So,as the title points out,Nenamark 2 is out and it sports some MUCH more advanced graphics,meaning it will stretch the GPU's abilities to the maximum.
Owning a Desire HD,I get 48 FPS @1.8GHz and performance governor on Nenamark 1.5(where GS2 gets 59.7).On the new Nenamark 2,with the exact same setup,I get a miserable 13.3 FPS.And I can tell you,graphics' quality of the benchmark can be compared to some simple PC games(Not Crysis obviously ).
So,what are your results?
(Same thread also on Sensation forums)
Here's my first and only run
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
I got 45.6 on my first run.. stock rom.
Seems the sgs2 is ruling the roost on this benchmark
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
49.7fps with stock ROM and performance governor in setCPU.
Did 3 runs, got 49.x fps in each run.
Sensation is handicapped in the test because it is running at higher res.
Could you guys try turning Chainfire3D off for a try?In case it affects results showing raw power of the GPU.
tolis626 said:
Could you guys try turning Chainfire3D off for a try?In case it affects results showing raw power of the GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 43,x with stock firmware and no root (so no Chainfire3D)
And yep,that's what I'm talkin' about!
I'm 80% sold at this point and all's inclining towards the Galaxy S 2!My wallet included!
Someone with the 1.5ghz overclock should try this
36 on first run, my sgs2 is a slough lol
rocketpaul said:
36 on first run, my sgs2 is a slough lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've scored lows of 36 too.
45.4 fps for me
Software has bugs. Shows needle between 50-60 but scores me at 43. First run was 35 after closing some apps.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
How about Electopia OpenGL ES 2.0 benchmark utility?
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.tactel.electopia
Has anyone used this for benchmarks? I don't have the phone myself, so can't test it
Third run i got 44.6 not to bothered about scores, not relevant in real world.
rd_nest said:
How about Electopia OpenGL ES 2.0 benchmark utility?
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.tactel.electopia
Has anyone used this for benchmarks? I don't have the phone myself, so can't test it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like that to
Got 53.8 as maximum score
Stock rooted KE7 no mods .
47.4 --- 47.5 --- 47.8
Electopia
Ave 45.07 fps
jje
OC @1.5 ghz and chainfire3d app
I too got 53.8 on nenamark as max
On electopia I got 56 fps.
Stock rom, no chainfire activated, no OC.
44/49 on nenamark
49/50 on electopia
45.2 - original ROM
Related
I'm just wondering what good benchmark results are. I'm at 683 at 1200mhz. What are you guys getting for results?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
demo23019 said:
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using king's #2 kernel. Are my numbers bad? I thought that the lower the number the better. I'm new with using benchmarks, so I really have no idea what I'm doing haha.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
i was using jacs kernel but it doesn't work with update so im stuck at 1ghz for now
Buy yea i never used setcpu to bench and with that yea lower is better.
im getting 755 with long bench
Im sure someone else will come post with similar 1.2 setup
I'm getting 622 on Long Bench in SetCPU
9.723 in Linpack
1940 in Quadrant
That's at 1200MHz on JAC's ExtremeMod with Voodoo, stock Deodexed 2.1
Dan_Brutal said:
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your numbers are fine. Dont be too conserned with benchmark scores even though it is fun to run them from a gear head point of view...
Although if you want a bit more accuracy, run any benchmark three times and average out your total score.
My scores are, so you have an idea:
Linpack= 9.2 averaged on three runs
SetCpu= Long Bench 636 averaged on three runs
Quadrant= 1863 on three runs
*(RyanZ's lagfix has been proven to cheat Quadrant thus giving users a much higher score. example: 2300,2400 etc.)*
Running Bionix 1.5 w/Jacs OC/Voodoo kernel
Hows the gaming on Tbolt?. Way better than older snapdragons like evo or inc? Comparable to galaxy s? Choppy? Smooth? Im just curious.
It is a lot better than the Evo but not on the same level of SGS phones, Samsung is always ahead in the graphics department.
So maybe droid x level?
Depends on what you are playing, of course. N64oid doesn't run all games smoothly yet.
The new Snapdragon processor that is in the thunderbolt is pretty much the same as the first hummingbird, so the graphic capabilities should also be about the same. I came from a Captivate and all the games I played on it play just as well. I do miss that SAMOLED screen though...
emulators are available right? like gameboid etc? You dont need root do you?
