock gpu
adreno 220 is in 266 mhz original but i need to overclock it to 300 mhz because its a very good frequency or 320 mhz
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Gotcha
Think I beat you
Fastest I've gotten. Have not really tried with the latest versions.
general feeling is that as far as benchmarks go, quadrant is crap
should try antutu instead.
ive a thread in this section somewhere where some people have posted results
This discussion seems a bit flawed, in that you're gauging performance based upon benchmark software, etc. We've talked about this a lot over the past year, and most of these tests are very dependent upon specific hardware setups, usually in much older devices with older chipsets. My Nexus S w/ a single-core 1ghz UNDERCLOCKED to 880mhz scores a 3500 all the time in Quadrant. No way in hell it's better than the touchpad. It's not even a fair fight, if you compare raw specs.
Do you judge the performance of your computer based on how fast it can perform iterations of Prime 95? No, you judge it based on user experience.
Is your user experience with CM7 very fast? I know mine is. Based on that, and the experience I get with gfx-intense apps like GTA3, etc, I say the performance is very good.
PS. The fact that Quadrant to this day still has the Nexus One as its top reference device says something about it being old and outdated. The Nexus One came out in Jan 2010, 2 years ago.
what apps is everyone using for their benchmark tests? i did antutu and quadrant, got 24,430 and 12292 respectively. are those good scores?
edit: i also ran vellamo and got 2081 on html5 and 814 on metal...
I got 12700 in Quadrant and 25524 in AnTuTu all stock. Benchmarks really don't mean much.
Other people run 3dmark and Geekbench too. And Epic Citadel.
Wow did a antutu test on both of my phones and was expecting my L 9 to beat my escape. Boy was I suprised! My l 9 got a 10,568 ( pretty good compared to some). Then I ran the escape. My jaw dropped when I saw the amazing score of 15139. WHOA, it beat it in every catagory except RAM operation. My l 9 is running kumas rom with pure performance tweaks with cpu overclocked at 1.2 ghz. The escape is running sphinx rom with no cpu tweaks. Strange thing is every stats info I see on the escape says it has 1.2 ghz dc snapdragon. However im getting 1.5 ghz??? hmm Whats everyone else scores looking like for their L 9 ?
I get around 11k running mateo's CM 10.2 ROM.
Sent from my LG-P765 using Tapatalk
I have 9,616 running CyanogenMod 10.2 official (19/11/2013) :crying:
DarwinDeLaRosa said:
I have 9,616 running CyanogenMod 10.2 official (19/11/2013) :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because custom rom overclock both CPU & GPU so it has higher score.
My L9 on CM 10.2 by mateo with stock cpu and gpu speeds i have 9843 pts
With CPU at 1,2 GHz i have 10671
With stock CPU and GPU at 384 MHz i have 9732 pts
With CPU at 1,2 GHz and GPU at 384 MHz i have 10706
With CPU at 1,35 GHz and GPU at 384 MHz i have 11502
lwg45714 said:
My l 9 is running kumas rom with pure performance tweaks with cpu overclocked at 1.2 ghz. The escape is running sphinx rom with no cpu tweaks. Strange thing is every stats info I see on the escape says it has 1.2 ghz dc snapdragon. However im getting 1.5 ghz??? hmm Whats everyone else scores looking like for their L 9 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your LG Escape has got a better cpu and gpu and it would have shown better performance anyway. My L9 running stock showed maximum of 9600 with pure performance tweaks. But I don't think Antutu points can give you a good idea of how fast and smooth your phone is
madheado said:
Your LG Escape has got a better cpu and gpu and it would have shown better performance anyway. My L9 running stock showed maximum of 9600 with pure performance tweaks. But I don't think Antutu points can give you a good idea of how fast and smooth your phone is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I was getting at. Despite having a better cpu and gpu on the escape using both phones side by side in real world use the L9 performs better ALL around. The gpu was a big part of the escapes high score. However in side by side comparisons the L9S graphics seems to look better and out perform the escape. So I honestly believe all benchmark scores reflects what the phones software/hardware is CAPABLE of performing not really HOW it performs with daily use. This would explain why a score can as much as double by simply running a custom rom. I would never solely base my opinion of a phones performance on a benchmark score. Sure it can give you a idea of what its software/hardware is capable of. However you cant honestly get a true feel for the performance until you try the phone. So my escape murders my L9 in benchmark scores. BUT my L9 murders my escape in real life usable performance. Anyone else agree with this?
lwg45714 said:
BUT my L9 murders my escape in real life usable performance. Anyone else agree with this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I got your point! I guess, the only good thing about the Escape's cpu and gpu is that it's more battery-friendly, isn't it?
madheado said:
Yeah, I got your point! I guess, the only good thing about the Escape's cpu and gpu is that it's more battery-friendly, isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, and both phones use the exact same battery. The escapes standby battery life is much longer than the L9 . During normal use the escape lasts longer as well by not to the degree of the standby difference.