Familyguy1 said:
emulators are available right? like gameboid etc? You dont need root do you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont see whynot
I play this stupid little game called The Elements which is VERY processor intensive.
It ran pretty good on my Incredible. Ran pretty choppy on my Droid X, but on the Thunderbolt, it's smooth as heck. Way better than the previous two phones.
I bought the let's golf game accidentally but its a lot of fun and runs great for whatever kind of processor usage it takes...I still have to get raging thunder off my Droid but that should be good too..
Sent from my Thunderbolt using XDA App
SeenNotScene said:
Depends on what you are playing, of course. N64oid doesn't run all games smoothly yet.
The new Snapdragon processor that is in the thunderbolt is pretty much the same as the first hummingbird, so the graphic capabilities should also be about the same. I came from a Captivate and all the games I played on it play just as well. I do miss that SAMOLED screen though...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not anywhere close to the Hummingbird when it comes to graphics. Go look at some of the Quadrant tests and look at how smooth the graphics are. Thunderbolt stutters a bit but way way way better than the Evo ever was or could be.
If you run a Smartbench 2010 test, it will show the results for a SGS phone, graphics score way higher.
engagedtosmile said:
It is not anywhere close to the Hummingbird when it comes to graphics. Go look at some of the Quadrant tests and look at how smooth the graphics are. Thunderbolt stutters a bit but way way way better than the Evo ever was or could be.
If you run a Smartbench 2010 test, it will show the results for a SGS phone, graphics score way higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea because not the humming bird CPU but the sgs gpu (graphics processing unit) the snapdragon is was superior but Samsung gpu is better
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
superchilpil said:
Yea because not the humming bird CPU but the sgs gpu (graphics processing unit) the snapdragon is was superior but Samsung gpu is better
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hummingbird is both the CPU + GPU. CPU wise, they are based on ARM Cortex A8. Info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Hummingbird
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Cortex_A8
So in the end, Hummingbird is superior when it comes to graphic capabilities. Thunderbolt is faster when it comes to data crunching and processing.
"The current generation Snapdragon uses Adreno 205 GPUs. This GPU is just as fast as the Hummingbird, if not faster."
http://www.tested.com/news/hummingbird-vs-snapdragon-vs-omap-vs-tegra-2-arm-chips-explained/1704/
SeenNotScene said:
"The current generation Snapdragon uses Adreno 205 GPUs. This GPU is just as fast as the Hummingbird, if not faster."
http://www.tested.com/news/hummingbird-vs-snapdragon-vs-omap-vs-tegra-2-arm-chips-explained/1704/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not what the benchmarks are saying. Run one yourself.
Benchmarks are Benchmarks, Real Life performance is Real life performace.
My TB has been beastly on Words with Friends.
I've noticed that the evo 3d has been scoring lower than the sensation, which is spec'd performance-wise. Exactly the same except for the evo having more ram. So I don't really understand why it would eb scoeing lower
Also if you're here to try and dispute the credibility of benchmarks leave now because that's not the point of this topic.
Sent from my G2X
Well, the Evo 3D does have the ability to do 3D, so I imagine it will take up some resources, but I have a feeling that the benchmark scores will only get better as HTC and Sprint release updates and fixes for it.
Probably the bloatware
Benchmarks are boo boo! For a benchmark to read correctly the cores need to be ramped up to max for the test. The app does not draw full ramp from the dual cores. Plus they are asynchronous, once we root and have kernel source for added tweeks we will blow tegra away (even with tegra tweeked)!
For the most part synthetic benchmarks are not really useful. How much are they off anyways? I'll bet you'll never notice the difference.
Swyped from my Atari 2600
because you touch yourself at night.
cordell12 said:
Benchmarks are boo boo! For a benchmark to read correctly the cores need to be ramped up to max for the test. The app does not draw full ramp from the dual cores. Plus they are asynchronous, once we root and have kernel source for added tweeks we will blow tegra away (even with tegra tweeked)!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty much what I came into say. the Nexus S scores don't blow you away before you root either,but once Rooted, it is capable of truly amazing power.
pretty much every review says the Evo 3d feels much faster and much more fluid than the sensation.
hondarider525 said:
because you touch yourself at night.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMAO!
10 char
the processor is an ASYNC and the cores are able to run at different speeds for different task. The programs testing are better suited to your normal SYNC processor which are both always running at full all the time.
The need to write code to take advantage of the ASYNC and its methods to reach max must be included in the programming before they will ever be able to measure the full potential of the ASYNC.
you could say in those test I could garuntee you one processor is running max one is not. if at all. But if it is. its just a little as the program has not told it to run both processors at max if its a ASYNC,
ADD the qHD and the program would need to account for that.
imagine if the screen was amoled or just 800 x 480. this thing would be brutal beast.
but at the end of the day I love HTC phones.
HTC Sense is known to produce low benchmark scores. Once AOSP gets on this baby, it will fly through the irrelevant benchmarks like nothing.
Not only that but benchmarks are known to produce pointless infighting and petty bickering over measures that are not only highly suspect but also not related to actual use...
...or so the old wives tale goes...
Sent from my PC36100
xdmds said:
I've noticed that the evo 3d has been scoring lower than the sensation, which is spec'd performance-wise. Exactly the same except for the evo having more ram. So I don't really understand why it would eb scoeing lower
Also if you're here to try and dispute the credibility of benchmarks leave now because that's not the point of this topic.
Sent from my G2X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, check out Anandtech's bench of the Evo 3D and Sensation from a couple of weeks ago, and the check out the same bench of those 2 devices when they tested the Droid 3 a couple of days ago.
Comparing the scores, the 3vo scored the same both times. First time it was higher than the Sensation, and second time lower. So somewhere in between, the Sensation got a software update that made it score higher on those benchmarks. I'm guessing we'll see the same kind of improvement with the 3vo in time.
leaving now. Just beating a dead horse here, this has been debated a million times.
your holding it wrong?
NewZJ said:
your holding it wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah he should call up for his free rubber band.
freeza said:
HTC Sense is known to produce low benchmark scores. Once AOSP gets on this baby, it will fly through the irrelevant benchmarks like nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I did run asop on my evo no way will an asop rom touch my evo 3d. Sense 3.0 is great and I doubt asop will supoort 3d.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using XDA Premium App
I hate people who point out benchmarks on a phone... :|
LOL if htc's scrap snapdragon duel core had good benchmarks I bet all of you would be posting about how elite your phone is and how good it does in benchmarks but since it sucks you say benchmarks don't matter. Don't fool yourself benchmarks do matter. Yes quadrant can be tricked by unlocked phones with edits but benchmarks ran on tegra 2 & crap snapdragon using smartbench 2011 (does use both cores) gives realistic performance.
evo 3d
2089 cpu
1648 gpu (lol slower then galaxy s 1)
tegra 2 (stock atrix 2.3.4 with crap motoblur)
2737 cpu
2661 gpu
tegra 2 overclocked
3989 cpu
2900 gpu
shep211 said:
LOL if htc's scrap snapdragon duel core had good benchmarks I bet all of you would be posting about how elite your phone is and how good it does in benchmarks but since it sucks you say benchmarks don't matter. Don't fool yourself benchmarks do matter. Yes quadrant can be tricked by unlocked phones with edits but benchmarks ran on tegra 2 & crap snapdragon using smartbench 2011 (does use both cores) gives realistic performance.
evo 3d
2089 cpu
1648 gpu (lol slower then galaxy s 1)
tegra 2 (stock atrix 2.3.4 with crap motoblur)
2737 cpu
2661 gpu
tegra 2 overclocked
3989 cpu
2900 gpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro its because tegra manages different. Tegra uses both cores to do one single task. While the EVO 3D chip set is asynchronous. This means when you run a benchmark only one core is being processed during that application. The other core is running other processes to keep your EVO lag free and running smoothly. Benchmark is only a number anyway.
Remember this tho forever. benchmarks are like a girl in a bikini, they show a lot but not quite everything.
Sent from a dual core beast 3VO. Do this on your iFail 4
How are other android touchpads doing? W / the 1.7ghz overclock I'm hitting a Max of 98ish mflops and 3300+ on quadrant! Which makes it my fastest Droid to date. Lets see if anybody can post a better quadrant screenshot?
richard head said:
How are other android touchpads doing? W / the 1.7ghz overclock I'm hitting a Max of 98ish mflops and 3300+ on quadrant! Which makes it my fastest Droid to date. Lets see if anybody can post a better quadrant screenshot?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i overclock my touchpad to 1.782 ghz. do you know how to overclock gpu
adreno 220 is in 266 mhz original but i need to overclock it to 300 mhz because its a very good frequency or 320 mhz
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Gotcha
Think I beat you
Fastest I've gotten. Have not really tried with the latest versions.
general feeling is that as far as benchmarks go, quadrant is crap
should try antutu instead.
ive a thread in this section somewhere where some people have posted results
This discussion seems a bit flawed, in that you're gauging performance based upon benchmark software, etc. We've talked about this a lot over the past year, and most of these tests are very dependent upon specific hardware setups, usually in much older devices with older chipsets. My Nexus S w/ a single-core 1ghz UNDERCLOCKED to 880mhz scores a 3500 all the time in Quadrant. No way in hell it's better than the touchpad. It's not even a fair fight, if you compare raw specs.
Do you judge the performance of your computer based on how fast it can perform iterations of Prime 95? No, you judge it based on user experience.
Is your user experience with CM7 very fast? I know mine is. Based on that, and the experience I get with gfx-intense apps like GTA3, etc, I say the performance is very good.
PS. The fact that Quadrant to this day still has the Nexus One as its top reference device says something about it being old and outdated. The Nexus One came out in Jan 2010, 2 years ago.
So i just ran a test for the antutu benchmark with just the phone and nothing else and this is what i got Ill be running quadrant bench test also and that will be in my next reply Cant wait for root and unlock!
EDIT: Heres quadrant test stock with no 4g or extra stuff
wow how is the Antutu score so high???
hairdewx said:
wow how is the Antutu score so high???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadcore and that 2gb of ram haha imagine if i put my 64gb sd card in there haha
theDK10 said:
quadcore and that 2gb of ram haha imagine if i put my 64gb sd card in there haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sd cards don't help performance.
I got an Antutu score of 18424 right after activation
For reference, my Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet only had scores in the 12,000 range... WOW
I just received my Galaxy Note II today and was a bit shocked that it scored a lower score in AnTuTu's benchmark than my HTC Droid DNA. Given that it has a faster CPU and less pixels to render, you would think it would be faster.
I scored 19164 with my HTC Droid DNA, which is much higher than the 18084 I got with the Galaxy Note II.
makoto said:
I just received my Galaxy Note II today and was a bit shocked that it scored a lower score in AnTuTu's benchmark than my HTC Droid DNA. Given that it has a faster CPU and less pixels to render, you would think it would be faster.
I scored 19164 with my HTC Droid DNA, which is much higher than the 18084 I got with the Galaxy Note II.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Processor is newere on the droid dna, I will always say we don't use benchmarks, so stop being disappointed in your score it by no means represents everyday use..They are both future proof for a few years..
I have to laugh at people who care about benchmark scores when they have a device with a quad core cpu in it running Android.
Haha I don't care really about benchmarks I was just impressed that's all. DNA is nice but I need sd card and something with battery life. Only got about 3/4 through a day on a full charge.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
My s3 scores 6200 on quadrant, 11000 on antutu...tells you benchmarks are worthless.
droidstyle said:
My s3 scores 6200 on quadrant, 11000 on antutu...tells you benchmarks are worthless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im guessing rooted and unlocked? lol i got mine up 12000 rooted with a different kernal. As long as the phone runs fast and smooth i could care less lol
Benchmarks are far from worthless. They are an objective indicator of how certain components perform under the exact same stress test.
Now what you can say is worthless is people who look at a final score that is rather irrational instead of looking at individual component scores.
For example, CPU scores in these benchmarks is a clear indicator of which phone has a faster processor. While the very same phone that had a slower processor may have a significantly better GPU. What this means to the end user is that expect games to perform better on the slower CPU phone, but also expect things like web browsing to perform worse on the same device.
It's all objective comparisons, certainly not something to claim as "worthless" but at the same time if you do not look at it the right way and just throw a generic total score number around, then you won't be fairly comparing any two devices properly.
slide83 said:
Sd cards don't help performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong. The higher class sdcard, the faster the read/write speeds = better performance.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
ks3rv3rg said:
Wrong. The higher class sdcard, the faster the read/write speeds = better performance.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you :victory: My 64gb sd card increased the benchmark also. :good: And ya i usually look at certain things when running benchmarks but thats usually when im rooted and unlocked is when i really look at them closely.
After running Quadrant, my phone seems to warm up and each subsequent score is somewhat lower. I started at 6500 and it bottoms out around 6000. Anyone else have this heat problem?
Make sure everything is closed out when u run a test. It's putting everything to work in the phone so it's stressed out which could cause a lot of heat
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app